Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters (Type Certificate Previously Held by Eurocopter France), 27303-27305 [2016-10286]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB500009–00,
Issue 001, dated November 16, 2015.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Caspar Wang, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6414; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
caspar.wang@faa.gov.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 May 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB500009–00, Issue 001, dated
November 16, 2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 25,
2016.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–10404 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–3741; Directorate
Identifier 2014–SW–040–AD; Amendment
39–18507; AD 2016–09–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Eurocopter France)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
airworthiness directive (AD) 2013–08–
17 for Airbus Helicopters Model SA–
365N, SA–365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365
N3, and SA–366G1 helicopters. AD
2013–08–17 required initial and
recurring inspections of the 9-degree
fuselage frame for a crack and repairing
the frame if a crack exists. This new AD
modifies the compliance times and
expands the inspection area of the
9-inch frame. The actions of this AD are
intended to detect a crack in the
9-degree frame to prevent loss of
structural integrity and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD is effective June 10,
2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27303
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of June 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–
0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3741.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3741; or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any
incorporated-by-reference service
information, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (phone: 800–
647–5527) is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations
Office, M–30, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Grant, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, Texas
76177; telephone (817) 222–5110; email
robert.grant@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to remove AD 2013–08–17,
Amendment 39–17434 (78 FR 25380,
May 1, 2013) and add a new AD. AD
2013–08–17 applied to Airbus
Helicopters Model SA–365N, SA–
365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA–
366G1 helicopters and required initial
and recurring inspections of the inner
angles and flanges of the 9-degree
fuselage frame on the right-hand (RH)
and left-hand (LH) sides for a crack. If
a crack was found, AD 2013–08–17
required repairing the frame. AD 2013–
08–17 was prompted by EASA
Emergency AD No. 2010–0064–E, dated
April 1, 2010, to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified model
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
27304
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
helicopters. EASA, which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States
of the European Union, advises that of
a crack found in the 9-degree frame of
an AS 365 N2 helicopter that had logged
a total of 10,786 flight hours. EASA
states that the time required for
initiation of a crack in this area varies
according to the weight and balance
data of the different aircraft versions.
The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on December 21, 2015 (80 FR
79274). The NPRM was prompted by
EASA AD No. 2014–0159, dated July 7,
2014, which supersedes EASA
Emergency AD No. 2010–0064–E. EASA
advises of further analysis on the
strength of the 9-degree frame by Airbus
Helicopters, which indicates
compliance times should be modified
and the inspection area expanded.
Consequently, the NPRM proposed
retaining the inspections of the 9-degree
fuselage frame for a crack but in the
expanded area and within the modified
compliance times. These actions are
intended to detect a crack in the
9-degree frame to prevent loss of
structural integrity and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD, but
we received no comments on the NPRM
(80 FR 79274, December 21, 2015).
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of France and
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs and that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as
proposed.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Differences Between This AD and the
EASA AD
We do not require contacting the
manufacturer for approved repair
instructions. We also do not allow flight
with a known crack.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus Helicopters has issued an
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
(EASB), Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014,
containing the following three numbers:
No. 05.00.57 for the Model SA–365N
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 May 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
and N1, and AS–365N2 and N3 and for
military Model AS365F, Fs, Fi, and K
helicopters; No. 05.39 for Model SA–
366G1 and military Model SA 366–GA
helicopters; and No. 05.00.25 for
military Model AS565MA, MB, SA, SB,
and UB helicopters.
The EASB specifies checking at
regular intervals for a crack in the areas
of the inner angles and flanges of the 9degree frame on the RH and LH sides,
near the splice. Revision 2 of the EASB
modifies the compliance times, adds a
compliance time based on take-off/
landing cycles, and expands the
inspection areas up to the junction with
the upper part of the frame. EASA
classified this service information as
mandatory and issued EASA AD No.
2014–0159 to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 40
helicopters of U.S. Registry and that
labor costs average $85 a work hour.
Based on these estimates, we expect the
following costs:
• Inspecting the 9-degree frame
requires 3 work-hours per inspection for
a cost of $255 per helicopter and
$10,200 for the fleet per inspection
cycle.
• Repairing the 9-degree frame
requires 24 work-hours for a labor cost
of $2,040. Parts cost $3,350 for a total
cost of $5,390 per helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
helicopters identified in this rulemaking
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013–08–17, Amendment 39-17434 (78
FR 25380, May 1, 2013) and adding the
following new AD:
■
2016–09–09 Airbus Helicopters (Previously
Eurocopter France): Amendment 39–
18507; Docket No. FAA–2015–3741;
Directorate Identifier 2014–SW–040–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Model SA–365N, SA–365N1, AS–365N2, AS
365 N3, and SA–366G1 helicopters,
certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack in the 9-degree frame, which could
result in the loss of structural integrity and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Affected ADs
(h) Additional Information
This AD supersedes AD 2013–08–17,
Amendment 39–17434 (78 FR 25380, May 1,
2013).
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2014–0159, dated July 7, 2014. You may
view the EASA AD on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
FAA–2015–3741.
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective June 10, 2016.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Within 110 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after reaching the hours or landings
threshold, whichever occurs first, listed in
Table 1 to Paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or
within 110 hours TIS from the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 110 hours
TIS, using a 10X or higher magnifying glass
and a light, inspect the 9-degree fuselage
frame on the right-hand and left-hand sides
for a crack in the areas depicted in Figures
1 and 2 of Airbus Helicopters Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No. AS365
05.00.57, Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014, or
EASB No. SA366 05.39, Revision 2, dated
April 7, 2014, as applicable to your model
helicopter. For purposes of this AD, a landing
would be counted anytime the helicopter lifts
off into the air and then lands again
regardless of the duration of the landing and
regardless of whether the engine is shut
down.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (f)(1)
Helicopter model
SA–365N ..................
SA–365N1 ................
AS–365N2 ................
AS–365N3 ................
SA–366G1 ................
Hours
TIS
Landings
11,490
10,490
9,140
8,740
8,390
22,980
20,980
18,280
17,480
16,780
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight,
repair the frame. Repairing a frame does not
constitute terminating actions for the
repetitive inspection requirements of this
AD.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Group, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, Texas 76177; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email 9-ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@
faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 May 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5311, Fuselage Main, Frame.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 05.00.57, Revision 2,
dated April 7, 2014.
(ii) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 05.39, Revision 2, dated
April 7, 2014.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(2): Airbus
Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
No. 05.00.57 and Airbus Helicopters
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.39,
both Revision 2, and both dated April 7,
2014, are co-published as one document
along with Airbus Helicopters Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.00.25, Revision
2, dated April 7, 2014, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(3) For Airbus Helicopters service
information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N.
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323;
fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 22,
2016.
Scott A. Horn,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–10286 Filed 5–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27305
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–8427; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–212–AD; Amendment
39–18508; AD 2016–09–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2007–10–
10 R1 for all Airbus Model A300 B4–
600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4–605R
Variant F airplanes (collectively called
Model A300–600 series airplanes). AD
2007–10–10 R1 required revising the
Airworthiness Limitations Section
(ALS) of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness to incorporate new
limitations for fuel tank systems. This
new AD requires revising the
maintenance program or inspection
program to incorporate revised fuel
maintenance and inspection tasks. This
AD was prompted by issuance of more
restrictive maintenance requirements
and/or airworthiness limitations by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the potential of ignition sources
inside fuel tanks, which, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors caused by
latent failures, alterations, repairs, or
maintenance actions, could result in
fuel tank explosions and consequent
loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
10, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of June 10, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain other publication listed in
this AD as of December 28, 2009 (74 FR
65398, December 10, 2009).
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain other publications listed in
this AD as of June 27, 2007 (72 FR
28827, May 23, 2007).
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—
EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone
+33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email account.airworth-eas@
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27303-27305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10286]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-3741; Directorate Identifier 2014-SW-040-AD;
Amendment 39-18507; AD 2016-09-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Eurocopter France)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding airworthiness directive (AD) 2013-08-17 for
Airbus Helicopters Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and
SA-366G1 helicopters. AD 2013-08-17 required initial and recurring
inspections of the 9-degree fuselage frame for a crack and repairing
the frame if a crack exists. This new AD modifies the compliance times
and expands the inspection area of the 9-inch frame. The actions of
this AD are intended to detect a crack in the 9-degree frame to prevent
loss of structural integrity and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
DATES: This AD is effective June 10, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of June 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie,
TX 75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-
3775; or at https://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You may review
the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort
Worth, TX 76177. It is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
3741.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
3741; or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any
incorporated-by-reference service information, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations Office, M-30, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, Texas 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
robert.grant@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to remove AD 2013-08-17, Amendment 39-17434 (78 FR 25380, May
1, 2013) and add a new AD. AD 2013-08-17 applied to Airbus Helicopters
Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA-366G1 helicopters
and required initial and recurring inspections of the inner angles and
flanges of the 9-degree fuselage frame on the right-hand (RH) and left-
hand (LH) sides for a crack. If a crack was found, AD 2013-08-17
required repairing the frame. AD 2013-08-17 was prompted by EASA
Emergency AD No. 2010-0064-E, dated April 1, 2010, to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified model
[[Page 27304]]
helicopters. EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States
of the European Union, advises that of a crack found in the 9-degree
frame of an AS 365 N2 helicopter that had logged a total of 10,786
flight hours. EASA states that the time required for initiation of a
crack in this area varies according to the weight and balance data of
the different aircraft versions.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2015 (80
FR 79274). The NPRM was prompted by EASA AD No. 2014-0159, dated July
7, 2014, which supersedes EASA Emergency AD No. 2010-0064-E. EASA
advises of further analysis on the strength of the 9-degree frame by
Airbus Helicopters, which indicates compliance times should be modified
and the inspection area expanded. Consequently, the NPRM proposed
retaining the inspections of the 9-degree fuselage frame for a crack
but in the expanded area and within the modified compliance times.
These actions are intended to detect a crack in the 9-degree frame to
prevent loss of structural integrity and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD, but we received no comments on the NPRM (80 FR 79274, December
21, 2015).
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same
type designs and that air safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
We do not require contacting the manufacturer for approved repair
instructions. We also do not allow flight with a known crack.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus Helicopters has issued an Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
(EASB), Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014, containing the following three
numbers: No. 05.00.57 for the Model SA-365N and N1, and AS-365N2 and N3
and for military Model AS365F, Fs, Fi, and K helicopters; No. 05.39 for
Model SA-366G1 and military Model SA 366-GA helicopters; and No.
05.00.25 for military Model AS565MA, MB, SA, SB, and UB helicopters.
The EASB specifies checking at regular intervals for a crack in the
areas of the inner angles and flanges of the 9-degree frame on the RH
and LH sides, near the splice. Revision 2 of the EASB modifies the
compliance times, adds a compliance time based on take-off/landing
cycles, and expands the inspection areas up to the junction with the
upper part of the frame. EASA classified this service information as
mandatory and issued EASA AD No. 2014-0159 to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 40 helicopters of U.S. Registry
and that labor costs average $85 a work hour. Based on these estimates,
we expect the following costs:
Inspecting the 9-degree frame requires 3 work-hours per
inspection for a cost of $255 per helicopter and $10,200 for the fleet
per inspection cycle.
Repairing the 9-degree frame requires 24 work-hours for a
labor cost of $2,040. Parts cost $3,350 for a total cost of $5,390 per
helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on helicopters identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-08-17, Amendment 39-17434 (78 FR 25380, May 1, 2013) and adding
the following new AD:
2016-09-09 Airbus Helicopters (Previously Eurocopter France):
Amendment 39-18507; Docket No. FAA-2015-3741; Directorate Identifier
2014-SW-040-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Model SA-365N, SA-365N1,
AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA-366G1 helicopters, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in the 9-degree
frame, which could result in the loss of structural integrity and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
[[Page 27305]]
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2013-08-17, Amendment 39-17434 (78 FR
25380, May 1, 2013).
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective June 10, 2016.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Within 110 hours time-in-service (TIS) after reaching the
hours or landings threshold, whichever occurs first, listed in Table
1 to Paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or within 110 hours TIS from the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS, using a 10X or higher
magnifying glass and a light, inspect the 9-degree fuselage frame on
the right-hand and left-hand sides for a crack in the areas depicted
in Figures 1 and 2 of Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin (EASB) No. AS365 05.00.57, Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014,
or EASB No. SA366 05.39, Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014, as
applicable to your model helicopter. For purposes of this AD, a
landing would be counted anytime the helicopter lifts off into the
air and then lands again regardless of the duration of the landing
and regardless of whether the engine is shut down.
Table 1 to Paragraph (f)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helicopter model Hours TIS Landings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SA-365N........................................... 11,490 22,980
SA-365N1.......................................... 10,490 20,980
AS-365N2.......................................... 9,140 18,280
AS-365N3.......................................... 8,740 17,480
SA-366G1.......................................... 8,390 16,780
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight, repair the
frame. Repairing a frame does not constitute terminating actions for
the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, Texas 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email 9-ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No. 2014-0159, dated July 7, 2014. You may view the
EASA AD on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
FAA-2015-3741.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5311, Fuselage
Main, Frame.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
05.00.57, Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014.
(ii) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
05.39, Revision 2, dated April 7, 2014.
Note 1 to paragraph (j)(2): Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 05.00.57 and Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 05.39, both Revision 2, and both dated April 7,
2014, are co-published as one document along with Airbus Helicopters
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.00.25, Revision 2, dated
April 7, 2014, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(3) For Airbus Helicopters service information identified in
this final rule, contact Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800)
232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at https://www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 22, 2016.
Scott A. Horn,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-10286 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P