36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification, 27122-27124 [2016-10551]
Download as PDF
27122
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Notices
Appendix F: Record of Decision (ROD)
RECORD OF DECISION
[Project Name]
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION
AGENCY/UNITED STATES
STRATEGIC COMMAND CENTER FOR
COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS
DESTRUCTION (DTRA/SCC–WMD)
[Project Location]
[County, State]
Decision
Based on my review of the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), I
have decided to implement Alternative
[X], which [insert description of
selected alternative. Include any
permits, licenses, grants, or
authorizations needed to implement the
decision. Also include any mitigation
and monitoring actions related to the
decision.]
Background
[Provide a brief description of the
purpose and need for action.]
Decision Rationale
[Describe the reasons for the decision.
Specifically, discuss the following:
How the selected action/alternative
best meets the purpose and need and
why other alternatives were not
selected.
How significant issues and
environmental impacts were considered
and taken into account.
Any factors other than environmental
effects considered in making the
decision.
Discuss how the above factors
influenced the decision (are some more
important than others?)
State whether all practical means to
avoid or minimize environmental harm
from the selected alternative have been
adopted and if not, why not.]
The [Project Name] EIS documents
the analysis and conclusions upon
which this decision is based.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Public Involvement
A notice of intent to prepare an EIS
was published in the Federal Register
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 May 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
on [date] ([Cite Federal Register volume
and beginning page number (i.e. 73 FR
43084]). People were invited to review
and comment on the proposal through
[insert public notice methods and dates
such as mailings, news releases, phone
calls, etc.]. The EIS lists agencies,
organizations, and people who received
copies on page [X].
The following issues were identified
from scoping comments and were used
to determine the scope of the analysis.
[Briefly describe the significant issues
used in the analysis]. A full description
of issues significant to the proposed
action appears in the EIS on page [X].
A draft EIS was published for review
and comment on [date of publication of
EPA’s notice of availability in the
Federal Register].
Alternatives Considered
In addition to the selected alternative,
I considered [X] other alternatives,
which are discussed below. A more
detailed comparison of these
alternatives can be found in the EIS on
pages [X–X].
Alternative 1—[insert a brief
description of the alternative; identify
which is considered to be
environmentally-preferable.]
Alternative 2 —[insert a brief
description of the alternative]
[Repeat for each alternative.]
Mitigation
[State (a) which mitigation measures
have been adopted; (b) whether all
practicable means to avoid or minimize
have been adopted, and if not why they
were not; and (c) whether monitoring
and enforcement programs are adopted,
and if so summarize them.]
Implementation Date
[Describe the expected date(s) of
implementation].
Contact
For additional information concerning
this decision, contact: [contact name,
title, office, mailing address, phone
number, and email]
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Concurrence:
llllllllllllllllll
l
[Name]
Project/Program Manager
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
llllllllllllllllll
l
Director, J4E
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
Approval:
llllllllllllllllll
l
Director, DTRA/SCC–WMD
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
[FR Doc. 2016–10376 Filed 5–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 16–07]
36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of a
section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
This is published to fulfill the
requirements of section 155 of Public
Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather N. Harwell, DSCA/LMO, (703)
697–9217.
The following is a copy of a letter to
the Speaker of the House of
Representatives,
Transmittal 16–07 with attached
Policy Justification and Sensitivity of
Technology.
SUMMARY:
Dated: May 2, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Notices
Transmittal No. 16–07
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act, as Amended
(i) Prospective Purchaser: Government
of Qatar
(ii) Total Estimated Value:
Major Defense Equipment *
Other .....................................
$ 227 million
$ 33 million
Total
$ 260 million
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 May 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
(iii) Description and Quantity or
Quantities of Articles or Services under
Consideration for Purchase:
Major Defense Equipment (MDE):
Two-hundred and fifty-two (252) RIM
116C Rolling Airframe Tactical
Missiles
Two (2) RIM 116C–2 Rolling Airframe
Telemetry Missiles
Also included are the following nonMDE items; support equipment,
publications, technical documentation,
personnel training, U.S. Government
and contractor engineering, technical
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and logistics support services, live fire
test event support, and other related
integration elements. The estimated cost
is $260 million.
(iv) Military Department: U.S. Navy
(AAD)
(v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None
(vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid,
Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology
Contained in the Defense Article or
Defense Services Proposed to be Sold:
See Attached Annex
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
EN05MY16.025
BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
27123
27124
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2016 / Notices
(viii) Date Report Delivered to
Congress: 21 April 2016
* as defined in Section 47(6) of the
Arms Export Control Act.
POLICY JUSTIFICATION
Qatar—RIM–116C and RIM–116C–2
Rolling Airframe Missiles
The Government of Qatar has
requested a possible sale of twohundred and fifty-two (252) RIM–116C
Rolling Airframe Tactical Missiles, and
two (2) RIM 116C–2 Rolling Airframe
Telemetry Missiles. Also included are
support equipment, publications and
technical documentation, personnel
training, U.S. Government and
contractor engineering, technical and
logistics support services, live fire test
event support, and other related
integration elements. The total
estimated value of MDE is $227 million.
The overall total estimated value is $260
million.
This proposed sale contributes to the
foreign policy and national security of
the United States by helping to improve
the security of a friendly country. Qatar
is an important force for political
stability and economic progress in the
Persian Gulf region. This proposed sale
will provide Qatar with military
capabilities to protect its naval forces
and nearby oil/gas infrastructure from
air and missile threats. Qatar will have
no difficulty absorbing these missiles
into its armed forces.
The proposed sale of this equipment,
services, and support will not alter the
basic military balance in the region.
The principal contractor will be
Raytheon Missile Systems in Tucson,
Arizona. There are no known offset
agreements proposed in connection
with this potential sale.
Implementation of this proposed sale
will require multiple trips by U.S.
Government and contractor
representatives to participate in program
and technical reviews, system
integration, as well as training and
maintenance support in country for a
period of thirty-six (36) months.
There will be no adverse impact on
U.S. defense readiness as a result of this
proposed sale.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Transmittal No. 16–07
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act, as Amended
Annex
Item No. vii
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
The RIM–116C Rolling Airframe
Missile is an autonomous (i.e., ‘‘fire and
forget’’) lightweight, supersonic,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 May 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
surface-to-air tactical missile for ship
self-defense against current and
evolving anti-ship cruise missile threats.
Advanced technology in the RIM–116C
includes dual-mode RF/IR (radio
frequency/infrared) guidance with IR
all-the-way capability for non-emitting
threats. The highest classification of the
hardware, embedded software, and
maintenance is CONFIDENTIAL. The
RIM–116C–2 is a non-tactical telemetry
round, used primarily for test and
training purposes; it includes an
unclassified telemeter which replaces
the warhead section. The data set,
generated by RIM–116C–2 is
UNCLASSIFIED.
The Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM)
is a product of a cooperative program
with Germany and has been executed,
since 1976, under a series of governing
Memoranda of Understanding/
Memoranda of Agreements (MOU/
MOAs) for the development,
production, and in-service support
between the United States and
Germany.
A determination has been made that
the Government of Qatar can provide
substantially the same degree of
protection for the sensitive technology
being released as the U.S. Government.
This sale is necessary in furtherance of
U.S. foreign policy and national security
objectives outlined in the Policy
Justification.
All defense articles and services listed
in this transmittal have been authorized
for release and export to the
Government of Qatar.
[FR Doc. 2016–10551 Filed 5–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Charter Renewal of Department of
Defense Federal Advisory Committees
Department of Defense.
Renewal of Federal Advisory
Committee.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Defense
(DoD) is publishing this notice to
announce that it is renewing the charter
for the Chief of Engineers
Environmental Advisory Board (‘‘the
Board’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Freeman, Advisory Committee
Management Officer for the Department
of Defense, 703–692–5952.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Board’s charter is being renewed in
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) of 1972 (5
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended) and 41
CFR 102–3.50(d). The Board’s charter
and contact information for the Board’s
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) can be
found at https://www.facadatabase.gov/.
The Board provides the Secretary of
Defense and the Deputy Secretary of
Defense, through the Secretary of the
Army, the Assistant Secretary of the
Army (Civil Works), and the Chief of
Engineers, with independent advice and
recommendations on matters relating to
the two distinct component programs of
the United States Army Corps of
Engineers—the Military Program, which
supports Army war fighters, and the
Civil Works Program, which manages
many of the water resources of the
Nation.
The Board is composed of no more
than 10 members who are eminent
authorities in the fields of natural (e.g.
biology, ecology), social (e.g.
anthropology, community planning),
and related sciences. All members of the
Board are appointed to provide advice
on behalf of the Government on the
basis of their best judgment without
representing any particular point of
view and in a manner that is free from
conflict of interest. Except for
reimbursement of official Board-related
travel and per diem, Board members
serve without compensation.
The DoD, as necessary and consistent
with the Board’s mission and DoD
policies and procedures, may establish
subcommittees, task forces, or working
groups to support the Board, and all
subcommittees must operate under the
provisions of FACA and the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Subcommittees will not work
independently of the Board and must
report all recommendations and advice
solely to the Board for full deliberation
and discussion. Subcommittees, task
forces, or working groups have no
authority to make decisions and
recommendations, verbally or in
writing, on behalf of the Board. No
subcommittee or any of its members can
update or report, verbally or in writing,
directly to the DoD or any Federal
officers or employees.
The Board’s DFO, pursuant to DoD
policy, must be a full-time or permanent
part-time DoD employee, and must be in
attendance for the duration of each and
every Board/subcommittee meeting. The
public or interested organizations may
submit written statements to the Board
membership about the Board’s mission
and functions. Such statements may be
submitted at any time or in response to
the stated agenda of planned Board. All
written statements must be submitted to
the Board’s DFO who will ensure the
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27122-27124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10551]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 16-07]
36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated
July 21, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather N. Harwell, DSCA/LMO, (703)
697-9217.
The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of
Representatives,
Transmittal 16-07 with attached Policy Justification and
Sensitivity of Technology.
Dated: May 2, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[[Page 27123]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05MY16.025
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Transmittal No. 16-07
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section
36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as Amended
(i) Prospective Purchaser: Government of Qatar
(ii) Total Estimated Value:
Major Defense Equipment *................ $ 227 million
Other.................................... $ 33 million
------------------------------
Total $ 260 million
(iii) Description and Quantity or Quantities of Articles or
Services under Consideration for Purchase:
Major Defense Equipment (MDE):
Two-hundred and fifty-two (252) RIM 116C Rolling Airframe Tactical
Missiles
Two (2) RIM 116C-2 Rolling Airframe Telemetry Missiles
Also included are the following non-MDE items; support equipment,
publications, technical documentation, personnel training, U.S.
Government and contractor engineering, technical and logistics support
services, live fire test event support, and other related integration
elements. The estimated cost is $260 million.
(iv) Military Department: U.S. Navy (AAD)
(v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None
(vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, Offered, or Agreed to be
Paid: None
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology Contained in the Defense Article or
Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: See Attached Annex
[[Page 27124]]
(viii) Date Report Delivered to Congress: 21 April 2016
* as defined in Section 47(6) of the Arms Export Control Act.
POLICY JUSTIFICATION
Qatar--RIM-116C and RIM-116C-2 Rolling Airframe Missiles
The Government of Qatar has requested a possible sale of two-
hundred and fifty-two (252) RIM-116C Rolling Airframe Tactical
Missiles, and two (2) RIM 116C-2 Rolling Airframe Telemetry Missiles.
Also included are support equipment, publications and technical
documentation, personnel training, U.S. Government and contractor
engineering, technical and logistics support services, live fire test
event support, and other related integration elements. The total
estimated value of MDE is $227 million. The overall total estimated
value is $260 million.
This proposed sale contributes to the foreign policy and national
security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a
friendly country. Qatar is an important force for political stability
and economic progress in the Persian Gulf region. This proposed sale
will provide Qatar with military capabilities to protect its naval
forces and nearby oil/gas infrastructure from air and missile threats.
Qatar will have no difficulty absorbing these missiles into its armed
forces.
The proposed sale of this equipment, services, and support will not
alter the basic military balance in the region.
The principal contractor will be Raytheon Missile Systems in
Tucson, Arizona. There are no known offset agreements proposed in
connection with this potential sale.
Implementation of this proposed sale will require multiple trips by
U.S. Government and contractor representatives to participate in
program and technical reviews, system integration, as well as training
and maintenance support in country for a period of thirty-six (36)
months.
There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a
result of this proposed sale.
Transmittal No. 16-07
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section
36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as Amended
Annex
Item No. vii
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
The RIM-116C Rolling Airframe Missile is an autonomous (i.e.,
``fire and forget'') lightweight, supersonic, surface-to-air tactical
missile for ship self-defense against current and evolving anti-ship
cruise missile threats. Advanced technology in the RIM-116C includes
dual-mode RF/IR (radio frequency/infrared) guidance with IR all-the-way
capability for non-emitting threats. The highest classification of the
hardware, embedded software, and maintenance is CONFIDENTIAL. The RIM-
116C-2 is a non-tactical telemetry round, used primarily for test and
training purposes; it includes an unclassified telemeter which replaces
the warhead section. The data set, generated by RIM-116C-2 is
UNCLASSIFIED.
The Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) is a product of a cooperative
program with Germany and has been executed, since 1976, under a series
of governing Memoranda of Understanding/Memoranda of Agreements (MOU/
MOAs) for the development, production, and in-service support between
the United States and Germany.
A determination has been made that the Government of Qatar can
provide substantially the same degree of protection for the sensitive
technology being released as the U.S. Government. This sale is
necessary in furtherance of U.S. foreign policy and national security
objectives outlined in the Policy Justification.
All defense articles and services listed in this transmittal have
been authorized for release and export to the Government of Qatar.
[FR Doc. 2016-10551 Filed 5-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P