Special Protocol Assessment; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability, 26799-26800 [2016-10391]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2016 / Notices
there was a week-long public comment
period that was announced in the
Federal Register on March 29, 2016 (81
FR 17460). This ICR contains the
revised surveys based on testing and
public comments provided during the
survey testing period.
Emergency OMB approval is being
sought, as permitted under 5 CPR
1320.13(a)(2)(i), since public harm is
reasonably likely to occur if the regular
nonemergency PRA clearance
procedures are followed. Potential harm
may result due to insufficient
information to adequately support
decision making that is required in
November 2016. The clearance is
particularly important for decisions
about the renewal of precedent-setting
waivers of Medicaid policy that assure
important beneficiary protections
regarding coverage and access to care;
e.g., the NEMT waiver. That waiver
ends or will be extended by no later
than December 1, 2016. The survey
effort is critical to supply more detail
and information on HIP 2.0 beneficiary
understanding and experiences (current
and new enrollees as well as
disenrollees/lockouts). Other
information on other key policies under
the Indiana HIP 2.0 demonstration, such
as the 60 day beneficiary lock-out
period, is also included in this
information collection. Including this
other information, as well as the
interviews and focus groups, with the
NEMT related information allows all
this information to be collected during
the same period of time; this will
improve the efficiency of resources
when compared to fielding separate
surveys, interviews and focus groups at
a later time which would be needed
under the regular PRA process. Form
Number: CMS–10615 (OMB control
number: 0938–1300); Frequency: Once;
Affected Public: Individuals and
households, Private sector (Business or
other for-profits and Not-for-profits
institutions), and State, Local, or Tribal
Governments; Number of Respondents:
5,240; Total Annual Responses: 5,240;
Total Annual Hours: 1,442. (For policy
questions regarding this collection
contact Teresa DeCaro at 202–384–
6309).
Written comments and
recommendations will be considered
from the public if received by the date
and address noted above.
Dated: April 29, 2016.
William N. Parham, III,
Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office
of Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–10448 Filed 5–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 May 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–D–1174]
Special Protocol Assessment; Draft
Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft
guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Special
Protocol Assessment.’’ This draft
guidance provides information about
the procedures and general policies
adopted by the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (CBER) for special protocol
assessment (SPA). This draft guidance is
intended to improve the quality of
Requests for SPAs and accompanying
submission materials, and the quality of
the resulting interaction between
sponsors and FDA. This draft guidance
revises the guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Special Protocol Assessment’’
issued May 17, 2002.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by July 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26799
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–1174 for ‘‘Special Protocol
Assessment; Draft Guidance for
Industry; Availability.’’ Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
26800
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2016 / Notices
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building.,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, or Office of Communication,
Outreach, and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label
to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amalia Himaya, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6439,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–0700; or Stephen Ripley, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
240–402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Special Protocol Assessment.’’ SPA is
a process by which sponsors may
request to meet with FDA to reach
agreement on the design and size of
certain trials, clinical studies, or animal
trials to determine if they adequately
address scientific and regulatory
requirements. After completing the SPA
review, FDA issues a letter including an
assessment of the protocol, agreement or
nonagreement with the proposed
protocol, and answers to the sponsor’s
relevant questions. Section 119 of the
Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act of 1997 amended
section 505(b) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 355(b)) and directed FDA to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 May 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
meet with sponsors who request to
meet, provided certain conditions are
met, to reach agreement on the design
and size of the well-controlled clinical
trials intended to form the primary basis
for a demonstration of effectiveness in a
marketing application submitted under
section 505(b) of the FD&C Act or
section 351 of the Public Health Service
(PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 262). These
provisions subsequently were amended
in section 7002(d)(1) of the Biologics
Price Competition and Innovation Act of
2009 to include any necessary clinical
study or studies for biosimilar biological
product applications under section
351(k) of the PHS Act. In 2013, the
Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness
Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Pub. L.
113–5) further amended the SPA
provisions to provide for SPA
agreements regarding animal and
associated clinical trials conducted in
support of applications for products
developed under 21 CFR part 314
subpart I, and 21 CFR part 601 subpart
H (the animal rule). Such marketing
applications include new drug
applications (NDAs), biologics license
applications (BLAs), and efficacy
supplements to approved NDAs and
BLAs.
In conjunction with the Prescription
Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012
(PDUFA V), enacted as part of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (FDASIA), and with the
Biosimilar User Fee Act of 2012
(BsUFA), enacted as part of FDASIA,
FDA agreed to specific performance
goals (PDUFA V goals and BsUFA goals,
respectively) for SPA. Per section
505(b)(5)(B) of the FD&C Act, the
PDUFA V goals, and the BsUFA goals,
the following protocols are eligible for
SPA: (1) Animal carcinogenicity
protocols; (2) drug substance and drug
product stability protocols; (3) animal
efficacy protocols for studies intended
to provide primary evidence of
effectiveness required for approval or
for licensure for products developed
under the animal rule; (4) protocols for
clinical trials or studies intended to
form the primary basis of an efficacy
claim; and (5) protocols for clinical
studies necessary to prove biosimilarity
and/or interchangeability.
This draft guidance revises the
guidance of the same name issued in
May 2002. After it has been finalized,
this guidance will replace the May 2002
guidance. Significant changes from the
2002 version include the following: (1)
Clarifying which protocols are eligible
for SPA; (2) adding animal rule efficacy
protocols intended to support approval
under part 314 subpart I, and part 601
subpart H, for drugs and biological
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
products, respectively; (3) adding
protocols intended to support approval
of a biosimilar biological product; (4)
providing greater detail about the
content of an SPA submission; and (5)
clarifying the process for rescinding an
SPA agreement. FDA seeks comments to
aid in finalizing this draft guidance.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the current thinking of FDA
on the procedural aspects of SPA. It
does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements
of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information that are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information referred to in
the guidance entitled ‘‘Special Protocol
Assessment’’ have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0470. The
collections of information for FDA Form
1571 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0014.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: April 28, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–10391 Filed 5–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–P–1654]
Determination That LEUCOVORIN
CALCIUM (Leucovorin Calcium)
Injectable and Other Drug Products
Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for
Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26799-26800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10391]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-D-1174]
Special Protocol Assessment; Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Special
Protocol Assessment.'' This draft guidance provides information about
the procedures and general policies adopted by the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research (CBER) for special protocol assessment (SPA). This draft
guidance is intended to improve the quality of Requests for SPAs and
accompanying submission materials, and the quality of the resulting
interaction between sponsors and FDA. This draft guidance revises the
guidance for industry entitled ``Special Protocol Assessment'' issued
May 17, 2002.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by July 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-D-1174 for ``Special Protocol Assessment; Draft Guidance for
Industry; Availability.'' Received comments will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
[[Page 26800]]
56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building., 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or
Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amalia Himaya, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6439, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-0700; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Special Protocol Assessment.'' SPA is a process by which
sponsors may request to meet with FDA to reach agreement on the design
and size of certain trials, clinical studies, or animal trials to
determine if they adequately address scientific and regulatory
requirements. After completing the SPA review, FDA issues a letter
including an assessment of the protocol, agreement or nonagreement with
the proposed protocol, and answers to the sponsor's relevant questions.
Section 119 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of
1997 amended section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(b)) and directed FDA to meet with
sponsors who request to meet, provided certain conditions are met, to
reach agreement on the design and size of the well-controlled clinical
trials intended to form the primary basis for a demonstration of
effectiveness in a marketing application submitted under section 505(b)
of the FD&C Act or section 351 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act
(42 U.S.C. 262). These provisions subsequently were amended in section
7002(d)(1) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of
2009 to include any necessary clinical study or studies for biosimilar
biological product applications under section 351(k) of the PHS Act. In
2013, the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of
2013 (Pub. L. 113-5) further amended the SPA provisions to provide for
SPA agreements regarding animal and associated clinical trials
conducted in support of applications for products developed under 21
CFR part 314 subpart I, and 21 CFR part 601 subpart H (the animal
rule). Such marketing applications include new drug applications
(NDAs), biologics license applications (BLAs), and efficacy supplements
to approved NDAs and BLAs.
In conjunction with the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of
2012 (PDUFA V), enacted as part of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), and with the Biosimilar User Fee
Act of 2012 (BsUFA), enacted as part of FDASIA, FDA agreed to specific
performance goals (PDUFA V goals and BsUFA goals, respectively) for
SPA. Per section 505(b)(5)(B) of the FD&C Act, the PDUFA V goals, and
the BsUFA goals, the following protocols are eligible for SPA: (1)
Animal carcinogenicity protocols; (2) drug substance and drug product
stability protocols; (3) animal efficacy protocols for studies intended
to provide primary evidence of effectiveness required for approval or
for licensure for products developed under the animal rule; (4)
protocols for clinical trials or studies intended to form the primary
basis of an efficacy claim; and (5) protocols for clinical studies
necessary to prove biosimilarity and/or interchangeability.
This draft guidance revises the guidance of the same name issued in
May 2002. After it has been finalized, this guidance will replace the
May 2002 guidance. Significant changes from the 2002 version include
the following: (1) Clarifying which protocols are eligible for SPA; (2)
adding animal rule efficacy protocols intended to support approval
under part 314 subpart I, and part 601 subpart H, for drugs and
biological products, respectively; (3) adding protocols intended to
support approval of a biosimilar biological product; (4) providing
greater detail about the content of an SPA submission; and (5)
clarifying the process for rescinding an SPA agreement. FDA seeks
comments to aid in finalizing this draft guidance.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on the procedural
aspects of SPA. It does not establish any rights for any person and is
not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach
if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information that are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collections of information referred to in the guidance
entitled ``Special Protocol Assessment'' have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0470. The collections of information for FDA Form
1571 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0014.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm, or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: April 28, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-10391 Filed 5-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P