Self-Employment Tax Treatment of Partners in a Partnership That Owns a Disregarded Entity, 26693-26695 [2016-10383]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
therefore confirms the rule without
change.
DATES: Effective May 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs and Collaborative
Action, Office of the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs; telephone
(202) 273–4680, elizabeth.appel@
bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
1, 2016, the Department published an
interim final rule (81 FR 10475) to
extend the deadline by which a relative
of a deceased Indian can apply for
burial assistance for the deceased Indian
from 30 days following death to 180
days following death.
The Department received three
comments on the rule, all of which were
supportive of the rule. None of the
comments requested changes to the rule.
Consequently, the Department did not
make any change to the interim final
rule as a result of this comment. For
these reasons, the Department confirms
the interim rule published March 1,
2016 (81 FR 10475), as final without
change.
Dated: April 26, 2016.
Lawrence S. Roberts,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–10409 Filed 5–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9766]
RIN 1545–BM87
Self-Employment Tax Treatment of
Partners in a Partnership That Owns a
Disregarded Entity
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary
regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
and temporary regulations that clarify
the employment tax treatment of
partners in a partnership that owns a
disregarded entity. These regulations
affect partners in a partnership that
owns a disregarded entity. The text of
these temporary regulations serves as
the text of proposed regulations (REG–
114307–15) published in the Proposed
Rules section in this issue of the Federal
Register.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective on May 4, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
Applicability date: For date of
applicability, see § 301–7701–2T(e)(8).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew K. Holubeck at (202) 317–4774
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 301.7701–2(c)(2)(i) states that,
except as otherwise provided, a
business entity that has a single owner
and is not a corporation under
§ 301.7701–2(b) is disregarded as an
entity separate from its owner (a
disregarded entity). However,
§ 301.7701–2(c)(2)(iv)(B) provides that
an entity that is a disregarded entity is
treated as a corporation for purposes of
employment taxes imposed under
subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). Therefore, the disregarded
entity, rather than the owner, is
considered to be the employer of the
entity’s employees for purposes of
employment taxes imposed by subtitle
C.
While § 301.7701–2(c)(2)(iv)(B) treats
a disregarded entity as a corporation for
employment tax purposes, this rule does
not apply for self-employment tax
purposes. Specifically, § 301.7701–
2(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) provides that the
general rule of § 301.7701–2(c)(2)(i)
applies for self-employment tax
purposes. After setting forth this general
rule, the regulation applies this rule in
the context of a single individual owner
by stating that the owner of an entity
that is treated in the same manner as a
sole proprietorship is subject to tax on
self-employment income. The
regulation, at § 301.7701–2(c)(2)(iv)(D),
also includes an example that
specifically illustrates the mechanics of
the rule. In the example, the disregarded
entity is subject to employment tax with
respect to employees of the disregarded
entity. The individual owner, however,
is subject to self-employment tax on the
net earnings from self-employment
resulting from the disregarded entity’s
activities. The regulations do not
include a separate example in which the
disregarded entity is owned by a
partnership.
It has come to the attention of the
Treasury Department and the IRS that
even though the regulations set forth a
general rule that an entity is disregarded
as a separate entity from the owner for
self-employment tax purposes, some
taxpayers may have read the current
regulations to permit the treatment of
individual partners in a partnership that
owns a disregarded entity as employees
of the disregarded entity because the
regulations did not include a specific
example applying the general rule in the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26693
partnership context. Under this reading,
which was not intended, some
taxpayers have permitted partners to
participate in certain tax-favored
employee benefit plans. The Treasury
Department and the IRS note that the
regulations did not create a distinction
between a disregarded entity owned by
an individual (that is, a sole
proprietorship) and a disregarded entity
owned by a partnership in the
application of the self-employment tax
rule. Rather, § 301.7701–2(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2)
provides that the general rule of
§ 301.7701–2(c)(2)(i) applies for selfemployment tax purposes for any owner
of a disregarded entity without carving
out an exception regarding a partnership
that owns such a disregarded entity. In
addition, the Treasury Department and
the IRS do not believe that the
regulations alter the holding of Rev. Rul.
69–184, 1969–1 CB 256, which provides
that: (1) Bona fide members of a
partnership are not employees of the
partnership within the meaning of the
Federal Insurance Contributions Act,
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act,
and the Collection of Income Tax at
Source on Wages (chapters 21, 23, and
24, respectively, subtitle C, Internal
Revenue Code of 1954), and (2) such a
partner who devotes time and energy in
the conduct of the trade or business of
the partnership, or in providing services
to the partnership as an independent
contractor, is, in either event, a selfemployed individual rather than an
individual who, under the usual
common law rules applicable in
determining the employer-employee
relationship, has the status of an
employee.
To address this issue, the Treasury
Department and the IRS clarify in these
temporary regulations that the rule that
a disregarded entity is treated as a
corporation for employment tax
purposes does not apply to the selfemployment tax treatment of any
individuals who are partners in a
partnership that owns a disregarded
entity. The rule that the entity is
disregarded for self-employment tax
purposes applies to partners in the same
way that it applies to a sole proprietor
owner. Accordingly, the partners are
subject to the same self-employment tax
rules as partners in a partnership that
does not own a disregarded entity.
Explanation of Provisions
This document contains amendments
to the Procedure and Administration
Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under
section 7701 of the Code to clarify that
a disregarded entity that is treated as a
corporation for purposes of employment
taxes imposed under subtitle C of the
E:\FR\FM\04MYR1.SGM
04MYR1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
26694
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Code is not treated as a corporation for
purposes of employing its individual
owner, who is treated as a sole
proprietor, or employing an individual
that is a partner in a partnership that
owns the disregarded entity. Rather, the
entity is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for this purpose.
Existing regulations already provide that
the entity is disregarded for selfemployment tax purposes and
specifically note that the owner of an
entity treated in the same manner as a
sole proprietorship under § 301.7701–
2(a) is subject to tax on self-employment
income. These temporary regulations
apply this existing general rule to
illustrate that, if a partnership is the
owner of a disregarded entity, the
partners in the partnership are subject to
the same self-employment tax rules as
partners in a partnership that does not
own a disregarded entity.
While these temporary regulations
provide that a disregarded entity owned
by a partnership is not treated as a
corporation for purposes of employing
any partner of the partnership, these
regulations do not address the
application of Rev. Rul. 69–184 in tiered
partnership situations. Several
commenters have requested that the IRS
provide additional guidance on the
application of Rev. Rul. 69–184 to tiered
partnership situations, and have also
suggested modifying the holding of Rev.
Rul. 69–184 to allow partnerships to
treat partners as employees in certain
circumstances, such as, for example,
employees in a partnership who obtain
a small ownership interest in the
partnership as an employee
compensatory award or incentive.
However, these commenters have not
provided detailed analyses and
suggestions as to how the employee
benefit and employment tax rules would
apply in such situations. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on the appropriate
application of the principles of Rev. Rul.
69–184 to tiered partnership situations,
the circumstances in which it may be
appropriate to permit partners to also be
employees of the partnership, and the
impact on employee benefit plans
(including, but not limited to, qualified
retirement plans, health and welfare
plans, and fringe benefit plans) and on
employment taxes if Rev. Rul. 69–184
were to be modified to permit partners
to also be employees in certain
circumstances.
In order to allow adequate time for
partnerships to make necessary payroll
and benefit plan adjustments, these
temporary regulations will apply on the
later of: (1) August 1, 2016, or (2) the
first day of the latest-starting plan year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
following May 4, 2016, of an affected
plan (based on the plans adopted before,
and the plan years in effect as of, May
4, 2016) sponsored by an entity that is
disregarded as an entity separate from
its owner for any purpose under
§ 301.7701–2. For these purposes, an
affected plan includes any qualified
plan, health plan, or section 125
cafeteria plan if the plan benefits
participants whose employment status
is affected by these regulations. For
rules that apply before the applicability
date of these regulations, see 26 CFR
part 301 revised as of April 1, 2016.
Special Analysis
Certain IRS regulations, including this
one, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory impact assessment is not
required. It has also been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations. For
applicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6),
please refer to the Special Analysis
section in the preamble to the crossreferenced notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Proposed Rules
section of this issue of the Federal
Register. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Code, these regulations were
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Andrew Holubeck of the
Office of the Division Counsel/Associate
Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
Government Entities). However, other
personnel from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Par. 2. Section 301.7701–2 is
amended by:
■ 1. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2).
■ 2. Adding paragraph (e)(8).
The revision and addition reads as
follows:
■
§ 301.7701–2
definitions.
Business entities;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) * * *
(C) * * *
(2) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 301.7701–2T(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(8) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 301.7701–2T(e)(8).
■ Par. 3. Section 301.7701–2T is added
to read as follows:
§ 301.7701–2T Business entities;
definitions (temporary).
(a) through (c)(2)(iv)(C)(1) [Reserved].
For further guidance, see § 301.7701–
2(a) through (c)(2)(iv)(C)(1).
(2) Section 301.7701–2(c)(2)(i) applies
to taxes imposed under subtitle A,
including Chapter 2—Tax on SelfEmployment Income. Thus, an entity
that is treated in the same manner as a
sole proprietorship under § 301.7701–
2(a) is not treated as a corporation for
purposes of employing its owner;
instead, the entity is disregarded as an
entity separate from its owner for this
purpose and is not the employer of its
owner. The owner will be subject to
self-employment tax on selfemployment income with respect to the
entity’s activities. Also, if a partnership
is the owner of an entity that is
disregarded as an entity separate from
its owner for any purpose under
§ 301.7701–2, the entity is not treated as
a corporation for purposes of employing
a partner of the partnership that owns
the entity; instead, the entity is
disregarded as an entity separate from
the partnership for this purpose and is
not the employer of any partner of the
partnership that owns the entity. A
partner of a partnership that owns an
entity that is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for any purpose
under § 301.7701–2 is subject to the
same self-employment tax rules as a
partner of a partnership that does not
own an entity that is disregarded as an
entity separate from its owner for any
purpose under § 301.7701–2.
(c)(2)(iv)(D) through (e)(7) [Reserved].
For further guidance, see § 301.7701–
2(c)(2)(iv)(D) through (e)(7).
(8)(i) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) of this section
applies on the later of—
(A) August 1, 2016, or
E:\FR\FM\04MYR1.SGM
04MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(B) The first day of the latest-starting
plan year following May 4, 2016, of an
affected plan (based on the plans
adopted before, and the plan years in
effect as of, May 4, 2016) sponsored by
an entity that is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for any purpose
under § 301.7701–2. For rules that apply
before the applicability date of these
regulations, see 26 CFR part 301 revised
as of April 1, 2016. For these purposes—
(1) An affected plan includes any
qualified plan, health plan, or section
125 cafeteria plan if the plan benefits
participants whose employment status
is affected by paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2),
(2) A qualified plan means a plan,
contract, pension, or trust described in
paragraph (A) or (B) of section 219(g)(5)
(other than paragraph (A)(iii)), and
(3) A health plan means an
arrangement described under § 1.105–5
of this chapter.
(ii) Expiration date. The applicability
of paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) of this
section expires on or before May 3,
2016, or such earlier date as may be
determined under amendments to the
regulations issued after May 3, 2016.
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: April 20, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–10383 Filed 5–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0306]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Cape Fear River;
Southport, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Cape Fear
River near Southport, North Carolina.
This temporary safety zone is intended
to restrict vessels from a portion of the
Cape Fear River during the Barrier
Island Challenge Stand Up Paddle
Board Race. This action is necessary to
protect the safety of race participants
when they cross the Lower Swash
Channel of the Cape Fear River. Entry
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 May 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
into or movement within the safety zone
during the enforcement period is
prohibited without approval of the
Captain of the Port.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 7,
2016, from 9:30 a.m. through 11:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0306 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LCDR Derek J. Burrill, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector
North Carolina, Coast Guard; telephone
(910) 772–2230, email Derek.J.Burrill@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because final
details of this event were not provided
until April 12, 2016, making it
impracticable to publish an NPRM.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to public interest
because immediate action is needed to
protect race participants and spectators
from the hazards associated with a
paddleboard race.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26695
Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the Barrier
Island Challenge Paddle Board Race on
May 07, 2016 will be a safety concern
when race participants cross the Lower
Swash Channel on the Cape Fear River,
Southport, North Carolina, a major
shipping channel. This rule is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in the navigable
waters within the safety zone.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone on the navigable
waters of the Lower Swash Channel on
the Cape Fear River. The safety zone
will encompass all waters within a
shape bounded by the following
coordinates: 33°55′05″ N., 078°00′04″
W.; 33°54′57″ N., 078°00′04″ W.;
33°54′56″ N., 078°00′54″ W.; 33°55′04″
N., 078°00′54″ W.; thence back to the
point of origin (NAD 83) in Southport,
North Carolina. This safety zone will be
established in the interest of public
safety due to the participants crossing
the Cape Fear River. This rule will be
enforced on May 07, 2016 during the
times of 9:30 a.m. through 11:30 a.m.,
unless otherwise cancelled earlier by
the COTP.
Except for vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or her
Representative, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the safety zone
during the time frame listed. The
Captain of the Port will give notice of
the enforcement of the safety zone by all
appropriate means to provide the widest
dissemination of notice among the
affected segments of the public. This
will include publication in the Local
Notice to Mariners and Marine
Information Broadcasts.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
E:\FR\FM\04MYR1.SGM
04MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26693-26695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9766]
RIN 1545-BM87
Self-Employment Tax Treatment of Partners in a Partnership That
Owns a Disregarded Entity
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final and temporary regulations that
clarify the employment tax treatment of partners in a partnership that
owns a disregarded entity. These regulations affect partners in a
partnership that owns a disregarded entity. The text of these temporary
regulations serves as the text of proposed regulations (REG-114307-15)
published in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Federal
Register.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on May 4, 2016.
Applicability date: For date of applicability, see Sec. 301-7701-
2T(e)(8).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew K. Holubeck at (202) 317-4774
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 301.7701-2(c)(2)(i) states that, except as otherwise
provided, a business entity that has a single owner and is not a
corporation under Sec. 301.7701-2(b) is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner (a disregarded entity). However, Sec.
301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(B) provides that an entity that is a disregarded
entity is treated as a corporation for purposes of employment taxes
imposed under subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
Therefore, the disregarded entity, rather than the owner, is considered
to be the employer of the entity's employees for purposes of employment
taxes imposed by subtitle C.
While Sec. 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(B) treats a disregarded entity as
a corporation for employment tax purposes, this rule does not apply for
self-employment tax purposes. Specifically, Sec. 301.7701-
2(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) provides that the general rule of Sec. 301.7701-
2(c)(2)(i) applies for self-employment tax purposes. After setting
forth this general rule, the regulation applies this rule in the
context of a single individual owner by stating that the owner of an
entity that is treated in the same manner as a sole proprietorship is
subject to tax on self-employment income. The regulation, at Sec.
301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(D), also includes an example that specifically
illustrates the mechanics of the rule. In the example, the disregarded
entity is subject to employment tax with respect to employees of the
disregarded entity. The individual owner, however, is subject to self-
employment tax on the net earnings from self-employment resulting from
the disregarded entity's activities. The regulations do not include a
separate example in which the disregarded entity is owned by a
partnership.
It has come to the attention of the Treasury Department and the IRS
that even though the regulations set forth a general rule that an
entity is disregarded as a separate entity from the owner for self-
employment tax purposes, some taxpayers may have read the current
regulations to permit the treatment of individual partners in a
partnership that owns a disregarded entity as employees of the
disregarded entity because the regulations did not include a specific
example applying the general rule in the partnership context. Under
this reading, which was not intended, some taxpayers have permitted
partners to participate in certain tax-favored employee benefit plans.
The Treasury Department and the IRS note that the regulations did not
create a distinction between a disregarded entity owned by an
individual (that is, a sole proprietorship) and a disregarded entity
owned by a partnership in the application of the self-employment tax
rule. Rather, Sec. 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) provides that the
general rule of Sec. 301.7701-2(c)(2)(i) applies for self-employment
tax purposes for any owner of a disregarded entity without carving out
an exception regarding a partnership that owns such a disregarded
entity. In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS do not believe
that the regulations alter the holding of Rev. Rul. 69-184, 1969-1 CB
256, which provides that: (1) Bona fide members of a partnership are
not employees of the partnership within the meaning of the Federal
Insurance Contributions Act, the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, and the
Collection of Income Tax at Source on Wages (chapters 21, 23, and 24,
respectively, subtitle C, Internal Revenue Code of 1954), and (2) such
a partner who devotes time and energy in the conduct of the trade or
business of the partnership, or in providing services to the
partnership as an independent contractor, is, in either event, a self-
employed individual rather than an individual who, under the usual
common law rules applicable in determining the employer-employee
relationship, has the status of an employee.
To address this issue, the Treasury Department and the IRS clarify
in these temporary regulations that the rule that a disregarded entity
is treated as a corporation for employment tax purposes does not apply
to the self-employment tax treatment of any individuals who are
partners in a partnership that owns a disregarded entity. The rule that
the entity is disregarded for self-employment tax purposes applies to
partners in the same way that it applies to a sole proprietor owner.
Accordingly, the partners are subject to the same self-employment tax
rules as partners in a partnership that does not own a disregarded
entity.
Explanation of Provisions
This document contains amendments to the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under section 7701 of the
Code to clarify that a disregarded entity that is treated as a
corporation for purposes of employment taxes imposed under subtitle C
of the
[[Page 26694]]
Code is not treated as a corporation for purposes of employing its
individual owner, who is treated as a sole proprietor, or employing an
individual that is a partner in a partnership that owns the disregarded
entity. Rather, the entity is disregarded as an entity separate from
its owner for this purpose. Existing regulations already provide that
the entity is disregarded for self-employment tax purposes and
specifically note that the owner of an entity treated in the same
manner as a sole proprietorship under Sec. 301.7701-2(a) is subject to
tax on self-employment income. These temporary regulations apply this
existing general rule to illustrate that, if a partnership is the owner
of a disregarded entity, the partners in the partnership are subject to
the same self-employment tax rules as partners in a partnership that
does not own a disregarded entity.
While these temporary regulations provide that a disregarded entity
owned by a partnership is not treated as a corporation for purposes of
employing any partner of the partnership, these regulations do not
address the application of Rev. Rul. 69-184 in tiered partnership
situations. Several commenters have requested that the IRS provide
additional guidance on the application of Rev. Rul. 69-184 to tiered
partnership situations, and have also suggested modifying the holding
of Rev. Rul. 69-184 to allow partnerships to treat partners as
employees in certain circumstances, such as, for example, employees in
a partnership who obtain a small ownership interest in the partnership
as an employee compensatory award or incentive. However, these
commenters have not provided detailed analyses and suggestions as to
how the employee benefit and employment tax rules would apply in such
situations. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the
appropriate application of the principles of Rev. Rul. 69-184 to tiered
partnership situations, the circumstances in which it may be
appropriate to permit partners to also be employees of the partnership,
and the impact on employee benefit plans (including, but not limited
to, qualified retirement plans, health and welfare plans, and fringe
benefit plans) and on employment taxes if Rev. Rul. 69-184 were to be
modified to permit partners to also be employees in certain
circumstances.
In order to allow adequate time for partnerships to make necessary
payroll and benefit plan adjustments, these temporary regulations will
apply on the later of: (1) August 1, 2016, or (2) the first day of the
latest-starting plan year following May 4, 2016, of an affected plan
(based on the plans adopted before, and the plan years in effect as of,
May 4, 2016) sponsored by an entity that is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for any purpose under Sec. 301.7701-2. For
these purposes, an affected plan includes any qualified plan, health
plan, or section 125 cafeteria plan if the plan benefits participants
whose employment status is affected by these regulations. For rules
that apply before the applicability date of these regulations, see 26
CFR part 301 revised as of April 1, 2016.
Special Analysis
Certain IRS regulations, including this one, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory impact assessment is
not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to
these regulations. For applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6), please refer to the Special Analysis section in
the preamble to the cross-referenced notice of proposed rulemaking in
the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these regulations were
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Andrew Holubeck of the
Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
Government Entities). However, other personnel from the IRS and the
Treasury Department participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 301.7701-2 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2).
0
2. Adding paragraph (e)(8).
The revision and addition reads as follows:
Sec. 301.7701-2 Business entities; definitions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) * * *
(C) * * *
(2) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 301.7701-
2T(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2).
* * * * *
(e)(8) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec. 301.7701-
2T(e)(8).
0
Par. 3. Section 301.7701-2T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.7701-2T Business entities; definitions (temporary).
(a) through (c)(2)(iv)(C)(1) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see
Sec. 301.7701-2(a) through (c)(2)(iv)(C)(1).
(2) Section 301.7701-2(c)(2)(i) applies to taxes imposed under
subtitle A, including Chapter 2--Tax on Self-Employment Income. Thus,
an entity that is treated in the same manner as a sole proprietorship
under Sec. 301.7701-2(a) is not treated as a corporation for purposes
of employing its owner; instead, the entity is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for this purpose and is not the employer of its
owner. The owner will be subject to self-employment tax on self-
employment income with respect to the entity's activities. Also, if a
partnership is the owner of an entity that is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for any purpose under Sec. 301.7701-2, the
entity is not treated as a corporation for purposes of employing a
partner of the partnership that owns the entity; instead, the entity is
disregarded as an entity separate from the partnership for this purpose
and is not the employer of any partner of the partnership that owns the
entity. A partner of a partnership that owns an entity that is
disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for any purpose under
Sec. 301.7701-2 is subject to the same self-employment tax rules as a
partner of a partnership that does not own an entity that is
disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for any purpose under
Sec. 301.7701-2.
(c)(2)(iv)(D) through (e)(7) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see
Sec. 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iv)(D) through (e)(7).
(8)(i) Effective/applicability date. Paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) of
this section applies on the later of--
(A) August 1, 2016, or
[[Page 26695]]
(B) The first day of the latest-starting plan year following May 4,
2016, of an affected plan (based on the plans adopted before, and the
plan years in effect as of, May 4, 2016) sponsored by an entity that is
disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for any purpose under
Sec. 301.7701-2. For rules that apply before the applicability date of
these regulations, see 26 CFR part 301 revised as of April 1, 2016. For
these purposes--
(1) An affected plan includes any qualified plan, health plan, or
section 125 cafeteria plan if the plan benefits participants whose
employment status is affected by paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(C)(2),
(2) A qualified plan means a plan, contract, pension, or trust
described in paragraph (A) or (B) of section 219(g)(5) (other than
paragraph (A)(iii)), and
(3) A health plan means an arrangement described under Sec. 1.105-
5 of this chapter.
(ii) Expiration date. The applicability of paragraph
(c)(2)(iv)(C)(2) of this section expires on or before May 3, 2016, or
such earlier date as may be determined under amendments to the
regulations issued after May 3, 2016.
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: April 20, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-10383 Filed 5-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P