Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment, 26792 [2016-10340]
Download as PDF
26792
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2016 / Notices
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality with
this collection of information.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this expiring information
collection after this comment period to
obtain the full, three year clearance from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The Commission is requesting
approval for a three year extension. The
rule sections approved under this
collections are 47 CFR 13.9, 13.13, 13.17
13.211 and 13.217. If the information
collection requirements were not kept or
fulfilled it is conceivable that examinees
could be overcharged and that fraud and
deceit could be used for unjust
enrichment of the examiners.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–10353 Filed 5–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 16–10]
Notice of Filing of Complaint and
Assignment
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc., Rush
Truck Centers of California, Inc., Rush Truck
Centers of Colorado, Inc., Rush Truck Centers
of Florida, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of
Georgia, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of Idaho,
Inc., Rush Truck Centers of Kansas, Inc.,
Rush Truck Centers of North Carolina, Inc.,
Rush Truck Centers of Ohio, Inc., Rush Truck
Centers of Oklahoma, Inc., Rush Truck
Centers of Texas, LP., Rush Truck Centers of
Utah, Inc., On Behalf of Themselves and All
others similarly situated V. Nippon Yusen
Kabushiki Kaisha, Nyk Line (North America)
Inc., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K.
Bulk Shipping (USA), Inc., World Logistics
¨
Service (USA) Inc., Hoegh Autoliners as,
¨
Hoegh Autoliners, Inc., Nissan Motor Car
Carriers Co. Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha,
Ltd., ‘‘K’’ Line America, Inc., Wallenius
Wilhelmsen Logistics as, Wallenius
Wilhelmsen Logistics Americas LLC, Eukor
˜´
Car Carriers Inc., CompaNıA Sud Americana
De Vapores S.A., and CSAV Agency North
America, LLC.
Notice is given that a Complaint has
been filed with the Federal Maritime
Commission (Commission) by the above
named Complainants, ‘‘on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly
situated, hereinafter ‘‘Complainants,’’
against the above named ‘‘providers of
Vehicle Carrier Services’’, hereinafter
‘‘Respondents.’’ The Complaint is
brought as a proposed class action.
Complainants ‘‘seek to represent classes
of truck and heavy equipment dealers in
approximately 30 states . . . who
purchased new Vehicles . . . that
included in their prices Vehicle Carrier
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 May 03, 2016
Jkt 238001
Services from any Respondent,
unnamed co-conspirator, or any current
or former subsidiary or affiliate thereof
. . . . ’’ Complainants allege that
Respondents ‘‘transport large numbers
of cars, medium- and heavy-duty trucks,
and other new, assembled motor
vehicles including buses, commercial
vehicles, construction equipment,
mining equipment, and agricultural
equipment . . . across oceans and other
large bodies of water using specialized
cargo ships known as Roll On-Roll Off
vessels (‘‘RoRos’’).’’
Complainants allege that Respondents
violated provisions of the Shipping Act
of 1984, including 46 U.S.C. 40302(a),
41102(b)(1), 41102(c), 41103(a)(1) and
(2), 41104(10), 41105(1) and (6), and the
Commission’s regulations at 46 CFR
535.401 et seq., because they
‘‘participated in a combination and
conspiracy to suppress and eliminate
competition in the Vehicle Carrier
Services market by agreeing to fix, raise,
stabilize and/or maintain the prices of,
and allocation [sic] the market and
customers for Vehicle Carrier Services
sold to Vehicle manufacturers (‘‘OEMs’’)
in the United States and elsewhere for
the import and export of new,
assembled Vehicles to and from the
United States.’’
Complainants request the following
relief:
‘‘(1) That Respondents be required to
answer the charges herein;
(2) That after due investigation and
hearing Respondents be found to have
violated 46 U.S.C. 40302(a), 41102(b)(l),
41102(c), 41103(a)(l) and (2), 41104(10),
41105(1) and (6), and 46 CFR 535.401,
et seq., and such other provisions as to
which violations may be proved
hereunder;
(3) The FMC determine that this
action may be maintained as a class
action under Rule 23(a), (b)(2) and (b)(3)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and direct that reasonable notice of this
action, as provided by Rule 23(c)(2) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, be
given to each and every member of the
Truck and Equipment Dealer Class;
(4) That Complainants be awarded
reparations in a sum to be proven under
46 U.S.C. 41305, with interest (46 U.S.C.
41305(a)) and reasonable attorneys’ fees
(46 U.S.C. 41305(b));
(5) That Complainants be awarded
double its proven actual injury under 46
U.S.C. 41305(c) because Respondents
and their co-conspirators violated 46
U.S.C. 41102(b) and 41105(1);
(6) That Respondents be found jointly
and severally liable for the conduct
alleged herein, including that of their
co-conspirators; and
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(7) That such other and further order
or orders be made as the FMC
determines to be proper.
The full text of the complaint can be
found in the Commission’s Electronic
Reading Room at www.fmc.gov/16-10.
This proceeding has been assigned to
the Office of Administrative Law Judges.
The initial decision of the presiding
officer in this proceeding shall be issued
by April 28, 2017 and the final decision
of the Commission shall be issued by
November 13, 2017.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–10340 Filed 5–3–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at (202)–523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012405.
Title: Crowley/Hoegh Space Charter
Agreement.
Parties: Crowley Latin America
Services, LLC and Hoegh Autoliners AS.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor LLP; 1200 Nineteenth
St. NW., Washington, DC 20036.
Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes
Hoegh to charter space to Crowley in the
trade between the U.S. Atlantic Coast
and ports in Panama.
Agreement No.: 012406.
Title: COSCON/PIL Slot Exchange
Agreement Asia—USWC.
Parties: COSCO Container Lines
Company, Limited and Pacific
International Lines (PTE) Ltd.
Filing Party: Eric. C. Jeffrey, Esq.;
Nixon Peabody LLP; 799 9th Street NW.,
Suite 500, Washington, DC 20001.
Synopsis: The agreement provides for
the exchange of slots between COSCON
and PIL on their respective services in
the trade between the United States
West Coast and China (including Hong
Kong), Korea, Malaysia, Singapore,
Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Togo, Ghana, Ivory
Coast, and Nigeria.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 26792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10340]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 16-10]
Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment
Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of
California, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of Colorado, Inc., Rush Truck
Centers of Florida, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of Georgia, Inc., Rush
Truck Centers of Idaho, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of Kansas, Inc.,
Rush Truck Centers of North Carolina, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of
Ohio, Inc., Rush Truck Centers of Oklahoma, Inc., Rush Truck Centers
of Texas, LP., Rush Truck Centers of Utah, Inc., On Behalf of
Themselves and All others similarly situated V. Nippon Yusen
Kabushiki Kaisha, Nyk Line (North America) Inc., Mitsui O.S.K.
Lines, Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Bulk Shipping (USA), Inc., World
Logistics Service (USA) Inc., H[ouml]egh Autoliners as, H[ouml]egh
Autoliners, Inc., Nissan Motor Car Carriers Co. Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen
Kaisha, Ltd., ``K'' Line America, Inc., Wallenius Wilhelmsen
Logistics as, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics Americas LLC, Eukor Car
Carriers Inc., Compa[Ntilde][iacute]A Sud Americana De Vapores S.A.,
and CSAV Agency North America, LLC.
Notice is given that a Complaint has been filed with the Federal
Maritime Commission (Commission) by the above named Complainants, ``on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, hereinafter
``Complainants,'' against the above named ``providers of Vehicle
Carrier Services'', hereinafter ``Respondents.'' The Complaint is
brought as a proposed class action. Complainants ``seek to represent
classes of truck and heavy equipment dealers in approximately 30 states
. . . who purchased new Vehicles . . . that included in their prices
Vehicle Carrier Services from any Respondent, unnamed co-conspirator,
or any current or former subsidiary or affiliate thereof . . . . ''
Complainants allege that Respondents ``transport large numbers of cars,
medium- and heavy-duty trucks, and other new, assembled motor vehicles
including buses, commercial vehicles, construction equipment, mining
equipment, and agricultural equipment . . . across oceans and other
large bodies of water using specialized cargo ships known as Roll On-
Roll Off vessels (``RoRos'').''
Complainants allege that Respondents violated provisions of the
Shipping Act of 1984, including 46 U.S.C. 40302(a), 41102(b)(1),
41102(c), 41103(a)(1) and (2), 41104(10), 41105(1) and (6), and the
Commission's regulations at 46 CFR 535.401 et seq., because they
``participated in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and
eliminate competition in the Vehicle Carrier Services market by
agreeing to fix, raise, stabilize and/or maintain the prices of, and
allocation [sic] the market and customers for Vehicle Carrier Services
sold to Vehicle manufacturers (``OEMs'') in the United States and
elsewhere for the import and export of new, assembled Vehicles to and
from the United States.''
Complainants request the following relief:
``(1) That Respondents be required to answer the charges herein;
(2) That after due investigation and hearing Respondents be found
to have violated 46 U.S.C. 40302(a), 41102(b)(l), 41102(c), 41103(a)(l)
and (2), 41104(10), 41105(1) and (6), and 46 CFR 535.401, et seq., and
such other provisions as to which violations may be proved hereunder;
(3) The FMC determine that this action may be maintained as a class
action under Rule 23(a), (b)(2) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, and direct that reasonable notice of this action, as
provided by Rule 23(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, be
given to each and every member of the Truck and Equipment Dealer Class;
(4) That Complainants be awarded reparations in a sum to be proven
under 46 U.S.C. 41305, with interest (46 U.S.C. 41305(a)) and
reasonable attorneys' fees (46 U.S.C. 41305(b));
(5) That Complainants be awarded double its proven actual injury
under 46 U.S.C. 41305(c) because Respondents and their co-conspirators
violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(b) and 41105(1);
(6) That Respondents be found jointly and severally liable for the
conduct alleged herein, including that of their co-conspirators; and
(7) That such other and further order or orders be made as the FMC
determines to be proper.
The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's
Electronic Reading Room at www.fmc.gov/16-10.
This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative
Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding officer in this
proceeding shall be issued by April 28, 2017 and the final decision of
the Commission shall be issued by November 13, 2017.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-10340 Filed 5-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P