Agency Information Collection Activities: 30 Day Extension of a Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection, 26616-26618 [2016-10296]
Download as PDF
26616
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Notices
Respondents: Approximately 118,000
annually.
Frequency: Information is collected
on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 1.5 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
177,000 hours.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 27,
2016.
Ronda Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Performance, Policy, and Records
Management Branch, ASP–110.
[FR Doc. 2016–10344 Filed 5–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of
Information Collection: Bird/Other
Wildlife Strike Report
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our
intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval to renew a previously
approved information collection.
Wildlife strike data are collected to
develop standards and monitor hazards
to aviation.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by July 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA
at the following address: Ronda
Thompson, Room 441, Federal Aviation
Administration, ASP–110, 950 L’Enfant
Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for FAA’s
performance; (b) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be
minimized without reducing the quality
of the collected information. The agency
will summarize and/or include your
comments in the request for OMB’s
clearance of this information collection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronda Thompson by email at:
Ronda.Thompson@faa.gov.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 May 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
OMB
Control Number: 2120–0045.
Title: Bird/Other Wildlife Strike
Report.
Form Numbers: FAA Form 5200–7.
Type of Review: Renewal of an
information collection.
Background: 14 CFR 139.337—
Wildlife Hazard Management requires
that wildlife strike data is collected to
develop standards and monitor hazards
to aviation. Data identify wildlife strike
control requirements and provide inservice data on aircraft component
failure. The FAA form 5200–7, Bird/
Other Wildlife Strike Report, is most
often completed by the pilot-in-charge
of an aircraft involved in a wildlife
collision or by Air Traffic Control Tower
personnel, or other airline or airport
personnel who have knowledge of the
incident.
Respondents: Approximately 7,666
pilots, air traffic control personnel, or
other airline or airport personnel.
Frequency: Information is collected as
needed.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: 5 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 613
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 27,
2016.
Ronda Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Performance, Policy, and Records
Management Branch, ASP–110.
[FR Doc. 2016–10347 Filed 5–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2016–0010]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: 30 Day Extension of a
Notice of Request for Approval of a
New Information Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: REVISION of a Notice of
Request for Approval of a New
Information Collection.
AGENCY:
The FHWA invited public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) approval of a new information
collection that is summarized below
under supplementary information. The
FHWA also invites public comments on
the design of the survey instrument and
questions for the National
Transportation Performance
Management (TPM) Review Survey. A
document containing the draft survey
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and survey design report is available at
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/engage/
docs/questions.pdf. FHWA has received
a request to extend the comment period
in order to provide more time to
evaluate the proposed revisions. FHWA
is extending the comment period to May
31, 2016. We published a Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day public
comment period on this information
collection on June 23, 2015. We are
required to publish this notice in the
Federal Register by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by May
31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention DOT Desk Officer. You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
All comments should include the
Docket No. FHWA–2016–0010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Nesbitt (michael.nesbitt@
dot.gov), 202–366–1179, Office of
Infrastructure, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Transportation
Performance Management (TPM)
Implementation Review, TPM Toolbox,
and TPM State-of-Practice
Questionnaires.
Type of request: New information
collection requirement.
Background: Moving The Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
(MAP–21) Act and the subsequent
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
Act (FAST Act) transformed the
Federal-aid highway program by
establishing new requirements for
transportation performance management
to ensure the most efficient investment
of Federal transportation funds.
Transportation performance
management increases the
accountability and transparency of the
Federal-aid highway program and
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Notices
provides for a framework to support
improved investment decision making
through a focus on performance
outcomes for key national transportation
goals. State transportation agencies
(STAs) will be expected to use the
information and data generated as a
result of the new regulations to make
better informed transportation planning
and programming decisions. The new
performance aspects of the Federal-aid
program will allow FHWA to better
communicate a national performance
story and to more reliably assess the
impacts of Federal funding investments.
Under the ‘‘National Transportation
Performance Management (TPM)
Implementation Review Survey, TPM
State-of-Practice Questionnaires, and
TPM Toolbox’’ information collection
request (ICR), the FHWA will collect
information on the current state of the
practice, data, methods, and systems
used by State, metropolitan, regional,
local, and/or tribal transportation
entities to support their TPM processes
in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 119, 134–
135, and 148–150, as amended by MAP–
21 and the FAST Act. This information
will also be used to develop and deliver
existing and future Federal Highway
Programs through successful
partnerships, value-added stewardship,
and risk-based oversight. Underpinning
this effort will be a robust focus on
improving FHWA and its partners’
capacity to implement performance
provisions. The information collected
from these activities will translate into
having a better skilled workforce,
effective supporting systems, and
clearly articulated programs that are
optimally positioned and equipped to
deliver the FHWA’s mission. In general,
the components of the ‘‘National TPM
Implementation Review Survey, TPM
State-of-Practice Questionnaires, and
TPM Toolbox’’ will involve questions
related to:
1. TPM related implementation
efforts, programs, and activities,
2. Needs for TPM guidance and policy
concerning MAP–21 and FAST
provisions;
3. TPM capacity building needs;
4. Effectiveness implementing
performance based planning and
programming and TPM processes.
The most consequential activity covered
by this ICR is the ‘‘National TPM
Implementation Review Survey,’’ which
is scheduled to be administered in 2016
and again several years later.
Overview:
In the summer of 2015, the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA)
published the National TPM
Implementation Review Survey and
Information Collection Request, Docket
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 May 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
FHWA–2015–0013. In that 60-day
Federal Register Notice (FRN), FHWA
stated it would administer the first
National TPM Implementation Review
Survey in 2016 to establish a baseline
and assess:
1. FHWA and its partners’ progress
implementing MAP–21 performance
provisions and related TPM best
practices; and
2. The effectiveness of performancebased planning and programming
processes and transportation
performance management.
In that FRN, FHWA also stated that a
second National TPM Implementation
Review Survey will be conducted
several years after the first to assess
FHWA and its partners’ progress in
addressing any gaps or issues identified
during the first survey. The findings
from the first review survey will be used
in a pair of statutory reports to Congress
due in 2017 on the effectiveness of
performance-based planning,
programming processes, and
transportation performance management
(23 U.S.C. 119, 134(l)(2), and 135(h)(2)).
The findings from the second survey
will be used in a subsequent follow-up
report. It is important to note that this
is not a compliance review. The overall
focus of the National TPM
Implementation Review Survey is on
the TPM and performance-based
planning processes and practices used
by STAs and MPOs, not the
performance outcomes of those
processes.
FHWA received 20 comment letters
and over 24 unique comments. While a
number of concerns were expressed by
the commenters, they generally
supported the information collection
request outlined in the FRN. Regarding
the National TPM Implementation
Review Survey, stakeholders were most
concerned about the estimated burden
of effort and time for administration of
the survey. Based on those specific
comments to the docket, it became clear
that a majority of responding States,
MPOs, and their respective associations
want FHWA to: (1) ‘‘coordinate with
stakeholders when developing’’ the
design of any TPM surveys,
questionnaires, or related instruments;
(2) Provide more information on the
type of questions to be asked as part of
the National TPM Implementation
Review Survey and any State-of-Practice
Questionnaires; (3) Minimize the
burden of effort to the greatest extent
practicable; (4) Delay administration of
National TPM Implementation Review
Survey until after the final rulemakings;
and (5) Share data from the National
TPM Implementation Review Survey
with States, MPOs, and their respective
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26617
associations to support the development
of federally and state funded TPM
capacity building efforts.
To address the first three concerns
listed in the preceding paragraph,
stakeholders can provide input on the
design of National TPM Implementation
Review Survey by:
1. Submitting comments on the draft
survey questions and survey design
report to the docket.
2. Participating in one of two webinar
listening sessions on the design of the
National TPM Implementation Review
Survey. The date and time of these
webinars will be advertised at
www.fhwa.dot.gov/TPM. To receive an
email notification announcing the date
and time of these webinar listening
sessions, please visit www.fhwa.dot.gov/
TPM and subscribe to email updates.
To address the concern on the timing
of the National TPM Implementation
Review Survey, FHWA decided to delay
administering the review until after
publication of the Statewide and
Nonmetropolitan Transportation
Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning Final Rulemaking.
In addition to the more formal
National TPM Implementation Review
Survey, FHWA will conduct informal
voluntary TPM State-of-Practice
Questionnaires related to ongoing TPM
policy and guidance, technical
assistance, and capacity needs. To
address concerns expressed by
stakeholders regarding the burden of
effort and administration of these
additional questionnaires, FHWA is
proposing to sequence the National
TPM Implementation Review Survey
and other State-of-the-Practice
Questionnaires on a biennial cycle.
Under this biennial cycle, the first
National TPM Implementation Review
Survey would be administered in 2016
and the follow-up in 2020. The smaller,
less formal State-of-the-Practice
Questionnaires would be administered
in 2018 and 2022. The State-of-thePractice Questionnaires are essential to
helping FHWA coordinate with its
many stakeholders to reduce duplicative
survey efforts as the industry works to
implement and understand the TPM
practices.
Under this sequencing, the National
TPM Implementation Review Survey
will continue to serve the original
purpose of allowing FHWA to evaluate
the effectiveness of efforts to implement
TPM and PBPP. The State-of-thePractice Questionnaires will enable
FHWA and its stakeholders to
coordinate the collection of information
necessary to advance the state-of-thepractice and further TPM capacity
building efforts. This approach limits
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
26618
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Notices
the number of TPM related surveys to 4
over a number of years:
• National TPM Implementation
Review Survey (Baseline): 2016
• State-of-the-Practice Questionnaires:
2018
• National TPM Implementation
Review Survey (Follow-up): 2020
• State-of-the-Practice Questionnaires:
2022
After each survey or questionnaire,
FHWA and its stakeholders will explore
how to better align the information
collection requests with yet-to-be
determined performance management
reporting processes. The information
will be collected from State,
metropolitan, regional, local, and/or
tribal transportation agencies via
internet-based questionnaires or web
applications and will be used to help
FHWA and its partner organizations do
the following:
• Strategically plan to meet ever
growing demand for TPM technical
assistance needs;
• Develop and refine TPM policy and
guidance based on stakeholder
feedback;
• Channel resources to meet capacity
development and training needs; and
• Identify and prioritize TPM
research needs.
Lastly, as part of FHWA’s ongoing
technical assistance efforts, a TPM
Toolbox is being created to help
FHWA’s partners self-assess and
benchmark their TPM implementation
progress, capabilities, and gaps. The
TPM Toolbox will also help FHWA
streamline the integration and
administration of all the efforts
described above. To maximize the
effectiveness and efficiency of the TPM
Toolbox, FHWA will collect business
contact and organizational demographic
(size of organization, location, etc.)
information along with the responses
submitted as part of the TPM Toolbox’s
self-assessment applications.
Respondents: The 975 respondents
estimate is based on soliciting input
from 52 STA, 409 MPOS, and a
sampling of other State and local
transportation entities. In most cases,
only STAs and MPOs will be surveyed.
Frequency: Agencies will be solicited
to provide information via a survey 1
time every two years. Additionally,
transportation agencies may submit
information more frequently by using
the TPM Toolbox’s self-assessment tool.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: The estimated average annual
burden hours is up to 20 hours per
response during a year with a survey/
questionnaire request.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: The estimated total annual
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 May 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
burden hours for all respondents is
estimated to be 19,500 burden hours
(975 respondents × 20 burden hours) per
year with survey/questionnaire requests.
Professional Staff Time during a
Survey Year:
• 20 hours/respondent × 975
respondents × 1 questionnaire during a
survey year = 19,500 hours.
Clerical Staff Time during a Survey
Year:
• 2 hours/respondent × 975
respondents × 1 questionnaire during a
survey year = 1,950 hours.
The aggregated associated salary cost
to all respondents (975) during a survey
year is estimated to be $1,032,213 based
on an average salary of $38 per hour
(approximately $79,000 per year) for
professional staff and $18 per hour
(approximately $37,000 per year) for
clerical staff. Disaggregated, the total
average annual cost per respondent
during a survey year is estimated to be
$1,058.68. The burden hours and costs
are illustrated below.
Professional Staff Cost during a
Survey Year:
• All respondents: 19,500 hours × $38
per hour = $741,000.
Æ Per respondent: (20 × $38 = $760).
Clerical Staff Cost during a Survey
Year:
• All respondents: 1,950 hours × $18
per hour = $35,100.
Æ Per respondent (2 hours × $18 per
hour = $36).
Total Annual Cost during a Survey
Year:
• Subtotal Direct Salaries
(Professional + Clerical) $776,100.
• Overhead/fringe benefits at 33%:
$256,113.
• Total annual respondents cost
during survey year: $1,032,213.
Æ Total average annual cost per
respondent during survey year:
$1,058.68.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the U.S.
DOT’s performance, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the U.S.
DOT’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the collected information;
and (4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: April 27, 2016.
Michael Howell,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–10296 Filed 5–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on Transportation Project in
Washington State
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA
and Other Federal Agencies.
AGENCY:
This notice announces actions
taken by the FHWA and other Federal
agencies that are final within the
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
actions relate to the I–5 interchange
with NW., 319th Street/La Center Road
(La Center Interchange Improvements)
Project in the State of Washington. The
action by FHWA is the Record of
Decision (ROD) that selects
improvements to the I–5 La Center
Interchange as traffic mitigation
measures for construction of the Cowlitz
Reservation Development. The Cowlitz
Reservation Development was the
subject of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) ROD of April 2013. Actions by
other Federal agencies include issuing
amendments to previously issued
permits.
DATES: By this notice, FHWA is advising
the public of final Agency actions
subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim
seeking judicial review of the Federal
agency actions on the listed highway
project will be barred unless the claim
is filed on or before September 30, 2016.
If the Federal law that authorizes
judicial review of a claim provides a
time period of less than 150 days for
filing such claim, then that shorter time
period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
FHWA, contact Liana Liu, Area
Engineer, North Central and South
Central Region, Federal Highway
Administration, 711 South Capital Way,
Suite 501, Olympia, WA 98501–0943,
telephone at 360–753–9553, or via email
at Liana.Liu@dot.gov. Regular office
hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
p.t., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. For Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT),
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26616-26618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10296]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2016-0010]
Agency Information Collection Activities: 30 Day Extension of a
Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: REVISION of a Notice of Request for Approval of a New
Information Collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA invited public comments about our intention to
request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of a new
information collection that is summarized below under supplementary
information. The FHWA also invites public comments on the design of the
survey instrument and questions for the National Transportation
Performance Management (TPM) Review Survey. A document containing the
draft survey and survey design report is available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/engage/docs/questions.pdf. FHWA has received a
request to extend the comment period in order to provide more time to
evaluate the proposed revisions. FHWA is extending the comment period
to May 31, 2016. We published a Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
public comment period on this information collection on June 23, 2015.
We are required to publish this notice in the Federal Register by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by May 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention DOT Desk Officer.
You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection,
including: (1) Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the
FHWA's performance; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways
for the FHWA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
collected information; and (4) ways that the burden could be minimized,
including the use of electronic technology, without reducing the
quality of the collected information. All comments should include the
Docket No. FHWA-2016-0010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Nesbitt
(michael.nesbitt@dot.gov), 202-366-1179, Office of Infrastructure,
Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Transportation Performance Management (TPM)
Implementation Review, TPM Toolbox, and TPM State-of-Practice
Questionnaires.
Type of request: New information collection requirement.
Background: Moving The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century (MAP-21) Act and the subsequent Fixing America's Surface
Transportation Act (FAST Act) transformed the Federal-aid highway
program by establishing new requirements for transportation performance
management to ensure the most efficient investment of Federal
transportation funds. Transportation performance management increases
the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program
and
[[Page 26617]]
provides for a framework to support improved investment decision making
through a focus on performance outcomes for key national transportation
goals. State transportation agencies (STAs) will be expected to use the
information and data generated as a result of the new regulations to
make better informed transportation planning and programming decisions.
The new performance aspects of the Federal-aid program will allow FHWA
to better communicate a national performance story and to more reliably
assess the impacts of Federal funding investments.
Under the ``National Transportation Performance Management (TPM)
Implementation Review Survey, TPM State-of-Practice Questionnaires, and
TPM Toolbox'' information collection request (ICR), the FHWA will
collect information on the current state of the practice, data,
methods, and systems used by State, metropolitan, regional, local, and/
or tribal transportation entities to support their TPM processes in
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 119, 134-135, and 148-150, as amended by MAP-
21 and the FAST Act. This information will also be used to develop and
deliver existing and future Federal Highway Programs through successful
partnerships, value-added stewardship, and risk-based oversight.
Underpinning this effort will be a robust focus on improving FHWA and
its partners' capacity to implement performance provisions. The
information collected from these activities will translate into having
a better skilled workforce, effective supporting systems, and clearly
articulated programs that are optimally positioned and equipped to
deliver the FHWA's mission. In general, the components of the
``National TPM Implementation Review Survey, TPM State-of-Practice
Questionnaires, and TPM Toolbox'' will involve questions related to:
1. TPM related implementation efforts, programs, and activities,
2. Needs for TPM guidance and policy concerning MAP-21 and FAST
provisions;
3. TPM capacity building needs;
4. Effectiveness implementing performance based planning and
programming and TPM processes.
The most consequential activity covered by this ICR is the ``National
TPM Implementation Review Survey,'' which is scheduled to be
administered in 2016 and again several years later.
Overview:
In the summer of 2015, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
published the National TPM Implementation Review Survey and Information
Collection Request, Docket FHWA-2015-0013. In that 60-day Federal
Register Notice (FRN), FHWA stated it would administer the first
National TPM Implementation Review Survey in 2016 to establish a
baseline and assess:
1. FHWA and its partners' progress implementing MAP-21 performance
provisions and related TPM best practices; and
2. The effectiveness of performance-based planning and programming
processes and transportation performance management.
In that FRN, FHWA also stated that a second National TPM
Implementation Review Survey will be conducted several years after the
first to assess FHWA and its partners' progress in addressing any gaps
or issues identified during the first survey. The findings from the
first review survey will be used in a pair of statutory reports to
Congress due in 2017 on the effectiveness of performance-based
planning, programming processes, and transportation performance
management (23 U.S.C. 119, 134(l)(2), and 135(h)(2)). The findings from
the second survey will be used in a subsequent follow-up report. It is
important to note that this is not a compliance review. The overall
focus of the National TPM Implementation Review Survey is on the TPM
and performance-based planning processes and practices used by STAs and
MPOs, not the performance outcomes of those processes.
FHWA received 20 comment letters and over 24 unique comments. While
a number of concerns were expressed by the commenters, they generally
supported the information collection request outlined in the FRN.
Regarding the National TPM Implementation Review Survey, stakeholders
were most concerned about the estimated burden of effort and time for
administration of the survey. Based on those specific comments to the
docket, it became clear that a majority of responding States, MPOs, and
their respective associations want FHWA to: (1) ``coordinate with
stakeholders when developing'' the design of any TPM surveys,
questionnaires, or related instruments; (2) Provide more information on
the type of questions to be asked as part of the National TPM
Implementation Review Survey and any State-of-Practice Questionnaires;
(3) Minimize the burden of effort to the greatest extent practicable;
(4) Delay administration of National TPM Implementation Review Survey
until after the final rulemakings; and (5) Share data from the National
TPM Implementation Review Survey with States, MPOs, and their
respective associations to support the development of federally and
state funded TPM capacity building efforts.
To address the first three concerns listed in the preceding
paragraph, stakeholders can provide input on the design of National TPM
Implementation Review Survey by:
1. Submitting comments on the draft survey questions and survey
design report to the docket.
2. Participating in one of two webinar listening sessions on the
design of the National TPM Implementation Review Survey. The date and
time of these webinars will be advertised at www.fhwa.dot.gov/TPM. To
receive an email notification announcing the date and time of these
webinar listening sessions, please visit www.fhwa.dot.gov/TPM and
subscribe to email updates.
To address the concern on the timing of the National TPM
Implementation Review Survey, FHWA decided to delay administering the
review until after publication of the Statewide and Nonmetropolitan
Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning Final
Rulemaking.
In addition to the more formal National TPM Implementation Review
Survey, FHWA will conduct informal voluntary TPM State-of-Practice
Questionnaires related to ongoing TPM policy and guidance, technical
assistance, and capacity needs. To address concerns expressed by
stakeholders regarding the burden of effort and administration of these
additional questionnaires, FHWA is proposing to sequence the National
TPM Implementation Review Survey and other State-of-the-Practice
Questionnaires on a biennial cycle. Under this biennial cycle, the
first National TPM Implementation Review Survey would be administered
in 2016 and the follow-up in 2020. The smaller, less formal State-of-
the-Practice Questionnaires would be administered in 2018 and 2022. The
State-of-the-Practice Questionnaires are essential to helping FHWA
coordinate with its many stakeholders to reduce duplicative survey
efforts as the industry works to implement and understand the TPM
practices.
Under this sequencing, the National TPM Implementation Review
Survey will continue to serve the original purpose of allowing FHWA to
evaluate the effectiveness of efforts to implement TPM and PBPP. The
State-of-the-Practice Questionnaires will enable FHWA and its
stakeholders to coordinate the collection of information necessary to
advance the state-of-the-practice and further TPM capacity building
efforts. This approach limits
[[Page 26618]]
the number of TPM related surveys to 4 over a number of years:
National TPM Implementation Review Survey (Baseline): 2016
State-of-the-Practice Questionnaires: 2018
National TPM Implementation Review Survey (Follow-up): 2020
State-of-the-Practice Questionnaires: 2022
After each survey or questionnaire, FHWA and its stakeholders will
explore how to better align the information collection requests with
yet-to-be determined performance management reporting processes. The
information will be collected from State, metropolitan, regional,
local, and/or tribal transportation agencies via internet-based
questionnaires or web applications and will be used to help FHWA and
its partner organizations do the following:
Strategically plan to meet ever growing demand for TPM
technical assistance needs;
Develop and refine TPM policy and guidance based on
stakeholder feedback;
Channel resources to meet capacity development and
training needs; and
Identify and prioritize TPM research needs.
Lastly, as part of FHWA's ongoing technical assistance efforts, a
TPM Toolbox is being created to help FHWA's partners self-assess and
benchmark their TPM implementation progress, capabilities, and gaps.
The TPM Toolbox will also help FHWA streamline the integration and
administration of all the efforts described above. To maximize the
effectiveness and efficiency of the TPM Toolbox, FHWA will collect
business contact and organizational demographic (size of organization,
location, etc.) information along with the responses submitted as part
of the TPM Toolbox's self-assessment applications.
Respondents: The 975 respondents estimate is based on soliciting
input from 52 STA, 409 MPOS, and a sampling of other State and local
transportation entities. In most cases, only STAs and MPOs will be
surveyed.
Frequency: Agencies will be solicited to provide information via a
survey 1 time every two years. Additionally, transportation agencies
may submit information more frequently by using the TPM Toolbox's self-
assessment tool.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: The estimated average annual
burden hours is up to 20 hours per response during a year with a
survey/questionnaire request.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: The estimated total annual
burden hours for all respondents is estimated to be 19,500 burden hours
(975 respondents x 20 burden hours) per year with survey/questionnaire
requests.
Professional Staff Time during a Survey Year:
20 hours/respondent x 975 respondents x 1 questionnaire
during a survey year = 19,500 hours.
Clerical Staff Time during a Survey Year:
2 hours/respondent x 975 respondents x 1 questionnaire
during a survey year = 1,950 hours.
The aggregated associated salary cost to all respondents (975)
during a survey year is estimated to be $1,032,213 based on an average
salary of $38 per hour (approximately $79,000 per year) for
professional staff and $18 per hour (approximately $37,000 per year)
for clerical staff. Disaggregated, the total average annual cost per
respondent during a survey year is estimated to be $1,058.68. The
burden hours and costs are illustrated below.
Professional Staff Cost during a Survey Year:
All respondents: 19,500 hours x $38 per hour = $741,000.
[cir] Per respondent: (20 x $38 = $760).
Clerical Staff Cost during a Survey Year:
All respondents: 1,950 hours x $18 per hour = $35,100.
[cir] Per respondent (2 hours x $18 per hour = $36).
Total Annual Cost during a Survey Year:
Subtotal Direct Salaries (Professional + Clerical)
$776,100.
Overhead/fringe benefits at 33%: $256,113.
Total annual respondents cost during survey year:
$1,032,213.
[cir] Total average annual cost per respondent during survey year:
$1,058.68.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the U.S. DOT's performance,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the U.S. DOT's estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (3) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that the burden
could be minimized, including the use of electronic technology, without
reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will
summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: April 27, 2016.
Michael Howell,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-10296 Filed 5-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P