Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed eCollection; eComments Requested Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC), 25717-25718 [2016-10059]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2016 / Notices
Court for the Middle District of
Louisiana in the lawsuit titled United
States and Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality v. ORB
Exploration, LLC, Civil Action No. 16–
260–JJB–RLB.
This case concerns three oil spills,
one in 2013 and two in 2015, at
locations in the Atchafalaya River Basin,
from oil production facilities owned and
operated by ORB Exploration, LLC
(ORB), as well as ORB’s failure to
comply with a Coast Guard order issued
during the cleanup of one of the spills
or with certain Spill Prevention,
Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC)
regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency under
the CWA. The largest spill occurred in
2013 at ORB’s facilities located at Frog
Lake in Iberville Parish, near Baton
Rouge, Louisiana, when a corroded
transfer pipeline ruptured and spilled a
large amount of crude oil, estimated at
more than 1,000 barrels, into a flooded
wetland area. The second spill occurred
in September of 2015, also at ORB’s
Frog Lake facilities. The third spill
occurred in October of 2015 at an ORB
facility at Crocodile Bayou in St. Martin
Parish, Louisiana. The SPCC violations
were discovered during a May 2015
inspection of ORB’s oil storage barge at
Frog Lake.
In the Complaint, the United States
alleges violations of Sections 301(a),
311(b)(7)(A) or (D), 311(b)(7)(B)(ii) and
311(b)(7)(C) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.
1311(a), 1321(b)(7)(A) or (D),
1321(b)(7)(B)(ii), and 1321(b)(7)(C). In
addition, the Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ) alleges
violations of La. R. S. 30:2076(A)(1) and
(3), and Louisiana Administrative Code
sections 33:IX.501.A, 33:IX.1701.B,
33:I.3915.A.3, and 33:I.3925.A, for the
discharges of oil and ORB’s failures to
file a timely report or provide updated
notice to the state hotline for reporting
spills. The Complaint seeks the
assessment of civil penalties, State
response costs, and injunctive relief for
the alleged violations. The proposed
Consent Decree resolves the civil
penalty, State response cost, and
injunctive relief claims of the United
States and LDEQ for the causes of action
alleged in the Complaint by requiring
ORB to perform corrective measures
focused on spill detection and
prevention and pay federal civil
penalties of $615,000 and State civil
penalties and response costs of
$100,000.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Apr 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States and Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality v.
ORB Exploration, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–
5–1–1–11281. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department Web site: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
proposed Consent Decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $7.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Jeffrey K. Sands,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–10105 Filed 4–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121–0219]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed eCollection;
eComments Requested Extension,
Without Change, of a Currently
Approved Collection Juvenile
Residential Facility Census (JRFC)
Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, Office of
Justice Programs.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention, will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25717
Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until May 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Brecht Donoghue, (202) 305–
1270, Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, Office of
Justice Programs, U.S. Department of
Justice, 810 Seventh Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20531. Written
comments and/or suggestions can also
be directed to the Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention
Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_
submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
DATES:
Overview of this information
collection:
(1) Type of information collection:
Extension, without change, of a
currently approved collection.
(2) The title of the form/collection:
Juvenile Residential Facility Census.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form number is CJ–15, Office of
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention, United States Department of
Justice.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
25718
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2016 / Notices
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Federal Government,
State, Local or Tribal. Other: Not-forprofit institutions; Business or other forprofit.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that 2,429
respondents will complete a 2-hour
questionnaire.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: Approximately 4,858 hours.
If additional information is required,
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: April 26, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–10059 Filed 4–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Justice
[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1709]
Draft Test Procedures for the Gun
Safety Technology Challenge
National Institute of Justice,
Office of Justice, Programs, Department
of Justice.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The National Institute of
Justice (NIJ) seeks feedback from the
public on the draft test procedures
developed for the Gun Safety
Technology Challenge, published here:
https://www.nij.gov/funding/pages/fy16gun-safety-challenge.aspx. The
document describes test methods to
provide a basis to determine whether
the addition of a smart gun technology
does or does not significantly reduce the
reliability of the firearm system
compared to existing firearms.
DATES: Comments must be received by
5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2016.
How to Respond and What to Include:
The draft test procedures document in
both Word and pdf formats can be found
here: https://www.nij.gov/funding/pages/
fy16-gun-safety-challenge.aspx. To
submit comments, please send an email
to gunsafetytechnology@usdoj.gov.
Please indicate the page number, section
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Apr 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
number, and the line number associated
with each comment. Comments may
also be provided as a markup of the
Word document. Please provide contact
information with the submission of
comments.
NIJ was
tasked with supporting the President’s
Plan to Reduce Gun Violence,
specifically:
‘‘The President is directing the
Attorney General to work with
technology experts to review existing
and emerging gun safety technologies,
and to issue a report on the availability
and use of those technologies. In
addition, the Administration will issue
a challenge to the private sector to
develop innovative and cost-effective
gun safety technology and provide
prizes for those technologies that are
proven to be reliable and effective.’’
In support of this Executive action,
NIJ has conducted a technology
assessment and market survey of
existing and emerging gun safety
technologies that would be of interest to
the law enforcement and criminal
justice communities and others with an
interest in gun safety and advanced
firearm technology. These firearms or
firearms accessories can be understood
to use integrated components that
exclusively permit an authorized user or
set of users to operate or fire the gun
and automatically deactivate it under a
set of specific circumstances, reducing
the chances of accidental or purposeful
use by an unauthorized user. The
integrated gun safety technology may
include different authentication
technologies, such as radio frequency
identification and fingerprint sensors.
A report published in June 2013 by
NIJ entitled A Review of Gun Safety
Technologies (https://www.ncjrs.gov/
pdffiles1/nij/242500.pdf) examined
existing and emerging gun safety
technologies, and their availability and
use, to provide a comprehensive
perspective on firearms with integrated
advanced safety technologies. Following
the report, NIJ published a Federal
Register Notice (https://
federalregister.gov/a/2014-27368) to
receive information regarding which
firearms and firearms accessories, that
incorporate advanced safety
technologies, could be made available
by industry for testing and evaluation in
the Challenge.
NIJ now seeks an objective
demonstration of the reliability of
firearms available today with advanced
gun safety technology integrated into
the firearm. The reliability of firearms
with integrated advanced safety
technologies has been cited as a concern
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
regarding the potential performance and
user acceptance of products that may
incorporate such technologies, as
discussed in the 2013 NIJ report. It is
anticipated that the results of the
Challenge will provide a basis to
improve the general understanding of
whether the addition of a smart gun
technology does or does not
significantly reduce the reliability of the
firearm system compared to existing
firearms. It is believed that this is the
first effort to apply a methodology to
provide a rigorous and scientific
assessment of the technical performance
characteristics of these types of firearms.
With this Challenge, manufacturers
and developers of (1) firearms that
incorporate advanced safety
technologies or (2) firearms accessories
utilizing advanced safety technologies
that are intended to modify firearms
were able to submit their products for
testing and evaluation. The Challenge is
designed to proceed in an escalated
manner in three stages, including an
informational and safety review, light
duty single product testing, and more
heavy duty expanded product testing.
To assess the reliability of smart gun
technology, the U.S. Army Aberdeen
Test Center (ATC) plans to perform
firearm testing and evaluation. The
Challenge was published on October 7,
2015, and closed to submissions on
January 5, 2016.
NIJ hopes to better understand the
effect of smart gun technology on the
reliability of the firearm versus the same
or similar firearms without the added
safety technology. This Challenge seeks
‘‘apples to apples’’ comparisons to the
greatest extent possible. Testing and
evaluation is designed to prioritize the
collection and use of data that can
substantiate conclusions about the
relative performance of firearms, so that
firearms with and without advanced
gun safety technology that are similar
with respect to type, form factor, caliber,
and other physical characteristics are
tested and evaluated using a common
methodology and equivalent
ammunition. Testing and evaluation is
not designed to provide comparison of
test results against absolute performance
requirements or safety criteria, but
rather to provide a meaningful
comparison of test results of one firearm
against another similar firearm, or a
firearm with and without a relevant
safety accessory.
Nancy Rodriguez,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–10121 Filed 4–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25717-25718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10059]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121-0219]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed eCollection;
eComments Requested Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved
Collection Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC)
AGENCY: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office
of Justice Programs.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, will be
submitting the following information collection request to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional
30 days until May 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have comments especially on the
estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or
need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information, please contact Brecht Donoghue,
(202) 305-1270, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention,
Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810 Seventh
Street NW., Washington, DC 20531. Written comments and/or suggestions
can also be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice
Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent to
OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of
the following four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of this information collection:
(1) Type of information collection: Extension, without change, of a
currently approved collection.
(2) The title of the form/collection: Juvenile Residential Facility
Census.
(3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of
the Department sponsoring the collection: The form number is CJ-15,
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, United States
Department of Justice.
[[Page 25718]]
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Primary: Federal Government, State, Local or
Tribal. Other: Not-for-profit institutions; Business or other for-
profit.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is
estimated that 2,429 respondents will complete a 2-hour questionnaire.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: Approximately 4,858 hours.
If additional information is required, contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 3E.405B, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: April 26, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016-10059 Filed 4-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
