Presidential Task Force on Combating Illegal Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and Seafood Fraud Action Plan for Implementing Recommendations 14/15; Commerce Trusted Trader Program, 25646-25648 [2016-10005]
Download as PDF
25646
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2016 / Notices
Dated: April 21, 2016.
Julia Harrison,
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–10036 Filed 4–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE553
Presidential Task Force on Combating
Illegal Unreported and Unregulated
(IUU) Fishing and Seafood Fraud
Action Plan for Implementing
Recommendations 14/15; Commerce
Trusted Trader Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
The National Ocean Council
Committee on IUU Fishing and Seafood
Fraud (NOC Committee) is seeking
public input on the design and
implementation of a Commerce Trusted
Trader Program as part of an effective
seafood traceability process to combat
IUU fishing and seafood fraud. The
Commerce Trusted Trader Program will
establish within the previously
proposed Seafood Import Monitoring
Program such benefits as reduced
targeting and inspections, and enhanced
streamlined entry into U.S. commerce
for holders of an International Fisheries
Trade Permit that are certified for
participation in the Commerce Trusted
Trader Program.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 28, 2016. Public webinars will take
place from 2:00 to 3:30 p.m. eastern
daylight time on May 4, 2016, 2:00 to
3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time on May
10, 2016, and 2:30 to 4:00 p.m. eastern
daylight time on June 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by Docket
NOAA–NMFS–2014–0090, by either of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20140090, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Melissa Beaudry, Quality Officer, Office
of International Affairs and Seafood
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Apr 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
Inspection, 1315 East-West Highway,
Suite 9511, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the
comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential
business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Anonymous
comments will be accepted (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required field if you wish
to remain anonymous).
Information on joining the public
webinars will be posted online at
www.iuufishing.noaa.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Beaudry, Quality Officer, Office
of International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection; 301–427–8308.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 17, 2014, the White House
released a Presidential Memorandum
entitled ‘‘Establishing a Comprehensive
Framework to Combat Illegal,
Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing
and Seafood Fraud.’’ Among other
actions, the Memorandum established a
Presidential Task Force on Combating
Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated
(IUU) Fishing and Seafood Fraud (Task
Force), co-chaired by the Departments of
State and Commerce, with membership
including a number of other Federal
agency and White House Offices: The
Departments of Agriculture, Defense,
Health and Human Services, Homeland
Security, Interior, and Justice; the
Federal Trade Commission; the U.S.
Agency for International Development;
the Council on Environmental Quality;
the Office of Science and Technology
Policy; the National Security Council;
and the Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative.
The Task Force was directed to report
to the President ‘‘recommendations for
the implementation of a comprehensive
framework of integrated programs to
combat IUU fishing and seafood fraud
that emphasizes areas of greatest need.’’
Those recommendations were provided
to the President through the National
Ocean Council, and NMFS requested
comments from the public on how to
effectively implement the
recommendations of the Task Force (79
FR 75536, December 18, 2014).
Oversight for implementing the
recommendations of the Task Force has
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
been charged to the National Ocean
Council Standing Committee on IUU
Fishing and Seafood Fraud (NOC
Committee). On March 15, 2015, the
Task Force published its Action Plan for
Implementing the Task Force
Recommendations (https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ia/iuu/
taskforce.html).
Recommendation 14 concerns the
development of a risk-based traceability
program as a means to combat IUU
fishing and seafood fraud.
Recommendation 15 calls for the
implementation of the first phase of that
risk-based traceability program that
tracks fish and fish products identified
as being at risk of IUU fishing or seafood
fraud from point of harvest to point of
entry into U.S. commerce.
The first step taken to address
Recommendations 14 and 15 was the
identification of those species likely to
be at risk of IUU fishing or seafood
fraud. The second step taken was
proposed rulemaking (81 FR 6210,
February 5, 2016), which would
establish data reporting, recordkeeping,
and related operational requirements at
the point of entry into U.S. commerce
for imported fish and fish products of
at-risk species. The data reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for at-risk
species imports would apply to
importers of record, who would be
required to obtain an International
Fisheries Trade Permit. The importers of
record are the importers as identified in
CBP entry filings for shipments
containing the designated at-risk
species. Customs brokers may fulfill
these requirements on behalf of the
importer of record at the importer of
record’s request.
The next step is to develop and
implement a trusted trader program
whereby the Secretary of Commerce will
collaborate with the Secretary of
Homeland Security and other agencies
as relevant to assist in developing a
voluntary Commerce Trusted Trader
Program for importers of the species
covered by the final rule to be issued to
establish a Seafood Import Monitoring
Program. The Commerce Trusted Trader
Program will provide benefits such as
reduced targeting and inspections and
enhanced streamlined entry into U.S.
commerce for certified importers. With
this notice, the Committee is soliciting
comments on the design and
implementation of this Commerce
Trusted Trader Program.
Scope
As proposed, the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program holds the importer
of record responsible for certain
reporting and recordkeeping
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2016 / Notices
requirements. The Committee has
therefore identified the universe of
International Fishery Trade Permit
(IFTP) holders as falling within the
scope of a Commerce Trusted Trader
Program. The Committee seeks
comments on whether this is the
appropriate scope and how the scope of
the program might be expanded to
include entities with a role in securing
the supply chain that are not directly
responsible for record keeping and
reporting and who may not be required
to hold an IFTP. For example, might a
Trusted Trader Program include
customs brokers acting on behalf of
importers of record, freight forwarders,
foreign harvesters, foreign processors or
a foreign exporting company? The
Committee seeks comments on what
other roles in the supply chain and
import process might benefit from
reduced inspections and a streamlined
entry process.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Criteria
The Committee seeks comment on
scope of criteria for evaluating and
certifying permit holders as ‘‘trusted
traders’’. Such criteria might include,
among other considerations, the
compliance record of the applicant for
other federal programs, the extent to
which the certified permit holder has
measures in place to verify the source
and chain of custody of imported fish
and fish products, and the nature and
complexity of the supply chains from
which the permit holder sources their
imports. Additionally, the Committee
seeks comment as to how the criteria
within the scope of a Trusted Trader
program should be weighted when
considering certification of a permit
holder.
The Committee also seeks comment
on which attributes of a supply chain
covered by the scope of the Seafood
Import Monitoring Program (harvest,
landing, shipment, processing, storage,
import entry, etc.), if any, can be
considered as criteria for inclusion in a
Trusted Trader program. As with the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program
itself, implementation of a Commerce
Trusted Trader Program must be
compliant with United States
international trade obligations.
Benefits and Incentives
The Task Force Action Plan describes
the Commerce Trusted Trader Program
as ‘‘provid[ing] benefits such as reduced
targeting and inspections and enhanced
streamlined entry into U.S. commerce
. . .’’ The Committee seeks comments
on these and other potential benefits
that may expedite the flow of trade,
reduce the burden of compliance for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Apr 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
certified permit holders, and improve
implementation and enforcement
efficiency. Additionally, the Committee
seeks comment on how those benefits
will incentivize participation in the
Commerce Trusted Trader Program
while ensuring the continued
effectiveness of the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program.
Evaluation and Verification of Certified
Permit Holders
The Committee seeks
recommendations on the potential scope
and process of evaluating permit
holders for certification. Commenters
are encouraged to describe how permit
holders should be evaluated against
recommended criteria.
The Committee also seeks
recommendations on the potential scope
and process of verifying a certified
permit holder’s ongoing compliance
with certification criteria. Commenters
are encouraged to describe process and
frequency by which certified Trusted
Traders and other entities that may be
included in the Commerce Trusted
Trader Program are evaluated for
compliance with certification criteria.
Relationship to Other Trusted Trader
or Federal Import Programs
NOAA administers several other trade
monitoring programs requiring
importers of record to obtain an IFTP,
report information at time of entry, and
maintain records describing the
imported product’s chain of custody.
These include the Highly Migratory
Species Catch Documentation Program
and the Antarctic Marine Living
Resources Import/Export Certification
Program. The Committee seeks
comment on the extent to which these
programs can or should be included in
a Commerce Trusted Trader Program.
Comments are also requested
regarding the potential coordination of
other federal trusted trader or import
monitoring programs as a means of
expediting the entry of fish products,
reducing overall regulatory burden, and
improving the efficiency of
implementation and enforcement.
Additionally, the Committee seeks
comment on how coordination, or
integration, with other federal Trusted
Trader programs will incentivize
participation in the Commerce Trusted
Trader Program while ensuring the
continued effectiveness of the Seafood
Import Monitoring Program.
NMFS notes, however, that the Tuna
Tracking and Verification Program
(TTVP) requires certain reporting and
recordkeeping requirements regarding
imports of tuna products on the part of
U.S. processors, importers, and others
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25647
for purposes of the dolphin safe labeling
requirements for tuna product. See 50
CFR part 216, subpart H. These
requirements were recently amended by
interim final rule. See 81 FR 15444,
March 23, 2016. The dolphin safe
labeling, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements fall outside the scope of
the Commerce Trusted Trader program
and those dolphin safe labeling
requirements would continue to apply
for tuna product regardless of whether
the importer qualifies as a trusted trader
under this program.
Third Party Traceability Systems
The Committee is aware of private
efforts by seafood producers, traders,
wholesalers, retailers, and third parties
to trace and track seafood products and
seeks comment regarding the
consideration of those traceability
efforts in the design and
implementation of a Commerce Trusted
Trader Program. The committee also
seeks recommendations for operational
standards for such systems should they
be included in a Commerce Trusted
Trader Program.
Timing and Implementation
While the IUU Task Force Action Plan
calls for the Commerce Trusted Trader
Program to be finalized by September
2016, the timing of actual
implementation may be affected by,
among other factors, timing of the
implementation of the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program final rule,
completion of the structure and
elements of the Commerce Trusted
Trader Program, and the timeframe for
completion of Commerce Trusted
Trader Program business rules in the
International Trade Data System, as
necessary for implementation. NMFS
will in any case make its best effort to
implement the Seafood Import
Monitoring Program and the associated
Commerce Trusted Trader Program
simultaneously. The Committee seeks
comment on the potential impacts and
benefits of implementing the Commerce
Trusted Trader Program some weeks or
months following the implementation of
the Seafood Import Monitoring Program.
The committee also seeks
recommendations for design and
implementation of the Commerce
Trusted Trader Program regarding
measures that can be taken to minimize
the cost and burden of those impacts
and capture available benefits.
The Committee will address
outstanding design and implementation
issues associated with the Commerce
Trusted Trader Program in its December
2016 report on the implementation of
the Seafood Traceability Program.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
25648
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2016 / Notices
Following the public comment
period, the NOC Committee will take
the input received into consideration
while finalizing recommendations that
will be sent forward for appropriate
agency action, as outlined in the
implementation plan for Task Force
Recommendations 14 and 15.
Dated: April 25, 2016.
John Henderschedt,
Director, Office for International Affairs and
Seafood Inspection, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–10005 Filed 4–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE593
New England Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
AGENCY:
The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council), Atlantic
Herring Committee, Atlantic Herring
Advisory Panel and Atlantic Herring
Plan Development Team is scheduling a
public workshop on the Atlantic
Herring Acceptable Biological Catch
Control Rule Management Strategy
Evaluation to consider actions affecting
New England fisheries in the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ).
Recommendations from this group will
be brought to the full Council for formal
consideration and action, if appropriate.
DATES: This workshop will be held on
Monday, May 16, 2016 at 10 a.m. and
Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 9 a.m.
ADDRESSES: The workshop will be held
at the Holiday Inn by the Bay, 88 Spring
Street, Portland, ME 04101; phone: (207)
775–2311; fax: (207) 772–4017.
Council address: New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director,
New England Fishery Management
Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Agenda
The Council is currently developing
Amendment 8 to the Atlantic Herring
Fishery Management Plan. Through
Amendment 8, the Council expects to
establish a long-term control rule for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Apr 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
specifying acceptable biological catch
(ABC) for the Atlantic herring fishery. A
control rule is a formulaic approach for
establishing an annual limit or target
fishing level that is based on the best
available scientific information.
An objective of Amendment 8 is to
develop and implement an ABC control
rule that manages Atlantic herring
within an ecosystem context and
addresses the goals of Amendment 8,
which are to: Account for the role of
Atlantic herring within the ecosystem,
including its role as forage; to stabilize
the fishery at a level designed to achieve
optimum yield; to address localized
depletion in inshore waters.
In January 2016, the Council
approved conducting a Management
Strategy Evaluation (MSE) to support
the development of alternatives
regarding the ABC control rule. MSE is
a collaborative decision-making process,
involving upfront public input and
technical analysis than the normal
amendment development process. MSE
can take many forms, but here, the MSE
will be used to help determine how a
range of control rules may perform
relative to potential objectives. An early
step of the MSE is this public workshop
to develop recommendations for
Council consideration for a range of
potential objectives of the Atlantic
herring ABC control rule, how these
objectives may be tested (i.e., associated
performance metrics), and the range of
control rules that would undergo
testing.
Workshop Goals
The Council is hosting this MSE
workshop to develop a common
understanding of Management Strategy
Evaluation; develop recommendations
to the Council for: A range of potential
objectives of the Atlantic herring ABC
control rule, quantitative metrics to
evaluate the performance of control
rules relative to the objectives, and a
range of control rules to be evaluated
and/or the general characteristics of a
control rule; develop a common
understanding of the potentials and
limitations of models that may affect
simulation testing, and given those,
identify which uncertainties are most
important to resolve; provide an
opportunity for stakeholders of the
Atlantic herring fishery to provide
greater input than typically possible at
Council meetings, in an environment
that supports constructive and open
dialogue between users of the resource,
scientific experts, fishery managers, and
other interested members of the public.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during these meetings. Action
will be restricted to those issues
specifically listed in this notice and any
issues arising after publication of this
notice that require emergency action
under section 305(c) of the MagnusonStevens Act, provided the public has
been notified of the Council’s intent to
take final action to address the
emergency.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Thomas A. Nies,
Executive Director, at (978) 465–0492, at
least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 26, 2016.
Jeffrey N. Lonergan,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–10074 Filed 4–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE597
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council; Public Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meetings and
hearings.
AGENCY:
The Western Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) will
hold a meeting of its Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI)
Mariana Archipelago Advisory Panel
(AP) and its Guam Mariana Archipelago
AP to discuss and make
recommendations on issues in Guam,
CNMI and the Western Pacific region.
DATES: The CNMI AP meeting will be
held on Wednesday, May 18, 2016,
between 6:30 p.m. and 9 p.m. The Guam
AP meeting will be held on Friday, May
20, 2016, between 6 p.m. and 9 p.m. All
times listed are local times. For agendas,
see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The CNMI AP meeting will
be held at the CNMI Division of Fish &
Wildlife Conference Room, Lower Base,
Saipan, MP, 96950 and the Guam AP
meeting will be held at the Hilton Guam
Resort & Spa, 202 Hilton Road, Tumon
Bay, GU 96913.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25646-25648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10005]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE553
Presidential Task Force on Combating Illegal Unreported and
Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and Seafood Fraud Action Plan for
Implementing Recommendations 14/15; Commerce Trusted Trader Program
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Ocean Council Committee on IUU Fishing and
Seafood Fraud (NOC Committee) is seeking public input on the design and
implementation of a Commerce Trusted Trader Program as part of an
effective seafood traceability process to combat IUU fishing and
seafood fraud. The Commerce Trusted Trader Program will establish
within the previously proposed Seafood Import Monitoring Program such
benefits as reduced targeting and inspections, and enhanced streamlined
entry into U.S. commerce for holders of an International Fisheries
Trade Permit that are certified for participation in the Commerce
Trusted Trader Program.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 28, 2016. Public webinars will
take place from 2:00 to 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time on May 4, 2016,
2:00 to 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time on May 10, 2016, and 2:30 to
4:00 p.m. eastern daylight time on June 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
Docket NOAA-NMFS-2014-0090, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2014-0090, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Melissa Beaudry, Quality
Officer, Office of International Affairs and Seafood Inspection, 1315
East-West Highway, Suite 9511, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are part of the public record and
will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Anonymous comments will be accepted (enter ``N/A''
in the required field if you wish to remain anonymous).
Information on joining the public webinars will be posted online at
www.iuufishing.noaa.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Beaudry, Quality Officer,
Office of International Affairs and Seafood Inspection; 301-427-8308.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 17, 2014, the White House released a Presidential
Memorandum entitled ``Establishing a Comprehensive Framework to Combat
Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing and Seafood Fraud.'' Among
other actions, the Memorandum established a Presidential Task Force on
Combating Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing and
Seafood Fraud (Task Force), co-chaired by the Departments of State and
Commerce, with membership including a number of other Federal agency
and White House Offices: The Departments of Agriculture, Defense,
Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Interior, and Justice;
the Federal Trade Commission; the U.S. Agency for International
Development; the Council on Environmental Quality; the Office of
Science and Technology Policy; the National Security Council; and the
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
The Task Force was directed to report to the President
``recommendations for the implementation of a comprehensive framework
of integrated programs to combat IUU fishing and seafood fraud that
emphasizes areas of greatest need.'' Those recommendations were
provided to the President through the National Ocean Council, and NMFS
requested comments from the public on how to effectively implement the
recommendations of the Task Force (79 FR 75536, December 18, 2014).
Oversight for implementing the recommendations of the Task Force has
been charged to the National Ocean Council Standing Committee on IUU
Fishing and Seafood Fraud (NOC Committee). On March 15, 2015, the Task
Force published its Action Plan for Implementing the Task Force
Recommendations (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ia/iuu/taskforce.html).
Recommendation 14 concerns the development of a risk-based
traceability program as a means to combat IUU fishing and seafood
fraud. Recommendation 15 calls for the implementation of the first
phase of that risk-based traceability program that tracks fish and fish
products identified as being at risk of IUU fishing or seafood fraud
from point of harvest to point of entry into U.S. commerce.
The first step taken to address Recommendations 14 and 15 was the
identification of those species likely to be at risk of IUU fishing or
seafood fraud. The second step taken was proposed rulemaking (81 FR
6210, February 5, 2016), which would establish data reporting,
recordkeeping, and related operational requirements at the point of
entry into U.S. commerce for imported fish and fish products of at-risk
species. The data reporting and recordkeeping requirements for at-risk
species imports would apply to importers of record, who would be
required to obtain an International Fisheries Trade Permit. The
importers of record are the importers as identified in CBP entry
filings for shipments containing the designated at-risk species.
Customs brokers may fulfill these requirements on behalf of the
importer of record at the importer of record's request.
The next step is to develop and implement a trusted trader program
whereby the Secretary of Commerce will collaborate with the Secretary
of Homeland Security and other agencies as relevant to assist in
developing a voluntary Commerce Trusted Trader Program for importers of
the species covered by the final rule to be issued to establish a
Seafood Import Monitoring Program. The Commerce Trusted Trader Program
will provide benefits such as reduced targeting and inspections and
enhanced streamlined entry into U.S. commerce for certified importers.
With this notice, the Committee is soliciting comments on the design
and implementation of this Commerce Trusted Trader Program.
Scope
As proposed, the Seafood Import Monitoring Program holds the
importer of record responsible for certain reporting and recordkeeping
[[Page 25647]]
requirements. The Committee has therefore identified the universe of
International Fishery Trade Permit (IFTP) holders as falling within the
scope of a Commerce Trusted Trader Program. The Committee seeks
comments on whether this is the appropriate scope and how the scope of
the program might be expanded to include entities with a role in
securing the supply chain that are not directly responsible for record
keeping and reporting and who may not be required to hold an IFTP. For
example, might a Trusted Trader Program include customs brokers acting
on behalf of importers of record, freight forwarders, foreign
harvesters, foreign processors or a foreign exporting company? The
Committee seeks comments on what other roles in the supply chain and
import process might benefit from reduced inspections and a streamlined
entry process.
Criteria
The Committee seeks comment on scope of criteria for evaluating and
certifying permit holders as ``trusted traders''. Such criteria might
include, among other considerations, the compliance record of the
applicant for other federal programs, the extent to which the certified
permit holder has measures in place to verify the source and chain of
custody of imported fish and fish products, and the nature and
complexity of the supply chains from which the permit holder sources
their imports. Additionally, the Committee seeks comment as to how the
criteria within the scope of a Trusted Trader program should be
weighted when considering certification of a permit holder.
The Committee also seeks comment on which attributes of a supply
chain covered by the scope of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program
(harvest, landing, shipment, processing, storage, import entry, etc.),
if any, can be considered as criteria for inclusion in a Trusted Trader
program. As with the Seafood Import Monitoring Program itself,
implementation of a Commerce Trusted Trader Program must be compliant
with United States international trade obligations.
Benefits and Incentives
The Task Force Action Plan describes the Commerce Trusted Trader
Program as ``provid[ing] benefits such as reduced targeting and
inspections and enhanced streamlined entry into U.S. commerce . . .''
The Committee seeks comments on these and other potential benefits that
may expedite the flow of trade, reduce the burden of compliance for
certified permit holders, and improve implementation and enforcement
efficiency. Additionally, the Committee seeks comment on how those
benefits will incentivize participation in the Commerce Trusted Trader
Program while ensuring the continued effectiveness of the Seafood
Import Monitoring Program.
Evaluation and Verification of Certified Permit Holders
The Committee seeks recommendations on the potential scope and
process of evaluating permit holders for certification. Commenters are
encouraged to describe how permit holders should be evaluated against
recommended criteria.
The Committee also seeks recommendations on the potential scope and
process of verifying a certified permit holder's ongoing compliance
with certification criteria. Commenters are encouraged to describe
process and frequency by which certified Trusted Traders and other
entities that may be included in the Commerce Trusted Trader Program
are evaluated for compliance with certification criteria.
Relationship to Other Trusted Trader or Federal Import Programs
NOAA administers several other trade monitoring programs requiring
importers of record to obtain an IFTP, report information at time of
entry, and maintain records describing the imported product's chain of
custody. These include the Highly Migratory Species Catch Documentation
Program and the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Import/Export
Certification Program. The Committee seeks comment on the extent to
which these programs can or should be included in a Commerce Trusted
Trader Program.
Comments are also requested regarding the potential coordination of
other federal trusted trader or import monitoring programs as a means
of expediting the entry of fish products, reducing overall regulatory
burden, and improving the efficiency of implementation and enforcement.
Additionally, the Committee seeks comment on how coordination, or
integration, with other federal Trusted Trader programs will
incentivize participation in the Commerce Trusted Trader Program while
ensuring the continued effectiveness of the Seafood Import Monitoring
Program.
NMFS notes, however, that the Tuna Tracking and Verification
Program (TTVP) requires certain reporting and recordkeeping
requirements regarding imports of tuna products on the part of U.S.
processors, importers, and others for purposes of the dolphin safe
labeling requirements for tuna product. See 50 CFR part 216, subpart H.
These requirements were recently amended by interim final rule. See 81
FR 15444, March 23, 2016. The dolphin safe labeling, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements fall outside the scope of the Commerce
Trusted Trader program and those dolphin safe labeling requirements
would continue to apply for tuna product regardless of whether the
importer qualifies as a trusted trader under this program.
Third Party Traceability Systems
The Committee is aware of private efforts by seafood producers,
traders, wholesalers, retailers, and third parties to trace and track
seafood products and seeks comment regarding the consideration of those
traceability efforts in the design and implementation of a Commerce
Trusted Trader Program. The committee also seeks recommendations for
operational standards for such systems should they be included in a
Commerce Trusted Trader Program.
Timing and Implementation
While the IUU Task Force Action Plan calls for the Commerce Trusted
Trader Program to be finalized by September 2016, the timing of actual
implementation may be affected by, among other factors, timing of the
implementation of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program final rule,
completion of the structure and elements of the Commerce Trusted Trader
Program, and the timeframe for completion of Commerce Trusted Trader
Program business rules in the International Trade Data System, as
necessary for implementation. NMFS will in any case make its best
effort to implement the Seafood Import Monitoring Program and the
associated Commerce Trusted Trader Program simultaneously. The
Committee seeks comment on the potential impacts and benefits of
implementing the Commerce Trusted Trader Program some weeks or months
following the implementation of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program.
The committee also seeks recommendations for design and implementation
of the Commerce Trusted Trader Program regarding measures that can be
taken to minimize the cost and burden of those impacts and capture
available benefits.
The Committee will address outstanding design and implementation
issues associated with the Commerce Trusted Trader Program in its
December 2016 report on the implementation of the Seafood Traceability
Program.
[[Page 25648]]
Following the public comment period, the NOC Committee will take
the input received into consideration while finalizing recommendations
that will be sent forward for appropriate agency action, as outlined in
the implementation plan for Task Force Recommendations 14 and 15.
Dated: April 25, 2016.
John Henderschedt,
Director, Office for International Affairs and Seafood Inspection,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-10005 Filed 4-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P