Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 24904-24905 [2016-09804]
Download as PDF
24904
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices
accessed via the Commission’s Web site
(https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints
Christopher C. Mohr to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Commission Action
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2016–123 and CP2016–156 to
consider the matters raised in each
docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505,
Christopher C. Mohr is appointed to
serve as an officer of the Commission to
represent the interests of the general
public in these proceedings (Public
Representative).
3. Comments are due no later than
April 28, 2016.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30-.35, the Postal
Service filed a formal request and
associated supporting information to
add Priority Mail Contract 208 to the
competitive product list.1
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a redacted
contract related to the proposed new
product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and
39 CFR 3015.5. Request, Attachment B.
To support its Request, the Postal
Service filed a copy of the contract, a
copy of the Governors’ Decision
authorizing the product, proposed
changes to the Mail Classification
Schedule, a Statement of Supporting
Justification, a certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), and
an application for non-public treatment
of certain materials. It also filed
supporting financial workpapers.
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–09735 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
II. Notice of Commission Action
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2016–123 and CP2016–156 to
consider the Request pertaining to the
proposed Priority Mail Contract 208
product and the related contract,
respectively.
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s filings in
the captioned dockets are consistent
with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are
due no later than April 28, 2016. The
public portions of these filings can be
Summary: In accordance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
which provides opportunity for public
comment on new or revised data
collections, the Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed data collections.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of the information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden related to
the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
1. Title and purpose of information
collection: Evidence of Marital
Relationship, Living with Requirements;
OMB 3220–0021.
To support an application for a
spouse or widow(er)’s annuity under
Sections 2(c) or 2(d) of the Railroad
Retirement Act, an applicant must
submit proof of a valid marriage to a
railroad employee. In some cases, the
existence of a marital relationship is not
formalized by a civil or religious
ceremony. In other cases, questions may
arise about the legal termination of a
prior marriage of the employee, spouse,
or widow(er). In these instances, the
RRB must secure additional information
to resolve questionable marital
relationships. The circumstances
requiring an applicant to submit
documentary evidence of marriage are
prescribed in 20 CFR 219.30.
In the absence of documentary
evidence, the RRB needs to determine if
a valid marriage existed between a
spouse or widow(er) annuity applicant
and a railroad employee. The RRB
utilizes Forms G–124, Individual
Statement of Marital Relationship; G–
124a, Certification of Marriage
Information; G–237, Statement
Regarding Marital Status; G–238,
Statement of Residence; and G–238a,
Statement Regarding Divorce or
Annulment, to secure the needed
information. One response is requested
of each respondent. Completion is
required to obtain benefits. The RRB
proposes minor non-burden impacting
changes to the forms in the collection.
ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN
Annual
responses
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Form number
G–124 (in person) ........................................................................................................................
G–124 (by mail) ...........................................................................................................................
G–124a ........................................................................................................................................
G–237 (in person) ........................................................................................................................
G–237 (by mail) ...........................................................................................................................
G–238 (in person) ........................................................................................................................
G–238 (by mail) ...........................................................................................................................
G–238a ........................................................................................................................................
125
75
300
75
75
150
150
150
Total ......................................................................................................................................
Time
(minutes)
Burden
(hours)
15
20
10
15
20
3
5
10
1,100
31
25
50
19
25
8
13
25
196
* Forms G–124, G–237, G–238, and G–238a can be completed either with assistance from RRB personnel during an in-office interview or by
mail.
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Priority Mail Contract 208 to Competitive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Apr 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, April 20, 2016 (Request).
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices
2. Title and purpose of information
collection: Voluntary Customer Surveys
in Accordance with E.O. 12862; OMB
3220–0192.
In accordance with Executive Order
12862, the Railroad Retirement Board
(RRB) conducts a number of customer
surveys designed to determine the kinds
and quality of services our beneficiaries,
claimants, employers and members of
the public want and expect, as well as
their satisfaction with existing RRB
services. The information collected is
used by RRB management to monitor
customer satisfaction by determining to
what extent services are satisfactory and
where and to what extent services can
be improved. The surveys are limited to
data collections that solicit strictly
voluntary opinions, and do not collect
information which is required or
regulated. The information collection,
which was first approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) in
1997, provides the RRB with a generic
clearance authority. This generic
authority allows the RRB to submit a
variety of new or revised customer
survey instruments (needed to timely
implement customer monitoring
activities) to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for expedited review
and approval.
The average burden per response for
customer satisfaction activities is
estimated to range from 2 minutes for a
Web site questionnaire to 2 hours for
participation in a focus group. The RRB
estimates an annual burden of 1,620
annual respondents totaling 731 hours
for the generic customer survey
clearance.
Additional Information or Comments:
To request more information or to
obtain a copy of the information
collection justification, forms, and/or
supporting material, contact Dana
Hickman at (312) 751–4981 or
Dana.Hickman@RRB.GOV. Comments
regarding the information collection
should be addressed to Charles
Mierzwa, Railroad Retirement Board,
844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois
60611–2092 or emailed to
Charles.Mierzwa@RRB.GOV. Written
comments should be received within 60
days of this notice.
Charles Mierzwa,
Chief of Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 2016–09804 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Apr 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77680; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Establish
Procedures for the Allocation of Cages
to Co-Located Users, Including the
Waiver of Certain Fees, and To Amend
the Visitor Security Escort Fee
April 21, 2016.
I. Introduction
On February 23, 2016 NYSE MKT
LLC (‘‘the Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
establish procedures for the allocation
of cages to co-located Users, including
the waiver of certain fees, and to amend
the visitor security escort fee. On March
1, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
March 11, 2016.3 There were no
comments on the proposed rule change.
This order approves the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1.
II. Background and Description of the
Proposal, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1
The Exchange proposes to establish
procedures for the allocation of cages to
its co-located Users,4 including the
waiver of certain fees subject to
specified conditions, and to amend the
visitor security escort fee.5 The
Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE
MKT Equities Price List (‘‘Price List’’)
and the NYSE Amex Options Fee
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
77304 (March 7, 2016), 81 FR 12981 (‘‘Notice’’).
Amendment No.1 was included in the Notice and
provided certain clarifications, including that that
the proposed waiver of fees for two bundles of 24
cross connects, applicable while a User is on the
waitlist, would only apply to cross-connects used
to connect an individual User’s non-contiguous
cabinets.
4 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant
that requests to receive co-location services directly
from the Exchange. The Exchange provides colocation services to Users from its data center
(‘‘Data Center’’) in Mahwah, New Jersey.
5 See Notice, 81 FR at 12981.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24905
Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to reflect the
changes.6
As more fully set forth in the Notice,
the Exchange offers Users the ability to
rent cages to house their cabinets in the
Data Center,7 and historically has
offered these cages on a first come/first
serve basis.8 The Exchange states that a
cage typically is purchased by a User
that has several cabinets within the Data
Center and wishes to arrange its
cabinets contiguously while also
enhancing privacy around its cabinets.9
The Exchange offers three cage sizes,
corresponding to the number of cabinets
housed therein, and charges fees for the
cages based on the size.10 The physical
footprint of each cage is greater than
that of the cabinets that it houses, as
each cage is constructed so as to include
aisles around the purchasing User’s
cabinets, for accessibility and to comply
with safety regulations.11 In order to
offer the cages, the Exchange must have
sufficient contiguous open space
available for the cage.12
In 2015, the Exchange determined
that to continue to be able to meet its
obligation to accommodate demand, and
in particular to make available more
contiguous, larger spaces for new and
existing Users, it would exercise its
right to move some Users’ equipment
within the Data Center (the
‘‘Migration’’).13 The Exchange
established procedures to manage the
Migration process, and continues to
implement them.14 The Exchange states
that, notwithstanding the Migration,
contiguous open space will still be
limited, and may become more limited
over time.15
Proposed Cage Allocation Procedure
The Exchange has proposed to
establish procedures governing the
allocation of cages should the currently
available open contiguous space in the
Data Center be insufficient to house a
new cage or if the open contiguous
6 See
id.
Notice, 81 FR at 12982. A User must have
at least two cabinets in the Data Center to purchase
a cage. See id.
8 See Notice, 81 FR at 12982.
9 See id.
10 See id.
11 See id.
12 See id.
13 See Notice, 81 FR at 12982; see also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 76269 (October 26, 2015),
80 FR 66947 (October 30, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–
42); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76268
(October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944 (October 30, 2015)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2015–70); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 76270 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944
(October 30, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–85)
(collectively ‘‘Migration Filing’’).
14 See Notice, 81 FR at 12982; see also Migration
Filing supra note 13.
15 See Notice, 81 FR at 12982.
7 See
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24904-24905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09804]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Summary:
In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for public
comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB) will publish periodic summaries of proposed data
collections.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed information
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information has practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection
of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden related to the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
1. Title and purpose of information collection: Evidence of Marital
Relationship, Living with Requirements; OMB 3220-0021.
To support an application for a spouse or widow(er)'s annuity under
Sections 2(c) or 2(d) of the Railroad Retirement Act, an applicant must
submit proof of a valid marriage to a railroad employee. In some cases,
the existence of a marital relationship is not formalized by a civil or
religious ceremony. In other cases, questions may arise about the legal
termination of a prior marriage of the employee, spouse, or widow(er).
In these instances, the RRB must secure additional information to
resolve questionable marital relationships. The circumstances requiring
an applicant to submit documentary evidence of marriage are prescribed
in 20 CFR 219.30.
In the absence of documentary evidence, the RRB needs to determine
if a valid marriage existed between a spouse or widow(er) annuity
applicant and a railroad employee. The RRB utilizes Forms G-124,
Individual Statement of Marital Relationship; G-124a, Certification of
Marriage Information; G-237, Statement Regarding Marital Status; G-238,
Statement of Residence; and G-238a, Statement Regarding Divorce or
Annulment, to secure the needed information. One response is requested
of each respondent. Completion is required to obtain benefits. The RRB
proposes minor non-burden impacting changes to the forms in the
collection.
Estimate of Annual Respondent Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Form number responses Time (minutes) Burden (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G-124 (in person)............................................... 125 15 31
G-124 (by mail)................................................. 75 20 25
G-124a.......................................................... 300 10 50
G-237 (in person)............................................... 75 15 19
G-237 (by mail)................................................. 75 20 25
G-238 (in person)............................................... 150 3 8
G-238 (by mail)................................................. 150 5 13
G-238a.......................................................... 150 10 25
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 1,100 196
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Forms G-124, G-237, G-238, and G-238a can be completed either with assistance from RRB personnel during an in-
office interview or by mail.
[[Page 24905]]
2. Title and purpose of information collection: Voluntary Customer
Surveys in Accordance with E.O. 12862; OMB 3220-0192.
In accordance with Executive Order 12862, the Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB) conducts a number of customer surveys designed to determine
the kinds and quality of services our beneficiaries, claimants,
employers and members of the public want and expect, as well as their
satisfaction with existing RRB services. The information collected is
used by RRB management to monitor customer satisfaction by determining
to what extent services are satisfactory and where and to what extent
services can be improved. The surveys are limited to data collections
that solicit strictly voluntary opinions, and do not collect
information which is required or regulated. The information collection,
which was first approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
in 1997, provides the RRB with a generic clearance authority. This
generic authority allows the RRB to submit a variety of new or revised
customer survey instruments (needed to timely implement customer
monitoring activities) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
expedited review and approval.
The average burden per response for customer satisfaction
activities is estimated to range from 2 minutes for a Web site
questionnaire to 2 hours for participation in a focus group. The RRB
estimates an annual burden of 1,620 annual respondents totaling 731
hours for the generic customer survey clearance.
Additional Information or Comments: To request more information or
to obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms,
and/or supporting material, contact Dana Hickman at (312) 751-4981 or
Dana.Hickman@RRB.GOV. Comments regarding the information collection
should be addressed to Charles Mierzwa, Railroad Retirement Board, 844
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 or emailed to
Charles.Mierzwa@RRB.GOV. Written comments should be received within 60
days of this notice.
Charles Mierzwa,
Chief of Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 2016-09804 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P