Federal Regulation Supplement: Revisions to Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (NASA Case 2015-N030), 24735-24737 [2016-09625]
Download as PDF
24735
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 81
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
2 CFR Part 1800
RIN 2700–AE29
Federal Regulation Supplement:
Revisions to Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles and
Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards (NASA Case 2015–N030)
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
NASA is proposing to amend
the NASA regulation, titled Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards to modify the
requirements related to information
contained in a Federal award for
commercial firms with no cost sharing
requirement and to add new or modify
existing terms and conditions related to
indirect cost charges and access to
research results.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before June
27, 2016, to be considered in the
formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by NASA Case 2015–N030,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘NASA Case 2015–N030’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘NASA Case 2015–
N030.’’ Follow the instructions
provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and ‘‘NASA
Case 2015–N030’’ on your attached
document.
Æ Email: jennifer.l.richards@nasa.gov.
Include NASA Case 2015–N030 in the
subject line of the message.
Æ Fax: (202) 358–3082.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Apr 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
Æ Mail: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Headquarters,
Office of Procurement, Contract and
Grant Policy Division, Attn: Ms. Jennifer
Richards, Room 5M34, 300 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20546–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jennifer Richards, NASA HQ, Office of
Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy
Division, Room 5M34, 300 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20456–0001.
Telephone 202–358–0047; facsimile
202–358–3082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NASA is proposing the following
changes to NASA regulation Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (2 CFR part 1800):
1. Modify the requirement related to
information contained in a Federal
award for commercial firms with no cost
sharing requirement. NASA
requirements for information contained
in a Federal award can be found at 2
CFR 1800.210, which adopts and
supplements 2 CFR 200.210. Title 2 CFR
200.210 includes a list of data elements
that must be included in a Federal
award, including indirect cost rate for
the Federal award (including if the de
minimis rate is charged per § 200.414
Indirect (F&A) costs). Although 2 CFR
part 200 does not apply to commercial
firms, NASA, in its adoption of the
regulation at 2 CFR 1800.3,
Applicability, added commercial firms
with no cost sharing requirement to the
list of applicable entities. Therefore, the
requirement to include an indirect cost
rate on a notice of Federal award is
applicable to commercial firms with no
cost sharing requirement.
2. Add a new term and condition to
address those instances when a
recipient has a change in its negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement during the
period of performance of an award. See
2 CFR 200.56, 200.57, and 200.414 for
more information on indirect (facilities
& administrative) costs. NASA has
discovered that, on occasion, when a
recipient’s indirect cost rate has
changed as a result of a new negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement, the change
in rate has not always been captured
when indirect costs have been charged
to NASA. As a result, some recipients
have either overcharged or
undercharged NASA for indirect costs.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Modify an existing term and
condition and add a new term and
condition to ensure recipients meet
requirements associated with, ‘‘NASA
Plan: Increasing Access to the Results of
Scientific Research’’ (see https://
science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/
2015/07/08/NASA_Plan_for_increasing_
access_to_results_of_federally_funded_
research1.pdf). This plan was issued in
response to the Executive Office of the
President’s, Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP)
Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies,
dated February 22, 2013, ‘‘Increasing
Access to the Results of Federally
Funded Scientific Research.’’ Through
this memorandum, OSTP directed all
agencies with more than $100 million in
annual research and development
expenditures to prepare a plan for
improving the public’s access to the
results of federally funded research. Part
A of NASA’s plan focuses on digital
unclassified scientific research data,
which are research data that can be
stored digitally and accessed
electronically.
To facilitate increased access to such
data, NASA has updated its research
data policy to require all investigators
submitting a research proposal or
research project plan to NASA to
include a Data Management Plan for
managing and providing access to final
research data or to state why their data
cannot or need not be made publicly
available. Part B of the plan focuses on
the public access to peer-reviewed
scientific research manuscripts. The
scope of applicability of this part
includes all final peer-reviewed
scientific research manuscripts authored
or coauthored by investigators funded
for this research by NASA-appropriated
funds.
II. Analysis
After consideration of feedback from
commercial firms expressing concern
that indirect cost rates are sensitive
financial information which should not
be available on documents that could
potentially be released to the public,
NASA has determined that excluding
indirect cost rates from notices of
Federal award to commercial firms with
no cost sharing requirement is a prudent
business decision that protects sensitive
financial information.
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
24736
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules
In order to ensure that the permitted
amount of indirect costs is being
charged to an award, NASA is
proposing a new term and condition
requiring recipients that have changes to
their indirect cost rate agreement during
the period of performance of an award
to apply the approved rate to covered
direct costs expended during the time
frame of the rate agreement, even if the
agreement is not on file with NASA.
This will prevent NASA from
overpaying or underpaying for indirect
charges and ensure recipients are
receiving what they are legally allowed.
To address the NASA plan requirements
for awardees from non-NASA
organizations that publish scientific
research or compile digital datasets
resulting from research, development,
and technology programs, NASA is
proposing the following revisions:
• Modify an existing term and
condition, 2 CFR 1800.902 Technical
Publications and Reports, to add a
requirement for awardees with research
and research-related awards to follow
additional reporting requirements at 2
CFR 1800.930 Access to Research
Results.
• Add a new term and condition
requiring recipients to comply with
their approved Data Management Plan
submitted with their proposal, and as
modified upon agreement by the
recipient and NASA from time to time
during the course of the period of
performance. In addition, this new term
and condition will ensure that any Final
Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts are
submitted to the NASA-designated
repository, currently the PubMed
Central system at
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, within one year
of peer-review or publication by a
journal, whichever is earlier.
Furthermore, it will ensure that any
publisher’s agreements entered into by
an awardee will allow for the awardee
to comply with these requirements
including submission of Final PeerReviewed Manuscripts to the NASAdesignated repository, currently the
PubMed Central system, with sufficient
rights to permit such repository to use
such Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript
in its normal course, including rights to
permit users to download XML and
plain text formats. Finally, the grantee
agrees to be responsible for, and defend
NASA against, any royalties, fees, or
other costs claimed against NASA or for
which NASA may be held liable as a
consequence of awardee failing to
comply with the foregoing and include
in annual and final reports a list of Final
Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts covered by
this term and condition.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Apr 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
proposed rule is not a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804.
■
■
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C
chapter 35; however, these changes to 2
CFR part 1800 do not impose additional
information collection requirements to
the paperwork burden previously
approved under OMB Control Number
2700–0092, entitled Financial Assistant
Awards/Grants and Cooperative
Agreements.
1800.929 Indirect Costs
Prescription —The Grant Officer shall
include this term and condition in all awards
with indirect costs, excluding those awards
using the 10% de minimis rate.
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 1800
Government financial assistance.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, 2 CFR part 1800 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1800—UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS,
COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT
REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
AWARDS
1. The authority citation for 2 CFR
part 1800 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(e), Pub. L. 97–
258, 96 Stat. 1003 (31 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.),
and 2 CFR part 200.
2. Revise § 1800.210 to read as
follows:
■
§ 1800.210 Information contained in a
Federal award.
NASA waives the requirement for the
inclusion of indirect cost rates on any
notice of Federal award for commercial
firms with no cost sharing requirement.
The terms and conditions for NASA
may be found at Appendix B of this Part
and https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/
pub_library/srba.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Amend Appendix B to part 1800 by:
a. Under 1800.902 Technical
Publications and Reports, adding
paragraph (a)(4); and
■ b. Adding 1800.929 Indirect Costs and
1800.930 Access to Research Results.
The additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 1800—Terms and
Conditions
*
*
1800.902
Reports
*
*
*
*
Technical Publications and
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
*
*
(4) For research and research-related
awards, see additional reporting
requirements at 1800.930 Access to Research
Results.
*
*
*
*
*
Indirect Costs
If during the course of this award, the
approved indirect cost rate is revised,
changed or removed, that rate must be
applied, as allowed, to the covered direct
costs that are expended during the time
frame of that rate agreement. Any corrections,
either up or down, to the approved budget
submitted with the awarded application must
be reflected in the awardees’ records of costs
and should be audited as such.
(End of Term and Condition)
1800.930 Access to Research Results
Prescription—The Grant Officer shall
include this term and condition in all
research and research-related awards.
Access to Research Results
(a) This award is subject to the
requirements of the, ‘‘NASA Plan: Increasing
Access to the Results of Scientific Research,’’
which covers public access to digital
scientific data and peer-reviewed
publications. For purposes of this term and
condition, the following definitions apply:
(1) Awardee: Any recipient of a NASA
grant or cooperative agreement, its
investigators, and subrecipient (subaward or
contract as defined in 2 CFR part 200.92 and
200.22, respectively) at any level.
(2) Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript: The
final text version of a peer-reviewed article
disclosing the results of scientific research
which is authored or co-authored by the
Awardee or funded, in whole or in part, with
funds from a NASA award, that includes all
modifications from the publishing peer
review process, and all graphics and
supplemental material associated with the
article.
(b) The recipient shall:
(1) Comply with their approved Data
Management Plan submitted with its
proposal, and as modified upon agreement by
the recipient and NASA from time to time
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules
during the course of the period of
performance.
(2) Ensure that any Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscript is submitted to the NASAdesignated repository, currently the PubMed
Central system at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Ensure that the Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscript is submitted to PubMed Central
within one year of peer-review or publication
by a journal, whichever is earlier.
(3) Ensure that any publisher’s agreements
entered into by an Awardee will allow for the
Awardee to comply with these requirements
including submission of Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscripts to the NASA-designated
repository, as listed in the above bullet, with
sufficient rights to permit such repository to
use such Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript in
its normal course, including rights to permit
users to download XML and plain text
formats.
(4) Agree to be responsible for, and defend
NASA against, any royalties, fees, or other
costs claimed against NASA or for which
NASA may be held liable as a consequence
of Awardee failing to comply with the
foregoing. Include in annual and final reports
a list of Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts
covered by this term and condition.
(End of Term and Condition)
[FR Doc. 2016–09625 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AN37
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition
of the Asheville, NC, and Charlotte, NC,
Appropriated Fund Federal Wage
System Wage Areas
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a
proposed rule that would redefine the
geographic boundaries of the Asheville,
NC, and Charlotte, NC, appropriated
fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage
areas. The proposed rule would redefine
Alexander and Catawba Counties, NC,
from the Charlotte wage area to the
Asheville wage area. These changes are
based on a recent consensus
recommendation of the Federal
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee
(FPRAC) to best match the counties
proposed for redefinition to a nearby
FWS survey area. There are no FWS
employees stationed in Alexander or
Catawba Counties.
DATES: We must receive comments on or
before May 27, 2016.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Apr 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘RIN 3206–AN37,’’ using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Brenda L. Roberts, Deputy
Associate Director for Pay and Leave,
Employee Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31,
1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC
20415–8200.
Email: pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606–2858;
email pay-leave-policy@opm.gov; or
FAX: (202) 606–4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is
issuing a proposed rule that would
redefine the geographic boundaries of
the Asheville, NC, and Charlotte, NC,
appropriated fund FWS wage areas. The
proposed rule would redefine
Alexander and Catawba Counties, NC,
from the Charlotte wage area to the
Asheville wage area.
OPM considers the following
regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211
when defining FWS wage area
boundaries:
(i) Distance, transportation facilities,
and geographic features;
(ii) Commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities in overall population,
employment, and the kinds and sizes of
private industrial establishments.
In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR
532.211 do not permit splitting
Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
for the purpose of defining a wage area,
except in very unusual circumstances.
Alexander, Burke, Caldwell, and
Catawba Counties, NC, comprise the
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC, MSA.
The Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton MSA is
split between the Asheville, NC, and
Charlotte, NC, wage areas. Burke and
Caldwell Counties are part of the area of
application of the Asheville wage area
and Alexander and Catawba Counties
are part of the area of application of the
Charlotte wage area.
Based on an analysis of the regulatory
criteria for Caldwell County, the core
county in the Hickory-LenoirMorganton MSA, the entire HickoryLenoir-Morganton MSA would be
defined to the Asheville wage area.
When measuring to cities, the distance
criterion does not favor one wage area
more than another. When measuring to
host installations, the distance criterion
favors the Asheville wage area more
than the Charlotte wage area. The
commuting patterns criterion does not
favor one wage area more than another.
Caldwell County resembles the
Asheville survey area more than the
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24737
Charlotte survey area in terms of the
overall population and employment and
the kinds and sizes of private industrial
establishments criteria.
Based on this analysis, we believe
Caldwell County is appropriately
defined to the Asheville wage area.
OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211
permit splitting MSAs only in very
unusual circumstances. There appear to
be no unusual circumstances that would
permit splitting the BloomsburgBerwick MSA. To comply with OPM
regulations not to split MSAs,
Alexander and Catawba Counties would
be redefined to the Asheville wage area.
The remaining county in the HickoryLenoir-Morganton MSA, Burke County,
is already defined to the Asheville wage
area. There are currently no FWS
employees working in Alexander and
Catawba Counties.
FPRAC, the national labormanagement committee responsible for
advising OPM on matters concerning
the pay of FWS employees,
recommended this change by
consensus. This change would be
effective on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after 30 days following publication of
the final regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they would affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Beth F. Cobert,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management is proposing to
amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—
Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
2. Appendix C to subpart B is
amended by revising the wage area
listings for the proposed rule that would
redefine the geographic boundaries of
the wage areas to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24735-24737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09625]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 24735]]
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
2 CFR Part 1800
RIN 2700-AE29
Federal Regulation Supplement: Revisions to Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (NASA Case 2015-N030)
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NASA is proposing to amend the NASA regulation, titled Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards to modify the requirements related to information
contained in a Federal award for commercial firms with no cost sharing
requirement and to add new or modify existing terms and conditions
related to indirect cost charges and access to research results.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before June 27, 2016, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by NASA Case 2015-N030, using any
of the following methods:
[cir] Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``NASA Case 2015-N030''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``NASA Case
2015-N030.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``NASA Case 2015-N030'' on your attached document.
[cir] Email: jennifer.l.richards@nasa.gov. Include NASA Case 2015-
N030 in the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: (202) 358-3082.
[cir] Mail: National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Headquarters, Office of Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy
Division, Attn: Ms. Jennifer Richards, Room 5M34, 300 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20546-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jennifer Richards, NASA HQ, Office
of Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy Division, Room 5M34, 300 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20456-0001. Telephone 202-358-0047;
facsimile 202-358-3082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NASA is proposing the following changes to NASA regulation Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (2 CFR part 1800):
1. Modify the requirement related to information contained in a
Federal award for commercial firms with no cost sharing requirement.
NASA requirements for information contained in a Federal award can be
found at 2 CFR 1800.210, which adopts and supplements 2 CFR 200.210.
Title 2 CFR 200.210 includes a list of data elements that must be
included in a Federal award, including indirect cost rate for the
Federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged per Sec.
200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs). Although 2 CFR part 200 does not apply
to commercial firms, NASA, in its adoption of the regulation at 2 CFR
1800.3, Applicability, added commercial firms with no cost sharing
requirement to the list of applicable entities. Therefore, the
requirement to include an indirect cost rate on a notice of Federal
award is applicable to commercial firms with no cost sharing
requirement.
2. Add a new term and condition to address those instances when a
recipient has a change in its negotiated indirect cost rate agreement
during the period of performance of an award. See 2 CFR 200.56, 200.57,
and 200.414 for more information on indirect (facilities &
administrative) costs. NASA has discovered that, on occasion, when a
recipient's indirect cost rate has changed as a result of a new
negotiated indirect cost rate agreement, the change in rate has not
always been captured when indirect costs have been charged to NASA. As
a result, some recipients have either overcharged or undercharged NASA
for indirect costs.
3. Modify an existing term and condition and add a new term and
condition to ensure recipients meet requirements associated with,
``NASA Plan: Increasing Access to the Results of Scientific Research''
(see https://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2015/07/08/NASA_Plan_for_increasing_access_to_results_of_federally_funded_research1.pdf). This plan was issued in response to the Executive Office of the
President's, Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Memorandum
for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, dated February 22,
2013, ``Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific
Research.'' Through this memorandum, OSTP directed all agencies with
more than $100 million in annual research and development expenditures
to prepare a plan for improving the public's access to the results of
federally funded research. Part A of NASA's plan focuses on digital
unclassified scientific research data, which are research data that can
be stored digitally and accessed electronically.
To facilitate increased access to such data, NASA has updated its
research data policy to require all investigators submitting a research
proposal or research project plan to NASA to include a Data Management
Plan for managing and providing access to final research data or to
state why their data cannot or need not be made publicly available.
Part B of the plan focuses on the public access to peer-reviewed
scientific research manuscripts. The scope of applicability of this
part includes all final peer-reviewed scientific research manuscripts
authored or coauthored by investigators funded for this research by
NASA-appropriated funds.
II. Analysis
After consideration of feedback from commercial firms expressing
concern that indirect cost rates are sensitive financial information
which should not be available on documents that could potentially be
released to the public, NASA has determined that excluding indirect
cost rates from notices of Federal award to commercial firms with no
cost sharing requirement is a prudent business decision that protects
sensitive financial information.
[[Page 24736]]
In order to ensure that the permitted amount of indirect costs is
being charged to an award, NASA is proposing a new term and condition
requiring recipients that have changes to their indirect cost rate
agreement during the period of performance of an award to apply the
approved rate to covered direct costs expended during the time frame of
the rate agreement, even if the agreement is not on file with NASA.
This will prevent NASA from overpaying or underpaying for indirect
charges and ensure recipients are receiving what they are legally
allowed. To address the NASA plan requirements for awardees from non-
NASA organizations that publish scientific research or compile digital
datasets resulting from research, development, and technology programs,
NASA is proposing the following revisions:
Modify an existing term and condition, 2 CFR 1800.902
Technical Publications and Reports, to add a requirement for awardees
with research and research-related awards to follow additional
reporting requirements at 2 CFR 1800.930 Access to Research Results.
Add a new term and condition requiring recipients to
comply with their approved Data Management Plan submitted with their
proposal, and as modified upon agreement by the recipient and NASA from
time to time during the course of the period of performance. In
addition, this new term and condition will ensure that any Final Peer-
Reviewed Manuscripts are submitted to the NASA-designated repository,
currently the PubMed Central system at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, within one
year of peer-review or publication by a journal, whichever is earlier.
Furthermore, it will ensure that any publisher's agreements entered
into by an awardee will allow for the awardee to comply with these
requirements including submission of Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts to
the NASA-designated repository, currently the PubMed Central system,
with sufficient rights to permit such repository to use such Final
Peer-Reviewed Manuscript in its normal course, including rights to
permit users to download XML and plain text formats. Finally, the
grantee agrees to be responsible for, and defend NASA against, any
royalties, fees, or other costs claimed against NASA or for which NASA
may be held liable as a consequence of awardee failing to comply with
the foregoing and include in annual and final reports a list of Final
Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts covered by this term and condition.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This proposed rule is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C chapter 35; however, these
changes to 2 CFR part 1800 do not impose additional information
collection requirements to the paperwork burden previously approved
under OMB Control Number 2700-0092, entitled Financial Assistant
Awards/Grants and Cooperative Agreements.
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 1800
Government financial assistance.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, 2 CFR part 1800 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1800--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
0
1. The authority citation for 2 CFR part 1800 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(e), Pub. L. 97-258, 96 Stat. 1003 (31
U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), and 2 CFR part 200.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1800.210 to read as follows:
Sec. 1800.210 Information contained in a Federal award.
NASA waives the requirement for the inclusion of indirect cost
rates on any notice of Federal award for commercial firms with no cost
sharing requirement. The terms and conditions for NASA may be found at
Appendix B of this Part and https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/srba.
0
3. Amend Appendix B to part 1800 by:
0
a. Under 1800.902 Technical Publications and Reports, adding paragraph
(a)(4); and
0
b. Adding 1800.929 Indirect Costs and 1800.930 Access to Research
Results.
The additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 1800--Terms and Conditions
* * * * *
1800.902 Technical Publications and Reports
* * * * *
(a) * * *
* * * * *
(4) For research and research-related awards, see additional
reporting requirements at 1800.930 Access to Research Results.
* * * * *
1800.929 Indirect Costs
Prescription --The Grant Officer shall include this term and
condition in all awards with indirect costs, excluding those awards
using the 10% de minimis rate.
Indirect Costs
If during the course of this award, the approved indirect cost
rate is revised, changed or removed, that rate must be applied, as
allowed, to the covered direct costs that are expended during the
time frame of that rate agreement. Any corrections, either up or
down, to the approved budget submitted with the awarded application
must be reflected in the awardees' records of costs and should be
audited as such.
(End of Term and Condition)
1800.930 Access to Research Results
Prescription--The Grant Officer shall include this term and
condition in all research and research-related awards.
Access to Research Results
(a) This award is subject to the requirements of the, ``NASA
Plan: Increasing Access to the Results of Scientific Research,''
which covers public access to digital scientific data and peer-
reviewed publications. For purposes of this term and condition, the
following definitions apply:
(1) Awardee: Any recipient of a NASA grant or cooperative
agreement, its investigators, and subrecipient (subaward or contract
as defined in 2 CFR part 200.92 and 200.22, respectively) at any
level.
(2) Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript: The final text version of a
peer-reviewed article disclosing the results of scientific research
which is authored or co-authored by the Awardee or funded, in whole
or in part, with funds from a NASA award, that includes all
modifications from the publishing peer review process, and all
graphics and supplemental material associated with the article.
(b) The recipient shall:
(1) Comply with their approved Data Management Plan submitted
with its proposal, and as modified upon agreement by the recipient
and NASA from time to time
[[Page 24737]]
during the course of the period of performance.
(2) Ensure that any Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript is submitted
to the NASA-designated repository, currently the PubMed Central
system at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Ensure that the Final Peer-Reviewed
Manuscript is submitted to PubMed Central within one year of peer-
review or publication by a journal, whichever is earlier.
(3) Ensure that any publisher's agreements entered into by an
Awardee will allow for the Awardee to comply with these requirements
including submission of Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts to the NASA-
designated repository, as listed in the above bullet, with
sufficient rights to permit such repository to use such Final Peer-
Reviewed Manuscript in its normal course, including rights to permit
users to download XML and plain text formats.
(4) Agree to be responsible for, and defend NASA against, any
royalties, fees, or other costs claimed against NASA or for which
NASA may be held liable as a consequence of Awardee failing to
comply with the foregoing. Include in annual and final reports a
list of Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscripts covered by this term and
condition.
(End of Term and Condition)
[FR Doc. 2016-09625 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P