Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 24171-24172 [2016-09445]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2016 / Notices
merit and made a determination that
these applicants do not satisfy the
criteria eligibility or meet the terms and
conditions of the Federal exemption
program. Each applicant has, prior to
this notice, received a letter of final
disposition on the exemption request.
Those decision letters fully outlined the
basis for the denial and constitute final
Agency action. The list published in
this notice summarizes the Agency’s
recent denials as required under 49
U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by periodically
publishing names and reasons for
denial.
The following 4 applicants did not
have sufficient driving experience over
the past 3 years under normal highway
operating conditions: Bradlee J.
Durham, Nolan B. Dykema, Jerry M.
Elsberry, Jr., James A. Pugh.
The following 23 applicants had no
experience operating a CMV: Jeret D.
Akers, Jose G. Alvarez, Cristian D.
Berlingeri, Larry G. Buchanan, Enedino
A. Burgos, Michael E. Carter, Shernard
Cook, Benjamin J. Curtis, Larry L. Davis,
Jr., Jesse J. DeRico, Brent I. Gruszka,
Andrei I. Gusakov, Damian Klyza,
Miriam Laing, Patrick N. Lancaster,
Daniel F. Large, Curtis G. Myrah, Omar
Orozco, Moises A. Portillo, Samuel C.
Rodriguez, Mark J. Smithson, William B.
Stiles, Sr., Michael H. Taylor.
The following 22 applicants did not
have 3 years of experience driving a
CMV on public highways with their
vision deficiencies: Osman M. Adanalic,
Christopher L. Bolding, William H.
Conley, Fernando Cuevas, Fred L.
Curtis, Kurt D. Davis, Adriano De
Vargas, Alex J. Demaree, Dennis C.
Durstine, Howard G. Edgar, Hamid
Ferdowsi, Eric S. Hill, Wayde J. Isbell,
Lloyd H. Kiihn, Earl B. Moffatt, Bryan
S. Moses, Ronald R. Regier, John A.
Ruggiero, Timothy P. Ryan, Charles E.
Schrecengost, Barney R. Stephens, Larry
L. Stewart.
The following 16 applicants did not
have 3 years of recent experience
driving a CMV with the vision
deficiency: John F. Armstrong, Gerald L.
Barber, Daniel J. Council, Helmut
Danecker, Anthony R. Dirjan, David N.
Groves, Antonio A. Jackson, Herman R.
Lee, Jr., Robert C. Mason, Wayne C.
Merry, Sherard L. Orange, Daniel D.
Sandoval, Edward V. Skowronski, Colby
T. Smith, Kenneth L. Sutphin, Bryan H.
Walker.
The following 12 applicants did not
have sufficient driving experience
during the past 3 years under normal
highway operating conditions: Joshua L.
Arnold, Kevin D. Duffy, Thomas M.
Hallwig, Gabriel L. Harrison, Richard K.
Hemmingsen, Gerardo Hernandez, Raul
T. Leiva, Nathan M. Magaard, Mark
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Apr 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
Paugh, Gregory M. Quilling, Chad M.
Smith, Jeffrey L. Tanner.
The following 2 applicants had their
commercial driver’s licenses suspended
during the previous 3-year period:
Michael J. Achille, Tydrick D. Brooks.
The following 3 applicants
contributed to an accident(s) while
operating a CMV: Thomas R. Abbott,
Timothy L. Bauman, Randy J. Miller.
The following applicant, Thomas D.
Jacobsen, did not hold a license which
allowed operation of vehicles over
26,000 lbs. for all or part of the previous
3-year period.
The following applicant, Toby L.
Simmons, did not have an optometrist
or ophthalmologist willing to make a
statement that they are able to operate
a commercial vehicle from a vision
standpoint.
The following 9 applicants were
denied for multiple reasons: Joseph D.
Allen, Dennis M. Coley, Timothy W.
Detweiler, Hector O. Flores, Jonathan M.
Gilligan, David P. Mello, Edward R.
Slater, Hawthorne B. Smith, Thomas D.
Walsh.
The following applicant, Christopher
D. Boyd, did not have stable vision for
the entire 3-year period.
The following 13 applicants met the
current federal vision standards.
Exemptions are not required for
applicants who meet the current
regulations for vision: Hani Abiyounes,
Kendall K. Chandler, Chad A. Curtis,
Shorty Ellis, Karl D. Graves, Carl
Groves, Alexander J. Hartelust, Lark M.
Hartsock, James E. Jordon, Dorvin R.
Neuberger, Peter J. Niedzwiecki, Raimer
A. Paredes-Escano, Timothy T. Tyree.
The following 3 applicants drove
interstate while restricted to intrastate:
Adrienne J. Allen, James L. Jones, Troy
A. Stephens.
The following 19 applicants will not
be driving interstate, interstate
commerce, or are not required to carry
a DOT medical card: Gary W. Brockway,
Fredrick Brown, Richard C. Brust,
Joseph L. Cohea, Robert L. Damron,
James E. Donaldson, Richard Duran,
Freddie M. Henderson, Brian D. Hoover,
Ron E. Hullett, Walter J. Jurczak, Keith
Kebschull, Charles J. Kruggel, Lois J.
Mahar, Dustin M. Mills, Wilbur
Robinson, Jr., Robert G. Schoenborn,
Phillip J. Will, James L. Yingst.
Finally, the following 8 applicants
perform transportation for the federal
government, state, or any political subdivision of the state. Randy L. Coney,
Rodriquez D. Evans, Jose A. Flores, Ira
D. Manuelito, Steven C. Myers, Leif H.
Stensrud, Joshua E. Weicht, Aaron E.
Zelmer.
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24171
Issued on: April 18, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–09529 Filed 4–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2015–0019]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated
February 11, 2016, Norfolk Southern
Railway (NS) requested that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) Railroad
Safety Board (Board) approve an
amendment to its existing waiver in
order to expand the territory inspected
pursuant to its nonstop continuous rail
testing process. The projected starting
date for implementing the expansion
would be March 1, 2016, and the testing
process would continue up to July 1,
2018.
The original waiver grants relief from
49 CFR 213.113(a) and allows NS to
perform a continuous rail test process
on certain designated tracks in lieu of
the stop/start rail testing required by the
regulation. NS is currently using
nonstop continuous testing on the main
tracks of the Dearborn Division, Chicago
Line (Cleveland, OH, to Chicago, IL,
Milepost (MP) CD 181.2–523.3)). Once
this district has been completed, NS
would expand the continuous testing
process to the following locations: (1)
Dearborn Division Cleveland Line
(Ravenna to Drawbridge, MP RD 85.9–
123.2), Chicago District (Chicago, IL, to
Hobart, IN, MP B 518.7–486.5), Lake
Erie District (Euclid to Bay Village, B
172.0–197.3); (2) Lake Division Chicago,
Fostoria, and Cleveland Districts
(Hobart, IN, to Bay Village, OH, MPB
486.5–197.3); (3) Pittsburgh Division,
Fort Wayne Line (Pittsburgh, PA, to
Crestline, OH, MP PC 0.0–188.7),
Pittsburgh Line (Pittsburgh, PA, to CP
Cannon MP, PT 353.5–119.1),
Conemaugh Line (CP Conpit to CP Penn
MP LC 0.0–77.9), Lake Erie District
(Euclid to Ashtabula, B 172.0–129.2),
Cleveland Line (Ravenna to Alliance,
MP RD 85.9–67.2); and (4) Harrisburg
Division, Pittsburgh Line (Harris to CP
Cannon, MP PT 104.9–119.1),
Harrisburg Line (Falls to Harrisburg, PA,
MP HP 5.2–112.9), Port Road Branch
(Port to Banks, MP EP 33.7–76.1 and
Perryville to Port, MP PD 0.3–39.7).
The expanded inspection territories
include: Central Division, Cincinnati,
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24172
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2016 / Notices
New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway
(Cincinnati, OH, to Chattanooga, TN,
MP 2.46–338.2 Tracks 1 and 2); Georgia
Division Atlanta, North District
(Chattanooga, TN, to Atlanta, GA, MP
226.68–235.07 A and 15.12–158.8 H
Tracks 1 and 2); Dearborn Division,
Detroit District (Detroit, MI, to Butler,
IN, MP D 1.4–116.0); and Lake Division,
New Castle District (Mill, OH, to Ft.
Wayne, IN, MP CF 16.5–185.8). NS
plans to test the expanded territories
approximately every 30 to 45 days.
The nonstop continuous rail test
vehicle is a self-propelled ultrasonic/
induction rail flaw detection vehicle
operating at test speeds up to 30 mph.
Upon completion of each daily run, data
is analyzed offline by technical experts
experienced with the process on other
Class I railroads. The analysis
categorizes and prioritizes suspect
locations for post-test field verification
and hand tests. Field verification is
conducted by qualified and certified rail
test professionals with recordable field
validation equipment based on GPS
location and known track features
identified within the flaw detection
electronic record. Remedial actions are
applied based on the findings per 49
CFR 213.113 for confirmed rail defect
locations.
NS’ Engineering Department will
continue to provide FRA’s Rail Integrity
office with rail test reports for review as
required. NS believes expansion of the
nonstop continuous rail testing to
additional territory will continue to
provide the capability to test track more
quickly and frequently, and minimize
the risk of rail service failures.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2015–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:02 Apr 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
0019) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by June 9,
2016 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far
as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). In
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT
solicits comments from the public to
better inform its processes. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the
commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy. See also https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–09445 Filed 4–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2000–7137]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated
February 24, 2016, San Diego Trolley
Incorporated (SDTI) petitioned the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
for a supplemental waiver of
compliance from certain additional
provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained in various parts of
Title 49 of the CFR. FRA assigned the
petition to Docket Number FRA–2000–
7137.
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SDTI seeks a 5-year extension of its
existing waiver, as well as a waiver of
additional regulations, for certain
portions of its light rail transit
operations which employ temporal
separation in order to safely share track
with the general railroad system’s San
Diego and Imperial Valley Railroad.
Contiguous to the shared trackage are
portions with limited connections,
which include a small shared corridor
with BNSF Railway freight service and
Coaster commuter train service (Coaster
also shares a storage yard with SDTI).
FRA granted SDTI its initial waiver on
January 19, 2001, which was extended
for 5 years on September 11, 2006, to
include minor operational changes. The
waiver was most recently extended for
5 years on June 22, 2011, to include
updating CFR section changes made
since 2006. In 2012, SDTI received a
separate waiver from FRA to operate its
SD100 and S70 rolling stock at speeds
that generate cant deficiency not
exceeding 6 inches on its Orange Line
joint use trackage (see Docket Number
FRA–2012–0088). To simplify matters,
SDTI now requests that the relief in both
dockets be baselined into Docket
Number FRA–2000–7137.
After consulting with FRA during an
onsite meeting on March 24, 2016, SDTI
is requesting additional relief from the
following regulatory sections: 49 CFR
part 214, subpart C, Roadway Worker
Protection; part 228, subpart F,
Substantive Hours of Service
Requirements for Train Employees
Engaged in Commuter or Intercity Rail
Passenger Transportation; and part 242,
Qualification and Certification of
Conductors.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM
25APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24171-24172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09445]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA-2015-0019]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated February 11, 2016, Norfolk Southern Railway (NS) requested that
the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Railroad Safety Board (Board)
approve an amendment to its existing waiver in order to expand the
territory inspected pursuant to its nonstop continuous rail testing
process. The projected starting date for implementing the expansion
would be March 1, 2016, and the testing process would continue up to
July 1, 2018.
The original waiver grants relief from 49 CFR 213.113(a) and allows
NS to perform a continuous rail test process on certain designated
tracks in lieu of the stop/start rail testing required by the
regulation. NS is currently using nonstop continuous testing on the
main tracks of the Dearborn Division, Chicago Line (Cleveland, OH, to
Chicago, IL, Milepost (MP) CD 181.2-523.3)). Once this district has
been completed, NS would expand the continuous testing process to the
following locations: (1) Dearborn Division Cleveland Line (Ravenna to
Drawbridge, MP RD 85.9-123.2), Chicago District (Chicago, IL, to
Hobart, IN, MP B 518.7-486.5), Lake Erie District (Euclid to Bay
Village, B 172.0-197.3); (2) Lake Division Chicago, Fostoria, and
Cleveland Districts (Hobart, IN, to Bay Village, OH, MPB 486.5-197.3);
(3) Pittsburgh Division, Fort Wayne Line (Pittsburgh, PA, to Crestline,
OH, MP PC 0.0-188.7), Pittsburgh Line (Pittsburgh, PA, to CP Cannon MP,
PT 353.5-119.1), Conemaugh Line (CP Conpit to CP Penn MP LC 0.0-77.9),
Lake Erie District (Euclid to Ashtabula, B 172.0-129.2), Cleveland Line
(Ravenna to Alliance, MP RD 85.9-67.2); and (4) Harrisburg Division,
Pittsburgh Line (Harris to CP Cannon, MP PT 104.9-119.1), Harrisburg
Line (Falls to Harrisburg, PA, MP HP 5.2-112.9), Port Road Branch (Port
to Banks, MP EP 33.7-76.1 and Perryville to Port, MP PD 0.3-39.7).
The expanded inspection territories include: Central Division,
Cincinnati,
[[Page 24172]]
New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway (Cincinnati, OH, to Chattanooga,
TN, MP 2.46-338.2 Tracks 1 and 2); Georgia Division Atlanta, North
District (Chattanooga, TN, to Atlanta, GA, MP 226.68-235.07 A and
15.12-158.8 H Tracks 1 and 2); Dearborn Division, Detroit District
(Detroit, MI, to Butler, IN, MP D 1.4-116.0); and Lake Division, New
Castle District (Mill, OH, to Ft. Wayne, IN, MP CF 16.5-185.8). NS
plans to test the expanded territories approximately every 30 to 45
days.
The nonstop continuous rail test vehicle is a self-propelled
ultrasonic/induction rail flaw detection vehicle operating at test
speeds up to 30 mph. Upon completion of each daily run, data is
analyzed offline by technical experts experienced with the process on
other Class I railroads. The analysis categorizes and prioritizes
suspect locations for post-test field verification and hand tests.
Field verification is conducted by qualified and certified rail test
professionals with recordable field validation equipment based on GPS
location and known track features identified within the flaw detection
electronic record. Remedial actions are applied based on the findings
per 49 CFR 213.113 for confirmed rail defect locations.
NS' Engineering Department will continue to provide FRA's Rail
Integrity office with rail test reports for review as required. NS
believes expansion of the nonstop continuous rail testing to additional
territory will continue to provide the capability to test track more
quickly and frequently, and minimize the risk of rail service failures.
A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2015-0019) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by June 9, 2016 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
See also https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy
notice of regulations.gov.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-09445 Filed 4-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P