Guidance for Closure of Activities Related to Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation, 23758-23760 [2016-09421]
Download as PDF
23758
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to
provide advice and recommendations
concerning further NSF support for the
Center.
Agenda
Friday, May 16, 2016
8:45 a.m.–9:00 a.m.: Informal Meeting
NSF PDs & MRSEC Director
(CLOSED)
9:00 a.m.–9:05 a.m.: Introductions
9:05 a.m.–10:05 a.m.: Princeton MRSEC
Overview (Yazdani)
10:05 a.m.–10:25 a.m.: Coffee Break
10:25 a.m.–11:25 a.m.: IRGs & SEEDs
11:25 a.m.–11:55 p.m.: Education and
Outreach
12:00 p.m.–1:05 p.m.: Lunch with
MRSEC students and postdocs
1:10 p.m.–2:15 p.m.: Shared
Experimental Facilities Tour
2:15 p.m.–3:00 p.m.: NSF Panel Caucus
(CLOSED)
3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m.: NSF debrief
MRSEC Executive Committee
(CLOSED)
Reason for Closing: The work being
reviewed include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature,
including technical information;
financial data, such as salaries and
personal information concerning
individuals associated with the
proposals. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–09410 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Advisory Committee for Computer and
Information Science and Engineering;
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces the
following meeting:
Name: Advisory Committee for
Computer and Information Science and
Engineering (CISE) (1115).
Date/Time: May 19, 2016; 12:30 p.m.
to 5:30 p.m.; May 20, 2016; 8:30 a.m. to
12:30 p.m.
Place: National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235,
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
Type of Meeting: OPEN.
Contact Person: Brenda Williams,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1105,
Arlington, Virginia 22230; Telephone:
703/292–8900.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on
the impact of its policies, programs and
activities on the CISE community. To
provide advice to the Assistant Director
of NSF for CISE on issues related to
long-range planning, and to form ad hoc
subcommittees and working groups to
carry out needed studies and tasks.
• Welcome and CISE updates
• Program updates for the CISE
divisions of Information and
Intelligent Systems and Computing
and Communication Foundations
• Activities update: Computer Science
for All
• Working group breakout sessions and
report outs: New Partnership Models
for CISE Research; and Data Science
• Closing remarks and wrap-up
10:25 a.m.–11:25 a.m.: IRGs & SEEDs
11:25 a.m.–11:55 p.m.: Education and
Outreach
12:00 p.m.–1:05 p.m.: Lunch with
MRSEC students and postdocs
1:10 p.m.–2:15 p.m.: Shared
Experimental Facilities Tour
2:15 p.m.–3:00 p.m.: NSF Panel Caucus
(Closed)
3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m.: NSF debrief
MRSEC Executive Committee (Closed)
Reason for Closing: The work being
reviewed include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature,
including technical information;
financial data, such as salaries and
personal information concerning
individuals associated with the
proposals. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–09365 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2016–09406 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
Agenda
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Proposal Review Panel for Materials
Research; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463 as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Names: Proposal Review Panel for
Materials Research—Materials Research
Science & Engineering Centers Site
Visit, New York University (V160700)
#1203
Dates and Times: May 13, 2016; 8:45
a.m. EST–3:30 p.m. EST
Place: New York University, New
York, NY
Type of Meeting: Part-Open
Contact Person: Dr. Daniele Finotello,
Program Director, Materials Research
Science & Engineering Centers, MRSEC.
Division of Materials Research, Room
1065, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA
22230, Telephone (703) 292–4676.
Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to
provide advice and recommendations
concerning further NSF support for the
Center.
Agenda:
8:45am–9:00 a.m.: Informal Meeting
NSF PDs & MRSEC Director (Closed)
9:00 a.m.–9:05 a.m.: Introductions
9:05 a.m.–10:05 a.m.: NYU MRSEC
Overview (Ward)
10:05 a.m.–10:25 a.m.: Coffee Break
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
[NRC–2016–0084]
Guidance for Closure of Activities
Related to Recommendation 2.1,
Flooding Hazard Reevaluation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is soliciting public
comment on its draft Japan LessonsLearned Division Interim Staff Guidance
(JLD–ISG), JLD–ISG–2016–01,
‘‘Guidance for Activities Related to
Near-Term Task Force Recommendation
2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation;
Focused Evaluation and Integrated
Assessment.’’ This draft JLD–ISG
revision provides guidance and
clarification to assist operating power
reactor respondents and holders of
construction permits under the NRC’s
regulations with the performance of the
focused evaluations and revised
integrated assessments for external
flooding.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments by May 23,
2016. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (unless
DATES:
Friday, May 13, 2016
PO 00000
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
this document describes a different
method for submitting comments on a
specific subject):
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0084. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Bowman, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–2963; email:
Eric.Bowman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
this notice entitled, Availability of
Documents.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
A. Obtaining Information
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2016–
0084 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC posts all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as entering
the comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2016–
0084 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0084.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. For the
convenience of the reader, the ADAMS
accession numbers for obtaining
materials referenced in this document
are provided in a table in the section of
II. Background
Following the events at the
Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant
on March 11, 2011, the NRC established
a senior-level agency task force referred
to as the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF).
The NTTF was tasked with conducting
a systematic and methodical review of
the NRC regulations and processes, and
determining if the agency should make
additional improvements to these
programs in light of the events at
Fukushima Dai-ichi. As a result of this
review, the NTTF developed a
comprehensive set of recommendations,
documented in SECY–11–0093,
‘‘Recommendations for Enhancing
Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, the
Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Accident,’’ dated July 12, 2011. These
recommendations were enhanced by the
NRC staff following interactions with
stakeholders. Documentation of the
staff’s efforts is contained in SECY–11–
0124, dated September 9, 2011, and
SECY–11–0137, dated October 3, 2011.
As directed by the Commission’s SRM
for SECY–11–0093, the NRC staff
reviewed the NTTF recommendations
within the context of the NRC’s existing
regulatory framework and considered
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23759
the various regulatory vehicles available
to the NRC to implement the
recommendations. In SECY–11–0124
and SECY–11–0137, the staff
established the prioritization of the
recommendations. After receiving the
Commission’s direction in SRM–SECY–
11–0124 and SRM–SECY–11–0137, the
NRC staff issued a request for
information pursuant to section 50.54(f)
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Conditions of
licenses,’’ on March 12, 2012, requesting
licensees to reevaluate the seismic and
flooding hazards at their sites using
updated hazard information and current
regulatory guidance and methodologies.
For plants where the reevaluated hazard
exceeds the plant’s design basis, the
licensee was to conduct an integrated
assessment. The information gathering
is considered to be Phase 1 and was
requested to support Phase 2 decisionmaking and determine whether
available or planned measures provide
sufficient protection and mitigation
capabilities or if further regulatory
action should be pursued in the areas of
seismic and flooding design, and
emergency preparedness.
In COMSECY–14–0037, dated
November 21, 2014, the NRC staff
requested that the Commission review
and approve changes to revise the
Recommendation 2.1 flooding
assessments and integrate the Phase 2
decision-making into the development
and implementation of mitigating
strategies in accordance with Order EA–
12–049 and the related Mitigation of
Beyond-Design-Basis Events
rulemaking.
In SRM–COMSECY–14–0037, the
Commission disapproved this
recommendation. Instead, the
Commission instructed the staff to
develop a closure plan for the flooding
reevaluation activities and to reassess
the existing guidance for performing a
Phase 1 integrated assessment in order
to focus on those plants with the most
potential for safety benefits.
In COMSECY–15–0019, the staff
provided revised guidance for
performing a Phase 1 integrated
assessment and described a modified
process for identifying the list of plants
that would be required to perform an
integrated assessment. The process
proposed by the staff included the
development of a graded, risk-informed
and performance-based approach
consistent with Commission direction to
focus on those plants with the greatest
potential need for safety enhancements.
Specifically, the process included
consideration and evaluation of local
intense precipitation by performing a
focused evaluation of the impact of the
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
23760
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
hazard and implementing any necessary
programmatic, procedural, or plant
modifications to address the hazard,
taking into account available warning
time. The process also considered flood
protection and available physical
margin, where licensees will confirm
the capability of existing flood
protection to address the hazard
exceedance by performing a focused
evaluation. For licensees where the
reevaluated hazard cannot be addressed
via existing or planned flood protection,
the process also includes the
performance of an integrated
assessment, using revised guidance, in
order to conduct more detailed
evaluations of plant response capability.
This revised integrated assessment will
capture, among other information,
quantitative characteristics about the
reliability of various aspects of plant
response (e.g., reliability of equipment
and manual actions), and risk insights
with a focus on cliff-edge effects. The
results will be used by the NRC to
determine whether additional regulatory
action, such as a plant-specific backfit,
are warranted.
In SRM–COMSECY–15–0019, the
Commission approved the staff’s plans
to modify the approach for integrated
assessments to implement a graded
approach for determining the need for,
and prioritization and scope of, plantspecific integrated assessments. As
discussed in COMSECY–15–0019, the
majority of sites with reevaluated
flooding hazards exceeding the designbasis flood are expected to screen out
from the integrated assessment process.
The licensees will instead provide
focused evaluations to ensure
appropriate actions are taken and that
these actions are effective and
reasonable.
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
submitted guidance NEI 16–05,
‘‘External Flooding Assessment
Guidelines,’’ Revision 0, on April 12,
2016. The guidance is an industrydeveloped methodology that describes
the flooding impact assessment process,
which is intended to meet the requested
information of an integrated assessment,
as described in the document titled,
‘‘Request for Information Pursuant to
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of
the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Accident,’’ and to incorporate the
changes described in COMSECY–15–
0019.
Draft ISG JLD ISG 2016–01 is being
issued to describe to stakeholders
methods acceptable to the staff for
performance of the focused evaluations
and revised integrated assessments and
describe some exceptions and
clarifications to NEI 16–05, Revision 0.
This guidance is not intended for use
in design-basis applications or in
regulatory activities beyond the scope of
performing the focused evaluations and
integrated assessment part of NTTF
Recommendation 2.1 flooding activities.
This ISG is being issued in draft form
for public comment to involve the
public in development of the
implementation guidance. Compliance
with the ISG is not required.
III. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the following methods, as indicated.
ADAMS
accession No.
Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March
12, 2012.
SECY–11–0093, ‘‘Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident,’’ dated July 12, 2011.
Commission’s staff requirements memorandum (SRM) for SECY–11–0093, dated August 19, 2011 ..............................................
SECY–11–0124, ‘‘Recommended Actions to be Taken Without Delay from the Near-Term Task Force Report,’’ dated September 9, 2011.
SRM–SECY–11–0124, dated October 18, 2011 ................................................................................................................................
SECY–11–0137, ‘‘Prioritization of Recommended Actions to be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned,’’ dated October 3, 2011.
SRM–SECY–11–0137, dated December 15, 2011 ............................................................................................................................
COMSECY–14–0037, ‘‘Integration of Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events and the Reevaluaton (sic)
of Flooding Hazards,’’ dated November 21, 2014.
SRM–COMSECY–14–0037, dated March 30, 2015 ...........................................................................................................................
COMSECY–15–0019, ‘‘Closure Plan for the Reevaluation of Flooding Hazards for Operating Nuclear Power Plants,’’ dated
June 30, 2015.
SRM–COMSECY–15–0019, dated July 28, 2015 ..............................................................................................................................
NEI 16–05, ‘‘External Flooding Assessment Guidelines,’’ Rev. 0, dated April 12, 2016 ...................................................................
Draft JLD–ISG–2016–01 ‘‘Guidance For Activities Related To Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard
Reevaluation; Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment,’’ Revision 0.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Document title
ML12053A340
The NRC may post materials related
to this document, including public
comments, on the Federal rulemaking
Web site at https://www.regulations.gov
under Docket ID NRC–2016–0084. The
Federal rulemaking Web site allows you
to receive alerts when changes or
additions occur in a docket folder. To
subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket
folder (NRC–2016–0084); (2) click the
‘‘Sign up for Email Alerts’’ link; and (3)
enter your email address and select how
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
ML11186A950
ML112310021
ML11245A158
ML112911571
ML11272A111
ML113490055
ML14238A616
ML15089A236
ML15153A104
ML15209A682
ML16105A327
ML16090A140
frequently you would like to receive
emails (daily, weekly, or monthly).
public comments received in response
to this request.
Proposed Action
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of April, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gregory Bowman,
Acting Director, Japan Lessons-Learned
Division, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
By this action, the NRC is requesting
public comments on draft ISG JLD–ISG–
2016–01. This draft JLD–ISG proposes
guidance related to the performance of
a focused evaluation and integrated
assessment as part of NTTF 2.1 flooding
activities. The NRC staff will make a
final determination regarding issuance
of the JLD–ISG after it considers any
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
[FR Doc. 2016–09421 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23758-23760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09421]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2016-0084]
Guidance for Closure of Activities Related to Recommendation 2.1,
Flooding Hazard Reevaluation
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting
public comment on its draft Japan Lessons-Learned Division Interim
Staff Guidance (JLD-ISG), JLD-ISG-2016-01, ``Guidance for Activities
Related to Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard
Reevaluation; Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment.'' This
draft JLD-ISG revision provides guidance and clarification to assist
operating power reactor respondents and holders of construction permits
under the NRC's regulations with the performance of the focused
evaluations and revised integrated assessments for external flooding.
DATES: Submit comments by May 23, 2016. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(unless
[[Page 23759]]
this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a
specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0084. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Bowman, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-2963; email: Eric.Bowman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0084 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0084.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. For the convenience of the reader,
the ADAMS accession numbers for obtaining materials referenced in this
document are provided in a table in the section of this notice
entitled, Availability of Documents.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2016-0084 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. Background
Following the events at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant
on March 11, 2011, the NRC established a senior-level agency task force
referred to as the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF was tasked
with conducting a systematic and methodical review of the NRC
regulations and processes, and determining if the agency should make
additional improvements to these programs in light of the events at
Fukushima Dai-ichi. As a result of this review, the NTTF developed a
comprehensive set of recommendations, documented in SECY-11-0093,
``Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, the
Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Accident,'' dated July 12, 2011. These recommendations were enhanced by
the NRC staff following interactions with stakeholders. Documentation
of the staff's efforts is contained in SECY-11-0124, dated September 9,
2011, and SECY-11-0137, dated October 3, 2011.
As directed by the Commission's SRM for SECY-11-0093, the NRC staff
reviewed the NTTF recommendations within the context of the NRC's
existing regulatory framework and considered the various regulatory
vehicles available to the NRC to implement the recommendations. In
SECY-11-0124 and SECY-11-0137, the staff established the prioritization
of the recommendations. After receiving the Commission's direction in
SRM-SECY-11-0124 and SRM-SECY-11-0137, the NRC staff issued a request
for information pursuant to section 50.54(f) of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Conditions of licenses,'' on March 12,
2012, requesting licensees to reevaluate the seismic and flooding
hazards at their sites using updated hazard information and current
regulatory guidance and methodologies. For plants where the reevaluated
hazard exceeds the plant's design basis, the licensee was to conduct an
integrated assessment. The information gathering is considered to be
Phase 1 and was requested to support Phase 2 decision-making and
determine whether available or planned measures provide sufficient
protection and mitigation capabilities or if further regulatory action
should be pursued in the areas of seismic and flooding design, and
emergency preparedness.
In COMSECY-14-0037, dated November 21, 2014, the NRC staff
requested that the Commission review and approve changes to revise the
Recommendation 2.1 flooding assessments and integrate the Phase 2
decision-making into the development and implementation of mitigating
strategies in accordance with Order EA-12-049 and the related
Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events rulemaking.
In SRM-COMSECY-14-0037, the Commission disapproved this
recommendation. Instead, the Commission instructed the staff to develop
a closure plan for the flooding reevaluation activities and to reassess
the existing guidance for performing a Phase 1 integrated assessment in
order to focus on those plants with the most potential for safety
benefits.
In COMSECY-15-0019, the staff provided revised guidance for
performing a Phase 1 integrated assessment and described a modified
process for identifying the list of plants that would be required to
perform an integrated assessment. The process proposed by the staff
included the development of a graded, risk-informed and performance-
based approach consistent with Commission direction to focus on those
plants with the greatest potential need for safety enhancements.
Specifically, the process included consideration and evaluation of
local intense precipitation by performing a focused evaluation of the
impact of the
[[Page 23760]]
hazard and implementing any necessary programmatic, procedural, or
plant modifications to address the hazard, taking into account
available warning time. The process also considered flood protection
and available physical margin, where licensees will confirm the
capability of existing flood protection to address the hazard
exceedance by performing a focused evaluation. For licensees where the
reevaluated hazard cannot be addressed via existing or planned flood
protection, the process also includes the performance of an integrated
assessment, using revised guidance, in order to conduct more detailed
evaluations of plant response capability. This revised integrated
assessment will capture, among other information, quantitative
characteristics about the reliability of various aspects of plant
response (e.g., reliability of equipment and manual actions), and risk
insights with a focus on cliff-edge effects. The results will be used
by the NRC to determine whether additional regulatory action, such as a
plant-specific backfit, are warranted.
In SRM-COMSECY-15-0019, the Commission approved the staff's plans
to modify the approach for integrated assessments to implement a graded
approach for determining the need for, and prioritization and scope of,
plant-specific integrated assessments. As discussed in COMSECY-15-0019,
the majority of sites with reevaluated flooding hazards exceeding the
design-basis flood are expected to screen out from the integrated
assessment process. The licensees will instead provide focused
evaluations to ensure appropriate actions are taken and that these
actions are effective and reasonable.
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted guidance NEI 16-05,
``External Flooding Assessment Guidelines,'' Revision 0, on April 12,
2016. The guidance is an industry-developed methodology that describes
the flooding impact assessment process, which is intended to meet the
requested information of an integrated assessment, as described in the
document titled, ``Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations
2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from
the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident,'' and to incorporate the changes
described in COMSECY-15-0019.
Draft ISG JLD ISG 2016-01 is being issued to describe to
stakeholders methods acceptable to the staff for performance of the
focused evaluations and revised integrated assessments and describe
some exceptions and clarifications to NEI 16-05, Revision 0.
This guidance is not intended for use in design-basis applications
or in regulatory activities beyond the scope of performing the focused
evaluations and integrated assessment part of NTTF Recommendation 2.1
flooding activities. This ISG is being issued in draft form for public
comment to involve the public in development of the implementation
guidance. Compliance with the ISG is not required.
III. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document title ADAMS accession No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Information Pursuant to Title ML12053A340
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) 50.54(f) Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of
the Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Accident, dated March 12, 2012.
SECY-11-0093, ``Recommendations for ML11186A950
Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st
Century, the Near-Term Task Force Review
of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Accident,'' dated July 12, 2011.
Commission's staff requirements ML112310021
memorandum (SRM) for SECY-11-0093, dated
August 19, 2011.
SECY-11-0124, ``Recommended Actions to be ML11245A158
Taken Without Delay from the Near-Term
Task Force Report,'' dated September 9,
2011.
SRM-SECY-11-0124, dated October 18, 2011. ML112911571
SECY-11-0137, ``Prioritization of ML11272A111
Recommended Actions to be Taken in
Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned,''
dated October 3, 2011.
SRM-SECY-11-0137, dated December 15, 2011 ML113490055
COMSECY-14-0037, ``Integration of ML14238A616
Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design-
Basis External Events and the
Reevaluaton (sic) of Flooding Hazards,''
dated November 21, 2014.
SRM-COMSECY-14-0037, dated March 30, 2015 ML15089A236
COMSECY-15-0019, ``Closure Plan for the ML15153A104
Reevaluation of Flooding Hazards for
Operating Nuclear Power Plants,'' dated
June 30, 2015.
SRM-COMSECY-15-0019, dated July 28, 2015. ML15209A682
NEI 16-05, ``External Flooding Assessment ML16105A327
Guidelines,'' Rev. 0, dated April 12,
2016.
Draft JLD-ISG-2016-01 ``Guidance For ML16090A140
Activities Related To Near-Term Task
Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding
Hazard Reevaluation; Focused Evaluation
and Integrated Assessment,'' Revision 0.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRC may post materials related to this document, including
public comments, on the Federal rulemaking Web site at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2016-0084. The Federal
rulemaking Web site allows you to receive alerts when changes or
additions occur in a docket folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the
docket folder (NRC-2016-0084); (2) click the ``Sign up for Email
Alerts'' link; and (3) enter your email address and select how
frequently you would like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or
monthly).
Proposed Action
By this action, the NRC is requesting public comments on draft ISG
JLD-ISG-2016-01. This draft JLD-ISG proposes guidance related to the
performance of a focused evaluation and integrated assessment as part
of NTTF 2.1 flooding activities. The NRC staff will make a final
determination regarding issuance of the JLD-ISG after it considers any
public comments received in response to this request.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of April, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Gregory Bowman,
Acting Director, Japan Lessons-Learned Division, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2016-09421 Filed 4-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P