Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; LUZU, 23722-23723 [2016-09374]
Download as PDF
23722
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–E–2329]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; LUZU
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for LUZU
and is publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that human drug
product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 21, 2016.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 19, 2016. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2014–E–2329, For Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; LUZU. Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION’’. The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of USPTO may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
human drug product LUZU
(luliconazole). LUZU is indicated for
topical treatment of interdigital tinea
pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis
caused by the organisms Tricophyton
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
rubrum and Epidermophyton floccosum
in patients 18 years of age and older.
Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO
received a patent term restoration
application for LUZU (U.S. Patent No.
5,900,488) from Nihon Nohyaku Co.,
Ltd., and the USPTO requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated May 11, 2015, FDA
advised the USPTO that this human
drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of LUZU represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period. To meet its burden, the petition
must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1,
98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
LUZU is 2,242 days. Of this time, 1,903
days occurred during the testing phase
of the regulatory review period, while
339 days occurred during the approval
phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
September 27, 2007. FDA has verified
the Nihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd. claim that
September 27, 2007, is the date the
investigational new drug application
(IND) became effective.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the FD&C Act: December 11,
2012. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the new drug application
(NDA) for LUZU (NDA 204153) was
initially submitted on December 11,
2012.
3. The date the application was
approved: November 14, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
204153 was approved on November 14,
2013.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,289 days of patent
term extension.
Dated: April 18, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and ask for a redetermination
(see DATES). Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:18 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–09374 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
23723
vitro diagnostic tests for detection of
Zika virus and/or diagnosis of Zika
virus infection subject to the terms of
any authorization issued under the
FD&C Act. The Authorization, which
includes an explanation of the reasons
for issuance, is reprinted in this
document.
The Authorization is effective as
of March 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the EUA to the Office
of Counterterrorism and Emerging
Threats, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1,
Rm. 4338, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist that office in processing
your request or include a fax number to
which the Authorization may be sent.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the
Authorization.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0969]
Authorization of Emergency Use of an
In Vitro Diagnostic Device for
Detection of Zika Virus; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
issuance of an Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) (the Authorization)
for an in vitro diagnostic device for
detection of Zika virus in response to
the Zika virus outbreak in the Americas.
FDA issued this Authorization under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act), as requested by the
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC). The Authorization
contains, among other things,
conditions on the emergency use of the
authorized in vitro diagnostic device.
The Authorization follows the February
26, 2016, determination by the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) Secretary that there is a
significant potential for a public health
emergency that has a significant
potential to affect national security or
the health and security of U.S. citizens
living abroad and that involves Zika
virus. On the basis of such
determination, the HHS Secretary
declared on February 26, 2016, that
circumstances exist justifying the
authorization of emergency use of in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Carmen Maher, Office of
Counterterrorism and Emerging Threats,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm.
4347, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–796–8510 (this is not a toll free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 564 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360bbb–3) as amended by the
Project BioShield Act of 2004 (Pub. L.
108–276) and the Pandemic and AllHazards Preparedness Reauthorization
Act of 2013 (Pub. L. 113–5) allows FDA
to strengthen the public health
protections against biological, chemical,
nuclear, and radiological agents. Among
other things, section 564 of the FD&C
Act allows FDA to authorize the use of
an unapproved medical product or an
unapproved use of an approved medical
product in certain situations. With this
EUA authority, FDA can help assure
that medical countermeasures may be
used in emergencies to diagnose, treat,
or prevent serious or life-threatening
diseases or conditions caused by
biological, chemical, nuclear, or
radiological agents when there are no
adequate, approved, and available
alternatives.
Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act
provides that, before an EUA may be
issued, the Secretary of HHS must
declare that circumstances exist
justifying the authorization based on
one of the following grounds: (1) A
determination by the Secretary of
Homeland Security that there is a
domestic emergency, or a significant
potential for a domestic emergency,
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23722-23723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09374]
[[Page 23722]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2014-E-2329]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; LUZU
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for LUZU and is publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by June
21, 2016. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with
due diligence during the regulatory review period by October 19, 2016.
See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more
information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2014-E-2329, For Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; LUZU. Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION''. The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of USPTO may award
(for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product LUZU
(luliconazole). LUZU is indicated for topical treatment of interdigital
tinea pedis, tinea cruris, and tinea corporis caused by the organisms
Tricophyton
[[Page 23723]]
rubrum and Epidermophyton floccosum in patients 18 years of age and
older. Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for LUZU (U.S. Patent No. 5,900,488) from Nihon
Nohyaku Co., Ltd., and the USPTO requested FDA's assistance in
determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated May 11, 2015, FDA advised the USPTO that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval
of LUZU represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of
the product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that FDA determine the
product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
LUZU is 2,242 days. Of this time, 1,903 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 339 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became
effective: September 27, 2007. FDA has verified the Nihon Nohyaku Co.,
Ltd. claim that September 27, 2007, is the date the investigational new
drug application (IND) became effective.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: December
11, 2012. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) for LUZU (NDA 204153) was initially submitted on
December 11, 2012.
3. The date the application was approved: November 14, 2013. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 204153 was approved on
November 14, 2013.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,289 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and ask for
a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: April 18, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-09374 Filed 4-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P