Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 5X Airplane; Use of Automatic Power Reserve (APR), an Automatic Takeoff Thrust Control System (ATTCS) for Go-Around Performance Credit, 23566-23570 [2016-09333]
Download as PDF
23566
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
guaranteed bond resulting in a Loss that
has not been fully reimbursed to SBA,
or SBA has not been fully reimbursed
for any Imminent Breach payments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Reinstatement of Principal’s
eligibility. At any time after a Principal
becomes ineligible for further bond
guarantees under paragraph (a) of this
section:
(1) A Prior Approval Surety may
recommend that such Principal’s
eligibility be reinstated, and OSG may
agree to reinstate the Principal if:
(i) The Surety has settled its claim
with the Principal, or any of its
Affiliates, for an amount that results in
no Loss to SBA or in no amount owed
for Imminent Breach payments, or OSG
finds good cause for reinstating the
Principal notwithstanding the Loss to
SBA or amount owed for Imminent
Breach payments; or
(ii) OSG and the Surety determine
that further bond guarantees are
appropriate after the Principal was
deemed ineligible for further SBA bond
guarantees under paragraph (a)(1), (2),
(3), (5) or (6) of this section.
(2) A PSB Surety may:
(i) Recommend that such Principal’s
eligibility be reinstated, and OSG may
agree to reinstate the Principal, if the
Surety has settled its claim with the
Principal, or any of its Affiliates, for an
amount that results in no Loss to SBA
or in no amount owed for Imminent
Breach payments, or OSG finds good
cause for reinstating the Principal
notwithstanding the Loss to SBA or
amount owed for Imminent Breach
payments; or
(ii) Reinstate a Principal’s eligibility
upon the Surety’s determination that
further bond guarantees are appropriate
after the Principal was deemed
ineligible for further SBA bond
guarantees under paragraph (a)(1), (2),
(3), (5) or (6) of this section.
(c) Underwriting after reinstatement.
A guarantee application submitted after
reinstatement of the Principal’s
eligibility is subject to a very stringent
underwriting review.
■ 5. Amend § 115.16 by revising
paragraphs (e)(1) and (f)(1) to read as
follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 115.16
Determination of Surety’s Loss.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Amounts actually paid by the
Surety for specialized services that are
provided under contract by an outside
consultant, which is not an Affiliate of
the Surety, provided that such services
are beyond the capability of the Surety’s
salaried claims staff, and amounts
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
actually paid by the Surety for travel
expenses of the Surety’s claims staff.
The cost of the consultant’s services and
the travel expenses of the Surety’s
claims staff must be reasonable and
necessary and must specifically concern
the investigation, adjustment,
negotiation, compromise, settlement of,
or resistance to a claim for Loss
resulting from the breach of the terms of
the bonded Contract. The cost allocation
method must be reasonable and must
comply with generally accepted
accounting principles; and
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) Any unallocated expenses, all
direct and indirect costs incurred by the
Surety’s salaried claims staff (except for
reasonable and necessary travel
expenses of such staff), or any clear
mark-up on expenses or any overhead of
the Surety, its attorney, or any other
consultant hired by the Surety or the
attorney;
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend § 115.18 by revising
paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 115.18 Refusal to issue further
guarantees; suspension and termination of
PSB status.
(a) * * *
(2) Regulatory violations, fraud. Acts
of wrongdoing such as fraud, material
misrepresentation, breach of the Prior
Approval or PSB Agreement, the
Surety’s failure to continue to comply
with the requirements set forth in
§ 115.11, or regulatory violations (as
defined in § 115.19(d) and (h)) also
constitute sufficient grounds for refusal
to issue further guarantees, or in the
case of a PSB Surety, termination of
preferred status.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Amend § 115.36 as follows:
■ a. Revise the section heading;
■ b. Remove the paragraph designation
and heading ‘‘(a) Indemnity
settlements.’’;
■ c. Remove paragraphs (b) and (c); and
■ d. Redesignate paragraphs (1), (2), and
(3), as (a), (b), and (c).
■
§ 115.36
*
*
§ 115.60
Indemnity settlements.
*
*
*
[Amended]
8. Amend § 115.60 as follows:
a. Amend paragraph (a)(1) by
removing ‘‘$2,000,000’’ and adding
‘‘$6,500,000’’ in its place; and
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
b. Remove paragraph (a)(5) and
redesignate paragraph (a)(6) as new
paragraph (a)(5).
■
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–09302 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2014–1078; Special
Conditions No. 25–616–SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 5X Airplane; Use of
Automatic Power Reserve (APR), an
Automatic Takeoff Thrust Control
System (ATTCS) for Go-Around
Performance Credit
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Dassault Aviation
(Dassault) Model Falcon 5X airplane.
This airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature associated with
go-around performance credit when
using an automatic takeoff thrustcontrol system. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Dassault Aviation on April 22, 2016. We
must receive your comments by June 6,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2014–1078
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.
gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Parker, FAA, Propulsion and
Mechanical Systems Branch, ANM–112,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1509; facsimile
425–227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
substance of these special conditions
has been subject to the public comment
process in several prior instances with
no substantive comments received. The
FAA therefore finds that good cause
exists for making these special
conditions effective upon publication in
the Federal Register.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On July 1, 2012, Dassault Aviation
applied for a type certificate for their
new Model Falcon 5X airplane. This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
airplane is a transport-category airplane
to be operated in private/corporate
transportation with a maximum of 19
passengers. The Model Falcon 5X
airplane incorporates a low, swept wing
and twin rear-fuselage-mounted Snecma
Silvercrest turbofan engines. The
fuselage is about 23 m long with a 26
m wingspan.
The current requirements of Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 25 are inadequate for addressing
approach climb using ATTCS. Part 25
appendix I limits the application of
performance credit for ATTCS to takeoff
only.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Dassault Aviation must show that the
Model Falcon 5X airplane meets the
applicable provisions of part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–136.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model Falcon 5X airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model Falcon 5X
airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Dassault Aviation Model Falcon
5X airplane will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
feature.
An automatic takeoff thrust-control
system (ATTCS), described as an
automatic power reserve (APR) system,
which is available at all times without
any additional action or input from the
pilot; and which the applicant proposes
would not only function during the goaround, in addition to the takeoff phase
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23567
of flight, but also allow the applicant to
take performance credit for the system’s
function during that phase.
Discussion
Dassault Aviation proposes to include
an APR system (a part 23 term; the part
25 term is ATTCS) in the Model Falcon
5X airplane. Dassault proposes to use
the APR system during go-around, and
is requesting approach climb
performance credit for the use of the
additional power APR up-trim provides.
The Model Falcon 5X powerplant
control system comprises a fullauthority digital electronic control
(FADEC) for the Snemca Silvercrest
engine. The engine FADEC system
includes APR system functions. The
proposed configuration, which is novel
or unusual, provides for APR activation
during takeoff and go-around flight
operations, requiring no additional
action from the pilot. The airplane
performance data will be based on the
availability of the up-trim power during
takeoff and approach climb.
The part 25 standards applicable to
the automatic advancement of reserve
power, known as ATTCS and contained
in § 25.904 and appendix I, specifically
restrict performance credit for ATTCS to
the takeoff phase of flight. At the time
these standards were issued, the FAA
considered including other phases of
flight, including go-around. Concerns
about flightcrew workload precluded
including those additional phases of
flight. As the preamble of Amendment
25–62 to part 25 states:
In regard to ATTCS credit for approach
climb and go-around maneuvers, current
regulations preclude a higher power for the
approach climb (Section 25.121(d)) than for
the landing climb (Section 25.119). The
workload required for the flightcrew to
monitor and select from multiple in-flight
power settings in the event of an engine
failure during a critical point in the
approach, landing, or go-around operations is
excessive. Therefore, the FAA does not agree
that the scope of the amendment should be
changed to include the use of ATTCS for
anything except the takeoff phase.
The ATTCS incorporated on the
Model Falcon 5X airplane allows the
pilot to use the same power-setting
procedure during a go-around regardless
of whether or not an engine fails.
Because the ATTCS is always active, it
will function automatically following an
engine failure, and will advance the
remaining engine to the APR power
level.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
23568
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
Falcon 5X airplane. Should Dassault
Aviation apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include
another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain
novel or unusual design feature on one
model of airplane. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, the FAA
has determined that prior public notice
and comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon
publication in the Federal Register. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 5X airplanes.
1. The Model Falcon 5X airplane must
comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
25.904 and appendix I to 14 CFR part
25 and the following requirements
pertaining to the go-around phase of
flight:
2. Definitions
a. Takeoff/go-around (TOGA):
Throttle lever in takeoff or go-around
position.
b. Automatic takeoff thrust control
system (ATTCS): The ATTCS in Model
Falcon 5X airplanes is defined as the
entire automatic system available during
takeoff and in go-around mode,
including all devices, both mechanical
and electrical, that sense engine failure,
transmit signals, actuate fuel controls or
power levers (or increase engine power
by other means on operating engines to
achieve scheduled thrust or power
increase), and furnish cockpit
information on system operation.
c. Critical time interval: The
definition of the critical time interval in
14 CFR appendix I 25.2(b) must be
expanded to include the following:
i. When conducting an approach for
landing using ATTCS, the critical time
interval is defined as follows:
1. The critical time interval begins at
a point on a 2.5 degree approach glide
path from which, assuming a
simultaneous engine and ATTCS
failure, the resulting approach climb
flight path intersects a flight path
originating at a later point on the same
approach path corresponding that
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
corresponds to the 14 CFR part 25 oneengine-inoperative approach climb
gradient. The period of time from the
point of simultaneous engine and
ATTCS failure to the intersection of
these flight paths must be no shorter
than the time interval used in evaluating
the critical time interval for takeoff
beginning from the point of
simultaneous engine and ATTCS failure
and ending upon reaching a height of
400 feet.
2. The critical time interval ends at
the point on a minimum performance,
all-engines-operating go-around flight
path from which, assuming a
simultaneous engine and ATTCS
failure, the resulting minimum
approach climb flight path intersects a
flight path corresponding to the 14 CFR
part 25 minimum one-engineinoperative approach climb gradient.
The all-engines-operating go-around
flight path and the 14 CFR part 25 oneengine-inoperative approach climb
gradient flight path originate from a
common point on a 2.5 degree approach
path. The period of time from the point
of simultaneous engine and ATTCS
failure to the intersection of these flight
paths must be no shorter than the time
interval used in evaluating the critical
time interval for the takeoff beginning
from the point of simultaneous engine
and ATTCS failure and ending upon
reaching a height of 400 feet.
ii. The critical time interval must be
determined at the altitude resulting in
the longest critical time interval for
which one-engine-inoperative approach
climb performance data are presented in
the airplane flight manual (AFM).
iii. The critical time interval is
illustrated in the following figure:
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
23569
the longest critical time interval for
which one-engine-inoperative approach
climb performance data are presented in
the AFM.
e. The ‘‘critical time interval AD’’ is
illustrated in Figure 1.
3. Performance and system reliability
requirements: The applicant must
comply with the performance and
ATTCS reliability requirements as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
ER22AP16.058
the point of simultaneous engine and
ATTCS failure, point D, to the
intersection of these flight paths, point
E, must be no shorter than the
corresponding time in Figure 2,
‘‘I25.2(b) time interval FG.’’
d. The critical time interval must be
determined at the altitude resulting in
ER22AP16.057
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The all-engines-operating go-around
flight path, and the 14 CFR part 25 oneengine-inoperative approach climb
gradient flight path (engine failed,
ATTCS operating path in Figure 1),
originate from a common point, point C,
on a 2.5-degree approach path. The
period of time, ‘‘time interval DE,’’ from
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
23570
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
a. An ATTCS failure or a combination
of failures in the ATTCS during the
critical time interval (Figure 2):
i. Must not prevent the insertion of
the maximum approved go-around
thrust or power, or must be shown to be
a remote event.
ii. Must not result in a significant loss
or reduction in thrust or power, or must
be shown to be an extremely improbable
event.
b. The concurrent existence of an
ATTCS failure and an engine failure
during the critical time interval must be
shown to be extremely improbable.
c. All applicable performance
requirements of 14 CFR part 25 must be
met with an engine failure occurring at
the most critical point during go-around
with the ATTCS functioning.
d. The probability analysis must
include consideration of ATTCS failure
occurring after the time at which the
flightcrew last verifies that the ATTCS
is in a condition to operate until the
beginning of the critical time interval.
e. The propulsive thrust obtained
from the operating engine after failure of
the critical engine during a go-around
used to show compliance with the oneengine-inoperative climb requirements
of § 25.121(d) may not be greater than
the lesser of:
i. The actual propulsive thrust
resulting from the initial setting of
power or thrust controls with the
ATTCS functioning; or
ii. 111% of the propulsive thrust
resulting from the initial setting of
power or thrust controls with the
ATTCS failing to reset thrust or power
and without any action by the
flightcrew to reset thrust or power.
4. Thrust setting
a. The initial go-around thrust setting
on each engine at the beginning of the
go-around phase may not be less than
any of the following:
i. That required to permit normal
operation of all safety-related systems
and equipment dependent upon engine
thrust or power lever position; or
ii. That shown to be free of hazardous
engine response characteristics and not
to result in any unsafe aircraft operating
or handling characteristics when thrust
or power is advanced from the initial
go-around position to the maximum
approved power setting.
b. For approval to use an ATTCS for
go-arounds, the thrust setting procedure
must be the same for go-arounds
initiated with all engines operating as
for go-arounds initiated with one engine
inoperative.
5. Powerplant controls
a. In addition to the requirements of
§ 25.1141, no single failure or
malfunction, or probable combination
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Apr 21, 2016
Jkt 238001
thereof, of the ATTCS, including
associated systems, may cause the
failure of any powerplant function
necessary for safety.
b. The ATTCS must be designed to:
i. Apply thrust or power on the
operating engine(s), following any oneengine failure during a go-around, to
achieve the maximum approved goaround thrust without exceeding the
engine operating limits;
ii. Permit manual decrease or increase
in thrust or power up to the maximum
go-around thrust approved for the
airplane under the existing conditions
through the use of the power lever. For
airplanes equipped with limiters that
automatically prevent the engine
operating limits from being exceeded
under existing ambient conditions,
other means may be used to increase the
thrust in the event of an ATTCS failure,
provided that the means:
1. Is located on or forward of the
power levers;
2. Is easily identified and operated
under all operating conditions by a
single action of either pilot with the
hand that is normally used to actuate
the power levers; and
3. Meets the requirements of
§ 25.777(a), (b), and (c).
iii. Provide a means to verify to the
flightcrew before beginning an approach
for landing that the ATTCS is in a
condition to operate (unless it can be
demonstrated that an ATTCS failure
combined with an engine failure during
an entire flight is extremely
improbable); and
iv. Provide a means for the flightcrew
to deactivate the automatic function.
This means must be designed to prevent
inadvertent deactivation.
6. Powerplant instruments: In
addition to the requirements of
§ 25.1305:
a. A means must be provided to
indicate when the ATTCS is in the
armed or ready condition; and
b. If the inherent flight characteristics
of the airplane do not provide adequate
warning that an engine has failed, a
warning system that is independent of
the ATTCS must be provided to give the
pilot a clear warning of any engine
failure during a go-around.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8,
2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–09333 Filed 4–21–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2015–7301; Special
Conditions No. 25–614–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Model GVII–
G500 Airplanes, Pilot Compartment
View Requirements With an Enhanced
Flight Vision System
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation (Gulfstream) Model GVII–
G500 airplane. This airplane will have
a novel or unusual design feature when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. This design feature is an
enhanced flight vision system (EFVS)
that includes a head-up display (HUD)
capable of displaying forward-looking
infrared (FLIR) imagery, intended to be
used for instrument approaches under
provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 91.175(l) and (m).
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation on
April 22, 2016. We must receive your
comments by June 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2015–7301
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23566-23570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09333]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2014-1078; Special Conditions No. 25-616-SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 5X Airplane;
Use of Automatic Power Reserve (APR), an Automatic Takeoff Thrust
Control System (ATTCS) for Go-Around Performance Credit
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Dassault Aviation
(Dassault) Model Falcon 5X airplane. This airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature associated with go-around performance credit
when using an automatic takeoff thrust-control system. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on Dassault Aviation on April 22,
2016. We must receive your comments by June 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2014-1078
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
[[Page 23567]]
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/ gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Parker, FAA, Propulsion and
Mechanical Systems Branch, ANM-112, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1509; facsimile 425-227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The substance of these special conditions
has been subject to the public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments received. The FAA therefore
finds that good cause exists for making these special conditions
effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.
Background
On July 1, 2012, Dassault Aviation applied for a type certificate
for their new Model Falcon 5X airplane. This airplane is a transport-
category airplane to be operated in private/corporate transportation
with a maximum of 19 passengers. The Model Falcon 5X airplane
incorporates a low, swept wing and twin rear-fuselage-mounted Snecma
Silvercrest turbofan engines. The fuselage is about 23 m long with a 26
m wingspan.
The current requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 25 are inadequate for addressing approach climb using
ATTCS. Part 25 appendix I limits the application of performance credit
for ATTCS to takeoff only.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Dassault Aviation must show
that the Model Falcon 5X airplane meets the applicable provisions of
part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-136.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model Falcon 5X airplane because
of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model Falcon 5X airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise-
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 5X airplane will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design feature.
An automatic takeoff thrust-control system (ATTCS), described as an
automatic power reserve (APR) system, which is available at all times
without any additional action or input from the pilot; and which the
applicant proposes would not only function during the go-around, in
addition to the takeoff phase of flight, but also allow the applicant
to take performance credit for the system's function during that phase.
Discussion
Dassault Aviation proposes to include an APR system (a part 23
term; the part 25 term is ATTCS) in the Model Falcon 5X airplane.
Dassault proposes to use the APR system during go-around, and is
requesting approach climb performance credit for the use of the
additional power APR up-trim provides.
The Model Falcon 5X powerplant control system comprises a full-
authority digital electronic control (FADEC) for the Snemca Silvercrest
engine. The engine FADEC system includes APR system functions. The
proposed configuration, which is novel or unusual, provides for APR
activation during takeoff and go-around flight operations, requiring no
additional action from the pilot. The airplane performance data will be
based on the availability of the up-trim power during takeoff and
approach climb.
The part 25 standards applicable to the automatic advancement of
reserve power, known as ATTCS and contained in Sec. 25.904 and
appendix I, specifically restrict performance credit for ATTCS to the
takeoff phase of flight. At the time these standards were issued, the
FAA considered including other phases of flight, including go-around.
Concerns about flightcrew workload precluded including those additional
phases of flight. As the preamble of Amendment 25-62 to part 25 states:
In regard to ATTCS credit for approach climb and go-around
maneuvers, current regulations preclude a higher power for the
approach climb (Section 25.121(d)) than for the landing climb
(Section 25.119). The workload required for the flightcrew to
monitor and select from multiple in-flight power settings in the
event of an engine failure during a critical point in the approach,
landing, or go-around operations is excessive. Therefore, the FAA
does not agree that the scope of the amendment should be changed to
include the use of ATTCS for anything except the takeoff phase.
The ATTCS incorporated on the Model Falcon 5X airplane allows the
pilot to use the same power-setting procedure during a go-around
regardless of whether or not an engine fails. Because the ATTCS is
always active, it will function automatically following an engine
failure, and will advance the remaining engine to the APR power level.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
[[Page 23568]]
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Model Falcon 5X airplane. Should Dassault Aviation apply at a later
date for a change to the type certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, the FAA has determined
that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable,
and good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon
publication in the Federal Register. The FAA is requesting comments to
allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 5X
airplanes.
1. The Model Falcon 5X airplane must comply with the requirements
of 14 CFR 25.904 and appendix I to 14 CFR part 25 and the following
requirements pertaining to the go-around phase of flight:
2. Definitions
a. Takeoff/go-around (TOGA): Throttle lever in takeoff or go-around
position.
b. Automatic takeoff thrust control system (ATTCS): The ATTCS in
Model Falcon 5X airplanes is defined as the entire automatic system
available during takeoff and in go-around mode, including all devices,
both mechanical and electrical, that sense engine failure, transmit
signals, actuate fuel controls or power levers (or increase engine
power by other means on operating engines to achieve scheduled thrust
or power increase), and furnish cockpit information on system
operation.
c. Critical time interval: The definition of the critical time
interval in 14 CFR appendix I 25.2(b) must be expanded to include the
following:
i. When conducting an approach for landing using ATTCS, the
critical time interval is defined as follows:
1. The critical time interval begins at a point on a 2.5 degree
approach glide path from which, assuming a simultaneous engine and
ATTCS failure, the resulting approach climb flight path intersects a
flight path originating at a later point on the same approach path
corresponding that corresponds to the 14 CFR part 25 one-engine-
inoperative approach climb gradient. The period of time from the point
of simultaneous engine and ATTCS failure to the intersection of these
flight paths must be no shorter than the time interval used in
evaluating the critical time interval for takeoff beginning from the
point of simultaneous engine and ATTCS failure and ending upon reaching
a height of 400 feet.
2. The critical time interval ends at the point on a minimum
performance, all-engines-operating go-around flight path from which,
assuming a simultaneous engine and ATTCS failure, the resulting minimum
approach climb flight path intersects a flight path corresponding to
the 14 CFR part 25 minimum one-engine-inoperative approach climb
gradient. The all-engines-operating go-around flight path and the 14
CFR part 25 one-engine-inoperative approach climb gradient flight path
originate from a common point on a 2.5 degree approach path. The period
of time from the point of simultaneous engine and ATTCS failure to the
intersection of these flight paths must be no shorter than the time
interval used in evaluating the critical time interval for the takeoff
beginning from the point of simultaneous engine and ATTCS failure and
ending upon reaching a height of 400 feet.
ii. The critical time interval must be determined at the altitude
resulting in the longest critical time interval for which one-engine-
inoperative approach climb performance data are presented in the
airplane flight manual (AFM).
iii. The critical time interval is illustrated in the following
figure:
[[Page 23569]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR22AP16.057
The all-engines-operating go-around flight path, and the 14 CFR
part 25 one-engine-inoperative approach climb gradient flight path
(engine failed, ATTCS operating path in Figure 1), originate from a
common point, point C, on a 2.5-degree approach path. The period of
time, ``time interval DE,'' from the point of simultaneous engine and
ATTCS failure, point D, to the intersection of these flight paths,
point E, must be no shorter than the corresponding time in Figure 2,
``I25.2(b) time interval FG.''
d. The critical time interval must be determined at the altitude
resulting in the longest critical time interval for which one-engine-
inoperative approach climb performance data are presented in the AFM.
e. The ``critical time interval AD'' is illustrated in Figure 1.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR22AP16.058
3. Performance and system reliability requirements: The applicant
must comply with the performance and ATTCS reliability requirements as
follows:
[[Page 23570]]
a. An ATTCS failure or a combination of failures in the ATTCS
during the critical time interval (Figure 2):
i. Must not prevent the insertion of the maximum approved go-around
thrust or power, or must be shown to be a remote event.
ii. Must not result in a significant loss or reduction in thrust or
power, or must be shown to be an extremely improbable event.
b. The concurrent existence of an ATTCS failure and an engine
failure during the critical time interval must be shown to be extremely
improbable.
c. All applicable performance requirements of 14 CFR part 25 must
be met with an engine failure occurring at the most critical point
during go-around with the ATTCS functioning.
d. The probability analysis must include consideration of ATTCS
failure occurring after the time at which the flightcrew last verifies
that the ATTCS is in a condition to operate until the beginning of the
critical time interval.
e. The propulsive thrust obtained from the operating engine after
failure of the critical engine during a go-around used to show
compliance with the one-engine-inoperative climb requirements of Sec.
25.121(d) may not be greater than the lesser of:
i. The actual propulsive thrust resulting from the initial setting
of power or thrust controls with the ATTCS functioning; or
ii. 111% of the propulsive thrust resulting from the initial
setting of power or thrust controls with the ATTCS failing to reset
thrust or power and without any action by the flightcrew to reset
thrust or power.
4. Thrust setting
a. The initial go-around thrust setting on each engine at the
beginning of the go-around phase may not be less than any of the
following:
i. That required to permit normal operation of all safety-related
systems and equipment dependent upon engine thrust or power lever
position; or
ii. That shown to be free of hazardous engine response
characteristics and not to result in any unsafe aircraft operating or
handling characteristics when thrust or power is advanced from the
initial go-around position to the maximum approved power setting.
b. For approval to use an ATTCS for go-arounds, the thrust setting
procedure must be the same for go-arounds initiated with all engines
operating as for go-arounds initiated with one engine inoperative.
5. Powerplant controls
a. In addition to the requirements of Sec. 25.1141, no single
failure or malfunction, or probable combination thereof, of the ATTCS,
including associated systems, may cause the failure of any powerplant
function necessary for safety.
b. The ATTCS must be designed to:
i. Apply thrust or power on the operating engine(s), following any
one-engine failure during a go-around, to achieve the maximum approved
go-around thrust without exceeding the engine operating limits;
ii. Permit manual decrease or increase in thrust or power up to the
maximum go-around thrust approved for the airplane under the existing
conditions through the use of the power lever. For airplanes equipped
with limiters that automatically prevent the engine operating limits
from being exceeded under existing ambient conditions, other means may
be used to increase the thrust in the event of an ATTCS failure,
provided that the means:
1. Is located on or forward of the power levers;
2. Is easily identified and operated under all operating conditions
by a single action of either pilot with the hand that is normally used
to actuate the power levers; and
3. Meets the requirements of Sec. 25.777(a), (b), and (c).
iii. Provide a means to verify to the flightcrew before beginning
an approach for landing that the ATTCS is in a condition to operate
(unless it can be demonstrated that an ATTCS failure combined with an
engine failure during an entire flight is extremely improbable); and
iv. Provide a means for the flightcrew to deactivate the automatic
function. This means must be designed to prevent inadvertent
deactivation.
6. Powerplant instruments: In addition to the requirements of Sec.
25.1305:
a. A means must be provided to indicate when the ATTCS is in the
armed or ready condition; and
b. If the inherent flight characteristics of the airplane do not
provide adequate warning that an engine has failed, a warning system
that is independent of the ATTCS must be provided to give the pilot a
clear warning of any engine failure during a go-around.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-09333 Filed 4-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P