Intent To Conduct Scoping and Prepare a Draft Environmental Assessment for Changes in Regulations for Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries, 23445-23447 [2016-09248]
Download as PDF
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
submitted information is validated as
PCII, the entire submission is given
protection as PCII. Additionally,
metadata practices are not streamlined
so that it is received in a uniform
process. This ANPRM seeks comments
regarding the marking of PCII as it
relates to the Controlled Unclassified
Information (CUI) framework, to include
comments on portion marking of
original PCII, and the marking of PCII
metadata.
c. Sharing PCII with Foreign
Governments—To date the PCII Program
does not share PCII with foreign
governments, however it is possible to
do so through sharing agreements. This
ANPRM seeks comments regarding the
sharing of PCII with trusted
international partners identified through
sharing agreements to support the
critical infrastructure protection and
resilience efforts of the United States
and partner governments.
d. Regulatory Purposes—Comments
on whether the current information in 6
CFR part 29 is sufficient to describe the
restriction on regulatory access to PCII.
See sections 29.2(k) and 29.3 of 6 CFR
part 29.
e. Safeguarding—Comments on all
aspects of PCII safeguarding, including
comments on storage, violations of
unauthorized disclosure, dissemination,
tracking and use of PCII, and
destruction of same.
f. Oversight and Compliance—
Currently, oversight and compliance
within the PCII Program ensures that all
critical infrastructure activities are in
accordance with the CII Act of 2002 and
6 CFR part 29. This ANPRM seeks
comments relating to broadening the
oversight and compliance of the PCII
Program to enhance assessment and
measure the effectiveness of compliance
with PCII Program policies, procedures
and practices.
g. Alignment with other information
protection programs—Comments
regarding how DHS may be able to
better align the PCII Program with other
existing information protection and
sharing programs, such as the
Transportation Security
Administration’s Sensitive Security
Information program, the Department of
Homeland Security’s ChemicalTerrorism Vulnerability Information
program, and the National Archives and
Records Administration Controlled
Unclassified Information Program,
including comments on any duplication
or overlap that may exist between the
PCII Program and another information
protection programs. When providing
comments on this topic, DHS
encourages commenters to provide the
specific citations to any information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:26 Apr 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
protection programs that may duplicate
or overlap with the PCII requirements as
well as a specific description of the
duplicative or overlapping requirement.
h. Administration of PCII Program in
States—Comments on streamlining the
administration of the PCII Program
within State, local, tribal, and territorial
entities by including State, local, tribal,
and territorial Homeland Security
Advisors in the management of the PCII
Program so that states are accredited in
their entirety and aligned with the
requirements of the PCII Program.
In each of the above cases, DHS also
requests that the commenter provide, in
as much detail as possible, an
explanation why the procedures should
be modified, streamlined, expanded, or
removed, as well as specific suggestions
of the ways DHS can better achieve its
protective objectives for sharing
information about the nation’s critical
infrastructure.
In addressing these topics, DHS
encourages interested parties to provide
specific data that documents the
potential costs of modifying the existing
regulatory requirements pursuant to the
commenter’s suggestions; the potential
quantifiable benefits including security
and societal benefits of modifying the
existing procedures; and the potential
impacts on small businesses of
modifying the existing regulatory
requirements. Commenters might also
address how DHS can best obtain and
consider accurate, objective information
and data about the costs, burdens, and
benefits of the PCII Program and
whether there are lower cost alternatives
that would allow DHS to continue to
achieve its goal of protecting sensitive
security information on the nation’s
critical infrastructure consistent with
the CII Act of 2002.
Jeh Charles Johnson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–09186 Filed 4–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23445
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
RIN 0648–BF99
Intent To Conduct Scoping and
Prepare a Draft Environmental
Assessment for Changes in
Regulations for Greater Farallones and
Cordell Bank National Marine
Sanctuaries
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of intent to conduct
scoping, hold public scoping meetings,
and prepare an environmental
assessment.
AGENCY:
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
expanded the boundaries of Gulf of the
Farallones National Marine Sanctuary
(now renamed Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary or GFNMS)
and Cordell Bank National Marine
Sanctuary (CBNMS) to an area north
and west of their previous boundaries
with a final rule published on March 12,
2015. The final rule entered into effect
on June 9, 2015. Pursuant to a request
from USCG, NOAA is considering
developing future rulemaking to allow
the following USCG discharges within
part or all of GFNMS and CBNMS: 1.
Untreated vessel sewage, 2. vessel
graywater that does not meet the
definition of clean as defined by the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(FWPCA), and 3. ammunition and
pyrotechnics (flare) materials used in
USCG training exercises for use of force
and search and rescue. NOAA will
conduct public scoping meetings to
gather information and other comments
to determine the relevant scope of issues
and range of alternatives to be addressed
in the environmental process from
individuals, organizations, tribes, and
government agencies on this topic. The
scoping meetings are scheduled as
detailed below.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before May 31, 2016.
Scoping meetings will be held on:
1. May 10, 2016, 6 p.m.
2. May 11, 2016, 6 p.m.
3. May 12, 2016, 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NOS–2016–0043, by any of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21APP1.SGM
21APP1
23446
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA–NOS–2016–
0043, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Maria Brown, Superintendent,
Greater Farallones National Marine
Sanctuary, 991 Marine Drive, The
Presidio, San Francisco, CA 94129.
• In Person: At any of the following
scoping meetings:
1. San Francisco Bay Area—U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Bay Model
Visitor Center, 2100 Bridgeway, Blvd.,
Sausalito, CA 94965 (May 10, 2016).
2. Bodega Bay Fire Protection District,
510 Highway One, Bodega Bay, CA
94923(May 11, 2016).
3. Gualala Community Center, 47950
Center Street, Gualala, CA 95445 (May
12, 2016).
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NOAA. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NOAA will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Brown, Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary
Superintendent, at Maria.Brown@
noaa.gov or 415–561–6622.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
NOAA is charged with managing
marine protected areas as the National
Marine Sanctuary System (16 U.S.C.
1431 (b)(1)). The Office of National
Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) is the
federal office within NOAA that
manages the National Marine Sanctuary
System. The mission of ONMS is to
identify, protect, conserve, and enhance
the natural and cultural resources,
values, and qualities of the National
Marine Sanctuary System for this and
future generations throughout the
nation. ONMS serves as the trustee for
15 marine protected areas, among them
GFNMS and CBNMS. GFNMS was
designated in 1981 and protects
approximately 3,295 square miles (2,488
square nautical miles). CBNMS was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:26 Apr 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
designated in 1989 and protects
approximately 1,286 square miles (971
square nautical miles). The final rule
entered into effect on June 9, 2015(80
FR 34047).
At that time, NOAA postponed the
effectiveness of the discharge
requirements in both sanctuaries’
regulations with regard to U.S. Coast
Guard activities for six months. An
additional six month postponement of
the effectiveness of the discharge
requirements was published in the
Federal Register on December 1, 2015,
to provide adequate time for completion
of an environmental assessment and to
determine NOAA’s next steps. Without
further NOAA action, the discharge
regulations would become effective with
regard to USCG activities June 9, 2016.
Both sanctuaries’ regulations prohibit
discharging or depositing, from within
or into the sanctuary, any material or
other matter (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2–3) and
15 CFR 922.112(a)(2)(i–ii)). Several
other national marine sanctuaries also
have these regulatory prohibitions. The
discharge prohibitions are aimed at
maintaining and improving water
quality within national marine
sanctuaries to enhance conditions for
the living marine resources within the
sanctuaries. The discharge regulations
have exemptions; those relevant for the
proposed action include:
—For a vessel less than 300 gross
registered tons (GRT), or a vessel 300
GRT or greater without sufficient
holding tank capacity to hold sewage
while within the sanctuary, clean
effluent generated incidental to vessel
use by an operable Type I or II marine
sanitation device that is approved in
accordance with section 312 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
as amended (FWPCA); marine
sanitation devices must be locked in
a manner that prevents discharge or
deposit of untreated sewage
(§ 922.82(a)(2)(ii) and
§ 922.112(a)(2)(i)(B));
—for a vessel less than 300 GRT, or a
vessel 300 GRT or greater without
sufficient holding tank capacity to
hold graywater while within the
sanctuary, clean graywater as defined
by section 312 of the FWPCA
(§ 922.82(a)(2)(iv) and
§ 922.112(a)(2)(i)(D)); and
—activities necessary to respond to an
emergency threatening life, property
or the environment (§ 922.82(c) and
§ 922.112(b)).
The USCG, part of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, is a
military service and a branch of the
armed forces (14 U.S.C. 1), charged with
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
carrying out eleven maritime safety,
security and stewardship missions.
One key mission of the USCG is to
enforce or assist in the enforcement of
all applicable Federal laws on, under,
and over the high seas and waters
subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States. As part of this mission, the
USCG supports resource protection
efforts within GFNMS and CBNMS by
providing surveillance of activities
within the sanctuaries and enforcement
of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA) and other laws. The USCG has
authority to enforce the NMSA under 14
U.S.C. 2 and 14 U.S.C. 89. Law
enforcement activities for the two
sanctuaries are also conducted by other
agencies, primarily NOAA’s Office of
Law Enforcement and the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife. In
GFNMS the National Park Service and
several local agencies also conduct law
enforcement activities.
The USCG also leads incident
planning and response activities for oil
spills and other incidents in U.S. coastal
and ocean waters. These activities are
necessary components of GFNMS and
CBNMS management. Other USCG
missions that support national marine
sanctuary management include ports,
waterways and coastal security; aids to
navigation, including tending buoys;
search and rescue; living marine
resources; marine safety; and marine
environmental protection. The USCG
may concurrently conduct activities to
support more than one of its missions
when operating vessels within or
aircraft above GFNMS and CBNMS.
In the course of the rulemaking to
expand GFNMS and CBNMS, NOAA
received a letter dated February 4, 2013,
from the USCG stating that the sewage
and graywater discharge prohibitions
proposed for the GFNMS and CBNMS
expansion areas had the potential to
impair the ability of USCG vessels to
conduct operational missions in the
proposed enlarged sanctuaries and to
stay ‘‘mission ready’’. In 2014, USCG
and NOAA re-initiated discussions to
try to address all types of discharges
from the training activities and the
sewage and graywater discharges from
other missions and routine patrols in
both GFNMS and CBNMS.
Subsequently, NOAA and the USCG
entered into interagency consultations
in January 2015 to address both
agencies’ concerns. NOAA published
the final rule for the expansion of
GFNMS and CBNMS on March 12, 2015
(80 FR 13078), in the Federal Register
and the rule became effective on June 9,
2015 (80 FR 34047).
At issue are the discharge regulations
in both sanctuaries and USCG
E:\FR\FM\21APP1.SGM
21APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
compliance with these regulations
during routine vessel operations and
during training exercises designed to
make USCG personnel ready for search
and rescue missions and use of force
missions using live fire exercises.
NOAA is concerned with protecting
sanctuary resources and habitats,
resolving any conflicts that could occur
among sanctuary user groups (e.g.,
fishing and USCG live fire training), and
ensuring continued USCG enforcement
of sanctuary regulations.
To ensure the rule did not impair
USCG operations necessary to fulfill its
multi-purpose missions while the
agencies were in consultation, the
document postponed for six months the
effective date for the discharge
requirements in the expansion areas for
both sanctuaries with regard to USCG
activities. NOAA committed to
considering exempting certain USCG
discharge activities from the GFNMS
and CBNMS regulations. An additional
six month postponement of the
effectiveness of the discharge
requirements was published in the
Federal Register December 1, 2015, to
provide adequate time for completion of
an environmental assessment and to
determine NOAA’s action. Without
further NOAA action, the discharge
regulations would become effective with
regard to USCG activities on June 9,
2016.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Potential Options
NOAA is exploring a variety of
options on how to best protect sanctuary
resources while ensuring the
operational capacity for USCG to
conduct mission-essential activities.
NOAA has identified two options for
this: 1. Changing the regulations to
allow USCG discharges; and 2. issuing
a national marine sanctuary general
permit, if the activity is eligible for a
permit and is conducted in accordance
with the terms and conditions in the
permit (see https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/
management/permits/). In either case,
discharges could be allowed in all
waters of the sanctuaries; only in
Federal waters (further than 3 nautical
miles from shore); in certain zones
delineated based on biological factors
(such as oceanographic features or
density of significant species) and other
factors (such as high use for recreation,
shipping, or other human activities); in
the expanded waters of CBNMS and
GFNMS based on the March 12, 2015
rulemaking; or not at all. NOAA is
interested in receiving public comment
on the best way to address the need for
continued USCG operations in CBNMS
and GFNMS while fulfilling its primary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:26 Apr 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
objective of resource protection in
national marine sanctuaries.
Request for Information
NOAA anticipates that these changes,
whether regulatory or non-regulatory
will require preparation of an
environmental assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Therefore, NOAA is also
interested in receiving public comment
that could contribute to the
environmental analysis that will be
prepared for this action; specifically,
information related to the potential
impacts of Coast Guard operational
vessel discharges of sewage and
graywater and training discharges
within GFNMS and CBNMS on
biological, physical and oceanographic
features of the sanctuaries as well as on
human activities taking place in the
sanctuaries.
Timeline
The process for this action is
composed of four major stages:
1. Information collection and
characterization (scoping); 2.
preparation and release of a draft
environmental assessment under NEPA,
and any proposed amendments to the
regulations if appropriate; 3. public
review and comment; 4. preparation and
release of a final environmental
assessment, and any final amendments
to the regulations if appropriate. This
document also advises the public that
NOAA will coordinate any consultation
responsibilities under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA),
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) under the
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MSA), section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA, 16 U.S.C. 470),
and Federal Consistency review under
the Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA), along with its ongoing NEPA
process including the use of NEPA
documents and public and stakeholder
meetings to also meet the requirements
of other federal laws.
In fulfilling its responsibility under
the NHPA and NEPA, NOAA intends to
identify consulting parties; identify
historic properties and assess the effects
of the undertaking on such properties;
initiate formal consultation with the
State Historic Preservation Officer, the
Advisory Council of Historic
Preservation, and other consulting
parties as appropriate; involve the
public in accordance with NOAA’s
NEPA procedures, and develop in
consultation with identified consulting
parties alternatives and proposed
measures that might avoid, minimize or
mitigate any adverse effects on historic
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23447
properties as appropriate and describe
them in any environmental assessment
or draft environmental impact
statement.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
Dated: April 15, 2016.
John Armor,
Acting Director for the Office of National
Marine Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2016–09248 Filed 4–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0132; FRL–9945–08–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Louisiana; Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan; Fee Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Louisiana State
Implementation Plan (SIP) related to the
Fee Regulations section of the Louisiana
SIP that were submitted by the State of
Louisiana on February 23, 2016. The
EPA has evaluated the SIP submittal
from Louisiana and preliminarily
determined these revisions are
consistent with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). The EPA
is proposing this action under section
110 of the Act.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before May 23, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2016–0132, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. For
additional information on how to
submit comments see the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
the direct final rule located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracie Donaldson, 214–665–6633,
donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. To inspect
the hard copy materials, please schedule
an appointment with Tracie Donaldson
or Bill Deese at 214–665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, the EPA is approving the
State’s SIP submittal as a direct rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21APP1.SGM
21APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23445-23447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09248]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
RIN 0648-BF99
Intent To Conduct Scoping and Prepare a Draft Environmental
Assessment for Changes in Regulations for Greater Farallones and
Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries
AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of intent to conduct scoping, hold public scoping
meetings, and prepare an environmental assessment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
expanded the boundaries of Gulf of the Farallones National Marine
Sanctuary (now renamed Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary or
GFNMS) and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary (CBNMS) to an area
north and west of their previous boundaries with a final rule published
on March 12, 2015. The final rule entered into effect on June 9, 2015.
Pursuant to a request from USCG, NOAA is considering developing future
rulemaking to allow the following USCG discharges within part or all of
GFNMS and CBNMS: 1. Untreated vessel sewage, 2. vessel graywater that
does not meet the definition of clean as defined by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act (FWPCA), and 3. ammunition and pyrotechnics
(flare) materials used in USCG training exercises for use of force and
search and rescue. NOAA will conduct public scoping meetings to gather
information and other comments to determine the relevant scope of
issues and range of alternatives to be addressed in the environmental
process from individuals, organizations, tribes, and government
agencies on this topic. The scoping meetings are scheduled as detailed
below.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 31, 2016.
Scoping meetings will be held on:
1. May 10, 2016, 6 p.m.
2. May 11, 2016, 6 p.m.
3. May 12, 2016, 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NOS-2016-0043, by any of the following methods:
[[Page 23446]]
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-2016-0043, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Maria Brown, Superintendent, Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary, 991 Marine Drive, The Presidio, San
Francisco, CA 94129.
In Person: At any of the following scoping meetings:
1. San Francisco Bay Area--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bay Model
Visitor Center, 2100 Bridgeway, Blvd., Sausalito, CA 94965 (May 10,
2016).
2. Bodega Bay Fire Protection District, 510 Highway One, Bodega
Bay, CA 94923(May 11, 2016).
3. Gualala Community Center, 47950 Center Street, Gualala, CA 95445
(May 12, 2016).
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NOAA. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NOAA will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Brown, Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary Superintendent, at Maria.Brown@noaa.gov or
415-561-6622.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NOAA is charged with managing marine protected areas as the
National Marine Sanctuary System (16 U.S.C. 1431 (b)(1)). The Office of
National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) is the federal office within NOAA
that manages the National Marine Sanctuary System. The mission of ONMS
is to identify, protect, conserve, and enhance the natural and cultural
resources, values, and qualities of the National Marine Sanctuary
System for this and future generations throughout the nation. ONMS
serves as the trustee for 15 marine protected areas, among them GFNMS
and CBNMS. GFNMS was designated in 1981 and protects approximately
3,295 square miles (2,488 square nautical miles). CBNMS was designated
in 1989 and protects approximately 1,286 square miles (971 square
nautical miles). The final rule entered into effect on June 9, 2015(80
FR 34047).
At that time, NOAA postponed the effectiveness of the discharge
requirements in both sanctuaries' regulations with regard to U.S. Coast
Guard activities for six months. An additional six month postponement
of the effectiveness of the discharge requirements was published in the
Federal Register on December 1, 2015, to provide adequate time for
completion of an environmental assessment and to determine NOAA's next
steps. Without further NOAA action, the discharge regulations would
become effective with regard to USCG activities June 9, 2016.
Both sanctuaries' regulations prohibit discharging or depositing,
from within or into the sanctuary, any material or other matter (15 CFR
922.82(a)(2-3) and 15 CFR 922.112(a)(2)(i-ii)). Several other national
marine sanctuaries also have these regulatory prohibitions. The
discharge prohibitions are aimed at maintaining and improving water
quality within national marine sanctuaries to enhance conditions for
the living marine resources within the sanctuaries. The discharge
regulations have exemptions; those relevant for the proposed action
include:
--For a vessel less than 300 gross registered tons (GRT), or a vessel
300 GRT or greater without sufficient holding tank capacity to hold
sewage while within the sanctuary, clean effluent generated incidental
to vessel use by an operable Type I or II marine sanitation device that
is approved in accordance with section 312 of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (FWPCA); marine sanitation devices
must be locked in a manner that prevents discharge or deposit of
untreated sewage (Sec. 922.82(a)(2)(ii) and Sec.
922.112(a)(2)(i)(B));
--for a vessel less than 300 GRT, or a vessel 300 GRT or greater
without sufficient holding tank capacity to hold graywater while within
the sanctuary, clean graywater as defined by section 312 of the FWPCA
(Sec. 922.82(a)(2)(iv) and Sec. 922.112(a)(2)(i)(D)); and
--activities necessary to respond to an emergency threatening life,
property or the environment (Sec. 922.82(c) and Sec. 922.112(b)).
The USCG, part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is a
military service and a branch of the armed forces (14 U.S.C. 1),
charged with carrying out eleven maritime safety, security and
stewardship missions.
One key mission of the USCG is to enforce or assist in the
enforcement of all applicable Federal laws on, under, and over the high
seas and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. As
part of this mission, the USCG supports resource protection efforts
within GFNMS and CBNMS by providing surveillance of activities within
the sanctuaries and enforcement of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA) and other laws. The USCG has authority to enforce the NMSA under
14 U.S.C. 2 and 14 U.S.C. 89. Law enforcement activities for the two
sanctuaries are also conducted by other agencies, primarily NOAA's
Office of Law Enforcement and the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife. In GFNMS the National Park Service and several local agencies
also conduct law enforcement activities.
The USCG also leads incident planning and response activities for
oil spills and other incidents in U.S. coastal and ocean waters. These
activities are necessary components of GFNMS and CBNMS management.
Other USCG missions that support national marine sanctuary management
include ports, waterways and coastal security; aids to navigation,
including tending buoys; search and rescue; living marine resources;
marine safety; and marine environmental protection. The USCG may
concurrently conduct activities to support more than one of its
missions when operating vessels within or aircraft above GFNMS and
CBNMS.
In the course of the rulemaking to expand GFNMS and CBNMS, NOAA
received a letter dated February 4, 2013, from the USCG stating that
the sewage and graywater discharge prohibitions proposed for the GFNMS
and CBNMS expansion areas had the potential to impair the ability of
USCG vessels to conduct operational missions in the proposed enlarged
sanctuaries and to stay ``mission ready''. In 2014, USCG and NOAA re-
initiated discussions to try to address all types of discharges from
the training activities and the sewage and graywater discharges from
other missions and routine patrols in both GFNMS and CBNMS.
Subsequently, NOAA and the USCG entered into interagency consultations
in January 2015 to address both agencies' concerns. NOAA published the
final rule for the expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS on March 12, 2015 (80
FR 13078), in the Federal Register and the rule became effective on
June 9, 2015 (80 FR 34047).
At issue are the discharge regulations in both sanctuaries and USCG
[[Page 23447]]
compliance with these regulations during routine vessel operations and
during training exercises designed to make USCG personnel ready for
search and rescue missions and use of force missions using live fire
exercises. NOAA is concerned with protecting sanctuary resources and
habitats, resolving any conflicts that could occur among sanctuary user
groups (e.g., fishing and USCG live fire training), and ensuring
continued USCG enforcement of sanctuary regulations.
To ensure the rule did not impair USCG operations necessary to
fulfill its multi-purpose missions while the agencies were in
consultation, the document postponed for six months the effective date
for the discharge requirements in the expansion areas for both
sanctuaries with regard to USCG activities. NOAA committed to
considering exempting certain USCG discharge activities from the GFNMS
and CBNMS regulations. An additional six month postponement of the
effectiveness of the discharge requirements was published in the
Federal Register December 1, 2015, to provide adequate time for
completion of an environmental assessment and to determine NOAA's
action. Without further NOAA action, the discharge regulations would
become effective with regard to USCG activities on June 9, 2016.
Potential Options
NOAA is exploring a variety of options on how to best protect
sanctuary resources while ensuring the operational capacity for USCG to
conduct mission-essential activities. NOAA has identified two options
for this: 1. Changing the regulations to allow USCG discharges; and 2.
issuing a national marine sanctuary general permit, if the activity is
eligible for a permit and is conducted in accordance with the terms and
conditions in the permit (see https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/management/permits/). In either case, discharges could be allowed in all waters of
the sanctuaries; only in Federal waters (further than 3 nautical miles
from shore); in certain zones delineated based on biological factors
(such as oceanographic features or density of significant species) and
other factors (such as high use for recreation, shipping, or other
human activities); in the expanded waters of CBNMS and GFNMS based on
the March 12, 2015 rulemaking; or not at all. NOAA is interested in
receiving public comment on the best way to address the need for
continued USCG operations in CBNMS and GFNMS while fulfilling its
primary objective of resource protection in national marine
sanctuaries.
Request for Information
NOAA anticipates that these changes, whether regulatory or non-
regulatory will require preparation of an environmental assessment
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Therefore, NOAA is
also interested in receiving public comment that could contribute to
the environmental analysis that will be prepared for this action;
specifically, information related to the potential impacts of Coast
Guard operational vessel discharges of sewage and graywater and
training discharges within GFNMS and CBNMS on biological, physical and
oceanographic features of the sanctuaries as well as on human
activities taking place in the sanctuaries.
Timeline
The process for this action is composed of four major stages: 1.
Information collection and characterization (scoping); 2. preparation
and release of a draft environmental assessment under NEPA, and any
proposed amendments to the regulations if appropriate; 3. public review
and comment; 4. preparation and release of a final environmental
assessment, and any final amendments to the regulations if appropriate.
This document also advises the public that NOAA will coordinate any
consultation responsibilities under section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA), Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) under the Magnuson Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA, 16 U.S.C. 470), and Federal
Consistency review under the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), along
with its ongoing NEPA process including the use of NEPA documents and
public and stakeholder meetings to also meet the requirements of other
federal laws.
In fulfilling its responsibility under the NHPA and NEPA, NOAA
intends to identify consulting parties; identify historic properties
and assess the effects of the undertaking on such properties; initiate
formal consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer, the
Advisory Council of Historic Preservation, and other consulting parties
as appropriate; involve the public in accordance with NOAA's NEPA
procedures, and develop in consultation with identified consulting
parties alternatives and proposed measures that might avoid, minimize
or mitigate any adverse effects on historic properties as appropriate
and describe them in any environmental assessment or draft
environmental impact statement.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
Dated: April 15, 2016.
John Armor,
Acting Director for the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2016-09248 Filed 4-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P