Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits, 23274-23276 [2016-09168]
Download as PDF
23274
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Notices
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Exporter
Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co.,
Ltd ...........................................
70.55
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this
review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).14
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review.
For customers or importers of Xugong
and Qihang for which we do not have
entered value, we calculated importer(or customer-) specific antidumping
duty assessment amounts based on the
ratio of the total amount of dumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
of subject merchandise to the total sales
quantity of those same sales.15 For
customers or importers of Xugong and
Qihang for which we received enteredvalue information, we have calculated
importer- (or customer-) specific
antidumping duty assessment rates
based on importer- (or customer-)
specific ad valorem rates.16 For the nonexamined separate rate companies, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate all
appropriate entries at 70.55 percent. For
the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate all appropriate entries
at 105.31 percent.
Pursuant to a refinement in the
Department’s non-market economy
(‘‘NME’’) practice, for entries that were
not reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by companies individually
examined during this review, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the NME-wide
rate.17 In addition, if the Department
determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the NME-wide rate.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14 See
Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103
(February 14, 2012) (‘‘NME Antidumping
Proceedings’’).
15 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
16 Id.
17 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Apr 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For the exporters listed above, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
identified in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section
of this notice, above; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters that are not under review
in this segment of the proceeding but
that received a separate rate in a
previous segment, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the exporter-specific
rate (or exporter-producer chain rate)
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which the exporter was reviewed; (3) for
all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 105.31 percent; and (4) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping and/
or countervailing duties occurred and
the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b). We are issuing and
publishing the final results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 12, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Issues and Decision Memorandum
• Summary
• Background
• Scope of the Order
• List of Comments
• Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Application of Adverse
Facts Available Is Warranted With Regards
to Certain Xugong Sales
Comment 2: Whether To Grant Qihang a
Double Remedies Adjustment and What
Pass-Through Rate to Use
Comment 3: Whether To Adjust Xugong’s
U.S. Prices for Irrecoverable VAT
Comment 4: Treatment of Xugong’s Market
Economy Purchases
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should
Apply the Separate Rate Calculated in This
Review to TWS Xingtai
Comment 6: Whether the Department Should
Reject Certain Surrogate Values Submitted
After the Preliminary Results
Comment 7: Surrogate Country
Comment 8: Financial Statements
Comment 9: Natural Rubber
Comment 10: Reclaimed Rubber
Comment 11: Inland Freight
Comment 12: Selection Surrogate Value for
Carbon Black
Comment 13: Inadvertent Errors in Surrogate
Value Selection
Comment 14: Selection of the Surrogate
Values for #3 and #20 Compound Rubber,
Activation Rubber Powder, Benzonic Acid,
and Tire Cord Fabric
• Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–09165 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE574
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Notices
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has
made a preliminary determination that
an Exempted Fishing Permit application
contains all of the required information
and warrants further consideration. This
Exempted Fishing Permit would allow
eight commercial fishing vessels to fish
outside of the limited access sea scallop
regulations in support of bycatch
reduction research by using a bidirectional extended link apron.
Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of
this notification to provide interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed Exempted
Fishing Permits.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by any of the following
methods:
• Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line ‘‘DA16–026
CFF Eco Friendly Dredge EFP.’’
• Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope ’’
DA16–026 CFF Eco Friendly Dredge
EFP.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannah Jaburek, Fisheries Management
Specialist, 978–282–8456.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coonamesset Farm Foundation (CFF)
has submitted a proposal titled
‘‘Development of Ecosystem Friendly
Scallop Dredge Bags: Tools for LongTerm Sustainability,’’ that has been
favorably reviewed and is pending final
approval by NOAA’s Grants
SUMMARY:
Management Division under the 2016
Atlantic Sea Scallop Research Set-Aside
(RSA) Program.
CFF submitted a complete application
for an Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP)
on March 10, 2016. The project would
continue testing gear that reduces
bycatch focusing on a bi-directional
extended link apron which increases
inter-ring spacing to improve
escapement of small scallops and
reduction in finfish bycatch.
CFF is requesting exemptions that
would allow eight commercial fishing
vessels be exempt from the Atlantic sea
scallop days-at-sea (DAS) allocations at
50 CFR 648.53(b); crew size restrictions
at § 648.51(c); Atlantic sea scallop
observer program requirements at
§ 648.11(g); access area program
requirements at § 648.60(a)(4), and
rotational closed area exemptions for
Closed Area I at § 648.58(a); Closed Area
II at § 648.58(b), and Nantucket
Lightship at § 648.58(c). The EFP would
exempt participating vessels from
possession limits and minimum size
requirements specified in 50 CFR part
648, subsections B and D through O, for
sampling purposes only. The EFP would
also exempt one vessel from the scallop
dredge gear restrictions for minimum
ring and mesh size and use of a liner at
§ 648.51(b) in order to use a survey
dredge set to the same specifications the
NMFS uses for its yearly abundance
survey. Any fishing activity conducted
outside the scope of the exempted
fishing activity would be prohibited.
Eight vessels would conduct scallop
dredging in June 2016-May 2017, on a
total of seven 7-day trips, for a total of
49 DAS. Each trip would complete
approximately 50 tows for an overall
total of 350 tows for the project. Trips
would take place in the open areas of
Southern New England and Georges
Bank as well as in the Mid-Atlantic
scallop access area and Georges Bank
access areas that are currently closed.
23275
Four trips would be conducted in the
Mid-Atlantic and southern New
England, and three trips would be
conducted on Georges Bank. Trips
would be centralized around areas with
high yellowtail and winter flounder
bycatch and in areas with a high
abundance of harvestable size scallops
mixed with pre-recruit scallops.
Six trips would fish two 15-foot (4.57m) Turtle Deflector Dredges, towed for
a maximum duration of 30 minutes with
a tow speed range of 4.8–5.1 knots. One
dredge would be rigged with a standard
linked bag while the other would be
rigged with a bi-directional extended
link apron. Standard linking is defined
as a single link between ring spaces, and
the extended link is defined as two links
linked together between rings. Both
dredges would use 4-inch (10.16-cm)
rings and a 10-inch (25.40-cm) twine
top. One trip would utilize the NMFS
survey dredge on one side, which has
specifications of 8-feet (2.44 m) wide
with 2-inch (5.08-cm) rings and a 3.5inch (8.89-cm) twine top with a 1.5-inch
(3.81-cm) liner inserted inside. The
project would use a combination of both
the experimental and control dredge on
the other side. This would allow the
project to compare the absolute
selectivity curves between the control
and experimental dredges.
For all tows, the sea scallop catch
would be counted into baskets and
weighed. One basket from each dredge
would be randomly selected and the
scallops would be measured in 5-mm
increments to determine size selectivity.
Finfish catch would be sorted by species
and then counted, weighed and
measured in 1-mm increments.
Depending on the volume of scallops
and finfish captured, the catch would be
subsampled as necessary. No catch
would be retained for longer than
needed to conduct sampling and no
catch would be landed for sale.
PROJECT CATCH ESTIMATES IN POUNDS
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Species
Scallops .....................................................................................................................
Yellowtail Flounder ....................................................................................................
Winter Flounder .........................................................................................................
Windowpane Flounder ...............................................................................................
Monkfish .....................................................................................................................
Summer Flounder ......................................................................................................
Barndoor Skate ..........................................................................................................
Northeast Skate Complex ..........................................................................................
CFF needs these exemptions to allow
them to conduct experimental dredge
towing without being charged DAS, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Apr 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
Weight
(pounds)
Number
250,000
2,000
300
5,000
2,500
100
500
75,000
to deploy gear in closed access areas
where concentrations of primary
bycatch species are sufficiently high to
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
100,000
2,000
500
3,500
5,500
150
500
100,000
Weight
(kilograms)
45,359
907
227
1,588
2,495
68
227
45,359
provide statistically robust results.
Exemption from the dredge gear
requirements would allow the project to
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
23276
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Notices
tow the NMFS survey dredge, which
does not conform with regulation.
Participating vessels need crew size
waivers to accommodate science
personnel, and possession waivers will
enable researchers to conduct finfish
sampling activities. The project would
be exempt from the sea scallop observer
program requirements because activities
conducted on the trip are not consistent
with normal fishing operations.
If approved, the applicant may
request minor modifications and
extensions to the EFP throughout the
year. EFP modifications and extensions
may be granted without further notice if
they are deemed essential to facilitate
completion of the proposed research
and have minimal impacts that do not
change the scope or impact of the
initially approved EFP request. Any
fishing activity conducted outside the
scope of the exempted fishing activity
would be prohibited.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 15, 2016.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–09168 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE485
Notice of Availability of a Draft
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment for Fisheries and
Ecosystem Research Conducted and
Funded by the National Marine
Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries
Science Center
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Draft
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the
availability of the ‘‘Draft Programmatic
Environmental Assessment (DPEA) for
Fisheries and Ecosystem Research
Conducted and Funded by the
Southeast Fisheries Science Center
(SEFSC).’’ Publication of this notice
begins the official public comment
period for this DPEA. The purpose of
the DPEA is to evaluate, in compliance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), the potential direct,
indirect, and cumulative impacts of
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:53 Apr 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
conducting and funding fisheries and
ecosystem research in the southeastern
coast of the U.S., the Gulf of Mexico,
and the Caribbean Sea marine waters of
Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than May 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the DPEA
should be addressed to: NOAA/NMFS/
SEFSC/Director’s Office, 75 Virginia
Beach Drive, Key Biscayne, FL 33149.
The mailbox address for providing
email comments is SEFSC.DPEA@
noaa.gov. NMFS is not responsible for
email comments sent to addresses other
than the one provided here. Comments
sent via email, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10megabyte file size. A copy of the DPEA
may be obtained by writing to the
address specified above, telephoning the
contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting the
internet at: https://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/
dpea.html
Documents cited in this notice may
also be viewed, by appointment, during
regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Melissa Cook, SEFSC, (228) 762–4591.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Southeast Fisheries Science Center
(SEFSC) is the research arm of National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in the
Southeast region of the U.S. The SEFSC
conducts research and provides
scientific advice to manage fisheries and
conserve protected species in marine
and estuarine habitats of the Atlantic
Ocean along the southeastern coast of
the U.S., the Gulf of Mexico, and the
Caribbean Sea, including marine waters
offshore from Puerto Rico and the U.S.
Virgin Islands. Three regional Fishery
Management Councils rely in part on
data collected by the SEFSC. The South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council
(SAFMC), the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (GMFMC), and the
Caribbean Fishery Management Council
(CFMC) rely primarily on the SEFSC for
fisheries independent research data for
development of stock assessment
reports and other management
purposes. The SEFSC also provides
research data and works cooperatively
with numerous other domestic and
international fisheries management
organizations.
NMFS has prepared the DPEA under
NEPA to evaluate several alternatives
for conducting and funding fisheries
and ecosystem research activities as the
primary Federal action. Additionally in
the DPEA, NMFS evaluates a related
action—also called a ‘‘connected
action’’ under 40 CFR 1508.25 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Council on Environmental Quality’s
regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)—which is the
proposed promulgation of regulations
and authorization of the take of marine
mammals incidental to the fisheries
research under the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). Additionally,
because the proposed research activities
occur in areas inhabited by species of
marine mammals, birds, sea turtles, and
fish listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) as threatened or
endangered, this DPEA evaluates
activities that could result in
unintentional takes of ESA-listed
marine species.
The following four alternatives are
currently evaluated in the DPEA:
• No-Action/Status Quo
Alternative—Conduct Federal Fisheries
and Ecosystem Research with Scope and
Protocols Similar to Past Effort
• Preferred Alternative—Conduct
Federal Fisheries and Ecosystem
Research (New Suite of Research) with
Mitigation for MMPA and ESA
Compliance
• Modified Research Alternative—
Conduct Federal Fisheries and
Ecosystem Research (New Suite of
Research) with Additional Mitigation
• No Research Alternative—No
Fieldwork for Federal Fisheries and
Ecosystem Research Conducted or
Funded by SEFSC
The first three alternatives include a
program of fisheries and ecosystem
research projects conducted or funded
by the SEFSC as the primary Federal
action. Because this primary action is
connected to a secondary Federal action
(also called a connected action under
NEPA), to consider authorizing
incidental take of marine mammals
under the MMPA, NMFS must identify
as part of this evaluation ‘‘(t)he means
of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on the species or stock and its
habitat.’’ (Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the
MMPA [16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.]). NMFS
must therefore identify and evaluate a
reasonable range of mitigation measures
to minimize impacts to protected
species that occur in SEFSC research
areas. These mitigation measures are
considered as part of the identified
alternatives in order to evaluate their
effectiveness to minimize potential
adverse environmental impacts. The
three action alternatives also include
mitigation measures intended to
minimize potentially adverse
interactions with other protected
species that occur within the action
area. Protected species include all
marine mammals, which are covered
under the MMPA, all species listed
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23274-23276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE574
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
[[Page 23275]]
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable
Fisheries, Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has made a preliminary
determination that an Exempted Fishing Permit application contains all
of the required information and warrants further consideration. This
Exempted Fishing Permit would allow eight commercial fishing vessels to
fish outside of the limited access sea scallop regulations in support
of bycatch reduction research by using a bi-directional extended link
apron.
Regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of this notification to provide
interested parties the opportunity to comment on applications for
proposed Exempted Fishing Permits.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments by any of the following
methods:
Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line
``DA16-026 CFF Eco Friendly Dredge EFP.''
Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope '' DA16-026 CFF
Eco Friendly Dredge EFP.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannah Jaburek, Fisheries Management
Specialist, 978-282-8456.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coonamesset Farm Foundation (CFF) has
submitted a proposal titled ``Development of Ecosystem Friendly Scallop
Dredge Bags: Tools for Long-Term Sustainability,'' that has been
favorably reviewed and is pending final approval by NOAA's Grants
Management Division under the 2016 Atlantic Sea Scallop Research Set-
Aside (RSA) Program.
CFF submitted a complete application for an Exempted Fishing Permit
(EFP) on March 10, 2016. The project would continue testing gear that
reduces bycatch focusing on a bi-directional extended link apron which
increases inter-ring spacing to improve escapement of small scallops
and reduction in finfish bycatch.
CFF is requesting exemptions that would allow eight commercial
fishing vessels be exempt from the Atlantic sea scallop days-at-sea
(DAS) allocations at 50 CFR 648.53(b); crew size restrictions at Sec.
648.51(c); Atlantic sea scallop observer program requirements at Sec.
648.11(g); access area program requirements at Sec. 648.60(a)(4), and
rotational closed area exemptions for Closed Area I at Sec. 648.58(a);
Closed Area II at Sec. 648.58(b), and Nantucket Lightship at Sec.
648.58(c). The EFP would exempt participating vessels from possession
limits and minimum size requirements specified in 50 CFR part 648,
subsections B and D through O, for sampling purposes only. The EFP
would also exempt one vessel from the scallop dredge gear restrictions
for minimum ring and mesh size and use of a liner at Sec. 648.51(b) in
order to use a survey dredge set to the same specifications the NMFS
uses for its yearly abundance survey. Any fishing activity conducted
outside the scope of the exempted fishing activity would be prohibited.
Eight vessels would conduct scallop dredging in June 2016-May 2017,
on a total of seven 7-day trips, for a total of 49 DAS. Each trip would
complete approximately 50 tows for an overall total of 350 tows for the
project. Trips would take place in the open areas of Southern New
England and Georges Bank as well as in the Mid-Atlantic scallop access
area and Georges Bank access areas that are currently closed. Four
trips would be conducted in the Mid-Atlantic and southern New England,
and three trips would be conducted on Georges Bank. Trips would be
centralized around areas with high yellowtail and winter flounder
bycatch and in areas with a high abundance of harvestable size scallops
mixed with pre-recruit scallops.
Six trips would fish two 15-foot (4.57-m) Turtle Deflector Dredges,
towed for a maximum duration of 30 minutes with a tow speed range of
4.8-5.1 knots. One dredge would be rigged with a standard linked bag
while the other would be rigged with a bi-directional extended link
apron. Standard linking is defined as a single link between ring
spaces, and the extended link is defined as two links linked together
between rings. Both dredges would use 4-inch (10.16-cm) rings and a 10-
inch (25.40-cm) twine top. One trip would utilize the NMFS survey
dredge on one side, which has specifications of 8-feet (2.44 m) wide
with 2-inch (5.08-cm) rings and a 3.5-inch (8.89-cm) twine top with a
1.5-inch (3.81-cm) liner inserted inside. The project would use a
combination of both the experimental and control dredge on the other
side. This would allow the project to compare the absolute selectivity
curves between the control and experimental dredges.
For all tows, the sea scallop catch would be counted into baskets
and weighed. One basket from each dredge would be randomly selected and
the scallops would be measured in 5-mm increments to determine size
selectivity. Finfish catch would be sorted by species and then counted,
weighed and measured in 1-mm increments. Depending on the volume of
scallops and finfish captured, the catch would be subsampled as
necessary. No catch would be retained for longer than needed to conduct
sampling and no catch would be landed for sale.
Project Catch Estimates in Pounds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight
Species Number Weight (pounds) (kilograms)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scallops............................................... 250,000 100,000 45,359
Yellowtail Flounder.................................... 2,000 2,000 907
Winter Flounder........................................ 300 500 227
Windowpane Flounder.................................... 5,000 3,500 1,588
Monkfish............................................... 2,500 5,500 2,495
Summer Flounder........................................ 100 150 68
Barndoor Skate......................................... 500 500 227
Northeast Skate Complex................................ 75,000 100,000 45,359
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFF needs these exemptions to allow them to conduct experimental
dredge towing without being charged DAS, and to deploy gear in closed
access areas where concentrations of primary bycatch species are
sufficiently high to provide statistically robust results. Exemption
from the dredge gear requirements would allow the project to
[[Page 23276]]
tow the NMFS survey dredge, which does not conform with regulation.
Participating vessels need crew size waivers to accommodate science
personnel, and possession waivers will enable researchers to conduct
finfish sampling activities. The project would be exempt from the sea
scallop observer program requirements because activities conducted on
the trip are not consistent with normal fishing operations.
If approved, the applicant may request minor modifications and
extensions to the EFP throughout the year. EFP modifications and
extensions may be granted without further notice if they are deemed
essential to facilitate completion of the proposed research and have
minimal impacts that do not change the scope or impact of the initially
approved EFP request. Any fishing activity conducted outside the scope
of the exempted fishing activity would be prohibited.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 15, 2016.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-09168 Filed 4-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P