Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 22981-22983 [2016-08979]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies Change in Bank Control Notices; Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies; Correction mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 13, 2016. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org: 1. Sunshine Financial, Inc., Tallahassee, Florida; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of voting shares of Sunshine Community Bank (Sunshine Savings Bank), Tallahassee, Florida, upon its conversion from a savings bank to a state chartered bank. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 14, 2016. Margaret McCloskey Shanks, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2016–08984 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2016–08204) published on page 21346 of the issue for Monday, April 11, 2016. Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for Jeffery F. Teague and Sarah Shell Teague, as cotrustees of the Jeffery F. Teague and Sarah Shell Teague Joint Revocable Trust, all of El Dorado, Arkansas; Susan Shell Allison, individually, and as trustee of the Susan Allison Testamentary Trust with power to vote shares owned by her two minor children, all of Benton, Arkansas; Joseph Shell, individually, and as trustee of the Joe Shell Testamentary Trust with power to vote shares owned by the Hanna Shell Irrevocable Trust, and by his minor child, all of Batesville, Arkansas; Jay Shell with power to vote shares held by Carolyn Southerland Shell Testamentary Trust and by High Point Farms, Jayme Shell, Jessica Shell, Mary K. Shell, all of Batesville, Arkansas; and John Allison, and Anna Allison, both of Benton, Arkansas, all as members of the Allison-Shell-Teague family control group, is revised to read as follows: 1. Jeffery F. Teague and Sarah Shell Teague, as co-trustees of the Jeffery F. Teague and Sarah Shell Teague Joint Revocable Trust, all of El Dorado, Arkansas; Susan Shell Allison, individually, and as trustee of the Susan Allison Testamentary Trust and with power to vote shares owned by her two minor children, all of Benton, Arkansas; Joseph Shell, individually, and as trustee of the Joe Shell Testamentary Trust and with power to vote shares owned by the Hanna Shell Irrevocable Trust, by the Hunter Shell Irrevocable Trust, and by his minor child, all of Batesville, Arkansas; Jay Shell with power to vote shares held by Carolyn Southerland Shell Testamentary Trust and by High Point Farms, Jayme Shell, Jessica Shell, Mary K. Shell, all of Batesville, Arkansas; and John Allison and Anna Allison, both of Benton, Arkansas; to acquire and retain voting shares of Citizens Bancshares of Batesville, and thereby indirectly acquire and retain voting shares of The Citizens Bank, both in Batesville, Arkansas. Comments on this application must be received by April 26, 2016. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22981 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 14, 2016. Margaret McCloskey Shanks, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2016–08981 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Title: Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration (CSPED) OMB No.: 0970–439. Description: The Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) within the Administration for Child and Families at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeks an extension without change for an existing data collection called the Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration (CSPED) through September 30, 2018 (OMB no. 0970– 439; expiration date September 30, 2016). Under CSPED, OCSE has issued grants to eight state child support agencies to provide employment, parenting, and child support services to parents who are having difficulty meeting their child support obligations. The overall objective of the CSPED evaluation is to document and evaluate the effectiveness of the approaches taken by these eight CSPED grantees. This evaluation will yield information about effective strategies for improving child support payments by providing non-custodial parents employment and other services through child support programs. It will generate extensive information on how these programs operated, what they cost, the effects the programs had, and whether the benefits of the programs exceed their costs. The information gathered will be critical to informing decisions related to future investments in child support-led employment-focused programs for noncustodial parents who have difficulty meeting their child support obligations. The CSPED evaluation consists of the following two interconnected components or ‘‘studies’’: 1. Implementation and Cost Study. The goal of the implementation and cost study is to provide a detailed description of the programs—how they are implemented, their participants, the contexts in which they are operated, their promising practices, and their costs. The detailed descriptions will E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM 19APN1 22982 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices assist in interpreting program impacts, identifying program features and conditions necessary for effective program replication or improvement, and carefully documenting the costs of delivering these services. Key data collection activities of the implementation and cost study include: (1) Conducting semi-structured interviews with program staff and selected community partner organizations to gather information on program implementation and costs; (2) conducting focus groups with program participants to elicit participation experiences; (3) administering a webbased survey to program staff and community partners to capture broader staff program experiences; and (4) collecting data on study participant service use, dosage, and duration of enrollment throughout the demonstration using a web-based Management Information System (MIS). Two of these collection activities will be completed before the requested extension period begins. They include the focus groups and the web-based survey of program staff and community partners. 2. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to provide rigorous estimates of the effectiveness of the eight programs using an experimental research design. Program applicants who are eligible for CSPED services are randomly assigned to either a program group that is offered program services or a control group. The study MIS that documents service use for the implementation study is also being used by grantee staff to conduct random assignment for the impact study. The impact study relies on data from surveys of participants, as well as administrative records from state and county data systems. Survey data are collected twice from program applicants. Baseline information is collected from all noncustodial parents who apply for the program prior to random assignment. A follow-up survey is collected from sample members twelve months after random assignment. A wide range of measures are collected through surveys, including measures of employment stability and quality, barriers to employment, parenting and coparenting, and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. In addition, data on child support obligations and payments, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, Medicaid receipt, involvement with the criminal justice system, and earnings and benefit data collected through the Unemployment Insurance (UI) system are obtained from state and county databases. Respondents: Respondents to these activities include study participants, grantee staff and community partners, as well as state and county staff responsible for extracting data from government databases for the evaluation. Specific respondents per instrument are noted in the burden table below. Annual Burden Estimates The following table provides the burden estimates for the implementation and cost study and the impact study components of the current request. The requested extension period is estimated to be two years and three months, from July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2018. Thus, burden hours for all components are annualized over two years and three months. IMPLEMENTATION AND COST STUDY Total number of respondents remaining Instrument Staff interview topic guide with program staff and community partners ............................................................................................... Study MIS for grantee and partner staff to track program participation ............................................................................................ Number of responses per respondent remaining Average burden hours per response remaining Estimated total burden hours remaining Total annual burden hours remaining 120 1 1 120 53 200 468.75 0.0333 3,125 1,390 Estimated total burden hours remaining Total annual burden hours remaining 180 175 583 180 256 1,107 80 78 259 80 114 492 IMPACT STUDY Total number of respondents remaining Instrument mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Introductory Script for Program Staff ............................................... Introductory Script for Program Participants ................................... Baseline Survey ............................................................................... Study MIS to Conduct Random Assignment ................................... Protocol for collecting administrative records .................................. 12-month follow-up survey ............................................................... Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,546. Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW., Washington DC 20201. Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 Number of responses per respondent remaining 120 1,050 1,000 120 32 1,476 9 1 1 9 1 1 requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. Email address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Average burden hours per response remaining .1667 .1667 .5833 .1667 8 0.75 having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email: OIRASUBSMISSION@OMB.EoP.GIV, Attn: Desk Officer for the E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM 19APN1 22983 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices effectiveness and improvement. This information is used as the primary method for monitoring the SHIP Projects. ACL estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: Respondents: 54 SHIP grantees at 18 hours per month (216 hours per year, per grantee). Total Estimated Burden Hours: 11,664 hours per year. Administration of Children and Families. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2016–08979 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Community Living Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) Client Contact Form, Public and Media Activity Report Form, and Resource Report Form Dated: April 12, 2016. Kathy Greenlee, Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Aging. [FR Doc. 2016–08958 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4154–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Community Living, HHS. ACTION: Notice. Office of the Secretary The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is announcing that the proposed collection of information listed below has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Submit written comments on the collection of information by June 20, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information by email to Phillip.Mckoy@acl.hhs.gov FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phillip Mckoy at 202.795.7397 or email: Phillip.Mckoy@acl.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, ACL has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Grantees are required by Congress to provide information for use in program monitoring and for Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) purposes. This information collection reports Client Contact Form, Public and Media Activity Report Form, and Resource Report Form, which have been used to collect data to evaluate program Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Public Comment Request AGENCY: SUMMARY: [Document Identifier: HHS–OS–0990–New– 60D] Office of the Secretary, HHS. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS), Department of Health and Human Services, announces plans to submit a new Information Collection Request (ICR), described below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Prior to submitting the ICR to OMB, OS seeks comments from the public regarding the burden estimate, below, or any other aspect of the ICR. DATES: Comments on the ICR must be received on or before June 20, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to Information.CollectionClearance@ hhs.gov or by calling (202) 690–6162. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information Collection Clearance staff, Information.CollectionClearance@ hhs.gov or (202) 690–6162. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When submitting comments or requesting information, please include the SUMMARY: document identifier HHS–OS–0990– New–60D for reference. Information Collection Request Title: Teen Pregnancy Prevention Tier 1B Design and Implementation Study Abstract: For the TPP Tier 1B Design and Implementation Study, we will document how each of the 50 grantees funded under this grant program are scaling-up efforts to strengthen and expand the reach of evidence-based TPP programs in their respective communities. OAH anticipates that grantees will employ diverse strategies in working within their communities to scale up their initiatives. Because this information collection will contribute to the emerging knowledge base about community-wide efforts to scale up evidence-based programs (EBPs), mobilize community support, and establish linkages to youth-friendly health services at the community level, it will be important to document the variety of grantee approaches and challenges they have encountered as a result of local conditions and strategies. To document these features and experiences, a lead staff member in each grantee organization will be interviewed by phone as well as up to two key grantee partners. Partners to be interviewed will be selected based on the prominence and variety of their roles within each initiative in order to provide multiple perspectives on implementation. To obtain more detail on implementation than can be gathered in a telephone interview, site visits with up to 15 grantees will be conducted to collect data that will illustrate in detail a variety of approaches and strategies for scaling up to the community level evidence-based approaches to teen pregnancy prevention. Likely Respondents: Respondents for telephone interviews will include 50 TPP Tier 1B grantee project directors and 100 implementation partner project directors. Site visit interview participants will include 120 grantee and partner staff members, and 40 Community Advisory Group members. Eighty Youth Leadership Council members will be recruited to participate in 10 focus groups. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN—HOURS Type of respondent Form name Grantee director (telephone) ................................ Other grantee staff ............................................... Partner director (telephone) ................................. Other partner directors ......................................... Youth Leadership Council members .................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 Attachment Attachment Attachment Attachment Attachment PO 00000 Frm 00020 B A B A A Number of respondents ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Number responses per respondent 50 60 100 60 80 E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM Average burden per response (in hours) 1 1 1 1 1 19APN1 90/60 1 90/60 1 1 Total burden hours 75 60 150 60 80

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22981-22983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration 
(CSPED)
    OMB No.: 0970-439.
    Description: The Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) within 
the Administration for Child and Families at the U.S. Department of 
Health and Human Services seeks an extension without change for an 
existing data collection called the Child Support Noncustodial Parent 
Employment Demonstration (CSPED) through September 30, 2018 (OMB no. 
0970-439; expiration date September 30, 2016). Under CSPED, OCSE has 
issued grants to eight state child support agencies to provide 
employment, parenting, and child support services to parents who are 
having difficulty meeting their child support obligations. The overall 
objective of the CSPED evaluation is to document and evaluate the 
effectiveness of the approaches taken by these eight CSPED grantees. 
This evaluation will yield information about effective strategies for 
improving child support payments by providing non-custodial parents 
employment and other services through child support programs. It will 
generate extensive information on how these programs operated, what 
they cost, the effects the programs had, and whether the benefits of 
the programs exceed their costs. The information gathered will be 
critical to informing decisions related to future investments in child 
support-led employment-focused programs for non-custodial parents who 
have difficulty meeting their child support obligations.
    The CSPED evaluation consists of the following two interconnected 
components or ``studies'':
    1. Implementation and Cost Study. The goal of the implementation 
and cost study is to provide a detailed description of the programs--
how they are implemented, their participants, the contexts in which 
they are operated, their promising practices, and their costs. The 
detailed descriptions will

[[Page 22982]]

assist in interpreting program impacts, identifying program features 
and conditions necessary for effective program replication or 
improvement, and carefully documenting the costs of delivering these 
services. Key data collection activities of the implementation and cost 
study include: (1) Conducting semi-structured interviews with program 
staff and selected community partner organizations to gather 
information on program implementation and costs; (2) conducting focus 
groups with program participants to elicit participation experiences; 
(3) administering a web-based survey to program staff and community 
partners to capture broader staff program experiences; and (4) 
collecting data on study participant service use, dosage, and duration 
of enrollment throughout the demonstration using a web-based Management 
Information System (MIS). Two of these collection activities will be 
completed before the requested extension period begins. They include 
the focus groups and the web-based survey of program staff and 
community partners.
    2. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to provide 
rigorous estimates of the effectiveness of the eight programs using an 
experimental research design. Program applicants who are eligible for 
CSPED services are randomly assigned to either a program group that is 
offered program services or a control group. The study MIS that 
documents service use for the implementation study is also being used 
by grantee staff to conduct random assignment for the impact study. The 
impact study relies on data from surveys of participants, as well as 
administrative records from state and county data systems. Survey data 
are collected twice from program applicants. Baseline information is 
collected from all noncustodial parents who apply for the program prior 
to random assignment. A follow-up survey is collected from sample 
members twelve months after random assignment. A wide range of measures 
are collected through surveys, including measures of employment 
stability and quality, barriers to employment, parenting and co-
parenting, and demographic and socio-economic characteristics. In 
addition, data on child support obligations and payments, Temporary 
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Supplemental Nutrition 
Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, Medicaid receipt, involvement with 
the criminal justice system, and earnings and benefit data collected 
through the Unemployment Insurance (UI) system are obtained from state 
and county databases.
    Respondents: Respondents to these activities include study 
participants, grantee staff and community partners, as well as state 
and county staff responsible for extracting data from government 
databases for the evaluation. Specific respondents per instrument are 
noted in the burden table below.

Annual Burden Estimates

    The following table provides the burden estimates for the 
implementation and cost study and the impact study components of the 
current request. The requested extension period is estimated to be two 
years and three months, from July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2018. Thus, 
burden hours for all components are annualized over two years and three 
months.

                                          Implementation and Cost Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Average     Estimated      Total
                                            Total  number     Number of       burden       total        annual
                Instrument                       of         responses per   hours per      burden       burden
                                             respondents     respondent      response      hours        hours
                                              remaining       remaining     remaining    remaining    remaining
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff interview topic guide with program              120               1            1          120           53
 staff and community partners............
Study MIS for grantee and partner staff               200          468.75       0.0333        3,125        1,390
 to track program participation..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                  Impact Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Average     Estimated      Total
                                            Total  number     Number of       burden       total        annual
                Instrument                       of         responses per   hours per      burden       burden
                                             respondents     respondent      response      hours        hours
                                              remaining       remaining     remaining    remaining    remaining
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introductory Script for Program Staff....             120               9        .1667          180           80
Introductory Script for Program                     1,050               1        .1667          175           78
 Participants............................
Baseline Survey..........................           1,000               1        .5833          583          259
Study MIS to Conduct Random Assignment...             120               9        .1667          180           80
Protocol for collecting administrative                 32               1            8          256          114
 records.................................
12-month follow-up survey................           1,476               1         0.75        1,107          492
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,546.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW., 
Washington DC 20201. Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All requests 
should be identified by the title of the information collection. Email 
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email: 
OIRASUBSMISSION@OMB.EoP.GIV, Attn: Desk Officer for the

[[Page 22983]]

Administration of Children and Families.

Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-08979 Filed 4-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4184-01-P