Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 22981-22983 [2016-08979]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies;
Correction
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than May 13, 2016.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can
also be sent electronically to
Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:
1. Sunshine Financial, Inc.,
Tallahassee, Florida; to become a bank
holding company by acquiring 100
percent of voting shares of Sunshine
Community Bank (Sunshine Savings
Bank), Tallahassee, Florida, upon its
conversion from a savings bank to a
state chartered bank.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, April 14, 2016.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–08984 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc.
2016–08204) published on page 21346
of the issue for Monday, April 11, 2016.
Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis heading, the entry for Jeffery F.
Teague and Sarah Shell Teague, as cotrustees of the Jeffery F. Teague and
Sarah Shell Teague Joint Revocable
Trust, all of El Dorado, Arkansas; Susan
Shell Allison, individually, and as
trustee of the Susan Allison
Testamentary Trust with power to vote
shares owned by her two minor
children, all of Benton, Arkansas;
Joseph Shell, individually, and as
trustee of the Joe Shell Testamentary
Trust with power to vote shares owned
by the Hanna Shell Irrevocable Trust,
and by his minor child, all of Batesville,
Arkansas; Jay Shell with power to vote
shares held by Carolyn Southerland
Shell Testamentary Trust and by High
Point Farms, Jayme Shell, Jessica Shell,
Mary K. Shell, all of Batesville,
Arkansas; and John Allison, and Anna
Allison, both of Benton, Arkansas, all as
members of the Allison-Shell-Teague
family control group, is revised to read
as follows:
1. Jeffery F. Teague and Sarah Shell
Teague, as co-trustees of the Jeffery F.
Teague and Sarah Shell Teague Joint
Revocable Trust, all of El Dorado,
Arkansas; Susan Shell Allison,
individually, and as trustee of the Susan
Allison Testamentary Trust and with
power to vote shares owned by her two
minor children, all of Benton, Arkansas;
Joseph Shell, individually, and as
trustee of the Joe Shell Testamentary
Trust and with power to vote shares
owned by the Hanna Shell Irrevocable
Trust, by the Hunter Shell Irrevocable
Trust, and by his minor child, all of
Batesville, Arkansas; Jay Shell with
power to vote shares held by Carolyn
Southerland Shell Testamentary Trust
and by High Point Farms, Jayme Shell,
Jessica Shell, Mary K. Shell, all of
Batesville, Arkansas; and John Allison
and Anna Allison, both of Benton,
Arkansas; to acquire and retain voting
shares of Citizens Bancshares of
Batesville, and thereby indirectly
acquire and retain voting shares of The
Citizens Bank, both in Batesville,
Arkansas.
Comments on this application must
be received by April 26, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22981
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, April 14, 2016.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–08981 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Title: Child Support Noncustodial
Parent Employment Demonstration
(CSPED)
OMB No.: 0970–439.
Description: The Office of Child
Support Enforcement (OCSE) within the
Administration for Child and Families
at the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services seeks an extension
without change for an existing data
collection called the Child Support
Noncustodial Parent Employment
Demonstration (CSPED) through
September 30, 2018 (OMB no. 0970–
439; expiration date September 30,
2016). Under CSPED, OCSE has issued
grants to eight state child support
agencies to provide employment,
parenting, and child support services to
parents who are having difficulty
meeting their child support obligations.
The overall objective of the CSPED
evaluation is to document and evaluate
the effectiveness of the approaches
taken by these eight CSPED grantees.
This evaluation will yield information
about effective strategies for improving
child support payments by providing
non-custodial parents employment and
other services through child support
programs. It will generate extensive
information on how these programs
operated, what they cost, the effects the
programs had, and whether the benefits
of the programs exceed their costs. The
information gathered will be critical to
informing decisions related to future
investments in child support-led
employment-focused programs for noncustodial parents who have difficulty
meeting their child support obligations.
The CSPED evaluation consists of the
following two interconnected
components or ‘‘studies’’:
1. Implementation and Cost Study.
The goal of the implementation and cost
study is to provide a detailed
description of the programs—how they
are implemented, their participants, the
contexts in which they are operated,
their promising practices, and their
costs. The detailed descriptions will
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
22982
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices
assist in interpreting program impacts,
identifying program features and
conditions necessary for effective
program replication or improvement,
and carefully documenting the costs of
delivering these services. Key data
collection activities of the
implementation and cost study include:
(1) Conducting semi-structured
interviews with program staff and
selected community partner
organizations to gather information on
program implementation and costs; (2)
conducting focus groups with program
participants to elicit participation
experiences; (3) administering a webbased survey to program staff and
community partners to capture broader
staff program experiences; and (4)
collecting data on study participant
service use, dosage, and duration of
enrollment throughout the
demonstration using a web-based
Management Information System (MIS).
Two of these collection activities will be
completed before the requested
extension period begins. They include
the focus groups and the web-based
survey of program staff and community
partners.
2. Impact Study. The goal of the
impact study is to provide rigorous
estimates of the effectiveness of the
eight programs using an experimental
research design. Program applicants
who are eligible for CSPED services are
randomly assigned to either a program
group that is offered program services or
a control group. The study MIS that
documents service use for the
implementation study is also being used
by grantee staff to conduct random
assignment for the impact study. The
impact study relies on data from surveys
of participants, as well as administrative
records from state and county data
systems. Survey data are collected twice
from program applicants. Baseline
information is collected from all
noncustodial parents who apply for the
program prior to random assignment. A
follow-up survey is collected from
sample members twelve months after
random assignment. A wide range of
measures are collected through surveys,
including measures of employment
stability and quality, barriers to
employment, parenting and coparenting, and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. In addition,
data on child support obligations and
payments, Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families (TANF) and
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) benefits, Medicaid
receipt, involvement with the criminal
justice system, and earnings and benefit
data collected through the
Unemployment Insurance (UI) system
are obtained from state and county
databases.
Respondents: Respondents to these
activities include study participants,
grantee staff and community partners, as
well as state and county staff
responsible for extracting data from
government databases for the
evaluation. Specific respondents per
instrument are noted in the burden table
below.
Annual Burden Estimates
The following table provides the
burden estimates for the
implementation and cost study and the
impact study components of the current
request. The requested extension period
is estimated to be two years and three
months, from July 1, 2016 to September
30, 2018. Thus, burden hours for all
components are annualized over two
years and three months.
IMPLEMENTATION AND COST STUDY
Total
number of
respondents
remaining
Instrument
Staff interview topic guide with program staff and community partners ...............................................................................................
Study MIS for grantee and partner staff to track program participation ............................................................................................
Number of
responses per
respondent
remaining
Average
burden
hours per
response
remaining
Estimated
total burden
hours
remaining
Total annual
burden
hours
remaining
120
1
1
120
53
200
468.75
0.0333
3,125
1,390
Estimated
total burden
hours
remaining
Total annual
burden
hours
remaining
180
175
583
180
256
1,107
80
78
259
80
114
492
IMPACT STUDY
Total
number of
respondents
remaining
Instrument
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Introductory Script for Program Staff ...............................................
Introductory Script for Program Participants ...................................
Baseline Survey ...............................................................................
Study MIS to Conduct Random Assignment ...................................
Protocol for collecting administrative records ..................................
12-month follow-up survey ...............................................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,546.
Additional Information: Copies of the
proposed collection may be obtained by
writing to the Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330
C Street SW., Washington DC 20201.
Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Number of
responses per
respondent
remaining
120
1,050
1,000
120
32
1,476
9
1
1
9
1
1
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to
make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Average
burden
hours per
response
remaining
.1667
.1667
.5833
.1667
8
0.75
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. Written
comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Email:
OIRASUBSMISSION@OMB.EoP.GIV,
Attn: Desk Officer for the
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
22983
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2016 / Notices
effectiveness and improvement. This
information is used as the primary
method for monitoring the SHIP
Projects. ACL estimates the burden of
this collection of information as follows:
Respondents: 54 SHIP grantees at 18
hours per month (216 hours per year,
per grantee). Total Estimated Burden
Hours: 11,664 hours per year.
Administration of Children and
Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–08979 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; State
Health Insurance Assistance Program
(SHIP) Client Contact Form, Public and
Media Activity Report Form, and
Resource Report Form
Dated: April 12, 2016.
Kathy Greenlee,
Administrator and Assistant Secretary for
Aging.
[FR Doc. 2016–08958 Filed 4–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community
Living, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
Office of the Secretary
The Administration for
Community Living (ACL) is announcing
that the proposed collection of
information listed below has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments on the
collection of information by June 20,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the collection of information by
email to Phillip.Mckoy@acl.hhs.gov
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Phillip Mckoy at 202.795.7397 or email:
Phillip.Mckoy@acl.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, ACL
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Grantees are required by Congress to
provide information for use in program
monitoring and for Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
purposes. This information collection
reports Client Contact Form, Public and
Media Activity Report Form, and
Resource Report Form, which have been
used to collect data to evaluate program
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection; Public
Comment Request
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
[Document Identifier: HHS–OS–0990–New–
60D]
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In compliance with section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the
Secretary (OS), Department of Health
and Human Services, announces plans
to submit a new Information Collection
Request (ICR), described below, to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Prior to submitting the ICR to
OMB, OS seeks comments from the
public regarding the burden estimate,
below, or any other aspect of the ICR.
DATES: Comments on the ICR must be
received on or before June 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to
Information.CollectionClearance@
hhs.gov or by calling (202) 690–6162.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information Collection Clearance staff,
Information.CollectionClearance@
hhs.gov or (202) 690–6162.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When
submitting comments or requesting
information, please include the
SUMMARY:
document identifier HHS–OS–0990–
New–60D for reference.
Information Collection Request Title:
Teen Pregnancy Prevention Tier 1B
Design and Implementation Study
Abstract: For the TPP Tier 1B Design
and Implementation Study, we will
document how each of the 50 grantees
funded under this grant program are
scaling-up efforts to strengthen and
expand the reach of evidence-based TPP
programs in their respective
communities. OAH anticipates that
grantees will employ diverse strategies
in working within their communities to
scale up their initiatives. Because this
information collection will contribute to
the emerging knowledge base about
community-wide efforts to scale up
evidence-based programs (EBPs),
mobilize community support, and
establish linkages to youth-friendly
health services at the community level,
it will be important to document the
variety of grantee approaches and
challenges they have encountered as a
result of local conditions and strategies.
To document these features and
experiences, a lead staff member in each
grantee organization will be interviewed
by phone as well as up to two key
grantee partners. Partners to be
interviewed will be selected based on
the prominence and variety of their
roles within each initiative in order to
provide multiple perspectives on
implementation. To obtain more detail
on implementation than can be gathered
in a telephone interview, site visits with
up to 15 grantees will be conducted to
collect data that will illustrate in detail
a variety of approaches and strategies
for scaling up to the community level
evidence-based approaches to teen
pregnancy prevention.
Likely Respondents: Respondents for
telephone interviews will include 50
TPP Tier 1B grantee project directors
and 100 implementation partner project
directors. Site visit interview
participants will include 120 grantee
and partner staff members, and 40
Community Advisory Group members.
Eighty Youth Leadership Council
members will be recruited to participate
in 10 focus groups.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN—HOURS
Type of
respondent
Form
name
Grantee director (telephone) ................................
Other grantee staff ...............................................
Partner director (telephone) .................................
Other partner directors .........................................
Youth Leadership Council members ....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
PO 00000
Frm 00020
B
A
B
A
A
Number of
respondents
................
................
................
................
................
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number
responses
per
respondent
50
60
100
60
80
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
1
1
1
1
1
19APN1
90/60
1
90/60
1
1
Total burden
hours
75
60
150
60
80
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22981-22983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08979]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Title: Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration
(CSPED)
OMB No.: 0970-439.
Description: The Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) within
the Administration for Child and Families at the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services seeks an extension without change for an
existing data collection called the Child Support Noncustodial Parent
Employment Demonstration (CSPED) through September 30, 2018 (OMB no.
0970-439; expiration date September 30, 2016). Under CSPED, OCSE has
issued grants to eight state child support agencies to provide
employment, parenting, and child support services to parents who are
having difficulty meeting their child support obligations. The overall
objective of the CSPED evaluation is to document and evaluate the
effectiveness of the approaches taken by these eight CSPED grantees.
This evaluation will yield information about effective strategies for
improving child support payments by providing non-custodial parents
employment and other services through child support programs. It will
generate extensive information on how these programs operated, what
they cost, the effects the programs had, and whether the benefits of
the programs exceed their costs. The information gathered will be
critical to informing decisions related to future investments in child
support-led employment-focused programs for non-custodial parents who
have difficulty meeting their child support obligations.
The CSPED evaluation consists of the following two interconnected
components or ``studies'':
1. Implementation and Cost Study. The goal of the implementation
and cost study is to provide a detailed description of the programs--
how they are implemented, their participants, the contexts in which
they are operated, their promising practices, and their costs. The
detailed descriptions will
[[Page 22982]]
assist in interpreting program impacts, identifying program features
and conditions necessary for effective program replication or
improvement, and carefully documenting the costs of delivering these
services. Key data collection activities of the implementation and cost
study include: (1) Conducting semi-structured interviews with program
staff and selected community partner organizations to gather
information on program implementation and costs; (2) conducting focus
groups with program participants to elicit participation experiences;
(3) administering a web-based survey to program staff and community
partners to capture broader staff program experiences; and (4)
collecting data on study participant service use, dosage, and duration
of enrollment throughout the demonstration using a web-based Management
Information System (MIS). Two of these collection activities will be
completed before the requested extension period begins. They include
the focus groups and the web-based survey of program staff and
community partners.
2. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to provide
rigorous estimates of the effectiveness of the eight programs using an
experimental research design. Program applicants who are eligible for
CSPED services are randomly assigned to either a program group that is
offered program services or a control group. The study MIS that
documents service use for the implementation study is also being used
by grantee staff to conduct random assignment for the impact study. The
impact study relies on data from surveys of participants, as well as
administrative records from state and county data systems. Survey data
are collected twice from program applicants. Baseline information is
collected from all noncustodial parents who apply for the program prior
to random assignment. A follow-up survey is collected from sample
members twelve months after random assignment. A wide range of measures
are collected through surveys, including measures of employment
stability and quality, barriers to employment, parenting and co-
parenting, and demographic and socio-economic characteristics. In
addition, data on child support obligations and payments, Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, Medicaid receipt, involvement with
the criminal justice system, and earnings and benefit data collected
through the Unemployment Insurance (UI) system are obtained from state
and county databases.
Respondents: Respondents to these activities include study
participants, grantee staff and community partners, as well as state
and county staff responsible for extracting data from government
databases for the evaluation. Specific respondents per instrument are
noted in the burden table below.
Annual Burden Estimates
The following table provides the burden estimates for the
implementation and cost study and the impact study components of the
current request. The requested extension period is estimated to be two
years and three months, from July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2018. Thus,
burden hours for all components are annualized over two years and three
months.
Implementation and Cost Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Estimated Total
Total number Number of burden total annual
Instrument of responses per hours per burden burden
respondents respondent response hours hours
remaining remaining remaining remaining remaining
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff interview topic guide with program 120 1 1 120 53
staff and community partners............
Study MIS for grantee and partner staff 200 468.75 0.0333 3,125 1,390
to track program participation..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Estimated Total
Total number Number of burden total annual
Instrument of responses per hours per burden burden
respondents respondent response hours hours
remaining remaining remaining remaining remaining
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introductory Script for Program Staff.... 120 9 .1667 180 80
Introductory Script for Program 1,050 1 .1667 175 78
Participants............................
Baseline Survey.......................... 1,000 1 .5833 583 259
Study MIS to Conduct Random Assignment... 120 9 .1667 180 80
Protocol for collecting administrative 32 1 8 256 114
records.................................
12-month follow-up survey................ 1,476 1 0.75 1,107 492
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,546.
Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be
obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families,
Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW.,
Washington DC 20201. Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All requests
should be identified by the title of the information collection. Email
address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email:
OIRASUBSMISSION@OMB.EoP.GIV, Attn: Desk Officer for the
[[Page 22983]]
Administration of Children and Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-08979 Filed 4-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
