Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 22033-22037 [2016-08367]
Download as PDF
22033
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 72
Thursday, April 14, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–5589; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–252–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012–20–
07, for certain Airbus Model A318,
A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes.
AD 2012–20–07 currently requires
revising the airworthiness limitations
section (ALS) of the instructions for
continued airworthiness (ICA) to
incorporate new limitations for fuel tank
systems, and revising the maintenance
program to incorporate revised fuel
maintenance and inspection tasks. Since
we issued AD 2012–20–07, Airbus has
issued more restrictive maintenance
requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations. This proposed AD would
require revising the maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate
revised fuel airworthiness limitations.
We are proposing this AD to prevent the
potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in a
fuel tank explosion and consequent loss
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:22 Apr 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5589; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–5589; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–252–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 2, 2012, we issued AD
2012–20–07, Amendment 39–17213 (77
FR 63716, October 17, 2012) (‘‘AD
2012–20–07’’). AD 2012–20–07 requires
actions intended to address an unsafe
condition on all Model A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2012–20–07,
Airbus has issued A318/A319/A320/
A321 Airworthiness Limitations Section
(ALS) Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9,
2014, which contains more restrictive
maintenance requirements and/or
airworthiness limitations. The European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Union, has
issued EASA Airworthiness Directive
2014–0260, dated December 5, 2014
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition. The MCAI states:
Prompted by an accident . . ., the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) published
Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR)
88 [https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_
Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/EEFB3F94451
DC06286256C93004F5E07?OpenDocument&
Highlight=sfar 88], and the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA) published interim Policy
INT/POL/25/12. In response to these
regulations, Airbus conducted a design
review to develop Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations (FAL) for Airbus A320 family
aeroplanes.
The FAL were specified in Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 FAL document ref.
95A.1931/05 at issue 04 for A318/A319/
A320/A321 aeroplanes. This document was
approved by the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) and is now referenced in
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5 to
comply with EASA policy statement (EASA
D2005/CPRO).
Failure to comply with items as identified
in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5
could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA
AD 2011–0155R1 (https://ad.easa.europa.eu/
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
22034
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
blob/easa_ad_2011_0155_R1_
superseded.pdf/AD_2011-0155R1_1), which
is superseded [and which corresponds to
FAA AD 2012–20–07, Amendment 39–17213
(77 FR 63716, October 17, 2012)], and
requires implementation of the new or more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or
airworthiness limitations as specified in
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5 at
Rev.01.
*
*
*
*
*
The required action is revising the
maintenance or inspection program to
incorporate revised fuel airworthiness
limitations.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5589.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued A318/A319/A320/
A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9,
2014. The service information describes
fuel system airworthiness limitations.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD requires revisions
to certain operator maintenance
documents to include new actions (e.g.,
inspections) and/or Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCLs). Compliance with these
actions and/or CDCCLs is required by 14
CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have
been previously modified, altered, or
repaired in the areas addressed by this
proposed AD, the operator may not be
able to accomplish the actions described
in the revisions. In this situation, to
comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the
operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance
according to paragraph (n)(1) of this
proposed AD. The request should
include a description of changes to the
required inspections that will ensure the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:22 Apr 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
continued operational safety of the
airplane.
Notwithstanding any other
maintenance or operational
requirements, components that have
been identified as airworthy or installed
on the affected airplanes before
accomplishing the revision of the
airplane maintenance or inspection
program or before accomplishing the
revision of the Airworthiness Limitation
Section (ALS) of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness specified in
this proposed AD, do not need to be
reworked in accordance with the
CDCCLs. However, once the airplane
maintenance or inspection program or
ALS has been revised as required by this
proposed AD, future maintenance
actions on these components must be
done in accordance with the CDCCLs.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
The MCAI specifies that if there are
findings from the ALS inspection tasks,
corrective actions must be accomplished
in accordance with Airbus maintenance
documentation. However, this proposed
AD does not include that requirement.
Operators of U.S.-registered airplanes
are required by general airworthiness
and operational regulations to perform
maintenance using methods that are
acceptable to the FAA. We consider
those methods to be adequate to address
any corrective actions necessitated by
the findings of ALS inspections required
by this proposed AD.
Explanation of Proposed Compliance
Time
In most ADs, we adopt a compliance
time allowing a specified amount of
time after the AD’s effective date or as
specified by the MCAI, whichever is
later. In this case, however, the MCAI
compliance time has already expired.
We have determined that an appropriate
initial compliance time is 60 days for
revising the maintenance or inspection
program to incorporate the fuel
airworthiness limitations (e.g., life
limits, tasks, and CDCCLs, and
associated thresholds and intervals)
described in Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9,
2014. We find 60 days an appropriate
compliance time to revise the
maintenance or inspection program. The
initial compliance times for the tasks are
at the times specified in Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 01,
dated July 9, 2014, or within 60 days,
whichever is later. In developing the
compliance time for this action, we
considered the degree of urgency
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
associated with addressing the unsafe
condition. This difference has been
coordinated with the EASA.
Airworthiness Limitations Based on
Type Design
The FAA recently became aware of an
issue related to the applicability of ADs
that require incorporation of an ALS
revision into an operator’s maintenance
or inspection program.
Typically, when these types of ADs
are issued by civil aviation authorities
of other countries, they apply to all
airplanes covered under an identified
type certificate (TC). The corresponding
FAA AD typically retains applicability
to all of those airplanes.
In addition, U.S. operators must
operate their airplanes in an airworthy
condition, in accordance with 14 CFR
91.7(a). Included in this obligation is the
requirement to perform any
maintenance or inspections specified in
the ALS, and in accordance with the
ALS as specified in 14 CFR 43.16 and
91.403(c), unless an alternative has been
approved by the FAA.
When a type certificate is issued for
a type design, the specific ALS,
including revisions, is a part of that type
design, as specified in 14 CFR 21.31(c).
The sum effect of these operational
and maintenance requirements is an
obligation to comply with the ALS
defined in the type design referenced in
the manufacturer’s conformity
statement. This obligation may
introduce a conflict with an AD that
requires a specific ALS revision if new
airplanes are delivered with a later
revision as part of their type design.
To address this conflict, the FAA has
approved alternative methods of
compliance (AMOCs) that allow
operators to incorporate the most recent
ALS revision into their maintenance/
inspection programs, in lieu of the ALS
revision required by the AD. This
eliminates the conflict and enables the
operator to comply with both the AD
and the type design.
However, compliance with AMOCs is
normally optional, and we recently
became aware that some operators
choose to retain the AD-mandated ALS
revision in their fleet-wide
maintenance/inspection programs,
including those for new airplanes
delivered with later ALS revisions, to
help standardize the maintenance of the
fleet. To ensure that operators comply
with the applicable ALS revision for
newly delivered airplanes containing a
later revision than that specified in an
AD, we plan to limit the applicability of
ADs that mandate ALS revisions to
those airplanes that are subject to an
earlier revision of the ALS, either as part
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
of the type design or as mandated by an
earlier AD.
This proposed AD therefore applies to
the airplanes identified in paragraph (c)
of this proposed AD with an original
certificate of airworthiness or original
export certificate of airworthiness that
was issued on or before the date of
approval of the ALS revision identified
in this proposed AD. Operators of
airplanes with an original certificate of
airworthiness or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued after
that date must comply with the
airworthiness limitations specified as
part of the approved type design and
referenced on the type certificate data
sheet.
Record of Ex Parte Communication
In preparation of AD actions, it is the
practice of the FAA to obtain technical
information and information on the
operational and economic impact from
design approval holders and aircraft
operators. We discussed certain issues
related to this NPRM in a recent meeting
with Airlines for America (A4A).
Shortly after this NPRM is published,
we will post a summary of this meeting
in the rulemaking docket. For
information on locating the docket, see
‘‘Examining the AD Docket.’’
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 953 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The actions required by AD 2012–20–
07, and retained in this proposed AD
take about 4 work-hours per product, at
an average labor rate of $85 per workhour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the actions that are
required by AD 2012–20–07 is $340 per
product.
We also estimate that it would take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $81,005, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:22 Apr 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2012–20–07, Amendment 39–17213 (77
FR 63716, October 17, 2012), and
adding the following new AD:
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2016–5589;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–252–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 31,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2012–20–07,
Amendment 39–17213 (77 FR 63716, October
17, 2012) (‘‘AD 2012–20–07’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22035
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4)
of this AD, certificated in any category, with
an original certificate of airworthiness or
original export certificate of airworthiness
issued on or before July 19, 2014.
(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122
airplanes.
(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes.
(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –231,
–232, and –233 airplanes.
(4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05, Periodic inspections.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by Airbus issuing
more restrictive maintenance requirements
and/or airworthiness limitations. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Revision of the Airworthiness
Limitations Section (ALS) To Incorporate
Fuel Maintenance and Inspection Tasks,
With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2012–20–07, with no
changes. For Model A318–111 and –112
airplanes, and Model A319, A320, and A321
airplanes: Within 3 months after August 28,
2007 (the effective date of AD 2007–15–06
(72 FR 40222, July 24, 2007) (‘‘AD 2007–15–
06’’)), revise the ALS of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness to incorporate
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, dated
February 28, 2006, as defined in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 1,
dated December 19, 2005 (approved by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on
March 14, 2006), Section 1, ‘‘Maintenance/
Inspection Tasks;’’ or Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations,
Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 2, dated July 8,
2008 (approved by the EASA on December
19, 2008), Section 1, ‘‘Maintenance/
Inspection Tasks.’’ For all tasks identified in
Section 1 ‘‘Maintenance/Inspection Tasks,’’
of Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Document
95A.1931/05, Issue 1, dated December 19,
2005; or Issue 2, dated July 8, 2008; the
initial compliance times start from August
28, 2007 (the effective date of AD 2007–15–
06), and the repetitive inspections must be
accomplished thereafter at the intervals
specified in Section 1, ‘‘Maintenance/
Inspection Tasks,’’ of Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations,
Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 1, dated
December 19, 2005; or Issue 2, dated July 8,
2008.
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
22036
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Airbus
Operator Information Telex (OIT) SE
999.0076/06, dated June 20, 2006, provides
guidance on identifying the applicable
sections of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 Airplane Maintenance Manual for
accomplishing the tasks specified in Section
1 ‘‘Maintenance/Inspection Tasks,’’ of Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 1,
dated December 19, 2005; or Issue 2, dated
July 8, 2008.
(h) Retained Revision of the ALS to
Incorporate Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs), With No
Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (h) of AD 2012–20–07, with no
changes. For Airbus Model A318–111 and
–112 airplanes, and Model A319, A320, and
A321 airplanes: Within 12 months after
August 28, 2007 (the effective date of AD
2007–15–06), revise the ALS of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
ALS Part 5–Fuel Airworthiness Limitations,
dated February 28, 2006, as defined in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 1,
dated December 19, 2005 (approved by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on
March 14, 2006), Section 2, ‘‘Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations;’’ or
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Document
95A.1931/05, Issue 2, dated July 8, 2008
(approved by EASA on December 19, 2008),
Section 2, ‘‘Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations.’’
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Retained Requirement: No Alternative
Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or
CDCCLs, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (i)(1) of AD 2012–20–07, with no
changes.
Except as required by paragraph (l) of this
AD and except as provided by paragraph
(n)(1) of this AD: After accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, no alternative inspections,
inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be used.
(j) Retained Revision of the Maintenance
Program, With Specific Delegation Approval
Language in Paragraph (j)(4) of This AD
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (j) of AD 2012–20–07, with
specific delegation approval language in
paragraph (j)(4) of this AD. Within 6 months
after November 21, 2012 (the effective date of
AD 2012–20–07): Revise the maintenance
program to incorporate the new or revised
tasks, life limits, and CDCCLs specified in
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Document
95A.1931/05, Issue 4, dated August 26, 2010,
except as required in paragraph (j)(4) of this
AD. The initial compliance times and
intervals are stated in this ALS document,
except as required in paragraphs (j)(1)
through (j)(4) of this AD, or within 6 months
after November 21, 2012, whichever occurs
later. For certain tasks, the compliance times
depend on the pre-modification and post-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:22 Apr 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
modification status of the airplane.
Incorporating the requirements of this
paragraph terminates the corresponding
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this
AD only.
(1) For airplanes for which the first flight
occurred before August 28, 2007 (the
effective date of AD 2007–15–06), the first
accomplishment of Tasks 281800–01–1,
Functional Check of Tank Vapour Seal and
Vent Drain System; and 281800–02–1,
Detailed Inspection of Vapour Seal; must be
performed no later than 11 months after
November 21, 2012 (the effective date of AD
2012–20–07).
(2) The first accomplishment of Tasks
470000–01–1, Operational Check of Dual
Flapper Shutoff Valves (DFSOV), Dual
Flapper Check Valves and Nitrogen Enriched
Air (NEA) Line for Leaks; 470000–02–1,
Operational Check of Both Dual Flapper
Check Valves for Leaks; 470000–03–1,
Operational Check of Dual Flapper Check
Valves for Reverse Flow and NEA Line for
Leaks; 470000–04–1, Operational Check of
Dual Flapper Check Valves for Reverse Flow;
and 470000–05–1, Remove Air Separation
Module (ASM) and Return to Vendor for
Workshop Check; must be calculated, in
accordance with paragraph (j)(2)(i) or (j)(2)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) From the airplane first flight for
airplanes on which Airbus modification
38062 or 38195 has been embodied in
production.
(ii) From the in-service installation of the
fuel tank inerting system specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1001, Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1002, Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1003, Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1004, Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1006, or Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1007.
(3) Although Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations,
Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 4, dated
August 26, 2010, does not refer to Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1006 and Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1007, the tasks
apply as specified in paragraphs (j)(3)(i)
through (j)(3)(iv) of this AD.
(i) Tasks 470000–01–1, Operational Check
of DFSOV, Dual Flapper Check Valves and
NEA Line for Leaks; and 470000–02–1,
Operational Check of Both Dual Flapper
Check Valves for leaks; apply to airplanes
that have previously accomplished the
actions specified in Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–47–1007.
(ii) Task 470000–03–1, Operational Check
of Dual Flapper Check Valves for Reverse
Flow and NEA Line for Leaks, applies to
airplanes that have previously accomplished
the actions specified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–47–1006, and that have not
accomplished the actions specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1007.
(iii) Task 470000–04–1, Operational Check
of Dual Flapper Check Valves for Reverse
Flow, applies to airplanes in postmodification 38195 configuration and that
have not accomplished the actions specified
in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–47–1007.
(iv) Task 470000–05–1, Remove ASM and
return to Vendor for Workshop Check,
applies to airplanes that have previously
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accomplished the actions specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–47–1007, and are in
pre-modification 151529 configuration.
(4) Replace each ASM identified in table 1
to paragraph (j)(4) of this AD in accordance
with a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
EASA (or its delegated agent); or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). The compliance time for
the replacement is before the accumulation of
27,000 total flight hours (component time)—
i.e., the life limitation.
Note 2 to paragraph (j)(4) of this AD:
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Task 47–10–43–920–
001–A, Air Separation Module Replacement,
is an additional source of guidance for
accomplishment of the removal and
replacement of the ASM.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (j)(4) OF THIS
AD—ASM REPLACEMENT
Affected Airplane
configuration—
ASM
Part No.—
Post-modification 38062 .........
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–47–1002 ....................
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–47–1004 ....................
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–47–1007 ....................
Post-modification 152033 .......
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–47–1011 ....................
2060017–101
2060017–101
2060017–101
2060017–101
2060017–102
2060017–102
(k) Retained Requirement: No Alternative
Actions, Intervals, and/or CDCCLs, With No
Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (k) of AD 2012–20–07, with no
changes. Except as required by paragraph (l)
of this AD, after accomplishing the revisions
required by paragraph (j) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections),
intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used other
than those specified in Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 ALS Part 5–Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, dated February 28, 2006, as
defined in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Document
95A.1931/05, Issue 4, dated August 26, 2010,
unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs
are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (n)(1) of
this AD.
(l) New Requirement of This AD: Revise the
Maintenance or Inspection Program
Within 60 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, by incorporating the
fuel airworthiness limitations (e.g., life
limits, tasks, and CDCCLs, and associated
thresholds and intervals) described in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 01,
dated July 9, 2014. The initial compliance
times for the tasks are at the times specified
in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
5, Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Revision
01, dated July 9, 2014, or within 60 days after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later. Incorporating the requirements
of this paragraph terminates the requirements
of paragraphs (g) through (k) of this AD.
(m) New Requirement of This AD: No
Alternative Actions, Intervals, or CDCCLs
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions,
intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an
AMOC in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0260, dated
December 5, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–5589.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
14:22 Apr 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
31, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–08367 Filed 4–13–16; 8:45 am]
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(ii) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with for AD 2012–20–07, are
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–5590; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–018–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440), CL–600–
2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, &
702), CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705), CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series
900), and CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet
Series 1000) airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by reports of
undesirable changes in the Reference
Airspeed (RAS) Bug, occurring during
flight without pilot input. This
proposed AD would require replacing
the flight control computer (FCC). We
are proposing this AD to prevent
uncommanded pitch changes, which
could result in deviation from a safe
flight path.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22037
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
ˆ
400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5590; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Services Branch, ANE–
172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone 516–228–7301; fax
516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–5590; Directorate Identifier
2016–NM–018–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2016–02,
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22033-22037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08367]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 22033]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-5589; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-252-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012-20-
07, for certain Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes. AD 2012-20-07 currently requires revising the airworthiness
limitations section (ALS) of the instructions for continued
airworthiness (ICA) to incorporate new limitations for fuel tank
systems, and revising the maintenance program to incorporate revised
fuel maintenance and inspection tasks. Since we issued AD 2012-20-07,
Airbus has issued more restrictive maintenance requirements and/or
airworthiness limitations. This proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance or inspection program to incorporate revised fuel
airworthiness limitations. We are proposing this AD to prevent the
potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
5589; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-5589;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-252-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 2, 2012, we issued AD 2012-20-07, Amendment 39-17213 (77
FR 63716, October 17, 2012) (``AD 2012-20-07''). AD 2012-20-07 requires
actions intended to address an unsafe condition on all Model A319,
A320, and A321 series airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2012-20-07, Airbus has issued A318/A319/A320/
A321 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014, which contains more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness limitations.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0260, dated December 5, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition. The MCAI states:
Prompted by an accident . . ., the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) published Special Federal Aviation Regulation
(SFAR) 88 [https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/EEFB3F94451DC06286256C93004F5E07?OpenDocument&Highlight=sfar 88],
and the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) published interim Policy
INT/POL/25/12. In response to these regulations, Airbus conducted a
design review to develop Fuel Airworthiness Limitations (FAL) for
Airbus A320 family aeroplanes.
The FAL were specified in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 FAL
document ref. 95A.1931/05 at issue 04 for A318/A319/A320/A321
aeroplanes. This document was approved by the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) and is now referenced in Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 ALS Part 5 to comply with EASA policy statement (EASA D2005/
CPRO).
Failure to comply with items as identified in Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 ALS Part 5 could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the aeroplane.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2011-0155R1 (https://ad.easa.europa.eu/
[[Page 22034]]
blob/easa_ad_2011_0155_R1_superseded.pdf/AD_2011-0155R1_1), which is
superseded [and which corresponds to FAA AD 2012-20-07, Amendment
39-17213 (77 FR 63716, October 17, 2012)], and requires
implementation of the new or more restrictive maintenance
requirements and/or airworthiness limitations as specified in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5 at Rev.01.
* * * * *
The required action is revising the maintenance or inspection
program to incorporate revised fuel airworthiness limitations.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
5589.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014. The service
information describes fuel system airworthiness limitations. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of [hairsp]This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance
documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and/or Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance with
these actions and/or CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(n)(1) of this proposed AD. The request should include a description of
changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued
operational safety of the airplane.
Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational requirements,
components that have been identified as airworthy or installed on the
affected airplanes before accomplishing the revision of the airplane
maintenance or inspection program or before accomplishing the revision
of the Airworthiness Limitation Section (ALS) of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness specified in this proposed AD, do not need to
be reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs. However, once the airplane
maintenance or inspection program or ALS has been revised as required
by this proposed AD, future maintenance actions on these components
must be done in accordance with the CDCCLs.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
The MCAI specifies that if there are findings from the ALS
inspection tasks, corrective actions must be accomplished in accordance
with Airbus maintenance documentation. However, this proposed AD does
not include that requirement. Operators of U.S.-registered airplanes
are required by general airworthiness and operational regulations to
perform maintenance using methods that are acceptable to the FAA. We
consider those methods to be adequate to address any corrective actions
necessitated by the findings of ALS inspections required by this
proposed AD.
Explanation of Proposed Compliance Time
In most ADs, we adopt a compliance time allowing a specified amount
of time after the AD's effective date or as specified by the MCAI,
whichever is later. In this case, however, the MCAI compliance time has
already expired. We have determined that an appropriate initial
compliance time is 60 days for revising the maintenance or inspection
program to incorporate the fuel airworthiness limitations (e.g., life
limits, tasks, and CDCCLs, and associated thresholds and intervals)
described in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014. We find 60 days an
appropriate compliance time to revise the maintenance or inspection
program. The initial compliance times for the tasks are at the times
specified in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014, or within 60 days,
whichever is later. In developing the compliance time for this action,
we considered the degree of urgency associated with addressing the
unsafe condition. This difference has been coordinated with the EASA.
Airworthiness Limitations Based on Type Design
The FAA recently became aware of an issue related to the
applicability of ADs that require incorporation of an ALS revision into
an operator's maintenance or inspection program.
Typically, when these types of ADs are issued by civil aviation
authorities of other countries, they apply to all airplanes covered
under an identified type certificate (TC). The corresponding FAA AD
typically retains applicability to all of those airplanes.
In addition, U.S. operators must operate their airplanes in an
airworthy condition, in accordance with 14 CFR 91.7(a). Included in
this obligation is the requirement to perform any maintenance or
inspections specified in the ALS, and in accordance with the ALS as
specified in 14 CFR 43.16 and 91.403(c), unless an alternative has been
approved by the FAA.
When a type certificate is issued for a type design, the specific
ALS, including revisions, is a part of that type design, as specified
in 14 CFR 21.31(c).
The sum effect of these operational and maintenance requirements is
an obligation to comply with the ALS defined in the type design
referenced in the manufacturer's conformity statement. This obligation
may introduce a conflict with an AD that requires a specific ALS
revision if new airplanes are delivered with a later revision as part
of their type design.
To address this conflict, the FAA has approved alternative methods
of compliance (AMOCs) that allow operators to incorporate the most
recent ALS revision into their maintenance/inspection programs, in lieu
of the ALS revision required by the AD. This eliminates the conflict
and enables the operator to comply with both the AD and the type
design.
However, compliance with AMOCs is normally optional, and we
recently became aware that some operators choose to retain the AD-
mandated ALS revision in their fleet-wide maintenance/inspection
programs, including those for new airplanes delivered with later ALS
revisions, to help standardize the maintenance of the fleet. To ensure
that operators comply with the applicable ALS revision for newly
delivered airplanes containing a later revision than that specified in
an AD, we plan to limit the applicability of ADs that mandate ALS
revisions to those airplanes that are subject to an earlier revision of
the ALS, either as part
[[Page 22035]]
of the type design or as mandated by an earlier AD.
This proposed AD therefore applies to the airplanes identified in
paragraph (c) of this proposed AD with an original certificate of
airworthiness or original export certificate of airworthiness that was
issued on or before the date of approval of the ALS revision identified
in this proposed AD. Operators of airplanes with an original
certificate of airworthiness or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued after that date must comply with the airworthiness
limitations specified as part of the approved type design and
referenced on the type certificate data sheet.
Record of Ex Parte Communication
In preparation of AD actions, it is the practice of the FAA to
obtain technical information and information on the operational and
economic impact from design approval holders and aircraft operators. We
discussed certain issues related to this NPRM in a recent meeting with
Airlines for America (A4A). Shortly after this NPRM is published, we
will post a summary of this meeting in the rulemaking docket. For
information on locating the docket, see ``Examining the AD Docket.''
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 953 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
The actions required by AD 2012-20-07, and retained in this
proposed AD take about 4 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the actions that are required by AD 2012-20-07 is $340 per product.
We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $81,005, or $85
per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2012-20-07, Amendment 39-17213 (77 FR 63716, October 17, 2012), and
adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-5589; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
252-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 31, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2012-20-07, Amendment 39-17213 (77 FR 63716,
October 17, 2012) (``AD 2012-20-07'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category, with
an original certificate of airworthiness or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued on or before July 19, 2014.
(1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
(2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes.
(4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Periodic
inspections.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by Airbus issuing more restrictive
maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness limitations. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the potential of ignition sources inside
fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Revision of the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) To
Incorporate Fuel Maintenance and Inspection Tasks, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2012-20-07, with no changes. For Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes,
and Model A319, A320, and A321 airplanes: Within 3 months after
August 28, 2007 (the effective date of AD 2007-15-06 (72 FR 40222,
July 24, 2007) (``AD 2007-15-06'')), revise the ALS of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5-Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, dated
February 28, 2006, as defined in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 1, dated
December 19, 2005 (approved by the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) on March 14, 2006), Section 1, ``Maintenance/Inspection
Tasks;'' or Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 2, dated July 8, 2008
(approved by the EASA on December 19, 2008), Section 1,
``Maintenance/Inspection Tasks.'' For all tasks identified in
Section 1 ``Maintenance/Inspection Tasks,'' of Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05,
Issue 1, dated December 19, 2005; or Issue 2, dated July 8, 2008;
the initial compliance times start from August 28, 2007 (the
effective date of AD 2007-15-06), and the repetitive inspections
must be accomplished thereafter at the intervals specified in
Section 1, ``Maintenance/Inspection Tasks,'' of Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05,
Issue 1, dated December 19, 2005; or Issue 2, dated July 8, 2008.
[[Page 22036]]
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Airbus Operator Information
Telex (OIT) SE 999.0076/06, dated June 20, 2006, provides guidance
on identifying the applicable sections of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 Airplane Maintenance Manual for accomplishing the tasks
specified in Section 1 ``Maintenance/Inspection Tasks,'' of Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Document
95A.1931/05, Issue 1, dated December 19, 2005; or Issue 2, dated
July 8, 2008.
(h) Retained Revision of the ALS to Incorporate Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2012-20-07, with no changes. For Airbus Model A318-111 and -112
airplanes, and Model A319, A320, and A321 airplanes: Within 12
months after August 28, 2007 (the effective date of AD 2007-15-06),
revise the ALS of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5-Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, dated February 28, 2006, as defined in Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05,
Issue 1, dated December 19, 2005 (approved by the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) on March 14, 2006), Section 2, ``Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations;'' or Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05,
Issue 2, dated July 8, 2008 (approved by EASA on December 19, 2008),
Section 2, ``Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations.''
(i) Retained Requirement: No Alternative Inspections, Inspection
Intervals, or CDCCLs, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i)(1) of
AD 2012-20-07, with no changes.
Except as required by paragraph (l) of this AD and except as
provided by paragraph (n)(1) of this AD: After accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, no
alternative inspections, inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be
used.
(j) Retained Revision of the Maintenance Program, With Specific
Delegation Approval Language in Paragraph (j)(4) of This AD
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2012-20-07, with specific delegation approval language in paragraph
(j)(4) of this AD. Within 6 months after November 21, 2012 (the
effective date of AD 2012-20-07): Revise the maintenance program to
incorporate the new or revised tasks, life limits, and CDCCLs
specified in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 4, dated August 26, 2010,
except as required in paragraph (j)(4) of this AD. The initial
compliance times and intervals are stated in this ALS document,
except as required in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(4) of this AD,
or within 6 months after November 21, 2012, whichever occurs later.
For certain tasks, the compliance times depend on the pre-
modification and post-modification status of the airplane.
Incorporating the requirements of this paragraph terminates the
corresponding requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD
only.
(1) For airplanes for which the first flight occurred before
August 28, 2007 (the effective date of AD 2007-15-06), the first
accomplishment of Tasks 281800-01-1, Functional Check of Tank Vapour
Seal and Vent Drain System; and 281800-02-1, Detailed Inspection of
Vapour Seal; must be performed no later than 11 months after
November 21, 2012 (the effective date of AD 2012-20-07).
(2) The first accomplishment of Tasks 470000-01-1, Operational
Check of Dual Flapper Shutoff Valves (DFSOV), Dual Flapper Check
Valves and Nitrogen Enriched Air (NEA) Line for Leaks; 470000-02-1,
Operational Check of Both Dual Flapper Check Valves for Leaks;
470000-03-1, Operational Check of Dual Flapper Check Valves for
Reverse Flow and NEA Line for Leaks; 470000-04-1, Operational Check
of Dual Flapper Check Valves for Reverse Flow; and 470000-05-1,
Remove Air Separation Module (ASM) and Return to Vendor for Workshop
Check; must be calculated, in accordance with paragraph (j)(2)(i) or
(j)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) From the airplane first flight for airplanes on which Airbus
modification 38062 or 38195 has been embodied in production.
(ii) From the in-service installation of the fuel tank inerting
system specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1001, Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-47-1002, Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1003,
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1004, Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
47-1006, or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1007.
(3) Although Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel Airworthiness
Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 4, dated August 26, 2010,
does not refer to Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1006 and Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-47-1007, the tasks apply as specified in
paragraphs (j)(3)(i) through (j)(3)(iv) of this AD.
(i) Tasks 470000-01-1, Operational Check of DFSOV, Dual Flapper
Check Valves and NEA Line for Leaks; and 470000-02-1, Operational
Check of Both Dual Flapper Check Valves for leaks; apply to
airplanes that have previously accomplished the actions specified in
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1007.
(ii) Task 470000-03-1, Operational Check of Dual Flapper Check
Valves for Reverse Flow and NEA Line for Leaks, applies to airplanes
that have previously accomplished the actions specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-47-1006, and that have not accomplished the
actions specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1007.
(iii) Task 470000-04-1, Operational Check of Dual Flapper Check
Valves for Reverse Flow, applies to airplanes in post-modification
38195 configuration and that have not accomplished the actions
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1007.
(iv) Task 470000-05-1, Remove ASM and return to Vendor for
Workshop Check, applies to airplanes that have previously
accomplished the actions specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
47-1007, and are in pre-modification 151529 configuration.
(4) Replace each ASM identified in table 1 to paragraph (j)(4)
of this AD in accordance with a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or EASA (or its delegated agent); or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). The compliance time for the replacement is before
the accumulation of 27,000 total flight hours (component time)--
i.e., the life limitation.
Note 2 to paragraph (j)(4) of this AD: Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 Aircraft Maintenance Manual Task 47-10-43-920-001-A, Air
Separation Module Replacement, is an additional source of guidance
for accomplishment of the removal and replacement of the ASM.
Table 1 to Paragraph (j)(4) of This AD--ASM Replacement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASM Part
Affected Airplane configuration-- No.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-modification 38062................................... 2060017-101
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1002................. 2060017-101
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1004................. 2060017-101
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1007................. 2060017-101
Post-modification 152033.................................. 2060017-102
Post-Airbus Service Bulletin A320-47-1011................. 2060017-102
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(k) Retained Requirement: No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or
CDCCLs, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2012-20-07, with no changes. Except as required by paragraph (l) of
this AD, after accomplishing the revisions required by paragraph (j)
of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals,
and/or CDCCLs may be used other than those specified in Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5-Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, dated
February 28, 2006, as defined in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Fuel
Airworthiness Limitations, Document 95A.1931/05, Issue 4, dated
August 26, 2010, unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
(l) New Requirement of This AD: Revise the Maintenance or Inspection
Program
Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, by incorporating
the fuel airworthiness limitations (e.g., life limits, tasks, and
CDCCLs, and associated thresholds and intervals) described in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 5, Fuel Airworthiness Limitations,
Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014. The initial compliance times for
the tasks are at the times specified in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
ALS Part
[[Page 22037]]
5, Fuel Airworthiness Limitations, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014,
or within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later. Incorporating the requirements of this paragraph
terminates the requirements of paragraphs (g) through (k) of this
AD.
(m) New Requirement of This AD: No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or
CDCCLs
After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (l) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions,
intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(ii) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with for AD 2012-
20-07, are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0260, dated December 5,
2014, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-5589.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-08367 Filed 4-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P