Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances, 21830-21835 [2016-08511]
Download as PDF
21830
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5—PROPOSED RULES FOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
[EPA approved Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR)]
State citation
State
effective date
Title/Subject
EPA
approval date
Explanations
Division 240—Rules for Areas with Unique Air Quality Needs
Klamath Falls Nonattainment Area Contingency Measures
240–0570
240–0580
240–0610
240–0620
240–0630
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
Applicability .............................................................................
Existing Industrial Sources Control Efficiency .......................
Continuous Monitoring for Industrial Sources ........................
Contingency Measures: New Industrial Sources ...................
Contingency Enhanced Curtailment of Use of Solid Fuel
Burning Devices and Fireplaces.
12/11/2012
12/11/2012
12/11/2012
12/11/2012
12/11/2012
Division 262—Heat Smart Program for Residential Woodstoves and Other Solid Fuel Heating Devices
262–1000 ................................
Wood Burning Contingency Measures for PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land in Oregon or any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 1, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2016–08384 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12/11/2012
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2015–0388; FRL–9944–43]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rule on Certain
Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for three
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This action would require
persons who intend to manufacture
(defined by statute to include import) or
process any of the chemical substances
for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed
rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity. The required
notification would provide EPA with
the opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
the activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2015–0388, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact:
Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–9232;
email address: moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, process,
or use the chemical substances
contained in this proposed rule. The
following list of North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include:
Manufacturers (including importers)
or processors of one or more subject
chemical substances (NAICS codes 325
and 324110), e.g., chemical
manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127 and 19 CFR
127.28. Chemical importers must certify
that the shipment of the chemical
substance complies with all applicable
rules and orders under TSCA. Importers
of chemicals subject to these SNURs
must certify their compliance with the
SNUR requirements. The EPA policy in
support of import certification appears
at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or
intend to export a chemical substance to
a proposed or final rule are subject to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
21831
the export notification provisions of
TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b))
(see § 721.20), and must comply with
the export notification requirements in
40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
received during the direct final rule
phase, no substantive comments were
submitted. EPA awaits the adverse
comments during the open comment
period for this proposed rule.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors listed in Unit III.
Once EPA determines that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) requires
persons to submit a significant new use
notice (SNUN) to EPA at least 90 days
before they manufacture or process the
chemical substance for that use. Persons
who must report are described in
§ 721.5.
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is proposing these SNURs under
TSCA section 5(a)(2) for three chemical
substances which were the subject of
PMNs P–15–221, P–15–247, and P–15–
278. These SNURs would require
persons who intend to manufacture or
process any of these chemical
substances for an activity that is
designated as a significant new use to
notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity. In accordance
with the procedures at § 721.160(c)(3)(i),
in the Federal Register publication of
October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59583) (FRL–
9933–30) EPA issued direct final SNURs
on these chemical substances, which are
the subject of PMNs. EPA received
notices of intent to submit adverse
comments on these SNURs. Therefore,
as required by § 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA
withdrew the direct final SNURs in the
Federal Register of November 20, 2015
(80 FR 72592) (FRL–9936–98), and is
now issuing this proposed rule on these
three chemical substances. The records
for the direct final SNURs on these three
chemical substances were established as
docket EPA–HQ–OPPT–2015–0388.
Those records include information
considered by the Agency in developing
the direct final rule. While notices of
intent to submit adverse comments were
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear
in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A. These
provisions describe persons subject to
the rule, recordkeeping requirements,
exemptions to reporting requirements,
and applicability of the rule to uses
occurring before the effective date of the
final rule. Provisions relating to user
fees appear at 40 CFR part 700.
According to § 721.1(c), persons subject
to these SNURs must comply with the
same SNUN requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as submitters of
PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In
particular, these requirements include
the information submission
requirements of TSCA section 5(b) and
5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by
TSCA section 5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and
(h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR
part 720. Once EPA receives a SNUN,
EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control
the activities for which it has received
the SNUN. If EPA does not take action,
EPA is required under TSCA section
5(g) to explain in the Federal Register
its reasons for not taking action.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that
EPA’s determination that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use must be made after consideration of
all relevant factors, including:
• The projected volume of
manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
• The extent to which a use changes
the type or form of exposure of human
beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
21832
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
• The extent to which a use increases
the magnitude and duration of exposure
of human beings or the environment to
a chemical substance.
• The reasonably anticipated manner
and methods of manufacturing,
processing, distribution in commerce,
and disposal of a chemical substance.
In addition to these factors
enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2), the
statute authorized EPA to consider any
other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a
significant new use for the chemical
substances that are the subject of these
SNURs, EPA considered relevant
information about the toxicity of the
chemical substances, likely human
exposures and environmental releases
associated with possible uses, and the
four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2)
factors listed in this unit.
IV. Substances Subject to This Proposed
Rule
EPA is proposing significant new use
and recordkeeping requirements for
three chemical substances in 40 CFR
part 721, subpart E. In this unit, EPA
provides the following information for
each chemical substance:
• PMN number.
• Chemical name (generic name, if
the specific name is claimed as CBI).
• Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
Registry number (assigned for nonconfidential chemical identities).
• Public comments and EPA’s
response to comments on the three
direct final SNURs
• Basis for the TSCA non-section 5(e)
SNURs (i.e., SNURs without TSCA
section 5(e) consent orders).
• Tests recommended by EPA to
provide sufficient information to
evaluate the chemical substance (see
Unit VII. for more information).
• CFR citation assigned in the
regulatory text section of this proposed
rule.
The regulatory text section of this
proposed rule specifies the activities
designated as significant new uses.
Certain new uses, including production
volume limits (i.e., limits on
manufacture volume) and other uses
designated in this proposed rule, may be
claimed as CBI.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
PMN Number P–15–221
Chemical name: Isocyanate
prepolymer (generic).
CAS number: Claimed confidential.
Basis for action: The PMN states that
the generic (non-confidential) use of the
substance will be as ingredient in an
industrial adhesive. Based on Structure
Activity Relationship (SAR) analysis of
test data on analogous diisocyanates,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
EPA identified concerns for irritation
and sensitization to the skin and lungs.
As described in the PMN, EPA does not
expect significant occupational dermal
or inhalation exposure due to use of
adequate personal protective equipment
and consumer exposures are not
expected as the PMN substance is not
used in consumer products. Therefore,
EPA has not determined that the
proposed manufacture, processing, or
use of the substance may present an
unreasonable risk. EPA has determined,
however, that any use of the substance
without a National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH)-certified particulate respirator
with an Assigned Protection Factor
(APF) of at least 10 where there is a
potential for inhalation exposure, or any
use in consumer products may cause
serious health effects. Based on this
information, the PMN substance meets
the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of a skin
sensitization test (OPPTS Test Guideline
870.2600) and a 90-day subchronic
inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test
Guideline 870.3465) would help
characterize the human health effects of
the PMN substance.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721.10871.
PMN Number P–15–247
Chemical name: Methylene
diisocyanate polymer with diols and
triols (generic).
CAS number: Claimed confidential.
Basis for action: The PMN states that
the generic (non-confidential) use of the
substance will be as an industrial
adhesive. Based on SAR analysis of test
data on analogous diisocyanates, EPA
identified concerns for respiratory and
dermal sensitization and lung and
mucous membrane irritation based on
the isocyanate moiety. As described in
the PMN, EPA does not expect
significant occupational dermal or
inhalation exposure due to use of
adequate personal protective equipment
and consumer exposures are not
expected as the PMN substance is not
used in consumer products. Therefore,
EPA has not determined that the
proposed manufacture, processing, or
use of the substance may present an
unreasonable risk. EPA has determined,
however, that any use of the substance
without a NIOSH-certified particulate
respirator with an APF of at least 10
where there is a potential for inhalation
exposure, or any use in consumer
products, may cause serious health
effects. Based on this information, the
PMN substance meets the concern
criteria at § 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of a skin
sensitization test (OPPTS Test Guideline
870.2600) and a 90-day subchronic
inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test
Guideline 870.3465) would help
characterize the human health effects of
the PMN substance.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721.10873.
PMN Number P–15–278
Chemical name: Polymer of
isophorone diisocyanate and amineterminated propoxylatedpolyol
(generic).
CAS number: Claimed confidential.
Basis for action: The PMN states that
the generic (non-confidential) use of the
substance will be as a crosslinker. Based
on analogous diisocyanates, EPA
identified concerns for potential dermal
and respiratory sensitization from
dermal and inhalation exposures and for
pulmonary toxicity from inhalation
exposure to the PMN substance when
the average molecular weight is below
2,500 daltons and any molecular weight
species below 1,000 daltons is present.
EPA does not expect significant
exposures from the form of the PMN
substance as described in the PMN.
Therefore, EPA has not determined that
the proposed manufacture of the
substance may present an unreasonable
risk. EPA has determined, however, that
any manufacture of the PMN substance
with an average molecular weight of
below 2,500 daltons and with any
molecular weight species below 1,000
daltons may cause serious health effects.
Based on this information, the PMN
substance meets the concern criteria at
§ 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that the results of a skin
sensitization test (OPPTS Test Guideline
870.2600) and a 90-day subchronic
inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test
Guideline 870.3465) would help
characterize the human health effects of
the PMN substance.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721.10874.
V. Rationale and Objectives of the
Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted
for the chemical substances that are
subject to these SNURs, EPA
determined that one or more of the
criteria of concern established at
§ 721.170 were met. For additional
discussion on these chemical
substances, see Units II. and IV. of this
proposed rule.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for
specific chemical substances which
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
have undergone premanufacture review
because the Agency wants to achieve
the following objectives with regard to
the significant new uses designated in
this proposed rule:
• EPA would receive notice of any
person’s intent to manufacture or
process a listed chemical substance for
the described significant new use before
that activity begins.
• EPA would have an opportunity to
review and evaluate data submitted in a
SNUN before the notice submitter
begins manufacturing or processing a
listed chemical substance for the
described significant new use.
• EPA would be able to regulate
prospective manufacturers or processors
of a listed chemical substance before the
described significant new use of that
chemical substance occurs, provided
that regulation is warranted pursuant to
TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical
substance does not signify that the
chemical substance is listed on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory
(TSCA Inventory). Guidance on how to
determine if a chemical substance is on
the TSCA Inventory is available on the
Internet at https://www.epa.gov/tscainventory.
VI. Applicability of the Proposed Rule
to Uses Occurring Before the Effective
Date of the Final Rule
To establish a significant new use,
EPA must determine that the use is not
ongoing. The chemical substances
subject to this proposed rule have
undergone premanufacture review. In
cases where EPA has not received a
notice of commencement (NOC) and the
chemical substance has not been added
to the TSCA Inventory, no person may
commence such activities without first
submitting a PMN. Therefore, for
chemical substances for which an NOC
has not been submitted EPA concludes
that the designated significant new uses
are not ongoing.
When chemical substances identified
in this proposed rule are added to the
TSCA Inventory, EPA recognizes that,
before the rule is effective, other persons
might engage in a use that has been
identified as a significant new use. The
identities of the three chemical
substances subject to this proposed rule
have been claimed as confidential and
EPA has received no post-PMN bona
fide submissions (per §§ 720.25 and
721.11). Based on this, the Agency
believes that it is highly unlikely that
any of the significant new uses
described in the regulatory text of this
proposed rule are ongoing.
Therefore, EPA designates April 13,
2016 as the cutoff date for determining
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
whether the new use is ongoing. Persons
who begin commercial manufacture or
processing of the chemical substances
for a significant new use identified as of
that date would have to cease any such
activity upon the effective date of the
final rule. To resume their activities,
these persons would have to first
comply with all applicable SNUR
notification requirements and wait until
the notice review period, including any
extensions, expires. If such a person met
the conditions of advance compliance
under § 721.45(h), the person would be
considered exempt from the
requirements of the SNUR. Consult the
Federal Register document of April 24,
1990 (55 FR 17376) for a more detailed
discussion of the cutoff date for ongoing
uses.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5
does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of
a SNUN. The two exceptions are:
1. Development of test data is
required where the chemical substance
subject to the SNUR is also subject to a
test rule under TSCA section 4 (see
TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be
necessary where the chemical substance
has been listed under TSCA section
5(b)(4) (see TSCA section 5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4
test rule or a TSCA section 5(b)(4)
listing covering the chemical substance,
persons are required only to submit test
data in their possession or control and
to describe any other data known to or
reasonably ascertainable by them (see 40
CFR 720.50). However, upon review of
PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing.
Descriptions of tests are provided for
informational purposes. EPA strongly
encourages persons, before performing
any testing, to consult with the Agency
pertaining to protocol selection. To
access the OCSPP test guidelines
referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Guidelines for Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.’’
The recommended tests specified in
Unit IV. may not be the only means of
addressing the potential risks of the
chemical substance. However,
submitting a SNUN without any test
data may increase the likelihood that
EPA will take action under TSCA
section 5(e), particularly if satisfactory
test results have not been obtained from
a prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA
recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21833
that they will be able to conduct the
appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware
that EPA will be better able to evaluate
SNUNs which provide detailed
information on the following:
• Human exposure and
environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the
chemical substances.
• Potential benefits of the chemical
substances.
• Information on risks posed by the
chemical substances compared to risks
posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. SNUN Submissions
According to § 721.1(c), persons
submitting a SNUN must comply with
the same notification requirements and
EPA regulatory procedures as persons
submitting a PMN, including
submission of test data on health and
environmental effects as described in 40
CFR 720.50. SNUNs must be submitted
on EPA Form No. 7710–25, generated
using e-PMN software, and submitted to
the Agency in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 40 CFR 720.40
and 721.25. E–PMN software is
available electronically at https://
www.epa.gov/reviewing-new-chemicalsunder-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca/
how-submit-e-pmn.
IX. Economic Analysis
EPA has evaluated the potential costs
of establishing SNUN requirements for
potential manufacturers and processors
of the chemical substances subject to
this proposed rule, during the
development of the direct final rule.
EPA’s complete economic analysis is
available in the docket under docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2015–0388.
X. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish
SNURs for three chemical substances
that were the subject of PMNs. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
According to PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under PRA,
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
21834
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if
applicable.
The information collection
requirements related to this proposed
rule have already been approved by
OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB
control number 2070–0012 (EPA ICR
No. 574). This proposed rule would not
impose any burden requiring additional
OMB approval. If an entity were to
submit a SNUN to the Agency, the
annual burden is estimated to average
between 30 and 170 hours per response.
This burden estimate includes the time
needed to review instructions, search
existing data sources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and
complete, review, and submit the
required SNUN.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Please remember to
include the OMB control number in any
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
On February 18, 2012, EPA certified
pursuant to RFA section 605(b) (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), that promulgation of a
SNUR does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities where the
following are true:
1. A significant number of SNUNs
would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
2. The SNUR submitted by any small
entity would not cost significantly more
than $8,300.
A copy of that certification is
available in the docket for this proposed
rule.
This proposed rule is within the
scope of the February 18, 2012
certification. Based on the Economic
Analysis discussed in Unit IX. And
EPA’s experience promulgating SNURs
(discussed in the certification), EPA
believes that the following are true:
• A significant number of SNUNs
would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
• Submission of the SNUN would not
cost any small entity significantly more
than $8,300.
Therefore, the promulgation of the
SNUR would not have a significant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
Based on EPA’s experience with
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State,
local, and Tribal governments have not
been impacted by these rulemakings,
and EPA does not have any reasons to
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government would be impacted by this
proposed rule. As such, EPA has
determined that this proposed rule
would not impose any enforceable duty,
contain any unfunded mandate, or
otherwise have any effect on small
governments subject to the requirements
of UMRA sections 202, 203, 204, or 205
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
E. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule would not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have
Tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct
effects on Indian Tribes. This proposed
rule would not significantly nor
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian Tribal governments, nor would it
involve or impose any requirements that
affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, entitled
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because this is not an economically
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866, and this
proposed rule does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitled
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this proposed rule is
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
not expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
In addition, since this proposed rule
would not involve any technical
standards, NTTAA section 12(d) (15
U.S.C. 272 note), would not apply to
this proposed rule.
J. Executive Order 12898
This proposed rule does not entail
special considerations of environmental
justice related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
chapter I be amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
2. Add § 721.10871 to subpart E to
read as follows:
■
§ 721.10871
(generic).
Isocyanate prepolymer
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as isocyanate prepolymer
(PMN P–15–221) is subject to reporting
under this section for the significant
new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in
§ 721.63(a)(4), (a)(6)(ii), and (c). When
determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as
required for § 721.63(a)(4), engineering
control measures (e.g., enclosure or
confinement of the operation, general
and local ventilation) or administrative
control measures (e.g., workplace
policies and procedures) shall be
considered and implemented to prevent
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
exposure, where feasible. The following
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified
respirators with an assigned protection
factor (APF) of at least 10 meet the
requirements of § 721.63(a)(4):
(A) NIOSH-certified power air
purifying respirator with a hood or
helmet and with appropriate gas/vapor
(acid gas, organic vapor, or substance
specific) cartridges in combination with
HEPA filters.
(B) NIOSH-certified continuous flow
supplied-air respirator equipped with a
loose fitting facepiece, hood, or helmet.
(C) NIOSH-certified negative pressure
(demand) supplied-air respirator with a
full facepiece.
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(o).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), and (i) are applicable to
manufacturers and processors of this
substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
■ 3. Add § 721.10873 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10873 Methylene diisocyanate
polymer with diols and triols (generic).
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as methylene diisocyanate
polymer with diols and triols (PMN P–
15–247) is subject to reporting under
this section for the significant new uses
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in
§ 721.63(a)(4), (a)(6)(ii), and (c). When
determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as
required for § 721.63(a)(4), engineering
control measures (e.g., enclosure or
confinement of the operation, general
and local ventilation) or administrative
control measures (e.g., workplace
policies and procedures) shall be
considered and implemented to prevent
exposure, where feasible. The following
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified
respirators with an assigned protection
factor (APF) of at least 10 meet the
requirements of § 721.63(a)(4):
(A) NIOSH-certified power air
purifying respirator with a hood or
helmet and with appropriate gas/vapor
(acid gas, organic vapor, or substance
specific) cartridges in combination with
HEPA filters.
(B) NIOSH-certified continuous flow
supplied-air respirator equipped with a
loose fitting facepiece, hood, or helmet.
(C) NIOSH-certified negative pressure
(demand) supplied-air respirator with a
full facepiece.
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(o).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), and (i) are applicable to
manufacturers and processors of this
substance.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
21835
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
■ 4. Add § 721.10874 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10874 Polymer of isophorone
diisocyanate and amine-terminated
propoxylatedpolyol (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as polymer of isophorone
diisocyanate and amine-terminated
propoxylatedpolyol (PMN P–15–278) is
subject to reporting under this section
for the significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80. The significant
new use is manufacture of the substance
where the average molecular weight is
below 2,500 daltons and where any
molecular weight species is below 1,000
daltons.
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), and (i) are applicable to
manufacturers and processors of this
substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
[FR Doc. 2016–08511 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21830-21835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08511]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0388; FRL-9944-43]
RIN 2070-AB27
Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for three chemical substances which
were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). This action would
require persons who intend to manufacture (defined by statute to
include import) or process any of the chemical substances for an
activity that is designated as a significant new use by this proposed
rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity.
The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to
evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit the
activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0388, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention
[[Page 21831]]
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact: Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-9232; email
address: moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
process, or use the chemical substances contained in this proposed
rule. The following list of North American Industrial Classification
System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:
Manufacturers (including importers) or processors of one or more
subject chemical substances (NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127
and 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical importers must certify that the shipment of
the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules and orders
under TSCA. Importers of chemicals subject to these SNURs must certify
their compliance with the SNUR requirements. The EPA policy in support
of import certification appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or intend to export a chemical
substance to a proposed or final rule are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see
Sec. 721.20), and must comply with the export notification
requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is proposing these SNURs under TSCA section 5(a)(2) for three
chemical substances which were the subject of PMNs P-15-221, P-15-247,
and P-15-278. These SNURs would require persons who intend to
manufacture or process any of these chemical substances for an activity
that is designated as a significant new use to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity. In accordance with the procedures
at Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(i), in the Federal Register publication of
October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59583) (FRL-9933-30) EPA issued direct final
SNURs on these chemical substances, which are the subject of PMNs. EPA
received notices of intent to submit adverse comments on these SNURs.
Therefore, as required by Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA withdrew the
direct final SNURs in the Federal Register of November 20, 2015 (80 FR
72592) (FRL-9936-98), and is now issuing this proposed rule on these
three chemical substances. The records for the direct final SNURs on
these three chemical substances were established as docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2015-0388. Those records include information considered by the Agency
in developing the direct final rule. While notices of intent to submit
adverse comments were received during the direct final rule phase, no
substantive comments were submitted. EPA awaits the adverse comments
during the open comment period for this proposed rule.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors, including the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2)
factors listed in Unit III. Once EPA determines that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B)
requires persons to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA
at least 90 days before they manufacture or process the chemical
substance for that use. Persons who must report are described in Sec.
721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A.
These provisions describe persons subject to the rule, recordkeeping
requirements, exemptions to reporting requirements, and applicability
of the rule to uses occurring before the effective date of the final
rule. Provisions relating to user fees appear at 40 CFR part 700.
According to Sec. 721.1(c), persons subject to these SNURs must comply
with the same SNUN requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
submitters of PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular, these
requirements include the information submission requirements of TSCA
section 5(b) and 5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by TSCA section
5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR part
720. Once EPA receives a SNUN, EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities for which it
has received the SNUN. If EPA does not take action, EPA is required
under TSCA section 5(g) to explain in the Federal Register its reasons
for not taking action.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that EPA's determination that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant new use must be made after
consideration of all relevant factors, including:
The projected volume of manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
The extent to which a use changes the type or form of
exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical substance.
[[Page 21832]]
The extent to which a use increases the magnitude and
duration of exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
The reasonably anticipated manner and methods of
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, and disposal of a
chemical substance.
In addition to these factors enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2),
the statute authorized EPA to consider any other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a significant new use for the
chemical substances that are the subject of these SNURs, EPA considered
relevant information about the toxicity of the chemical substances,
likely human exposures and environmental releases associated with
possible uses, and the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2) factors
listed in this unit.
IV. Substances Subject to This Proposed Rule
EPA is proposing significant new use and recordkeeping requirements
for three chemical substances in 40 CFR part 721, subpart E. In this
unit, EPA provides the following information for each chemical
substance:
PMN number.
Chemical name (generic name, if the specific name is
claimed as CBI).
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Registry number (assigned
for non-confidential chemical identities).
Public comments and EPA's response to comments on the
three direct final SNURs
Basis for the TSCA non-section 5(e) SNURs (i.e., SNURs
without TSCA section 5(e) consent orders).
Tests recommended by EPA to provide sufficient information
to evaluate the chemical substance (see Unit VII. for more
information).
CFR citation assigned in the regulatory text section of
this proposed rule.
The regulatory text section of this proposed rule specifies the
activities designated as significant new uses. Certain new uses,
including production volume limits (i.e., limits on manufacture volume)
and other uses designated in this proposed rule, may be claimed as CBI.
PMN Number P-15-221
Chemical name: Isocyanate prepolymer (generic).
CAS number: Claimed confidential.
Basis for action: The PMN states that the generic (non-
confidential) use of the substance will be as ingredient in an
industrial adhesive. Based on Structure Activity Relationship (SAR)
analysis of test data on analogous diisocyanates, EPA identified
concerns for irritation and sensitization to the skin and lungs. As
described in the PMN, EPA does not expect significant occupational
dermal or inhalation exposure due to use of adequate personal
protective equipment and consumer exposures are not expected as the PMN
substance is not used in consumer products. Therefore, EPA has not
determined that the proposed manufacture, processing, or use of the
substance may present an unreasonable risk. EPA has determined,
however, that any use of the substance without a National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified particulate respirator
with an Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of at least 10 where there is
a potential for inhalation exposure, or any use in consumer products
may cause serious health effects. Based on this information, the PMN
substance meets the concern criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of a skin
sensitization test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.2600) and a 90-day
subchronic inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.3465)
would help characterize the human health effects of the PMN substance.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721.10871.
PMN Number P-15-247
Chemical name: Methylene diisocyanate polymer with diols and triols
(generic).
CAS number: Claimed confidential.
Basis for action: The PMN states that the generic (non-
confidential) use of the substance will be as an industrial adhesive.
Based on SAR analysis of test data on analogous diisocyanates, EPA
identified concerns for respiratory and dermal sensitization and lung
and mucous membrane irritation based on the isocyanate moiety. As
described in the PMN, EPA does not expect significant occupational
dermal or inhalation exposure due to use of adequate personal
protective equipment and consumer exposures are not expected as the PMN
substance is not used in consumer products. Therefore, EPA has not
determined that the proposed manufacture, processing, or use of the
substance may present an unreasonable risk. EPA has determined,
however, that any use of the substance without a NIOSH-certified
particulate respirator with an APF of at least 10 where there is a
potential for inhalation exposure, or any use in consumer products, may
cause serious health effects. Based on this information, the PMN
substance meets the concern criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of a skin
sensitization test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.2600) and a 90-day
subchronic inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.3465)
would help characterize the human health effects of the PMN substance.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721.10873.
PMN Number P-15-278
Chemical name: Polymer of isophorone diisocyanate and amine-
terminated propoxylatedpolyol (generic).
CAS number: Claimed confidential.
Basis for action: The PMN states that the generic (non-
confidential) use of the substance will be as a crosslinker. Based on
analogous diisocyanates, EPA identified concerns for potential dermal
and respiratory sensitization from dermal and inhalation exposures and
for pulmonary toxicity from inhalation exposure to the PMN substance
when the average molecular weight is below 2,500 daltons and any
molecular weight species below 1,000 daltons is present. EPA does not
expect significant exposures from the form of the PMN substance as
described in the PMN. Therefore, EPA has not determined that the
proposed manufacture of the substance may present an unreasonable risk.
EPA has determined, however, that any manufacture of the PMN substance
with an average molecular weight of below 2,500 daltons and with any
molecular weight species below 1,000 daltons may cause serious health
effects. Based on this information, the PMN substance meets the concern
criteria at Sec. 721.170(b)(3)(ii).
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that the results of a skin
sensitization test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.2600) and a 90-day
subchronic inhalation toxicity test (OPPTS Test Guideline 870.3465)
would help characterize the human health effects of the PMN substance.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721.10874.
V. Rationale and Objectives of the Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted for the chemical substances
that are subject to these SNURs, EPA determined that one or more of the
criteria of concern established at Sec. 721.170 were met. For
additional discussion on these chemical substances, see Units II. and
IV. of this proposed rule.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for specific chemical substances which
[[Page 21833]]
have undergone premanufacture review because the Agency wants to
achieve the following objectives with regard to the significant new
uses designated in this proposed rule:
EPA would receive notice of any person's intent to
manufacture or process a listed chemical substance for the described
significant new use before that activity begins.
EPA would have an opportunity to review and evaluate data
submitted in a SNUN before the notice submitter begins manufacturing or
processing a listed chemical substance for the described significant
new use.
EPA would be able to regulate prospective manufacturers or
processors of a listed chemical substance before the described
significant new use of that chemical substance occurs, provided that
regulation is warranted pursuant to TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical substance does not signify that
the chemical substance is listed on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory (TSCA Inventory). Guidance on how to determine if a chemical
substance is on the TSCA Inventory is available on the Internet at
https://www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory.
VI. Applicability of the Proposed Rule to Uses Occurring Before the
Effective Date of the Final Rule
To establish a significant new use, EPA must determine that the use
is not ongoing. The chemical substances subject to this proposed rule
have undergone premanufacture review. In cases where EPA has not
received a notice of commencement (NOC) and the chemical substance has
not been added to the TSCA Inventory, no person may commence such
activities without first submitting a PMN. Therefore, for chemical
substances for which an NOC has not been submitted EPA concludes that
the designated significant new uses are not ongoing.
When chemical substances identified in this proposed rule are added
to the TSCA Inventory, EPA recognizes that, before the rule is
effective, other persons might engage in a use that has been identified
as a significant new use. The identities of the three chemical
substances subject to this proposed rule have been claimed as
confidential and EPA has received no post-PMN bona fide submissions
(per Sec. Sec. 720.25 and 721.11). Based on this, the Agency believes
that it is highly unlikely that any of the significant new uses
described in the regulatory text of this proposed rule are ongoing.
Therefore, EPA designates April 13, 2016 as the cutoff date for
determining whether the new use is ongoing. Persons who begin
commercial manufacture or processing of the chemical substances for a
significant new use identified as of that date would have to cease any
such activity upon the effective date of the final rule. To resume
their activities, these persons would have to first comply with all
applicable SNUR notification requirements and wait until the notice
review period, including any extensions, expires. If such a person met
the conditions of advance compliance under Sec. 721.45(h), the person
would be considered exempt from the requirements of the SNUR. Consult
the Federal Register document of April 24, 1990 (55 FR 17376) for a
more detailed discussion of the cutoff date for ongoing uses.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5 does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of a SNUN. The two exceptions
are:
1. Development of test data is required where the chemical
substance subject to the SNUR is also subject to a test rule under TSCA
section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be necessary where the chemical
substance has been listed under TSCA section 5(b)(4) (see TSCA section
5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4 test rule or a TSCA section
5(b)(4) listing covering the chemical substance, persons are required
only to submit test data in their possession or control and to describe
any other data known to or reasonably ascertainable by them (see 40 CFR
720.50). However, upon review of PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing. Descriptions of tests are
provided for informational purposes. EPA strongly encourages persons,
before performing any testing, to consult with the Agency pertaining to
protocol selection. To access the OCSPP test guidelines referenced in
this document electronically, please go to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and
select ``Test Guidelines for Pesticides and Toxic Substances.''
The recommended tests specified in Unit IV. may not be the only
means of addressing the potential risks of the chemical substance.
However, submitting a SNUN without any test data may increase the
likelihood that EPA will take action under TSCA section 5(e),
particularly if satisfactory test results have not been obtained from a
prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so that they will be able to
conduct the appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware that EPA will be better able to
evaluate SNUNs which provide detailed information on the following:
Human exposure and environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the chemical substances.
Potential benefits of the chemical substances.
Information on risks posed by the chemical substances
compared to risks posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. SNUN Submissions
According to Sec. 721.1(c), persons submitting a SNUN must comply
with the same notification requirements and EPA regulatory procedures
as persons submitting a PMN, including submission of test data on
health and environmental effects as described in 40 CFR 720.50. SNUNs
must be submitted on EPA Form No. 7710-25, generated using e-PMN
software, and submitted to the Agency in accordance with the procedures
set forth in 40 CFR 720.40 and 721.25. E-PMN software is available
electronically at https://www.epa.gov/reviewing-new-chemicals-under-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca/how-submit-e-pmn.
IX. Economic Analysis
EPA has evaluated the potential costs of establishing SNUN
requirements for potential manufacturers and processors of the chemical
substances subject to this proposed rule, during the development of the
direct final rule. EPA's complete economic analysis is available in the
docket under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0388.
X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish SNURs for three chemical
substances that were the subject of PMNs. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
According to PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information that requires OMB approval under PRA, unless
it has been approved by OMB and displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40
[[Page 21834]]
of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register, are listed in 40
CFR part 9, and included on the related collection instrument or form,
if applicable.
The information collection requirements related to this proposed
rule have already been approved by OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB
control number 2070-0012 (EPA ICR No. 574). This proposed rule would
not impose any burden requiring additional OMB approval. If an entity
were to submit a SNUN to the Agency, the annual burden is estimated to
average between 30 and 170 hours per response. This burden estimate
includes the time needed to review instructions, search existing data
sources, gather and maintain the data needed, and complete, review, and
submit the required SNUN.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection techniques, to the Director,
Collection Strategies Division, Office of Environmental Information
(2822T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. Please remember to include the OMB control
number in any correspondence, but do not submit any completed forms to
this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
On February 18, 2012, EPA certified pursuant to RFA section 605(b)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that promulgation of a SNUR does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
where the following are true:
1. A significant number of SNUNs would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
2. The SNUR submitted by any small entity would not cost
significantly more than $8,300.
A copy of that certification is available in the docket for this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule is within the scope of the February 18, 2012
certification. Based on the Economic Analysis discussed in Unit IX. And
EPA's experience promulgating SNURs (discussed in the certification),
EPA believes that the following are true:
A significant number of SNUNs would not be submitted by
small entities in response to the SNUR.
Submission of the SNUN would not cost any small entity
significantly more than $8,300.
Therefore, the promulgation of the SNUR would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
Based on EPA's experience with proposing and finalizing SNURs,
State, local, and Tribal governments have not been impacted by these
rulemakings, and EPA does not have any reasons to believe that any
State, local, or Tribal government would be impacted by this proposed
rule. As such, EPA has determined that this proposed rule would not
impose any enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or otherwise
have any effect on small governments subject to the requirements of
UMRA sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
E. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule would not have a substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have Tribal implications because it is
not expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
proposed rule would not significantly nor uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal governments, nor would it involve or
impose any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045,
entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory action as defined by Executive
Order 12866, and this proposed rule does not address environmental
health or safety risks disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because this proposed rule is not expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
In addition, since this proposed rule would not involve any
technical standards, NTTAA section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), would
not apply to this proposed rule.
J. Executive Order 12898
This proposed rule does not entail special considerations of
environmental justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order
12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
2. Add Sec. 721.10871 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10871 Isocyanate prepolymer (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified generically as
isocyanate prepolymer (PMN P-15-221) is subject to reporting under this
section for the significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63(a)(4), (a)(6)(ii), and (c). When determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as required for Sec. 721.63(a)(4),
engineering control measures (e.g., enclosure or confinement of the
operation, general and local ventilation) or administrative control
measures (e.g., workplace policies and procedures) shall be considered
and implemented to prevent
[[Page 21835]]
exposure, where feasible. The following National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified respirators with an
assigned protection factor (APF) of at least 10 meet the requirements
of Sec. 721.63(a)(4):
(A) NIOSH-certified power air purifying respirator with a hood or
helmet and with appropriate gas/vapor (acid gas, organic vapor, or
substance specific) cartridges in combination with HEPA filters.
(B) NIOSH-certified continuous flow supplied-air respirator
equipped with a loose fitting facepiece, hood, or helmet.
(C) NIOSH-certified negative pressure (demand) supplied-air
respirator with a full facepiece.
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(o).
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a), (b), (c), (d), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
0
3. Add Sec. 721.10873 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10873 Methylene diisocyanate polymer with diols and triols
(generic).
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified generically as
methylene diisocyanate polymer with diols and triols (PMN P-15-247) is
subject to reporting under this section for the significant new uses
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63(a)(4), (a)(6)(ii), and (c). When determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as required for Sec. 721.63(a)(4),
engineering control measures (e.g., enclosure or confinement of the
operation, general and local ventilation) or administrative control
measures (e.g., workplace policies and procedures) shall be considered
and implemented to prevent exposure, where feasible. The following
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified
respirators with an assigned protection factor (APF) of at least 10
meet the requirements of Sec. 721.63(a)(4):
(A) NIOSH-certified power air purifying respirator with a hood or
helmet and with appropriate gas/vapor (acid gas, organic vapor, or
substance specific) cartridges in combination with HEPA filters.
(B) NIOSH-certified continuous flow supplied-air respirator
equipped with a loose fitting facepiece, hood, or helmet.
(C) NIOSH-certified negative pressure (demand) supplied-air
respirator with a full facepiece.
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(o).
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a), (b), (c), (d), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
0
4. Add Sec. 721.10874 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. 721.10874 Polymer of isophorone diisocyanate and amine-
terminated propoxylatedpolyol (generic).
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified generically as polymer
of isophorone diisocyanate and amine-terminated propoxylatedpolyol (PMN
P-15-278) is subject to reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80. The significant new use is manufacture of
the substance where the average molecular weight is below 2,500 daltons
and where any molecular weight species is below 1,000 daltons.
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a), (b), (c), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
[FR Doc. 2016-08511 Filed 4-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P