Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 21720-21722 [2016-07839]
Download as PDF
21720
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
0137–01B, dated February 21, 2013, which is
not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (o)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (n)(4)(i) and (n)(4)(ii) apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Eric Lin, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone: 425–917–6412; fax:
425–917–6590; email: Eric.Lin@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (p)(3) and (p)(4) of this AD.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(p) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:03 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777–57–0094, Revision 1, dated
November 5, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
31, 2016.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–08359 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–2959; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–008–AD; Amendment
39–18470; AD 2016–07–25]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787–8
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports indicating that the ram air
turbine (RAT) assembly may fail to
operate if deployed at low airspeeds.
This AD requires replacing either the
RAT pump and control module
assembly or the entire RAT assembly.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the RAT assembly to operate
at low air speeds. The volume fuse on
the RAT assembly may be activated inflight before the RAT is deployed. This
may lead to improper pump hydraulic
pressure offloading when the RAT is
needed. Failure of the RAT to operate in
an all engine out event would result in
loss of control of the airplane.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This AD is effective May 18,
2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of May 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA
98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
2959.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
2959; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean J. Schauer, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6479; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
sean.schauer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
July 24, 2015 (80 FR 43972) (‘‘the
NPRM’’). The NPRM was prompted by
reports indicating that the RAT
assembly may fail to operate if deployed
at low airspeeds. The NPRM proposed
to require replacing either the RAT
pump and control module assembly or
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the entire RAT assembly. We are issuing
this AD to prevent failure of the RAT
assembly to operate at low air speeds.
The volume fuse on the RAT assembly
may be activated in-flight before the
RAT is deployed. This may lead to
improper pump hydraulic pressure
offloading when the RAT is needed.
Failure of the RAT to operate in an all
engine out event would result in loss of
control of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
United Airlines stated that it supports
the NPRM.
Request for Correction of RAT
Minimum Design Speed
Boeing requested that we revise the
NPRM to state that the RAT minimum
design speed is 120 knots, not 130
knots. Boeing explained that the RAT
will remain operational as the airplane
decelerates through the minimum RAT
design speed of 120 knots, not 130
knots. Boeing expressed that the
performance of the RAT was shown to
meet the Boeing Model 787 requirement
that specifies 120 knots as the minimum
RAT design speed.
We agree that the RAT will remain
operational as the airplane decelerates
through the minimum RAT design
speed of 120 knots, not 130 knots.
However, that specific information is in
the preamble of the NPRM, which is not
restated in this final rule. Therefore, no
changes have been made to this final
rule in this regard.
Request To Revise Compliance Time
The Air Line Pilots Association
requested that we revise the compliance
time of 36 months, to 12 months
because the 36 months compliance time
is too long, and that 12 months would
be more suitable.
We disagree with the request to revise
the compliance time. No data was
submitted to substantiate the request
made by the commenter. Engineering
analysis indicates that 36 months is an
appropriate compliance time to
complete the required actions of this
AD, and provides an acceptable level of
safety. Most ADs, including this one,
permit operators to accomplish the
requirements of an AD at a time earlier
than the specified compliance time;
therefore, an operator may choose to
perform the actions required by this AD
earlier then the specified compliance
time. We have made no changes to this
final rule in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
21721
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
as proposed except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB290015–00,
Issue 002, dated November 25, 2014.
The service information describes
procedures for replacing either the RAT
pump and control module assembly or
the RAT assembly including an
installation test and corrective actions if
necessary. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 12
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Replacement ...........................................................................
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:03 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
Parts cost
Labor cost
7 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $595.
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
N/A
$595
$7,140
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
21722
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB290015–00, Issue
001, dated September 4, 2014, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2016–07–25 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–18470; Docket No.
FAA–2015–2959; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–008–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective May 18, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787–81205–SB290015–00,
Issue 002, dated November 25, 2014.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 29, Hydraulic Power.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports
indicating that the ram air turbine (RAT)
assembly may fail to operate if deployed at
low airspeeds. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the RAT assembly to
operate at low air speeds. The volume fuse
on the RAT assembly may be activated inflight before the RAT is deployed. This may
lead to improper pump hydraulic pressure
offloading when the RAT is needed. Failure
of the RAT to operate in an all engine out
event would result in loss of control of the
airplane.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Replacement
Within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, replace the RAT pump and
control module assembly or the RAT
assembly, including an installation test and
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB290015–00, Issue 002, dated November 25,
2014. Do all applicable corrective actions
before further flight.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:03 Apr 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Sean J. Schauer, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM 130S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6479; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
sean.schauer@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB290015–00, Issue 002, dated
November 25, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
26, 2016.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–07839 Filed 4–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–4810; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–090–AD; Amendment
39–18475; AD 2016–07–30]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A330–200, –200
Freighter, and –300 series airplanes, and
all Airbus Model A340–200, –300, –500,
and –600 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report of blockage of
Angle of Attack (AOA) probes during
climb, leading to activation of the Alpha
Protection (Alpha Prot) while the Mach
number increased. This activation could
cause a continuous nose-down pitch
rate that cannot be stopped with
backward sidestick input, even in the
full backward position. For certain
airplanes, this AD requires replacing
certain AOA sensors (probes) with
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21720-21722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07839]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-2959; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-008-AD;
Amendment 39-18470; AD 2016-07-25]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports indicating that the ram air turbine (RAT) assembly may fail to
operate if deployed at low airspeeds. This AD requires replacing either
the RAT pump and control module assembly or the entire RAT assembly. We
are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the RAT assembly to operate
at low air speeds. The volume fuse on the RAT assembly may be activated
in-flight before the RAT is deployed. This may lead to improper pump
hydraulic pressure offloading when the RAT is needed. Failure of the
RAT to operate in an all engine out event would result in loss of
control of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective May 18, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 18,
2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2959.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2959; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean J. Schauer, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6479; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
sean.schauer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 787-8 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
July 24, 2015 (80 FR 43972) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by
reports indicating that the RAT assembly may fail to operate if
deployed at low airspeeds. The NPRM proposed to require replacing
either the RAT pump and control module assembly or
[[Page 21721]]
the entire RAT assembly. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of
the RAT assembly to operate at low air speeds. The volume fuse on the
RAT assembly may be activated in-flight before the RAT is deployed.
This may lead to improper pump hydraulic pressure offloading when the
RAT is needed. Failure of the RAT to operate in an all engine out event
would result in loss of control of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
United Airlines stated that it supports the NPRM.
Request for Correction of RAT Minimum Design Speed
Boeing requested that we revise the NPRM to state that the RAT
minimum design speed is 120 knots, not 130 knots. Boeing explained that
the RAT will remain operational as the airplane decelerates through the
minimum RAT design speed of 120 knots, not 130 knots. Boeing expressed
that the performance of the RAT was shown to meet the Boeing Model 787
requirement that specifies 120 knots as the minimum RAT design speed.
We agree that the RAT will remain operational as the airplane
decelerates through the minimum RAT design speed of 120 knots, not 130
knots. However, that specific information is in the preamble of the
NPRM, which is not restated in this final rule. Therefore, no changes
have been made to this final rule in this regard.
Request To Revise Compliance Time
The Air Line Pilots Association requested that we revise the
compliance time of 36 months, to 12 months because the 36 months
compliance time is too long, and that 12 months would be more suitable.
We disagree with the request to revise the compliance time. No data
was submitted to substantiate the request made by the commenter.
Engineering analysis indicates that 36 months is an appropriate
compliance time to complete the required actions of this AD, and
provides an acceptable level of safety. Most ADs, including this one,
permit operators to accomplish the requirements of an AD at a time
earlier than the specified compliance time; therefore, an operator may
choose to perform the actions required by this AD earlier then the
specified compliance time. We have made no changes to this final rule
in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290015-00,
Issue 002, dated November 25, 2014. The service information describes
procedures for replacing either the RAT pump and control module
assembly or the RAT assembly including an installation test and
corrective actions if necessary. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 12 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement......................... 7 work-hours x $85 per N/A $595 $7,140
hour = $595.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
[[Page 21722]]
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-07-25 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18470; Docket No. FAA-
2015-2959; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-008-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective May 18, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB290015-00, Issue 002, dated November 25, 2014.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29, Hydraulic
Power.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports indicating that the ram air
turbine (RAT) assembly may fail to operate if deployed at low
airspeeds. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the RAT
assembly to operate at low air speeds. The volume fuse on the RAT
assembly may be activated in-flight before the RAT is deployed. This
may lead to improper pump hydraulic pressure offloading when the RAT
is needed. Failure of the RAT to operate in an all engine out event
would result in loss of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Replacement
Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the RAT pump and control module assembly or the RAT assembly,
including an installation test and applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290015-00, Issue 002, dated November
25, 2014. Do all applicable corrective actions before further
flight.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB290015-00, Issue 001, dated September 4, 2014, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Sean J. Schauer,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM 130S, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6479; fax: 425-917-6590; email: sean.schauer@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (k)(3) and (k)(4) of this AD.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB290015-00, Issue
002, dated November 25, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 26, 2016.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-07839 Filed 4-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P