Medicaid Program; Deadline for Access Monitoring Review Plan Submissions, 21479-21480 [2016-08368]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no collection
of information requirements. Therefore
the Paperwork Reduction Act does not
apply to this document.
(Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(t).)
Justin R. Ehrenwerth,
Executive Director, Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council.
[FR Doc. 2016–08319 Filed 4–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–58–P
§ 447.203(b). These regulations
established that states must develop and
submit to CMS an access monitoring
review plan by July 1, 2016 for the
following service categories: Primary
care services (including those provided
by a physician, FQHC, clinic or dental
care); physician specialist services (for
example, cardiology, urology,
radiology); behavioral health services
(including mental health and substance
use disorder); pre- and post-natal
obstetric services, including labor and
delivery; and home health services.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
II. Discussion and Provisions of This
Final Regulation
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
In the November 2, 2015 final rule
with comment period, we solicited
comments on § 447.203(b)(5).
Specifically, we solicited comments on
the scope of services required for
ongoing review in the review plans, the
elements of review required through the
plans, whether we should allow
exemptions to the rule based on state
program characteristics (for example,
high managed care enrollment), and the
deadline for submission of the initial
access monitoring review plan. We
received many comments that were
outside of the scope of issues on which
we solicited comments. Several
commenters raised concerns over CMS’s
characterization in the regulatory
preamble of the Supreme Court
Decision: Armstrong v. Exceptional
Child Center, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1378
(2015). Though we did not solicit
comments on this issue, we agree with
commenters that the decision is subject
to judicial interpretation and we did not
intend to imply an interpretation by the
agency.
The following is a summary of the
comments and our responses on
§ 447.203(b)(5).
Comment: We received many
comments requesting that CMS not
allow exemptions based on high
managed care enrollment or other
program features.
Response: While we continue to
consider whether exemptions might be
warranted in some circumstances, we
believe that further experience with the
access monitoring review system set
forth in the final rule with comment
period is necessary to determine the
appropriate circumstances. The
commenters did not offer consistent
suggestions or supporting evidence to
set a threshold that could exempt states,
nor any suggestions for alternatives
states might use to demonstrate
compliance with section 1902(a)(30)(A)
of the Act outside of the final rule with
comment period requirements.
42 CFR Part 447
[CMS–2328–F2]
RIN 0938–AS89
Medicaid Program; Deadline for
Access Monitoring Review Plan
Submissions
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In the November 2, 2015
Federal Register, we published a final
rule with comment period entitled
‘‘Medicaid Program: Methods for
Assuring Access to Covered Medicaid
Services.’’ The final rule with comment
period established that states must
develop and submit to CMS an access
monitoring review plan by July 1, 2016.
This document revises the deadline for
states’ access monitoring review plan
submission to CMS until October 1,
2016.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on April 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeremy Silanskis, (410) 786–1592.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
In the November 2, 2015 Federal
Register (80 FR 67576), we published
the ‘‘Medicaid Program: Methods for
Assuring Access to Covered Medicaid
Services’’ final rule with comment
period that outlined a transparent datadriven process for states to document
whether Medicaid payments are
sufficient to enlist providers to assure
beneficiary access to covered care and
services consistent with section
1902(a)(30)(A) of the Social Security Act
(the Act). This final rule with comment
period included new § 447.203(b)(1)
through (8) and revisions to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:11 Apr 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21479
Comment: A number of commenters
recommended that CMS expand the
services that CMS requires states to
review in access monitoring plans.
Response: Commenters that requested
additional services did not provide
sufficient data to compel us to modify
the list of core services subject to the
ongoing access reviews. The core
services included in the final rule with
comment period (that is, primary care
services, physician specialist services,
behavioral health services, pre- and
post-natal obstetric services and home
health services) were selected because
they are frequently used services in
Medicaid and access to these services
indicates that an individual has primary
sources of care, which may increase the
likelihood of having their care needs
met. We also note the final rule with
comment period provides providers an
opportunity and mechanism to bring
access concerns to the attention of state
Medicaid agencies and provide feedback
on rate changes that may have a
negative effect on access before states
submit proposals to CMS.
Comment: Several commenters
requested CMS change the due date by
which states are required to develop and
submit the initial Access Monitoring
Review Plans. Commenters noted that
state agency staff may have difficulty
developing and submitting the initial
review plans within the July 1, 2016
timeframe for first year reviews. These
commenters offered several different
dates as an alternative, including:
January 1, 2017, July 1, 2017, and 6
months following the close of the state’s
next legislative session. A number of
other commenters requested CMS
maintain the timelines established in
the final rule.
Response: We established the July 1,
2016 deadline for developing and
submitting the access monitoring review
plans in the final rule with comment
period after careful consideration of
issues raised through comments on the
notice of proposed rulemaking (76 FR
26342) and after weighing all of the
policies discussed in the final rule.
Since issuing the final rule with
comment period, we have been working
closely with states on developing the
access monitoring review plans. States
are actively engaged in developing plans
and have raised significant concerns
over fulfilling the requirements of the
rule by the July 1, 2016 deadline.
Several states have noted that additional
time will allow them to develop more
robust and proficient review plans, and
leave them better prepared to analyze
and monitor compliance with section
1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act. We agree with
this assessment and believe that there
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
21480
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
are programmatic benefits to revising
the due date and making conforming
changes to the deadline for submission
in subsequent review periods.
Revision to the Access Monitoring
Review Plan Timeframe: Based on
concerns raised by commenters, in this
final rule we are revising the deadline
for submission effective date of the
initial access monitoring review plan
timeframe provision at § 447.203(b)(5)
introductory text until October 1, 2016.
A conforming change will also be made
to the deadline for submission in
subsequent review periods at
§ 447.203(b)(5)(i) to October 1.
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delayed Effective Date
Under section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
the agency is required to publish a
notice of the proposed rule in the
Federal Register before the provisions
of a rule take effect. Similarly, section
1871(b)(1) of the Act requires the
Secretary to provide for notice of the
proposed rule in the Federal Register
and provide a period of not less than 60
days for public comment. In addition,
section 553(d) of the APA, and section
1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of the Act mandate a 30day delay in effective date after issuance
or publication of a rule. Sections
553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) of the APA
provide for exceptions from the APA
notice and comment, and delay in
effective date requirements; similarly,
sections 1871(b)(2)(C) and
1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act provide
exceptions from the notice and
comment, and delay in effective date
requirements of the Act. Section
553(b)(B) of the APA and section
1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act authorize an
agency to dispense with normal notice
and comment rulemaking procedures
for good cause if the agency makes a
finding that the notice and comment
process is impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest; and
includes a statement of the finding and
the reasons for it in the notice. In
addition, both section 553(d)(3) of the
APA and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the
Act allow the agency to avoid the 30day delay in effective date where such
delay is contrary to the public interest
and the agency includes in the rule a
statement of the finding and the reasons
for it.
Because the deadlines for submission
of access monitoring review plans are
rules of procedure, the notice and
comment requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553
do not apply to this delay of the
submission date. See 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(A). To the extent that section
553 applies in these circumstances
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:11 Apr 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
however, CMS finds that the action
comes within the provision’s good cause
exceptions because obtaining additional
public comment is impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). Given
the imminence of the submission date,
and the need for states to plan and
allocate resources in advance, seeking
public comment and having a delayed
effective date for this short delay in the
deadline for submission of access
monitoring review plans is
impracticable. And, because we
provided an opportunity for public
comment on issues that included the
submission deadlines, further
opportunity is not necessary. Moreover,
we believe that delay of the submission
deadlines would further the public
interest in orderly implementation of
regulatory requirements, and in
ensuring development of viable access
monitoring review plans in light of
assertions by commenters that
compliance with the original
submission deadlines might be
infeasible or disruptive.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
The November 2, 2015 final rule with
comment period stipulated that states
must develop and submit (to CMS) their
initial access monitoring review plan by
July 1, 2016. We are now extending the
submission deadline to October 1, 2016.
Similarly, we are revising the deadline
for subsequent review periods from July
1 to October 1. Otherwise, this final rule
does not impose any new or revised
information collection requirements or
burden. The November 2, 2015,
information collection requirements and
burden are approved by OMB under
control number 0938–1134 (CMS–
10391).
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
In the November 2, 2015 final rule
with comment period, we discussed the
impact of the access monitoring review
plan requirements on states. We do not
believe this delay of the deadline for
submission of the access monitoring
review plans will change any of the
discussion in the impact statement of
the November 2, 2015 final rule with
comment period.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this regulation
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 447
Accounting, Administrative practice
and procedure, Drugs, Grant programshealth, Health facilities, Health
professions, Medicaid, Reporting and
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
recordkeeping requirements, Rural
areas.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR
chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 447—PAYMENTS FOR
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 447
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 1102 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1302).
§ 447.203
[Amended]
2. Section 447.203 is amended by:
a. In paragraph (b)(5) introductory
text, removing the date ‘‘July 1, 2016’’
and adding in its place the date
‘‘October 1, 2016’’.
■ b. In paragraph (b)(5)(i), removing all
instances of the date ‘‘July 1’’ and
adding in their place the date ‘‘October
1’’.
■
■
Dated: March 11, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–08368 Filed 4–8–16; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 20
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2015–0034;
FF09M21200–167–FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018–BA70
Migratory Bird Hunting; Final
Frameworks for Migratory Bird Hunting
Regulations
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, published a final rule
in the Federal Register on March 28,
2016, that prescribes final frameworks
from which States may select season
dates, limits, and other options for the
2016–17 migratory bird hunting
seasons. In that rule, we made an error
in the daily bag limit for canvasbacks in
Alaska. We intended to increase the
daily bag limit for canvasbacks in
Alaska, as we did for the rest of the
United States, to 2 birds. We also
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21479-21480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08368]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 447
[CMS-2328-F2]
RIN 0938-AS89
Medicaid Program; Deadline for Access Monitoring Review Plan
Submissions
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In the November 2, 2015 Federal Register, we published a final
rule with comment period entitled ``Medicaid Program: Methods for
Assuring Access to Covered Medicaid Services.'' The final rule with
comment period established that states must develop and submit to CMS
an access monitoring review plan by July 1, 2016. This document revises
the deadline for states' access monitoring review plan submission to
CMS until October 1, 2016.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on April 8,
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Silanskis, (410) 786-1592.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the November 2, 2015 Federal Register (80 FR 67576), we
published the ``Medicaid Program: Methods for Assuring Access to
Covered Medicaid Services'' final rule with comment period that
outlined a transparent data-driven process for states to document
whether Medicaid payments are sufficient to enlist providers to assure
beneficiary access to covered care and services consistent with section
1902(a)(30)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act). This final rule
with comment period included new Sec. 447.203(b)(1) through (8) and
revisions to Sec. 447.203(b). These regulations established that
states must develop and submit to CMS an access monitoring review plan
by July 1, 2016 for the following service categories: Primary care
services (including those provided by a physician, FQHC, clinic or
dental care); physician specialist services (for example, cardiology,
urology, radiology); behavioral health services (including mental
health and substance use disorder); pre- and post-natal obstetric
services, including labor and delivery; and home health services.
II. Discussion and Provisions of This Final Regulation
In the November 2, 2015 final rule with comment period, we
solicited comments on Sec. 447.203(b)(5). Specifically, we solicited
comments on the scope of services required for ongoing review in the
review plans, the elements of review required through the plans,
whether we should allow exemptions to the rule based on state program
characteristics (for example, high managed care enrollment), and the
deadline for submission of the initial access monitoring review plan.
We received many comments that were outside of the scope of issues on
which we solicited comments. Several commenters raised concerns over
CMS's characterization in the regulatory preamble of the Supreme Court
Decision: Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1378
(2015). Though we did not solicit comments on this issue, we agree with
commenters that the decision is subject to judicial interpretation and
we did not intend to imply an interpretation by the agency.
The following is a summary of the comments and our responses on
Sec. 447.203(b)(5).
Comment: We received many comments requesting that CMS not allow
exemptions based on high managed care enrollment or other program
features.
Response: While we continue to consider whether exemptions might be
warranted in some circumstances, we believe that further experience
with the access monitoring review system set forth in the final rule
with comment period is necessary to determine the appropriate
circumstances. The commenters did not offer consistent suggestions or
supporting evidence to set a threshold that could exempt states, nor
any suggestions for alternatives states might use to demonstrate
compliance with section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act outside of the final
rule with comment period requirements.
Comment: A number of commenters recommended that CMS expand the
services that CMS requires states to review in access monitoring plans.
Response: Commenters that requested additional services did not
provide sufficient data to compel us to modify the list of core
services subject to the ongoing access reviews. The core services
included in the final rule with comment period (that is, primary care
services, physician specialist services, behavioral health services,
pre- and post-natal obstetric services and home health services) were
selected because they are frequently used services in Medicaid and
access to these services indicates that an individual has primary
sources of care, which may increase the likelihood of having their care
needs met. We also note the final rule with comment period provides
providers an opportunity and mechanism to bring access concerns to the
attention of state Medicaid agencies and provide feedback on rate
changes that may have a negative effect on access before states submit
proposals to CMS.
Comment: Several commenters requested CMS change the due date by
which states are required to develop and submit the initial Access
Monitoring Review Plans. Commenters noted that state agency staff may
have difficulty developing and submitting the initial review plans
within the July 1, 2016 timeframe for first year reviews. These
commenters offered several different dates as an alternative,
including: January 1, 2017, July 1, 2017, and 6 months following the
close of the state's next legislative session. A number of other
commenters requested CMS maintain the timelines established in the
final rule.
Response: We established the July 1, 2016 deadline for developing
and submitting the access monitoring review plans in the final rule
with comment period after careful consideration of issues raised
through comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking (76 FR 26342) and
after weighing all of the policies discussed in the final rule. Since
issuing the final rule with comment period, we have been working
closely with states on developing the access monitoring review plans.
States are actively engaged in developing plans and have raised
significant concerns over fulfilling the requirements of the rule by
the July 1, 2016 deadline. Several states have noted that additional
time will allow them to develop more robust and proficient review
plans, and leave them better prepared to analyze and monitor compliance
with section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act. We agree with this assessment
and believe that there
[[Page 21480]]
are programmatic benefits to revising the due date and making
conforming changes to the deadline for submission in subsequent review
periods.
Revision to the Access Monitoring Review Plan Timeframe: Based on
concerns raised by commenters, in this final rule we are revising the
deadline for submission effective date of the initial access monitoring
review plan timeframe provision at Sec. 447.203(b)(5) introductory
text until October 1, 2016. A conforming change will also be made to
the deadline for submission in subsequent review periods at Sec.
447.203(b)(5)(i) to October 1.
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delayed Effective Date
Under section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the
agency is required to publish a notice of the proposed rule in the
Federal Register before the provisions of a rule take effect.
Similarly, section 1871(b)(1) of the Act requires the Secretary to
provide for notice of the proposed rule in the Federal Register and
provide a period of not less than 60 days for public comment. In
addition, section 553(d) of the APA, and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of
the Act mandate a 30-day delay in effective date after issuance or
publication of a rule. Sections 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) of the APA
provide for exceptions from the APA notice and comment, and delay in
effective date requirements; similarly, sections 1871(b)(2)(C) and
1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act provide exceptions from the notice and
comment, and delay in effective date requirements of the Act. Section
553(b)(B) of the APA and section 1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act authorize an
agency to dispense with normal notice and comment rulemaking procedures
for good cause if the agency makes a finding that the notice and
comment process is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest; and includes a statement of the finding and the
reasons for it in the notice. In addition, both section 553(d)(3) of
the APA and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act allow the agency to
avoid the 30-day delay in effective date where such delay is contrary
to the public interest and the agency includes in the rule a statement
of the finding and the reasons for it.
Because the deadlines for submission of access monitoring review
plans are rules of procedure, the notice and comment requirements of 5
U.S.C. 553 do not apply to this delay of the submission date. See 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A). To the extent that section 553 applies in these
circumstances however, CMS finds that the action comes within the
provision's good cause exceptions because obtaining additional public
comment is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). Given the imminence of the
submission date, and the need for states to plan and allocate resources
in advance, seeking public comment and having a delayed effective date
for this short delay in the deadline for submission of access
monitoring review plans is impracticable. And, because we provided an
opportunity for public comment on issues that included the submission
deadlines, further opportunity is not necessary. Moreover, we believe
that delay of the submission deadlines would further the public
interest in orderly implementation of regulatory requirements, and in
ensuring development of viable access monitoring review plans in light
of assertions by commenters that compliance with the original
submission deadlines might be infeasible or disruptive.
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
The November 2, 2015 final rule with comment period stipulated that
states must develop and submit (to CMS) their initial access monitoring
review plan by July 1, 2016. We are now extending the submission
deadline to October 1, 2016. Similarly, we are revising the deadline
for subsequent review periods from July 1 to October 1. Otherwise, this
final rule does not impose any new or revised information collection
requirements or burden. The November 2, 2015, information collection
requirements and burden are approved by OMB under control number 0938-
1134 (CMS-10391).
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
In the November 2, 2015 final rule with comment period, we
discussed the impact of the access monitoring review plan requirements
on states. We do not believe this delay of the deadline for submission
of the access monitoring review plans will change any of the discussion
in the impact statement of the November 2, 2015 final rule with comment
period.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
regulation was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 447
Accounting, Administrative practice and procedure, Drugs, Grant
programs-health, Health facilities, Health professions, Medicaid,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rural areas.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 447--PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 447 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 1102 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1302).
Sec. 447.203 [Amended]
0
2. Section 447.203 is amended by:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(5) introductory text, removing the date ``July 1,
2016'' and adding in its place the date ``October 1, 2016''.
0
b. In paragraph (b)(5)(i), removing all instances of the date ``July
1'' and adding in their place the date ``October 1''.
Dated: March 11, 2016.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-08368 Filed 4-8-16; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P