Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; APOQUEL, 21573-21574 [2016-08333]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2016 / Notices
Chemistry, regarding Review of
Carbadox Metabolism (September 7,
1994).
16. FDA, Freedom of Information (FOI)
Summary, NADA 041–061, MECADOX
10 (carbadox) Type A medicated article,
supplemental approval October 5, 1998.
Available at https://www.fda.gov/
AnimalVeterinary/Products/
ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/
FOIADrugSummaries/ucm064223.htm
(accessed on March 19, 2016).
17. FDA, Freedom of Information (FOI)
Summary, NADA 141–211, MECADOX
10 (carbadox) and TERRAMYCIN 50,
100, or 200 (oxytetracycline) in Type C
medicated feed, original approval July
21, 2004. Available at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/
AnimalVeterinary/Products/
ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/
FOIADrugSummaries/ucm118005.pdf
(accessed on March 19, 2016).
18. Codex Alimentarius Commission,
Twenty-Eighth Session, Headquarters,
Food and Agriculture Organization,
Rome, Italy, 2005.
19. FDA, CVM Guidance for Industry (GFI)
#205, VICH GL 46, ‘‘Studies to Evaluate
the Metabolism and Residue Kinetics of
Veterinary Drugs in Food-Producing
Animals: Metabolism Study to
Determine the Quantity and Identify the
Nature of Residues (MRK),’’ September
15, 2011. Available at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/
AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/UCM207939.pdf
(accessed on March 19, 2016).
20. MacIntosh, A.I., G. Lauriault, and G.A.
Neville, ‘‘Liquid Chromatographic
Monitoring of the Depletion of Carbadox
and its Metabolite Desoxycarbadox in
Swine Tissues,’’ Journal—Association of
Official Analytical Chemists, 68:665–71,
1985.
21. FDA, CVM Guidance for Industry (GFI)
#208, VICH GL 49, ‘‘Studies to Evaluate
the Metabolism and Residue Kinetics of
Veterinary Drugs in Food-Producing
Animals: Validation of Analytical
Methods Used in Residue Depletion
Studies,’’ September 15, 2011. Available
at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/UCM207942.pdf
(accessed on March 19, 2016).
22. FDA, Memorandum to the File,
Claycamp, H. G., Verification and
Extension of the 2003 JECFA Carbadox
Monograph Analyses, July 29, 2012.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Tracey Forfa,
Acting Director, Center for Veterinary
Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2016–08327 Filed 4–8–16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Apr 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–E–1222]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; APOQUEL
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
APOQUEL and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office (USPTO),
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
animal drug product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 13, 2016.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 11, 2016. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21573
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2014–E–1222 for ‘‘Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; APOQUEL.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
21574
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For animal drug
products, the testing phase begins on
the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated
for the drug or when an exemption
under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and
runs until the approval phase begins.
The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to
market the animal drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission
to market the drug product. Although
only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual
amount of extension that the Director of
USPTO may award (for example, half
the testing phase must be subtracted as
well as any time that may have occurred
before the patent was issued), FDA’s
determination of the length of a
regulatory review period for an animal
drug product will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as
specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
animal drug product APOQUEL
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Apr 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
(oclacitinib). APOQUEL is indicated for
control of pruritus associated with
allergic dermatitis and control of atopic
dermatitis in dogs at least 12 months of
age. Subsequent to this approval, the
USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for APOQUEL
(U.S. Patent No. 6,890,929) from Pfizer
Inc., and the USPTO requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated May 11, 2015, FDA
advised the USPTO that this animal
drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of APOQUEL represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Thereafter, the
USPTO requested that FDA determine
the product’s regulatory review period.
(see DATES). Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period. To meet its burden, the petition
must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1,
98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
APOQUEL is 2,226 days. Of this time,
2,172 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 54 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: April
12, 2007. FDA has verified the
applicant’s claim that the date the
investigational new animal drug
application (INAD) became effective
was on April 12, 2007.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section 512
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360b): March
22, 2013. FDA has verified the
applicant’s claim that the new animal
drug application (NADA) for APOQUEL
(NADA 141–345) was submitted on
March 22, 2013.
3. The date the application was
approved: May 14, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 141–345 was approved on May
14, 2013.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,139 days of patent
term extension.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and ask for a redetermination
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2016–08333 Filed 4–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–E–2337]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; APTIOM
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
APTIOM and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 13, 2016.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 11, 2016. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21573-21574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08333]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2014-E-1222]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; APOQUEL
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for APOQUEL and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that animal drug product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by June
13, 2016. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with
due diligence during the regulatory review period by October 11, 2016.
See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more
information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2014-E-1222 for ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; APOQUEL.'' Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access
[[Page 21574]]
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For animal drug products, the
testing phase begins on the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated for the drug or when an
exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the animal drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of USPTO may award
(for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for an animal
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the animal drug product APOQUEL
(oclacitinib). APOQUEL is indicated for control of pruritus associated
with allergic dermatitis and control of atopic dermatitis in dogs at
least 12 months of age. Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received
a patent term restoration application for APOQUEL (U.S. Patent No.
6,890,929) from Pfizer Inc., and the USPTO requested FDA's assistance
in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration.
In a letter dated May 11, 2015, FDA advised the USPTO that this animal
drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the
approval of APOQUEL represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that
FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
APOQUEL is 2,226 days. Of this time, 2,172 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 54 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became
effective: April 12, 2007. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that
the date the investigational new animal drug application (INAD) became
effective was on April 12, 2007.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the animal drug product under section 512 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360b): March 22, 2013. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the
new animal drug application (NADA) for APOQUEL (NADA 141-345) was
submitted on March 22, 2013.
3. The date the application was approved: May 14, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NADA 141-345 was approved on May
14, 2013.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,139 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and ask for
a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-08333 Filed 4-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P