Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits, 21320-21321 [2016-08256]
Download as PDF
21320
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2016 / Notices
concerning our finding of no shipments
by these 11 companies. In these final
results of review, we continue to
determine that these 11 companies had
no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication date of these final results of
review. We intend to instruct CBP to
liquidate POR entries of subject
merchandise from the seven companies,
including Shanghai Jian Pu, which
failed to establish their eligibility for
separate rate status at the rate applicable
to the PRC-wide entity. For the 11
companies which the Department
determined had no shipments during
the POR, all suspended entries under
any of those companies’ antidumping
case numbers will be liquidated at the
assessment rate for the PRC-wide
entity.8
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date in the Federal Register of the final
results of review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters which are not
under review in this segment of the
proceeding but which have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the existing exporter-specific rate;
(2) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate,
including Shanghai Jian Pu and the six
companies noted above, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCwide entity, which is 216.01 percent; (3)
for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
These final results of review are
issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: April 1, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Treatment of Shanghai Jian Pu
Import & Export Co. Ltd.
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–08233 Filed 4–8–16; 8:45 am]
Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific &
Educational Equipment Co., Ltd.
8 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Apr 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE552
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has
made a preliminary determination that
an Exempted Fishing Permit application
submitted by The Nature Conservancy
contains all of the required information
and warrants further consideration. This
Exempted Fishing Permit would allow
participants to use electronic
monitoring systems in lieu of at-sea
monitors in support of a study to
develop electronic monitoring for the
purposes of catch monitoring in the
groundfish fishery.
Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of
this notification to provide interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed Exempted
Fishing Permits.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by any of the following
methods:
• Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line ‘‘TNC EM
EFP.’’
• Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope ‘‘TNC
EM EFP.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Alger, Groundfish Sector Policy
Analyst, 978–675–2153.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2010,
NMFS implemented Amendment 16 to
the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), which revised
and expanded the sector management
system and established annual catch
limits and accountability measures for
each stock in the fishery. In order to
reliably estimate sector catch and
monitor sector operations, Amendment
16 included new requirements for
groundfish sectors to implement and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2016 / Notices
fund an at-sea monitoring (ASM)
program. Amendment 16 also included
a provision that allows electronic
monitoring (EM) to be used to satisfy
this monitoring requirement, provided
NMFS deems the technology sufficient
for the purposes of catch accounting.
There are likely different visions for
what an EM system entails, but
generally EM incorporates video
cameras, sensors, and electronic
reporting systems into a vessel’s fishing
operations. Depending on the program
design, EM has the potential to reduce
the expenses associated with monitoring
groundfish sectors, and, at the same
time, increase accountability and
monitoring in the fishery. However,
moving away from human observers has
its trade-offs; the types and quality of
data can be different between EM and
ASMs. Simply stated, EM may be a
suitable replacement to ASM, provided
EM has the ability to identify species,
and verify weights and counts of
discards in the groundfish fishery.
For the groundfish fishery, the
program designs being considered are
the ‘‘audit model’’ and the ‘‘maximized
retention model.’’ The audit model
would use EM to verify discards
reported by a captain on a vessel trip
report. Under the maximized retention
model, vessels would be required to
retain most fish species (e.g., allocated
groundfish stocks), be allowed to
discard others (e.g., protected species),
and EM would be used to ensure
compliance with discarding regulations.
NMFS has not yet approved EM as a
suitable alternative to ASM for the
groundfish fishery. However, there have
been several efforts in recent years to
develop EM as a monitoring tool in the
fishery.
NMFS has been collaborating with
The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the Gulf
of Maine Research Institute, the Maine
Coast Fishermen’s Association, the Cape
Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance,
and Ecotrust Canada to implement a
program that uses EM for monitoring in
the groundfish fishery. NMFS has been
building database infrastructure and
processing tools for data collected from
EM video footage, conducting
comparative analysis to the existing
catch monitoring systems in the fishery,
and addressing additional legal and
logistical hurdles. However, there are
some challenges that remain that will
require additional EM data and analysis
to resolve. For example, an EM program
must specify how much video needs to
be reviewed to satisfy the monitoring
objectives, and best practices need to be
developed for species that are difficult
to identify using EM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Apr 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
To further examine these issues and
develop EM, TNC submitted a complete
application for an EFP on March 17,
2016, to enable data collection activities
and catch monitoring that the
regulations on commercial fishing
would otherwise restrict. The EFP
would support an EM study intended to
improve the functionality of EM
systems, optimize fish handling
protocols by participating fishermen,
and continue development of EM as a
monitoring tool for the groundfish
fishery. Results of this study would be
used to inform the approval and
implementation of EM in the fishery.
The EFP would exempt participating
vessels from adhering to its sector’s
monitoring plan, which requires the
deployment of ASMs on sector trips
selected for ASM coverage. While
participating in the EM study, vessels
would use EM to replace ASMs when
selected for ASM coverage. EM would
not replace Northeast Fishery Observer
Program (NEFOP) observers.
Approximately 20 sector vessels would
participate in this project, including
participants from the Georges Bank Cod
Fixed Gear Sector, the Maine Coast
Community Sector, the Northeast
Fishery Sector 11, and possibly
additional sectors as well.
Under the EFP, vessels would declare
sector trips in the Pre-Trip Notification
System, as required by the FMP.
However, if selected for ASM coverage,
the vessel would be issued an ASM
waiver and instead be required to turn
on the EM system for the entire fishing
trip. If selected for NEFOP coverage, the
vessel would fish with a NEFOP
observer and would also turn on the EM
system for the entire trip. A third-party
provider would review 100 percent of
the video from each EM trip, and NMFS
would audit the provider(s) to verify the
accuracy of the EM data collected. For
sector monitoring, NMFS uses a
combination of the discard data
collected from NEFOP observers and
ASMs to estimate discards. For vessels
participating in this EFP, NMFS would
use the EM data collected in place of the
ASM data. All other catch monitoring
under the EFP would be consistent with
standard sector monitoring, such as
using dealer-reported landings and
vessel trip reports.
Across all participants, TNC expects
approximately 900 total trips
throughout the 2016 fishing year. If the
target observer coverage was set at 14
percent, as proposed in Framework
Adjustment 55 to the NE Multispecies
FMP, this would result in
approximately 126 EM trips. Some of
these trips would have a NEFOP
observer onboard as well.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21321
All catch of groundfish stocks
allocated to sectors by vessels would be
deducted from the sector’s annual catch
entitlement for each NE multispecies
stock. Legal-sized regulated groundfish
would be retained and landed, as
required by the FMP. Undersized
groundfish would be handled according
to the EM project guidelines in view of
cameras and returned to the sea as
quickly as possible. All other species
would be handled per normal
commercial fishing operations. No legalsize regulated groundfish would be
discarded, unless otherwise permitted
through regulatory exemptions granted
to the participating vessel’s sector.
If approved, the applicant may
request minor modifications and
extensions to the EFP throughout the
year. EFP modifications and extensions
may be granted without further notice if
they are deemed essential to facilitate
completion of the proposed research
and have minimal impacts that do not
change the scope or impact of the
initially approved EFP request. Any
fishing activity conducted outside the
scope of the exempted fishing activity
would be prohibited.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–08256 Filed 4–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE536
Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee
Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open public meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
proposed schedule and agenda of a
forthcoming meeting of the Marine
Fisheries Advisory Committee
(MAFAC). The members will discuss
and provide advice on issues outlined
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
below.
DATES: The meeting will be held April
25–27, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Hotel Monaco Portland, 506 SW.
Washington Street, Portland, OR 97204;
503–222–0001.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21320-21321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08256]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE552
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable
Fisheries, Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has made a preliminary
determination that an Exempted Fishing Permit application submitted by
The Nature Conservancy contains all of the required information and
warrants further consideration. This Exempted Fishing Permit would
allow participants to use electronic monitoring systems in lieu of at-
sea monitors in support of a study to develop electronic monitoring for
the purposes of catch monitoring in the groundfish fishery.
Regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of this notification to provide
interested parties the opportunity to comment on applications for
proposed Exempted Fishing Permits.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 26, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments by any of the following
methods:
Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line
``TNC EM EFP.''
Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope ``TNC EM EFP.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Alger, Groundfish Sector Policy
Analyst, 978-675-2153.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2010, NMFS implemented Amendment 16 to
the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (FMP), which
revised and expanded the sector management system and established
annual catch limits and accountability measures for each stock in the
fishery. In order to reliably estimate sector catch and monitor sector
operations, Amendment 16 included new requirements for groundfish
sectors to implement and
[[Page 21321]]
fund an at-sea monitoring (ASM) program. Amendment 16 also included a
provision that allows electronic monitoring (EM) to be used to satisfy
this monitoring requirement, provided NMFS deems the technology
sufficient for the purposes of catch accounting. There are likely
different visions for what an EM system entails, but generally EM
incorporates video cameras, sensors, and electronic reporting systems
into a vessel's fishing operations. Depending on the program design, EM
has the potential to reduce the expenses associated with monitoring
groundfish sectors, and, at the same time, increase accountability and
monitoring in the fishery. However, moving away from human observers
has its trade-offs; the types and quality of data can be different
between EM and ASMs. Simply stated, EM may be a suitable replacement to
ASM, provided EM has the ability to identify species, and verify
weights and counts of discards in the groundfish fishery.
For the groundfish fishery, the program designs being considered
are the ``audit model'' and the ``maximized retention model.'' The
audit model would use EM to verify discards reported by a captain on a
vessel trip report. Under the maximized retention model, vessels would
be required to retain most fish species (e.g., allocated groundfish
stocks), be allowed to discard others (e.g., protected species), and EM
would be used to ensure compliance with discarding regulations. NMFS
has not yet approved EM as a suitable alternative to ASM for the
groundfish fishery. However, there have been several efforts in recent
years to develop EM as a monitoring tool in the fishery.
NMFS has been collaborating with The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the
Gulf of Maine Research Institute, the Maine Coast Fishermen's
Association, the Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen's Alliance, and Ecotrust
Canada to implement a program that uses EM for monitoring in the
groundfish fishery. NMFS has been building database infrastructure and
processing tools for data collected from EM video footage, conducting
comparative analysis to the existing catch monitoring systems in the
fishery, and addressing additional legal and logistical hurdles.
However, there are some challenges that remain that will require
additional EM data and analysis to resolve. For example, an EM program
must specify how much video needs to be reviewed to satisfy the
monitoring objectives, and best practices need to be developed for
species that are difficult to identify using EM.
To further examine these issues and develop EM, TNC submitted a
complete application for an EFP on March 17, 2016, to enable data
collection activities and catch monitoring that the regulations on
commercial fishing would otherwise restrict. The EFP would support an
EM study intended to improve the functionality of EM systems, optimize
fish handling protocols by participating fishermen, and continue
development of EM as a monitoring tool for the groundfish fishery.
Results of this study would be used to inform the approval and
implementation of EM in the fishery.
The EFP would exempt participating vessels from adhering to its
sector's monitoring plan, which requires the deployment of ASMs on
sector trips selected for ASM coverage. While participating in the EM
study, vessels would use EM to replace ASMs when selected for ASM
coverage. EM would not replace Northeast Fishery Observer Program
(NEFOP) observers. Approximately 20 sector vessels would participate in
this project, including participants from the Georges Bank Cod Fixed
Gear Sector, the Maine Coast Community Sector, the Northeast Fishery
Sector 11, and possibly additional sectors as well.
Under the EFP, vessels would declare sector trips in the Pre-Trip
Notification System, as required by the FMP. However, if selected for
ASM coverage, the vessel would be issued an ASM waiver and instead be
required to turn on the EM system for the entire fishing trip. If
selected for NEFOP coverage, the vessel would fish with a NEFOP
observer and would also turn on the EM system for the entire trip. A
third-party provider would review 100 percent of the video from each EM
trip, and NMFS would audit the provider(s) to verify the accuracy of
the EM data collected. For sector monitoring, NMFS uses a combination
of the discard data collected from NEFOP observers and ASMs to estimate
discards. For vessels participating in this EFP, NMFS would use the EM
data collected in place of the ASM data. All other catch monitoring
under the EFP would be consistent with standard sector monitoring, such
as using dealer-reported landings and vessel trip reports.
Across all participants, TNC expects approximately 900 total trips
throughout the 2016 fishing year. If the target observer coverage was
set at 14 percent, as proposed in Framework Adjustment 55 to the NE
Multispecies FMP, this would result in approximately 126 EM trips. Some
of these trips would have a NEFOP observer onboard as well.
All catch of groundfish stocks allocated to sectors by vessels
would be deducted from the sector's annual catch entitlement for each
NE multispecies stock. Legal-sized regulated groundfish would be
retained and landed, as required by the FMP. Undersized groundfish
would be handled according to the EM project guidelines in view of
cameras and returned to the sea as quickly as possible. All other
species would be handled per normal commercial fishing operations. No
legal-size regulated groundfish would be discarded, unless otherwise
permitted through regulatory exemptions granted to the participating
vessel's sector.
If approved, the applicant may request minor modifications and
extensions to the EFP throughout the year. EFP modifications and
extensions may be granted without further notice if they are deemed
essential to facilitate completion of the proposed research and have
minimal impacts that do not change the scope or impact of the initially
approved EFP request. Any fishing activity conducted outside the scope
of the exempted fishing activity would be prohibited.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 6, 2016.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-08256 Filed 4-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P