Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions, 20598-20600 [2016-08159]

Download as PDF 20598 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules TABLE 2 OF § 165.801—SECTOR UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ANNUAL AND RECURRING SAFETY ZONES—Continued Date Sponsor/name 36. 1 day—4th of July weekend ...................... City of Stillwater/St. Croix Events/Stillwater 4th of July. Riverside Chamber of Commerce/Riverfest. St. Croix Events/Lumberjack Days. Lake of the Ozarks Shootout, Inc./Lake of the Ozarks Shootout. City of Keithsburg/ Keithsburg Fireworks Display. City of East Moline/ City of East Moline Fireworks. Lansing Lion’s Club/ Lansing Fish Days Fireworks. River Action/Floatzilla 37. 2 days—3rd weekend of September ......... 38. 4 days—3rd week of July .......................... 39. 2 days—Weekend that precedes Labor Day Weekend. 40. 2 days—1st weekend of September .......... 41. 1 day—4th of July weekend ...................... 42. 2nd Weekend in August ............................. 43. 3rd Weekend in August ............................. 44. 1 day—Weekend before Thanksgiving ...... 45. 2 days—A weekend in September ............ 46. 1 day—4th of July weekend ...................... * * * * Main Street Parkway Association/Parkville Christmas on the River. St. Louis Drag Boat Association/New Athens Drag Boat Race. City of Marquette/Marquette Independence Day Celebration. Sector Upper Mississippi River location Stillwater, MN ............. St. Croix River mile marker 022.9 to 023.5 (Minnesota). Riverside, MO ............ Missouri River mile marker 371.8 to 372.2. Stillwater, MN ............. St. Croix River mile marker 022.9 to 023.5 (Minnesota). Lake of the Ozarks mile marker 032.5 to 034.5. Lake of the Ozarks, MO. Keithsburg, IL ............. Upper Mississippi River mile marker 427.5 to 427.3. East Moline, IA ........... Upper Mississippi River mile marker 490.2 to 489.8. Lansing, IA ................. Upper Mississippi River mile marker 662.8– 663.9. Rock Island, Illinois .... Parkville, MO .............. Upper Mississippi River mile marker 479.0– 486.0. Missouri River mile marker 377.5 to 378.0. New Athens, IL ........... Kaskaskia River mile marker 119.7 to 120.3. Marquette, IA .............. Upper Mississippi River mile marker 634.2 to 635.7. Pennsylvania. This SIP revision amends two regulations to clarify testing and sampling methods for stationary sources of particulate matter (PM) and add the requirement to measure and report filterable and condensable PM. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). * Dated: April 4, 2016. M. L. Malloy, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River. [FR Doc. 2016–07997 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Written comments must be received on or before May 9, 2016. DATES: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS [EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0005; FRL–9944–72– Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:31 Apr 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA– R03–OAR–2016–0005 at https:// www.regulations.gov, or via email to fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. ADDRESSES: 40 CFR Part 52 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Safety zone Sfmt 4702 The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria A. Pino, (215) 814–2181, or by email at pino.maria@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background PM, also known as particle pollution, is a complex mixture of extremely small particles and liquid droplets. Particle pollution is made up of a number of components, including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM 08APP1 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. EPA is concerned about particles that are 10 micrometers in diameter or smaller, because those are the particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects. EPA established the first national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for coarse particles (PM10), which are particles less than 10 microns in diameter, on July 1, 1987. 52 FR 24634. The rules established primary (health based) and secondary (welfare based) PM10 standards for short term (24-hour) and long term (annual) exposures to PM. The 24-hour standards were set at 150 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3), not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a 3-year period. The annual standards were set at 50 mg/m3, based on a three-year average annual arithmetic mean. On July 18, 1997, EPA established the first NAAQS for particles less than 2.5 microns in diameter, known as fine particulate (PM2.5). 62 FR 38652. EPA set an annual primary and secondary standards at 15 mg/m3, based on a three-year average of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations and 24-hour primary and secondary standards at 65 mg/m3, based on a threeyear average of the 98th percentile of 24hour concentrations. EPA revised the PM2.5 NAAQS on October 17, 2006, lowering the primary and secondary 24hour NAAQS from 65 mg/m3 to 35 mg/ m3. 71 FR 61144. In that rule, EPA retained the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS, and revoked the annual PM10 standard. On December 14, 2012, EPA once again revised the PM2.5 NAAQS, lowering the level of the health based primary annual standard from 15 to 12 mg/m3, while retaining the welfare based secondary annual standard at 15 mg/m3. That rule also retained the 24-hour PM2.5 standard at a level of 35 mg/m3. On December 1, 2010, EPA revised two test methods for measuring PM emissions from stationary sources. 75 FR 80118. One of the revised methods, called Method 201A, provides the capability to measure the mass of filterable PM2.5. The second revised method, called Method 202, makes measurement of condensable PM more accurate. Condensable PM forms from condensing gases or vapors. It is a common component of both PM10 and PM2.5. The combination of Methods 201A and 202 helps EPA and states to develop more accurate primary PM emissions inventories, determine whether stationary sources are major sources of PM10 or PM2.5 emissions for VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:31 Apr 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 the New Source Review (NSR)/ Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program or the Title V Permit program, determine more accurately the effectiveness of control devices for PM10 or PM2.5, develop regulatory limits with more appropriate test methods, and determine compliance with regulatory limits with greater accuracy. See 40 CFR part 51 appendix M and 75 FR 80118 (December 21, 2010). II. Summary of SIP Revision On June 25, 2015, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania submitted a formal SIP revision that amends chapters 121 and 139 of title 25, Environmental Protection, of the Pennsylvania Code (25 Pa. Code). Methods 201A and 202 are incorporated by reference in Pennsylvania’s Source Testing Manual, which is incorporated by reference in 25 Pa. Code, chapter 139, Sampling and Testing. Amendments to chapter 121, in section 121.1, add definitions for the terms ‘‘condensable particulate matter’’ and ‘‘filterable particulate matter.’’ The amendments to 25 Pa. Code section 139.12 explain the process for determining compliance with filterable and condensable PM emission limitations, and explains the compliance demonstration process. Under 25 Pa. Code section 139.12(b), the owner or operator of a stationary source subject to PM emission limitations or to NSR/PSD applicability determinations is required to demonstrate compliance for filterable and condensable PM emissions. The amendment to 25 Pa. Code section 139.53 specifies to whom monitoring reports must be submitted. III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the June 25, 2015 Pennsylvania SIP revision, which amends specific provisions within chapters 121 and 139 of 25 Pa. Code. The amendments clarify testing and sampling methods and reporting requirements for stationary sources of PM and add the requirement to measure and report filterable and condensable PM. This revision meets requirements in section 110 of the CAA and strengthens the Pennsylvania SIP. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this proposed rulemaking action, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule, regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the revised PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 20599 Pennsylvania regulations, published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, Vol. 44 No. 15, April 12, 2014, and effective on April 12, 2014. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM 08APP1 20600 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rulemaking action, proposing to approve amendments to Pennsylvania’s regulations regarding testing and sampling methods for stationary sources of PM, including filterable and condensable PM, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the Commonwealth, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 24, 2016 Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator Region III. [FR Doc. 2016–08159 Filed 4–7–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0072; FRL–9944–53– Region 4] Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Prong 4–2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve portions of revisions to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR), addressing the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) visibility transport (prong 4) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), and 2012 annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by EPA, commonly referred to as an ‘‘infrastructure SIP.’’ Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve the prong 4 portions of North Carolina’s November 2, 2012, 2008 8- asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:31 Apr 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 hour Ozone infrastructure SIP submission; August 23, 2013, 2010 1hour NO2 infrastructure SIP submission; March 18, 2014, 2010 1-hour SO2 infrastructure SIP submission; and December 4, 2015, 2012 annual PM2.5 infrastructure SIP submission. All other applicable infrastructure requirements for these SIP submissions have been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 29, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No EPA–R04– OAR–2016–0072 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman of the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Lakeman can be reached by telephone at (404) 562–9043 or via electronic mail at lakeman.sean@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background By statute, SIPs meeting the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA are to be submitted by states within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS to provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the new or revised NAAQS. EPA has historically referred to these SIP submissions made for the purpose of satisfying the requirements PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 of sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) as ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ submissions. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIP elements such as for monitoring, basic program requirements, and legal authority that are designed to assure attainment and maintenance of the newly established or revised NAAQS. More specifically, section 110(a)(1) provides the procedural and timing requirements for infrastructure SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific elements that states must meet for the infrastructure SIP requirements related to a newly established or revised NAAQS. The contents of an infrastructure SIP submission may vary depending upon the data and analytical tools available to the state, as well as the provisions already contained in the state’s implementation plan at the time in which the state develops and submits the submission for a new or revised NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2)(D) has two components: 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) includes four distinct components, commonly referred to as ‘‘prongs,’’ that must be addressed in infrastructure SIP submissions. The first two prongs, which are codified in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), are provisions that prohibit any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS in another state (prong 1) and from interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in another state (prong 2). The third and fourth prongs, which are codified in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), are provisions that prohibit emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in another state (prong 3) or from interfering with measures to protect visibility in another state (prong 4). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires SIPs to include provisions ensuring compliance with sections 115 and 126 of the Act, relating to interstate and international pollution abatement. Through this action, EPA is proposing to approve the prong 4 portions of North Carolina’s infrastructure SIP submissions for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour NO2, 2010 1-hour SO2, and 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS as discussed in section IV of this document. All other applicable infrastructure SIP requirements for these SIP submissions have been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings. A brief background regarding the NAAQS relevant to this proposal is provided below. For comprehensive information on these NAAQS, please refer to the E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM 08APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20598-20600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0005; FRL-9944-72-Region 3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate 
Matter Emissions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This SIP revision amends two regulations 
to clarify testing and sampling methods for stationary sources of 
particulate matter (PM) and add the requirement to measure and report 
filterable and condensable PM. This action is being taken under the 
Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 9, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2016-0005 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria A. Pino, (215) 814-2181, or by 
email at pino.maria@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    PM, also known as particle pollution, is a complex mixture of 
extremely small particles and liquid droplets. Particle pollution is 
made up of a number of components, including acids (such as nitrates 
and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. 
The

[[Page 20599]]

size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing 
health problems. EPA is concerned about particles that are 10 
micrometers in diameter or smaller, because those are the particles 
that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. 
Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause 
serious health effects.
    EPA established the first national ambient air quality standard 
(NAAQS) for coarse particles (PM10), which are particles 
less than 10 microns in diameter, on July 1, 1987. 52 FR 24634. The 
rules established primary (health based) and secondary (welfare based) 
PM10 standards for short term (24-hour) and long term 
(annual) exposures to PM. The 24-hour standards were set at 150 
micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\), not to be exceeded more 
than once per year on average over a 3-year period. The annual 
standards were set at 50 [micro]g/m\3\, based on a three-year average 
annual arithmetic mean. On July 18, 1997, EPA established the first 
NAAQS for particles less than 2.5 microns in diameter, known as fine 
particulate (PM2.5). 62 FR 38652. EPA set an annual primary 
and secondary standards at 15 [micro]g/m\3\, based on a three-year 
average of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations and 24-hour 
primary and secondary standards at 65 [micro]g/m\3\, based on a three-
year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations. EPA 
revised the PM2.5 NAAQS on October 17, 2006, lowering the 
primary and secondary 24-hour NAAQS from 65 [micro]g/m\3\ to 35 
[micro]g/m\3\. 71 FR 61144. In that rule, EPA retained the 24-hour 
PM10 NAAQS, and revoked the annual PM10 standard. 
On December 14, 2012, EPA once again revised the PM2.5 
NAAQS, lowering the level of the health based primary annual standard 
from 15 to 12 [micro]g/m\3\, while retaining the welfare based 
secondary annual standard at 15 [micro]g/m\3\. That rule also retained 
the 24-hour PM2.5 standard at a level of 35 [micro]g/m\3\.
    On December 1, 2010, EPA revised two test methods for measuring PM 
emissions from stationary sources. 75 FR 80118. One of the revised 
methods, called Method 201A, provides the capability to measure the 
mass of filterable PM2.5. The second revised method, called 
Method 202, makes measurement of condensable PM more accurate. 
Condensable PM forms from condensing gases or vapors. It is a common 
component of both PM10 and PM2.5. The combination 
of Methods 201A and 202 helps EPA and states to develop more accurate 
primary PM emissions inventories, determine whether stationary sources 
are major sources of PM10 or PM2.5 emissions for 
the New Source Review (NSR)/Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
(PSD) program or the Title V Permit program, determine more accurately 
the effectiveness of control devices for PM10 or 
PM2.5, develop regulatory limits with more appropriate test 
methods, and determine compliance with regulatory limits with greater 
accuracy. See 40 CFR part 51 appendix M and 75 FR 80118 (December 21, 
2010).

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    On June 25, 2015, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania submitted a 
formal SIP revision that amends chapters 121 and 139 of title 25, 
Environmental Protection, of the Pennsylvania Code (25 Pa. Code). 
Methods 201A and 202 are incorporated by reference in Pennsylvania's 
Source Testing Manual, which is incorporated by reference in 25 Pa. 
Code, chapter 139, Sampling and Testing. Amendments to chapter 121, in 
section 121.1, add definitions for the terms ``condensable particulate 
matter'' and ``filterable particulate matter.'' The amendments to 25 
Pa. Code section 139.12 explain the process for determining compliance 
with filterable and condensable PM emission limitations, and explains 
the compliance demonstration process. Under 25 Pa. Code section 
139.12(b), the owner or operator of a stationary source subject to PM 
emission limitations or to NSR/PSD applicability determinations is 
required to demonstrate compliance for filterable and condensable PM 
emissions. The amendment to 25 Pa. Code section 139.53 specifies to 
whom monitoring reports must be submitted.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the June 25, 2015 Pennsylvania SIP 
revision, which amends specific provisions within chapters 121 and 139 
of 25 Pa. Code. The amendments clarify testing and sampling methods and 
reporting requirements for stationary sources of PM and add the 
requirement to measure and report filterable and condensable PM. This 
revision meets requirements in section 110 of the CAA and strengthens 
the Pennsylvania SIP. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues 
discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before 
taking final action.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this proposed rulemaking action, EPA is proposing to include in 
a final EPA rule, regulatory text that includes incorporation by 
reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is 
proposing to incorporate by reference the revised Pennsylvania 
regulations, published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, Vol. 44 No. 15, 
April 12, 2014, and effective on April 12, 2014. EPA has made, and will 
continue to make, these documents generally available electronically 
through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA 
office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more 
information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible

[[Page 20600]]

methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rulemaking action, proposing to approve 
amendments to Pennsylvania's regulations regarding testing and sampling 
methods for stationary sources of PM, including filterable and 
condensable PM, does not have tribal implications as specified by 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP 
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the Commonwealth, 
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on 
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.o

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: March 24, 2016
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-08159 Filed 4-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.