Notice of the Redesignation of the Service Delivery Area for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), 20388-20395 [2016-07951]
Download as PDF
20388
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN—HOURS
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Average
annualized
burden per
response
(hours)
Annualized
total burden
(hours)
Type of respondent
Form name
Grantees ............................................
FPAR ...............................................
93 grantees
1
36
3,348
Totals ..........................................
..........................................................
93
........................
........................
3,348
OS specifically requests comments on
(1) the necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions, (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
Darius Taylor,
Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–07964 Filed 4–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Notice of the Redesignation of the
Service Delivery Area for the
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah)
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Indian Health Service.
Final notice.
This final notice advises the
public that the Indian Health Service
(IHS) has decided to expand the
geographic boundaries of the
Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) service
delivery area for the Wampanoag Tribe
of Gay Head (Aquinnah) of
Massachusetts pursuant to 42 CFR
136.22. The Aquinnah service delivery
area previously covered Martha’s
Vineyard, Dukes County in the State of
Massachusetts. The expanded service
delivery area includes counties of
Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth,
Suffolk, and Dukes Counties in the State
of Massachusetts. The sole purpose of
this expansion is to authorize Aquinnah
to cover additional tribal members and
beneficiaries under Aquinnah’s PRC
program using the existing Federal
allocation for PRC funds.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
The effective date of expansion
will be 60 days from the date of this
notice.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, Office of
Resource Access and Partnerships,
Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Mailstop 10E85C, Rockville,
Maryland 20857. Telephone (301) 443–
2694 (This is not a toll free number).
Background: The Indian Health
Service (IHS) currently provides
services under regulations codified at 42
CFR part 136, subparts A through C.
Subpart C defines a Contract Health
Service Delivery Area (CHSDA), now
referred to as a Purchased/Referred Care
(PRC) service delivery area, as the
geographic area within which PRC will
be made available by the IHS to
members of an identified Indian
community who reside in the area.
Residence in a PRC service delivery area
by a person who is within the scope of
the Indian health program, as set forth
in 42 CFR 136.12, creates no legal
entitlement to PRC but only potential
eligibility for services. Services needed
but not available at an IHS/Tribal
facility are provided under the PRC
program depending on the availability
of funds, the person’s relative medical
priority, and the actual availability and
accessibility of alternate resources in
accordance with the regulations.
As applicable to the Tribes, these
regulations provide that, unless
otherwise designated, a PRC service
delivery area shall consist of a county
which includes all or part of a
reservation and any county or counties
which have a common boundary with
the reservation. 42 CFR 136.22(a)(6).
The regulations also provide that after
consultation with the Tribal governing
body or bodies on those reservations
included within the PRC service
delivery area, the Secretary may from
time to time, redesignate areas within
the United States for inclusion in or
exclusion from a PRC service delivery
area. The regulations require that certain
criteria must be considered before any
redesignation is made. The criteria are
as follows:
(1) The number of Indians residing in
the area proposed to be so included or
excluded;
(2) Whether the Tribal governing body
has determined that Indians residing in
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the area near the reservation are socially
and economically affiliated with the
tribe;
(3) The geographic proximity to the
reservation of the area whose inclusion
or exclusion is being considered; and
(4) The level of funding which would
be available for the provision of PRC.
Additionally, the regulations require
that any redesignation of a PRC service
delivery area must be made in
accordance with the Administrative
Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). In
compliance with this requirement, IHS
published a proposed notice of
redesignation and requested public
comments on August 24, 2015 (80 FR
51281). Aquinnah requested that IHS
expand the Aquinnah service delivery
area to include Barnstable, Bristol,
Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk Counties
in the State of Massachusetts.
In support of this expansion, IHS
adopts the following findings of the
Aquinnah Tribe:
(1) By expanding, the Tribe’s
estimated current eligible population
will be increased by 268.
(2) The Tribe has determined these
268 individuals are socially and
economically affiliated with the Tribe.
(3) The expanded area including
Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth,
and Suffolk Counties in the State of
Massachusetts are across the Bay from
Martha’s Vineyard, Dukes County,
Massachusetts.
(4) The Tribal members located in
these counties currently do not use the
Indian health system for their health
care needs.
Aquinnah will use its existing Federal
allocation for PRC funds to provide
services to the expanded population. No
additional financial resources will be
allocated by IHS to Aquinnah to provide
services to its members residing in these
counties nor should this expansion be
construed to have any present or future
effect on the allocation of resources
between the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
and Aquinnah.
Public Comments: The Agency only
received comments from the Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe (Mashpee). Mashpee
incorporated several letters into its
submission. Through these comments
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
and letters, Mashpee indicated that it
does not support the proposed
redesignation and articulated several
objections to the expansion, which IHS
addresses below:
Comment: IHS has failed to meet its
legal requirement to meaningfully
consult with the Mashpee Tribe as the
only other Tribal governing body within
the proposed redesignated SDA in
accordance with 42 CFR 136.22(b).
Response: IHS disagrees. IHS
consulted with the Mashpee Tribe
regarding this proposed expansion. As
Mashpee noted in its own submission,
IHS engaged in government-togovernment discussions and
correspondence on this issue. IHS
provided its answers to the Mashpee
Tribe’s questions in a letter from Deputy
Director McSwain to Mashpee Chairman
Cromwell, dated October 5, 2015. While
Mashpee questions the adequacy of
IHS’s answers, they nonetheless
demonstrate that IHS has engaged in
meaningful consultation with Mashpee
with respect to this expansion.
Additionally, the opportunity to submit
comments on a proposed notice is a
form of consultation. IHS recognizes
that Mashpee has concerns with the
expansion and does not support the IHS
decisions in this regard. IHS is not
required, after consultation with a Tribe,
to adopt the specific position of the
Mashpee Tribe.
Comment: IHS has no legal authority
to contravene the clear legal mandate of
the Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay
Head, Inc., Indian Claims Settlement
Act of 1987.
Response: IHS agrees with the
Mashpee Tribe that the Agency cannot
contravene the Settlement Act, but the
Agency does not believe the expansion
is prohibited by the Settlement Act. It is
HHS’s understanding that the
Settlement Act is not implemented by
Department of the Interior (DOI) as a
limitation for DOI programs and
services. Accordingly, after conferring
with DOI regarding its position, IHS has
decided to revisit the expansion issue.
The establishment of PRC service
delivery areas is an administrative
function of IHS, governed by the
regulations at 42 CFR 136.22.
Historically, IHS has established service
delivery areas in accordance with our
understanding of Congressional intent,
for example as evidenced by
geographically designated areas
identified in settlement acts, such as
Public Law 100–95. IHS does not intend
to abandon that practice. Under PRC
regulations, however, IHS has preserved
flexibility to redesignate areas as
appropriate for inclusion in or exclusion
from PRC service delivery. One of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
criteria for such redesignations is the
geographic proximity of the expanded
area to the existing reservation or
service delivery area. In the few
circumstances where it has arisen, IHS
has aligned geographic proximity with
Congressional findings of ‘‘on or near’’.
Here, IHS proposed to expand a PRC
delivery area beyond the geographic
description of ‘‘on or near’’ that
Congress set forth in a settlement or
recognition act. IHS offered stakeholders
the opportunity to comment on the
departure from historic practice by
issuing a notice of proposed expansion
prior to issuing a final notice to
ascertain whether the departure is
disruptive to tribes that have previously
relied on IHS’s historic practice. IHS did
not receive comments that identify a
detrimental reliance interest.
Accordingly, when considering the
geographic proximity of the proposed
expansion area under 42 CFR 136.22 to
the existing reservation (or service
delivery area), IHS will no longer rigidly
apply a Congressional finding of ‘‘on or
near’’ as prohibiting PRC delivery area
expansion in considering expansion
requests. Although this is a change in
the implementation of the redesignation
authority found at 42 CFR 136.22, no
change is necessary to the text of the
regulation itself.
In making this change, however, IHS
notes that Congress has, at times,
statutorily enacted PRC service delivery
areas for some tribes or for entire States.
See, e.g. 25 U.S.C. 1678 (designating the
entire State of Arizona). Those
enactments may limit changes in PRC
delivery area boundaries in some
circumstances. Congress did not
specifically establish a PRC service
delivery area for Aquinnah in the
Settlement Act; IHS administratively
established this area through its
regulations. While IHS chose to
establish and limit the Aquinnah PRC
service delivery area consistent with the
language of the Act, in keeping with our
current understanding of DOI practices,
the language of the Act does not have to
be read as preventing IHS from
exercising its administrative discretion
to expand or reduce that initially
established area going forward. Indeed,
IHS has already interpreted its authority
to permit the establishment of PRC
service delivery areas that go beyond
what may otherwise be considered ‘‘on
or near’’ a reservation. For example, IHS
has administratively designated entire
states as PRC service delivery areas,
even though all parts of such states were
not necessarily ‘‘on or near’’ a
reservation. Nor does there appear to be
any legislative history of the Act that
would suggest that Congress intended
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20389
the language of Section 1771 to be a
limitation on IHS programs or
administrative flexibility. There is also
no evidence to suggest that Congress
intended to limit eligibility for PRC
services. Unless IHS administratively
expands the PRC service delivery,
however, Aquinnah cannot cover
hundreds of its tribal members under
PRC. IHS has therefore revisited
Aquinnah’s request and believes that
unique circumstances are present that
warrant expanding the Aquinnah PRC
service delivery area beyond the general
geographic area identified by Congress
in Public Law 100–95 as ‘‘on or near’’.
These unique circumstances include the
factors identified by the BIA in
recognizing the Aquinnah prior to the
enactment of Public Law 100–95, BIA’s
understanding of the settlement
language, and Dukes County’s status as
an island and the significant number of
Aquinnah’s members who reside
permanently off of the island and
continue to maintain close economic
and social ties with the Aquinnah.
The BIA recognized the Aquinnah
Tribe as an Indian Tribe eligible for
Federal benefits on February 10, 1987,
pursuant to a notice published in the
Federal Register. See 52 FR 4193. As
part of its findings, BIA concluded ‘‘that
the [Aquinnah] have an extensive and
interrelated communication network
connecting those Wampanoag members
in Gay Head and elsewhere on Martha’s
Vineyard with each other and with
those members living off-island.’’ The
BIA further concluded that the Tribal
government ‘‘maintained political
influence and/or authority over both its
resident and non-resident members.’’
Aquinnah has a significant number of
members who are not residents of Dukes
County. According to Aquinnah’s
estimates, 268 enrolled Aquinnah
members are non-residents who remain
actively involved with the Tribe, reside
in Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk,
Plymouth and Suffolk Counties and are
not currently eligible for PRC care.
Aquinnah provides limited direct
services to its Tribal members by
operating a small clinic in Dukes
County that is open once or twice a
month. To access direct care services,
non-residents must travel over one and
a half hours via ferry and car to receive
the health care offered at the clinic. As
a consequence, most non-residents do
not seek care on the island.
Comment: The Mashpee tribe
commented that the publication of the
notice is arbitrary, capricious, and
contrary to law.
Response: IHS disagrees. IHS’s
decision to publish a notice of the
intention to expand the Aquinnah PRC
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
20390
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
service delivery area was not arbitrary,
capricious, or contrary to law. IHS rules
expressly authorize IHS to expand a
PRC service delivery area through a
notice issued pursuant to the
Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C.
553) and that process has been followed
here. IHS is implementing a change in
the way it reviews PRC delivery
expansion requests, but that change is
fully consistent with the existing
language in the rules.
Comment: 42 CFR 136.22(a)(6)
provides that ‘‘the [CHSDA] shall
consist of a county which includes all
or part of a reservation, and any county
or counties which have a common
boundary with the reservation.’’ As
explained in the 2011 Declination
Letter, ‘‘since the county is coextensive
with the Atlantic Ocean island of
Martha’s Vineyard, there is no adjacent
county to consider for inclusion in the
CHSDA.’’
Response: The comment references
the starting point for establishing a PRC
service delivery area. As noted above,
IHS retains the administrative discretion
to redesignate PRC service delivery
areas after they are initially designated.
The criteria for expansion requires IHS
to consider geographic proximity, but it
does not require IHS to limit expansion
to adjacent counties.
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS AND SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS
Tribe/Reservation
County/State
Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas ........................................................
Alaska .......................................................................................................
Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming ......................
Aroostook Band of Micmacs ....................................................................
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation,
Montana.
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the
Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin.
Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan ....................................................
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana ............
Brigham City Intermountain School Health Center, Utah ........................
Burns Paiute Tribe ....................................................................................
California ...................................................................................................
Catawba Indian Nation .............................................................................
Cayuga Nation ..........................................................................................
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South
Dakota.
Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation, Montana ........
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana ..................................................................
Cocopah Tribe of Arizona ........................................................................
Coeur D’Alene Tribe .................................................................................
Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation,
Arizona and California.
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation ..........................
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon ....................................
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation ...................................
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington ................
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians
Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Nevada and Utah .....
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon ...........
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation .........................
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon ........
Coquille Indian Tribe ................................................................................
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana ...................................................................
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians .........................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cowlitz Indian Tribe ..................................................................................
Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota
Crow Tribe of Montana .............................................................................
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians ..........................................................
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota ......................................
Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin .................................
Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of
Montana.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Pinal, AZ.
Polk, TX.1
Entire State.2
Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY, Sublette, WY.
Aroostook, ME.3
Daniels, MT, McCone, MT, Richland, MT, Roosevelt, MT, Sheridan,
MT, Valley, MT.
Ashland, WI, Iron, WI.
Chippewa, MI.
Glacier, MT, Pondera, MT.
(4)
Harney, OR.
Entire State, except for the counties listed in the footnote.5
All Counties in SC 6, Cabarrus, NC, Cleveland, NC, Gaston, NC, Mecklenburg, NC, Rutherford, NC, Union, NC.
Allegany, NY 7, Cattaraugus, NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY, Warren,
PA.
Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Haakon, SD, Meade, SD, Perkins, SD, Potter, SD, Stanley, SD, Sully, SD, Walworth, SD, Ziebach, SD.
Chouteau, MT, Hill, MT, Liberty, MT.
St. Mary Parish, LA.
Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Benewah, ID, Kootenai, ID, Latah, ID, Spokane, WA, Whitman, WA.
La Paz, AZ, Riverside, CA, San Bernardino, CA, Yuma, AZ.
Flathead, MT, Lake, MT, Missoula, MT, Sanders, MT.
Klickitat, WA, Lewis, WA, Skamania, WA 8, Yakima, WA.
Benton, OR 9, Clackamas, OR, Lane, OR,
Lincoln, OR, Linn, OR, Marion, OR, Multnomah, OR, Polk, OR,
Tillamook, OR, Washington, OR, Yam Hill, OR.
Grays Harbor, WA, Lewis, WA, Thurston, WA.
Chelan, WA 10, Douglas, WA, Ferry, WA, Grant, WA, Lincoln, WA,
Okanogan, WA, Stevens, WA.
Coos, OR 11, Curry, OR, Douglas, OR, Lane, OR, Lincoln, OR.
Nevada, Juab, UT, Toole, UT.
Polk, OR 12, Washington, OR, Marion, OR,
Yamhill, OR, Tillamook, OR, Multnomah, OR.
Umatilla, OR, Union, OR.
Clackamas, OR, Jefferson, OR, Linn, OR,
Marion, OR, Wasco, OR.
Coos, OR, Curry, OR, Douglas, OR, Jackson, OR, Lane, OR.
Allen Parish, LA, Elton, LA.13
Coos, OR 14, Deshutes, OR, Douglas, OR,
Jackson, OR, Josephine, OR, Klamath, OR, Lane, OR.
Clark, WA, Cowlitz, WA, King, WA, Lewis, WA, Pierce, WA, Skamania,
WA, Thurston, WA, Columbia, OR 15, Kittitas, WA, Wahkiakum, WA.
Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hand, SD, Hughes, SD, Hyde, SD, Lyman, SD,
Stanley, SD.
Big Horn, MT, Carbon, MT, Treasure, MT 16, Yellowstone, MT, Big
Horn, WY, Sheridan, WY.
Cherokee, NC, Graham, NC, Haywood, NC, Jackson, NC, Swain, NC.
Moody, SD.
Forest, WI, Marinette, WI, Oconto, WI.
Blaine, MT, Phillips, MT.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
20391
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS AND SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/Reservation
County/State
Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation, Nevada and Oregon.
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Arizona ..................................................
Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, California and Nevada ..................
Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Michigan ........
Hannahville Indian Community, Michigan ................................................
Haskell Indian Health Center ...................................................................
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation, Arizona ........................
Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin ................................................................
Hoh Indian Tribe .......................................................................................
Hopi Tribe of Arizona ...............................................................................
Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians ............................................................
Hualapai Indian Tribe of the Hualapai Indian Reservation, Arizona ........
Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska ........................................................
Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe ......................................................................
Jena Band of Choctaw Indians ................................................................
Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico .......................................................
Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of the Kaibab Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Kalispel Indian Community of the Kalispel Reservation ..........................
Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico ......................................................................
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan ..........................................
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas ........................................................
Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas .........
Klamath Tribes .........................................................................................
Koi Nation of Northern California (formerly known as Lower Lake
Rancheria, California).
Kootenai Tribe of Idaho ............................................................................
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the Lac
du Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin..
Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Michigan .........................................
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Michigan ..........................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule Reservation, South Dakota
Lower Elwha Tribal Community ...............................................................
Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota ......................
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation ...................................................
Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation .............................
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe .....................................................................
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe ....................................................................
Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan ....
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin .....................................................
Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico ....
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians ....................................................................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake) .....
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Fond du Lac Band .....................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Grand Portage Band .................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Leech Lake Band ......................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Mille Lacs Band .........................
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota White Earth Band ......................
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians .......................................................
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut ................................................
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe .........................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Nevada, Malheur, OR.
Maricopa, AZ.
Nevada, Mohave, AZ, San Bernardino, CA.
Maricopa, AZ, Pinal, AZ.
Antrim, MI 17, Benzie, MI, Charlevoix, MI,
Grand Traverse, MI, Leelanau, MI, Manistee, MI.
Delta, MI, Menominee, MI.
Douglas, KS.18
Coconino, AZ.
Adams, WI 19, Clark, WI, Columbia, WI, Crawford, WI, Dane, WI, Eau
Claire, WI, Houston, MN, Jackson, WI, Juneau, WI, La Crosse, WI,
Marathon, WI, Monroe, WI, Sauk, WI, Shawano, WI, Vernon, WI,
Wood, WI.
Jefferson, WA.
Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Navajo, AZ.
Aroostook, ME.20
Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Yavapai, AZ.
Brown, KS, Doniphan, KS, Richardson, NE.
Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Grand Parish, LA 21, LaSalle Parish, LA, Rapides Parish, LA.
Archuleta, CO, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM.
Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Kane, UT.
Pend Oreille, WA, Spokane, WA.
Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Baraga, MI, Houghton, MI, Ontonagon, MI.
Maverick, TX.22
Brown, KS, Jackson, KS.
Klamath, OR.23
Lake, CA, Sonoma, CA.24
Boundary, ID.
Sawyer, WI.
Iron, WI, Oneida, WI, Vilas, WI.
Gogebic, MI.
Kent, MI 25, Muskegon, MI, Newaygo, MI,
Oceana, MI, Ottawa, MI, Manistee, MI, Mason, MI, Wexford, MI, Lake,
MI.
Alcona, MI 25, Alger, MI, Alpena, MI, Antrim, MI, Benzie, MI,
Charlevoix, MI, Cheboygan, MI, Chippewa, MI, Crawford, MI, Delta,
MI, Emmet, MI, Grand Traverse, MI, Iosco, MI, Kalkaska, MI,
Leelanau, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac, MI, Manistee, MI, Missaukee, MI,
Montmorency, MI, Ogemaw, MI, Oscoda, MI, Otsego, MI, Presque
Isle, MI, Schoolcraft, MI, Roscommon, MI, Wexford, MI.
Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hughes, SD, Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD.
Clallam, WA.
Redwood, MN, Renville, MN.
Whatcom, WA.
Clallam, WA.
New London, CT.26
Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA, Suffolk,
MA.27
Allegan, MI 28, Barry, MI, Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI, Ottawa, MI.
Langlade, WI, Menominee, WI, Oconto, WI, Shawano, WI.
Chaves, NM, Lincoln, NM, Otero, NM.
Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-Dade, FL, Hendry, FL.
Itasca, MN, Koochiching, MN, St. Louis, MN.
Carlton, MN, St. Louis, MN.
Cook, MN.
Beltrami, MN, Cass, MN, Hubbard, MN, Itasca, MN.
Aitkin, MN, Kanebec, MN, Mille Lacs, MN, Pine, MN.
Becker, MN, Clearwater, MN, Mahnomen, MN, Norman, MN, Polk, MN.
Attala, MS, Jasper, MS 29, Jones, MS, Kemper, MS, Leake, MS,
Neshoba, MS, Newton, MS, Noxubee, MS 29, Scott, MS 30, Winston,
MS.
Fairfield, CT, Hartford, CT, Litchfield, CT, Middlesex, CT, New Haven,
CT, New London, CT, Tolland, CT, Windham, CT.
King, WA, Pierce, WA.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
20392
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS AND SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/Reservation
County/State
Narragansett Indian Tribe .........................................................................
Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah ..........................................
Washington, RI.31
Apache, AZ, Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM,
Coconino, AZ, Kane, UT, McKinley, NM, Montezuma, CO, Navajo, AZ,
Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM, San Juan, NM, San Juan, UT,
Socorro, NM, Valencia, NM.
Entire State.32
Clearwater, ID, Idaho, ID, Latah, ID, Lewis, ID, Nez Perce, ID.
Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA.
Whatcom, WA.
Big Horn, MT, Carter, MT 33, Rosebud, MT.
Nevada .....................................................................................................
Nez Perce Tribe .......................................................................................
Nisqually Indian Tribe ...............................................................................
Nooksack Indian Tribe ..............................................................................
Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana.
Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation ...................................................
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan ........................
Oglala Sioux Tribe ....................................................................................
Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico ..................................................................
Oklahoma .................................................................................................
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska ........................................................................
Oneida Nation of New York .....................................................................
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin ......................................................
Onondaga Nation .....................................................................................
Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah ......................................................................
Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona ................................................................
Passamaquoddy Tribe ..............................................................................
Penobscot Nation .....................................................................................
Poarch Band of Creeks ............................................................................
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana ................
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska .........................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe ....................................................................
Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation ..........................................................
Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota ....................
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Cochiti, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico ...................................................................
Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico .................................................................
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico ...............................................................
Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico ............................................................
Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico ..........................................................
Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico .....................................................
Pueblo of Sandia, New Mexico ................................................................
Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico ..........................................................
Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico ........................................................
Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico ...................................................................
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico .............................................................
Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico ......................................................................
Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation .............................................
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, California and Arizona.
Quileute Tribe of the Quileute Reservation ..............................................
Quinault Indian Nation ..............................................................................
Rapid City, South Dakota .........................................................................
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin ..........
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Minnesota ....................................
Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska .........................
Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa ..............................................
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan ...........................................
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe .......................................................................
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Box Elder, UT.34
Allegan, MI 35, Barry, MI, Branch, MI, Calhoun, MI, Kalamazoo, MI,
Kent, MI, Ottawa, MI.
Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE, Custer, SD, Dawes, NE, Fall River, SD,
Jackson, SD 36, Mellete, SD, Pennington, SD, Shannon, SD, Sheridan, NE, Todd, SD.
Rio Arriba, NM.
Entire State.37
Burt, NE, Cuming, NE, Monona, IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE.
Chenango, NY, Cortland, NY, Herkimer, NY, Madison, NY, Oneida,
NY, Onondaga, NY.
Brown, WI, Outagamie, WI.
Onondaga, NY.
Iron, UT 38 Millard, UT, Sevier, UT, Washington, UT.
Pima, AZ.39
Aroostook, ME 40 41, Washington, ME.
Aroostook, ME 40, Penobscot, ME.
Baldwin, AL 42, Elmore, AL, Escambia, AL, Mobile, AL, Monroe, AL,
Escambia, FL.
Allegan, MI 43, Berrien, MI, Cass, MI, Elkhart, IN, Kosciusko, IN, La
Porte, IN, Marshall, IN, St. Joseph, IN, Starke, IN, Van Buren, MI.
Boyd, NE 44, Burt, NE, Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, NE, Hall, NE, Holt,
NE, Knox, NE, Lancaster, NE, Madison, NE, Platte, NE,
Pottawattomie, IA, Sarpy, NE, Stanton, NE, Wayne, NE, Woodbury,
IA.
Kitsap, WA.
Jackson, KS.
Goodhue, MN.
Cibola, NM.
Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Bernalillo, NM, Torrance, NM, Valencia, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM, Sandoval, NM, Valencia, NM.
Santa Fe, NM.
Taos, NM.
Rio Arriba, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
Los Alamos, NM, Rio Arriba, NM, Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Bernalillo, NM, Sandoval, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
Los Alamos, NM, Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Colfax, NM, Taos, NM.
Santa Fe, NM.
Sandoval, NM.
King, WA, Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA.
Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Grays Harbor, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Pennington, SD.45
Bayfield, WI.
Beltrami, MN, Clearwater, MN, Koochiching, MN, Lake of the Woods,
MN, Marshall, MN, Pennington, MN, Polk, MN, Roseau, MN.
Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE, Gregory, SD, Lyman, SD, Mellette, SD,
Todd, SD, Tripp, SD.
Brown, KS, Richardson, NE.
Tama, IA.
Arenac, MI 46, Clare, MI, Isabella, MI, Midland, MI, Missaukee, MI.
Franklin, NY, St. Lawrence, NY.
Maricopa, AZ.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
20393
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS AND SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/Reservation
County/State
Samish Indian Nation ...............................................................................
Clallam, WA 47, Island, WA, Jefferson, WA, King, WA, Kitsap, WA,
Pierce, WA, San Juan, WA, Skagit, WA, Snohomish, WA, Whatcom,
WA.
Apache, AZ, Cochise, AZ, Gila, AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ, Pinal,
AZ.
Coconino, AZ, San Juan, UT.
Bon Homme, SD, Knox, NE.
Snohomish, WA, Skagit, WA.
Alger, MI 48, Chippewa, MI, Delta, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac, MI, Marquette, MI, Schoolcraft, MI.
Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-Dade, FL, Glades, FL, Hendry, FL.
Allegany, NY, Cattaraugus, NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY, Warren,
PA.
Scott, MN.
Nassau, NY 49, Suffolk, NY.
Pacific, WA.
Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY, Sublette, WY.
Bannock, ID, Bingham, ID, Caribou, ID, Lemhi, ID 50, Power, ID.
Nevada, Owyhee, ID.
Codington, SD, Day, SD, Grant, SD, Marshall, SD, Richland, ND, Roberts, SD, Sargent, ND, Traverse, MN.
Mason, WA.
Tooele, UT.
King, WA 51, Snohomish, WA, Pierce, WA, Island, WA, Mason, WA.
Forest, WI.
Archuleta, CO, La Plata, CO, Montezuma, CO, Rio Arriba, NM, San
Juan, NM.
Benson, ND, Eddy, ND, Nelson, ND, Ramsey, ND.
Ferry, WA, Lincoln, WA, Stevens, WA.
Mason, WA.
Barron, WI, Burnett, WI, Pine, MN, Polk, WI, Washburn, WI.
Adams, ND, Campbell, SD, Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Emmons, ND,
Grant, ND, Morton, ND, Perkins, SD, Sioux, ND, Walworth, SD,
Ziebach, SD.
Snohomish, WA.
Menominee, WI, Shawano, WI.
Kitsap, WA.
Skagit, WA.
Kern, CA.52
Dunn, ND, Mercer, ND, McKenzie, ND, McLean, ND, Mountrail, ND,
Ward, ND.
Maricopa, AZ, Pima, AZ, Pinal, AZ.
Genesee, NY, Erie, NY, Niagara, NY.
Gila, AZ.
Divide, ND 53, McKenzie, ND, Williams, ND, Richland, MT, Roosevelt,
MT, Sheridan, MT.
Snohomish, WA.
Avoyelles, LA, Rapides, LA.54
Rolette, ND.
Niagara, NY.
Chippewa, MN, Yellow Medicine, MN.
Skagit, WA.
Carbon, UT, Daggett, UT, Duchesne, UT, Emery, UT, Grand, UT, Rio
Blanco, CO, Summit, UT, Uintah, UT, Utah, UT, Wasatch, UT.
Apache, AZ, La Plata, CO, Montezuma, CO, San Juan, NM, San Juan,
UT.
Dukes, MA 55, Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA,
Suffolk, MA.56
Nevada, California except for the counties listed in footnote.
Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Gila, AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ, Navajo, AZ.
Sacramento, CA.57
Dakota, NE, Dixon, NE, Monona, IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE,
Woodbury, IA.
Bon Homme, SD, Boyd, NE, Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, SD, Gregory,
SD, Hutchinson, SD, Knox, NE.
Yavapai, AZ.
San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Carlos Reservation, Arizona .........
San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona ............................................
Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska ...............................................................
Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe ........................................................................
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan ............................
Seminole Tribe of Florida .........................................................................
Seneca Nation of Indians .........................................................................
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Minnesota ......................
Shinnecock Indian Nation .........................................................................
Shoalwater Bay Tribe of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Reservation ...........
Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming .....................
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation .........................
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, Nevada .........
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South
Dakota.
Skokomish Indian Tribe ............................................................................
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah .........................................
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe ..........................................................................
Sokaogon Chippewa Community, Wisconsin ..........................................
Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado ..
Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota ................................................................
Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation ............................................
Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin Island Reservation .........................
St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin ................................................
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota ..............................
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Washington ..........................................
Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin ...........................................
Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Reservation ......................
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community ........................................................
Tejon Indian Tribe ....................................................................................
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota ..
Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona .........................................................
Tonawanda Band of Seneca ....................................................................
Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona ................................................................
Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana ...................................
Tulalip Tribes of Washington ....................................................................
Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe .........................................................................
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota ..................
Tuscarora Nation ......................................................................................
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota ........................................................
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe ........................................................................
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation, Utah .....................
Ute Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation, Colorado, New
Mexico & Utah.
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) ...........................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California .....................................................
White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona
Wilton Rancheria, California .....................................................................
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska .................................................................
Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota ......................................................
Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe ..................................................................
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo of Texas ...............................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Yavapai, AZ.
El Paso, TX.1
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
20394
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
PURCHASED/REFERRED CARE SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS AND SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS—Continued
Tribe/Reservation
County/State
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico ....................................
Apache, AZ, Cibola, NM, McKinley, NM, Valencia, NM.
1 Public Law 100–89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ‘‘members
of the Tribe’’ by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively.
2 Entire State of Alaska is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(1)).
3 Aroostook Band of Micmacs was recognized by Congress on November 26, 1991, through the Aroostook Band of Micmac Settlement Act.
Aroostook County, ME, was defined as the SDA.
4 Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is
based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services
have been provided at Brigham City Intermountain School Health Center, Utah (Pub. L. 88–358).
5 Entire State of California, excluding the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco, San
Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura, is
designated a CHSDA (25 U.S.C. 1680).
6 The counties were recognized after the January 1984 CHSDA FRN was published, in accordance with Pub. L. 103–116, Catawba Indian
Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993, dated October 27, 1993.
7 There is no reservation for the Cayuga Nation; the service delivery area consists of those counties identified by the Cayuga Nation.
8 Skamania County, WA, has historically been a part of the Yakama Service Unit population since 1979.
9 In order to carry out the Congressional intent of the Siletz Restoration Act, Pub. L. 95–195, as expressed in H. Report No. 95–623, at page 4,
members of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon residing in these counties are eligible for contract health services.
10 Chelan County, WA, has historically been a part of the Colville Service Unit population since 1970.
11 Pursuant to Pub. L. 98–481 (H. Rept. No. 98–904), Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Restoration Act, members of the Tribe residing in
these counties were specified as eligible for Federal services and benefits without regard to the existence of a Federal Indian reservation.
12 The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon were recognized by Pub. L. 98–165 which was signed into law on November 22, 1983, and provides for eligibility in these six counties without regard to the existence of a reservation.
13 The CHSDA for the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana was expanded administratively by the Director, IHS, through regulation (42 CFR 136.22(6))
to include city limits of Elton, LA.
14 Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians recognized by Pub. L. 97–391, signed into law on December 29, 1983. House Rept. No. 97–
862 designates Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Counties as a service area without regard to the existence of a reservation. The IHS later administratively expanded the CHSDA to include the counties of Coos, OR, Deshutes, OR, Klamath, OR, and Lane, OR.
15 The Cowlitz Indian Tribe was recognized in July 2002 as documented at 67 FR 46329, July 12, 2002. The counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
The CHSDA was administratively expanded to included Columbia County, OR, Kittitas, WA, and Wahkiakum County, WA, as published at 67884
FR December 21, 2009.
16 Treasure County, MT, has historically been a part of the Crow Service Unit population.
17 The counties listed have historically been a part of the Grand Traverse Service Unit population since 1980.
18 Haskell Indian Health Center has historically been a part of Kansas Service Unit since 1979. Special programs have been established by
Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation
of funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at Haskell Indian Health Center
(H. Rept. No. 95–392).
19 CHSDA counties for the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(5)). Dane County, WI, was added
to the reservation by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1986.
20 Public Law 97–428 provides that any member of the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians in or around the Town of Houlton shall be eligible
without regard to existence of a reservation.
21 The Jena Band of Choctaw Indian was Federally acknowledged as documented at 60 FR 28480, May 31, 1995. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L.
93–638.
22 Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas, formerly known as the Texas Band of Kickapoo, was recognized by Pub. L. 97–429, signed into law on
January 8, 1983. The Act provides for eligibility for Kickapoo Tribal members residing in Maverick County without regard to the existence of a
reservation.
23 The Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act (Pub. L. 99–398, Sec. 2(2)) states that for the purpose of Federal services and benefits ‘‘members
of the tribe residing in Klamath County shall be deemed to be residing in or near a reservation’’.
24 The Koi Nation of Northern California, formerly known as the Lower Lake Rancheria, was reaffirmed by the Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs on December 29, 2000. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
25 The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa
Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant to Pub. L. 103–324, Sec.4(b) the counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
26 Mashantucket Pequot Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 98–134, signed into law on October 18, 1983, provides a reservation for the
Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe in New London County, CT.
27 The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe was recognized in February 2007, as documented at 72 FR 8007, February 22, 2007. The counties listed
were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA,
Pub. L. 93–638.
28 The Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan was recognized in October 1998, as documented at 63 FR 56936,
October 23, 1998. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a
CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
29 Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health services;
these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR 136.22.
30 Scott County, MS, has historically been a part of the Choctaw Service Unit population since 1970.
31 The Narragansett Indian Tribe was recognized by Pub. L. 95–395, signed into law September 30, 1978. Lands in Washington County, RI,
are now Federally restricted and the Bureau of Indian Affairs considers them as the Narragansett Indian Reservation.
32 Entire State of Nevada is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(2)).
33 Carter County, MT, has historically been a part of the Northern Cheyenne Service Unit population since 1979.
34 Land of Box Elder County, Utah, was taken into trust for the Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation in 1986.
35 The Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan, formerly known as the Huron Band of Potawatomi, Inc., was recognized in December 1995, as documented at 60 FR 66315, December 21, 1995. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function
as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
36 Washabaugh County, SD, merged and became part of Jackson County, SD, in 1983; both were/are CHSDA counties for the Oglala Sioux
Tribe.
37 Entire State of Oklahoma is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(3)).
38 Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act, Pub. L. 96–227, provides for the extension of services for the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah to
these four counties without regard to the existence of a reservation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2016 / Notices
20395
39 Legislative history (H.R. Report No. 95–1021) to Pub. L.95–375, Extension of Federal Benefits to Pascua Yaqui Indians, Arizona, expresses
congressional intent that lands conveyed to the Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona pursuant to Act of October 8, 1964. (Pub. L. 88–350) shall be
deemed a Federal Indian Reservation.
40 The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–420; H. Rept. 96–1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide
contract health services to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot Nation.
41 The Passamaquoddy Tribe has two reservations. The PRC SDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe of Indian Township, ME, is Aroostook County, ME, and Washington County, ME. The PRC SDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe of Pleasant Point, ME, is Aroostook County ME, and Washington County, ME, south of State Route 9.
42 Counties in the Service Unit designated by Congress for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (see H. Rept. 98–886, June 29, 1984; Cong.
Record, October 10, 1984, Pg. H11929).
43 Pub. L. 103–323 restored Federal recognition to the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana, in 1994 and identified
counties to serve as the SDA.
44 The Ponca Restoration Act, Pub. L. 101–484, recognized members of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska in Boyd, Douglas, Knox, Madison or
Lancaster counties of Nebraska or Charles Mix county of South Dakota as residing on or near a reservation. Pub. L. 104–109 made technical
corrections to laws relating to Native Americans and added Burt, Hall, Holt, Platte, Sarpy, Stanton, and Wayne counties of Nebraska and
Pottawatomie and Woodbury counties of Iowa to the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska SDA.
45 Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these facilities is
based on the legislative history of the appropriation of funds for the particular facility, rather than the eligibility regulations. Historically services
have been provided at Rapid City (S. Rept. No. 1154, FY 1967 Interior Approp. 89th Cong. 2d Sess.).
46 Historically part of Isabella Reservation Area for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and the Eastern Michigan Service Unit population since 1979.
47 The Samish Indian Tribe Nation was Federally acknowledged in April 1996 as documented at 61 FR 15825, April 9, 1996. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
48 CHSDA counties for the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan, were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(4)).
49 The Shinnecock Indian Nation was Federally acknowledged in June 2010 as documented at 75 FR 34760, June 18, 2010. The counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
50 Lemhi County, ID, has historically been a part of the Fort Hall Service Unit population since 1979.
51 The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe was Federally acknowledged in August 1997 as documented at 62 FR 45864, August 29, 1997. The counties
listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
52 On December 30, 2011 the Office of Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs reaffirmed the Federal recognition of the Tejon Indian Tribe. The
county listed was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
53 The Secretary acting through the Service is directed to provide contract health services to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians that
reside in Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana, in Divide, Mackenzie, and Williams counties in the state of North Dakota and the adjoining counties of Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan in the state of Montana (Sec. 815, Pub. L. 94–437).
54 Rapides County, LA, has historically been a part of the Tunica Biloxi Service Unit population since 1982.
55 According to Pub. L. 100–95, Sec. 12, members of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) residing on Martha’s Vineyard are
deemed to be living on or near an Indian reservation for the purposes of eligibility for Federal services.
56 The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93–638.
57 The Wilton Rancheria, California had Federal recognition restored in July 2009 as documented at 74 FR 33468, July 13, 2009. Sacramento
County, CA, was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA. Sacramento County was not covered when Congress originally established the State of California as a CHSDA excluding certain counties including Sacramento County (25 U.S.C. 1680).
Dated: March 31, 2016.
Elizabeth A. Fowler,
Deputy Director for Management Operations,
Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–07951 Filed 4–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Notification of a Public Teleconference
on American Indian/Alaska Native
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender
and Two-Spirit Health Issues
Indian Health Service.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
In 2015, the Indian Health
Service (IHS) sought public input in
writing and in person through a Notice
of Request for Information (80 FR
32167) and two meetings in the
Washington, DC area to gather feedback
on best practices to advance and
promote the health needs of the
American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Apr 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and
Two-Spirit (LGBT2S) community (80 FR
43447 and 80 FR 51824). IHS is
continuing to seek feedback from the
LGBT2S community by holding a series
of public teleconferences. In these
teleconferences, participants will be
asked to comment on several key
dimensions of the health needs of the
AI/AN LGBT2S community, including
but not limited to the following
questions:
a. Are there effective models and best
practices surrounding the health care of
the LGBT2S community that should be
considered for replication?
b. What are the specific measures that
could be used to track progress in
improving the health of LGBT2S
persons?
c. How can IHS better engage with
stakeholders around the implementation
of improvements?
d. Are there gaps or disparities in
existing IHS services offered to LGBT2S
persons?
e. What additional information
should the agency consider while
developing plans to improve health care
for the LGBT2S community?
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The first public teleconference
will be held on May 5, 2016 from 3:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard
Time).
ADDRESSES: The teleconference will be
conducted by telephone only. Please see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for the callin information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Members of the public who wish to
obtain further information regarding this
public teleconference may contact Lisa
Neel, MPH, Program Coordinator, Office
of Clinical and Preventive Services,
Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Mailstop 08N34A, Rockville, MD
20857, Telephone 301–443–4305. (This
is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting is open to the public. The
virtual meeting is available via
teleconference line and will
accommodate 200 people. Join the
meeting by calling the toll free phone
number at 800–857–9744 and providing
the public participant passcode number:
3618057. Participants should call and
connect 15 minutes prior to the meeting
in order for logistics to be set up. Call
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20388-20395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07951]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Notice of the Redesignation of the Service Delivery Area for the
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)
AGENCY: Indian Health Service.
ACTION: Final notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final notice advises the public that the Indian Health
Service (IHS) has decided to expand the geographic boundaries of the
Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) service delivery area for the Wampanoag
Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) of Massachusetts pursuant to 42 CFR
136.22. The Aquinnah service delivery area previously covered Martha's
Vineyard, Dukes County in the State of Massachusetts. The expanded
service delivery area includes counties of Barnstable, Bristol,
Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, and Dukes Counties in the State of
Massachusetts. The sole purpose of this expansion is to authorize
Aquinnah to cover additional tribal members and beneficiaries under
Aquinnah's PRC program using the existing Federal allocation for PRC
funds.
DATES: The effective date of expansion will be 60 days from the date of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, Office
of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 5600
Fishers Lane, Mailstop 10E85C, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone
(301) 443-2694 (This is not a toll free number).
Background: The Indian Health Service (IHS) currently provides
services under regulations codified at 42 CFR part 136, subparts A
through C. Subpart C defines a Contract Health Service Delivery Area
(CHSDA), now referred to as a Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) service
delivery area, as the geographic area within which PRC will be made
available by the IHS to members of an identified Indian community who
reside in the area. Residence in a PRC service delivery area by a
person who is within the scope of the Indian health program, as set
forth in 42 CFR 136.12, creates no legal entitlement to PRC but only
potential eligibility for services. Services needed but not available
at an IHS/Tribal facility are provided under the PRC program depending
on the availability of funds, the person's relative medical priority,
and the actual availability and accessibility of alternate resources in
accordance with the regulations.
As applicable to the Tribes, these regulations provide that, unless
otherwise designated, a PRC service delivery area shall consist of a
county which includes all or part of a reservation and any county or
counties which have a common boundary with the reservation. 42 CFR
136.22(a)(6). The regulations also provide that after consultation with
the Tribal governing body or bodies on those reservations included
within the PRC service delivery area, the Secretary may from time to
time, redesignate areas within the United States for inclusion in or
exclusion from a PRC service delivery area. The regulations require
that certain criteria must be considered before any redesignation is
made. The criteria are as follows:
(1) The number of Indians residing in the area proposed to be so
included or excluded;
(2) Whether the Tribal governing body has determined that Indians
residing in the area near the reservation are socially and economically
affiliated with the tribe;
(3) The geographic proximity to the reservation of the area whose
inclusion or exclusion is being considered; and
(4) The level of funding which would be available for the provision
of PRC.
Additionally, the regulations require that any redesignation of a
PRC service delivery area must be made in accordance with the
Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). In compliance with this
requirement, IHS published a proposed notice of redesignation and
requested public comments on August 24, 2015 (80 FR 51281). Aquinnah
requested that IHS expand the Aquinnah service delivery area to include
Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk Counties in the
State of Massachusetts.
In support of this expansion, IHS adopts the following findings of
the Aquinnah Tribe:
(1) By expanding, the Tribe's estimated current eligible population
will be increased by 268.
(2) The Tribe has determined these 268 individuals are socially and
economically affiliated with the Tribe.
(3) The expanded area including Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk,
Plymouth, and Suffolk Counties in the State of Massachusetts are across
the Bay from Martha's Vineyard, Dukes County, Massachusetts.
(4) The Tribal members located in these counties currently do not
use the Indian health system for their health care needs.
Aquinnah will use its existing Federal allocation for PRC funds to
provide services to the expanded population. No additional financial
resources will be allocated by IHS to Aquinnah to provide services to
its members residing in these counties nor should this expansion be
construed to have any present or future effect on the allocation of
resources between the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and Aquinnah.
Public Comments: The Agency only received comments from the Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe (Mashpee). Mashpee incorporated several letters into
its submission. Through these comments
[[Page 20389]]
and letters, Mashpee indicated that it does not support the proposed
redesignation and articulated several objections to the expansion,
which IHS addresses below:
Comment: IHS has failed to meet its legal requirement to
meaningfully consult with the Mashpee Tribe as the only other Tribal
governing body within the proposed redesignated SDA in accordance with
42 CFR 136.22(b).
Response: IHS disagrees. IHS consulted with the Mashpee Tribe
regarding this proposed expansion. As Mashpee noted in its own
submission, IHS engaged in government-to-government discussions and
correspondence on this issue. IHS provided its answers to the Mashpee
Tribe's questions in a letter from Deputy Director McSwain to Mashpee
Chairman Cromwell, dated October 5, 2015. While Mashpee questions the
adequacy of IHS's answers, they nonetheless demonstrate that IHS has
engaged in meaningful consultation with Mashpee with respect to this
expansion. Additionally, the opportunity to submit comments on a
proposed notice is a form of consultation. IHS recognizes that Mashpee
has concerns with the expansion and does not support the IHS decisions
in this regard. IHS is not required, after consultation with a Tribe,
to adopt the specific position of the Mashpee Tribe.
Comment: IHS has no legal authority to contravene the clear legal
mandate of the Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay Head, Inc., Indian
Claims Settlement Act of 1987.
Response: IHS agrees with the Mashpee Tribe that the Agency cannot
contravene the Settlement Act, but the Agency does not believe the
expansion is prohibited by the Settlement Act. It is HHS's
understanding that the Settlement Act is not implemented by Department
of the Interior (DOI) as a limitation for DOI programs and services.
Accordingly, after conferring with DOI regarding its position, IHS has
decided to revisit the expansion issue. The establishment of PRC
service delivery areas is an administrative function of IHS, governed
by the regulations at 42 CFR 136.22. Historically, IHS has established
service delivery areas in accordance with our understanding of
Congressional intent, for example as evidenced by geographically
designated areas identified in settlement acts, such as Public Law 100-
95. IHS does not intend to abandon that practice. Under PRC
regulations, however, IHS has preserved flexibility to redesignate
areas as appropriate for inclusion in or exclusion from PRC service
delivery. One of the criteria for such redesignations is the geographic
proximity of the expanded area to the existing reservation or service
delivery area. In the few circumstances where it has arisen, IHS has
aligned geographic proximity with Congressional findings of ``on or
near''.
Here, IHS proposed to expand a PRC delivery area beyond the
geographic description of ``on or near'' that Congress set forth in a
settlement or recognition act. IHS offered stakeholders the opportunity
to comment on the departure from historic practice by issuing a notice
of proposed expansion prior to issuing a final notice to ascertain
whether the departure is disruptive to tribes that have previously
relied on IHS's historic practice. IHS did not receive comments that
identify a detrimental reliance interest. Accordingly, when considering
the geographic proximity of the proposed expansion area under 42 CFR
136.22 to the existing reservation (or service delivery area), IHS will
no longer rigidly apply a Congressional finding of ``on or near'' as
prohibiting PRC delivery area expansion in considering expansion
requests. Although this is a change in the implementation of the
redesignation authority found at 42 CFR 136.22, no change is necessary
to the text of the regulation itself.
In making this change, however, IHS notes that Congress has, at
times, statutorily enacted PRC service delivery areas for some tribes
or for entire States. See, e.g. 25 U.S.C. 1678 (designating the entire
State of Arizona). Those enactments may limit changes in PRC delivery
area boundaries in some circumstances. Congress did not specifically
establish a PRC service delivery area for Aquinnah in the Settlement
Act; IHS administratively established this area through its
regulations. While IHS chose to establish and limit the Aquinnah PRC
service delivery area consistent with the language of the Act, in
keeping with our current understanding of DOI practices, the language
of the Act does not have to be read as preventing IHS from exercising
its administrative discretion to expand or reduce that initially
established area going forward. Indeed, IHS has already interpreted its
authority to permit the establishment of PRC service delivery areas
that go beyond what may otherwise be considered ``on or near'' a
reservation. For example, IHS has administratively designated entire
states as PRC service delivery areas, even though all parts of such
states were not necessarily ``on or near'' a reservation. Nor does
there appear to be any legislative history of the Act that would
suggest that Congress intended the language of Section 1771 to be a
limitation on IHS programs or administrative flexibility. There is also
no evidence to suggest that Congress intended to limit eligibility for
PRC services. Unless IHS administratively expands the PRC service
delivery, however, Aquinnah cannot cover hundreds of its tribal members
under PRC. IHS has therefore revisited Aquinnah's request and believes
that unique circumstances are present that warrant expanding the
Aquinnah PRC service delivery area beyond the general geographic area
identified by Congress in Public Law 100-95 as ``on or near''. These
unique circumstances include the factors identified by the BIA in
recognizing the Aquinnah prior to the enactment of Public Law 100-95,
BIA's understanding of the settlement language, and Dukes County's
status as an island and the significant number of Aquinnah's members
who reside permanently off of the island and continue to maintain close
economic and social ties with the Aquinnah.
The BIA recognized the Aquinnah Tribe as an Indian Tribe eligible
for Federal benefits on February 10, 1987, pursuant to a notice
published in the Federal Register. See 52 FR 4193. As part of its
findings, BIA concluded ``that the [Aquinnah] have an extensive and
interrelated communication network connecting those Wampanoag members
in Gay Head and elsewhere on Martha's Vineyard with each other and with
those members living off-island.'' The BIA further concluded that the
Tribal government ``maintained political influence and/or authority
over both its resident and non-resident members.'' Aquinnah has a
significant number of members who are not residents of Dukes County.
According to Aquinnah's estimates, 268 enrolled Aquinnah members are
non-residents who remain actively involved with the Tribe, reside in
Barnstable, Bristol, Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk Counties and are not
currently eligible for PRC care.
Aquinnah provides limited direct services to its Tribal members by
operating a small clinic in Dukes County that is open once or twice a
month. To access direct care services, non-residents must travel over
one and a half hours via ferry and car to receive the health care
offered at the clinic. As a consequence, most non-residents do not seek
care on the island.
Comment: The Mashpee tribe commented that the publication of the
notice is arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law.
Response: IHS disagrees. IHS's decision to publish a notice of the
intention to expand the Aquinnah PRC
[[Page 20390]]
service delivery area was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to
law. IHS rules expressly authorize IHS to expand a PRC service delivery
area through a notice issued pursuant to the Administrative Procedures
Act (5 U.S.C. 553) and that process has been followed here. IHS is
implementing a change in the way it reviews PRC delivery expansion
requests, but that change is fully consistent with the existing
language in the rules.
Comment: 42 CFR 136.22(a)(6) provides that ``the [CHSDA] shall
consist of a county which includes all or part of a reservation, and
any county or counties which have a common boundary with the
reservation.'' As explained in the 2011 Declination Letter, ``since the
county is coextensive with the Atlantic Ocean island of Martha's
Vineyard, there is no adjacent county to consider for inclusion in the
CHSDA.''
Response: The comment references the starting point for
establishing a PRC service delivery area. As noted above, IHS retains
the administrative discretion to redesignate PRC service delivery areas
after they are initially designated. The criteria for expansion
requires IHS to consider geographic proximity, but it does not require
IHS to limit expansion to adjacent counties.
Purchased/Referred Care Service Delivery Areas and Service Delivery
Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribe/Reservation County/State
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ak Chin Indian Community of the Pinal, AZ.
Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation,
Arizona.
Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas...... Polk, TX.\1\
Alaska................................. Entire State.\2\
Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY,
Reservation, Wyoming. Sublette, WY.
Aroostook Band of Micmacs.............. Aroostook, ME.\3\
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Daniels, MT, McCone, MT,
Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana. Richland, MT, Roosevelt, MT,
Sheridan, MT, Valley, MT.
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Ashland, WI, Iron, WI.
Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad
River Reservation, Wisconsin.
Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan... Chippewa, MI.
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Glacier, MT, Pondera, MT.
Reservation of Montana.
Brigham City Intermountain School (\4\)
Health Center, Utah.
Burns Paiute Tribe..................... Harney, OR.
California............................. Entire State, except for the
counties listed in the
footnote.\5\
Catawba Indian Nation.................. All Counties in SC \6\,
Cabarrus, NC, Cleveland, NC,
Gaston, NC, Mecklenburg, NC,
Rutherford, NC, Union, NC.
Cayuga Nation.......................... Allegany, NY \7\, Cattaraugus,
NY, Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY,
Warren, PA.
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Haakon,
Cheyenne River Reservation, South SD, Meade, SD, Perkins, SD,
Dakota. Potter, SD, Stanley, SD,
Sully, SD, Walworth, SD,
Ziebach, SD.
Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Chouteau, MT, Hill, MT,
Boy's Reservation, Montana. Liberty, MT.
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana.......... St. Mary Parish, LA.
Cocopah Tribe of Arizona............... Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Coeur D'Alene Tribe.................... Benewah, ID, Kootenai, ID,
Latah, ID, Spokane, WA,
Whitman, WA.
Colorado River Indian Tribes of the La Paz, AZ, Riverside, CA, San
Colorado River Indian Reservation, Bernardino, CA, Yuma, AZ.
Arizona and California.
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Flathead, MT, Lake, MT,
of the Flathead Reservation. Missoula, MT, Sanders, MT.
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Klickitat, WA, Lewis, WA,
Yakama Nation. Skamania, WA \8\, Yakima, WA.
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Benton, OR \9\, Clackamas, OR,
of Oregon. Lane, OR,
Lincoln, OR, Linn, OR, Marion,
OR, Multnomah, OR, Polk, OR,
Tillamook, OR, Washington, OR,
Yam Hill, OR.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Grays Harbor, WA, Lewis, WA,
Reservation. Thurston, WA.
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Chelan, WA \10\, Douglas, WA,
Reservation, Washington. Ferry, WA, Grant, WA, Lincoln,
WA, Okanogan, WA, Stevens, WA.
Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Coos, OR \11\, Curry, OR,
Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians. Douglas, OR, Lane, OR,
Lincoln, OR.
Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Nevada, Juab, UT, Toole, UT.
Reservation, Nevada and Utah.
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Polk, OR \12\, Washington, OR,
Community of Oregon. Marion, OR,
Yamhill, OR, Tillamook, OR,
Multnomah, OR.
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Umatilla, OR, Union, OR.
Indian Reservation.
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Clackamas, OR, Jefferson, OR,
Reservation of Oregon. Linn, OR,
Marion, OR, Wasco, OR.
Coquille Indian Tribe.................. Coos, OR, Curry, OR, Douglas,
OR, Jackson, OR, Lane, OR.
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana........... Allen Parish, LA, Elton,
LA.\13\
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Coos, OR \14\, Deshutes, OR,
Indians. Douglas, OR,
Jackson, OR, Josephine, OR,
Klamath, OR, Lane, OR.
Cowlitz Indian Tribe................... Clark, WA, Cowlitz, WA, King,
WA, Lewis, WA, Pierce, WA,
Skamania, WA, Thurston, WA,
Columbia, OR \15\, Kittitas,
WA, Wahkiakum, WA.
Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hand,
Creek Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Hughes, SD, Hyde, SD,
Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD.
Crow Tribe of Montana.................. Big Horn, MT, Carbon, MT,
Treasure, MT \16\,
Yellowstone, MT, Big Horn, WY,
Sheridan, WY.
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians....... Cherokee, NC, Graham, NC,
Haywood, NC, Jackson, NC,
Swain, NC.
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Moody, SD.
Dakota.
Forest County Potawatomi Community, Forest, WI, Marinette, WI,
Wisconsin. Oconto, WI.
Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Blaine, MT, Phillips, MT.
Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana.
[[Page 20391]]
Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Nevada, Malheur, OR.
Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian
Reservation, Nevada and Oregon.
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Arizona.. Maricopa, AZ.
Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, Nevada, Mohave, AZ, San
California and Nevada. Bernardino, CA.
Gila River Indian Community of the Gila Maricopa, AZ, Pinal, AZ.
River Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Antrim, MI \17\, Benzie, MI,
Chippewa Indians, Michigan. Charlevoix, MI,
Grand Traverse, MI, Leelanau,
MI, Manistee, MI.
Hannahville Indian Community, Michigan. Delta, MI, Menominee, MI.
Haskell Indian Health Center........... Douglas, KS.\18\
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Coconino, AZ.
Reservation, Arizona.
Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin........... Adams, WI \19\, Clark, WI,
Columbia, WI, Crawford, WI,
Dane, WI, Eau Claire, WI,
Houston, MN, Jackson, WI,
Juneau, WI, La Crosse, WI,
Marathon, WI, Monroe, WI,
Sauk, WI, Shawano, WI, Vernon,
WI, Wood, WI.
Hoh Indian Tribe....................... Jefferson, WA.
Hopi Tribe of Arizona.................. Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ,
Navajo, AZ.
Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians....... Aroostook, ME.\20\
Hualapai Indian Tribe of the Hualapai Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ,
Indian Reservation, Arizona. Yavapai, AZ.
Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska...... Brown, KS, Doniphan, KS,
Richardson, NE.
Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe.............. Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Jena Band of Choctaw Indians........... Grand Parish, LA \21\, LaSalle
Parish, LA, Rapides Parish,
LA.
Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico.... Archuleta, CO, Rio Arriba, NM,
Sandoval, NM.
Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of the Coconino, AZ, Mohave, AZ, Kane,
Kaibab Indian Reservation, Arizona. UT.
Kalispel Indian Community of the Pend Oreille, WA, Spokane, WA.
Kalispel Reservation.
Kewa Pueblo, New Mexico................ Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan Baraga, MI, Houghton, MI,
Ontonagon, MI.
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas.... Maverick, TX.\22\
Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Brown, KS, Jackson, KS.
Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas.
Klamath Tribes......................... Klamath, OR.\23\
Koi Nation of Northern California Lake, CA, Sonoma, CA.\24\
(formerly known as Lower Lake
Rancheria, California).
Kootenai Tribe of Idaho................ Boundary, ID.
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Sawyer, WI.
Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Iron, WI, Oneida, WI, Vilas,
Chippewa Indians of the Lac du WI.
Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin..
Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Gogebic, MI.
Chippewa Indians of Michigan.
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Kent, MI \25\, Muskegon, MI,
Michigan. Newaygo, MI,
Oceana, MI, Ottawa, MI,
Manistee, MI, Mason, MI,
Wexford, MI, Lake, MI.
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Alcona, MI \25\, Alger, MI,
Indians, Michigan. Alpena, MI, Antrim, MI,
Benzie, MI, Charlevoix, MI,
Cheboygan, MI, Chippewa, MI,
Crawford, MI, Delta, MI,
Emmet, MI, Grand Traverse, MI,
Iosco, MI, Kalkaska, MI,
Leelanau, MI, Luce, MI,
Mackinac, MI, Manistee, MI,
Missaukee, MI, Montmorency,
MI, Ogemaw, MI, Oscoda, MI,
Otsego, MI, Presque Isle, MI,
Schoolcraft, MI, Roscommon,
MI, Wexford, MI.
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule, SD, Buffalo, SD, Hughes,
Brule Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Lyman, SD, Stanley, SD.
Lower Elwha Tribal Community........... Clallam, WA.
Lower Sioux Indian Community in the Redwood, MN, Renville, MN.
State of Minnesota.
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation... Whatcom, WA.
Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Clallam, WA.
Reservation.
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe.............. New London, CT.\26\
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe................ Barnstable, MA, Bristol, MA,
Norfolk, MA, Plymouth, MA,
Suffolk, MA.\27\
Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Allegan, MI \28\, Barry, MI,
Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan. Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI,
Ottawa, MI.
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.... Langlade, WI, Menominee, WI,
Oconto, WI, Shawano, WI.
Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Chaves, NM, Lincoln, NM, Otero,
Reservation, New Mexico. NM.
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians............ Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-
Dade, FL, Hendry, FL.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Itasca, MN, Koochiching, MN,
Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake). St. Louis, MN.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Carlton, MN, St. Louis, MN.
Fond du Lac Band.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Cook, MN.
Grand Portage Band.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Beltrami, MN, Cass, MN,
Leech Lake Band. Hubbard, MN, Itasca, MN.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Aitkin, MN, Kanebec, MN, Mille
Mille Lacs Band. Lacs, MN, Pine, MN.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota Becker, MN, Clearwater, MN,
White Earth Band. Mahnomen, MN, Norman, MN,
Polk, MN.
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians.... Attala, MS, Jasper, MS \29\,
Jones, MS, Kemper, MS, Leake,
MS, Neshoba, MS, Newton, MS,
Noxubee, MS \29\, Scott, MS
\30\, Winston, MS.
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut Fairfield, CT, Hartford, CT,
Litchfield, CT, Middlesex, CT,
New Haven, CT, New London, CT,
Tolland, CT, Windham, CT.
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe............... King, WA, Pierce, WA.
[[Page 20392]]
Narragansett Indian Tribe.............. Washington, RI.\31\
Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Apache, AZ, Bernalillo, NM,
Utah. Cibola, NM,
Coconino, AZ, Kane, UT,
McKinley, NM, Montezuma, CO,
Navajo, AZ, Rio Arriba, NM,
Sandoval, NM, San Juan, NM,
San Juan, UT, Socorro, NM,
Valencia, NM.
Nevada................................. Entire State.\32\
Nez Perce Tribe........................ Clearwater, ID, Idaho, ID,
Latah, ID, Lewis, ID, Nez
Perce, ID.
Nisqually Indian Tribe................. Pierce, WA, Thurston, WA.
Nooksack Indian Tribe.................. Whatcom, WA.
Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Big Horn, MT, Carter, MT \33\,
Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana. Rosebud, MT.
Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation... Box Elder, UT.\34\
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Allegan, MI \35\, Barry, MI,
Potawatomi, Michigan. Branch, MI, Calhoun, MI,
Kalamazoo, MI, Kent, MI,
Ottawa, MI.
Oglala Sioux Tribe..................... Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE,
Custer, SD, Dawes, NE, Fall
River, SD, Jackson, SD \36\,
Mellete, SD, Pennington, SD,
Shannon, SD, Sheridan, NE,
Todd, SD.
Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico.............. Rio Arriba, NM.
Oklahoma............................... Entire State.\37\
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska................ Burt, NE, Cuming, NE, Monona,
IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE.
Oneida Nation of New York.............. Chenango, NY, Cortland, NY,
Herkimer, NY, Madison, NY,
Oneida, NY, Onondaga, NY.
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin... Brown, WI, Outagamie, WI.
Onondaga Nation........................ Onondaga, NY.
Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah............ Iron, UT \38\ Millard, UT,
Sevier, UT, Washington, UT.
Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona.......... Pima, AZ.\39\
Passamaquoddy Tribe.................... Aroostook, ME \40\ \41\,
Washington, ME.
Penobscot Nation....................... Aroostook, ME \40\, Penobscot,
ME.
Poarch Band of Creeks.................. Baldwin, AL \42\, Elmore, AL,
Escambia, AL, Mobile, AL,
Monroe, AL, Escambia, FL.
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Allegan, MI \43\, Berrien, MI,
Michigan and Indiana. Cass, MI, Elkhart, IN,
Kosciusko, IN, La Porte, IN,
Marshall, IN, St. Joseph, IN,
Starke, IN, Van Buren, MI.
Ponca Tribe of Nebraska................ Boyd, NE \44\, Burt, NE,
Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, NE,
Hall, NE, Holt, NE, Knox, NE,
Lancaster, NE, Madison, NE,
Platte, NE, Pottawattomie, IA,
Sarpy, NE, Stanton, NE, Wayne,
NE, Woodbury, IA.
Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe............ Kitsap, WA.
Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation...... Jackson, KS.
Prairie Island Indian Community in the Goodhue, MN.
State of Minnesota.
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico............ Cibola, NM.
Pueblo of Cochiti, New Mexico.......... Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Torrance, NM,
Valencia, NM.
Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico............ Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Cibola, NM,
Sandoval, NM, Valencia, NM.
Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico............ Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico.......... Taos, NM.
Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico......... Rio Arriba, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico....... Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico.... Los Alamos, NM, Rio Arriba, NM,
Sandoval, NM, Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Sandia, New Mexico........... Bernalillo, NM, Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of Santa Ana, New Mexico........ Sandoval, NM.
Pueblo of Santa Clara, New Mexico...... Los Alamos, NM, Sandoval, NM,
Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico............. Colfax, NM, Taos, NM.
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico.......... Santa Fe, NM.
Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico.............. Sandoval, NM.
Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup King, WA, Pierce, WA, Thurston,
Reservation. WA.
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Yuma, AZ, Imperial, CA.
Reservation, California and Arizona.
Quileute Tribe of the Quileute Clallam, WA, Jefferson, WA.
Reservation.
Quinault Indian Nation................. Grays Harbor, WA, Jefferson,
WA.
Rapid City, South Dakota............... Pennington, SD.\45\
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Bayfield, WI.
Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Beltrami, MN, Clearwater, MN,
Minnesota. Koochiching, MN, Lake of the
Woods, MN, Marshall, MN,
Pennington, MN, Polk, MN,
Roseau, MN.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Bennett, SD, Cherry, NE,
Indian Reservation, South Dakota. Gregory, SD, Lyman, SD,
Mellette, SD, Todd, SD, Tripp,
SD.
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas Brown, KS, Richardson, NE.
and Nebraska.
Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Tama, IA.
Iowa.
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Arenac, MI \46\, Clare, MI,
Michigan. Isabella, MI, Midland, MI,
Missaukee, MI.
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe............... Franklin, NY, St. Lawrence, NY.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Maricopa, AZ.
Community of the Salt River
Reservation, Arizona.
[[Page 20393]]
Samish Indian Nation................... Clallam, WA \47\, Island, WA,
Jefferson, WA, King, WA,
Kitsap, WA, Pierce, WA, San
Juan, WA, Skagit, WA,
Snohomish, WA, Whatcom, WA.
San Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Apache, AZ, Cochise, AZ, Gila,
Carlos Reservation, Arizona. AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ,
Pinal, AZ.
San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe of Coconino, AZ, San Juan, UT.
Arizona.
Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska.......... Bon Homme, SD, Knox, NE.
Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe............. Snohomish, WA, Skagit, WA.
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Alger, MI \48\, Chippewa, MI,
Indians, Michigan. Delta, MI, Luce, MI, Mackinac,
MI, Marquette, MI,
Schoolcraft, MI.
Seminole Tribe of Florida.............. Broward, FL, Collier, FL, Miami-
Dade, FL, Glades, FL, Hendry,
FL.
Seneca Nation of Indians............... Allegany, NY, Cattaraugus, NY,
Chautauqua, NY, Erie, NY,
Warren, PA.
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Scott, MN.
Minnesota.
Shinnecock Indian Nation............... Nassau, NY \49\, Suffolk, NY.
Shoalwater Bay Tribe of the Shoalwater Pacific, WA.
Bay Indian Reservation.
Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Hot Springs, WY, Fremont, WY,
Reservation, Wyoming. Sublette, WY.
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Bannock, ID, Bingham, ID,
Hall Reservation. Caribou, ID, Lemhi, ID \50\,
Power, ID.
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Nevada, Owyhee, ID.
Valley Reservation, Nevada.
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Codington, SD, Day, SD, Grant,
Traverse Reservation, South Dakota. SD, Marshall, SD, Richland,
ND, Roberts, SD, Sargent, ND,
Traverse, MN.
Skokomish Indian Tribe................. Mason, WA.
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Tooele, UT.
Utah.
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe................ King, WA \51\, Snohomish, WA,
Pierce, WA, Island, WA, Mason,
WA.
Sokaogon Chippewa Community, Wisconsin. Forest, WI.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Archuleta, CO, La Plata, CO,
Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado. Montezuma, CO, Rio Arriba, NM,
San Juan, NM.
Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota........ Benson, ND, Eddy, ND, Nelson,
ND, Ramsey, ND.
Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Ferry, WA, Lincoln, WA,
Reservation. Stevens, WA.
Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin Mason, WA.
Island Reservation.
St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Barron, WI, Burnett, WI, Pine,
MN, Polk, WI, Washburn, WI.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & Adams, ND, Campbell, SD,
South Dakota. Corson, SD, Dewey, SD, Emmons,
ND, Grant, ND, Morton, ND,
Perkins, SD, Sioux, ND,
Walworth, SD, Ziebach, SD.
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Snohomish, WA.
Washington.
Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin Menominee, WI, Shawano, WI.
Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Kitsap, WA.
Madison Reservation.
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community...... Skagit, WA.
Tejon Indian Tribe..................... Kern, CA.\52\
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Dunn, ND, Mercer, ND, McKenzie,
Berthold Reservation, North Dakota. ND, McLean, ND, Mountrail, ND,
Ward, ND.
Tohono O'odham Nation of Arizona....... Maricopa, AZ, Pima, AZ, Pinal,
AZ.
Tonawanda Band of Seneca............... Genesee, NY, Erie, NY, Niagara,
NY.
Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona.......... Gila, AZ.
Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Divide, ND \53\, McKenzie, ND,
Montana. Williams, ND, Richland, MT,
Roosevelt, MT, Sheridan, MT.
Tulalip Tribes of Washington........... Snohomish, WA.
Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe............. Avoyelles, LA, Rapides, LA.\54\
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Rolette, ND.
Indians of North Dakota.
Tuscarora Nation....................... Niagara, NY.
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota....... Chippewa, MN, Yellow Medicine,
MN.
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe.............. Skagit, WA.
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Carbon, UT, Daggett, UT,
Reservation, Utah. Duchesne, UT, Emery, UT,
Grand, UT, Rio Blanco, CO,
Summit, UT, Uintah, UT, Utah,
UT, Wasatch, UT.
Ute Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain Apache, AZ, La Plata, CO,
Reservation, Colorado, New Mexico & Montezuma, CO, San Juan, NM,
Utah. San Juan, UT.
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). Dukes, MA \55\, Barnstable, MA,
Bristol, MA, Norfolk, MA,
Plymouth, MA, Suffolk, MA.\56\
Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California.... Nevada, California except for
the counties listed in
footnote.
White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache, AZ, Coconino, AZ, Gila,
Apache Reservation, Arizona. AZ, Graham, AZ, Greenlee, AZ,
Navajo, AZ.
Wilton Rancheria, California........... Sacramento, CA.\57\
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska............ Dakota, NE, Dixon, NE, Monona,
IA, Thurston, NE, Wayne, NE,
Woodbury, IA.
Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.... Bon Homme, SD, Boyd, NE,
Charles Mix, SD, Douglas, SD,
Gregory, SD, Hutchinson, SD,
Knox, NE.
Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Yavapai, AZ.
Indian Reservation, Arizona.
Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe.......... Yavapai, AZ.
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo of Texas......... El Paso, TX.\1\
[[Page 20394]]
Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Apache, AZ, Cibola, NM,
Mexico. McKinley, NM, Valencia, NM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 100-89, Restoration Act for Ysleta Del Sur and Alabama
and Coushatta Tribes of Texas establishes service areas for ``members
of the Tribe'' by sections 101(3) and 105(a) for the Pueblo and
sections 201(3) and 206(a) respectively.
\2\ Entire State of Alaska is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR
136.22(a)(1)).
\3\ Aroostook Band of Micmacs was recognized by Congress on November 26,
1991, through the Aroostook Band of Micmac Settlement Act. Aroostook
County, ME, was defined as the SDA.
\4\ Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of
the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these
facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of
funds for the particular facility rather than the eligibility
regulations. Historically services have been provided at Brigham City
Intermountain School Health Center, Utah (Pub. L. 88-358).
\5\ Entire State of California, excluding the counties of Alameda,
Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Marin, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco,
San Mateo, Santa Clara, Kern, Merced, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San
Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Stanislaus, and Ventura,
is designated a CHSDA (25 U.S.C. 1680).
\6\ The counties were recognized after the January 1984 CHSDA FRN was
published, in accordance with Pub. L. 103-116, Catawba Indian Tribe of
South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993, dated October 27,
1993.
\7\ There is no reservation for the Cayuga Nation; the service delivery
area consists of those counties identified by the Cayuga Nation.
\8\ Skamania County, WA, has historically been a part of the Yakama
Service Unit population since 1979.
\9\ In order to carry out the Congressional intent of the Siletz
Restoration Act, Pub. L. 95-195, as expressed in H. Report No. 95-623,
at page 4, members of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of
Oregon residing in these counties are eligible for contract health
services.
\10\ Chelan County, WA, has historically been a part of the Colville
Service Unit population since 1970.
\11\ Pursuant to Pub. L. 98-481 (H. Rept. No. 98-904), Coos, Lower
Umpqua and Siuslaw Restoration Act, members of the Tribe residing in
these counties were specified as eligible for Federal services and
benefits without regard to the existence of a Federal Indian
reservation.
\12\ The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon were
recognized by Pub. L. 98-165 which was signed into law on November 22,
1983, and provides for eligibility in these six counties without
regard to the existence of a reservation.
\13\ The CHSDA for the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana was expanded
administratively by the Director, IHS, through regulation (42 CFR
136.22(6)) to include city limits of Elton, LA.
\14\ Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians recognized by Pub. L. 97-
391, signed into law on December 29, 1983. House Rept. No. 97-862
designates Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Counties as a service area
without regard to the existence of a reservation. The IHS later
administratively expanded the CHSDA to include the counties of Coos,
OR, Deshutes, OR, Klamath, OR, and Lane, OR.
\15\ The Cowlitz Indian Tribe was recognized in July 2002 as documented
at 67 FR 46329, July 12, 2002. The counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes
of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638. The
CHSDA was administratively expanded to included Columbia County, OR,
Kittitas, WA, and Wahkiakum County, WA, as published at 67884 FR
December 21, 2009.
\16\ Treasure County, MT, has historically been a part of the Crow
Service Unit population.
\17\ The counties listed have historically been a part of the Grand
Traverse Service Unit population since 1980.
\18\ Haskell Indian Health Center has historically been a part of Kansas
Service Unit since 1979. Special programs have been established by
Congress irrespective of the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for
services at these facilities is based on the legislative history of
the appropriation of funds for the particular facility rather than the
eligibility regulations. Historically services have been provided at
Haskell Indian Health Center (H. Rept. No. 95-392).
\19\ CHSDA counties for the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin were designated
by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(5)). Dane County, WI, was added to the
reservation by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1986.
\20\ Public Law 97-428 provides that any member of the Houlton Band of
Maliseet Indians in or around the Town of Houlton shall be eligible
without regard to existence of a reservation.
\21\ The Jena Band of Choctaw Indian was Federally acknowledged as
documented at 60 FR 28480, May 31, 1995. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for
the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub.
L. 93-638.
\22\ Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas, formerly known as the Texas
Band of Kickapoo, was recognized by Pub. L. 97-429, signed into law on
January 8, 1983. The Act provides for eligibility for Kickapoo Tribal
members residing in Maverick County without regard to the existence of
a reservation.
\23\ The Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act (Pub. L. 99-398, Sec.
2(2)) states that for the purpose of Federal services and benefits
``members of the tribe residing in Klamath County shall be deemed to
be residing in or near a reservation''.
\24\ The Koi Nation of Northern California, formerly known as the Lower
Lake Rancheria, was reaffirmed by the Secretary of the Bureau of
Indian Affairs on December 29, 2000. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a PRC SDA, for
the purposes of operating a PRC program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub.
L. 93-638.
\25\ The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River
Band of Ottawa Indians Act recognized the Little River Band of Ottawa
Indians and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. Pursuant
to Pub. L. 103-324, Sec.4(b) the counties listed were designated
administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes
of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638.
\26\ Mashantucket Pequot Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 98-134,
signed into law on October 18, 1983, provides a reservation for the
Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe in New London County, CT.
\27\ The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe was recognized in February 2007, as
documented at 72 FR 8007, February 22, 2007. The counties listed were
designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for
the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub.
L. 93-638.
\28\ The Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of
Michigan was recognized in October 1998, as documented at 63 FR 56936,
October 23, 1998. The counties listed were designated administratively
as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a
CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638.
\29\ Members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians residing in
Jasper and Noxubee Counties, MS, are eligible for contract health
services; these two counties were inadvertently omitted from 42 CFR
136.22.
\30\ Scott County, MS, has historically been a part of the Choctaw
Service Unit population since 1970.
\31\ The Narragansett Indian Tribe was recognized by Pub. L. 95-395,
signed into law September 30, 1978. Lands in Washington County, RI,
are now Federally restricted and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
considers them as the Narragansett Indian Reservation.
\32\ Entire State of Nevada is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42 CFR
136.22(a)(2)).
\33\ Carter County, MT, has historically been a part of the Northern
Cheyenne Service Unit population since 1979.
\34\ Land of Box Elder County, Utah, was taken into trust for the
Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation in 1986.
\35\ The Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan, formerly
known as the Huron Band of Potawatomi, Inc., was recognized in
December 1995, as documented at 60 FR 66315, December 21, 1995. The
counties listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638.
\36\ Washabaugh County, SD, merged and became part of Jackson County,
SD, in 1983; both were/are CHSDA counties for the Oglala Sioux Tribe.
\37\ Entire State of Oklahoma is included as a CHSDA by regulation (42
CFR 136.22(a)(3)).
\38\ Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act, Pub. L. 96-227,
provides for the extension of services for the Paiute Indian Tribe of
Utah to these four counties without regard to the existence of a
reservation.
[[Page 20395]]
\39\ Legislative history (H.R. Report No. 95-1021) to Pub. L.95-375,
Extension of Federal Benefits to Pascua Yaqui Indians, Arizona,
expresses congressional intent that lands conveyed to the Pascua Yaqui
Tribe of Arizona pursuant to Act of October 8, 1964. (Pub. L. 88-350)
shall be deemed a Federal Indian Reservation.
\40\ The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-420; H.
Rept. 96-1353) includes the intent of Congress to fund and provide
contract health services to the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot
Nation.
\41\ The Passamaquoddy Tribe has two reservations. The PRC SDA for the
Passamaquoddy Tribe of Indian Township, ME, is Aroostook County, ME,
and Washington County, ME. The PRC SDA for the Passamaquoddy Tribe of
Pleasant Point, ME, is Aroostook County ME, and Washington County, ME,
south of State Route 9.
\42\ Counties in the Service Unit designated by Congress for the Poarch
Band of Creek Indians (see H. Rept. 98-886, June 29, 1984; Cong.
Record, October 10, 1984, Pg. H11929).
\43\ Pub. L. 103-323 restored Federal recognition to the Pokagon Band of
Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana, in 1994 and identified
counties to serve as the SDA.
\44\ The Ponca Restoration Act, Pub. L. 101-484, recognized members of
the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska in Boyd, Douglas, Knox, Madison or
Lancaster counties of Nebraska or Charles Mix county of South Dakota
as residing on or near a reservation. Pub. L. 104-109 made technical
corrections to laws relating to Native Americans and added Burt, Hall,
Holt, Platte, Sarpy, Stanton, and Wayne counties of Nebraska and
Pottawatomie and Woodbury counties of Iowa to the Ponca Tribe of
Nebraska SDA.
\45\ Special programs have been established by Congress irrespective of
the eligibility regulations. Eligibility for services at these
facilities is based on the legislative history of the appropriation of
funds for the particular facility, rather than the eligibility
regulations. Historically services have been provided at Rapid City
(S. Rept. No. 1154, FY 1967 Interior Approp. 89th Cong. 2d Sess.).
\46\ Historically part of Isabella Reservation Area for the Saginaw
Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and the Eastern Michigan Service
Unit population since 1979.
\47\ The Samish Indian Tribe Nation was Federally acknowledged in April
1996 as documented at 61 FR 15825, April 9, 1996. The counties listed
were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA,
for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA,
Pub. L. 93-638.
\48\ CHSDA counties for the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians,
Michigan, were designated by regulation (42 CFR 136.22(a)(4)).
\49\ The Shinnecock Indian Nation was Federally acknowledged in June
2010 as documented at 75 FR 34760, June 18, 2010. The counties listed
were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a CHSDA,
for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the ISDEAA,
Pub. L. 93-638.
\50\ Lemhi County, ID, has historically been a part of the Fort Hall
Service Unit population since 1979.
\51\ The Snoqualmie Indian Tribe was Federally acknowledged in August
1997 as documented at 62 FR 45864, August 29, 1997. The counties
listed were designated administratively as the SDA, to function as a
CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program pursuant to the
ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638.
\52\ On December 30, 2011 the Office of Assistant Secretary-Indian
Affairs reaffirmed the Federal recognition of the Tejon Indian Tribe.
The county listed was designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a CHSDA, for the purposes of operating a CHS program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638.
\53\ The Secretary acting through the Service is directed to provide
contract health services to Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians
that reside in Trenton Service Unit, North Dakota and Montana, in
Divide, Mackenzie, and Williams counties in the state of North Dakota
and the adjoining counties of Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan in the
state of Montana (Sec. 815, Pub. L. 94-437).
\54\ Rapides County, LA, has historically been a part of the Tunica
Biloxi Service Unit population since 1982.
\55\ According to Pub. L. 100-95, Sec. 12, members of the Wampanoag
Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) residing on Martha's Vineyard are deemed
to be living on or near an Indian reservation for the purposes of
eligibility for Federal services.
\56\ The counties listed are designated administratively as the SDA, to
function as a PRC SDA, for the purposes of operating a PRC program
pursuant to the ISDEAA, Pub. L. 93-638.
\57\ The Wilton Rancheria, California had Federal recognition restored
in July 2009 as documented at 74 FR 33468, July 13, 2009. Sacramento
County, CA, was designated administratively as the SDA, to function as
a CHSDA. Sacramento County was not covered when Congress originally
established the State of California as a CHSDA excluding certain
counties including Sacramento County (25 U.S.C. 1680).
Dated: March 31, 2016.
Elizabeth A. Fowler,
Deputy Director for Management Operations, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-07951 Filed 4-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-P