Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 19467-19470 [2016-07028]
Download as PDF
19467
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 65
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
12 CFR Part 1026
Submission of Credit Card Agreements
Under the Truth in Lending Act
(Regulation Z)
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Notice of expiration of
suspension.
AGENCY:
The Truth in Lending Act
(TILA) and Regulation Z require credit
card issuers to submit their currentlyoffered credit card agreements to the
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (Bureau), to be posted on the
Bureau’s Web site. In April 2015, the
Bureau suspended that submission
obligation for a period of one year. That
suspension has expired, and the next
submission is due on the first business
day on or after April 30, 2016 (i.e., May
2, 2016). Credit card issuers should visit
the Bureau’s Web site for instructions
on submitting credit card agreements.
DATES: Credit card issuers are required
to submit to the Bureau the agreements
they offered to the public as of March
31, 2016, on or before May 2, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas L. Devlin, Counsel, or Kristine
M. Andreassen, Senior Counsel, Office
of Regulations, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20552, at 202–435–
7700.
SUMMARY:
In April
2015, the Bureau amended Regulation Z
(12 CFR part 1026), which implements
TILA, and the official interpretation to
that regulation, to temporarily suspend
card issuers’ obligations to submit credit
card agreements to the Bureau for a
period of one year i.e., the four quarterly
submissions due to the Bureau by the
first business day on or after April 30,
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:15 Apr 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
2015; July 31, 2015; October 31, 2015;
and January 31, 2016, respectively.1
The suspension began with the
submission that would have been due
on the first business day on or after
April 30, 2015, and ended with the
submission that would have been due
on the first business day on or after
January 31, 2016. Accordingly, card
issuers must resume submitting
agreements to the Bureau with the
submission due on the first business day
on or after April 30, 2016 (i.e., May 2,
2016), covering credit card agreements
that were offered to the public as of
March 31, 2016.2 Regulation Z
§ 1026.58(g) and comment 58(g)–2
describe which agreements must be
submitted to the Bureau as part of the
submission due on May 2, 2016.
Regulation Z provides that card
issuers shall submit their currentlyoffered agreements ‘‘in the form and
manner specified by the Bureau.’’ 3
Updated submission instructions are
available through the Bureau’s Web
site.4 Card issuers’ obligations to post
currently-offered credit card agreements
on their publicly available Web sites,
and to make agreements for open
accounts available to cardholders, were
not affected by the suspension.5
Dated: March 28, 2016.
Richard Cordray,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2016–07815 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–1047; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–157–AD; Amendment
39–18449; AD 2016–07–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
1 80
FR 21153 (Apr. 17, 2015).
CFR 1026.58(g)(1).
3 12 CFR 1026.58(c)(1).
4 https://www.consumerfinance.gov/credit-cards/
agreements/.
5 12 CFR 1026.58(d), (e), (g)(2).
2 12
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report that, during the
assembly process, several gaps between
the two parts of the girt bar fittings for
the aft passenger doors were found to
exceed tolerances. This AD requires an
inspection of the gap between the two
parts of the girt bar fittings on left-hand
(LH) and right-hand (RH) aft passenger
doors, and corrective actions if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct incorrect gaps
between the girt bar fittings. Detachment
of a girt bar could lead to the separation
of the slide or slide-raft from the
fuselage, making the emergency exit
inoperative, which could impede an
emergency evacuation.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May
10, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of May 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5
61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
1047.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
1047; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is Docket Management Facility,
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
19468
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Airbus Model A318,
A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on January 23, 2015 (80 FR
3533) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The NPRM was
prompted by a report that, during the
assembly process, several gaps between
the two parts of the girt bar fittings for
the aft passenger doors were found to
exceed tolerances. The NPRM proposed
to require an inspection of the gap
between the two parts of the girt bar
fittings on LH and RH aft passenger
doors, and corrective actions if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct incorrect gaps
between the girt bar fittings. Detachment
of a girt bar could lead to the separation
of the slide or slide-raft from the
fuselage, making the emergency exit
inoperative, which could impede an
emergency evacuation.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Reference Later Revision of
Service Information
United Airlines (UAL) proposed to
update the reference to the service
information to Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–53–1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014. UAL also suggested
that the service information update
would also update the effectivity for the
applicable inspection.
We agree to reference the latest
service information, Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1289, Revision 01,
dated August 29, 2014, which updates
the effectivity, and have revised
paragraph (g) of this AD accordingly.
We have also added a new paragraph (i)
to this AD to provide credit for actions
done using Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–53–1289, dated May 28, 2014,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:15 Apr 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
and have redesignated subsequent
paragraphs accordingly.
Request To Clarify the Tolerances for
the Gap Size
UAL requested clarification on the
inspection task’s initial gap requirement
tolerance and the required gap tolerance
for trimmed latches. UAL stated that it
seems the initial inspection in Task
531289–832–601/602–001 of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–53–1289,
Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014,
specifies that a gap equal to or less than
4 millimeters (mm) (0.158 inch) is
acceptable without the need for further
action, but other tasks for post-trimming
and post-latch-replacement inspections
specify replacement if the gap is less
than 1 mm (0.0394 inch). UAL noted
that those inspection tasks reference a
figure in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
53–1289, Revision 01, dated August 29,
2014, which specifies the gap should be
between 1 mm (0.0394 inch) and 4 mm
(0.158 inch). UAL also stated that the
trimming action in Task 531289–831–
601–001 of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–53–1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014, specifies trimming the
latch again if the gap is still greater than
4 mm (0.158 inch), which seems to
conflict with a figure that gives one trim
dimension without any tolerance. UAL
further stated that it should be clearer
that the latch should be trimmed as
many times as required with a
maximum trim dimension of 0.5 mm
(0.0197 inch) until the required gap
tolerance is achieved.
We agree to provide clarification.
Figure A–SBCAA of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1289, Revision 01,
dated August 29, 2014, specifies 0.5 mm
(0.0197 inch) as the limit of the edge
margin, which must not be exceeded
while trimming the latch part during the
gap adjustment. We find that Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–53–1289,
Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014, is
clear on the initial gap tolerance, which
specifies corrective actions if the gap is
initially greater than 4 mm (0.158 inch).
The corrective actions include trimming
and determining the gap after trimming.
If the gap is less than 1 mm (0.0394
inch) or greater than 4 mm (0.158 inch)
after trimming, Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–53–1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014, specifies additional
corrective actions. No change has been
made to this final rule in this regard.
Request To Address Issue of Obsolete
Part Numbers
UAL stated that the NPRM and the
referenced service information (Airbus
Service Bulletins A320–53–1289, dated
May 28, 2014, and Revision 01, dated
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
August 29, 2014) do not identify part
number D531125020000 as obsolete,
which is identified in the illustrated
parts catalog (IPC) as an acceptable part.
UAL pointed out that the referenced
service information introduces new part
numbers D5348027920–200/400 as part
of a corrective action, but does not
specify the new part numbers as a part
of an action to require new or revised
latch or girt bar assembly parts. UAL
asserts that, without a revised IPC or
specific steps in the service information,
there is a risk that the old part number
could be used in the future, and lead to
an incorrect gap after accomplishing the
inspection required by this AD.
We agree to clarify the issue. This AD
refers to Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
53–1289, Revision 01, dated August 29,
2014, as the appropriate source of
service information for accomplishing
the actions required by this AD. We
have determined the information
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–53–1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014, is adequate. In
addition, the requirements of an AD
take precedence over any specifications
in an IPC, which is not an FAAapproved document. We recommend
that operators work with the
manufacturer to ensure there are no
discrepancies in the IPC. It is the
responsibility of operators to apply
necessary controls to maintain the
airplane in accordance with the
required configuration of an AD. No
change has been made to this final rule
in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–53–1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014. The service
information describes procedures for a
detailed inspection of the gap in the girt
bar fittings of the aft passenger doors,
LH and RH sides, and corrective actions.
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 838
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take
about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $213,690, or $255 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions will take
about 4 work-hours and require parts
costing $435, for a cost of $775 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these actions.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
§ 39.13
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:15 Apr 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2016–07–04 Airbus: Amendment 39–18449.
Docket No. FAA–2014–1047; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–157–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective May 10, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus airplanes,
certificated in any category, identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD,
except those on which Airbus Modification
154966 has been embodied during
production.
(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122
airplanes.
(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes.
(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –231,
–232, and –233 airplanes.
(4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that,
during the assembly process, several gaps
between the two parts of the girt bar fittings
for the aft passenger doors were found to
exceed tolerances. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct incorrect gaps between the
girt bar fittings. Detachment of a girt bar
could lead to the separation of the slide or
slide-raft from the fuselage, making the
emergency exit inoperative, which could
impede an emergency evacuation.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19469
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this
AD, within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the
gap in the girt bar fittings of the aft passenger
doors, left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
sides, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–53–1289, Revision 01,
dated August 29, 2014. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Exception
For any airplane that has been modified to
a configuration where one or both LH and RH
aft passenger doors are permanently
inoperative or deactivated: If any aft
passenger door is reactivated, after
reactivation but before further flight, do the
detailed inspection of the reactivated aft
passenger door(s) and all applicable
corrective actions, as required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1289, dated May 28, 2014,
which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
19470
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(3) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0178, dated July 25, 2014, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–1047.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1289,
Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
20, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–07028 Filed 4–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:15 Apr 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–5036; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–180–AD; Amendment
39–18453; AD 2016–07–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Examining the AD Docket
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for a
certain The Boeing Company Model
DC–9–83 (MD–83) airplane. This AD
requires installing fuel level float and
pressure switch in-line fuses, and doing
applicable wiring changes, on the left,
right, and center wing forward spars,
forward auxiliary fuel tank, and aft
auxiliary fuel tank. This AD was
prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the potential
of ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective April 20,
2016.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 20, 2016.
We must receive comments on this
AD by May 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, 3855
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019,
Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 2; fax 206–
766–5683; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5036.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5036; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140L, FAA,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone:
562–627–5262; fax: 562–627–5210;
email: samuel.lee@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large
transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
service history of airplanes subject to
those regulations, and existing
maintenance practices for fuel tank
systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and
Maintenance and Inspection
Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7,
2001). In addition to new airworthiness
standards for transport airplanes and
new maintenance requirements, this
rule included Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 (66 FR
23086, May 7, 2001) requires certain
type design (i.e., type certificate (TC)
and supplemental type certificate (STC))
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19467-19470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07028]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-1047; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-157-AD;
Amendment 39-18449; AD 2016-07-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report that, during the assembly process, several gaps
between the two parts of the girt bar fittings for the aft passenger
doors were found to exceed tolerances. This AD requires an inspection
of the gap between the two parts of the girt bar fittings on left-hand
(LH) and right-hand (RH) aft passenger doors, and corrective actions if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrect gaps
between the girt bar fittings. Detachment of a girt bar could lead to
the separation of the slide or slide-raft from the fuselage, making the
emergency exit inoperative, which could impede an emergency evacuation.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May 10, 2016.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 10,
2016.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
1047.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
1047; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility,
[[Page 19468]]
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus Model A318,
A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on January 23, 2015 (80 FR 3533) (``the NPRM''). The
NPRM was prompted by a report that, during the assembly process,
several gaps between the two parts of the girt bar fittings for the aft
passenger doors were found to exceed tolerances. The NPRM proposed to
require an inspection of the gap between the two parts of the girt bar
fittings on LH and RH aft passenger doors, and corrective actions if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrect gaps
between the girt bar fittings. Detachment of a girt bar could lead to
the separation of the slide or slide-raft from the fuselage, making the
emergency exit inoperative, which could impede an emergency evacuation.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received. The following
presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to
each comment.
Request To Reference Later Revision of Service Information
United Airlines (UAL) proposed to update the reference to the
service information to Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision
01, dated August 29, 2014. UAL also suggested that the service
information update would also update the effectivity for the applicable
inspection.
We agree to reference the latest service information, Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014,
which updates the effectivity, and have revised paragraph (g) of this
AD accordingly. We have also added a new paragraph (i) to this AD to
provide credit for actions done using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1289, dated May 28, 2014, and have redesignated subsequent paragraphs
accordingly.
Request To Clarify the Tolerances for the Gap Size
UAL requested clarification on the inspection task's initial gap
requirement tolerance and the required gap tolerance for trimmed
latches. UAL stated that it seems the initial inspection in Task
531289-832-601/602-001 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289,
Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014, specifies that a gap equal to or
less than 4 millimeters (mm) (0.158 inch) is acceptable without the
need for further action, but other tasks for post-trimming and post-
latch-replacement inspections specify replacement if the gap is less
than 1 mm (0.0394 inch). UAL noted that those inspection tasks
reference a figure in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision
01, dated August 29, 2014, which specifies the gap should be between 1
mm (0.0394 inch) and 4 mm (0.158 inch). UAL also stated that the
trimming action in Task 531289-831-601-001 of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014, specifies trimming
the latch again if the gap is still greater than 4 mm (0.158 inch),
which seems to conflict with a figure that gives one trim dimension
without any tolerance. UAL further stated that it should be clearer
that the latch should be trimmed as many times as required with a
maximum trim dimension of 0.5 mm (0.0197 inch) until the required gap
tolerance is achieved.
We agree to provide clarification. Figure A-SBCAA of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014, specifies
0.5 mm (0.0197 inch) as the limit of the edge margin, which must not be
exceeded while trimming the latch part during the gap adjustment. We
find that Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014, is clear on the initial gap tolerance, which specifies
corrective actions if the gap is initially greater than 4 mm (0.158
inch). The corrective actions include trimming and determining the gap
after trimming. If the gap is less than 1 mm (0.0394 inch) or greater
than 4 mm (0.158 inch) after trimming, Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1289, Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014, specifies additional
corrective actions. No change has been made to this final rule in this
regard.
Request To Address Issue of Obsolete Part Numbers
UAL stated that the NPRM and the referenced service information
(Airbus Service Bulletins A320-53-1289, dated May 28, 2014, and
Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014) do not identify part number
D531125020000 as obsolete, which is identified in the illustrated parts
catalog (IPC) as an acceptable part. UAL pointed out that the
referenced service information introduces new part numbers D5348027920-
200/400 as part of a corrective action, but does not specify the new
part numbers as a part of an action to require new or revised latch or
girt bar assembly parts. UAL asserts that, without a revised IPC or
specific steps in the service information, there is a risk that the old
part number could be used in the future, and lead to an incorrect gap
after accomplishing the inspection required by this AD.
We agree to clarify the issue. This AD refers to Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated August 29, 2014, as the
appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the actions
required by this AD. We have determined the information specified in
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated August 29,
2014, is adequate. In addition, the requirements of an AD take
precedence over any specifications in an IPC, which is not an FAA-
approved document. We recommend that operators work with the
manufacturer to ensure there are no discrepancies in the IPC. It is the
responsibility of operators to apply necessary controls to maintain the
airplane in accordance with the required configuration of an AD. No
change has been made to this final rule in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014. The service information describes procedures for a
detailed inspection of the gap in the girt bar fittings of the aft
passenger doors, LH and RH sides, and corrective actions.
[[Page 19469]]
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 838 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
of this AD on U.S. operators to be $213,690, or $255 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 4 work-hours and require parts costing $435, for a cost of
$775 per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-07-04 Airbus: Amendment 39-18449. Docket No. FAA-2014-1047;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-157-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective May 10, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus airplanes, certificated in any
category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD,
except those on which Airbus Modification 154966 has been embodied
during production.
(1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
(2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes.
(4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that, during the assembly
process, several gaps between the two parts of the girt bar fittings
for the aft passenger doors were found to exceed tolerances. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrect gaps between the
girt bar fittings. Detachment of a girt bar could lead to the
separation of the slide or slide-raft from the fuselage, making the
emergency exit inoperative, which could impede an emergency
evacuation.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD, within 36 months
after the effective date of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the
gap in the girt bar fittings of the aft passenger doors, left-hand
(LH) and right-hand (RH) sides, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated August 29,
2014. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Exception
For any airplane that has been modified to a configuration where
one or both LH and RH aft passenger doors are permanently
inoperative or deactivated: If any aft passenger door is
reactivated, after reactivation but before further flight, do the
detailed inspection of the reactivated aft passenger door(s) and all
applicable corrective actions, as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1289, dated May 28, 2014, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without
[[Page 19470]]
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests
identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or
tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(3) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2014-
0178, dated July 25, 2014, for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-1047.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1289, Revision 01, dated
August 29, 2014.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 20, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-07028 Filed 4-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P