Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 18741-18743 [2016-07190]
Download as PDF
18741
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 63
Friday, April 1, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–5038; Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–029–AD; Amendment
39–18455; AD 2016–07–10]
Examining the AD Docket
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 787–8 and 787–
9 airplanes. This AD requires revising
the airplane flight manual (AFM) to
instruct the flightcrew to avoid abrupt
flight control inputs in response to
sudden drops in airspeed, and to
reinforce the need to disconnect the
autopilot before making any manual
flight control inputs. This AD was
prompted by reports indicating that in
certain weather conditions with high
moisture content or possible icing,
erroneous low airspeed may be
displayed to the flightcrew before
detection and annunciation via engineindicating and crew-alerting system
(EICAS) messages. We are issuing this
AD to ensure that the flightcrew avoids
abrupt pilot control inputs in response
to an unrealistic, sudden drop in
displayed airspeed at high actual
airspeed. Abrupt pilot control inputs in
this condition could exceed the
structural capability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective April 14,
2016.
We must receive comments on this
AD by May 16, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Mar 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
5038; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fnu
Winarto, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6659; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We have received three reports of inservice displayed airspeed anomalies on
Model 787 airplanes. We continue to
investigate this issue with Boeing;
however, the anomalous behavior is
consistent with significant water
ingestion or simultaneous icing of two
or three of the three pitot probes. During
each of the reported events, the
displayed airspeed rapidly dropped
significantly below the actual airplane
airspeed. In normal operations, the air
data reference system supplies the same
airspeed to both the captain and first
officer primary flight displays. During
one in-service event, with autopilot
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
engaged, the pilot overrode the engaged
autopilot in response to the displayed
erroneous low airspeed and made
significant nose-down manual control
inputs. In this situation, there is the
potential for large pilot control inputs at
high actual airspeed, which could cause
the airplane to exceed its structural
capability.
FAA’s Determination
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
AD Requirements
This AD requires revising the AFM to
add a ‘‘Non-normal Procedure’’ for
‘‘Airspeed Drop’’ that instructs the
flightcrew to avoid abrupt flight control
inputs, and reinforces the need to
disconnect the autopilot prior to making
any manual flight control inputs.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action.
The airplane manufacturer is currently
developing modifications to the display
and crew alerting system, flight control
system, and air data system that will
address the unsafe condition identified
in this AD. Once these modifications are
developed, approved, and available, we
may consider additional rulemaking.
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD. The FAA has found that the risk to
the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because large, abrupt pilot control
inputs in response to an unrealistic,
sudden drop in displayed airspeed at
high actual airspeed could exceed the
structural capability of the airplane.
Therefore, we find that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
are impracticable and that good cause
exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and
was not preceded by notice and an
opportunity for public comment.
However, we invite you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
18742
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
this AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include the docket number
FAA–2016–5038 and Directorate
Identifier 2016–NM–029–AD at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 43
airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
the following costs to comply with this
AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
AFM revision ...................................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
$0
$85
$3,655
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14:14 Mar 31, 2016
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Jkt 238001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2016–07–10 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–18455; Docket No.
FAA–2016–5038; Directorate Identifier
2016–NM–029–AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 14, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 787–8 and 787–9 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27, Flight controls.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports
indicating that in certain weather conditions
with high moisture content or possible icing,
erroneous low airspeed data may be
displayed to the flightcrew before detection
and annunciation via engine-indicating and
crew-alerting system (EICAS) messages. We
are issuing this AD to ensure that the
flightcrew avoids abrupt pilot control inputs
in response to an unrealistic, sudden drop in
displayed airspeed at high actual airspeed.
Abrupt pilot control inputs could exceed the
structural capability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision:
Operating Procedures
Within 15 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the applicable Boeing 787
AFM to add a ‘‘Non-normal Procedure’’ that
includes the information in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD. This may be done
by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Fnu Winarto, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6659; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
25, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–07190 Filed 3–31–16; 8:45 am]
‘‘CFTC’’) is amending existing
Commission regulations to establish an
alternative to fingerprinting to evaluate
the fitness of natural persons who are
required to submit fingerprints under
the Commission’s regulations and who
have not resided in the United States
since reaching 18 years of age (‘‘Final
Rule’’).
DATES: The Final Rule is effective on
May 2, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Driscoll, Associate Chief
Counsel, 202–418–5544, kdriscoll@
cftc.gov; Jacob Chachkin, Special
Counsel, 202–418–5496, jchachkin@
cftc.gov; or Adam Kezsbom, Special
Counsel, 202–418–5372, akezsbom@
cftc.gov, Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Proposal
On January 12, 2016, the Commission
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (‘‘Proposal’’) 1 to amend the
requirement that, pursuant to the
registration process for determining a
registrant’s fitness in part 3 of the
Commission’s regulations, natural
persons 2 that wish to be principals 3 or
associated persons 4 of Commission
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 3
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 3038–AE16
Alternative to Fingerprinting
Requirement for Foreign Natural
Persons
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Mar 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
1 Alternative to Fingerprinting Requirement for
Foreign Natural Persons, 81 FR 1359 (Jan. 12, 2016).
2 As used herein, the terms ‘‘natural person’’ and
‘‘individual’’ have the same meaning.
3 See the definition of principal in Commission
regulation 3.1(a). 17 CFR 3.1(a).
4 An ‘‘associated person’’ is any natural person
who is associated in certain capacities with a
futures commission merchant (‘‘FCM’’), retail
foreign exchange dealer (‘‘RFED’’), introducing
broker (‘‘IB’’), commodity pool operator (‘‘CPO’’),
commodity trading advisor (‘‘CTA’’), swap dealer
(‘‘SD’’), major swap participant (‘‘MSP’’), or
leverage transaction merchant (‘‘LTM’’). 17 CFR
1.3(aa).
For the definitions of these registration categories
(other than RFED), see Section 1a of the Commodity
Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’ or ‘‘Act’’) and Commission
regulation 1.3. 7 U.S.C. 1a and 17 CFR 1.3. For the
definition of RFED, see Commission regulation
5.1(h). 17 CFR 5.1(h).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
registrants,5 or who are responsible for
entry of orders from an FB’s or FT’s own
account, submit their fingerprints (the
‘‘Fingerprinting Requirement’’).6 The
Proposal contemplated adding a new
paragraph (e) to the existing list of
exemptions from the Fingerprinting
Requirement in § 3.21 7 to, among other
things, codify and clarify the alternative
to the Fingerprinting Requirement
provided by CFTC Staff Letter No. 12–
49 8 and CFTC Staff Letter No. 13–29 9
(‘‘DSIO No-Action Letters’’). In
particular, the Commission proposed
5 Subject to certain exceptions and exclusions,
persons engaging in specified activities involving
commodity interests are required pursuant to the
CEA and/or Commission regulations to register with
the Commission in certain registration categories.
These include registration as an FCM, RFED, IB,
CPO, CTA, SD, MSP, LTM, floor broker (‘‘FB’’), and
floor trader (‘‘FT’’). For the definitions of FB and
FT, see Section 1a of the CEA and Commission
regulation 1.3. 7 U.S.C. 1a and 17 CFR 1.3.
6 Currently, the Commission may, directly or
indirectly, require fingerprinting pursuant to
Commission regulations 3.10(a)(2); 3.11(a)(1);
3.12(c)(3), d(2), f(3), or (i)(3); 3.40(a)(1), (a)(2), or (b);
3.44(a)(5) or (c); or 3.46(a)(3). 17 CFR 3.10(a)(2);
3.11(a)(1); 3.12(c)(3), d(2), f(3), and (i)(3); 3.40(a)(1),
(a)(2), and (b); 3.44(a)(5) and (c); and 3.46(a)(3).
In support of its initial promulgation of the
fingerprinting requirements, the Commission stated
that these requirements ‘‘are necessary to permit
improvements in the Commission’s background
checking of applicants for registration, to permit
positive identification of certain individuals with
common names, to reduce the number of
applications filed by individuals who are unfit for
registration, and to facilitate fitness reviews of
registrants on a spot and periodic basis.’’ See
Revision of Registration Regulations; Final Rules;
Designation of New Part, 45 FR 80485, 80485 (Dec.
5, 1980).
7 Commission regulation 3.21 provides
exemptions to the Fingerprinting Requirement,
subject to certain conditions, for persons whose
fingerprints have recently been identified and
processed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
for persons whose application for initial registration
with the Commission in any capacity was recently
granted, for persons that have a current Form 8–R
on file with the Commission or National Futures
Association (‘‘NFA’’), and for principals that are
outside directors. 17 CFR 3.21.
8 CFTC Staff Letter No. 12–49 (Dec. 11, 2012),
available at https://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/
public/@lrlettergeneral/documents/letter/12-49.pdf.
9 CFTC Staff Letter No. 13–29 (Jun. 21, 2013),
available at https://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/
public/@lrlettergeneral/documents/letter/13-29.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
ER01AP16.000
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (i) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
18743
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18741-18743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07190]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2016 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 18741]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-5038; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-029-AD;
Amendment 39-18455; AD 2016-07-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. This AD requires
revising the airplane flight manual (AFM) to instruct the flightcrew to
avoid abrupt flight control inputs in response to sudden drops in
airspeed, and to reinforce the need to disconnect the autopilot before
making any manual flight control inputs. This AD was prompted by
reports indicating that in certain weather conditions with high
moisture content or possible icing, erroneous low airspeed may be
displayed to the flightcrew before detection and annunciation via
engine-indicating and crew-alerting system (EICAS) messages. We are
issuing this AD to ensure that the flightcrew avoids abrupt pilot
control inputs in response to an unrealistic, sudden drop in displayed
airspeed at high actual airspeed. Abrupt pilot control inputs in this
condition could exceed the structural capability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective April 14, 2016.
We must receive comments on this AD by May 16, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
5038; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone:
800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fnu Winarto, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6659; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We have received three reports of in-service displayed airspeed
anomalies on Model 787 airplanes. We continue to investigate this issue
with Boeing; however, the anomalous behavior is consistent with
significant water ingestion or simultaneous icing of two or three of
the three pitot probes. During each of the reported events, the
displayed airspeed rapidly dropped significantly below the actual
airplane airspeed. In normal operations, the air data reference system
supplies the same airspeed to both the captain and first officer
primary flight displays. During one in-service event, with autopilot
engaged, the pilot overrode the engaged autopilot in response to the
displayed erroneous low airspeed and made significant nose-down manual
control inputs. In this situation, there is the potential for large
pilot control inputs at high actual airspeed, which could cause the
airplane to exceed its structural capability.
FAA's Determination
We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
AD Requirements
This AD requires revising the AFM to add a ``Non-normal Procedure''
for ``Airspeed Drop'' that instructs the flightcrew to avoid abrupt
flight control inputs, and reinforces the need to disconnect the
autopilot prior to making any manual flight control inputs.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action. The airplane manufacturer is
currently developing modifications to the display and crew alerting
system, flight control system, and air data system that will address
the unsafe condition identified in this AD. Once these modifications
are developed, approved, and available, we may consider additional
rulemaking.
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because
large, abrupt pilot control inputs in response to an unrealistic,
sudden drop in displayed airspeed at high actual airspeed could exceed
the structural capability of the airplane. Therefore, we find that
notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than
30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or
arguments about
[[Page 18742]]
this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include the docket number FAA-2016-5038 and Directorate
Identifier 2016-NM-029-AD at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 43 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFM revision........................ 1 work-hour x $85 per $0 $85 $3,655
hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2016-07-10 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18455; Docket No. FAA-
2016-5038; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-029-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 14, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports indicating that in certain
weather conditions with high moisture content or possible icing,
erroneous low airspeed data may be displayed to the flightcrew
before detection and annunciation via engine-indicating and crew-
alerting system (EICAS) messages. We are issuing this AD to ensure
that the flightcrew avoids abrupt pilot control inputs in response
to an unrealistic, sudden drop in displayed airspeed at high actual
airspeed. Abrupt pilot control inputs could exceed the structural
capability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision: Operating Procedures
Within 15 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
applicable Boeing 787 AFM to add a ``Non-normal Procedure'' that
includes the information in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD.
This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.
[[Page 18743]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01AP16.000
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Fnu Winarto,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:
425-917-6659; fax: 425-917-6590; email: fnu.winarto@faa.gov.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 25, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-07190 Filed 3-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P