Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review; Comment Request; Filings for Reconsideration, 18656-18657 [2016-07285]

Download as PDF 18656 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices radiological accidents; and (6) the requirements from which an exemption is sought involve: Surety, insurance, or indemnity requirements. Utilizing the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, the NRC has determined that approval of the exemption request involves no significant hazards consideration because reducing the licensee’s onsite property damage insurance for CR–3 does not: (1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The exempted financial protection regulation is unrelated to the operation of CR–3. Accordingly, there is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite; and no significant increase in individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure. The exempted regulation is not associated with construction, so there is no significant construction impact. The exempted regulation does not concern the source term (i.e., potential amount of radiation in an accident), nor mitigation. Therefore, there is no significant increase in the potential for, or consequences of, a radiological accident. In addition, there would be no significant impacts to biota, water resources, historic properties, cultural resources, or socioeconomic conditions in the region. The requirement for onsite property damage insurance may be viewed as involving surety, insurance, or indemnity matters. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and 51.22(c)(25), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the approval of this exemption request. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES V. Conclusions Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the requested exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants DEF an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1), to permit the licensee to reduce its onsite property damage insurance to a level of $50 million. The exemption is effective upon issuance. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Mar 30, 2016 Jkt 238001 Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of March 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. John R. Tappert, Director, Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2016–07305 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review; Comment Request; Filings for Reconsideration Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. ACTION: Notice of intent to request extension of OMB approval of information collection. AGENCY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (‘‘PBGC’’) intends to request the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) to extend approval without change, under the Paperwork Reduction Act, of a collection of information under its regulation on Rules for Administrative Review of Agency Decisions. This notice informs the public of PBGC’s intent and solicits public comment on the collection of information. SUMMARY: Comments should be submitted by May 31, 2016. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web site instructions for submitting comments. Email: paperwork.comments@ pbgc.gov. Fax: 202–326–4224. Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory Affairs Group, Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026. PBGC will make all comments available on its Web site, www.pbgc.gov. Copies of the collection of information may also be obtained without charge by writing to the Disclosure Division of the Office of the General Counsel of PBGC at the above address or by visiting the Disclosure Division or calling 202–326–4040 during normal business hours. (TTY and TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be connected to 202–326–4040.) PBGC’s regulation on Administrative DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Appeals may be accessed on PBGC’s Web site at www.pbgc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah C. Murphy, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, or Donald McCabe, Attorney, Regulatory Affairs Group, Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005– 4026, 202–326–4400. (For TTY and TDD, call 800–877–8339 and request connection to 202–326–4024.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PBGC’s regulation on Rules for Administrative Review of Agency Decisions (29 CFR part 4003) prescribes rules governing the issuance of initial determinations by PBGC and the procedures for requesting and obtaining administrative review of initial determinations through reconsideration or appeal. Subpart A of the regulation specifies which initial determinations are subject to reconsideration. Subpart C prescribes rules on who may request reconsideration, when to make such a request, where to submit it, form and content of reconsideration requests, and other matters relating to reconsiderations. Any person aggrieved by an initial determination of PBGC under § 4003.1(b)(1) (determinations that a plan is covered by section 4021 of ERISA), § 4003.1(b)(2) (determinations concerning premiums, interest, and late payment penalties under section 4007 of ERISA), § 4003.1(b)(3) (determinations concerning voluntary terminations), § 4003.1(b)(4) (determinations concerning allocation of assets under section 4044 of ERISA), or § 4003.1(b)(5) (determinations with respect to penalties under section 4071 of ERISA) may request reconsideration of the initial determination. Requests for reconsideration must be in writing, be clearly designated as requests for reconsideration, contain a statement of the grounds for reconsideration and the relief sought, and contain or reference all pertinent information. OMB has approved the reconsiderations collection of information under control number 1212–0063 through July 31, 2016. PBGC intends to request that OMB extend approval without change of this collection of information for three years. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. PBGC estimates that an average of about 230 appellants per year will respond to this collection of information. PBGC further estimates E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM 31MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices that the average annual burden of this collection of information is about onehalf hour and about $665 per person, with an average total annual burden of about 109 hours and about $153,000. PBGC is soliciting public comments to— • Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Issued in Washington, DC, this 25 day of March 2016. Judith Starr, General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. 2016–07285 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–02–P OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Notice of Submission for Approval: Information Collection 3206–0150; Fingerprint Chart Standard Form 87, SF 87 U.S. Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for comments. AGENCY: The Federal Investigative Services (FIS), U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is notifying the general public and other Federal agencies that OPM is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval of a revised information collection, control number 3206–0150, Fingerprint Chart Standard Form 87, SF 87. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35), as amended by the Clinger-Cohen Act (Pub. L. 104– 106), OPM is providing an additional 30 days for public comments. OPM previously solicited comments for this collection, with a 60-day public mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Mar 30, 2016 Jkt 238001 comment period, at 81 FR 2924 (January 19, 2016). DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until May 2, 2016. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of Personnel Management or sent via electronic mail to oira_submission@ omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–6974. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of this information collection, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by contacting Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, Attention: Donna McLeod or by electronic mail at FISFormsComments@opm.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that OPM has submitted to OMB a request for review and clearance of a revised information collection, control number 3206–0150, Fingerprint Chart Standard Form 87, SF 87. The public has an additional 30-day opportunity to comment. The SF 87 is a fingerprint card, which is utilized to conduct a national criminal history check, which is a component of the background investigation. The SF 87 is completed by individuals who are under consideration for appointment to or retention in a Federal position or performance of work on behalf of the Government. The SF 87 fingerprint chart is used in background investigations to establish that such persons are eligible for logical and physical access to Government facilities and systems; suitable or fit to perform work for, on behalf of, the Federal Government; suitable for employment or retention in a public trust position, eligible for employment or retention in a national security position, and/or eligible for access to classified national security information. The SF 87 form is only utilized when a hardcopy fingerprint chart must be obtained, as opposed to the electronic collection of fingerprints. Due to the SF 87 form’s small size and the fact that it may be maintained in multiple systems of records, it does not list all potentially applicable routine uses under the Privacy Act. Accordingly 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3)(C) requires that an agency issuing the SF 87 form must also give the subject a copy of the routine uses for the applicable system of records PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 18657 and FBI’s Privacy Act Notice and Privacy Rights. OPM proposes to add clarifying language to the Purpose, Authority, and Privacy Statement to further explain uses of the form. The 60-day Federal Register Notice was published on January 19, 2016 (81 FR 2924). One comment was received from an individual from the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). DoDEA commented that without using Fingerprint Chart Standard Form 87, an alternative form or process should be made available to comply with the Crime Control Act of 1990 (Act, and House Bill (HB) 737). OPM did not accept DoDEA’s recommendation. OPM already does provide for the electronic collection of fingerprints. Use of the SF 87 is limited only to situations where electronic collection of fingerprints cannot be utilized. Analysis Agency: Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Title: Fingerprint Chart Standard Form 87, SF 87. OMB Number: 3206–0150. Affected Public: Individuals who are under consideration for appointment to or retention in a Federal position or performance of work on behalf of the Government. Number of Respondents: 52,318. Estimated Time per Respondent: 5 minutes. Total Burden Hours: 4,360. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Beth F. Cobert, Acting Director. [FR Doc. 2016–07406 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–53–P POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement Postal ServiceTM. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Effective date: March 31, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 25, 2016, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM 31MRN1

Agencies

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18656-18657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION


Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review; 
Comment Request; Filings for Reconsideration

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of intent to request extension of OMB approval of 
information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (``PBGC'') intends to 
request the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') to extend 
approval without change, under the Paperwork Reduction Act, of a 
collection of information under its regulation on Rules for 
Administrative Review of Agency Decisions. This notice informs the 
public of PBGC's intent and solicits public comment on the collection 
of information.

DATES: Comments should be submitted by May 31, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
Web site instructions for submitting comments.
    Email: paperwork.comments@pbgc.gov.
    Fax: 202-326-4224.
    Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory Affairs Group, Office of the 
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026.
    PBGC will make all comments available on its Web site, 
www.pbgc.gov.
    Copies of the collection of information may also be obtained 
without charge by writing to the Disclosure Division of the Office of 
the General Counsel of PBGC at the above address or by visiting the 
Disclosure Division or calling 202-326-4040 during normal business 
hours. (TTY and TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll-free 
at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4040.) PBGC's 
regulation on Administrative Appeals may be accessed on PBGC's Web site 
at www.pbgc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah C. Murphy, Deputy Assistant 
General Counsel, or Donald McCabe, Attorney, Regulatory Affairs Group, 
Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 
1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026, 202-326-4400. (For TTY 
and TDD, call 800-877-8339 and request connection to 202-326-4024.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PBGC's regulation on Rules for 
Administrative Review of Agency Decisions (29 CFR part 4003) prescribes 
rules governing the issuance of initial determinations by PBGC and the 
procedures for requesting and obtaining administrative review of 
initial determinations through reconsideration or appeal. Subpart A of 
the regulation specifies which initial determinations are subject to 
reconsideration. Subpart C prescribes rules on who may request 
reconsideration, when to make such a request, where to submit it, form 
and content of reconsideration requests, and other matters relating to 
reconsiderations.
    Any person aggrieved by an initial determination of PBGC under 
Sec.  4003.1(b)(1) (determinations that a plan is covered by section 
4021 of ERISA), Sec.  4003.1(b)(2) (determinations concerning premiums, 
interest, and late payment penalties under section 4007 of ERISA), 
Sec.  4003.1(b)(3) (determinations concerning voluntary terminations), 
Sec.  4003.1(b)(4) (determinations concerning allocation of assets 
under section 4044 of ERISA), or Sec.  4003.1(b)(5) (determinations 
with respect to penalties under section 4071 of ERISA) may request 
reconsideration of the initial determination. Requests for 
reconsideration must be in writing, be clearly designated as requests 
for reconsideration, contain a statement of the grounds for 
reconsideration and the relief sought, and contain or reference all 
pertinent information.
    OMB has approved the reconsiderations collection of information 
under control number 1212-0063 through July 31, 2016. PBGC intends to 
request that OMB extend approval without change of this collection of 
information for three years. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    PBGC estimates that an average of about 230 appellants per year 
will respond to this collection of information. PBGC further estimates

[[Page 18657]]

that the average annual burden of this collection of information is 
about one-half hour and about $665 per person, with an average total 
annual burden of about 109 hours and about $153,000.
    PBGC is soliciting public comments to--
     Evaluate whether the collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submission of responses.

    Issued in Washington, DC, this 25 day of March 2016.
Judith Starr,
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2016-07285 Filed 3-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7709-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.