Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon, 17438-17439 [2016-06979]
Download as PDF
17438
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Notices
Comment VII Rescission of Review with
Respect to NTACO Corporation and Nam
Phuong Seafood Company Ltd.
Comment VIII Combination Rates
Comment IX Surrogate Value for Fish Feed
Comment X Surrogate Value for Fingerlings
Comment XI Surrogate Value for Water
Comment XII Application of Marine
Insurance
Comment XIII Packing
A. Packing Type Should Not be a Physical
Characteristic
B. Tafishco’s Packing Materials Factors of
Production Usage Rates
C. Surrogate Value for Strap
D. Surrogate Value for Tape
Comment XIV By-Products
A. Whether to Value Certain By-products
B. Surrogate Value for Fish Waste
Comment XV Customs Instructions
[FR Doc. 2016–07072 Filed 3–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE201
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Final Programmatic
Damage Assessment and Restoration
Plan and Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
PDARP/PEIS)
AGENCY:
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a
Record of Decision.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), notice is hereby given that the
Deepwater Horizon Federal and State
natural resource trustee agencies
(Trustees) have issued a Record of
Decision (ROD) for the Final
Programmatic Damage Assessment and
Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS). Based
on the Trustees’ injury determination
established in the Final PDARP/PEIS,
the ROD sets forth the basis for the
Trustees’ decision to select Alternative
A: Comprehensive Integrated Ecosystem
Alternative. The Trustees’ selection of
this alternative includes the funding
allocations established in the Final
PDARP/PEIS.
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You
may download the ROD at https://www.
gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov or https://
www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon. You
may also view the ROD at any of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:43 Mar 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
public repositories listed at https://www.
gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Courtney Groeneveld at gulfspill.
restoration@noaa.gov, mail to:
fw4coastalDERPcomments@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 17, 2011, the Trustees
initiated a 90-day formal scoping and
public comment period for the Draft
PDARP/PEIS (76 FR 9327) through a
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Begin
Restoration Scoping and Prepare a Gulf
Spill Restoration Planning PEIS. The
Trustees conducted the scoping in
accordance with OPA (15 CFR
990.14(d)), NEPA (40 CFR 1501.7), and
State authorities. That NOI requested
public input to identify and evaluate a
range of restoration types that could be
used to fully compensate the public for
the environmental and recreational use
damages caused by the spill, as well as
develop procedures to select and
implement restoration projects that will
compensate the public for the natural
resource damages caused by the spill.
As part of the scoping process, the
Trustees hosted public meetings across
all the Gulf States during Spring 2011.
A Notice of Availability of the Draft
PDARP/PEIS was published in the
Federal Register on October 5, 2015 (80
FR 60126). The Draft PDARP/PEIS
presented the assessment of impacts of
the Deepwater Horizon incident on
natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico
and on the services those resources
provide, and determined the restoration
needed to compensate the public for
these impacts. The Draft PDARP/PEIS
presented four programmatic
alternatives evaluated in accordance
with OPA and NEPA:
• Alternative A (Preferred
Alternative): Comprehensive Integrated
Ecosystem Restoration Plan based on
programmatic Trustee goals;
• Alternative B: Resource-Specific
Restoration Plan based on programmatic
Trustee goals;
• Alternative C: Continued Injury
Assessment and Defer Comprehensive
Restoration Plan; and
• Alternative D: No Action/Natural
Recovery.
The Trustees provided the public
with 60 days to review and comment on
the Draft PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees
held public meetings in Houma, LA;
Long Beach, MS; New Orleans, LA;
Mobile, AL; Pensacola, FL; St.
Petersburg, FL; Galveston, TX; and
Washington, DC, to facilitate public
understanding of the document and
provide opportunity for public
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comment. Additionally, the Trustees
solicited public input through a variety
of mechanisms, including electronic
communications, Trustee Council and
individual Trustee public Web sites,
and a public comment portal for public
comment collection. The Trustees
prepared the Final PDARP/PEIS in
consideration of the public comments
received and included a summary of the
comments and responses in the Final
PDARP/PEIS.
A Notice of Availability of the Final
PDARP/PEIS was published in the
Federal Register on February 19, 2016
(81 FR 8483). In the Final PDARP/PEIS,
the Deepwater Horizon Trustees
presented their findings on the
extensive injuries to multiple habitats,
biological species, ecological functions,
and geographic regions across the
northern Gulf of Mexico that occurred
as a result of the Deepwater Horizon
incident, as well as their programmatic
plan, including funding allocations, for
restoring those resources and the
services they provide. The Final
PDARP/PEIS describes the framework
by which subsequent project specific
restoration plans will be developed.
As documented in the Record of
Decision (ROD) signed on March 22,
2016, the Trustees have: Determined the
extent of injury to natural resources and
services caused by the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill incident; analyzed
alternatives to restore those injuries;
considered environmental impacts
associated with the restoration
alternatives, including the extent to
which any adverse impacts could be
mitigated; considered public and agency
comments; considered the funding
allocations required for restoration; and
developed a governance approach for
implementing restoration. Based on
these considerations and the
determination of injury, the ROD
presents the Trustees’ decision to select
their Preferred Alternative, Alternative
A: Comprehensive Integrated Ecosystem
Restoration and the associated funding
allocation, for implementation. The
Trustees also conclude that all
practicable means to avoid, minimize,
or compensate for environmental harm
from the action have been considered
programmatically in the PDARP/PEIS,
and that project-specific measures will
be adopted at a later date during
subsequent restoration planning.
The Trustees considered this
programmatic restoration planning
decision in light of the proposed
settlement among BP, the United States,
and the States of Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Florida, and Texas to resolve
BP’s liability for natural resource
damages associated with the Deepwater
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Notices
Horizon incident. Under this proposed
settlement, BP would pay a total of $8.1
billion for restoration to address natural
resource injuries (this includes $1
billion already committed for early
restoration), plus up to an additional
$700 million to respond to natural
resource damages unknown at the time
of the settlement and/or to provide for
adaptive management. The proposed
Consent Decree for the proposed
settlement was the subject of a separate
public notice and comment process; the
Notice of Lodging of the proposed
Consent Decree under the Clean Water
Act and Oil Pollution Act was
published in the Federal Register on
October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60180).
Administrative Record
The documents included in the
Administrative Record for the final
PDARP/PEIS decision can be viewed
electronically at the following location:
https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/
adminrecord.
The Trustees opened a publicly
available Administrative Record for the
Natural Resource Damage Assessment
for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill,
including restoration planning
activities, concurrently with publication
of a 2010 Notice of Intent to Conduct
Restoration Planning (75 FR 60802)
(pursuant to 15 CFR 990.45).
Authorities
The authorities for this action are the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C.
2701 et seq.) and the implementing
Natural Resource Damage Assessment
regulations found at 15 CFR part 990,
and the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Dated: March 23, 2016.
Eileen Sobeck,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–06979 Filed 3–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
RIN 0648–XE234
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Coupeville
Timber Towers Preservation Project
AGENCY:
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
take authorization.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:43 Mar 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUMMARY:
In accordance with
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as
amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to the
Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) to take, by
harassment, small numbers of 10
species of marine mammals incidental
to construction activities for the
Coupeville Timber Tower Preservation
Project in Washington State, between
July 15, 2016, and July 14, 2017.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from July 15, 2016, through July 14,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘. . . an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
a one-year authorization to incidentally
take small numbers of marine mammals
by harassment, provided that there is no
potential for serious injury or mortality
to result from the activity. Section
101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time
limit for NMFS review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17439
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of marine mammals. Within
45 days of the close of the comment
period, NMFS must either issue or deny
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On June 9, 2015 WSDOT submitted a
request to NOAA requesting an IHA for
the possible harassment of small
numbers of marine mammal species
incidental to construction associated
with the Coupeville Timber Towers
Preservation Project at the Coupeville
Ferry Terminal in Washington State,
between July 15, 2016, and July 14,
2017. On September 22, WSDOT
submitted a revised IHA application
which incorporated rigorous monitoring
and mitigation measures that would
prevent the take of humpback whales
and the Southern Resident killer
whales, which are listed under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
revised IHA application requests the
take of small numbers of 10 marine
mammal species incidental to the
Coupeville Timber Towers Preservation
Project. NMFS determined that the IHA
application was complete on October 1,
2015. NMFS proposed to authorize the
Level B harassment of the following
marine mammal species/stocks: harbor
seal, California sea lion, Steller sea lion
(eastern Distinct Population Segment, or
DPS), northern elephant seal, killer
whale (West Coast transient stock), gray
whale, minke whale, harbor porpoise,
Dall’s porpoise, and Pacific white-sided
dolphin.
Description of the Specified Activity
A detailed description of the
WSDOT’s Coupeville Timber Towers
Preservation Project is provided in the
Federal Register notice for the proposed
IHA (81 FR 3378; January 21, 2016).
WSDOT proposes to conduct
Coupeville Timber Towers Preservation
Project at the Washington Coupeville
Ferry Terminal on Whidbey Island,
Washington (Figure 1–2 of the IHA
application), to upgrade the existing
transfer span towers at the Coupeville
Ferry Terminal. These activities include
impact pile driving and vibratory pile
removal.
Eight 24-inch diameter hollow steel
piles would be installed to support the
towers, and concrete caps will be
installed on top of the towers in order
to support the headframe that houses
the pulleys for the transfer span cables.
Five to seven 12-inch timber piles
would be removed to allow room for the
new steel piles to be installed. The
remaining tower timber piles would
remain in place to help support the
structure. Up to 6 temporary 24-inch
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17438-17439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06979]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE201
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Record
of Decision (ROD) for the Final Programmatic Damage Assessment and
Restoration Plan and Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
(Final PDARP/PEIS)
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), notice is hereby given that
the Deepwater Horizon Federal and State natural resource trustee
agencies (Trustees) have issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Final Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS). Based
on the Trustees' injury determination established in the Final PDARP/
PEIS, the ROD sets forth the basis for the Trustees' decision to select
Alternative A: Comprehensive Integrated Ecosystem Alternative. The
Trustees' selection of this alternative includes the funding
allocations established in the Final PDARP/PEIS.
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You may download the ROD at https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov or https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon. You may also view the ROD at any of the public
repositories listed at https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Courtney Groeneveld at
gulfspill.restoration@noaa.gov, mail to:
fw4coastalDERPcomments@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 17, 2011, the Trustees initiated a 90-day formal
scoping and public comment period for the Draft PDARP/PEIS (76 FR 9327)
through a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Begin Restoration Scoping and
Prepare a Gulf Spill Restoration Planning PEIS. The Trustees conducted
the scoping in accordance with OPA (15 CFR 990.14(d)), NEPA (40 CFR
1501.7), and State authorities. That NOI requested public input to
identify and evaluate a range of restoration types that could be used
to fully compensate the public for the environmental and recreational
use damages caused by the spill, as well as develop procedures to
select and implement restoration projects that will compensate the
public for the natural resource damages caused by the spill. As part of
the scoping process, the Trustees hosted public meetings across all the
Gulf States during Spring 2011.
A Notice of Availability of the Draft PDARP/PEIS was published in
the Federal Register on October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60126). The Draft PDARP/
PEIS presented the assessment of impacts of the Deepwater Horizon
incident on natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico and on the services
those resources provide, and determined the restoration needed to
compensate the public for these impacts. The Draft PDARP/PEIS presented
four programmatic alternatives evaluated in accordance with OPA and
NEPA:
Alternative A (Preferred Alternative): Comprehensive
Integrated Ecosystem Restoration Plan based on programmatic Trustee
goals;
Alternative B: Resource-Specific Restoration Plan based on
programmatic Trustee goals;
Alternative C: Continued Injury Assessment and Defer
Comprehensive Restoration Plan; and
Alternative D: No Action/Natural Recovery.
The Trustees provided the public with 60 days to review and comment
on the Draft PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees held public meetings in Houma,
LA; Long Beach, MS; New Orleans, LA; Mobile, AL; Pensacola, FL; St.
Petersburg, FL; Galveston, TX; and Washington, DC, to facilitate public
understanding of the document and provide opportunity for public
comment. Additionally, the Trustees solicited public input through a
variety of mechanisms, including electronic communications, Trustee
Council and individual Trustee public Web sites, and a public comment
portal for public comment collection. The Trustees prepared the Final
PDARP/PEIS in consideration of the public comments received and
included a summary of the comments and responses in the Final PDARP/
PEIS.
A Notice of Availability of the Final PDARP/PEIS was published in
the Federal Register on February 19, 2016 (81 FR 8483). In the Final
PDARP/PEIS, the Deepwater Horizon Trustees presented their findings on
the extensive injuries to multiple habitats, biological species,
ecological functions, and geographic regions across the northern Gulf
of Mexico that occurred as a result of the Deepwater Horizon incident,
as well as their programmatic plan, including funding allocations, for
restoring those resources and the services they provide. The Final
PDARP/PEIS describes the framework by which subsequent project specific
restoration plans will be developed.
As documented in the Record of Decision (ROD) signed on March 22,
2016, the Trustees have: Determined the extent of injury to natural
resources and services caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
incident; analyzed alternatives to restore those injuries; considered
environmental impacts associated with the restoration alternatives,
including the extent to which any adverse impacts could be mitigated;
considered public and agency comments; considered the funding
allocations required for restoration; and developed a governance
approach for implementing restoration. Based on these considerations
and the determination of injury, the ROD presents the Trustees'
decision to select their Preferred Alternative, Alternative A:
Comprehensive Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and the associated
funding allocation, for implementation. The Trustees also conclude that
all practicable means to avoid, minimize, or compensate for
environmental harm from the action have been considered
programmatically in the PDARP/PEIS, and that project-specific measures
will be adopted at a later date during subsequent restoration planning.
The Trustees considered this programmatic restoration planning
decision in light of the proposed settlement among BP, the United
States, and the States of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, and
Texas to resolve BP's liability for natural resource damages associated
with the Deepwater
[[Page 17439]]
Horizon incident. Under this proposed settlement, BP would pay a total
of $8.1 billion for restoration to address natural resource injuries
(this includes $1 billion already committed for early restoration),
plus up to an additional $700 million to respond to natural resource
damages unknown at the time of the settlement and/or to provide for
adaptive management. The proposed Consent Decree for the proposed
settlement was the subject of a separate public notice and comment
process; the Notice of Lodging of the proposed Consent Decree under the
Clean Water Act and Oil Pollution Act was published in the Federal
Register on October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60180).
Administrative Record
The documents included in the Administrative Record for the final
PDARP/PEIS decision can be viewed electronically at the following
location: https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/adminrecord.
The Trustees opened a publicly available Administrative Record for
the Natural Resource Damage Assessment for the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill, including restoration planning activities, concurrently with
publication of a 2010 Notice of Intent to Conduct Restoration Planning
(75 FR 60802) (pursuant to 15 CFR 990.45).
Authorities
The authorities for this action are the Oil Pollution Act of 1990
(33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) and the implementing Natural Resource Damage
Assessment regulations found at 15 CFR part 990, and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Dated: March 23, 2016.
Eileen Sobeck,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-06979 Filed 3-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P