Removal of Outdated and Duplicative Guidance (2016-N010), 17124-17125 [2016-06887]
Download as PDF
17124
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1817 and 1852
RIN 2700–AE28
Removal of Outdated and Duplicative
Guidance (2016–N010)
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) is
proposing to amend the NASA FAR
Supplement (NFS) to remove
duplicative language of the FAR and
superseded NFS guidance. The revision
is part of NASA’s retrospective plan
under Executive Order (EO) 13563
completed in August 2011.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before May
27, 2016 to be considered in formulation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by NFS Case 2016–N010,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘NFS Case 2016–N010’’ under
the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘NFS Case 2016–N010.’’ Follow
the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit
a Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘NFS Case 2016–N010’’ on your
attached document.
Æ Email: manuel.quinones@nasa.gov.
Include NFS Case 2016–N010 in the
subject line of the message.
Æ Fax: (202) 358–3082.
Æ Mail: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Headquarters,
Office of Procurement, Contract and
Grant Policy Division, Attn: Mr. Manuel
Quinones, Suite 5K32, 300 E. Street
SW., Washington, DC 20546–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Manuel Quinones, NASA, Office of
Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy
Division, Suite 5K32, 300 E. Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20456–0001.
Telephone (202) 358–2143; facsimile
202–358–3082; email:
manuel.quinones@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
I. Background
This rule proposes to amend the
NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) by
removing from the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) those portions of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Mar 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
NFS containing information that
consists of internal Agency
administrative procedures and guidance
that does not control the relationship
between NASA and contractors or
prospective contractors. This change is
consistent with the guidance and policy
in FAR Part 1 regarding what comprises
the Federal Acquisition Regulations
System and requires publication for
public comment. NASA conducted a
comprehensive review of the NFS to
validate the accuracy and relevancy of
its policy, guidance, and procedures.
Additionally, to streamline and clarify
its regulation, NASA identified a
number of NFS parts and sections to be
(1) deleted because of its duplication of
the FAR or (2) relocated as internal
Agency operating procedures to a NASA
maintained Web site available on the
internet at https://www.hq.nasa.gov/
office/procurement/regs/nfstoc.htm.
During a recent review of the NFS we
discovered that an extraneous provision
and two inapplicable clauses had been
inadvertently retained in the regulation
and for which their respective
prescriptions had been previously
deleted during one of the NASA FAR
Supplement Rewrite final rules.
Accordingly, this rule proposes to
remove from the CFR the duplicative
provision and superseded clauses, and
relocate internal Agency-specific
guidance and operating procedures.
The NFS document found on the
NASA Procurement Library Web site
will continue to contain both
information requiring codification in the
CFR and internal Agency guidance and
procedures in a single document.
II. Discussion
NASA’s proposed changes to the CFR
are as follows:
• Remove section 1817.200, as this
statement is redundant.
• Remove section 1817.204, as this
section pertains to internal Agency
guidance and operating procedures.
• Remove section 1852.210–70,
which is duplicative of FAR
requirements and for which no
prescriptive language exists.
• Remove sections 1852.212–70 and
1852.212–74, which are superseded and
for which no prescriptive language
exists.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., because this rule proposes to
remove from the CFR only information
that is either considered internal
Agency administrative procedures or
extraneous provisions/clauses that were
invalidated by previous final rules.
Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has not been
performed. NASA invites comments
from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected
impact of this proposed rule on small
entities.
NASA will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (NFS case 2016–N010) in
their correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1817
and 1852
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA FAR Supplement Manager.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1817 and
1852 are amended as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for parts
1817 and 1852 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(a) and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 1817—SPECIAL CONTRACTING
METHODS
1817.200 and 1817.204
[Removed]
2. Remove sections 1817.200 and
1817.204.
■
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
PART 1852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1852.210–70, 1852.212–70, and 1852.212–74
[Removed]
3. Remove sections 1852.210–70,
1852.212–70, and 1852.212–74.
■
[FR Doc. 2016–06887 Filed 3–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
49 CFR Part 1039
[Docket No. EP 704 (Sub-No. 1)]
Review of Commodity, Boxcar, and
Trailer-on-Flatcar/Container-on-Flatcar
(TOFC/COFC) Exemptions
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board (Board or STB) seeks public
comment on its proposal to revoke the
existing class exemptions for crushed or
broken stone or rip rap; hydraulic
cement; and coke produced from coal,
primary iron or steel products, and iron
or steel scrap, wastes or tailings. The
Board also invites interested parties to
file, during the comment period for
these proposed rules, comments
regarding the possible revocation of
other commodity class exemptions.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
rulemaking are due on or before May 27,
2016; replies are due June 27, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Any filings submitted in
this proceeding must be submitted
either via the Board’s e-filing format or
in the traditional paper format. Any
person using e-filing should attach a
document and otherwise comply with
the instructions found at the E–FILING
link on the Board’s Web site at
www.stb.dot.gov. Any person submitting
a filing in the traditional paper format
should send an original and 10 copies
and also an electronic version to:
Surface Transportation Board, Attn:
Docket No. EP 704 (Sub-No. 1), 395 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Zimmerman at (202) 245–0386.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Services (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Introduction
In 1976, as part of the Railroad
Revitalization and Regulatory Reform
Act of 1976, Public Law 94–210, 90 Stat.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Mar 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
31, Congress gave the Board broad
authority to exempt rail carriers from
regulation when such regulation was
not needed to protect against abuses of
market power. The Interstate Commerce
Commission (ICC or Commission) first
exercised its exemption authority in
Rail General Exemption Authority—
Fresh Fruits & Vegetables, 361 I.C.C. 211
(1979), categorically exempting the
transportation of certain fresh fruits and
vegetables from its regulations.
Congress revised the statutory
exemption standard in the Staggers Rail
Act of 1980, 94 Stat. 1895, to provide
that the agency shall exempt a person,
class of persons, or a transaction or
service when it finds that the
application of a provision of 49 U.S.C.
subtitle IV (1) is not necessary to carry
out the transportation policy of section
10101a; and (2) either (a) the transaction
or service is of limited scope, or (b) the
application of the statute is not
necessary to protect shippers from the
abuse of market power. The exemption
provision, which is now codified at 49
U.S.C. 10502,1 also provides that the
agency may revoke an exemption
(partially or completely) if the agency
later determines that the application of
the Interstate Commerce Act is
necessary to carry out the Rail
Transportation Policy at 49 U.S.C.
10101 (the RTP). See section 10502(d).
Pursuant to its exemption authority,
the ICC, and later the Board, exempted
from regulation the transportation by
rail of numerous other individual
commodities, finding that traffic for
these individual commodities was
sufficiently competitive and that
railroads lacked the ability to subject
shippers to an abuse of market power.2
These commodity exemptions are
codified at 49 CFR 1039.10 and 1039.11.
The Commission also exempted rail
(and truck) operations provided in
connection with trailer-on-flatcar/
container-on-flatcar (TOFC/COFC)
services, at 49 CFR pt. 1090,3 and the
1 There have been additional changes to the
exemption provision since the Staggers Act with
regard to the process and timing of exemption
proceedings. The substantive standard, however,
has remained the same.
2 See Rail Gen. Exemption Auth.—Nonferrous
Recyclables, 3 S.T.B. 62 (1998); Rail Gen.
Exemption Auth.—Pet. of AAR to Exempt Rail
Transp. of Selected Commodity Groups, 9 I.C.C.2d
969 (1993); Exemption from Regulation—Rail
Transp. Frozen Food, 367 I.C.C. 859 (1983); Liquid
Iron Chloride, 367 I.C.C. 347 (1983); Rail Gen.
Exemption Auth.—Miscellaneous Agric.
Commodities, 367 I.C.C. 298 (1983).
3 See Improvement of TOFC/COFC Regulation,
364 I.C.C. 731 (1981); Improvement of TOFC/COFC
Regulations (R.R.-Affiliated Motor Carriers & Other
Motor Carriers), 3 I.C.C.2d 869 (1987); Improvement
of TOFC/COFC Regulations (Pickup & Delivery), 6
I.C.C.2d 208 (1989).
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17125
rail transportation of all commodities in
single-line boxcar service, at 49 CFR
1039.14.4
February 2011 Hearing
The agency’s exemption decisions
were instrumental in the U.S. rail
system’s transition from a heavily
regulated, financially weak component
of the economy into a mature, healthy
industry that operates with limited
oversight. However, more than 30 years
have passed since many of the
commodity exemptions were adopted,
and there have been many changes in
the railroad industry over that period. In
more recent years, the Board received
informal inquiries questioning the
relevance or necessity of some of the
existing commodity exemptions. The
Board, therefore, requested public
comment and held a public hearing in
February 2011 to explore the continued
utility of, and the issues surrounding,
the various commodity exemptions
under 49 CFR 1039.10 and 1039.11, the
boxcar exemption under 49 CFR
1039.14, and the TOFC/COFC
exemption under 49 CFR pt. 1090. The
Board encouraged interested parties to
address the effectiveness of the
exemptions in the marketplace, whether
the rationale behind any of these
exemptions should be revisited, and
whether the exemptions should be
subject to periodic review.
The Board received written comment
from numerous parties representing a
diverse group of stakeholders including
railroads, shippers, and the U.S.
Department of Transportation. Twentyone individuals testified at the hearing.
The Board has considered those written
comments and the oral testimony in
developing the proposal discussed
below.
Proposed Rule
As discussed above, pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 10502(d), the Board may revoke
an exemption, in whole or in part, when
it finds that regulation is necessary to
carry out the RTP. After considering the
oral testimony and written comments,
waybill rate data for years 1992 through
2013,5 and other industry information,
the Board now proposes to revoke the
commodity exemptions for the
following Standard Transportation
Commodity Code (STCC) groups: STCC
4 See Exemption from Regulation—Boxcar Traffic,
367 I.C.C. 425 (1983); Exemption from Regulation—
Boxcar Traffic, 367 I.C.C. 747 (1983), Exemption
from Regulation—Boxcar Traffic, 3 I.C.C.2d 23
(1986). See also Brae Corp. v. United States, 740
F.2d 1023 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
5 The Board reviewed a 22-year period of
confidential waybill data, beginning with
information filed in 1992 and ending with data filed
in 2013, the most recent on file with the Board.
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17124-17125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06887]
[[Page 17124]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1817 and 1852
RIN 2700-AE28
Removal of Outdated and Duplicative Guidance (2016-N010)
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is
proposing to amend the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) to remove duplicative
language of the FAR and superseded NFS guidance. The revision is part
of NASA's retrospective plan under Executive Order (EO) 13563 completed
in August 2011.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before May 27, 2016 to be considered in
formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by NFS Case 2016-N010, using any
of the following methods:
[cir] Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``NFS Case 2016-N010''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``NFS Case
2016-N010.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``NFS Case 2016-N010'' on your attached document.
[cir] Email: manuel.quinones@nasa.gov. Include NFS Case 2016-N010
in the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: (202) 358-3082.
[cir] Mail: National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Headquarters, Office of Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy
Division, Attn: Mr. Manuel Quinones, Suite 5K32, 300 E. Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20546-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Manuel Quinones, NASA, Office of
Procurement, Contract and Grant Policy Division, Suite 5K32, 300 E.
Street SW., Washington, DC 20456-0001.
Telephone (202) 358-2143; facsimile 202-358-3082; email:
manuel.quinones@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This rule proposes to amend the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) by
removing from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) those portions of
the NFS containing information that consists of internal Agency
administrative procedures and guidance that does not control the
relationship between NASA and contractors or prospective contractors.
This change is consistent with the guidance and policy in FAR Part 1
regarding what comprises the Federal Acquisition Regulations System and
requires publication for public comment. NASA conducted a comprehensive
review of the NFS to validate the accuracy and relevancy of its policy,
guidance, and procedures. Additionally, to streamline and clarify its
regulation, NASA identified a number of NFS parts and sections to be
(1) deleted because of its duplication of the FAR or (2) relocated as
internal Agency operating procedures to a NASA maintained Web site
available on the internet at https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/regs/nfstoc.htm. During a recent review of the NFS we discovered that
an extraneous provision and two inapplicable clauses had been
inadvertently retained in the regulation and for which their respective
prescriptions had been previously deleted during one of the NASA FAR
Supplement Rewrite final rules. Accordingly, this rule proposes to
remove from the CFR the duplicative provision and superseded clauses,
and relocate internal Agency-specific guidance and operating
procedures.
The NFS document found on the NASA Procurement Library Web site
will continue to contain both information requiring codification in the
CFR and internal Agency guidance and procedures in a single document.
II. Discussion
NASA's proposed changes to the CFR are as follows:
Remove section 1817.200, as this statement is redundant.
Remove section 1817.204, as this section pertains to
internal Agency guidance and operating procedures.
Remove section 1852.210-70, which is duplicative of FAR
requirements and for which no prescriptive language exists.
Remove sections 1852.212-70 and 1852.212-74, which are
superseded and for which no prescriptive language exists.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health, and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
NASA does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
because this rule proposes to remove from the CFR only information that
is either considered internal Agency administrative procedures or
extraneous provisions/clauses that were invalidated by previous final
rules. Therefore, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has not
been performed. NASA invites comments from small business concerns and
other interested parties on the expected impact of this proposed rule
on small entities.
NASA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (NFS case 2016-N010) in their
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1817 and 1852
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
NASA FAR Supplement Manager.
Accordingly, 48 CFR parts 1817 and 1852 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for parts 1817 and 1852 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 20113(a) and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 1817--SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
1817.200 and 1817.204 [Removed]
0
2. Remove sections 1817.200 and 1817.204.
[[Page 17125]]
PART 1852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
1852.210-70, 1852.212-70, and 1852.212-74 [Removed]
0
3. Remove sections 1852.210-70, 1852.212-70, and 1852.212-74.
[FR Doc. 2016-06887 Filed 3-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P