Proposed Collection; 60-Day Comment Request; U.S. Nuclear Medicine Technologists Study (NCI), 17192-17193 [2016-06867]
Download as PDF
17192
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2016 / Notices
Place: National Institutes of Health, Room
5F100, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD
20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Andrea L. Wurster, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer Scientific Review
Program, Division of Extramural Activities,
Room 3G33B National Institutes of Health,
NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9823,
Bethesda, MD 20899823, (240) 669–5062,
wurstera@mail.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology,
and Transplantation Research; 93.856,
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: March 22, 2016.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–06871 Filed 3–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Aging Special Emphasis Panel: 2016 Beeson
Review
Date: May 26, 2016
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications
Place: DoubleTree by Hilton, 8120
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian,
Ph.D., Scientific Review Office, National
Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212,
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD
20892, 301–496–9666, PARSADANIANA@
NIA.NIH.GOV.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research,
National Institutes of Health, HHS).
Dated: March 22, 2016.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–06870 Filed 3–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institute on Aging; Notice of
Closed Meetings
National Institutes of Health
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Aging Special Emphasis Panel: Vascular
Dysfunction in AD and Genetic Risk Factors.
Date: May 6, 2016.
Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institute on Aging,
Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, 7201
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian,
Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National
Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212,
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD
20892, 301–496–9666, PARSADANIANA@
NIA.NIH.GOV.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Mar 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
Proposed Collection; 60-Day Comment
Request; U.S. Nuclear Medicine
Technologists Study (NCI)
In compliance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
National Cancer Institute, the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) will publish
periodic summaries of proposed
projects to be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval.
Written comments and/or suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
are invited to address one or more of the
following points: Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
function of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; The accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
The quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To Submit Comments and For Further
Information: To obtain a copy of the
data collection plans and instruments,
submit comments in writing, or request
more information on the proposed
project, contact*: Michele M. Doody,
Radiation Epidemiology Branch,
National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical
Center Drive, Room 7E566, Rockville,
MD 20850, or call non-toll-free at 301–
414–0308. Or Email your request,
including your address to: doodym@
mail.nih.gov. Formal requests for
additional plans and instruments must
be requested in writing.
Comment Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 60 days of the date of
this publication.
Proposed Collection: US Nuclear
Medicine Technologists Study, 0925–
0656, Expiration Date 04/30/2015—
REINSTATEMENT WITH CHANGE,
National Cancer Institute (NCI),
National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Need and Use of Information
Collection: We propose to collect, from
U.S. nuclear medicine technologists
(USNMT) certified after 1980, historical
information about nuclear medicine
procedures performed, radioisotopes
used, related work and safety practices,
and places of employment. The primary
objectives of the current feasibility effort
are: (a) To identify a cohort of nuclear
medicine technologists certified after
1980 by the American Registry of
Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) and/or
the Nuclear Medicine Technologist
Certification Board (NMTCB); and (b) to
characterize individual organ-specific
occupational radiation doses from
radioisotope procedures. More recently
certified technologists, who specialized
in nuclear medicine, are expected to
have greater exposures to radioisotopes
than the general radiologic technologists
in the U.S. Radiologic Technologist
(USRT) cohort owing to performing
such procedures with greater frequency.
The proposed USNMT study would be
a direct follow-on to the USRT Study to
assess health risks associated with
occupational exposure to these much
higher-energy radiopharmaceuticals.
OMB approval is requested for 3
years. There are no costs to respondents
other than their time. The total
estimated annualized burden hours are
125.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
17193
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Average time
per response
(hours)
Frequency of
response
Annual hour
burden
Type of respondent
Instrument
Nuclear Medicine Technologists .......
Nuclear Medicine Questionnaire ......
Consent ............................................
250
250
1
1
20/60
10/60
83
42
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
250
250
........................
125
Dated: March 21, 2016.
Karla Bailey,
Project Clearance Liaison, National Cancer
Institute, NIH.
consumption at the rate of 6.0 percent
ad valorem under subheading
1604.14.22, Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) during the
Calendar Year 2016. Any such tuna
which is entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption during the
current calendar year in excess of this
quota will be dutiable at the rate of 12.5
percent ad valorem under subheading
1604.14.30 HTSUS.
[FR Doc. 2016–06867 Filed 3–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[CBP Dec. 16–07]
Tuna-Tariff Rate Quota; the Tariff-Rate
Quota for Calendar Year 2016 Tuna
Classifiable Under Subheading
1604.14.22, Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
Each year, the tariff-rate quota
for tuna described in subheading
1604.14.22, Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS), is
calculated as a percentage of the tuna in
airtight containers entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the preceding
Calendar Year. This document sets forth
the tariff-rate quota for Calendar Year
2016.
DATES: Effective Dates: The 2016 tariffrate quota is applicable to tuna in
airtight containers entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period January
1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Headquarters Quota Branch, Interagency
Collaboration Division, Trade Policy
and Programs, Office of International
Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Washington, DC 20229–
1155, (202) 863–6560.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
It has been determined that
15,350,636 kilograms of tuna in airtight
containers may be entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
Jkt 238001
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. DHS–2015–0068]
SUMMARY:
14:52 Mar 25, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016–06944 Filed 3–25–16; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Announcement of the quota
quantity of tuna in airtight containers
for Calendar Year 2016.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: March 23, 2016.
Brenda B. Smith,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
National Protection and Programs
Directorate; National Protection and
Programs Directorate Seeks
Comments on Cyber Incident Data
Repository White Papers
National Protection and
Programs Directorate, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security’s (DHS’s) National Protection
and Programs Directorate (NPPD)
announces that it is seeking comments
on three white papers prepared by
NPPD staff from any interested party,
including, but not limited to: members
of the cybersecurity and insurance
communities; chief information security
officers (CISOs); chief security officers
(CSOs); academia; Federal, State, and
local governments; industry; and
professional organizations/societies.
Links to the white papers are posted on
the cybersecurity insurance section of
DHS.gov: https://www.dhs.gov/
publication/cyber-incident-data-andanalysis-working-group-white-papers.
Comments will assist NPPD further
refine the content of the white papers to
address the critical need for information
sharing as a means to create a more
robust cybersecurity insurance
marketplace and improve enterprise
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
cyber hygiene practices across the
public and private sectors.
DATES: The suggested dates for
submission of comments on the white
papers are: March 24, 2016 through May
24, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the white
papers must be submitted to NPPD via
email to the following address:
cyber.security.insurance@hq.dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Shabat, Director, Performance
Management, Office of Cybersecurity
and Communications at 703–235–5338
or by email at Matthew.Shabat@
hq.dhs.gov.
Sfmt 4703
Background: Cybersecurity insurance
is designed to mitigate losses from a
variety of cyber incidents, including
data breaches, business interruption,
and network damage. A robust
cybersecurity insurance market could
help reduce the number of successful
cyber attacks by: (1) Promoting the
adoption of preventative measures in
return for more coverage; and (2)
encouraging the implementation of best
practices by basing premiums on an
insured’s level of self-protection. Many
companies forego available policies;
however, citing as rationales the
perceived high cost of those policies,
confusion about what they cover, and
uncertainty that their organizations will
suffer a cyber attack. In recent years,
NPPD has engaged key stakeholders to
address this emerging cyber risk area.
Between October 2012 and April
2014, DHS NPPD conducted several
workshops, which brought together a
diverse group of private and public
sector stakeholders—including insurers,
risk managers, CISOs, critical
infrastructure owners, and social
scientists. Workshop participants
examined the current state of the
cybersecurity insurance market and how
to best advance its capacity to
incentivize better cyber risk
management.
During those workshops, participants
expressed strong support for the
creation of a trusted cyber incident data
repository. As envisioned, the
repository would store, aggregate, and
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17192-17193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06867]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Proposed Collection; 60-Day Comment Request; U.S. Nuclear
Medicine Technologists Study (NCI)
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment
on proposed data collection projects, the National Cancer Institute,
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will publish periodic summaries
of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
Written comments and/or suggestions from the public and affected
agencies are invited to address one or more of the following points:
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the function of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; The accuracy of the agency's
estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; The
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
To Submit Comments and For Further Information: To obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and instruments, submit comments in writing,
or request more information on the proposed project, contact*: Michele
M. Doody, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7E566, Rockville, MD 20850, or call
non-toll-free at 301-414-0308. Or Email your request, including your
address to: doodym@mail.nih.gov. Formal requests for additional plans
and instruments must be requested in writing.
Comment Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days
of the date of this publication.
Proposed Collection: US Nuclear Medicine Technologists Study, 0925-
0656, Expiration Date 04/30/2015--REINSTATEMENT WITH CHANGE, National
Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Need and Use of Information Collection: We propose to collect, from
U.S. nuclear medicine technologists (USNMT) certified after 1980,
historical information about nuclear medicine procedures performed,
radioisotopes used, related work and safety practices, and places of
employment. The primary objectives of the current feasibility effort
are: (a) To identify a cohort of nuclear medicine technologists
certified after 1980 by the American Registry of Radiologic
Technologists (ARRT) and/or the Nuclear Medicine Technologist
Certification Board (NMTCB); and (b) to characterize individual organ-
specific occupational radiation doses from radioisotope procedures.
More recently certified technologists, who specialized in nuclear
medicine, are expected to have greater exposures to radioisotopes than
the general radiologic technologists in the U.S. Radiologic
Technologist (USRT) cohort owing to performing such procedures with
greater frequency. The proposed USNMT study would be a direct follow-on
to the USRT Study to assess health risks associated with occupational
exposure to these much higher-energy radiopharmaceuticals.
OMB approval is requested for 3 years. There are no costs to
respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized
burden hours are 125.
[[Page 17193]]
Table 1--Estimates of Annual Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average time
Type of respondent Instrument Number of Frequency of per response Annual hour
respondents response (hours) burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Medicine Technologists Nuclear Medicine 250 1 20/60 83
Questionnaire.
Consent......... 250 1 10/60 42
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Total..................... ................ 250 250 .............. 125
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: March 21, 2016.
Karla Bailey,
Project Clearance Liaison, National Cancer Institute, NIH.
[FR Doc. 2016-06867 Filed 3-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P