Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Butyryl Fentanyl and Beta-Hydroxythiofentanyl Into Schedule I, 15485-15489 [2016-06468]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
this NOPR under section 380.4(a)(15) of
the Commission’s regulations, which
provides a categorical exemption for
approval of actions under sections 205
and 206 of the FPA relating to the filing
of schedules containing all rates and
charges for the transmission or sale of
electric energy subject to the
Commission’s jurisdiction, plus the
classification, practices, contracts and
regulations that affect rates, charges,
classifications, and services.33 The
revisions proposed in this NOPR would
update and clarify the application of the
Commission’s standard interconnection
requirements to small generating
facilities. Therefore, this NOPR falls
within the categorical exemptions
provided in the Commission’s
regulations, and as a result neither an
environmental impact statement nor an
environmental assessment is required.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
26. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980 (RFA) 34 generally requires a
description and analysis of proposed
rules that will have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The RFA does
not mandate any particular outcome in
a rulemaking. It only requires
consideration of alternatives that are
less burdensome to small entities and an
agency explanation of why alternatives
were rejected.
27. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) revised its size
standards (effective January 22, 2014)
for electric utilities from a standard
based on megawatt hours to a standard
based on the number of employees,
including affiliates. Under SBA’s
standards, some transmission owners
will fall under the following category
and associated size threshold: Electric
bulk power transmission and control, at
500 employees.35
28. The Commission estimates that
the total number of public utility
transmission providers that would have
to modify the SGIAs within their
currently effective OATTs is 118. Of
these, the Commission estimates that
approximately 43 percent are small
entities. The Commission estimates the
average total cost to each of these
entities will be minimal, requiring on
average 7.5 hours or $540. According to
SBA guidance, the determination of
significance of impact ‘‘should be seen
as relative to the size of the business,
the size of the competitor’s business,
33 18
CFR 380.4(a)(15).
U.S.C. 601–612.
35 13 CFR 121.201, Sector 22 (Utilities), NAICS
code 221121 (Electric Bulk Power Transmission and
Control).
34 5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
and the impact the regulation has on
larger competitors.’’ 36 The Commission
does not consider the estimated burden
to be a significant economic impact. As
a result, the Commission certifies that
the reforms proposed in this NOPR
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
VI. Comment Procedures
29. The Commission invites interested
persons to submit comments on the
matters and issues proposed in this
notice to be adopted, including any
related matters or alternative proposals
that commenters may wish to discuss.
Comments are due May 23, 2016.
Comments must refer to Docket No.
RM16–8–000, and must include the
commenter’s name, the organization
they represent, if applicable, and their
address in their comments.
30. The Commission encourages
comments to be filed electronically via
the eFiling link on the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.ferc.gov. The
Commission accepts most standard
word processing formats. Documents
created electronically using word
processing software should be filed in
native applications or print-to-PDF
format and not in a scanned format.
Commenters filing electronically do not
need to make a paper filing.
31. Commenters that are not able to
file comments electronically must send
an original of their comments to:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
32. All comments will be placed in
the Commission’s public files and may
be viewed, printed, or downloaded
remotely as described in the Document
Availability section below. Commenters
on this proposal are not required to
serve copies of their comments on other
commenters.
VII. Document Availability
33. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the Internet through the
Commission’s Home Page (https://
www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s
Public Reference Room during normal
business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
36 U.S. Small Business Administration, A Guide
for Government Agencies How to Comply with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, at 18 (May 2012), https://
www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/advocacy/rfaguide_
0512_0.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15485
34. From the Commission’s Home
Page on the Internet, this information is
available on eLibrary. The full text of
this document is available on eLibrary
in PDF and Microsoft Word format for
viewing, printing, and/or downloading.
To access this document in eLibrary,
type the docket number excluding the
last three digits of this document in the
docket number field.
35. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the Commission’s Web site
during normal business hours from the
Commission’s Online Support at (202)
502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676)
or email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov,
or the Public Reference Room at (202)
502–8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email
the Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
By direction of the Commission.
Issued: March 17, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–06509 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–434]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Butyryl
Fentanyl and Beta-Hydroxythiofentanyl
Into Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration is issuing
this notice of intent to temporarily
schedule the synthetic opioids, N-(1phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-Nphenylbutyramide (butyryl fentanyl)
and N-[1-[2-hydroxy-2-(thiophen-2yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-Nphenylpropionamide (betahydroxythiofentanyl), into schedule I
pursuant to the temporary scheduling
provisions of the Controlled Substances
Act. This action is based on a finding by
the Administrator that the placement of
these synthetic opioids into schedule I
of the Controlled Substances Act is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety. Any final order will
impose the administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions and regulatory
controls applicable to schedule I
controlled substances under the
Controlled Substances Act on the
manufacture, distribution, possession,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
15486
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
temporary scheduling for up to one
year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect for the
substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). The Attorney General has
delegated scheduling authority under 21
U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of the
DEA. 28 CFR 0.100.
Legal Authority
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
importation, and exportation of, and
research and conduct with, instructional
activities of these synthetic opioids.
DATES: March 23, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara J. Boockholdt, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any final
order will be published in the Federal
Register and may not be effective prior
to April 22, 2016.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of his intention to
temporarily place a substance into
schedule I of the CSA.1 The
Administrator transmitted notice of his
intent to place butyryl fentanyl and
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in schedule I
on a temporary basis to the Assistant
Secretary by letter dated December 21,
2015 (received by the HHS on December
23, 2015). The Assistant Secretary
responded to this notice by letter dated
January 13, 2016, and advised that
based on review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are
currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug
applications for butryl fentanyl or betahydroxythiofentanyl. The Assistant
Secretary also stated that the HHS has
no objection to the temporary placement
of butryl fentanyl or betahydroxythiofentanyl into schedule I of
the CSA. Neither butryl fentanyl nor
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl are currently
listed in any schedule under the CSA,
and no exemptions or approvals are in
effect for butryl fentanyl or betahydroxythiofentanyl under section 505
of the FDCA, 21 U.S.C. 355. The DEA
has found that the control of butryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl
in schedule I on a temporary basis are
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to public safety.
To find that placing a substance
temporarily into schedule I of the CSA
is necessary to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety, the
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) implements and
enforces titles II and III of the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970, as amended. 21
U.S.C. 801–971. Titles II and III are
referred to as the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Act’’ and the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act,’’
respectively, and are collectively
referred to as the ‘‘Controlled
Substances Act’’ or the ‘‘CSA’’ for the
purpose of this action. The DEA
publishes the implementing regulations
for these statutes in title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter II.
The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent,
detect, and eliminate the diversion of
controlled substances and listed
chemicals into the illicit market while
providing for the legitimate medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse
and dependence and are controlled to
protect the public health and safety.
Under the CSA, each controlled
substance is classified into one of five
schedules based upon its potential for
abuse, its currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and the degree of dependence the drug
or other substance may cause. 21 U.S.C.
812. The initial schedules of controlled
substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c), and the
current list of all scheduled substances
is published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811,
provides the Attorney General with the
authority to temporarily place a
substance into schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if she
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may extend the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
1 As discussed in a memorandum of
understanding entered into by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency
within the HHS in carrying out the Secretary’s
scheduling responsibilities under the CSA, with the
concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1985.
The Secretary of the HHS has delegated to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS the
authority to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Administrator is required to consider
three of the eight factors set forth in
section 201(c) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(c): The substance’s history and
current pattern of abuse; the scope,
duration and significance of abuse; and
what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate
channels, and clandestine importation,
manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
may only be placed in schedule I. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1). Substances in schedule
I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(1).
Butyryl Fentanyl and BetaHydroxythiofentanyl
Available data and information for
butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl, summarized
below, indicate that these synthetic
opioid substances have a high potential
for abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. The DEA’s
three-factor analysis is available in its
entirety under of the public docket of
this action as a supporting document at
www.regulations.gov under Docket
Number DEA–434.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of
Abuse
Clandestinely produced substances
structurally related to the schedule II
opioid analgesic fentanyl were
trafficked and abused on the West Coast
in the late 1970s and 1980s. These
clandestinely produced fentanyl-like
substances were commonly known as
designer drugs, and recently there has
been a reemergence in the trafficking
and abuse of designer drug substances,
including fentanyl-like substances.
Alpha-methylfentanyl, the first fentanyl
analogue identified in California, was
placed into schedule I of the CSA in
September 1981. 46 FR 46799.
Following the control of alphamethylfentanyl, the DEA identified
several other fentanyl analogues (3methylthiofentanyl, acetyl-alphamethylfentanyl, beta-hydroxy-3methylfentanyl, alphamethylthiofentanyl, thiofentanyl, betahydroxyfentanyl, para-fluorofentanyl,
and 3-methylfentanyl) in submissions to
forensic laboratories. These substances
were temporarily controlled under
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
schedule I of the CSA after finding that
they posed an imminent hazard to
public safety and were subsequently
permanently placed in schedule I of the
CSA. On July 17, 2015, acetyl fentanyl
was temporarily controlled under
schedule I of the CSA after a finding by
the Administrator that it posed an
imminent hazard to public safety. 80 FR
42381.
Prior to October 1, 2014, the System
to Retrieve Information from Drug
Evidence (STRIDE) collected the results
of drug evidence analyzed at DEA
laboratories and reflected evidence
submitted by the DEA, other federal law
enforcement agencies, and some local
law enforcement agencies. STRIDE data
were queried through September 30,
2014, by date submitted to federal
forensic laboratories. Since October 1,
2014, STARLiMS (a web-based,
commercial laboratory information
management system) has replaced
STRIDE as the DEA laboratory drug
evidence data system of record. DEA
laboratory data submitted after
September 30, 2014, are reposited in
STARLiMS. Data from STRIDE and
STARLiMS were queried on December
21, 2015. The National Forensic
Laboratory Information System (NFLIS)
is a program of the DEA that collects
drug identification results from drug
cases analyzed by other federal, state,
and local forensic laboratories. NFLIS
reports from other federal, state, and
local forensic laboratories were queried
on December 22, 2015.2
The first laboratory submission of
butyryl fentanyl was recorded in Kansas
in March 2014 according to NFLIS.
STRIDE, STARLiMS and NFLIS
registered seven reports containing
butyryl fentanyl in 2014 in Illinois,
Kansas, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania;
81 reports of butyryl fentanyl were
recorded in 2015 in California,
Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, North
Dakota, New York, Ohio, Oregon,
Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin. A
total of three reports of betahydroxythiofentanyl were recorded by
STARLiMS, all of which were reported
in 2015 from Florida. To date, betahydroxythiofentanyl has not been
reported in NFLIS; however, this
substance was identified in June 2015
by a forensic laboratory in Oregon.
Evidence also suggests that the
pattern of abuse of fentanyl analogues,
including butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl, parallels that of
heroin and prescription opioid
analgesics. Seizures of butyryl fentanyl
2 Data are still being reported for September–
November 2015, due to normal lag time for
laboratories to report to NFLIS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
have been encountered in tablet and
powder form. Butyryl fentanyl was
identified on bottle caps and spoons and
residue was detected within glassine
bags, on digital scales, and on sifters
which demonstrates the abuse of this
substance as a replacement for heroin or
other opioids, either knowingly or
unknowingly. Butyryl fentanyl has been
encountered as a single substance as
well as in combination with other illicit
substances, such as acetyl fentanyl,
heroin, cocaine, or methamphetamine.
Like butyryl fentanyl, betahydroxythiofentanyl has been
encountered in both tablet and powder
form. Both butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl have caused fatal
overdoses, in which intravenous routes
of administration are documented.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and
Significance of Abuse
The DEA is currently aware of at least
40 confirmed fatalities associated with
butyryl fentanyl and 7 confirmed
fatalities associated with betahydroxythiofentanyl. The information
on these deaths occurring in 2015 was
collected from toxicology and medical
examiner reports and was reported from
four states—Florida (7, betahydroxythiofentanyl), Maryland (1,
butyryl fentanyl), New York (38, butyryl
fentanyl), and Oregon (1, butyryl
fentanyl). STRIDE, STARLiMS, and
NFLIS have a total of 88 drug reports in
which butyryl fentanyl was identified in
drug exhibits submitted in 2014 and
2015 from California, Connecticut,
Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas,
Minnesota, North Dakota, New York,
Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee,
Virginia, and Wisconsin. STARLiMS
has a total of three drug reports in
which beta-hydroxythiofentanyl was
identified in drug exhibits submitted in
2015 from Florida. It is likely that the
prevalence of butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl in opioid
analgesic-related emergency room
admissions and deaths is underreported
as standard immunoassays cannot
differentiate these substances from
fentanyl.
The population likely to abuse butyryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl
overlaps with the populations abusing
prescription opioid analgesics and
heroin. This is evidenced by the routes
of administration and drug use history
documented in butyryl fentanyl and
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl fatal overdose
cases. Because abusers of these fentanyl
analogues are likely to obtain these
substances through illicit sources, the
identity, purity, and quantity is
uncertain and inconsistent, thus posing
significant adverse health risks to
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15487
abusers of butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl. Individuals who
initiate (i.e. use an illicit drug for the
first time) butyryl fentanyl or betahydroxythiofentanyl abuse are likely to
be at risk of developing substance use
disorder, overdose, and death similar to
that of other opioid analgesics (e.g.,
fentanyl, morphine, etc.).
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to
the Public Health
Butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl exhibit
pharmacological profiles similar to that
of fentanyl and other mu-opioid
receptor agonists. Due to limited
scientific data, their potency and
toxicity are not known; however, the
toxic effects of both butyryl fentanyl and
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in humans are
demonstrated by overdose fatalities
involving these substances. Abusers of
these fentanyl analogues may not know
the origin, identity, or purity of these
substances, thus posing significant
adverse health risks when compared to
abuse of pharmaceutical preparations of
opioid analgesics, such as morphine and
oxycodone.
Based on the documented case reports
of overdose fatalities, the abuse of
butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl leads to the same
qualitative public health risks as heroin,
fentanyl and other opioid analgesic
substances. The public health risks
attendant to the abuse of heroin and
opioid analgesics are well established
and have resulted in large numbers of
drug treatment admissions, emergency
department visits, and fatal overdoses.
Butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl have been
associated with numerous fatalities. At
least 40 confirmed overdose deaths
involving butyryl fentanyl abuse have
been reported in Maryland (1), New
York (38), and Oregon (1) in 2015. At
least seven confirmed overdose fatalities
involving beta-hydroxythiofentanyl
have been reported in Florida in 2015.
This indicates that both butyryl fentanyl
and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl pose an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I
Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information, summarized above, the
continued uncontrolled manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution,
importation, exportation, conduct of
research and chemical analysis,
possession, and abuse of butyryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl
pose an imminent hazard to the public
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
15488
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
safety. The DEA is not aware of any
currently accepted medical uses for
these substances in the United States. A
substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling,
21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), may only be placed
in schedule I. Substances in schedule I
are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. Available
data and information for butyryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl
indicate that these substances have a
high potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical
supervision. As required by section
201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(4), the Administrator, through a
letter dated December 21, 2015, notified
the Assistant Secretary of the DEA’s
intention to temporarily place this
substance in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates an
expedited temporary scheduling action
and provides the 30-day notice pursuant
to section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h). In accordance with the
provisions of section 201(h) of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator
considered available data and
information, herein set forth the
grounds for his determination that it is
necessary to temporarily schedule
butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl in schedule I of the
CSA, and finds that placement of these
opioid substances into schedule I of the
CSA is necessary in order to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
Because the Administrator hereby
finds that it is necessary to temporarily
place these synthetic opioids into
schedule I to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety, any subsequent
final order temporarily scheduling these
substances will be effective on the date
of publication in the Federal Register,
and will be in effect for a period of two
years, with a possible extension of one
additional year, pending completion of
the regular (permanent) scheduling
process. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (2). It
is the intention of the Administrator to
issue such a final order as soon as
possible after the expiration of 30 days
from the date of publication of this
notice. Butyryl fentanyl and betahydroxythiofentanyl will then be
subject to the regulatory controls and
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to the manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution,
importation, exportation, research,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
conduct of instructional activities and
chemical analysis, and possession of a
schedule I controlled substance.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
Regular scheduling actions in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures
done ‘‘on the record after opportunity
for a hearing’’ conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.
21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling
process of formal rulemaking affords
interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any
additional relevant information needed
to make a determination. Final
decisions that conclude the regular
scheduling process of formal
rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary
scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h), provides for an expedited
temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
As provided in this subsection, the
Attorney General may, by order,
schedule a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis. Such an order may not
be issued before the expiration of 30
days from (1) the publication of a notice
in the Federal Register of the intention
to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued,
and (2) the date that notice of the
proposed temporary scheduling order is
transmitted to the Assistant Secretary of
HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the
CSA directs that temporary scheduling
actions be issued by order and sets forth
the procedures by which such orders are
to be issued, the DEA believes that the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do
not apply to this notice of intent. In the
alternative, even assuming that this
notice of intent might be subject to
section 553 of the APA, the
Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo the notice and comment
requirements of section 553, as any
further delays in the process for
issuance of temporary scheduling orders
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest in view of the
manifest urgency to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Although the DEA believes this notice
of intent to issue a temporary
scheduling order is not subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553 of the APA, the DEA notes
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(4), the Administrator will take
into consideration any comments
submitted by the Assistant Secretary
with regard to the proposed temporary
scheduling order.
Further, the DEA believes that this
temporary scheduling action is not a
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2),
and, accordingly, is not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). The requirements
for the preparation of an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C.
603(a) are not applicable where, as here,
the DEA is not required by section 553
of the APA or any other law to publish
a general notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), section 3(f), and,
accordingly, this action has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) it is determined that this
action does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA
proposes to amend 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(26)
and (27) to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.11
Schedule I
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(26) N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-Nphenylbutyramide, its isomers, esters,
ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters
and ethers (Other names: butyryl
fentanyl)—(9822)
(27) N-[1-[2-hydroxy-2-(thiophen-2yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-Nphenylpropionamide, its isomers, esters,
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters
and ethers (Other names: betahydroxythiofentanyl)—(9836)
Dated: March 16, 2016.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–06468 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0141]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Space Coast
Super Boat Grand Prix; Atlantic Ocean,
Cocoa Beach, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a special local regulation on
the waters of the Atlantic Ocean
offshore from Cocoa Beach, FL during
the Space Coast Super Boat Grand Prix,
a series of high-speed boat races. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on the navigable waters
surrounding the event. This special
local regulation will be enforced from
10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on May 15, 2016. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the
regulated area unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville
or a designated representative. We
invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0141 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone (904) 714–7616,
email Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On January 30, 2016, Super Boat
International Productions, Inc. notified
the Coast Guard that it will be
conducting a series of high speed boat
races in the Atlantic Ocean, offshore
from Cocoa Beach, FL on May 15, 2016
from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. The COTP
Jacksonville has determined that the
potential hazards associated with high
speed boat races necessitate the
establishment of a special local
regulation.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of life on the navigable
waters of the United States by
prohibiting all vessels and persons not
participating in the event from entering
the regulated area. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
special local regulation for the Space
Coast Super Boat Grand Prix, a series of
high-speed boat races. The regulated
area includes the waters of the Atlantic
Ocean offshore from Cocoa Beach,
Florida and will be enforced daily from
10 a.m. to 5 p.m., on May 15, 2016.
Approximately 30 high-speed boats are
anticipated to participate in the races.
The regulated area would encompass an
offshore area that is approximately two
and a half nautical miles long by a half
nautical mile wide. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the
regulated area without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15489
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
The Coast Guard has determined that
this NPRM is not a significant regulatory
action for the following reasons: (1) The
special local regulation would be
enforced for a total of only seven hours;
(2) although persons and vessels would
not be able to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area without authorization
from the COTP Jacksonville or a
designated representative, they would
be able to operate in the surrounding
area during the enforcement period; (3)
persons and vessels would still be able
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area if
authorized by the COTP Jacksonville or
a designated representative; and (4) the
Coast Guard would provide advance
notification of the special local
regulation to the local maritime
community via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or by on-scene designated
representative.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
regulated area may be small entities, for
the reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15485-15489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06468]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-434]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of
Butyryl Fentanyl and Beta-Hydroxythiofentanyl Into Schedule I
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is
issuing this notice of intent to temporarily schedule the synthetic
opioids, N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylbutyramide (butyryl
fentanyl) and N-[1-[2-hydroxy-2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-N-
phenylpropionamide (beta-hydroxythiofentanyl), into schedule I pursuant
to the temporary scheduling provisions of the Controlled Substances
Act. This action is based on a finding by the Administrator that the
placement of these synthetic opioids into schedule I of the Controlled
Substances Act is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety. Any final order will impose the administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions and regulatory controls applicable to schedule I
controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act on the
manufacture, distribution, possession,
[[Page 15486]]
importation, and exportation of, and research and conduct with,
instructional activities of these synthetic opioids.
DATES: March 23, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara J. Boockholdt, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address:
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (202)
598-6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any final order will be published in the
Federal Register and may not be effective prior to April 22, 2016.
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) implements and enforces
titles II and III of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and
Control Act of 1970, as amended. 21 U.S.C. 801-971. Titles II and III
are referred to as the ``Controlled Substances Act'' and the
``Controlled Substances Import and Export Act,'' respectively, and are
collectively referred to as the ``Controlled Substances Act'' or the
``CSA'' for the purpose of this action. The DEA publishes the
implementing regulations for these statutes in title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter II. The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent, detect, and eliminate the
diversion of controlled substances and listed chemicals into the
illicit market while providing for the legitimate medical, scientific,
research, and industrial needs of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse and dependence and are
controlled to protect the public health and safety.
Under the CSA, each controlled substance is classified into one of
five schedules based upon its potential for abuse, its currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and the degree
of dependence the drug or other substance may cause. 21 U.S.C. 812. The
initial schedules of controlled substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c), and the current list of all scheduled
substances is published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811, provides the Attorney
General with the authority to temporarily place a substance into
schedule I of the CSA for two years without regard to the requirements
of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if she finds that such action is necessary to avoid
imminent hazard to the public safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C.
811(a)(1), the Attorney General may extend the temporary scheduling for
up to one year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be
temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under
section 202 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no exemption or
approval in effect for the substance under section 505 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). The Attorney General has delegated scheduling authority
under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of the DEA. 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) of his intention to temporarily place a substance
into schedule I of the CSA.\1\ The Administrator transmitted notice of
his intent to place butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in
schedule I on a temporary basis to the Assistant Secretary by letter
dated December 21, 2015 (received by the HHS on December 23, 2015). The
Assistant Secretary responded to this notice by letter dated January
13, 2016, and advised that based on review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug applications for butryl fentanyl or
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl. The Assistant Secretary also stated that the
HHS has no objection to the temporary placement of butryl fentanyl or
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl into schedule I of the CSA. Neither butryl
fentanyl nor beta-hydroxythiofentanyl are currently listed in any
schedule under the CSA, and no exemptions or approvals are in effect
for butryl fentanyl or beta-hydroxythiofentanyl under section 505 of
the FDCA, 21 U.S.C. 355. The DEA has found that the control of butryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in schedule I on a temporary
basis are necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to public safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As discussed in a memorandum of understanding entered into
by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institute
on Drug Abuse (NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency within the HHS
in carrying out the Secretary's scheduling responsibilities under
the CSA, with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1985. The
Secretary of the HHS has delegated to the Assistant Secretary for
Health of the HHS the authority to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find that placing a substance temporarily into schedule I of the
CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator is required to consider three of the eight factors set
forth in section 201(c) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(c): The substance's
history and current pattern of abuse; the scope, duration and
significance of abuse; and what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3). Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate channels, and clandestine
importation, manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling may only be placed in schedule I. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Substances in schedule I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1).
Butyryl Fentanyl and Beta-Hydroxythiofentanyl
Available data and information for butyryl fentanyl and beta-
hydroxythiofentanyl, summarized below, indicate that these synthetic
opioid substances have a high potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and a lack of
accepted safety for use under medical supervision. The DEA's three-
factor analysis is available in its entirety under of the public docket
of this action as a supporting document at www.regulations.gov under
Docket Number DEA-434.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of Abuse
Clandestinely produced substances structurally related to the
schedule II opioid analgesic fentanyl were trafficked and abused on the
West Coast in the late 1970s and 1980s. These clandestinely produced
fentanyl-like substances were commonly known as designer drugs, and
recently there has been a reemergence in the trafficking and abuse of
designer drug substances, including fentanyl-like substances. Alpha-
methylfentanyl, the first fentanyl analogue identified in California,
was placed into schedule I of the CSA in September 1981. 46 FR 46799.
Following the control of alpha-methylfentanyl, the DEA identified
several other fentanyl analogues (3-methylthiofentanyl, acetyl-alpha-
methylfentanyl, beta-hydroxy-3-methylfentanyl, alpha-
methylthiofentanyl, thiofentanyl, beta-hydroxyfentanyl, para-
fluorofentanyl, and 3-methylfentanyl) in submissions to forensic
laboratories. These substances were temporarily controlled under
[[Page 15487]]
schedule I of the CSA after finding that they posed an imminent hazard
to public safety and were subsequently permanently placed in schedule I
of the CSA. On July 17, 2015, acetyl fentanyl was temporarily
controlled under schedule I of the CSA after a finding by the
Administrator that it posed an imminent hazard to public safety. 80 FR
42381.
Prior to October 1, 2014, the System to Retrieve Information from
Drug Evidence (STRIDE) collected the results of drug evidence analyzed
at DEA laboratories and reflected evidence submitted by the DEA, other
federal law enforcement agencies, and some local law enforcement
agencies. STRIDE data were queried through September 30, 2014, by date
submitted to federal forensic laboratories. Since October 1, 2014,
STARLiMS (a web-based, commercial laboratory information management
system) has replaced STRIDE as the DEA laboratory drug evidence data
system of record. DEA laboratory data submitted after September 30,
2014, are reposited in STARLiMS. Data from STRIDE and STARLiMS were
queried on December 21, 2015. The National Forensic Laboratory
Information System (NFLIS) is a program of the DEA that collects drug
identification results from drug cases analyzed by other federal,
state, and local forensic laboratories. NFLIS reports from other
federal, state, and local forensic laboratories were queried on
December 22, 2015.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Data are still being reported for September-November 2015,
due to normal lag time for laboratories to report to NFLIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first laboratory submission of butyryl fentanyl was recorded in
Kansas in March 2014 according to NFLIS. STRIDE, STARLiMS and NFLIS
registered seven reports containing butyryl fentanyl in 2014 in
Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania; 81 reports of butyryl
fentanyl were recorded in 2015 in California, Connecticut, Florida,
Indiana, North Dakota, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia, and
Wisconsin. A total of three reports of beta-hydroxythiofentanyl were
recorded by STARLiMS, all of which were reported in 2015 from Florida.
To date, beta-hydroxythiofentanyl has not been reported in NFLIS;
however, this substance was identified in June 2015 by a forensic
laboratory in Oregon.
Evidence also suggests that the pattern of abuse of fentanyl
analogues, including butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl,
parallels that of heroin and prescription opioid analgesics. Seizures
of butyryl fentanyl have been encountered in tablet and powder form.
Butyryl fentanyl was identified on bottle caps and spoons and residue
was detected within glassine bags, on digital scales, and on sifters
which demonstrates the abuse of this substance as a replacement for
heroin or other opioids, either knowingly or unknowingly. Butyryl
fentanyl has been encountered as a single substance as well as in
combination with other illicit substances, such as acetyl fentanyl,
heroin, cocaine, or methamphetamine. Like butyryl fentanyl, beta-
hydroxythiofentanyl has been encountered in both tablet and powder
form. Both butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl have caused
fatal overdoses, in which intravenous routes of administration are
documented.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and Significance of Abuse
The DEA is currently aware of at least 40 confirmed fatalities
associated with butyryl fentanyl and 7 confirmed fatalities associated
with beta-hydroxythiofentanyl. The information on these deaths
occurring in 2015 was collected from toxicology and medical examiner
reports and was reported from four states--Florida (7, beta-
hydroxythiofentanyl), Maryland (1, butyryl fentanyl), New York (38,
butyryl fentanyl), and Oregon (1, butyryl fentanyl). STRIDE, STARLiMS,
and NFLIS have a total of 88 drug reports in which butyryl fentanyl was
identified in drug exhibits submitted in 2014 and 2015 from California,
Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, North
Dakota, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and
Wisconsin. STARLiMS has a total of three drug reports in which beta-
hydroxythiofentanyl was identified in drug exhibits submitted in 2015
from Florida. It is likely that the prevalence of butyryl fentanyl and
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in opioid analgesic-related emergency room
admissions and deaths is underreported as standard immunoassays cannot
differentiate these substances from fentanyl.
The population likely to abuse butyryl fentanyl and beta-
hydroxythiofentanyl overlaps with the populations abusing prescription
opioid analgesics and heroin. This is evidenced by the routes of
administration and drug use history documented in butyryl fentanyl and
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl fatal overdose cases. Because abusers of these
fentanyl analogues are likely to obtain these substances through
illicit sources, the identity, purity, and quantity is uncertain and
inconsistent, thus posing significant adverse health risks to abusers
of butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl. Individuals who
initiate (i.e. use an illicit drug for the first time) butyryl fentanyl
or beta-hydroxythiofentanyl abuse are likely to be at risk of
developing substance use disorder, overdose, and death similar to that
of other opioid analgesics (e.g., fentanyl, morphine, etc.).
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to the Public Health
Butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl exhibit
pharmacological profiles similar to that of fentanyl and other mu-
opioid receptor agonists. Due to limited scientific data, their potency
and toxicity are not known; however, the toxic effects of both butyryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in humans are demonstrated by
overdose fatalities involving these substances. Abusers of these
fentanyl analogues may not know the origin, identity, or purity of
these substances, thus posing significant adverse health risks when
compared to abuse of pharmaceutical preparations of opioid analgesics,
such as morphine and oxycodone.
Based on the documented case reports of overdose fatalities, the
abuse of butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl leads to the
same qualitative public health risks as heroin, fentanyl and other
opioid analgesic substances. The public health risks attendant to the
abuse of heroin and opioid analgesics are well established and have
resulted in large numbers of drug treatment admissions, emergency
department visits, and fatal overdoses.
Butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl have been associated
with numerous fatalities. At least 40 confirmed overdose deaths
involving butyryl fentanyl abuse have been reported in Maryland (1),
New York (38), and Oregon (1) in 2015. At least seven confirmed
overdose fatalities involving beta-hydroxythiofentanyl have been
reported in Florida in 2015. This indicates that both butyryl fentanyl
and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl pose an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information, summarized above, the continued uncontrolled
manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution, importation,
exportation, conduct of research and chemical analysis, possession, and
abuse of butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl pose an imminent
hazard to the public
[[Page 15488]]
safety. The DEA is not aware of any currently accepted medical uses for
these substances in the United States. A substance meeting the
statutory requirements for temporary scheduling, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1),
may only be placed in schedule I. Substances in schedule I are those
that have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use
in treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for
use under medical supervision. Available data and information for
butyryl fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl indicate that these
substances have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical supervision. As required by section
201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator, through a
letter dated December 21, 2015, notified the Assistant Secretary of the
DEA's intention to temporarily place this substance in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates an expedited temporary scheduling
action and provides the 30-day notice pursuant to section 201(h) of the
CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h). In accordance with the provisions of section
201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator considered
available data and information, herein set forth the grounds for his
determination that it is necessary to temporarily schedule butyryl
fentanyl and beta-hydroxythiofentanyl in schedule I of the CSA, and
finds that placement of these opioid substances into schedule I of the
CSA is necessary in order to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
Because the Administrator hereby finds that it is necessary to
temporarily place these synthetic opioids into schedule I to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety, any subsequent final order
temporarily scheduling these substances will be effective on the date
of publication in the Federal Register, and will be in effect for a
period of two years, with a possible extension of one additional year,
pending completion of the regular (permanent) scheduling process. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (2). It is the intention of the Administrator to
issue such a final order as soon as possible after the expiration of 30
days from the date of publication of this notice. Butyryl fentanyl and
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl will then be subject to the regulatory
controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable
to the manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution, importation,
exportation, research, conduct of instructional activities and chemical
analysis, and possession of a schedule I controlled substance.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for scheduling a drug or other
substance. Regular scheduling actions in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(a) are subject to formal rulemaking procedures done ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing'' conducted pursuant to the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. 21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling process
of formal rulemaking affords interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any additional relevant information
needed to make a determination. Final decisions that conclude the
regular scheduling process of formal rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h), provides for an
expedited temporary scheduling action where such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. As provided in this
subsection, the Attorney General may, by order, schedule a substance in
schedule I on a temporary basis. Such an order may not be issued before
the expiration of 30 days from (1) the publication of a notice in the
Federal Register of the intention to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued, and (2) the date that notice of
the proposed temporary scheduling order is transmitted to the Assistant
Secretary of HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the CSA directs that temporary
scheduling actions be issued by order and sets forth the procedures by
which such orders are to be issued, the DEA believes that the notice
and comment requirements of section 553 of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this notice of intent. In the
alternative, even assuming that this notice of intent might be subject
to section 553 of the APA, the Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo the notice and comment requirements of section 553, as
any further delays in the process for issuance of temporary scheduling
orders would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest in
view of the manifest urgency to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
Although the DEA believes this notice of intent to issue a
temporary scheduling order is not subject to the notice and comment
requirements of section 553 of the APA, the DEA notes that in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator will take into
consideration any comments submitted by the Assistant Secretary with
regard to the proposed temporary scheduling order.
Further, the DEA believes that this temporary scheduling action is
not a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), and, accordingly, is not
subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
The requirements for the preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable where, as
here, the DEA is not required by section 553 of the APA or any other
law to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
section 3(f), and, accordingly, this action has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132 (Federalism) it is determined that this action does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA proposes to amend 21 CFR
part 1308 as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(26) and (27) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1308.11 Schedule I
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(26) N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylbutyramide, its isomers,
esters, ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters and ethers (Other
names: butyryl fentanyl)--(9822)
(27) N-[1-[2-hydroxy-2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-N-
phenylpropionamide, its isomers, esters,
[[Page 15489]]
ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters and ethers (Other names:
beta-hydroxythiofentanyl)--(9836)
Dated: March 16, 2016.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-06468 Filed 3-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P