Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Address Canvassing Test, 15505-15507 [2016-06466]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Notices
to make oral statements of three minutes
or less. Individuals wishing to make an
oral statement should request in writing
by April 15, 2016, to be scheduled on
the agenda. Anyone who would like to
bring related matters to the attention of
the committee may file written
statements with the committee staff
before or after the meeting. Written
comments and requests for time for oral
comments must be sent to Lynn Ballard,
RAC Coordinator, Caribou-Targhee NF
Supervisor’s Office, 1405 Hollipark
Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401; by
email to lballard@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 208–557–5827.
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices
or other reasonable accommodation for
access to the facility or proceedings by
contacting the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case by case basis.
Dated: March 8, 2016.
Garth Smelser,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2016–06487 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting
of the New Mexico Advisory
Committee
Commission on Civil Rights.
Announcement of meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights (Commission), and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), that a planning meeting of the
New Mexico Advisory Committee to the
Commission will convene at 10:00 a.m.
(MDT) on Thursday, March 24, 2016,
via teleconference. The purpose of the
meeting is to review and vote on project
proposal on elder abuse. The committee
will also discuss and establish
subcommittees.
Members of the public may listen to
the discussion by dialing the following
Conference Call Toll-Free Number: 1–
888–455–2260; Conference ID: 8138480.
Please be advised that before being
placed into the conference call, the
operator will ask callers to provide their
names, their organizational affiliations
(if any), and an email address (if
available) prior to placing callers into
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:26 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
the conference room. Callers can expect
to incur charges for calls they initiate
over wireless lines, and the Commission
will not refund any incurred charges.
Callers will incur no charge for calls
they initiate over land-line connections
to the toll-free phone number.
Persons with hearing impairments
may also follow the discussion by first
calling the Federal Relay Service (FRS)
at 1–800–977–8339 and provide the FRS
operator with the Conference Call TollFree Number: 1–888–455–2260,
Conference ID: 8138480. Members of the
public are invited to submit written
comments; the comments must be
received in the regional office by
Monday, April 25, 2016. Written
comments may be mailed to the Rocky
Mountain Regional Office, U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights, 1961 Stout
Street, Suite 13–201, Denver, CO 80294,
faxed to (303) 866–1050, or emailed to
Evelyn Bohor at ebohor@usccr.gov.
Persons who desire additional
information may contact the Rocky
Mountain Regional Office at (303) 866–
1040.
Records and documents discussed
during the meeting will be available for
public viewing as they become available
at https://database.faca.gov/committee/
meetings.aspx?cid=264 and clicking on
the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and ‘‘Documents’’
links. Records generated from this
meeting may also be inspected and
reproduced at the Rocky Mountain
Regional Office, as they become
available, both before and after the
meeting. Persons interested in the work
of this advisory committee are advised
to go to the Commission’s Web site,
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky
Mountain Regional Office at the above
phone number, email or street address.
Agenda
• Welcome and Introductions
Sandra Rodriguez, Chair, New Mexico
Advisory Committee
Malee V. Craft, Regional Director,
Rocky Mountain Regional Office
(RMRO)
• Review and vote on project proposal
on Elder Abuse
• Establish subcommittees
• Next Steps
DATES: Thursday, March 24, 2016, at
10:00 a.m. (MDT)
ADDRESSES: To be held via
teleconference:
Conference Call Toll-Free Number: 1–
888–455–2260, Conference ID:
8138480.
TDD: Dial Federal Relay Service 1–800–
977–8339 and give the operator the
above conference call number and
conference ID.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15505
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Malee V. Craft, DFO, mcraft@usccr.gov,
303–866–1040.
Exceptional Circumstance: Pursuant
to 41 CFR 102–3.150, the notice for this
meeting is given less than 15 calendar
days prior to the meeting because of the
exceptional circumstances of technical
difficulties. Given the exceptional
urgency of the events, the agency and
advisory committee deem it important
for the advisory committee to meet on
the date given.
Dated: March 18, 2016.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2016–06538 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Address
Canvassing Test
U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before May 23, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Robin A. Pennington,
Census Bureau, HQ–2K281N,
Washington, DC 20233; (301) 763–8132
(or via email at robin.a.pennington@
census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
During the years preceding the 2020
Census, the Census Bureau will pursue
its commitment to reduce the costs of
conducting a decennial census, while
maintaining our commitment to quality.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
15506
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
With cost reductions in mind, the
Census Bureau is focusing on Key
Innovation Areas, which includes
reengineering the 2020 Census Address
Canvassing Operation. The goal of
Reengineering Address Canvassing is to
ensure an accurate address frame is
developed utilizing innovative
methodologies and data for updating the
Master Address File (MAF)/
Topologically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing (TIGER)
System throughout the decade.
The Address Canvassing Test, which
occurs in the fall of 2016, will include
two major components of the
reengineered Address Canvassing
operation: In-Office Address Canvassing
and In-Field Address Canvassing. The
purpose of the test is to determine the
accuracy and feasibility of some of the
planned innovations for Address
Canvassing. The Census Bureau believes
that there are other means for
accomplishing the address list updates
and determining which areas have
housing changes without canvassing
every single block in the field just before
the census. The Address Canvassing
Test will examine these new methods,
which will allow decisions to be made
about their feasibility for use within the
decennial census.
The following objectives are crucial to
a successful Address Canvassing Test:
• Implementing all In-Office Address
Canvassing processes, including
Interactive Review (IR), Active Block
Resolution (ABR), MAF Updating and
Identification of the In-Field Address
Canvassing workload.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of
online training for Field Supervisors
and Field Representatives.
• Measuring the effectiveness of InOffice Address Canvassing through InField Address Canvassing.
• Integrating multiple information
technology applications to create one
seamless operational data collection,
control and management system.
Background
The purpose of the Address
Canvassing Operation is (1) to deliver a
complete and accurate address list and
spatial database for enumeration and
tabulation, and (2) to determine the type
and address characteristics for each
living quarter. A complete and accurate
address list and map is the cornerstone
of a successful census.
For the 2010 Census, Address
Canvassing field staff, referred to as
listers, traversed almost every block in
the nation to compare what they
observed on the ground to the contents
of the Census Bureau’s address list.
Listers verified or corrected addresses
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:26 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
that were on the list, added new
addresses to the list, and deleted
addresses that no longer existed. Listers
also collected map spot locations (i.e.,
Global Positioning System coordinates)
for each structure and added new
streets.
In addition to Address Canvassing,
the Census Bureau conducted the Group
Quarters Validation (GQV) operation
after the Address Canvassing operation
and prior to enumeration for the 2010
Census. The purpose of the GQV
operation was to improve the Group
Quarters (GQ) frame. A GQ is a place
where people live or stay, in a group
living arrangement, that is owned or
managed by an entity or organization
providing housing and/or services for
the residents. This is not a typical
household-type living arrangement, and
residency is commonly restricted to
those receiving specific services. People
living in GQs are usually not related to
each other. Types of GQs include such
places as college residence halls,
residential treatment centers, skillednursing facilities, group homes, military
barracks, correctional facilities, and
workers’ dormitories. Services offered
may include custodial or medical care
as well as other types of assistance.
For the 2010 Census GQV operation,
field staff visited a specific address to
determine if it was a GQ, housing unit,
transitory location, a non-residential
unit, or if it was nonexistent. If the
address was a GQ, the lister conducted
an in-person interview with the GQ
contact person to determine a type of
GQ and collect additional information
to plan for enumeration. In support of
a more efficient census design strategy,
the 2020 Census will not conduct a
separate operation to validate GQ
information. Instead, the 2020 Census
will validate GQ information during the
Address Canvassing operation.
Transitory Locations are recreational
vehicle parks, campgrounds, hotels,
motels, marinas, racetracks, circuses
and carnivals. Transitory Locations are
not in scope for the Address Canvassing
Test.
2020 Census Address Canvassing: InOffice Address Canvassing
In-Office Address Canvassing is the
process of using empirical geographic
evidence (e.g., imagery, comparison of
the Census Bureau’s address list to
partner-provided lists) to assess the
current address list and make changes
where necessary. This component
removes geographic areas from the InField Address Canvassing workload
based on the determination of address
stability. In addition, this component
detects and captures change from high
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
quality administrative and third-party
data, reducing the In-Field Address
Canvassing workload.
In-Office Address Canvassing starts
with Interactive Review (IR), which is
an imagery-based review to assess the
extent to which the number of
addresses—both housing units and
Group Quarters—in the census address
list are consistent with the number of
addresses visible in current imagery. It
also assesses the changes between the
current imagery and an older vintage of
imagery (around the time of 2010
Address Canvassing).
Results from IR inform the Active
Block Resolution (ABR) process, which
seeks to research and update areas
identified with growth, decline,
undercoverage of addresses, or
overcoverage of addresses from the
comparison of the two different vintages
of imagery and counts of addresses in
the MAF. In addition to using the
results from IR, the ABR process uses
other data sources to resolve the
identified issues in the office and to
update the MAF rather than sending
these areas to In-Field Address
Canvassing. The other data sources
include local Geographic Information
Systems (GIS) viewers available online,
parcel data, local files acquired through
the U.S. Census Bureau’s Geographic
Support System (GSS) program, and
commercial data. Areas not resolved in
the office become the universe of
geographic areas worked during In-Field
Address Canvassing.
2020 Census Address Canvasing: InField Address Canvassing
In-Field Address Canvassing is the
process of having field staff visit
specific geographic areas to identify
every place where people could live or
stay. Field staff compare what they see
on the ground to the existing census
address list and either verify or correct
the address and location information.
Field staff also classify each living
quarter (LQ) as a housing unit or GQ.
Field staff (listers) will knock on doors
at every structure in an attempt to locate
LQs. If someone answers, the lister will
provide a Confidentiality Notice and ask
about the address in order to verify or
update the information, as appropriate.
The listers will then ask if there are any
additional LQs in the structure or on the
property. If there are additional LQs, the
listers will collect/update that
information, as appropriate. If the lister
does not find anyone at home, they will
update the address list as best they can
by observation.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Notices
II. Method of Collection
Universe
The Address Canvassing Test occurs
in two sites within the continental
United States. Each site is comprised of
4,000 blocks with up to 125,000
addresses in each site. All living
quarters in the test sites are included in
the In-Office Address Canvassing
workload, as well as the In-Field
Address Canvassing workload. For the
In-Field Address Canvassing data
collection, listers will knock on every
door to ask residents about their living
quarters. However, the Census Bureau
expects that they would make contact
with residents (i.e., someone is at home)
at most 50 percent of the time.
In-Field Address Canvassing
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
In-Field Address Canvassing will hire
new field listers, who are primarily
inexperienced with census listing
activities. Listers will receive work
assignments grouped by geography and
in close proximity to the lister’s
residence (whenever possible). Field
staff will use the Census Bureau’s
Listing and Mapping Application
(LiMA) software on government
furnished smartphone devices.
Dated: March 17, 2016.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
Current Design Strategy
[A–570–848]
In order to assess and accomplish the
stated objectives described above, both
In-Office Address Canvassing clerical
staff and In-Field Address Canvassing
listers will work every block in the two
test sites. This allows for the
comparison of results from both InOffice Address Canvassing and In-Field
Address Canvasing to measure the
effectiveness of In-Office Address
Canvassing procedures and processes.
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From
the People’s Republic of China:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review in Part; 2014–
2015
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607–XXXX.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Review: Regular Submission.
Affected Public: Households/
Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
62,500 Households.
Estimated Time per Response: 5 min/
Household.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 5,208.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: The only cost to respondents is
that of their time to respond.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 United States
Code, Sections 141 and 193.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:26 Mar 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–06466 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding its
administrative review in part on
freshwater crawfish tail meat from the
People’s Republic of China for the
period of review (POR) September 1,
2014, through August 31, 2015.
DATES: Effective Date: March 23, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On September 1, 2015, we published
a notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat from the People’s
Republic of China for the POR
September 1, 2014, through August 31,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15507
2015.1 On November 9, 2015, in
response to timely requests from the
petitioners,2 China Kingdom (Beijing)
Import & Export Co., Ltd, Deyan Aquatic
Products and Food Co., Ltd (Deyan), and
Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuff Co., Ltd, and
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat from the People’s
Republic of China with respect to nine
companies.3 On February 2, 2016, the
petitioners withdrew their request for an
administrative review for six out of nine
companies, Deyan, Hubei Yuesheng
Aquatic Products Co., Ltd., Nanjing
Gemsen International Co., Ltd., Weishan
Hongda Aquatic Food Co., Ltd., Xiping
Opeck Food Co., Ltd., and Yancheng HiKing Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd.4
On February 11, 2016, Deyan withdrew
its request for an administrative
review.5
On January 27, 2016, the Department
exercised its discretion to toll its
administrative deadlines due to the
closure of the Federal Government.
Thus, the deadline for withdrawing a
request for an administrative review was
extended by four business days. The
revised deadline for withdrawing an
administrative review was February 12,
2016.6 Therefore, Deyan’s withdrawal
request for an administrative review was
timely.
Rescission of Administrative Review in
Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, ‘‘in whole or in
part, if a party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review.’’
Because the petitioners and Deyan
withdrew their review requests in a
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 52741
(September 1, 2015).
2 Crawfish Processors Alliance (collectively, the
petitioners).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
69193 (November 9, 2015).
4 See letter from the petitioners to the
Department, ‘‘Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from
the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of
Certain Requests for 2014–15 Administrative
Review’’ dated February 2, 2016.
5 See letter from Deyan to the Department titled,
‘‘Re: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
People’s Republic of China Withdrawal of Request
for Review’’ dated February 11, 2016.
6 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement &
Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure
During Snowstorm ‘Jonas’ ’’ dated January 27, 2016.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15505-15507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06466]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Address
Canvassing Test
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before May 23, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Robin A. Pennington, Census Bureau, HQ-2K281N,
Washington, DC 20233; (301) 763-8132 (or via email at
robin.a.pennington@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
During the years preceding the 2020 Census, the Census Bureau will
pursue its commitment to reduce the costs of conducting a decennial
census, while maintaining our commitment to quality.
[[Page 15506]]
With cost reductions in mind, the Census Bureau is focusing on Key
Innovation Areas, which includes reengineering the 2020 Census Address
Canvassing Operation. The goal of Reengineering Address Canvassing is
to ensure an accurate address frame is developed utilizing innovative
methodologies and data for updating the Master Address File (MAF)/
Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (TIGER)
System throughout the decade.
The Address Canvassing Test, which occurs in the fall of 2016, will
include two major components of the reengineered Address Canvassing
operation: In-Office Address Canvassing and In-Field Address
Canvassing. The purpose of the test is to determine the accuracy and
feasibility of some of the planned innovations for Address Canvassing.
The Census Bureau believes that there are other means for accomplishing
the address list updates and determining which areas have housing
changes without canvassing every single block in the field just before
the census. The Address Canvassing Test will examine these new methods,
which will allow decisions to be made about their feasibility for use
within the decennial census.
The following objectives are crucial to a successful Address
Canvassing Test:
Implementing all In-Office Address Canvassing processes,
including Interactive Review (IR), Active Block Resolution (ABR), MAF
Updating and Identification of the In-Field Address Canvassing
workload.
Evaluating the effectiveness of online training for Field
Supervisors and Field Representatives.
Measuring the effectiveness of In-Office Address
Canvassing through In-Field Address Canvassing.
Integrating multiple information technology applications
to create one seamless operational data collection, control and
management system.
Background
The purpose of the Address Canvassing Operation is (1) to deliver a
complete and accurate address list and spatial database for enumeration
and tabulation, and (2) to determine the type and address
characteristics for each living quarter. A complete and accurate
address list and map is the cornerstone of a successful census.
For the 2010 Census, Address Canvassing field staff, referred to as
listers, traversed almost every block in the nation to compare what
they observed on the ground to the contents of the Census Bureau's
address list. Listers verified or corrected addresses that were on the
list, added new addresses to the list, and deleted addresses that no
longer existed. Listers also collected map spot locations (i.e., Global
Positioning System coordinates) for each structure and added new
streets.
In addition to Address Canvassing, the Census Bureau conducted the
Group Quarters Validation (GQV) operation after the Address Canvassing
operation and prior to enumeration for the 2010 Census. The purpose of
the GQV operation was to improve the Group Quarters (GQ) frame. A GQ is
a place where people live or stay, in a group living arrangement, that
is owned or managed by an entity or organization providing housing and/
or services for the residents. This is not a typical household-type
living arrangement, and residency is commonly restricted to those
receiving specific services. People living in GQs are usually not
related to each other. Types of GQs include such places as college
residence halls, residential treatment centers, skilled-nursing
facilities, group homes, military barracks, correctional facilities,
and workers' dormitories. Services offered may include custodial or
medical care as well as other types of assistance.
For the 2010 Census GQV operation, field staff visited a specific
address to determine if it was a GQ, housing unit, transitory location,
a non-residential unit, or if it was nonexistent. If the address was a
GQ, the lister conducted an in-person interview with the GQ contact
person to determine a type of GQ and collect additional information to
plan for enumeration. In support of a more efficient census design
strategy, the 2020 Census will not conduct a separate operation to
validate GQ information. Instead, the 2020 Census will validate GQ
information during the Address Canvassing operation.
Transitory Locations are recreational vehicle parks, campgrounds,
hotels, motels, marinas, racetracks, circuses and carnivals. Transitory
Locations are not in scope for the Address Canvassing Test.
2020 Census Address Canvassing: In-Office Address Canvassing
In-Office Address Canvassing is the process of using empirical
geographic evidence (e.g., imagery, comparison of the Census Bureau's
address list to partner-provided lists) to assess the current address
list and make changes where necessary. This component removes
geographic areas from the In-Field Address Canvassing workload based on
the determination of address stability. In addition, this component
detects and captures change from high quality administrative and third-
party data, reducing the In-Field Address Canvassing workload.
In-Office Address Canvassing starts with Interactive Review (IR),
which is an imagery-based review to assess the extent to which the
number of addresses--both housing units and Group Quarters--in the
census address list are consistent with the number of addresses visible
in current imagery. It also assesses the changes between the current
imagery and an older vintage of imagery (around the time of 2010
Address Canvassing).
Results from IR inform the Active Block Resolution (ABR) process,
which seeks to research and update areas identified with growth,
decline, undercoverage of addresses, or overcoverage of addresses from
the comparison of the two different vintages of imagery and counts of
addresses in the MAF. In addition to using the results from IR, the ABR
process uses other data sources to resolve the identified issues in the
office and to update the MAF rather than sending these areas to In-
Field Address Canvassing. The other data sources include local
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) viewers available online, parcel
data, local files acquired through the U.S. Census Bureau's Geographic
Support System (GSS) program, and commercial data. Areas not resolved
in the office become the universe of geographic areas worked during In-
Field Address Canvassing.
2020 Census Address Canvasing: In-Field Address Canvassing
In-Field Address Canvassing is the process of having field staff
visit specific geographic areas to identify every place where people
could live or stay. Field staff compare what they see on the ground to
the existing census address list and either verify or correct the
address and location information. Field staff also classify each living
quarter (LQ) as a housing unit or GQ. Field staff (listers) will knock
on doors at every structure in an attempt to locate LQs. If someone
answers, the lister will provide a Confidentiality Notice and ask about
the address in order to verify or update the information, as
appropriate. The listers will then ask if there are any additional LQs
in the structure or on the property. If there are additional LQs, the
listers will collect/update that information, as appropriate. If the
lister does not find anyone at home, they will update the address list
as best they can by observation.
[[Page 15507]]
II. Method of Collection
Universe
The Address Canvassing Test occurs in two sites within the
continental United States. Each site is comprised of 4,000 blocks with
up to 125,000 addresses in each site. All living quarters in the test
sites are included in the In-Office Address Canvassing workload, as
well as the In-Field Address Canvassing workload. For the In-Field
Address Canvassing data collection, listers will knock on every door to
ask residents about their living quarters. However, the Census Bureau
expects that they would make contact with residents (i.e., someone is
at home) at most 50 percent of the time.
In-Field Address Canvassing
In-Field Address Canvassing will hire new field listers, who are
primarily inexperienced with census listing activities. Listers will
receive work assignments grouped by geography and in close proximity to
the lister's residence (whenever possible). Field staff will use the
Census Bureau's Listing and Mapping Application (LiMA) software on
government furnished smartphone devices.
Current Design Strategy
In order to assess and accomplish the stated objectives described
above, both In-Office Address Canvassing clerical staff and In-Field
Address Canvassing listers will work every block in the two test sites.
This allows for the comparison of results from both In-Office Address
Canvassing and In-Field Address Canvasing to measure the effectiveness
of In-Office Address Canvassing procedures and processes.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607-XXXX.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Review: Regular Submission.
Affected Public: Households/Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 62,500 Households.
Estimated Time per Response: 5 min/Household.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 5,208.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: The only cost to respondents
is that of their time to respond.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 United States Code, Sections 141 and 193.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 17, 2016.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-06466 Filed 3-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P