Petition for Waiver of Compliance and Statutory Exemption, 15146-15147 [2016-06213]
Download as PDF
15146
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2016 / Notices
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–06214 Filed 3–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2016–0018]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Petition for Waiver of Compliance and
Statutory Exemption
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document received
February 5, 2016, the Association of
American Railroads (AAR), on behalf of
itself and its member railroads, has
petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of
the Federal railroad safety regulations
contained at 49 CFR part 232—Brake
System Safety Standards for Freight and
Other Non-Passenger Trains and
Equipment; End-of-Train Devices. FRA
assigned the petition Docket Number
FRA–2016–0018.
In its petition, AAR seeks a waiver of
compliance from 49 CFR 232.213—
Extended haul trains, 49 CFR 232.15—
Movement of defective equipment, and
49 CFR 232.103(f)—General
requirements for all train brake systems.
The current rules state that extended
haul trains are permitted to move a train
up to, but not exceeding, 1,500 miles
between brake tests and inspections [49
CFR 232.213(a)]. In addition, current
rules require that equipment with
defective or insecure power brakes only
be moved from the place at which the
defect or insecurity was first discovered
to the nearest available place at which
the repairs can be made (49 CFR 232.15
and 49 U.S.C. 20303), and each car in
a train must have the air brakes in
effective operating conditions unless the
car is being moved for repairs in
accordance with 49 CFR 232.15 [49 CFR
232.103(f)]. AAR presently petitions
FRA for a 5-year waiver from these
requirements to permit a limited pilot
program conducted on a segment of the
Union Pacific Railroad (UP) system to
demonstrate that the use of wheel
temperature detectors (WTD) to
determine brake effectiveness will
improve safety and eliminate
unnecessary costs to the industry. AAR
previously submitted a waiver petition
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
in this matter on July 19, 2013. That
waiver petition was denied by FRA in
a letter dated June 20, 2014 (see Docket
Number FRA–2013–0080). AAR has
revised that waiver petition and
accompanying Safety Assurance Plan
(SAP) in accordance with further
technical considerations and an
evaluation of the similar exemption
currently in effect in Canada.
Through a limited pilot effort, AAR
intends to demonstrate the effectiveness
of using wayside WTD data to ensure
safe braking performance. The focus of
this pilot will be revenue service unit
coal trains running on the UP system
between Wyoming’s Powder River Basin
and an unloading facility in White Bluff,
AR, a round trip of approximately 2,600
miles. The WTD that monitors the
system is located at Sheep Creek, WY.
Under current UP operating practices,
the coal trains running in this service
are classified as extended haul trains
and operate intact up to 1,500 miles
between brake tests required under 49
CFR part 232. The waiver requested
would extend the distance between
required tests up to an additional
potential 1,100 miles, bypassing
approximately one visual inspection.
Each test train will receive a Class 1
brake test in accordance with 49 CFR
232.205 and a predeparture inspection
in accordance with 49 CFR 215.13 at
North Platte, NE. The trains will then
leave North Platte and travel to a coal
loading facility in the Powder River
Basin. The train cars will be loaded with
coal and then return to North Platte,
passing the WTD monitors at Sheep
Creek for recording of braking
performance, continuing through North
Platte through Van Buren, AR, and then
to an unloading facility in White Bluff.
The train cars will be unloaded in White
Bluff, and then the train will return to
the terminus at North Platte via Van
Buren.
In its petition, AAR states preliminary
tests conducted with the WTD system
indicate that the system identifies cars
with ineffective brakes at a significantly
higher rate (about four times more) than
Intermediate Brake Tests. This is
because the WTD system detects cars
with ineffective brakes, even though
they might still meet the criteria of a
Class 1 or Intermediate Brake Test.
Identification of such cars by the WTD
system will result in those cars being
repaired earlier, with the eventual result
that a greater percentage of cars in any
train would have effective brakes. AAR
expects this will result in improved
train safety.
Finally, AAR also requests an
exemption from the statutory
requirements at 49 U.S.C. 20303, which
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mandate that a rail vehicle with
defective or insecure equipment may be
moved to make repairs only to the
nearest available place at which the
repairs can be made. In requesting this
exemption, AAR invokes the process at
49 U.S.C. 20306, which states that the
U.S. Secretary of Transportation may
provide such an exemption when
existing requirements preclude the
development or implementation of more
efficient railroad transportation
equipment or other transportation
innovations under existing law. As
delineated in the SAP, the WTD system
is a superior method to manage brake
health as compared with the current
process found in the Federal brake
system safety standards. AAR requests a
hearing during which evidence can be
developed per 49 U.S.C. 20306 for a
statutory exemption to 49 U.S.C. 20303.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA will in the future
schedule a public hearing in connection
with these proceedings as requested by
AAR pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 20306. If any
interested party desires an opportunity
for oral comment, they should notify
FRA, in writing, before the end of the
comment period and specify the basis
for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by May 5,
2016 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far
as practicable.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2016 / Notices
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). In
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT
solicits comments from the public to
better inform its processes. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the
commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy. See also https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacy. Notice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–06213 Filed 3–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0034]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2016–0034 using any of the
following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Kristie Johnson, Office of Behavioral
Safety Research (NPD–310), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46–498,
Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Johnson’s
phone number is 202–366–2755 and her
email address is kristie.johnson@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: Countermeasures That Work
(9th and 10th Editions) and
Countermeasures At Work (1st and 2nd
Editions).
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15147
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Numbers: NHTSA 1343 and
NHTSA 1344.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to collect user feedback on the
Countermeasures That Work and
Countermeasures At Work guides. These
guides were developed for the State
Highway Safety Offices (SHSOs) to
assist them in developing programs for
implementing safety countermeasures in
nine program area of alcohol-impaired
and drugged driving, seat belt use and
child restraints, aggressive driving and
speeding, distracted and drowsy
driving, motorcycle safety, young
drivers, older drivers, pedestrians, and
bicyclists. The Countermeasures That
Work guide covers each of these
program areas in separate chapters that
include a short background section
relaying current data trends, which is
followed by a description of applicable
countermeasures, and an explanation
their effectiveness, use, costs, and time
to implement. The Countermeasures At
Work guide will elaborate on some of
the countermeasures contained in the
Countermeasures That Work guide by
providing real world examples and
details on localities where specific
countermeasures were put into place.
The countermeasure descriptions may
include details about locality size,
implementation issues, cost,
stakeholders to involve, challenges,
evaluation, and outcomes. To collect
this information for the new guide
NHTSA proposes to collect information
from representatives from the SHSOs
and/or local jurisdictions, in addition to
representative from Governors Highway
Safety Association (GHSA), State
Coordinators, and other relevant
stakeholders. The survey will ask the
representatives about the following
information:
• Their background, including job
roles and responsibilities, which
provide context for document use,
• What are their key information
needs for the document, including
obtaining details of specific use-case
examples such as locality size,
implementation issues, cost,
stakeholders to involve, challenges,
evaluation, and outcomes,
• Opinions on document structure,
format, and content, which includes
using a consistent question format for
different information items/sections in
the document,
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15146-15147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06213]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA-2016-0018]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance and Statutory Exemption
In accordance with part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
received February 5, 2016, the Association of American Railroads (AAR),
on behalf of itself and its member railroads, has petitioned the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained
at 49 CFR part 232--Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other
Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment; End-of-Train Devices. FRA assigned
the petition Docket Number FRA-2016-0018.
In its petition, AAR seeks a waiver of compliance from 49 CFR
232.213--Extended haul trains, 49 CFR 232.15--Movement of defective
equipment, and 49 CFR 232.103(f)--General requirements for all train
brake systems. The current rules state that extended haul trains are
permitted to move a train up to, but not exceeding, 1,500 miles between
brake tests and inspections [49 CFR 232.213(a)]. In addition, current
rules require that equipment with defective or insecure power brakes
only be moved from the place at which the defect or insecurity was
first discovered to the nearest available place at which the repairs
can be made (49 CFR 232.15 and 49 U.S.C. 20303), and each car in a
train must have the air brakes in effective operating conditions unless
the car is being moved for repairs in accordance with 49 CFR 232.15 [49
CFR 232.103(f)]. AAR presently petitions FRA for a 5-year waiver from
these requirements to permit a limited pilot program conducted on a
segment of the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) system to demonstrate that
the use of wheel temperature detectors (WTD) to determine brake
effectiveness will improve safety and eliminate unnecessary costs to
the industry. AAR previously submitted a waiver petition in this matter
on July 19, 2013. That waiver petition was denied by FRA in a letter
dated June 20, 2014 (see Docket Number FRA-2013-0080). AAR has revised
that waiver petition and accompanying Safety Assurance Plan (SAP) in
accordance with further technical considerations and an evaluation of
the similar exemption currently in effect in Canada.
Through a limited pilot effort, AAR intends to demonstrate the
effectiveness of using wayside WTD data to ensure safe braking
performance. The focus of this pilot will be revenue service unit coal
trains running on the UP system between Wyoming's Powder River Basin
and an unloading facility in White Bluff, AR, a round trip of
approximately 2,600 miles. The WTD that monitors the system is located
at Sheep Creek, WY. Under current UP operating practices, the coal
trains running in this service are classified as extended haul trains
and operate intact up to 1,500 miles between brake tests required under
49 CFR part 232. The waiver requested would extend the distance between
required tests up to an additional potential 1,100 miles, bypassing
approximately one visual inspection. Each test train will receive a
Class 1 brake test in accordance with 49 CFR 232.205 and a predeparture
inspection in accordance with 49 CFR 215.13 at North Platte, NE. The
trains will then leave North Platte and travel to a coal loading
facility in the Powder River Basin. The train cars will be loaded with
coal and then return to North Platte, passing the WTD monitors at Sheep
Creek for recording of braking performance, continuing through North
Platte through Van Buren, AR, and then to an unloading facility in
White Bluff. The train cars will be unloaded in White Bluff, and then
the train will return to the terminus at North Platte via Van Buren.
In its petition, AAR states preliminary tests conducted with the
WTD system indicate that the system identifies cars with ineffective
brakes at a significantly higher rate (about four times more) than
Intermediate Brake Tests. This is because the WTD system detects cars
with ineffective brakes, even though they might still meet the criteria
of a Class 1 or Intermediate Brake Test. Identification of such cars by
the WTD system will result in those cars being repaired earlier, with
the eventual result that a greater percentage of cars in any train
would have effective brakes. AAR expects this will result in improved
train safety.
Finally, AAR also requests an exemption from the statutory
requirements at 49 U.S.C. 20303, which mandate that a rail vehicle with
defective or insecure equipment may be moved to make repairs only to
the nearest available place at which the repairs can be made. In
requesting this exemption, AAR invokes the process at 49 U.S.C. 20306,
which states that the U.S. Secretary of Transportation may provide such
an exemption when existing requirements preclude the development or
implementation of more efficient railroad transportation equipment or
other transportation innovations under existing law. As delineated in
the SAP, the WTD system is a superior method to manage brake health as
compared with the current process found in the Federal brake system
safety standards. AAR requests a hearing during which evidence can be
developed per 49 U.S.C. 20306 for a statutory exemption to 49 U.S.C.
20303.
A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA will in the future
schedule a public hearing in connection with these proceedings as
requested by AAR pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 20306. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by May 5, 2016 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
[[Page 15147]]
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
See also https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacy. Notice for the privacy
notice of regulations.gov.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-06213 Filed 3-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P