Safety Zone; Richland Regatta, Columbia River, Richland, WA, 14998-15000 [2016-05880]
Download as PDF
14998
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0162]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Richland Regatta,
Columbia River, Richland, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone for certain waters
of the Columbia River in the vicinity of
Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA,
between River Miles 337 and 338,
during a hydroplane boat race from June
3, 2016, through June 5, 2016. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on the navigable waters
during the event. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Columbia River or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0162 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ken
Lawrenson, Waterways Management
Division, MSU Portland, OR, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 503–240–9319, email
msupdxwwm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On December 21, 2015, the Northwest
Power Boat Association notified the
Coast Guard that it will be conducting
a hydroplane boat race from 7 a.m. to 7
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Mar 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
p.m. daily from June 3, 2016, through
June 5, 2016, as part of the Richland
Regatta. The race will be held in the
vicinity of Howard Amon Park,
Richland, WA, and poses significant
dangers to the maritime public
including excessive noise, vessels racing
at high speeds in proximity to other
vessels, and flying debris in the event of
an accident. The Captain of the Port
Sector Columbia River (COTP) has
determined these potential hazards
would be a safety concern for maritime
traffic.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters before, during and
after daily scheduled races. The Coast
Guard proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to enforce a
safety zone from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily
from June 3, 2016, through June 5, 2016.
The safety zone would include all
navigable waters of the Columbia River
on all navigable waters of the Columbia
River between River Miles 337 and 338
in the vicinity of oward Amon Park,
Richland, WA. The duration of the zone
is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled
event. No vessel or person would be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the following factors. The
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
safety zone will only be effective for 12
hours daily over a 3 day period, and
while non-participant vessels will be
unable to enter, trainsit through, anchor
in, or remain within the event area
without authorization from the Captain
of the Port Sector Columbia River or a
designated representative, they may
operate in the surrounding areas during
the enforcement period. Additionally,
non-participant vessels may still enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the event area during the
enforcement period if authorized by the
COTP Sector Columbia River or a
designated representative. Moreover, the
Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Mar 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone that would be
enforced from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily
from June 3, 2016, through June 5, 2016.
The safety zone would cover navigable
waters of the Columbia River between
River Miles 337 and 338 in the vicinity
of oward Amon Park, Richland, WA.
Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14999
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–0162 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0162 Safety Zone; Richland
Regatta, Columbia River, Richland, WA.
(a) Regulated area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone. The
safety zone will include all navigable
waters of the Columbia River in the
vicinity of Howard Amon Park,
Richland, WA, between River Miles 337
and 338.
(b) Definitions. (1) The term
‘‘designated representative’’ means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port Sector
Columbia River in the enforcement of
the regulated area.
(2) The term ‘‘Non-participant persons
and vessels’’ means a vessel or person
not participating in the event as a
participant, spectator, or event attendee.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in subpart C of
this part, non-participant persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by Captain of the Port
Sector Columbia River or a designated
representative.
(2) Non-participant persons and
vessels may request authorization to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area by
contacting the Captain of the Port Sector
Columbia River or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel
16. If authorization is granted by the
Captain of the Port Sector Columbia
River or a designated representative, all
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
15000
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Sector Columbia River or a designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This safety
zone as described in paragraph (a) of
this section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
to 7 p.m. each day from June 3, 2016,
through June 5, 2016.
Dated: March 4, 2016.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2016–05880 Filed 3–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0138]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Cocos Lagoon, Merizo,
GU
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone for Coco’s
Crossing swim event in the waters of
Coco’s Lagoon, Guam. This event is
scheduled to take place from 6 a.m. to
1 p.m. on May 29, 2015. This safety
zone is necessary to protect all persons
and vessels participating in this marine
event from potential safety hazards
associated with vessel traffic in the area.
Race participants, chase boats and
organizers of the event will be exempt
from the safety zone. Entry of persons or
vessels into this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP). We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0138 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Chief Kristina
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Mar 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Gauthier, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Guam
at (671) 355–4866, email
Kristina.M.Gauthier@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On February 16, 2016, the Coast
Guard was notified of the intent of the
Manukai Athletic Club and The
Manhoben Swim Club to hold the
Coco’s Crossing swimming race on May
29, 2016 from 6 a.m. to 1 p.m. in
Merizo. The race will be from the
Merizo pier to Coco’s Island and back.
This safety zone is necessary to protect
all persons and vessels participating in
this marine event from potential safety
hazards associated with vessel traffic in
the area. The Captain of the Port Guam
has determined that potential hazards
associated with vessels in the area
would be a safety concern for
participants; therefore, a 100-yard
radius is established around all
participants.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of race participants in
the navigable waters within a 100-yard
radius before, during, and after the
scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 6 a.m. to 1 p.m. on May
29, 2016. The safety zone would cover
all navigable waters within a 100-yard
radius of race participants in Merizo
and Coco’s Lagoon. The duration of the
zone is intended to ensure the safety of
participants before, during, and after the
scheduled 6 a.m. to 1 p.m. race. No
vessel or person would be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. Race
participants, chase boats and organizers
of the event are exempt from the safety
zone. The regulatory text we are
proposing appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the Merizo and Coco’s Lagoon for 7
hours in the morning when vessel traffic
in the area is low and mainly constitutes
excursions to Coco’s Island. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the zone,
and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14998-15000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05880]
[[Page 14998]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0162]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Richland Regatta, Columbia River, Richland, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone for
certain waters of the Columbia River in the vicinity of Howard Amon
Park, Richland, WA, between River Miles 337 and 338, during a
hydroplane boat race from June 3, 2016, through June 5, 2016. This
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on the navigable
waters during the event. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a designated
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0162 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ken Lawrenson, Waterways
Management Division, MSU Portland, OR, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-
240-9319, email msupdxwwm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On December 21, 2015, the Northwest Power Boat Association notified
the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a hydroplane boat race from
7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily from June 3, 2016, through June 5, 2016, as part
of the Richland Regatta. The race will be held in the vicinity of
Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA, and poses significant dangers to the
maritime public including excessive noise, vessels racing at high
speeds in proximity to other vessels, and flying debris in the event of
an accident. The Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River (COTP) has
determined these potential hazards would be a safety concern for
maritime traffic.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters before, during and after daily scheduled
races. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to enforce a safety zone from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
daily from June 3, 2016, through June 5, 2016. The safety zone would
include all navigable waters of the Columbia River on all navigable
waters of the Columbia River between River Miles 337 and 338 in the
vicinity of oward Amon Park, Richland, WA. The duration of the zone is
intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled event. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the following
factors. The safety zone will only be effective for 12 hours daily over
a 3 day period, and while non-participant vessels will be unable to
enter, trainsit through, anchor in, or remain within the event area
without authorization from the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia
River or a designated representative, they may operate in the
surrounding areas during the enforcement period. Additionally, non-
participant vessels may still enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the event area during the enforcement period if
authorized by the COTP Sector Columbia River or a designated
representative. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
[[Page 14999]]
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone that would be enforced from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily from June 3,
2016, through June 5, 2016. The safety zone would cover navigable
waters of the Columbia River between River Miles 337 and 338 in the
vicinity of oward Amon Park, Richland, WA. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0162 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0162 Safety Zone; Richland Regatta, Columbia River,
Richland, WA.
(a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a safety zone.
The safety zone will include all navigable waters of the Columbia River
in the vicinity of Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA, between River Miles
337 and 338.
(b) Definitions. (1) The term ``designated representative'' means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River in the enforcement of the
regulated area.
(2) The term ``Non-participant persons and vessels'' means a vessel
or person not participating in the event as a participant, spectator,
or event attendee.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
subpart C of this part, non-participant persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by Captain of the
Port Sector Columbia River or a designated representative.
(2) Non-participant persons and vessels may request authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated
area by contacting the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a
designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization
is granted by the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a
designated representative, all
[[Page 15000]]
persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This safety zone as described in paragraph
(a) of this section will be enforced from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. each day
from June 3, 2016, through June 5, 2016.
Dated: March 4, 2016.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2016-05880 Filed 3-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P