Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Extending the Deadline for Implementing Rule 6.61(a)(2) and (3), 14912-14914 [2016-06097]
Download as PDF
14912
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to
become CBOE market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Other
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
II. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed
Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 12 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2016–018 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2016–018. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2016–018, and should be submitted on
or before April 8, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–06092 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77357; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Extending the Deadline
for Implementing Rule 6.61(a)(2) and
(3)
March 14, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March 4,
2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
11 15
12 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Mar 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the
deadline for implementing Rule
6.61(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016.
The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to extend
the deadline for implementing Rule
6.61(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016.
The current implementation deadline is
March 4, 2016.
In March 2015, the Commission
approved Rule 6.61, which provides a
price protection risk mechanism for
Market Maker quotes.4 Rule 6.61
provides two layers of price protection
to incoming Market Maker quotes,
rejecting those Market Maker quotes that
exceed certain parameters, as a risk
mitigation tool.5 The Exchange has
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74441
(March 4, 2015), 80 FR 12664 (March 10, 2015) (SR–
NYSEArca–2014–150) (Approval Order); see also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74018 (January
8, 2015), 80 FR 1982 (January 14, 2015) (SR–
NYSEArca–2014–150) (Notice).
5 The first layer of price protection assesses
incoming sell quotes against the NBB and incoming
buy quotes against the NBO (the ‘‘NBBO Price
Reasonability Check’’). Specifically, per Rule
6.61(a)(1), provided that an NBBO is available, a
Market Maker quote would be rejected if it is priced
a specified dollar amount or percentage through the
contra-side NBBO. The second layer of price
protection assesses the price of call or put bids
against a specified benchmark (the ‘‘Underlying
Stock Price/Strike Price Check’’), per Rule 6.61(a)(2)
and (3). This second layer of protection applies to
bids in call options or put options when (1) there
is no NBBO available, for example, during pre-
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
implemented the first layer of price
protection (the NBBO Reasonability
Check) and has until one year from the
date of the Approval Order to
implement the second layer of
protection (the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check) pursuant to
Commentary .01 to Rule 6.61, which is
March 4, 2016 (the ‘‘March 4th
Deadline’’).6
Because the Exchange has not yet
implemented the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check, the Exchange
proposes to modify Commentary .01 to
Rule 6.61 to extend the March 4th
Deadline to implement Rule 6.61(a)(2)
and (3) until July 31, 2016. The
Exchange has finalized the technology
related to this aspect of the Rule and
will be filing with the Commission a
separate proposed rule change to modify
the Rule as it relates to the Underlying
Stock Price/Strike Price Check. The
Exchange believes the proposed
extension would provide the Exchange
with sufficient time to review the
proposed modifications with the
Commission prior to implementing the
rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
because the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check is an approved rule
of the Exchange, providing the
Exchange with additional time to
implement the Rule would ensure that
Market Makers and investors are
afforded the opportunity to benefit from
this price protection feature once it is
implemented.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,7
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5),8 in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes
the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and
removes impediments to, and perfects
the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system
because an extension of the March 4th
Deadline would enable the Exchange to
opening or prior to conducting a re-opening after a
trading halt, or (2) if the NBBO is so wide as to not
reflect an appropriate price for the respective
options series.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75156
(June 11, 2015), 80 FR 34756 (June 17, 2015) (SR–
NYSEArca–2015–45).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Mar 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
implement the finalized technology
related to the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check. Moreover, the
proposed extension would assist with
the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market and protect investors and the
public interest because it would afford
the Exchange additional time to file, and
review, with the Commission a
proposed modification of the Rule as it
relates to the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check prior to
implementing the rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
because the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check is an approved rule
of the Exchange, providing the
Exchange with additional time to
implement the Rule would ensure that
Market Makers and investors are
afforded the opportunity to benefit from
this price protection feature once it is
implemented—even if in modified form.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not designed to
address any competitive issues, but
rather, to extend the deadline for
implementing the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check pending
finalization of the technology associated
with that feature.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.10
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
10 17
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14913
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 11 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),12 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The
Commission believes that waiving the
30-day operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest as it will allow the
Exchange to immediately extend the
implementation deadline for the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check without delay and provide the
Exchange additional time to implement
the technology associated with such
price protection. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay requirement and
designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.13
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–41 on the subject
line.
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Commission
has waived this requirement in this case.
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
14914
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2016–41. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2016–41, and should be
submitted on or before April 8, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–06097 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–77361; File No. SR–ICC–
2016–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change To Provide for
the Clearance of Certain Asia-Pacific
Credit Default Swap Contracts
March 14, 2016.
I. Introduction
On January 27, 2016, ICE Clear Credit
LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change
(SR–ICC–2016–002) to provide the basis
for ICC to clear certain Asia-Pacific
credit default swap (‘‘CDS’’) contracts.
On January 29, 2016, ICC filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.3 The
proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on February 12, 2016.4 The
Commission did not receive comments
on the proposed rule change. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission is approving the proposed
rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to adopt new rules that will
provide the basis for ICC to clear certain
Asia-Pacific CDS contracts. Specifically,
ICC has proposed to amend Chapter 26
of the ICC Rulebook (‘‘ICC Rules’’) to
add Subchapters 26J and 26L to provide
for the clearance of iTraxx Asia/Pacific
CDS contracts (‘‘iTraxx Asia/Pacific
Contracts’’) and Standard Asia/Pacific
Sovereign CDS contracts (‘‘SAS
Contracts’’, collectively with iTraxx
Asia/Pacific Contracts ‘‘Asia-Pacific
CDS Contracts’’). The SAS Contracts
will reference the Commonwealth of
Australia, the Malaysian Federation, the
People’s Republic of China, the
Republic of Indonesia, the Republic of
Korea and the Republic of the
Philippines.
Additionally, ICC has proposed to
amend the ICC End-of-Day Price
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, ICC deleted a factual error
in the originally filed proposal that stated that no
changes would be made to ICC’s Risk Management
Framework. Amendment No. 1 amended and
replaced the original filing in its entirety.
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–77079
(February 8, 2016), 81 FR 7613 (February 12, 2016)
(SR–ICC–2016–002).
2 17
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:50 Mar 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Discovery Policies and Procedures to
add two additional pricing windows to
accommodate the submission of end-ofday prices relating to such Asia-Pacific
CDS Contracts. Finally, ICC has
proposed to amend the ICC Risk
Management Framework to include the
risk horizon utilized for instruments
traded during Asia-Pacific hours and to
amend the ICC Risk Management Model
Description document to add AsiaPacific to the list of regions to be
considered in General Wrong Way Risk
calculations.
ICC has represented that the iTraxx
Asia/Pacific Contracts have similar
terms to the CDX North American IG/
HY/XO CDS contracts (‘‘CDX NA
Contracts’’) currently cleared by ICC and
governed by Subchapter 26A of the ICC
Rules, the CDX Emerging Markets CDS
contracts (‘‘CDX EM Contracts’’)
currently cleared by ICC and governed
by Subchapter 26C of the ICC Rules, and
the iTraxx Europe CDS contracts
(‘‘iTraxx Europe Contracts’’) currently
cleared by ICC and governed by
Subchapter 26F of the ICC Rules. ICC
asserts that the proposed rules found in
Subchapter 26J largely mirror the ICC
Rules for CDX NA Contracts in
Subchapter 26A, CDX EM Contracts in
Subchapter 26C, and iTraxx Europe
Contracts in Subchapter 26F, with
certain modifications that reflect
differences in terms and market
conventions between those contracts
and iTraxx Asia/Pacific Contracts.
Additionally, iTraxx Asia/Pacific
Contracts will be denominated in
United States Dollars.
ICC Rule 26J–102 (Definitions) will
set forth the definitions used for the
iTraxx Asia/Pacific Contracts. ICC has
represented that the definitions are
substantially the same as the definitions
found in Subchapters 26A, 26C, and 26F
of the ICC Rules, other than certain
conforming changes.
ICC Rules 26J–309 (Acceptance of
iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched
Contracts by ICE Clear Credit), 26J–315
(Terms of the Cleared iTraxx Asia/
Pacific Untranched Contract), 26J–316
(Updating Index Version of Fungible
Contracts After a Credit Event or a
Succession Event; Updating Relevant
Untranched Standard Terms
Supplement), and 26J–317 (Terms of
iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched
Contracts) will reflect or incorporate the
basic contract specifications for iTraxx
Asia/Pacific Contracts and, according to
ICC, are substantially the same as under
Subchapters 26A, 26C, and 26F of the
ICC Rules.
ICC has represented that SAS
Contracts have similar terms to the
Standard North American Corporate
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14912-14914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06097]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-77357; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2016-41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Extending the
Deadline for Implementing Rule 6.61(a)(2) and (3)
March 14, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on March 4, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the deadline for implementing Rule
6.61(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to extend the deadline for implementing
Rule 6.61(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016. The current implementation
deadline is March 4, 2016.
In March 2015, the Commission approved Rule 6.61, which provides a
price protection risk mechanism for Market Maker quotes.\4\ Rule 6.61
provides two layers of price protection to incoming Market Maker
quotes, rejecting those Market Maker quotes that exceed certain
parameters, as a risk mitigation tool.\5\ The Exchange has
[[Page 14913]]
implemented the first layer of price protection (the NBBO Reasonability
Check) and has until one year from the date of the Approval Order to
implement the second layer of protection (the Underlying Stock Price/
Strike Price Check) pursuant to Commentary .01 to Rule 6.61, which is
March 4, 2016 (the ``March 4th Deadline'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74441 (March 4,
2015), 80 FR 12664 (March 10, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2014-150) (Approval
Order); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74018 (January
8, 2015), 80 FR 1982 (January 14, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2014-150)
(Notice).
\5\ The first layer of price protection assesses incoming sell
quotes against the NBB and incoming buy quotes against the NBO (the
``NBBO Price Reasonability Check''). Specifically, per Rule
6.61(a)(1), provided that an NBBO is available, a Market Maker quote
would be rejected if it is priced a specified dollar amount or
percentage through the contra-side NBBO. The second layer of price
protection assesses the price of call or put bids against a
specified benchmark (the ``Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check''), per Rule 6.61(a)(2) and (3). This second layer of
protection applies to bids in call options or put options when (1)
there is no NBBO available, for example, during pre-opening or prior
to conducting a re-opening after a trading halt, or (2) if the NBBO
is so wide as to not reflect an appropriate price for the respective
options series.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75156 (June 11,
2015), 80 FR 34756 (June 17, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-45).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the Exchange has not yet implemented the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check, the Exchange proposes to modify Commentary
.01 to Rule 6.61 to extend the March 4th Deadline to implement Rule
6.61(a)(2) and (3) until July 31, 2016. The Exchange has finalized the
technology related to this aspect of the Rule and will be filing with
the Commission a separate proposed rule change to modify the Rule as it
relates to the Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check. The Exchange
believes the proposed extension would provide the Exchange with
sufficient time to review the proposed modifications with the
Commission prior to implementing the rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that because the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check is an approved rule of the Exchange, providing
the Exchange with additional time to implement the Rule would ensure
that Market Makers and investors are afforded the opportunity to
benefit from this price protection feature once it is implemented.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\8\
in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and in general,
to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposal promotes just and
equitable principles of trade and removes impediments to, and perfects
the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system
because an extension of the March 4th Deadline would enable the
Exchange to implement the finalized technology related to the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check. Moreover, the proposed
extension would assist with the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market and protect investors and the public interest because it would
afford the Exchange additional time to file, and review, with the
Commission a proposed modification of the Rule as it relates to the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check prior to implementing the
rule, as modified.
Finally, the Exchange believes that because the Underlying Stock
Price/Strike Price Check is an approved rule of the Exchange, providing
the Exchange with additional time to implement the Rule would ensure
that Market Makers and investors are afforded the opportunity to
benefit from this price protection feature once it is implemented--even
if in modified form.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not designed to address any competitive issues, but rather, to extend
the deadline for implementing the Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price
Check pending finalization of the technology associated with that
feature.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Commission has waived this requirement in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\12\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest as it will allow the
Exchange to immediately extend the implementation deadline for the
Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check without delay and provide the
Exchange additional time to implement the technology associated with
such price protection. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the
30-day operative delay requirement and designates the proposed rule
change as operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2016-41 on the subject line.
[[Page 14914]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2016-41. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2016-41, and should
be submitted on or before April 8, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-06097 Filed 3-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P