Canadian Pacific Railway Limited-Petition for Expedited Declaratory Order, 14172-14173 [2016-05901]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 14172 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Notices how a child’s impairment-related symptoms affect his or her ability to function independently, appropriately, and effectively in an age-appropriate manner in each functional domain. If a child’s impairment functionally equals a listing, we find him or her disabled. If a child’s impairment does not functionally equal the listings, we find him or her not disabled. For a child with a title XVI disability claim, the sequential evaluation process ends at this step. If the individual’s impairment does not meet or equal a listing, we will assess and make a finding about an individual’s residual functional capacity based on all the relevant medical and other evidence in the individual’s case record. An individual’s residual functional capacity is the most the individual can still do despite his or her impairment-related limitations. We consider the individual’s symptoms when determining his or her residual functional capacity and the extent to which the individual’s impairmentrelated symptoms are consistent with the evidence in the record.25 After establishing the residual functional capacity, we determine whether an individual is able to do any past relevant work. At step 4, we compare the individual’s residual functional capacity with the requirements of his or her past relevant work. If the individual’s residual functional capacity is consistent with the demands of any of his or her past relevant work, either as the individual performed it or as the occupation is generally performed in the national economy, then we will find the individual not disabled. If none of the individual’s past relevant work is within his or her residual functional capacity, we proceed to step 5 of the sequential evaluation process. At step 5 of the sequential evaluation process, we determine whether the individual is able to adjust to other work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy. We consider the same residual functional capacity, together with the individual’s age, education, and past work experience. If the individual is able to adjust to other work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy, we will find him or her not disabled. If the individual cannot adjust to other work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy, we find him or her disabled. At step 5 of the sequential evaluation process, we will not consider an individual’s symptoms any further because we considered the individual’s 25 See 20 CFR 404.1545 and 416.945. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 symptoms when we determined the individual’s residual functional capacity. Effective Date: This SSR is effective on March 16, 2016. Cross-References: SSR 96–3p, ‘‘Titles II and XVI: Considering Allegations of Pain and Other Symptoms in Determining Whether a Medically Determinable Impairment is Severe,’’ SSR 96–8p, ‘‘Titles II and XVI: Assessing Residual Functional Capacity in Initial Claims,’’ SSR 96–6p, ‘‘Titles II and XVI: Consideration of Administrative Findings of Fact by State Agency Medical and Psychological Consultants and Other Program Physicians and Psychologists at the Administrative Law Judge and Appeals Council Levels of Administrative Review; Medical Equivalence;’’ and Program Operations Manual System, sections DI 24515.061 and DI 24515. 064. [FR Doc. 2016–05916 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191–02–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice: 9483] International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting; Notice Closed Meeting In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 10(a)(2), the Department of State announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) to take place on April 27, 2016 at the Department of State, Washington, DC. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, political-military affairs, international security, and related aspects of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will include classified discussions related to the Board’s studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding arms control, international security, nuclear proliferation, and diplomacy. For more information, contact Christopher Herrick, Acting Executive Director of the International Security Advisory Board, U.S. Department of PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 647–9683. Dated: February 22, 2016. Christopher Herrick, Acting Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. Department of State. [FR Doc. 2016–05927 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–35–P SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36004] Canadian Pacific Railway Limited— Petition for Expedited Declaratory Order On March 2, 2016, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CPRL) 1 filed a petition requesting that the Board issue a declaratory order on two issues pertaining to CPRL’s pursuit of a possible merger with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) whether: (1) ‘‘A structure in which CPRL holds its current rail carrier subsidiaries in an independent, irrevocable voting trust while it acquires control of [NSR] and seeks STB merger authority potentially could be used to avoid the exercise of unlawful premature common control’’; and (2) ‘‘it would be potentially permissible for the chief executive officer of [CPRC] to terminate his position at [CPRC] entities in trust and then to take the comparable position at [NSR] pending merger approval.’’ (Pet. 2.) CPRL has requested that the Board issue an expedited declaratory order by May 6, 2016. On March 7, 2016, the Transportation Communications Union/IAM (TCU/ IAM) requested that the Board provide interested parties 45 days to reply to the March 2 petition.2 Also on March 7, 2016, CSX Corporation requested that the Board deny the March 2 petition, or, should the Board proceed, issue a procedural schedule that would allow parties 30 days from publication to submit comments and 15 days for the simultaneous submission of reply comments. On March 9, 2016, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, and International 1 CPRL is a noncarrier, publicly traded holding company that wholly owns directly or indirectly rail carriers in Canada and the United States that do business as ‘‘CP’’ or ‘‘Canadian Pacific.’’ ‘‘CP’’ or ‘‘Canadian Pacific’’ refers to the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CPRC), the Canadian operating company and parent of the U.S. railroad operating subsidiaries Soo Line Railroad Company, Delaware and Hudson Railroad Company, and Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad Corporation. 2 On March 7, 2016, CPRL filed a reply requesting that the Board deny TCU/IAM’s extension request. E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Notices Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers/Mechanical Division jointly submitted a reply requesting until April 1, 2016, to reply to the March 2 petition and that no replies to replies be permitted. By comment filed on March 9, 2016, the Transportation Division of the Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers Union joined in TCU/IAM’s request for at least 45 days to reply to the March 2 petition. Replies will be due by April 8, 2016, and should address the merits of CPRL’s petition. CPRL will be permitted to file a rebuttal by April 13, 2016. Under the circumstances, this schedule will provide a sufficient opportunity for interested persons to present their views on the issues raised and for CPRL to respond. It is ordered: 1. Substantive replies to CPRL’s petition are due by April 8, 2016. 2. CPRL’s rebuttal is due by April 13, 2016. 3. Notice of this action will be published in the Federal Register. 4. This decision is effective on its service date. Decided: March 10, 2016. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. Kenyatta Clay, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2016–05901 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Thirteenth Meeting: RTCA Tactical Operations Committee (TOC) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of Thirteenth RTCA Tactical Operations Committee (TOC) meeting. AGENCY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the Thirteenth RTCA Tactical Operations Committee (TOC) meeting. DATES: The meeting will be held April 4, 2016 from 2:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel: (202) 330–0662. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202) 833–9434, or Web site at https:// mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 www.rtca.org or Trin Mitra, TOC Secretary, RTCA, Inc., tmitra@rtca.org, (202) 330–0655. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Tactical Operations Committee (TOC). The agenda will include the following: Monday, April 4, 2016 1. Opening of Meeting/Introduction of TOC Members—Co Chairs Dale Wright and Bryan Quigley 2. Official Statement of Designated Federal Official—Elizabeth Ray 3. Approval of March 3, 2016 Meeting Summary 4. FAA Update—Elizabeth Ray 5. Discussion on NATCA agreement on facility release policy 6. Recommendations to Consider for Approval from the Western Regional Task Group/NorCal feasibility study 7. Review Terms of Reference for PBN Route Structure Concept of Operations task 8. Other Business 9. Adjourn Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be provided upon request. Persons who wish to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 10, 2016. Latasha Robinson, Management & Program Analyst, NextGen, Enterprise Support Services Division, Federal Aviation Administration. [FR Doc. 2016–05937 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Notice of Availability of the FAA’s Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for NASA’s Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment for the Antares 200 Configuration Expendable Launch Vehicle at Wallops Flight Facility (SEA) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ACTIONS: 14173 Notice of availability of the FONSI. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA; 42 United States Code 4321 et seq.), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E, Change 1, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, the FAA is announcing the availability of the FAA’s FONSI for the SEA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Douglas W. Graham, Office of Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW., Suite 325, Washington, DC 20591; email Doug.Graham@faa.gov; telephone (202) 267–8568. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SEA was prepared by NASA to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the FAA modifying Orbital ATK’s Launch Operator License to include launches of the modified Antares 200 medium lift launch vehicle from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. NASA issued a FONSI on August 29, 2015. Based on its independent review and consideration of the SEA, the FAA concurs with the analysis of impacts and findings in the SEA and formally adopts the SEA in its entirety. After reviewing and analyzing available data and information on existing conditions and potential impacts, including the SEA, the FAA has determined that its Proposed Action of modifying Orbital ATK’s launch license to conduct 200 Configuration Antares launch operations at MARS Pad 0–A would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of NEPA. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not required, and the FAA is issuing this FONSI. The FAA made this determination in accordance with applicable environmental laws and FAA regulations. The FAA has posted the FONSI on the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation Web site: https:// www.faa.gov/about/office_org/ headquarters_offices/ast/ environmental/nepa_docs/review/ operator/. A copy of the SEA may be found at: https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/ Antares_FSEA.html. A copy of the Biological Opinon issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service regarding this action may be found at: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/ headquarters_offices/ast/ SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1

Agencies

Surface Transportation Board

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14172-14173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05901]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. FD 36004]


Canadian Pacific Railway Limited--Petition for Expedited 
Declaratory Order

    On March 2, 2016, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CPRL) \1\ filed 
a petition requesting that the Board issue a declaratory order on two 
issues pertaining to CPRL's pursuit of a possible merger with Norfolk 
Southern Railway Company (NSR) whether: (1) ``A structure in which CPRL 
holds its current rail carrier subsidiaries in an independent, 
irrevocable voting trust while it acquires control of [NSR] and seeks 
STB merger authority potentially could be used to avoid the exercise of 
unlawful premature common control''; and (2) ``it would be potentially 
permissible for the chief executive officer of [CPRC] to terminate his 
position at [CPRC] entities in trust and then to take the comparable 
position at [NSR] pending merger approval.'' (Pet. 2.) CPRL has 
requested that the Board issue an expedited declaratory order by May 6, 
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CPRL is a noncarrier, publicly traded holding company that 
wholly owns directly or indirectly rail carriers in Canada and the 
United States that do business as ``CP'' or ``Canadian Pacific.'' 
``CP'' or ``Canadian Pacific'' refers to the Canadian Pacific 
Railway Company (CPRC), the Canadian operating company and parent of 
the U.S. railroad operating subsidiaries Soo Line Railroad Company, 
Delaware and Hudson Railroad Company, and Dakota, Minnesota and 
Eastern Railroad Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 7, 2016, the Transportation Communications Union/IAM (TCU/
IAM) requested that the Board provide interested parties 45 days to 
reply to the March 2 petition.\2\ Also on March 7, 2016, CSX 
Corporation requested that the Board deny the March 2 petition, or, 
should the Board proceed, issue a procedural schedule that would allow 
parties 30 days from publication to submit comments and 15 days for the 
simultaneous submission of reply comments. On March 9, 2016, the 
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of 
Railroad Signalmen, and International

[[Page 14173]]

Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers/
Mechanical Division jointly submitted a reply requesting until April 1, 
2016, to reply to the March 2 petition and that no replies to replies 
be permitted. By comment filed on March 9, 2016, the Transportation 
Division of the Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers Union 
joined in TCU/IAM's request for at least 45 days to reply to the March 
2 petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ On March 7, 2016, CPRL filed a reply requesting that the 
Board deny TCU/IAM's extension request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Replies will be due by April 8, 2016, and should address the merits 
of CPRL's petition. CPRL will be permitted to file a rebuttal by April 
13, 2016. Under the circumstances, this schedule will provide a 
sufficient opportunity for interested persons to present their views on 
the issues raised and for CPRL to respond.
    It is ordered:
    1. Substantive replies to CPRL's petition are due by April 8, 2016.
    2. CPRL's rebuttal is due by April 13, 2016.
    3. Notice of this action will be published in the Federal Register.
    4. This decision is effective on its service date.

    Decided: March 10, 2016.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2016-05901 Filed 3-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.