Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Successful Approaches To Reduce Sodium in School Meals, 14081-14084 [2016-05895]
Download as PDF
14081
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Notices
Americans and food guidance system.
Research supports the use of both
incentives and the recognition of good
work to promote positive behavior and
performance. Therefore, the foundation
of the HealthierUS School Challenge:
Smarter Lunchrooms (HUSSC: SL)
initiative is based on four levels of
excellence in nutrition and physical
activity. Team Nutrition schools that
voluntarily submit applications for one
of HUSSC: SL’s four levels of
excellence, and meet the HUSSC: SL
criteria, receive an award plaque,
banner, monetary incentive, and
national and community recognition of
their accomplishments.
This information collection will
inform how the Food and Nutrition
Service develops policy and technical
assistance regarding the school nutrition
environment. Collective feedback from
the schools submitting application
forms will inform FNS on what is
actually being implemented at the local
level. An assessment of the information
obtained from schools will help FNS to
better target efforts to design sciencebased nutrient standards for school
meals, develop training and nutrition
education materials in support of
Federal child nutrition programs, plan
for program enhancements, and share
descriptive information about best
practices with other schools across the
country; and will assist those schools in
planning and implementing their own
feasible, results-oriented practices.
Ultimately, the information on the
application forms will help FNS better
meet the needs of its customers,
strengthen the development of policy
directed toward the administration’s
interest in eliminating childhood
obesity and food insecurity, and
enhance the health and nutritional
status of the US population.
This application is currently
approved under OMB Control No. 0584–
0524 Generic Clearance to Conduct
Formative Research (which expires June
30, 2016). FNS is now seeking approval
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent
for this application in its own
information collection.
Affected Public: State, Local, and
Tribal Government. Respondent groups
identified include school and school
district representatives.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
FNS anticipates that 1,000 school or
school district representatives will
voluntarily submit HealthierUS School
Challenge: Smarter Lunchrooms
applications over a one year period (see
chart).
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: The school or district
representative will be asked to
participate in completing one
application form.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
1,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 2
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,000 hours.
See the table below for estimated total
annual burden for the respondents.
Estimated
average
number
of hours per
response
Total annual
responses
(Col. bxc)
Estimated total
hours
(Col. dxe)
Reporting Burden
School or School District Representative ............................
1,000
1
1,000
2
2,000
Total Reporting Burden ................................................
1,000
........................
1,000
........................
2,000
Dated: March 8, 2016.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05893 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Successful
Approaches To Reduce Sodium in
School Meals
Food and Nutrition Service,
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
AGENCY:
Notice and request for
comments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This collection is a new collection to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Mar 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
study Successful Approaches to Reduce
Sodium in School Meals.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 16, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on
the following topics: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were
used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques, and/or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to Alice Ann
Gola, Social Science Research Analyst,
Special Nutrition Evaluation Branch,
Office of Policy Support, USDA Food
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA
22302. Comments may also be
submitted via email to AliceAnn.Gola@
fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Alice Ann Gola at
AliceAnn.Gola@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Successful Approaches to
Reduce Sodium in School Meals.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) and the School
Breakfast Program (SBP) are federally
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
14082
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
assisted meal programs operating in
almost 100,000 public schools, nonprofit private schools, and residential
child-care institutions. Any child
enrolled in a participating school may
purchase a meal through the SBP and
NSLP. Children from families with
incomes at or below 130 percent of the
poverty level are eligible for free meals.
Children from families with incomes
between 130 percent and 185 percent of
poverty are eligible for reduced-price
meals. School districts that participate
in NSLP receive cash subsidies and
commodities (USDA foods) from the
USDA for each meal they serve. In
return, they must serve meals that meet
Federal requirements.
Federal regulations (7 CFR part
210.10) set nutritional and other meal
requirements for school lunches,
including targets for sodium levels. The
purpose of this study is to identify,
among schools that are successfully
meeting the sodium targets, ‘‘best
practices’’ that could be used to provide
technical assistance to School Food
Authorities (SFAs) for developing lower
sodium menus. This study relies on
qualitative data from four sources: SFA
directors, school administrators,
community-based stakeholders, and
local food suppliers to SFAs. The study
activities subject to this notice include
online prescreening surveys, brief
telephone interviews, in-depth
telephone interviews, and in-depth onsite interviews. The online prescreening
survey will verify which SFAs are
currently meeting sodium targets. The
brief site visit selection telephone
interview will provide additional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Mar 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
information used to determine which of
the eligible sites will experience indepth interviews, either on-site or by
telephone.
Affected Public: This study includes
four respondent groups: (1) State, Local,
and Tribal Government (SFA directors
and school administrators), (2) Business
or Other For-Profit (local food
suppliers), (3) Individuals or
Households (community-based
stakeholders), and (4) Not-For-Profit
Institutions (community-based
stakeholders).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The total estimated number of
respondents is 753. This figure includes
608 respondents and 145 nonrespondents. The initial sample will
consist of 625 SFA directors. Assuming
that 80 percent respond to the prescreening survey, the resulting
respondent sample will include
approximately 500 SFA directors. Of the
SFA directors identified as eligible from
the pre-screening survey results, 45 will
be contacted with an expected response
rate of 80 percent (36 SFA director
respondents and 9 non-respondents). Indepth interviews will be conducted
with the 36 SFA directors (with an
expected 100 percent response rate).
The following respondent types will be
recruited within each of the SFAs,
resulting in 36 responses per respondent
type: 40 school administrators (with an
expected response rate of 90 percent);
46 local food suppliers (with an
expected response rate of 78 percent);
and 42 community-based stakeholders
(32 individuals with an expected
response rate of 87.5 percent and 10 not-
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for-profit institutions with an expected
response rate of 80 percent). The 145
non-respondents include 125 SFA
directors, 4 school administrators, 10
local food suppliers, 4 individual
community-based stakeholders, and 2
not-for-profit community-based
stakeholders.
Estimated Frequency of Responses per
Respondent: FNS estimates that the
frequency of responses per respondent
will average 1.11 responses per
respondent across the entire collection.
SFA directors may provide responses on
three occasions (prescreening survey,
brief site visit selection telephone
interview, and in-depth interview),
although most will provide responses
on the prescreening survey only. School
administrators, community-based
stakeholders, and local food suppliers to
SFAs will be expected to provide a onetime response during the in-depth
interview.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
The total number of responses expected
across all respondent categories is 834.
Estimated Time per Response: The
estimated time will vary depending on
the respondent category and will range
from three minutes (0.05 hours) to one
hour. The table that follows outlines the
estimated total annual burden for each
type of respondent. Across all study
respondents and non-respondents, the
average estimated time per response is
0.47 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours on Respondents: 391.22 hours
(see table below for estimated total
annual burden hours by type of
respondent).
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
I
Respondent
type
I
Instrument
I
Total
Sample
Size
I
Estimated
Number of
Respondentsb
I
Frequency
of
Response
Total
Annual
Responses
Average
Time Per
Response
(Hours)'
Total
Annual
Burden
Estimate
(Hours)
Estimated
Number of
NonRespondentse
Frequency
of NonResponse
Total
Annual
NonResponses
Average
Time Per
NonResponse
(Hours)'
Total
Annual
Burden
Estimate
(Hours)
Grand
Total
Burden
Estimate
(Hours)
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
State, Local, and
Tnbal Government
SFA Director
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
•A welcome email with the prescreening survey l1nk will be sent the first week of recruitment Two more reminder em ails will be sent; one dunng the second and third weeks. Four reminder phone calls will be made; two
each week during the second and third weeks.
b500 SFA directors are estimated to participate 1n the pre-screen1ng survey; 45 of those 500 will be asked to participate 1n the brief telephone interview; 36 of those 45 are expected to respond and the same 36 are
expected to part1c1pate 1n the In-depth 1nterv1ew
'The burden hours reftect the data collection activity of an average 20 min. survey as well as an average correspondence burden of 08 (maximum of three welcome/reminder emails at 3 min. and four reminder phone
calls at 1 2 m1n)
'The burden hours reftect the burden associated with non-response to repeated correspondence of 26 hours (three welcome/reminder emails at 3 min and four phone calls at 12 min)
•These estimated 9 non-respondents are not unique non-respondents Therefore, they are not included in the total count of non-respondents
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Notices
18:11 Mar 15, 2016
Affected Public
14083
EN16MR16.012
14084
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Notices
Dated: March 7, 2016.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05895 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Information Collection Activity;
Comment Request
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended), the
Rural Utilities Service (RUS) invites
comments on this information
collection for which RUS intends to
request approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by May 16, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas P. Dickson, Acting Director,
Program Development & Regulatory
Analysis, Rural Utilities Service, USDA,
1400 Independence Ave. SW., STOP
1522, Room 5164 South Building,
Washington, DC 20250–1522.
Telephone: (202) 690–4492. FAX: (202)
720–4120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Seismic Safety of New Building
Construction.
OMB Control Number: 0572–0099.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: The Earthquake Hazards
Reduction Act of 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7701
et seq.) was enacted to reduce risks to
life and property through the National
Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
(NEHRP). The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is
designated as the agency with the
primary responsibility to plan and
coordinate the NEHRP. This program
includes the development and
implementation of feasible design and
construction methods to make
structures earthquake resistant.
Executive Order 12699 of January 5,
1990, Seismic Safety of Federal and
Federally Assisted or Regulated New
Building Construction, requires that
measures to assure seismic safety be
imposed on federally assisted new
building construction.
Title 7 Part 1792, Subpart C, Seismic
Safety of Federally assisted New
Building Construction, identifies
acceptable seismic standards which
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Mar 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
must be employed in new building
construction funded by loans, grants, or
guarantees made by RUS or the Rural
Telephone Bank (RTB) or through lien
accommodations or subordinations
approved by RUS or RTB. This subpart
implements and explains the provisions
of the loan contract utilized by the RUS
for both electric and
telecommunications borrowers and by
the RTB for its telecommunications
borrowers requiring construction
certifications affirming compliance with
the standards.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average .75 hours per
response.
Respondents: Small business or
organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
192.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 144.
Comments are invited on (a) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumption used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques on
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Thomas P.
Dickson, Acting Director, Program
Development and Regulatory Analysis,
USDA Rural Utilities Service, STOP
1522, 1400 Independence Ave. SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–1522. FAX:
(202) 720–8435. Email:
Thomas.dickson@wdc.usda.gov.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from MaryPat Daskal,
Program Development and Regulatory
Analysis, at (202) 720–7853. FAX: (202)
720–8435. Email: marypat.daskal@
wdc.usda.gov. All responses to this
notice will be summarized and included
in the request for OMB approval. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
Dated: March 9, 2016.
Brandon McBride,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05925 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Notice of Solicitation of Applications
(NOSA); Correction
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) published in the Federal
Register, on March 9, 2016 a Notice of
Solicitation of Applications (NOSA),
announcing the Household Water Well
System Grant Program application
window for fiscal year (FY) 2016.
Inadvertently, an incorrect web link was
included in the NOSA that did not
permit access to the intended Web site.
This document removes the incorrect
web reference and replaces it with the
correct version.
DATES: Effective on March 16, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Derek Jones, Community Programs
Specialist, Water and Environmental
Programs, Rural Utilities Service, Rural
Development, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, STOP 1570, Room 2234–S,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–1570,
Telephone: (202) 720–9640, fax: (202)
690–0649, email: derek.jones@
wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Rural
Utilities Service (RUS) published in the
Federal Register on March 9, 2016, at 81
FR 12451, a Notice of Solicitation of
Applications (NOSA), for its Household
Water Well System Grant Program
application window for fiscal year (FY)
2016. Inadvertently, an incorrect web
link was included in the NOSA that did
not permit access to the intended Web
site. This document removes all
references to the incorrect web link
published on March 9, 2016 and
replaces it with the correct web
reference.
In the Notice of Solicitation of
Applications (NOSA) FR Doc. 2016–
05170 published on March 9, 2016, at
81 FR 12451, make the following
correction. Remove ‘‘rurdev.usda.gov/
UWP-individualwellsystems’’ and add in
its place ‘‘https://www.rd.usda.gov/
programs-services/household-waterwell-system-grants’’ on the following
pages:
Page 12451, second column,
ADDRESSES: 1. Electronic copies: Page
12453, second column, IV. Application
and Submission Information, A. Where
To Get Application Information, 1.
Internet for electronic copies; Page
12454, column one, (14) Assurances and
certifications of compliance with other
Federal Statutes; and, Page 12457,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14081-14084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--Successful Approaches To Reduce Sodium in School Meals
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This collection is a new
collection to study Successful Approaches to Reduce Sodium in School
Meals.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 16, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on the following topics: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques, and/or other forms of information
technology.
Comments may be sent to Alice Ann Gola, Social Science Research
Analyst, Special Nutrition Evaluation Branch, Office of Policy Support,
USDA Food and Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted via email to
AliceAnn.Gola@fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Alice Ann
Gola at AliceAnn.Gola@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Successful Approaches to Reduce Sodium in School Meals.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Number: Not yet assigned.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and the School
Breakfast Program (SBP) are federally
[[Page 14082]]
assisted meal programs operating in almost 100,000 public schools, non-
profit private schools, and residential child-care institutions. Any
child enrolled in a participating school may purchase a meal through
the SBP and NSLP. Children from families with incomes at or below 130
percent of the poverty level are eligible for free meals. Children from
families with incomes between 130 percent and 185 percent of poverty
are eligible for reduced-price meals. School districts that participate
in NSLP receive cash subsidies and commodities (USDA foods) from the
USDA for each meal they serve. In return, they must serve meals that
meet Federal requirements.
Federal regulations (7 CFR part 210.10) set nutritional and other
meal requirements for school lunches, including targets for sodium
levels. The purpose of this study is to identify, among schools that
are successfully meeting the sodium targets, ``best practices'' that
could be used to provide technical assistance to School Food
Authorities (SFAs) for developing lower sodium menus. This study relies
on qualitative data from four sources: SFA directors, school
administrators, community-based stakeholders, and local food suppliers
to SFAs. The study activities subject to this notice include online
prescreening surveys, brief telephone interviews, in-depth telephone
interviews, and in-depth on-site interviews. The online prescreening
survey will verify which SFAs are currently meeting sodium targets. The
brief site visit selection telephone interview will provide additional
information used to determine which of the eligible sites will
experience in-depth interviews, either on-site or by telephone.
Affected Public: This study includes four respondent groups: (1)
State, Local, and Tribal Government (SFA directors and school
administrators), (2) Business or Other For-Profit (local food
suppliers), (3) Individuals or Households (community-based
stakeholders), and (4) Not-For-Profit Institutions (community-based
stakeholders).
Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated number of
respondents is 753. This figure includes 608 respondents and 145 non-
respondents. The initial sample will consist of 625 SFA directors.
Assuming that 80 percent respond to the pre-screening survey, the
resulting respondent sample will include approximately 500 SFA
directors. Of the SFA directors identified as eligible from the pre-
screening survey results, 45 will be contacted with an expected
response rate of 80 percent (36 SFA director respondents and 9 non-
respondents). In-depth interviews will be conducted with the 36 SFA
directors (with an expected 100 percent response rate). The following
respondent types will be recruited within each of the SFAs, resulting
in 36 responses per respondent type: 40 school administrators (with an
expected response rate of 90 percent); 46 local food suppliers (with an
expected response rate of 78 percent); and 42 community-based
stakeholders (32 individuals with an expected response rate of 87.5
percent and 10 not-for-profit institutions with an expected response
rate of 80 percent). The 145 non-respondents include 125 SFA directors,
4 school administrators, 10 local food suppliers, 4 individual
community-based stakeholders, and 2 not-for-profit community-based
stakeholders.
Estimated Frequency of Responses per Respondent: FNS estimates that
the frequency of responses per respondent will average 1.11 responses
per respondent across the entire collection. SFA directors may provide
responses on three occasions (prescreening survey, brief site visit
selection telephone interview, and in-depth interview), although most
will provide responses on the prescreening survey only. School
administrators, community-based stakeholders, and local food suppliers
to SFAs will be expected to provide a one-time response during the in-
depth interview.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: The total number of responses
expected across all respondent categories is 834.
Estimated Time per Response: The estimated time will vary depending
on the respondent category and will range from three minutes (0.05
hours) to one hour. The table that follows outlines the estimated total
annual burden for each type of respondent. Across all study respondents
and non-respondents, the average estimated time per response is 0.47
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours on Respondents: 391.22 hours
(see table below for estimated total annual burden hours by type of
respondent).
[[Page 14083]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR16.012
[[Page 14084]]
Dated: March 7, 2016.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05895 Filed 3-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C