Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 29 Petitions, 14058-14072 [2016-05699]

Download as PDF 14058 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules O. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note) requires Federal agencies adopting Government technical standards to consider whether voluntary consensus standards are available. This Act also requires Agencies to ‘‘use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies’’ to carry out policy objectives determined by the agencies, unless the standards are ‘‘inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.’’ If the Agency chooses to adopt its own standards in place of existing voluntary consensus standards, it must explain its decision in a separate statement to OMB. This proposed rule would not involve the adoption of any technical standards. P. Privacy Impact Assessment Section 522 of title I of division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, enacted December 8, 2004 (Pub. L. 108–447, 118 Stat. 2809, 3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note), requires the Agency to conduct a privacy impact assessment (PIA) of a regulation that will affect the privacy of individuals. In accordance with this Act, a privacy impact analysis is warranted to address any privacy implications contemplated in the rulemaking. The Agency submitted a Privacy Threshold Assessment analyzing the privacy implications to the Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary’s Privacy Office to determine whether a PIA is required. The DOT Chief Privacy Officer has evaluated the risks and effects that this rulemaking might have on collecting, storing, and sharing PII and has examined protections and alternative information handling processes in order to mitigate potential privacy risks. There are no privacy risks and effects associated with this proposed rule. List of Subjects 49 CFR 383 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, Highway safety, Motor carriers. 49 CFR Part 384 Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, Highway safety, Motor carriers. In consideration of the foregoing, FMCSA proposes to amend 49 CFR chapter 3, parts 383 and 384 to read as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PART 383—COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES 1. The authority citation for part 383 is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502; secs. 214 and 215 of Pub. L. 106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, 1766, 1767; sec. 1012(b) of Pub. L. 107–56, 115 Stat. 272, 297, sec. 4140 of Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1746; sec. 32934 of Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405, 830; and 49 CFR 1.87. 2. Amend § 383.5 by adding the definition of ‘‘Military services’’ in alphabetical order to read as follows: ■ § 383.5 Definitions. * * * * * Military services means the United States Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard, and their associated reserve, National Guard, and Auxiliary units. * * * * * ■ 3. Amend § 383.77 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: them its knowledge and skills tests, in accordance with subparts F, G, and H of this part. Such completed application and test results must be transmitted electronically directly from the testing State to the State of domicile of such personnel in an efficient and secure manner. (2) The State of domicile of a CLP or CDL applicant on active military duty must accept the completed application form and results of knowledge and skills tests administered to the applicant by the State where he or she is currently stationed, as authorized by paragraph (b)(1) of this section, in accordance with subparts F, G, and H of this part, in fulfillment of the applicant’s application and testing requirements under § 383.71, and the State’s test administration requirements under § 383.73, and issue the applicant a CLP or CDL. PART 384—STATE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE PROGRAM 5. The authority citation for part 384 continues to read as follows: § 383.77 Substitute for driving skills tests for drivers with military CMV experience. ■ * Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136, 31301 et seq., and 31502; secs. 103 and 215 of Pub. L. 106– 59, 113 Stat. 1753, 1767; and 49 CFR 1.87. * * * * (b) * * * (1) Is regularly employed or was regularly employed within the last year in a military position requiring operation of a CMV; * * * * * ■ 4. Revise § 383.79 to read as follows: § 383.79 Testing of out-of-State applicants and military personnel. (a) Applicant. (1) A State may administer its skills test, in accordance with subparts F, G, and H of this part, to a person who has taken training in that State and is to be licensed in another U.S. jurisdiction (i.e., his/her State of domicile). A State that administers such a test must transmit the test result electronically directly from the testing State to the licensing State in an efficient and secure manner. (2) The State of domicile of a CDL applicant must accept the results of a skills test administered to the applicant by any other State, in accordance with subparts F, G, and H of this part, in fulfillment of the applicant’s testing requirements under § 383.71, and the State’s test administration requirements under § 383.73. (b) Military personnel. (1) A State where active duty military personnel who are operating in a Military Occupational Specialty as full-time commercial motor vehicle drivers are stationed, but not domiciled, may accept an application for a CLP or CDL from such personnel and administer to PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 6. Amend § 384.301 by adding paragraph (j) to read as follows: ■ § 384.301 Substantial compliance general requirements. * * * * * (j) A State must come into substantial compliance with the requirements of subpart B of this part and part 383 of this chapter in effect as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE] as soon as practical, but, unless otherwise specifically provided in this part, not later than [3 YEARS AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL RULE]. Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: March 9, 2016. T.F. Scott Darling, III, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. 2016–05913 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [4500030115] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 29 Petitions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Notice of petition findings and initiation of status reviews. ACTION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90day findings on various petitions to list, reclassify, or delist fish, wildlife, or plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Based on our review, we find that 13 petitions do not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted, and we are not initiating status reviews in response to these petitions. We refer to these as ‘‘notsubstantial’’ petition findings. We also find that 16 petitions present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted. Therefore, with the publication of this document, we announce that we plan to initiate a review of the status of these species to determine if the petitioned actions are warranted. To ensure that these status reviews are comprehensive, we are requesting scientific and commercial data and other information regarding these species. Based on the status reviews, we will issue 12-month findings on the petitions, which will address whether the petitioned action is warranted, as provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. DATES: When we conduct status reviews, we will consider all information that we have received. To ensure that we will have adequate time to consider submitted information during the status reviews, we request SUMMARY: that we receive information no later than May 16, 2016. For information submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below), this would mean submitting the information electronically by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on that date. ADDRESSES: Not-substantial petition findings: The not-substantial petition findings announced in this document are available on https:// www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number (see Table 1 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION), or on the Service’s Web site at https:// ecos.fws.gov. Supporting information in preparing these findings is available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours by contacting the appropriate person, as specified under Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. If you have new information concerning the status of, or threats to, any of these species or their habitats, please submit that information to the person listed under Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Status reviews: You may submit information on species for which a status review is being initiated by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the appropriate docket number (see Table 2 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). You may submit information by clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’ If your information will fit in the provided comment box, please use this feature of https://www.regulations.gov, as it is most compatible with our information review procedures. If you attach your information as a separate document, our preferred file format is Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple comments (such as form letters), our preferred format is a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel. (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate docket number; see Table 2 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION]; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041– 3803. We request that you send information only by the methods described above. We will post all information received on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see Request for Information for Status Reviews for more information). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: See Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific people to contact for each species. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Not Substantial Findings The not-substantial petition findings announced in this document are listed in Table 1 below, and are available on https://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number, or on the Service’s Web site at https://ecos.fws.gov. TABLE 1—LIST OF NOT-SUBSTANTIAL FINDINGS Common name mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Acuna cactus—delist ................ Arizona night lizard ................... Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle .... Bezy’s night lizard ..................... Cheoah Bald salamander ......... Cow Knob salamander ............. MacDougal’s yellowtops ........... Monito skink .............................. Navasota ladies-tresses—delist Patagonia eyed silkmoth .......... Reticulate collared lizard .......... South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander. Southern dusky salamander ..... VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0025 FWS–R2–ES–2015–0075 FWS–R2–ES–2016–0027 FWS–R2–ES–2015–0076 FWS–R4–ES–2015–0081 FWS–R5–ES–2015–0084 FWS–R2–ES–2016–0033 FWS–R4–ES–2016–0034 FWS–R2–ES–2016–0035 FWS–R2–ES–2016–0036 FWS–R2–ES–2015–0109 FWS–R4–ES–2015–0117 URL to docket in Regulations.gov ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0025. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2015-0075. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0027. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2015-0076. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0081. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R5-ES-2015-0084. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0033. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2016-0034. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0035. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0036. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0109. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0117. FWS–R4–ES–2016–0038 ....... https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2016-0038. Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14059 E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14060 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Substantial Findings List of Substantial Findings The list of substantial findings is given below in Table 2. TABLE 2—LIST OF SUBSTANTIAL FINDINGS FOR WHICH A STATUS REVIEW IS BEING INITIATED. Docket No. African elephant—reclassify ..... American burying beetle—delist Chinese pangolin ...................... Deseret milkvetch—delist ......... Giant ground pangolin .............. Indian pangolin ......................... Leoncita false-foxglove ............. Long-tailed pangolin ................. Philippine pangolin .................... Rio Grande chub ...................... Rio Grande sucker .................... Southwestern willow flycatcher—delist. Sunda pangolin ......................... Tree pangolin ............................ Western bumble bee ................ Yellow-banded bumble bee ...... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Common name FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0010 ...... FWS–R2–ES–2016–0011 ....... FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0012 ...... FWS–R6–ES–2016–0013 ....... FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0014 ...... FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0015 ...... FWS–R2–ES–2016–0016 ....... FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0017 ...... FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0018 ...... FWS–R2–ES–2016–0019 ....... FWS–R2–ES–2016–0020 ....... FWS–R2–ES–2016–0039 ....... https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0010. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0011. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0012. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2016-0013. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0014. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0015. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0016. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0017. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0018. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0019. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0020. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R2-ES-2016-0039. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0021 ...... FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0022 ...... FWS–R6–ES–2016–0023 ....... FWS–R5–ES–2016–0024 ....... https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0021. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0022. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2016-0023. https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R5-ES-2016-0024. Request for Information for Status Reviews When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial information indicating that listing, reclassification, or delisting a species may be warranted, we are required to review the status of the species (status review). For the status review to be complete and based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we request information on these species from governmental agencies, Native American Tribes, the scientific community, industry, and any other interested parties. We seek information on: (1) The species’ biology, range, and population trends, including: (a) Habitat requirements; (b) Genetics and taxonomy; (c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns; and (d) Historical and current population levels, and current and projected trends. (2) The five factors that are the basis for making a listing, reclassification, or delisting determination for a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including past and ongoing conservation measures that could decrease the extent to which one or more of the factors affect the species, its habitat, or both. The five factors are: (a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range (Factor A); (b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes (Factor B); VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 URL to docket in Regulations.gov (c) Disease or predation (Factor C); (d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor D); or (e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (Factor E). (3) The potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat, and the extent to which it affects the habitat or range of the species. If, after the status review, we determine that listing is warranted, we will propose critical habitat (see definition in section 3(5)(A) of the Act) for domestic (U.S.) species under section 4 of the Act, to the maximum extent prudent and determinable at the time we propose to list the species. Therefore, we also request data and information for the species listed in Table 2 (to be submitted as provided for in the ADDRESSES section) on: (1) What may constitute ‘‘physical or biological features essential to the conservation of the species,’’ within the geographical range occupied by the species; (2) Where these features are currently found; (3) Whether any of these features may require special management considerations or protection; (4) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species that are ‘‘essential for the conservation of the species’’; and (5) What, if any, critical habitat you think we should propose for designation if the species is proposed for listing, and why such habitat falls within the PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 definition of ‘‘critical habitat’’ at section 3(5) of the Act. Please include sufficient information with your submission (such as scientific journal articles or other publications) to allow us to verify any scientific or commercial information you include. Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the actions under consideration without providing supporting information, although noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.’’ You may submit your information concerning these status reviews by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit information via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission—including any personal identifying information—will be posted on the Web site. If you submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying information, you may request at the top of your document that we withhold this personal identifying information from public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all hardcopy submissions on https:// www.regulations.gov. Contacts Contact information is provided below in Table 3 for both substantial and not-substantial findings. E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules 14061 TABLE 3—CONTACTS Common name Contact person Acuna cactus ................................................................................. African elephant ............................................................................. American burying beetle ................................................................ Arizona night lizard ........................................................................ Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle ......................................................... Bezy’s night lizard .......................................................................... Cheoah Bald salamander .............................................................. Chinese pangolin ........................................................................... Cow Knob salamander .................................................................. Deseret milkvetch .......................................................................... Giant ground pangolin ................................................................... Indian pangolin .............................................................................. Leoncita false-foxglove .................................................................. Long-tailed pangolin ...................................................................... MacDougal’s yellowtops ................................................................ Monito skink ................................................................................... Navasota ladies-tresses ................................................................ Patagonia eyed silkmoth ............................................................... Philippine pangolin ......................................................................... Reticulate collared lizard ............................................................... Rio Grande chub ........................................................................... Rio Grande sucker ......................................................................... South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander ................................... Southern dusky salamander .......................................................... Southwestern willow flycatcher ...................................................... Sunda pangolin .............................................................................. Tree pangolin ................................................................................. Western bumble bee ..................................................................... Yellow-banded bumble bee ........................................................... Brady McGee, 505–248–6657; Brady_McGee@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Brady McGee, 505–248–6657; Brady_McGee@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Sue Cameron, 828–258–3939; Susan_Cameron@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Krishna Gifford, 413–253–8619; Krishna_Gifford@fws.gov. Larry Crist, 801–975–3330 x126; Larry_Crist@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshogianis@fws.gov. Brady McGee, 505–248–6657; Brady_McGee@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505–248–6920; Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov. Sue Cameron, 828–258–3939; Susan_Cameron@fws.gov. Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshogianis@fws.gov. Brady McGee, 505–248–6657; Brady_McGee@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Jessica Evans, 703–358–2141; Jessica_Evans@fws.gov. Mark Sattelberg, 307–772–2374; Mark_Sattelberg@fws.gov. Krishna Gifford, 413–253–8619; Krishna_Gifford@fws.gov. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. Background Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. To the maximum extent practicable, we are to make this finding within 90 days of our receipt of the petition and publish our notice of the finding promptly in the Federal Register. Our regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) establish that the standard for substantial scientific or commercial information with regard to a 90-day petition finding is ‘‘that amount of information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in the petition may be warranted’’ (50 CFR 424.14(b)). If we find that a petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information, we are required to promptly commence a review of the status of the species, and we will subsequently summarize the status review in our 12-month finding. Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing regulations at 50 CFR part 424 set forth the procedures for adding a species to, or removing a species from, the Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. A species may be determined to be an endangered or VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 threatened species because of one or more of the five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). In considering whether conditions described within one or more of the factors might constitute threats, we must look beyond the exposure of the species to those conditions to evaluate whether the species may respond to the conditions in a way that causes actual impacts to the species. If there is exposure to a condition and the species responds negatively, the condition qualifies as a stressor and, during the subsequent status review, we attempt to determine how significant the stressor is. If the stressor is sufficiently significant that it drives, or contributes to, the risk of extinction of the species such that the species may warrant listing as endangered or threatened as those terms are defined in the Act, the stressor constitutes a threat to the species. Thus, the identification of conditions that could affect a species negatively may not be sufficient to compel a finding that the information in the petition and our files is substantial. The information must include evidence sufficient to suggest that these conditions may be operative threats that act on the species to a sufficient degree that the species may meet the definition PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 of an endangered or threatened species under the Act. Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Acuna Cactus From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0025 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Acuna cactus (Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis): Arizona; Mexico Petition History On October 21, 2014, we received a petition dated October 8, 2014, from Freeport-McMoRan Minerals Corporation requesting the acuna cactus be delisted under the Act due to invalid taxonomy, larger range than previously known, and lack of adequate monitoring and survey data resulting in overstated decline in populations. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a December 18, 2014, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we received the petition. This finding addresses the petition. E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14062 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for the acuna cactus (Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that delisting the acuna cactus may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0025 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of Two Petitions To Reclassify the African Elephant From a Threatened Species to an Endangered Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0010 under the Supporting Documents section. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Species and Range African elephant (Loxodonta africana): Angola; Benin; Botswana; Burkina Faso; Cameroon; Central African Republic; Chad; Congo; ˆ Democratic Republic of the Congo; Cote d’Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Ethiopia; Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Kenya; Liberia; Malawi; Mali; Mozambique; Namibia; Niger; Nigeria; Rwanda; Senegal; Sierra Leone; Somalia; South Africa; South Sudan; Swaziland; Tanzania; Togo; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe Petitions History On February 12, 2015, we received an electronic petition dated February 11, 2015, from the International Fund for Animal Welfare, Humane Society International, Humane Society of the United States, and Fund for Animals requesting that the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) be reclassified from threatened status to endangered status under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a June 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On June 10, 2015, we received a second petition dated June 10, 2015, from the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) requesting that the listed African elephant be reclassified from a single species (Loxodonta africana) into two separate species, forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) and savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana); the petition also requested to have both species reclassified as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a June 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions requested the same action for the same species, this finding will address both petitions. Additionally, although CBD requested that the listed African elephant be reclassified from a single species (Loxodonta africana) into two separate species, the forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) and the savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana), a taxonomic change is beyond the scope of our initial 90-day finding, and we will instead consider whether such a change is warranted as part of our status review and 12-month finding for the species. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the American Burying Beetle From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0011 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus): Arkansas, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Texas Petition History On August 18, 2015, we received a petition dated August 18, 2015, via electronic mail from American Stewards of Liberty, the Independent Petroleum Association of America, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and Dr. Steven W. Carothers (petitioners) requesting that the American burying beetle be delisted under the Act due to error in information such that the existence or magnitude of threats to the species, or both, do not support a conclusion that the species is at risk of extinction now or in the foreseeable future. The petition clearly identified itself as a petition and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, as required by 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for the American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus), based on a lack of threats under any of the five listing factors. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Evaluation of a Petition To List the Arizona Night Lizard as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2015–0075 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Arizona night lizard (Xantusia arizonae): Arizona Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the Arizona night lizard, be listed under the Act as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the Arizona night lizard. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Arizona night lizard (Xantusia arizonae). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Arizona night lizard may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2015–0075 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Arizona Wetsalts Tiger Beetle as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0027 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle (Cicindela haemorrhagica arizonae): VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 Arizona and Utah. This is a subspecies of the wetsalts tiger beetle (Cicindela haemorrhagica). Petition History On May 1, 2015, we received a petition dated May 1, 2015, from CBD requesting that the Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle be listed as threatened or endangered under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a June 4, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle (Cicindela haemorrhagica arizonae). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0027 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To List Bezy’s Night Lizard as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2015–0076 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Bezy’s night lizard (Xantusia bezyi): Arizona Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including Bezy’s night lizard, be listed under the Act as PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14063 endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses Bezy’s night lizard. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for Bezy’s night lizard (Xantusia bezyi). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing Bezy’s night lizard may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2015–0076 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Cheoah Bald Salamander as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2015–0081 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Cheoah Bald salamander (Plethodon cheoah): North Carolina Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the Cheoah Bald salamander, be listed under the Act as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the Cheoah Bald salamander. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14064 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Cheoah Bald salamander (Plethodon cheoah). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Cheoah Bald salamander may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2015–0081 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Chinese Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0012 under the Supporting Documents section. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Species and Range Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla): Himalayan foothills, northern India; southern Bhutan; northeastern Bangladesh; northern Lao PDR; southern China; Taiwan; Hong Kong SAR; northern Viet Nam; northwest Thailand; and northern and western Myanmar Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from Born Free USA (BFUSA), CBD, Humane Society International (HSI), The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), and the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of these species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Evaluation of a Petition To List the Cow Knob Salamander as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2015–0084 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Cow Knob (or white-spotted) salamander (Plethodon punctatus): Virginia, West Virginia Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the Cow Knob (or white-spotted) salamander, be listed under the Act as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the Cow Knob salamander. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Cow Knob (or white-spotted) salamander (Plethodon punctatus). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Cow Knob salamander may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2015–0084 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Deseret Milkvetch From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2016–0013 under the Supporting Documents section. E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Species and Range Deseret milkvetch (Astragalus desereticus): Utah Petition History We received a petition dated October 6, 2015, from Western Area Power Administration requesting that Deseret milkvetch (currently listed as threatened), be delisted under the Act due to new information. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for the Deseret milkvetch (Astragalus desereticus), based on a lack of threats under any of the five listing factors. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Giant Ground Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0014 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Giant ground pangolin (Manis gigantean): Cameroon; Central African Republic; Congo; Congo, The ˆ Democratic Republic of the; Cote d’Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea (Bioko, Equatorial Guinea (mainland)); Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Liberia; Senegal; Sierra Leone; Tanzania, United Republic of; Uganda Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA, CBD, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of these species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the giant ground pangolin (Manis gigantean). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14065 information indicating that listing the giant ground pangolin (Manis gigantean) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Indian Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0015 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata): Bangladesh; India; Nepal; Pakistan; Sri Lanka Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA, CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14066 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of the species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the Indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata). Finding mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Leoncita False-Foxglove as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 FWS–R2–ES–2016–0016 under the Supporting Documents section. Guinea (mainland)); Gabon; Ghana; Liberia; Nigeria; Sierra Leone Species and Range Leoncita false-foxglove (Agalinis calycina): New Mexico, Texas; Mexico Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA, CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of the species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioners, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the long-tailed pangolin (Manis tetradactyla). Petition History On September 19, 2012, we received a petition dated September 6, 2012, from The Native Plant Society of New Mexico requesting that Leoncita falsefoxglove be listed as endangered and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a July 1, 2013, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Leoncita false-foxglove (Agalinis calycina) may be warranted, based on Factors A, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Long-tailed Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0017 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Long-tailed pangolin (Manis tetradactyla): Cameroon; Central African Republic; Congo; Congo, The ˆ Democratic Republic of the; Cote d’Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea (Equatorial PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the long-tailed pangolin (Manis tetradactyla) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List MacDougal’s Yellowtops as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0033 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range MacDougal’s Yellowtops (Flaveria macdougalii): Arizona mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Petition History On May 1, 2015, we received a petition dated May 1, 2015, from CBD, Tara Easter, and Robin Silver requesting that MacDougal’s yellowtops (Flaveria macdougalii) be emergency listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated for the species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). Because the Act does not provide for petitions to emergency list, we are considering it as a petition to list MacDougal’s yellowtops. However, we did consider the immediacy of possible threats to the species and whether emergency listing may be necessary at this time. In a June 4, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. This finding addresses the petition. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for MacDougal’s yellowtops (Flaveria macdougalii). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing MacDougal’s yellowtops may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0033 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Monito Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2016–0034 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Monito skink (Spondylurus monitae): Puerto Rico Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from CBD requesting that the Culebra skink (Spondylurus culebrae), Mona Skink (Spondylurus monae), Monito Skink (Spondylurus Monitoe), Lesser Virgin Islands Skink (Spondylurus semitaeniatus), Virgin Islands Bronze Skink (Spondylurus sloanii), Puerto Rican Skink (Spondylurus nitidus), Greater Saint Croix Skink (Spondylurus magnacruzae), Greater Virgin Islands Skink (Spondylurus spilonotus), and Lesser Saint Croix Skink (Capitellum parvicruzae) be listed as endangered and critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses one of the nine species identified in the petition: the Monito skink. The Culebra skink, Greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14067 Greater Virgin Islands skink, and Lesser Saint Croix skink were addressed in a separate finding, which was published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2016 (81 FR 1368). We will address the Lesser Virgin Islands skink in a separate evaluation. This finding addresses the Monito skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Monito skink (Spondylurus monitae). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Monito skink may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2016–0034 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To Remove Navasota Ladies-Tresses From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0035 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Navasota ladies-tresses (Spiranthes parksii): Texas Petition History On May 26, 2015, we received a petition dated May 26, 2015, by electronic mail, from American Stewards of Liberty and Dr. Steve W. Carothers requesting that Navasota ladies-tresses be delisted under the Act due to error in information. The petition clearly identified itself as a petition and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, as required by 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14068 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for Navasota ladies-tresses (Spiranthes parksii). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that delisting Navasota ladies-tresses may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0035 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Patagonia Eyed Silkmoth as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0036 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Patagonia eyed silkmoth (Automeris patagoniensis): Arizona; Mexico mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Petition History On June 29, 2015, we received a petition dated June 17, 2015, from Defenders of Wildlife and Patagonia Area Resource Alliance requesting that the Patagonia eyed silkmoth be listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Patagonia eyed silkmoth (Automeris patagoniensis). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Patagonia eyed silkmoth may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0036 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Philippine Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0018 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis): Philippines Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA, CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of the species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioners, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioners, we responded that we PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Reticulate Collared Lizard as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2015–0109 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Reticulate Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus reticulatus): Texas; Mexico Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the reticulate collared lizard, be listed under the Act as threatened or endangered species and critical habitat E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the reticulate collared lizard (Crotaphytus reticulatus). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the reticulate collared lizard may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2015–0109 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Rio Grande Chub as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0019 under the Supporting Documents section. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Species and Range Rio Grande chub (Gila pandora): New Mexico, Texas. Petition History On September 30, 2013, we received a petition dated September 27, 2013, from Wild Earth Guardians requesting that the Rio Grande chub be listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Rio Grande chub (Gila pandora) may be VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 warranted, based on Factors A, C, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Rio Grande Sucker as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0020 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Rio Grande sucker (Catostomus plebeius): Colorado, New Mexico; Mexico. Petition History On October 3, 2014, we received a petition dated September 29, 2014, from WildEarth Guardians requesting that Rio Grande sucker (also known as the Rio Grande mountain-sucker, or matelote del bravo) be listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Rio Grande sucker (Catostomus plebeius) may be warranted, based on Factors A, C, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either ‘‘endangered species’’ under section 3(6) of the Act or ‘‘threatened species’’ under section 3(20), including PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14069 information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the South Mountain Gray-Cheeked Salamander as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2015–0117 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander (Plethodon meridianus): North Carolina. Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander, be listed under the Act as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the South Mountain graycheeked salamander. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander (Plethodon meridianus). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the South Mountain graycheeked salamander may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2015–0117 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14070 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules Evaluation of a Petition To List the Southern Dusky Salamander as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2016–0038 under the Supporting Documents section. www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0039 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Southern dusky salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus): Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia. Petition History On August, 20, 2015, we received a petition dated August 19, 2015, from The Pacific Legal Foundation (representing The Center for Environmental Science, Accuracy, and Reliability; Building Industry Legal Defense Fund; California Building Industry Association; California Cattlemen’s Association; New Mexico Business Coalition, New Mexico Cattle Growers Association; New Mexico Farm and Livestock Bureau; and New Mexico Wool Growers Inc.), requesting that the southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) be delisted due to error in information under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Petition History On April 2, 2015, we received a petition from the Coastal Plains Institute and Land Conservancy requesting that southern dusky salamander be listed as threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information required at 50 CFR 424.14(a); however, it did not contain copies of supporting documents. We acknowledged receipt of the petition via email on April 22, 2015. Additional materials were received on June 10, 2015. This finding addresses the petition. Species and Range Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus): California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, and Nevada, Texas; winters in Central and South America. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Southern dusky salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Southern dusky salamander may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2016–0038 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for the Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), based on information related to taxonomic status. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Sunda Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0021 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica): Brunei Darussalam; Cambodia; Indonesia; Lao People’s Democratic Republic; Malaysia; Myanmar; Singapore; Thailand; Viet Nam. Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA, CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of the species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Tree Pangolin Under the Endangered Species Act Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2016–0022 under the Supporting Documents section. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Species and Range Tree pangolin (Manis tricuspis): Angola (Angola); Benin; Cameroon; Central African Republic; Congo; Congo, ˆ The Democratic Republic of the; Cote d’Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea (Bioko, Equatorial Guinea (mainland)); Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Kenya; Liberia; Nigeria; Rwanda; Sierra Leone; South Sudan; Tanzania, United Republic of; Togo; Uganda; Zambia. Petitions History On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA, CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as endangered species under the Act. The VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the longtailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the petitioners’ claim of the species’ similarity of appearance to the currently listed Temminck’s ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act. As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin, we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section 4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding. This finding addresses the tree pangolin (Manis tricuspis). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the tree pangolin (Manis tricuspis) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14071 information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Western Bumble Bee as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2016–0023 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Western bumble bee (Bombus occidentalis): Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, Wyoming, Utah; Canada: Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Yukon Territory. Petition History On September 21, 2015, we received a petition dated September 15, 2015, from Defenders of Wildlife requesting that the western bumble bee be listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the western bumble bee (Bombus occidentalis) may be warranted, based on Factors C, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for the western bumble bee, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1 14072 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Yellow-Banded Bumble Bee as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2016–0024 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Yellow-banded bumble bee (Bombus terricola): Connecticut, Kentucky, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin; Canada: Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Petition History On September 15, 2015, we received a petition dated September 15, 2015, from Defenders of Wildlife requesting that the yellow-banded bumble bee (Bombus terricola) be listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the yellow-banded bumble bee (Bombus terricola) may be warranted, based on Factors A, C, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Mar 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 Conclusion On the basis of our evaluation of the information presented in the petitions under section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have determined that the petitions summarized above for the acuna cacus, Arizona night lizard, Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle, Bezy’s night lizard, Cheoah Bald salamander, Cow Knob salamander, MacDougal’s yellowtops, Monito skink, Navasota ladies-tresses, Patagonia eyed silkmoth, reticulate collared lizard, South Mountain graycheeked salamander, and southern dusky salamander do not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the requested actions may be warranted. Therefore, we are not initiating status reviews for these species. The petitions summarized above for the African elephant, American burying beetle, Chinese pangolin, deseret milkvetch, giant ground pangolin, Indian pangolin, Leoncita falsefoxglove, long-tailed pangolin, Philippine pangolin, Rio Grande chub, Rio Grande sucker, Sunda pangolin, tree pangolin, southwestern willow flycatcher, western bumble bee, and yellow-banded bumble bee present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the requested actions may be warranted. Because we have found that these petitions present substantial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted, we are initiating status reviews to determine whether these actions under the Act are warranted. At the conclusion of each status review, we will issue a finding, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to whether or not the Service finds that the petitioned action is warranted. It is important to note that the standard for a 90-day finding differs from the Act’s standard that applies to a status review to determine whether a petitioned action is warranted. In making a 90-day finding, we consider only the information in the petition and in our files, and we evaluate merely whether that information constitutes ‘‘substantial information’’ indicating that the petitioned action ‘‘may be warranted.’’ In a 12-month finding, we must complete a thorough status review of the species and evaluate the ‘‘best scientific and commercial data available’’ to determine whether a petitioned action ‘‘is warranted.’’ Because the Act’s standards for 90-day and 12-month findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that the 12-month finding will result in a ‘‘warranted’’ finding. PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 References Cited A complete list of references cited is available on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov and upon request from the appropriate lead field offices (contact the person listed under Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Authors The primary authors of this notice are staff members of the Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Authority The authority for these actions is the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: February 24, 2016. Stephen Guertin, Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2016–05699 Filed 3–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333–15–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 648 [Docket No. 150902808–6155–01] RIN 0648–BF04 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Amendment 17 to the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments. AGENCY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement Amendment 17 to the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan. Amendment 17 management measures were developed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council to: Add cost recovery provisions for the Individual Transferable Quota component of the fishery; modify how biological reference points are incorporated into the fishery management plan; and remove the plan’s optimum yield range. These changes are intended to make the management plan consistent with requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and to improve the management of these fisheries. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 15, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA– SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14058-14072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05699]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[4500030115]

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on
29 Petitions

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

[[Page 14059]]

ACTION: Notice of petition findings and initiation of status reviews.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90-
day findings on various petitions to list, reclassify, or delist fish,
wildlife, or plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). Based on our review, we find that 13 petitions do not
present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating
that the petitioned actions may be warranted, and we are not initiating
status reviews in response to these petitions. We refer to these as
``not-substantial'' petition findings. We also find that 16 petitions
present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating
that the petitioned actions may be warranted. Therefore, with the
publication of this document, we announce that we plan to initiate a
review of the status of these species to determine if the petitioned
actions are warranted. To ensure that these status reviews are
comprehensive, we are requesting scientific and commercial data and
other information regarding these species. Based on the status reviews,
we will issue 12-month findings on the petitions, which will address
whether the petitioned action is warranted, as provided in section
4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.

DATES: When we conduct status reviews, we will consider all information
that we have received. To ensure that we will have adequate time to
consider submitted information during the status reviews, we request
that we receive information no later than May 16, 2016. For information
submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
ADDRESSES, below), this would mean submitting the information
electronically by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on that date.

ADDRESSES: Not-substantial petition findings: The not-substantial
petition findings announced in this document are available on https://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number (see Table 1 in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION), or on the Service's Web site at https://ecos.fws.gov. Supporting information in preparing these findings is
available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business
hours by contacting the appropriate person, as specified under Table 3
in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. If you have new information concerning
the status of, or threats to, any of these species or their habitats,
please submit that information to the person listed under Table 3 in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Status reviews: You may submit information on species for which a
status review is being initiated by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the appropriate docket
number (see Table 2 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). You may submit
information by clicking on ``Comment Now!'' If your information will
fit in the provided comment box, please use this feature of https://www.regulations.gov, as it is most compatible with our information
review procedures. If you attach your information as a separate
document, our preferred file format is Microsoft Word. If you attach
multiple comments (such as form letters), our preferred format is a
spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate docket number; see Table
2 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION]; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS:
BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
We request that you send information only by the methods described
above. We will post all information received on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews for more information).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: See Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific people to contact for each species.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Not Substantial Findings

The not-substantial petition findings announced in this document
are listed in Table 1 below, and are available on https://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number, or on the
Service's Web site at https://ecos.fws.gov.

Table 1--List of Not-Substantial Findings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL to docket in
Common name Docket No. Regulations.gov
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acuna cactus--delist.......... FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
25. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0025.
Arizona night lizard.......... FWS-R2-ES-2015-00 https://
75. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2015-0075.
Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle. FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
27. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0027.
Bezy's night lizard........... FWS-R2-ES-2015-00 https://
76. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2015-0076.
Cheoah Bald salamander........ FWS-R4-ES-2015-00 https://
81. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R4-ES-2015-0081.
Cow Knob salamander........... FWS-R5-ES-2015-00 https://
84. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R5-ES-2015-0084.
MacDougal's yellowtops........ FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
33. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0033.
Monito skink.................. FWS-R4-ES-2016-00 https://
34. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R4-ES-2016-0034.
Navasota ladies-tresses-- FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
delist. 35. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0035.
Patagonia eyed silkmoth....... FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
36. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0036.
Reticulate collared lizard.... FWS-R2-ES-2015-01 https://
09. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R4-ES-2015-0109.
South Mountain gray-cheeked FWS-R4-ES-2015-01 https://
salamander. 17. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R4-ES-2015-0117.
Southern dusky salamander..... FWS-R4-ES-2016-00 https://
38. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R4-ES-2016-0038.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14060]]

Substantial Findings

List of Substantial Findings

The list of substantial findings is given below in Table 2.

Table 2--List of Substantial Findings for Which a Status Review Is Being
Initiated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL to docket in
Common name Docket No. Regulations.gov
------------------------------------------------------------------------
African elephant--reclassify.. FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
10. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0010.
American burying beetle-- FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
delist. 11. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0011.
Chinese pangolin.............. FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
12. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0012.
Deseret milkvetch--delist..... FWS-R6-ES-2016-00 https://
13. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R6-ES-2016-0013.
Giant ground pangolin......... FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
14. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0014.
Indian pangolin............... FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
15. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0015.
Leoncita false-foxglove....... FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
16. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0016.
Long-tailed pangolin.......... FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
17. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0017.
Philippine pangolin........... FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
18. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0018.
Rio Grande chub............... FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
19. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0019.
Rio Grande sucker............. FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
20. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0020.
Southwestern willow FWS-R2-ES-2016-00 https://
flycatcher--delist. 39. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R2-ES-2016-0039.
Sunda pangolin................ FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
21. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0021.
Tree pangolin................. FWS-HQ-ES-2016-00 https://
22. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
HQ-ES-2016-0022.
Western bumble bee............ FWS-R6-ES-2016-00 https://
23. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R6-ES-2016-0023.
Yellow-banded bumble bee...... FWS-R5-ES-2016-00 https://
24. www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FWS-
R5-ES-2016-0024.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Request for Information for Status Reviews

When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing, reclassification, or delisting a
species may be warranted, we are required to review the status of the
species (status review). For the status review to be complete and based
on the best available scientific and commercial information, we request
information on these species from governmental agencies, Native
American Tribes, the scientific community, industry, and any other
interested parties. We seek information on:
(1) The species' biology, range, and population trends, including:
(a) Habitat requirements;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy;
(c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns;
and
(d) Historical and current population levels, and current and
projected trends.
(2) The five factors that are the basis for making a listing,
reclassification, or delisting determination for a species under
section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including past and
ongoing conservation measures that could decrease the extent to which
one or more of the factors affect the species, its habitat, or both.
The five factors are:
(a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range (Factor A);
(b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes (Factor B);
(c) Disease or predation (Factor C);
(d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor D); or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence (Factor E).
(3) The potential effects of climate change on the species and its
habitat, and the extent to which it affects the habitat or range of the
species.
If, after the status review, we determine that listing is
warranted, we will propose critical habitat (see definition in section
3(5)(A) of the Act) for domestic (U.S.) species under section 4 of the
Act, to the maximum extent prudent and determinable at the time we
propose to list the species. Therefore, we also request data and
information for the species listed in Table 2 (to be submitted as
provided for in the ADDRESSES section) on:
(1) What may constitute ``physical or biological features essential
to the conservation of the species,'' within the geographical range
occupied by the species;
(2) Where these features are currently found;
(3) Whether any of these features may require special management
considerations or protection;
(4) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the
species that are ``essential for the conservation of the species''; and
(5) What, if any, critical habitat you think we should propose for
designation if the species is proposed for listing, and why such
habitat falls within the definition of ``critical habitat'' at section
3(5) of the Act.
Please include sufficient information with your submission (such as
scientific journal articles or other publications) to allow us to
verify any scientific or commercial information you include.
Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the actions
under consideration without providing supporting information, although
noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any
species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ``solely on
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.''
You may submit your information concerning these status reviews by
one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit
information via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission--
including any personal identifying information--will be posted on the
Web site. If you submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying
information, you may request at the top of your document that we
withhold this personal identifying information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will
post all hardcopy submissions on https://www.regulations.gov.

Contacts

Contact information is provided below in Table 3 for both
substantial and not-substantial findings.

[[Page 14061]]

Table 3--Contacts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common name Contact person
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acuna cactus........................................................................ Brady McGee, 505-248-6657;
Brady_McGee@fws.gov.
African elephant.................................................................... Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
American burying beetle............................................................. Brady McGee, 505-248-6657;
Brady_McGee@fws.gov.
Arizona night lizard................................................................ Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle....................................................... Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Bezy's night lizard................................................................. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Cheoah Bald salamander.............................................................. Sue Cameron, 828-258-3939;
Susan_Cameron@fws.gov.
Chinese pangolin.................................................................... Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
Cow Knob salamander................................................................. Krishna Gifford, 413-253-
8619;
Krishna_Gifford@fws.gov.
Deseret milkvetch................................................................... Larry Crist, 801-975-3330
x126;
Larry_Crist@fws.gov.
Giant ground pangolin............................................................... Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
Indian pangolin..................................................................... Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
Leoncita false-foxglove............................................................. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Long-tailed pangolin................................................................ Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
MacDougal's yellowtops.............................................................. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Monito skink........................................................................ Andreas Moshogianis, 404-
679-7119;
Andreas_Moshogianis@fws.gov.
Navasota ladies-tresses............................................................. Brady McGee, 505-248-6657;
Brady_McGee@fws.gov.
Patagonia eyed silkmoth............................................................. Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Philippine pangolin................................................................. Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
Reticulate collared lizard.......................................................... Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Rio Grande chub..................................................................... Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
Rio Grande sucker................................................................... Michelle Shaughnessy, 505-
248-6920;
Michelle_Shaughnessy@fws.gov.
South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander.............................................. Sue Cameron, 828-258-3939;
Susan_Cameron@fws.gov.
Southern dusky salamander........................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-
679-7119;
Andreas_Moshogianis@fws.gov.
Southwestern willow flycatcher...................................................... Brady McGee, 505-248-6657;
Brady_McGee@fws.gov.
Sunda pangolin...................................................................... Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
Tree pangolin....................................................................... Jessica Evans, 703-358-
2141;
Jessica_Evans@fws.gov.
Western bumble bee.................................................................. Mark Sattelberg, 307-772-
2374;
Mark_Sattelberg@fws.gov.
Yellow-banded bumble bee............................................................ Krishna Gifford, 413-253-
8619;
Krishna_Gifford@fws.gov.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800-877-8339.

Background

Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on
whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species presents
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. To the maximum extent practicable,
we are to make this finding within 90 days of our receipt of the
petition and publish our notice of the finding promptly in the Federal
Register.
Our regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) establish
that the standard for substantial scientific or commercial information
with regard to a 90-day petition finding is ``that amount of
information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the
measure proposed in the petition may be warranted'' (50 CFR 424.14(b)).
If we find that a petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information, we are required to promptly commence a review
of the status of the species, and we will subsequently summarize the
status review in our 12-month finding.
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing
regulations at 50 CFR part 424 set forth the procedures for adding a
species to, or removing a species from, the Federal Lists of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. A species may be determined to be
an endangered or threatened species because of one or more of the five
factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see Request for
Information for Status Reviews, above).
In considering whether conditions described within one or more of
the factors might constitute threats, we must look beyond the exposure
of the species to those conditions to evaluate whether the species may
respond to the conditions in a way that causes actual impacts to the
species. If there is exposure to a condition and the species responds
negatively, the condition qualifies as a stressor and, during the
subsequent status review, we attempt to determine how significant the
stressor is. If the stressor is sufficiently significant that it
drives, or contributes to, the risk of extinction of the species such
that the species may warrant listing as endangered or threatened as
those terms are defined in the Act, the stressor constitutes a threat
to the species. Thus, the identification of conditions that could
affect a species negatively may not be sufficient to compel a finding
that the information in the petition and our files is substantial. The
information must include evidence sufficient to suggest that these
conditions may be operative threats that act on the species to a
sufficient degree that the species may meet the definition of an
endangered or threatened species under the Act.

Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Acuna Cactus From the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0025 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Acuna cactus (Echinomastus erectocentrus var. acunensis): Arizona;
Mexico

Petition History

On October 21, 2014, we received a petition dated October 8, 2014,
from Freeport-McMoRan Minerals Corporation requesting the acuna cactus
be delisted under the Act due to invalid taxonomy, larger range than
previously known, and lack of adequate monitoring and survey data
resulting in overstated decline in populations. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a
December 18, 2014, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we
received the petition. This finding addresses the petition.

[[Page 14062]]

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action (delisting) may be warranted for the acuna cactus (Echinomastus
erectocentrus var. acunensis). Because the petition does not present
substantial information indicating that delisting the acuna cactus may
be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2016-0025 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To Reclassify the African Elephant From a
Threatened Species to an Endangered Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0010 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

African elephant (Loxodonta africana): Angola; Benin; Botswana;
Burkina Faso; Cameroon; Central African Republic; Chad; Congo;
Democratic Republic of the Congo; C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire; Equatorial
Guinea; Eritrea; Ethiopia; Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Kenya;
Liberia; Malawi; Mali; Mozambique; Namibia; Niger; Nigeria; Rwanda;
Senegal; Sierra Leone; Somalia; South Africa; South Sudan; Swaziland;
Tanzania; Togo; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe

Petitions History

On February 12, 2015, we received an electronic petition dated
February 11, 2015, from the International Fund for Animal Welfare,
Humane Society International, Humane Society of the United States, and
Fund for Animals requesting that the African elephant (Loxodonta
africana) be reclassified from threatened status to endangered status
under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and
included the requisite identification information for the petitioner,
required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a June 17, 2015, letter to the
petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information presented
in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an
emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
On June 10, 2015, we received a second petition dated June 10,
2015, from the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) requesting that
the listed African elephant be reclassified from a single species
(Loxodonta africana) into two separate species, forest elephants
(Loxodonta cyclotis) and savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana); the
petition also requested to have both species reclassified as endangered
species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such
and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a June 17, 2015, letter to
the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the information
presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted
an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions requested the same action for the same species,
this finding will address both petitions. Additionally, although CBD
requested that the listed African elephant be reclassified from a
single species (Loxodonta africana) into two separate species, the
forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) and the savannah elephants
(Loxodonta africana), a taxonomic change is beyond the scope of our
initial 90-day finding, and we will instead consider whether such a
change is warranted as part of our status review and 12-month finding
for the species.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the African elephant
(Loxodonta africana) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the American Burying Beetle From the
List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0011 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus): Arkansas, Kansas,
Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South
Dakota, and Texas

Petition History

On August 18, 2015, we received a petition dated August 18, 2015,
via electronic mail from American Stewards of Liberty, the Independent
Petroleum Association of America, the Texas Public Policy Foundation,
and Dr. Steven W. Carothers (petitioners) requesting that the American
burying beetle be delisted under the Act due to error in information
such that the existence or magnitude of threats to the species, or
both, do not support a conclusion that the species is at risk of
extinction now or in the foreseeable future. The petition clearly
identified itself as a petition and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, as required by 50 CFR
424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action
(delisting) may be warranted for the American burying beetle
(Nicrophorus americanus), based on a lack of threats under any of the
five listing factors. However, during our status review, we will
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species, including the
extent to which any protections or other conservation efforts have
reduced those threats. Thus, for this species, the Service requests any
information relevant to whether the species falls within the definition
of either an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a
threatened species under section 3(20), including information on the
five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors
identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, above).

[[Page 14063]]

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Arizona Night Lizard as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2015-0075 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Arizona night lizard (Xantusia arizonae): Arizona

Petition History

On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including
the Arizona night lizard, be listed under the Act as endangered or
threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). This finding addresses the Arizona night lizard.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Arizona night lizard (Xantusia
arizonae). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing the Arizona night lizard may be
warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2015-0075 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Arizona Wetsalts Tiger Beetle as
an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0027 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle (Cicindela haemorrhagica arizonae):
Arizona and Utah. This is a subspecies of the wetsalts tiger beetle
(Cicindela haemorrhagica).

Petition History

On May 1, 2015, we received a petition dated May 1, 2015, from CBD
requesting that the Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle be listed as
threatened or endangered under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a June 4, 2015,
letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act. This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle
(Cicindela haemorrhagica arizonae). Because the petition does not
present substantial information indicating that listing the Arizona
wetsalts tiger beetle may be warranted, we are not initiating a status
review of this species in response to this petition. The basis and
scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at
https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2016-0027 under
the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public
submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the
status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see
Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To List Bezy's Night Lizard as an Endangered
or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2015-0076 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Bezy's night lizard (Xantusia bezyi): Arizona

Petition History

On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including
Bezy's night lizard, be listed under the Act as endangered or
threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). This finding addresses Bezy's night lizard.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for Bezy's night lizard (Xantusia bezyi).
Because the petition does not present substantial information
indicating that listing Bezy's night lizard may be warranted, we are
not initiating a status review of this species in response to this
petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2015-0076 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we
ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes
available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its
habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Cheoah Bald Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2015-0081 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Cheoah Bald salamander (Plethodon cheoah): North Carolina

Petition History

On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including
the Cheoah Bald salamander, be listed under the Act as endangered or
threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). This finding addresses the Cheoah Bald salamander.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present

[[Page 14064]]

substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted for the Cheoah Bald salamander
(Plethodon cheoah). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing the Cheoah Bald salamander may be
warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0081 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Chinese Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0012 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla): Himalayan foothills,
northern India; southern Bhutan; northeastern Bangladesh; northern Lao
PDR; southern China; Taiwan; Hong Kong SAR; northern Viet Nam;
northwest Thailand; and northern and western Myanmar

Petitions History

On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from Born
Free USA (BFUSA), CBD, Humane Society International (HSI), The Humane
Society of the United States (HSUS), and the International Fund for
Animal Welfare (IFAW), requesting that we list seven species of
pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M.
javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M.
crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M.
gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as
endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17,
2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act.
On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from
CBD, IFAW, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the same
seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda
pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian
pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground
pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of these species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The
requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section
4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla).

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Chinese pangolin
(Manis pentadactyla) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Cow Knob Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R5-ES-2015-0084 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Cow Knob (or white-spotted) salamander (Plethodon punctatus):
Virginia, West Virginia

Petition History

On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including
the Cow Knob (or white-spotted) salamander, be listed under the Act as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under
the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included
the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required
at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the Cow Knob salamander.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Cow Knob (or white-spotted) salamander
(Plethodon punctatus). Because the petition does not present
substantial information indicating that listing the Cow Knob salamander
may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species
in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R5-ES-2015-0084 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Deseret Milkvetch From the List
of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2016-0013 under the Supporting Documents section.

[[Page 14065]]

Species and Range

Deseret milkvetch (Astragalus desereticus): Utah

Petition History

We received a petition dated October 6, 2015, from Western Area
Power Administration requesting that Deseret milkvetch (currently
listed as threatened), be delisted under the Act due to new
information. The petition clearly identified itself as such and
included the requisite identification information for the petitioner,
required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action
(delisting) may be warranted for the Deseret milkvetch (Astragalus
desereticus), based on a lack of threats under any of the five listing
factors. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate
all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests information relevant to
whether the species falls within the definition of either an endangered
species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under
section 3(20), including information on the five listing factors under
section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see
Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Giant Ground Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0014 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Giant ground pangolin (Manis gigantean): Cameroon; Central African
Republic; Congo; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the; C[ocirc]te
d'Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea (Bioko, Equatorial Guinea (mainland));
Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Liberia; Senegal; Sierra Leone;
Tanzania, United Republic of; Uganda

Petitions History

On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA,
CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of
pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M.
javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M.
crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M.
gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as
endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17,
2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act.
On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from
CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the
same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla),
Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis),
Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant
ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of these species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The
requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section
4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the giant ground pangolin (Manis gigantean).

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the giant ground
pangolin (Manis gigantean) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D,
and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate
all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other the factors identified in
this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Indian Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0015 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata): Bangladesh; India; Nepal;
Pakistan; Sri Lanka

Petitions History

[[Page 14066]]

pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of the species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The
requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section
4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the Indian pangolin (Manis crassicaudata).

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Indian pangolin
(Manis crassicaudata) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Leoncita False-Foxglove as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0016 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Leoncita false-foxglove (Agalinis calycina): New Mexico, Texas;
Mexico

Petition History

On September 19, 2012, we received a petition dated September 6,
2012, from The Native Plant Society of New Mexico requesting that
Leoncita false-foxglove be listed as endangered and critical habitat be
designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a July
1, 2013, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed
the information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act. This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Leoncita false-
foxglove (Agalinis calycina) may be warranted, based on Factors A, D,
and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate
all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Long-tailed Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0017 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Long-tailed pangolin (Manis tetradactyla): Cameroon; Central
African Republic; Congo; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the;
C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea (Equatorial Guinea (mainland));
Gabon; Ghana; Liberia; Nigeria; Sierra Leone

Petitions History

On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA,
CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of
pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M.
javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M.
crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M.
gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as
endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17,
2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act.
On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from
CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the
same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla),
Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis),
Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant
ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of the species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioners, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The
requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section
4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the long-tailed pangolin (Manis
tetradactyla).

[[Page 14067]]

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the long-tailed pangolin
(Manis tetradactyla) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List MacDougal's Yellowtops as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0033 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

MacDougal's Yellowtops (Flaveria macdougalii): Arizona

Petition History

On May 1, 2015, we received a petition dated May 1, 2015, from CBD,
Tara Easter, and Robin Silver requesting that MacDougal's yellowtops
(Flaveria macdougalii) be emergency listed as threatened or endangered
and critical habitat be designated for the species under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). Because the Act does not provide for petitions to emergency
list, we are considering it as a petition to list MacDougal's
yellowtops. However, we did consider the immediacy of possible threats
to the species and whether emergency listing may be necessary at this
time. In a June 4, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we
had reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find
that the petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7)
of the Act. This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for MacDougal's yellowtops (Flaveria
macdougalii). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing MacDougal's yellowtops may be
warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2016-0033 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Monito Skink as an Endangered or
Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2016-0034 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Monito skink (Spondylurus monitae): Puerto Rico

Petition History

On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11,
2014, from CBD requesting that the Culebra skink (Spondylurus
culebrae), Mona Skink (Spondylurus monae), Monito Skink (Spondylurus
Monitoe), Lesser Virgin Islands Skink (Spondylurus semitaeniatus),
Virgin Islands Bronze Skink (Spondylurus sloanii), Puerto Rican Skink
(Spondylurus nitidus), Greater Saint Croix Skink (Spondylurus
magnacruzae), Greater Virgin Islands Skink (Spondylurus spilonotus),
and Lesser Saint Croix Skink (Capitellum parvicruzae) be listed as
endangered and critical habitat be designated for these species under
the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included
the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required
at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email
on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses one of the nine species
identified in the petition: the Monito skink. The Culebra skink,
Greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin
Islands bronze skink, Greater Virgin Islands skink, and Lesser Saint
Croix skink were addressed in a separate finding, which was published
in the Federal Register on January 12, 2016 (81 FR 1368). We will
address the Lesser Virgin Islands skink in a separate evaluation. This
finding addresses the Monito skink.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Monito skink (Spondylurus monitae).
Because the petition does not present substantial information
indicating that listing the Monito skink may be warranted, we are not
initiating a status review of this species in response to this
petition. The basis and scientific support for this finding can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2016-0034 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we
ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes
available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its
habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To Remove Navasota Ladies-Tresses From the
List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0035 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Navasota ladies-tresses (Spiranthes parksii): Texas

Petition History

On May 26, 2015, we received a petition dated May 26, 2015, by
electronic mail, from American Stewards of Liberty and Dr. Steve W.
Carothers requesting that Navasota ladies-tresses be delisted under the
Act due to error in information. The petition clearly identified itself
as a petition and included the requisite identification information for
the petitioner, as required by 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses
the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the

[[Page 14068]]

petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for Navasota ladies-
tresses (Spiranthes parksii). Because the petition does not present
substantial information indicating that delisting Navasota ladies-
tresses may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this
species in response to this petition. The basis and scientific support
for this finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2016-0035 under the
Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to
us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of,
or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Patagonia Eyed Silkmoth as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0036 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Patagonia eyed silkmoth (Automeris patagoniensis): Arizona; Mexico

Petition History

On June 29, 2015, we received a petition dated June 17, 2015, from
Defenders of Wildlife and Patagonia Area Resource Alliance requesting
that the Patagonia eyed silkmoth be listed as threatened or endangered
and critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Patagonia eyed silkmoth (Automeris
patagoniensis). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing the Patagonia eyed silkmoth may be
warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2016-0036 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Philippine Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0018 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis): Philippines

Petitions History

On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA,
CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of
pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M.
javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M.
crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M.
gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as
endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17,
2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act.
On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from
CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the
same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla),
Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis),
Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant
ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of the species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioners, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioners, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The
requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section
4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis).

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Philippine pangolin
(Manis culionensis) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Reticulate Collared Lizard as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2015-0109 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Reticulate Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus reticulatus): Texas; Mexico

Petition History

On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including
the reticulate collared lizard, be listed under the Act as threatened
or endangered species and critical habitat

[[Page 14069]]

be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as
such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the reticulate collared lizard (Crotaphytus
reticulatus). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing the reticulate collared lizard may
be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2015-0109 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Rio Grande Chub as an Endangered
or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0019 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Rio Grande chub (Gila pandora): New Mexico, Texas.

Petition History

On September 30, 2013, we received a petition dated September 27,
2013, from Wild Earth Guardians requesting that the Rio Grande chub be
listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated
for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself
as such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Rio Grande chub
(Gila pandora) may be warranted, based on Factors A, C, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Rio Grande Sucker as an Endangered
or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0020 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Rio Grande sucker (Catostomus plebeius): Colorado, New Mexico;
Mexico.

Petition History

On October 3, 2014, we received a petition dated September 29,
2014, from WildEarth Guardians requesting that Rio Grande sucker (also
known as the Rio Grande mountain-sucker, or matelote del bravo) be
listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be designated
for this species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself
as such and included the requisite identification information for the
petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the
petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Rio Grande sucker
(Catostomus plebeius) may be warranted, based on Factors A, C, D, and
E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either
``endangered species'' under section 3(6) of the Act or ``threatened
species'' under section 3(20), including information on the five
listing factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified
in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews,
above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the South Mountain Gray-Cheeked
Salamander as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2015-0117 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander (Plethodon meridianus):
North Carolina.

Petition History

On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from
CBD requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including
the South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander, be listed under the Act as
endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under
the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included
the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required
at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the South Mountain gray-
cheeked salamander.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander
(Plethodon meridianus). Because the petition does not present
substantial information indicating that listing the South Mountain
gray-cheeked salamander may be warranted, we are not initiating a
status review of this species in response to this petition. The basis
and scientific support for this finding can be found as an appendix at
https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0117 under
the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public
submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the
status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see
Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

[[Page 14070]]

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Southern Dusky Salamander as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R4-ES-2016-0038 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Southern dusky salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus): Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Texas, Virginia.

Petition History

On April 2, 2015, we received a petition from the Coastal Plains
Institute and Land Conservancy requesting that southern dusky
salamander be listed as threatened under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information required at 50 CFR 424.14(a); however, it did not contain
copies of supporting documents. We acknowledged receipt of the petition
via email on April 22, 2015. Additional materials were received on June
10, 2015. This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted for the Southern dusky salamander (Desmognathus
auriculatus). Because the petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing the Southern dusky salamander may
be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in
response to this petition. The basis and scientific support for this
finding can be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2016-0038 under the Supporting Documents section.
However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that
becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species
or its habitat at any time (see Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher
From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2016-0039 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus):
California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, and Nevada, Texas;
winters in Central and South America.

Petition History

On August, 20, 2015, we received a petition dated August 19, 2015,
from The Pacific Legal Foundation (representing The Center for
Environmental Science, Accuracy, and Reliability; Building Industry
Legal Defense Fund; California Building Industry Association;
California Cattlemen's Association; New Mexico Business Coalition, New
Mexico Cattle Growers Association; New Mexico Farm and Livestock
Bureau; and New Mexico Wool Growers Inc.), requesting that the
southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) be delisted
due to error in information under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action
(delisting) may be warranted for the Southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus), based on information related to taxonomic
status. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate
all potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Sunda Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0021 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica): Brunei Darussalam; Cambodia;
Indonesia; Lao People's Democratic Republic; Malaysia; Myanmar;
Singapore; Thailand; Viet Nam.

Petitions History

On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA,
CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of
pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M.
javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M.
crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M.
gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as
endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17,
2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act.
On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from
CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the
same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla),
Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis),
Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant
ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of the species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a

[[Page 14071]]

single 90-day finding for each species. The requested action for
listing based on similarity of appearance (section 4(e)) will be
considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica).

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the Sunda pangolin
(Manis javanica) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of Two Petitions To List the Tree Pangolin Under the
Endangered Species Act

Additional information regarding our review of these petitions can
be found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-HQ-ES-2016-0022 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Tree pangolin (Manis tricuspis): Angola (Angola); Benin; Cameroon;
Central African Republic; Congo; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the;
C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire; Equatorial Guinea (Bioko, Equatorial Guinea
(mainland)); Gabon; Ghana; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Kenya; Liberia;
Nigeria; Rwanda; Sierra Leone; South Sudan; Tanzania, United Republic
of; Togo; Uganda; Zambia.

Petitions History

On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a petition from BFUSA,
CBD, HSI, HSUS, and IFAW requesting that we list seven species of
pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda pangolin (M.
javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis), Indian pangolin (M.
crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant ground pangolin (M.
gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M. tetradactyla)) as
endangered species under the Act. The petition clearly identified
itself as such and included the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 17,
2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we had reviewed the
information presented in the petition and did not find that the
petition warranted an emergency listing under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act.
On July 15, 2015, we electronically received a second petition from
CBD, IFAW, HSI, HSUS, and BFUSA requesting that the Service list the
same seven species of pangolin (Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla),
Sunda pangolin (M. javanica), Philippine pangolin (M. culionensis),
Indian pangolin (M. crassicaudata), tree pangolin (M. tricuspis), giant
ground pangolin (M. gigantean), and the long-tailed pangolin (M.
tetradactyla)) as an endangered species under the similarity of
appearance provisions of the Act (section 4(e)), based upon the
petitioners' claim of the species' similarity of appearance to the
currently listed Temminck's ground pangolin (Manis temminckii). The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). In an August 17, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we
responded that we had reviewed the information presented in the
petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency
listing under section 4(b)(7) of the Act.
As both petitions address the seven unlisted species of pangolin,
we are combining the petitioned actions (listing each species as either
threatened or endangered either based on the five factors under section
4(a)(1) of the Act or due to a similarity of appearance under section
4(e) of the Act) into a single 90-day finding for each species. The
requested action for listing based on similarity of appearance (section
4(e)) will be considered under Factor E of each finding.
This finding addresses the tree pangolin (Manis tricuspis).

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the tree pangolin (Manis
tricuspis) may be warranted based on Factors A, B, D, and E. However,
during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential
threats to the species, including the extent to which any protections
or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats. Thus, for
this species, the Service requests any information relevant to whether
the species falls within the definition of either an endangered species
under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened species under section
3(20), including information on the five listing factors under section
4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this finding (see Request
for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Western Bumble Bee as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R6-ES-2016-0023 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Western bumble bee (Bombus occidentalis): Alaska, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North
Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, Wyoming, Utah; Canada:
Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Yukon Territory.

Petition History

On September 21, 2015, we received a petition dated September 15,
2015, from Defenders of Wildlife requesting that the western bumble bee
be listed as threatened or endangered and critical habitat be
designated for this species under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included the requisite identification
information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This
finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the western bumble bee
(Bombus occidentalis) may be warranted, based on Factors C, D, and E.
However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for the western bumble bee, the Service requests any information
relevant to whether the species falls within the definition of either
an endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this

[[Page 14072]]

finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Evaluation of a Petition To List the Yellow-Banded Bumble Bee as an
Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act

Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be
found as an appendix at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS-R5-ES-2016-0024 under the Supporting Documents section.

Species and Range

Yellow-banded bumble bee (Bombus terricola): Connecticut, Kentucky,
Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota,
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont,
Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin; Canada: Alberta, British Columbia,
Manitoba, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan.

Petition History

On September 15, 2015, we received a petition dated September 15,
2015, from Defenders of Wildlife requesting that the yellow-banded
bumble bee (Bombus terricola) be listed as threatened or endangered and
critical habitat be designated for this species under the Act. The
petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition.

Finding

Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that listing the yellow-banded bumble
bee (Bombus terricola) may be warranted, based on Factors A, C, D, and
E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all
potential threats to the species, including the extent to which any
protections or other conservation efforts have reduced those threats.
Thus, for this species, the Service requests any information relevant
to whether the species falls within the definition of either an
endangered species under section 3(6) of the Act or a threatened
species under section 3(20), including information on the five listing
factors under section 4(a)(1) and any other factors identified in this
finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above).

Conclusion

On the basis of our evaluation of the information presented in the
petitions under section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have determined that
the petitions summarized above for the acuna cacus, Arizona night
lizard, Arizona wetsalts tiger beetle, Bezy's night lizard, Cheoah Bald
salamander, Cow Knob salamander, MacDougal's yellowtops, Monito skink,
Navasota ladies-tresses, Patagonia eyed silkmoth, reticulate collared
lizard, South Mountain gray-cheeked salamander, and southern dusky
salamander do not present substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the requested actions may be warranted.
Therefore, we are not initiating status reviews for these species.
The petitions summarized above for the African elephant, American
burying beetle, Chinese pangolin, deseret milkvetch, giant ground
pangolin, Indian pangolin, Leoncita false-foxglove, long-tailed
pangolin, Philippine pangolin, Rio Grande chub, Rio Grande sucker,
Sunda pangolin, tree pangolin, southwestern willow flycatcher, western
bumble bee, and yellow-banded bumble bee present substantial scientific
or commercial information indicating that the requested actions may be
warranted.
Because we have found that these petitions present substantial
information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted, we
are initiating status reviews to determine whether these actions under
the Act are warranted. At the conclusion of each status review, we will
issue a finding, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as
to whether or not the Service finds that the petitioned action is
warranted.
It is important to note that the standard for a 90-day finding
differs from the Act's standard that applies to a status review to
determine whether a petitioned action is warranted. In making a 90-day
finding, we consider only the information in the petition and in our
files, and we evaluate merely whether that information constitutes
``substantial information'' indicating that the petitioned action ``may
be warranted.'' In a 12-month finding, we must complete a thorough
status review of the species and evaluate the ``best scientific and
commercial data available'' to determine whether a petitioned action
``is warranted.'' Because the Act's standards for 90-day and 12-month
findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that
the 12-month finding will result in a ``warranted'' finding.

References Cited

A complete list of references cited is available on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the appropriate lead
field offices (contact the person listed under Table 3 in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).

Authors

The primary authors of this notice are staff members of the
Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Authority

The authority for these actions is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Dated: February 24, 2016.
Stephen Guertin,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05699 Filed 3-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.