Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Airplanes, 13301-13303 [2016-05606]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–4223; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–108–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Model GV and GV–SP airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a new
revision to the airworthiness limitations
of the maintenance planning document
based on fatigue and damage tolerance
testing, and updated analysis. This
proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance or inspection program to
update inspection requirements and life
limits that address fatigue cracking of
principal structural elements (PSEs). We
are proposing this AD to ensure fatigue
cracking of PSEs is detected and
corrected; such fatigue cracking could
result in reduced structural integrity of
the PSEs and critical components.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation, Technical
Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206,
Savannah, GA 31402–2206; telephone:
800–810–4853; fax: 912–965–3520;
email: pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet:
https://www.gulfstream.com/product_
support/technical_pubs/pubs/
index.htm. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
13301
98057–3356. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
could result in reduced structural
integrity of the PSEs and critical
components.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
4223; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald Wissing, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College
Park, GA 30337; phone: 404–474–5552;
fax: 404–474–5606; email:
ronald.wissing@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Gulfstream Document
GV–GER–9973, Summary of Changes to
the GV Series Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision C, dated January
8, 2015. The service information
describes inspection requirements and
life limits that address fatigue cracking
of the PSEs. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2016–4223; Directorate Identifier 2015–
NM–108–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a new revision to the
airworthiness limitations of the
maintenance planning document based
on fatigue and damage tolerance testing,
and updated analysis. The airworthiness
limitations of the maintenance planning
document update inspection
requirements and life limits that address
fatigue cracking of PSEs. We determined
that these actions are necessary to
address the identified unsafe condition.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in fatigue cracking of PSEs, which
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
revising the maintenance or inspection
program to update inspection
requirements and life limits to detect
fatigue cracking of PSEs.
This proposed AD would require
revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections). Compliance
with these actions is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired
in the areas addressed by this AD, the
operator may not be able to accomplish
the actions described in the revisions. In
this situation, to comply with 14 CFR
91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) according to
paragraph (i) of this AD. The request
should include a description of changes
to the required actions that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the
airplane.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the Service Information
Section 4.0, ‘‘Excluded Aircraft Due to
Special Operation or Modifications,’’ of
Gulfstream Document GV–GER–9973,
Summary of Changes to the GV Series
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C,
dated January 8, 2015, states that aircraft
on which the listed supplemental type
certificates (STCs) have been
accomplished are excluded from the
effectivity of that document. However,
we have determined that these airplanes
could have inspections and limits
specified in Gulfstream Document GV–
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
13302
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
GER–9973, Summary of Changes to the
GV Series Airworthiness Limitations,
Revision C, dated January 8, 2015, that
are applicable and, therefore, those
airplanes are included in the
applicability of this proposed AD. The
referenced STCs provide a specific
airworthiness limitation section (ALS).
An operator that has one of these STCs
installed may be able to review their
installation and the ALS revisions being
mandated, and develop an alternate
program. The alternate program may be
submitted for approval as an AMOC
under the provisions of paragraph (i) of
this proposed AD. We have coordinated
this difference with Gulfstream.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 392 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Revise the maintenance or inspection program ......
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...............
$0
$85
$33,320.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation: Docket
No. FAA–2016–4223; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–108–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 28,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation Model GV airplanes, serial
numbers 501 through 693 inclusive and
serial number 699; and Model GV–SP
airplanes, serial numbers 5001 through 5433
inclusive; certificated in any category.
such fatigue cracking could result in reduced
structural integrity of the PSEs and critical
components.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Revise Maintenance or Inspection
Program
Within 12 months after the effective date
of this AD, revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the airworthiness limitations
specified in Gulfstream Document GV–GER–
9973, Summary of Changes to the GV Series
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C, dated
January 8, 2015. The initial compliance times
for the tasks identified in Gulfstream
Document GV–GER–9973, Summary of
Changes to the GV Series Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision C, dated January 8,
2015, are at the applicable times specified in
Gulfstream Document GV–GER–9973,
Summary of Changes to the GV Series
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C, dated
January 8, 2015, or within twelve months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: For
Model GV airplanes, the airplane
maintenance manual (AMM) is currently at
Revision 43, dated February 15, 2015. For
Model GV–SP airplanes, the G500 AMM is
currently at Revision 24, dated February 15,
2015, and the G550 AMM is currently at
Revision 24, dated February 15, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32, Landing Gear; 53,
Fuselage; 54, Nacelles/Pylons; 55, Stabilizers;
and 57, Wings.
(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a new revision
to the airworthiness limitations of the
maintenance planning document based on
fatigue and damage tolerance testing, and
updated analysis. We are issuing this AD to
ensure fatigue cracking of principal structural
elements (PSEs) is detected and corrected;
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Ronald Wissing, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
GA 30337; phone: 404–474–5552; fax: 404–
474–5606; email: ronald.wissing@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation, Technical Publications Dept.,
P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, GA 31402–2206;
telephone: 800–810–4853; fax: 912–965–
3520; email: pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet:
https://www.gulfstream.com/product_
support/technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, WA, on March 3, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05606 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0559; Directorate
Identifier 2008–SW–66–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The FAA is withdrawing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
The NPRM proposed a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Sikorsky Model S–92A helicopters. The
proposed action would have required
revising the Limitations section of the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to
clarify that the Model S–92A helicopter
was certificated as a transport category
rotorcraft in both Categories A and B
with different operating limitations for
each category and must be operated
accordingly. Since we issued the NPRM,
we have determined that operating the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Mar 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
As of March 14, 2016, the
proposed rule to amend 14 CFR part 39
published June 19, 2009 (74 FR 29148)
is withdrawn.
DATES:
John
Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, FAA, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803; telephone (781)
238–7173; email john.coffey@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 to
add a new AD (74 FR 29148, June 19,
2009) for Sikorsky Model S–92A
helicopters. The NPRM proposed to
require revising the Limitations section
of the RFM by clarifying that the Model
S–92A helicopter was certificated as a
transport category rotorcraft in both
Categories A and B with different
operating limitations for each category
and must be operated accordingly.
When the Model S–92A is configured
with 10 or more passenger seats, it is a
Category A helicopter, and operators
must follow the limitations for Category
A. When it is configured with 9 or fewer
passenger seats, it may be considered a
Category B helicopter, and operators
may follow the less stringent Category B
limitations. At the time the NPRM was
published, the limitation language in
the RFM did not make a clear
distinction between Category A and
Category B based on the seating
configuration. The proposed actions
were intended to prevent operating
under less stringent requirements.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Actions Since NPRM (74 FR 29148,
June 19, 2009) Was Issued
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky)
Helicopters
SUMMARY:
helicopter in Category B with 10 or
more passenger seats is not an unsafe
condition but an inconsistency with 14
CFR 29.1(c). Accordingly, we withdraw
the proposed rule.
Since we issued the NPRM (74 FR
29148, June 19, 2009), one commenter
noted the proposed AD misinterprets
certification rules as operational rules.
We considered the comment and reevaluated the details that went into the
determination of the unsafe condition
for this concern. We determined that
operating the helicopter in Category B
with 10 or more passengers is not an
unsafe condition, and the associated
level of risk does not warrant AD action.
Rather, this was an inconsistency with
14 CFR 29.1(c). Sikorsky has since
revised the RFM to clarify that a
helicopter configured with a maximum
of 19 passenger seats must be operated
as a Category A but if configured with
9 or fewer passenger seats may be
operated as a Category B. This action
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13303
mitigates the inconsistency with 14 CFR
29.1(c).
Withdrawal of the NPRM constitutes
only such action and does not preclude
the agency from issuing another notice
in the future nor does it commit the
agency to any course of action in the
future.
Since this action only withdraws an
NPRM, it is neither a proposed nor a
final rule; therefore, it is not covered
under Executive Order 12866, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking, Docket No. FAA–2009–
0559; Directorate Identifier 2008–SW–
66–AD, published in the Federal
Register on June 19, 2009 (74 FR 29148),
is withdrawn.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 4,
2016.
Scott A. Horn,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05517 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 140207122–4122–01]
RIN 0648–BD97
Withdrawal of Hawaiian Islands
Humpback Whale National Marine
Sanctuary Proposed Regulations
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), Department of Commerce
(DOC).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
AGENCY:
This action withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
published in the Federal Register on
March 26, 2015 (80 FR 16224), to amend
the regulations for the Hawaiian Islands
Humpback Whale National Marine
Sanctuary (HIHWNMS or sanctuary)
and to revise the sanctuary’s terms of
designation and management plan.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13301-13303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05606]
[[Page 13301]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-4223; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-108-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GV and GV-SP airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a new revision to the airworthiness
limitations of the maintenance planning document based on fatigue and
damage tolerance testing, and updated analysis. This proposed AD would
require revising the maintenance or inspection program to update
inspection requirements and life limits that address fatigue cracking
of principal structural elements (PSEs). We are proposing this AD to
ensure fatigue cracking of PSEs is detected and corrected; such fatigue
cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the PSEs and
critical components.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation, Technical Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206,
Savannah, GA 31402-2206; telephone: 800-810-4853; fax: 912-965-3520;
email: pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet: https://www.gulfstream.com/product_support/technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
4223; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Wissing, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474-
5552; fax: 404-474-5606; email: ronald.wissing@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-4223;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-108-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received a new revision to the airworthiness limitations of the
maintenance planning document based on fatigue and damage tolerance
testing, and updated analysis. The airworthiness limitations of the
maintenance planning document update inspection requirements and life
limits that address fatigue cracking of PSEs. We determined that these
actions are necessary to address the identified unsafe condition. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in fatigue cracking of PSEs,
which could result in reduced structural integrity of the PSEs and
critical components.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Gulfstream Document GV-GER-9973, Summary of Changes to
the GV Series Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C, dated January 8,
2015. The service information describes inspection requirements and
life limits that address fatigue cracking of the PSEs. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require revising the maintenance or
inspection program to update inspection requirements and life limits to
detect fatigue cracking of PSEs.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this AD, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this situation,
to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) according to paragraph (i)
of this AD. The request should include a description of changes to the
required actions that will ensure the continued operational safety of
the airplane.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
Section 4.0, ``Excluded Aircraft Due to Special Operation or
Modifications,'' of Gulfstream Document GV-GER-9973, Summary of Changes
to the GV Series Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C, dated January
8, 2015, states that aircraft on which the listed supplemental type
certificates (STCs) have been accomplished are excluded from the
effectivity of that document. However, we have determined that these
airplanes could have inspections and limits specified in Gulfstream
Document GV-
[[Page 13302]]
GER-9973, Summary of Changes to the GV Series Airworthiness
Limitations, Revision C, dated January 8, 2015, that are applicable
and, therefore, those airplanes are included in the applicability of
this proposed AD. The referenced STCs provide a specific airworthiness
limitation section (ALS). An operator that has one of these STCs
installed may be able to review their installation and the ALS
revisions being mandated, and develop an alternate program. The
alternate program may be submitted for approval as an AMOC under the
provisions of paragraph (i) of this proposed AD. We have coordinated
this difference with Gulfstream.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 392 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revise the maintenance or inspection 1 work-hour x $85 per hour $0 $85 $33,320.
program. = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation: Docket No. FAA-2016-4223;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-108-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 28, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GV
airplanes, serial numbers 501 through 693 inclusive and serial
number 699; and Model GV-SP airplanes, serial numbers 5001 through
5433 inclusive; certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
Gear; 53, Fuselage; 54, Nacelles/Pylons; 55, Stabilizers; and 57,
Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a new revision to the airworthiness
limitations of the maintenance planning document based on fatigue
and damage tolerance testing, and updated analysis. We are issuing
this AD to ensure fatigue cracking of principal structural elements
(PSEs) is detected and corrected; such fatigue cracking could result
in reduced structural integrity of the PSEs and critical components.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Revise Maintenance or Inspection Program
Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the
airworthiness limitations specified in Gulfstream Document GV-GER-
9973, Summary of Changes to the GV Series Airworthiness Limitations,
Revision C, dated January 8, 2015. The initial compliance times for
the tasks identified in Gulfstream Document GV-GER-9973, Summary of
Changes to the GV Series Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C,
dated January 8, 2015, are at the applicable times specified in
Gulfstream Document GV-GER-9973, Summary of Changes to the GV Series
Airworthiness Limitations, Revision C, dated January 8, 2015, or
within twelve months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: For Model GV airplanes, the
airplane maintenance manual (AMM) is currently at Revision 43, dated
February 15, 2015. For Model GV-SP airplanes, the G500 AMM is
currently at Revision 24, dated February 15, 2015, and the G550 AMM
is currently at Revision 24, dated February 15, 2015.
(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
[[Page 13303]]
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph
(j)(1) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Ronald Wissing,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta ACO,
1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474-5552;
fax: 404-474-5606; email: ronald.wissing@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Technical Publications Dept., P.O.
Box 2206, Savannah, GA 31402-2206; telephone: 800-810-4853; fax:
912-965-3520; email: pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet: https://www.gulfstream.com/product_support/technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, WA, on March 3, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05606 Filed 3-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P