Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund, 12851-12852 [2016-05555]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
evaluate interference with maintenance.
We found no monitors violating the one
hour NO2 NAAQS in these previous
periods, as well. Further, monitored
values are well below 100 ppb in states
bordering Oregon—63 ppb was the
highest design value for 2012 through
2014, at the Los Angeles, California,
monitor.
We also reviewed provisions in the
Federally-approved Oregon SIP
designed to control emissions of NOX—
of which NO2 is a subset. Oregon
generally regulates emissions of NOX
through its pre-construction permitting
and operating permit regulations.
Oregon’s pre-construction permitting
rules are found at Oregon
Administrative Rules Chapter 340,
Division 224—New Source Review.
Oregon’s Federally-enforceable state
operating permit program is found at
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter
340, Division 216—Air Contaminant
Discharge Permits. These rules are
designed ensure that new or modified
stationary sources will not cause or
contribute to a violation of the
applicable NAAQS.
Based on the Oregon submittal and
our review of more recent monitoring
data and provisions in the Oregon SIP,
we believe it is reasonable to conclude
that Oregon emissions will not
significantly contribute to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2010 one hour NO2
NAAQS in any other state. We are
proposing to approve the Oregon SIP as
meeting the requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010
one hour NO2 NAAQS.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Proposed Action
We are proposing to approve the
Oregon submittal for the purposes of
meeting CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
interstate transport requirements for the
2008 Pb and 2010 one hour NO2
NAAQS. We intend to address the
remainder of the submittal with respect
to the 2010 one hour sulfur dioxide and
2012 annual fine particulate matter
NAAQS in separate, future actions.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Mar 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
it does not involve technical standards;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12851
Dated: March 2, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2016–05557 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
42 CFR Part 136
[RIN 0905AC97]
Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund
Indian Health Service, HHS.
Notice; extension of the
comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document extends the
comment period for the Catastrophic
Health Emergency Fund (CHEF) notice
of proposed rulemaking which was
published in the Federal Register on
January 26, 2016. The comment period
for the notice, which would have ended
on March 11, 2016, is extended by 60
days.
DATES: The comment period for the
notice published in the January 26, 2016
Federal Register (81 FR 4239) is
extended to May 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Because of staff and
resource limitations, we cannot accept
comments by facsimile transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
written comments on this regulation to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations
Officer, Indian Health Service, Office of
Management Services, Division of
Regulatory Affairs, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Mailstop 09E70, Rockville, Maryland
20857.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
above address.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to the address
above. If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Rockville address,
please call telephone number (301) 443–
1116 in advance to schedule your
arrival with a staff member.
Comments will be made available for
public inspection at the Rockville
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
12852
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
address from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
Monday–Friday, approximately two
weeks after publication of this notice.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Ms.
Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, Office of
Resource Access and Partnerships,
Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Mailstop 10E85C, Rockville,
Maryland 20857. Telephone: (301) 443–
1553.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The notice
that was published in the Federal
Register on January 26, 2016 advises the
public that the Indian Health Service
proposes to (1) establish definitions
governing the CHEF, including
definitions of disasters and catastrophic
illnesses; (2) establish that a Service
Unit shall not be eligible for
reimbursement for the cost of treatment
from CHEF until its cost of treating any
victim of such catastrophic illness or
disaster has reached a certain threshold
cost; (3) establish a procedure for
reimbursement of the portion of the
costs for authorized services that exceed
such threshold costs; (4) establish a
procedure for payment from CHEF for
cases in which the exigencies of the
medical circumstances warrant
treatment prior to the authorization of
such treatment; and (5) establish a
procedure that will ensure no payment
will be made from CHEF to a Service
Unit to the extent the provider of
services is eligible to receive payment
from any other Federal, State, local, or
private source of reimbursement for
which the patient is eligible.
This comment period is being
extended to allow all interested parties
the opportunity to comment on the
proposed rule. Therefore, we are
extending the comment period until
May 10, 2016.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 4, 2016.
Elizabeth Fowler,
Deputy Director for Management Operations
Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05555 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Mar 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 595
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0031]
RIN 2127–AL67
Make Inoperative Exemptions; Vehicle
Modifications To Accommodate People
With Disabilities, Roof Crush
Resistance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This NPRM proposes to
amend 49 CFR part 595, subpart C,
‘‘Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle
Modifications to Accommodate People
With Disabilities,’’ to include a new
exemption relating to the Federal motor
vehicle safety standard for roof crush
resistance. The exemption would
facilitate the mobility of physically
disabled drivers and passengers. This
document responds to a petition from
Autoregs Consulting, Inc. on behalf of
The National Mobility Equipment
Dealers Association.
DATES: You should submit your
comments early enough to ensure that
the Docket receives them not later than
May 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the docket number identified in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the Supplementary Information section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
For access to the docket to read
background documents or comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher J. Wiacek, NHTSA Office of
Crash Avoidance Standards, NVS–122
(telephone 202–366–4801) (fax 202–
493–2739), or Jesse Chang, NHTSA
Office of Chief Counsel, NCC–112
(telephone 202–366–2992) (fax 202–
366–3820). The mailing address for
these officials is: National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Traffic and Motor
Vehicle Safety Act (49 U.S.C. chapter
301) (‘‘Safety Act’’) and NHTSA’s
regulations require vehicle
manufacturers to certify that their
vehicles comply with all applicable
Federal motor vehicle safety standards
(FMVSSs) (see 49 U.S.C. 30112; 49 CFR
part 567). A vehicle manufacturer,
distributor, dealer, or repair business
generally may not knowingly make
inoperative any part of a device or
element of design installed in or on a
motor vehicle in compliance with an
applicable FMVSS (see 49 U.S.C.
30122). NHTSA has the authority to
issue regulations that exempt regulated
entities from the ‘‘make inoperative’’
provision (49 U.S.C. 30122(c)). The
agency has used that authority to
promulgate 49 CFR part 595 subpart C,
‘‘Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle
Modifications to Accommodate People
with Disabilities.’’
49 CFR part 595 subpart C sets forth
exemptions from the make inoperative
provision to permit, under limited
circumstances, vehicle modifications
that take the vehicles out of compliance
with certain FMVSSs when the vehicles
are modified to be used by persons with
disabilities after the first retail sale of
the vehicle for purposes other than
resale. The regulation was promulgated
to facilitate the modification of motor
vehicles so that persons with disabilities
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12851-12852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05555]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
42 CFR Part 136
[RIN 0905AC97]
Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund
AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; extension of the comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document extends the comment period for the Catastrophic
Health Emergency Fund (CHEF) notice of proposed rulemaking which was
published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2016. The comment
period for the notice, which would have ended on March 11, 2016, is
extended by 60 days.
DATES: The comment period for the notice published in the January 26,
2016 Federal Register (81 FR 4239) is extended to May 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept
comments by facsimile transmission. You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit written comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
Comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations Officer, Indian Health Service,
Office of Management Services, Division of Regulatory Affairs, 5600
Fishers Lane, Mailstop 09E70, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the above address.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period
to the address above. If you intend to deliver your comments to the
Rockville address, please call telephone number (301) 443-1116 in
advance to schedule your arrival with a staff member.
Comments will be made available for public inspection at the
Rockville
[[Page 12852]]
address from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday-Friday, approximately two
weeks after publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Terri Schmidt, Acting Director,
Office of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 5600
Fishers Lane, Mailstop 10E85C, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone:
(301) 443-1553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice that was published in the Federal
Register on January 26, 2016 advises the public that the Indian Health
Service proposes to (1) establish definitions governing the CHEF,
including definitions of disasters and catastrophic illnesses; (2)
establish that a Service Unit shall not be eligible for reimbursement
for the cost of treatment from CHEF until its cost of treating any
victim of such catastrophic illness or disaster has reached a certain
threshold cost; (3) establish a procedure for reimbursement of the
portion of the costs for authorized services that exceed such threshold
costs; (4) establish a procedure for payment from CHEF for cases in
which the exigencies of the medical circumstances warrant treatment
prior to the authorization of such treatment; and (5) establish a
procedure that will ensure no payment will be made from CHEF to a
Service Unit to the extent the provider of services is eligible to
receive payment from any other Federal, State, local, or private source
of reimbursement for which the patient is eligible.
This comment period is being extended to allow all interested
parties the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. Therefore, we
are extending the comment period until May 10, 2016.
Dated: March 4, 2016.
Elizabeth Fowler,
Deputy Director for Management Operations Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05555 Filed 3-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-P
