Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund, 12851-12852 [2016-05555]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules evaluate interference with maintenance. We found no monitors violating the one hour NO2 NAAQS in these previous periods, as well. Further, monitored values are well below 100 ppb in states bordering Oregon—63 ppb was the highest design value for 2012 through 2014, at the Los Angeles, California, monitor. We also reviewed provisions in the Federally-approved Oregon SIP designed to control emissions of NOX— of which NO2 is a subset. Oregon generally regulates emissions of NOX through its pre-construction permitting and operating permit regulations. Oregon’s pre-construction permitting rules are found at Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 340, Division 224—New Source Review. Oregon’s Federally-enforceable state operating permit program is found at Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 340, Division 216—Air Contaminant Discharge Permits. These rules are designed ensure that new or modified stationary sources will not cause or contribute to a violation of the applicable NAAQS. Based on the Oregon submittal and our review of more recent monitoring data and provisions in the Oregon SIP, we believe it is reasonable to conclude that Oregon emissions will not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2010 one hour NO2 NAAQS in any other state. We are proposing to approve the Oregon SIP as meeting the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 one hour NO2 NAAQS. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS IV. Proposed Action We are proposing to approve the Oregon submittal for the purposes of meeting CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) interstate transport requirements for the 2008 Pb and 2010 one hour NO2 NAAQS. We intend to address the remainder of the submittal with respect to the 2010 one hour sulfur dioxide and 2012 annual fine particulate matter NAAQS in separate, future actions. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Mar 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because it does not involve technical standards; and • does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 12851 Dated: March 2, 2016. Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator, Region 10. [FR Doc. 2016–05557 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Indian Health Service 42 CFR Part 136 [RIN 0905AC97] Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund Indian Health Service, HHS. Notice; extension of the comment period. AGENCY: ACTION: This document extends the comment period for the Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund (CHEF) notice of proposed rulemaking which was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2016. The comment period for the notice, which would have ended on March 11, 2016, is extended by 60 days. DATES: The comment period for the notice published in the January 26, 2016 Federal Register (81 FR 4239) is extended to May 10, 2016. ADDRESSES: Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile transmission. You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one of the ways listed): 1. Electronically. You may submit written comments on this regulation to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ instructions. 2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations Officer, Indian Health Service, Office of Management Services, Division of Regulatory Affairs, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mailstop 09E70, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment period. 3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to the above address. 4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period to the address above. If you intend to deliver your comments to the Rockville address, please call telephone number (301) 443– 1116 in advance to schedule your arrival with a staff member. Comments will be made available for public inspection at the Rockville SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM 11MRP1 12852 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules address from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday–Friday, approximately two weeks after publication of this notice. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Ms. Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, Office of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mailstop 10E85C, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: (301) 443– 1553. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The notice that was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2016 advises the public that the Indian Health Service proposes to (1) establish definitions governing the CHEF, including definitions of disasters and catastrophic illnesses; (2) establish that a Service Unit shall not be eligible for reimbursement for the cost of treatment from CHEF until its cost of treating any victim of such catastrophic illness or disaster has reached a certain threshold cost; (3) establish a procedure for reimbursement of the portion of the costs for authorized services that exceed such threshold costs; (4) establish a procedure for payment from CHEF for cases in which the exigencies of the medical circumstances warrant treatment prior to the authorization of such treatment; and (5) establish a procedure that will ensure no payment will be made from CHEF to a Service Unit to the extent the provider of services is eligible to receive payment from any other Federal, State, local, or private source of reimbursement for which the patient is eligible. This comment period is being extended to allow all interested parties the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. Therefore, we are extending the comment period until May 10, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: March 4, 2016. Elizabeth Fowler, Deputy Director for Management Operations Indian Health Service. [FR Doc. 2016–05555 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am] asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS BILLING CODE 4165–16–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Mar 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 595 [Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0031] RIN 2127–AL67 Make Inoperative Exemptions; Vehicle Modifications To Accommodate People With Disabilities, Roof Crush Resistance National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: This NPRM proposes to amend 49 CFR part 595, subpart C, ‘‘Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle Modifications to Accommodate People With Disabilities,’’ to include a new exemption relating to the Federal motor vehicle safety standard for roof crush resistance. The exemption would facilitate the mobility of physically disabled drivers and passengers. This document responds to a petition from Autoregs Consulting, Inc. on behalf of The National Mobility Equipment Dealers Association. DATES: You should submit your comments early enough to ensure that the Docket receives them not later than May 10, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the docket number identified in the heading of this document by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. • Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • Fax: 202–493–2251. Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78). For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov or the street address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher J. Wiacek, NHTSA Office of Crash Avoidance Standards, NVS–122 (telephone 202–366–4801) (fax 202– 493–2739), or Jesse Chang, NHTSA Office of Chief Counsel, NCC–112 (telephone 202–366–2992) (fax 202– 366–3820). The mailing address for these officials is: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (49 U.S.C. chapter 301) (‘‘Safety Act’’) and NHTSA’s regulations require vehicle manufacturers to certify that their vehicles comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSSs) (see 49 U.S.C. 30112; 49 CFR part 567). A vehicle manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or repair business generally may not knowingly make inoperative any part of a device or element of design installed in or on a motor vehicle in compliance with an applicable FMVSS (see 49 U.S.C. 30122). NHTSA has the authority to issue regulations that exempt regulated entities from the ‘‘make inoperative’’ provision (49 U.S.C. 30122(c)). The agency has used that authority to promulgate 49 CFR part 595 subpart C, ‘‘Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle Modifications to Accommodate People with Disabilities.’’ 49 CFR part 595 subpart C sets forth exemptions from the make inoperative provision to permit, under limited circumstances, vehicle modifications that take the vehicles out of compliance with certain FMVSSs when the vehicles are modified to be used by persons with disabilities after the first retail sale of the vehicle for purposes other than resale. The regulation was promulgated to facilitate the modification of motor vehicles so that persons with disabilities E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM 11MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12851-12852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05555]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service

42 CFR Part 136

[RIN 0905AC97]


Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund

AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; extension of the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document extends the comment period for the Catastrophic 
Health Emergency Fund (CHEF) notice of proposed rulemaking which was 
published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2016. The comment 
period for the notice, which would have ended on March 11, 2016, is 
extended by 60 days.

DATES: The comment period for the notice published in the January 26, 
2016 Federal Register (81 FR 4239) is extended to May 10, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept 
comments by facsimile transmission. You may submit comments in one of 
four ways (please choose only one of the ways listed):
    1. Electronically. You may submit written comments on this 
regulation to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a 
Comment'' instructions.
    2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following 
address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations Officer, Indian Health Service, 
Office of Management Services, Division of Regulatory Affairs, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Mailstop 09E70, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
    Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received 
before the close of the comment period.
    3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to 
the above address.
    4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or 
courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period 
to the address above. If you intend to deliver your comments to the 
Rockville address, please call telephone number (301) 443-1116 in 
advance to schedule your arrival with a staff member.
    Comments will be made available for public inspection at the 
Rockville

[[Page 12852]]

address from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday-Friday, approximately two 
weeks after publication of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Terri Schmidt, Acting Director, 
Office of Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Mailstop 10E85C, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: 
(301) 443-1553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice that was published in the Federal 
Register on January 26, 2016 advises the public that the Indian Health 
Service proposes to (1) establish definitions governing the CHEF, 
including definitions of disasters and catastrophic illnesses; (2) 
establish that a Service Unit shall not be eligible for reimbursement 
for the cost of treatment from CHEF until its cost of treating any 
victim of such catastrophic illness or disaster has reached a certain 
threshold cost; (3) establish a procedure for reimbursement of the 
portion of the costs for authorized services that exceed such threshold 
costs; (4) establish a procedure for payment from CHEF for cases in 
which the exigencies of the medical circumstances warrant treatment 
prior to the authorization of such treatment; and (5) establish a 
procedure that will ensure no payment will be made from CHEF to a 
Service Unit to the extent the provider of services is eligible to 
receive payment from any other Federal, State, local, or private source 
of reimbursement for which the patient is eligible.
    This comment period is being extended to allow all interested 
parties the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. Therefore, we 
are extending the comment period until May 10, 2016.

    Dated: March 4, 2016.
Elizabeth Fowler,
Deputy Director for Management Operations Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05555 Filed 3-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-P