Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental Impact Statement: Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii, 12946-12949 [2016-05542]
Download as PDF
12946
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: March 7, 2016.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05560 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NCR–WHHO–20523; PPNCWHHOP0,
PPMVSIE1Z.I00000 (166)]
Information Collection Request Sent to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; National Park
Service President’s Park National
Christmas Tree Music Program
Application
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service,
NPS) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. We summarize the
ICR below and describe the nature of the
collection and the estimated burden and
cost. We may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. However, under OMB
regulations, we may continue to
conduct or sponsor this information
collection while it is pending at OMB.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this information
collection to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior at OMB–
OIRA at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov (email).
Please provide a copy of your comments
to Madonna L. Baucum, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, National
Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242,
Reston, VA 20192; or madonna_
baucum@nps.gov (email). Please
include ‘‘1024–WHHO’’ in the subject
line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Katie Wilmes, National
Park Service, 1100 Ohio Drive SW., Rm
344, Washington, DC 20242; or via
email: Katie_Wilmes@nps.gov. You may
review the ICR online at https://
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by
OMB.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Mar 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The National Park Service (NPS)
Organic Act of 1916 (Organic Act) (54
U.S.C. 100101 et seq.) gives the NPS
broad authority to regulate the use of the
park areas under its jurisdiction.
Consistent with the Organic Act, as well
as the Constitution’s Establishment
Clause which mandates government
neutrality and allows the placement of
holiday secular and religious displays,
the National Christmas Tree Music
Program’s holiday musical
entertainment may include both holiday
secular and religious music. To ensure
that any proposed music selection is
consistent with the Establishment
Clause, and presented in a prudent and
objective manner as a traditional part of
the culture and heritage of this annual
holiday event, it must be approved in
advance by the NPS.
The NPS National Christmas Tree
Music Program at President’s Park is
intended to provide musical
entertainment for park visitors during
December on the Ellipse, where in
celebration of the holiday season,
visitors can observe the National
Christmas Tree, visit assorted yuletide
displays, and attend musical
presentations. Each year, park officials
accept applications from musical groups
who wish to participate in the annual
National Christmas Tree Program. The
NPS utilizes Form 10–942, ‘‘National
Christmas Tree Music Program
Application’’ to accept applications
from the public for participation in the
program. Park officials utilize the
following information from applicants
in order to select, plan, schedule, and
contact performers for the National
Christmas Tree Program:
• Contact name, phone number, and
email.
• Group name and location (city,
state).
• Preferred performance dates and
times.
• Music selections/song list.
• Equipment needs.
• Number of performers.
• Type of group (choir, etc.).
• Acknowledgement of the musical
entertainment policy.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024–WHHO.
Title: National Park Service
President’s Park National Christmas
Tree Music Program Application.
Service Form Number(s): NPS Form
10–942, ‘‘National Christmas Tree
Music Program Application’’.
Type of Request: Existing collection in
use without approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description of Respondents: Local,
national, and international bands,
choirs, or dance groups.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 75.
Estimated Number of Annual Burden
Hours: 19.
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden
Cost: None.
III. Comments
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
Dated: March 7, 2016.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–05558 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–PWR–PWRO–20008;
PX.PR113509L.00.1]
Final General Management Plan/
Wilderness Study/Environmental
Impact Statement: Hawaii Volcanoes
National Park, Hawaii
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) has prepared a Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
for the General Management Plan (GMP)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices
for Hawaii Volcanoes National Park
(Hawaii Volcanoes NP or park). This
FEIS describes and analyzes three GMP
alternatives that respond to public
concerns and issues identified during
the overall public engagement process.
Each alternative presents management
strategies for resource protection and
preservation, education and
interpretation, visitor use and facilities,
land protection and boundaries, and
long-term operations and management
of Hawaii Volcanoes NP. The potential
environmental consequences of all the
alternatives, and mitigation strategies,
are analyzed and the ‘‘environmentally
preferred’’ alternative is identified. The
proposed GMP also includes a
wilderness study (WS) which analyzes
wilderness suitability of park lands and
includes a recommendation for
wilderness designation. With due
consideration for the minimal public
and agency response to the Draft EIS (no
substantive new information has been
received), the NPS has utilized an
abbreviated format in preparing the
FEIS. Upon approval, this GMP will
supersede the 1975 Master Plan.
DATES: The NPS will execute a Record
of Decision not sooner than April 11,
2016 after the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s notice of filing for
this FEIS.
ADDRESSES: Printed copies of both the
Draft and Final GMP/WS/EIS will be
available for public inspection at local
public libraries; an electronic version of
the final document is also available on
the GMP project Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/havo). A limited
number of printed copies of each
document are available upon written
request to: Superintendent, Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park, P.O. Box 52,
Hawaii National Park, HI 96718–0052.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Orlando, Superintendent, Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park, P.O. Box 52,
Hawaii National Park, HI 96718–0052 or
via telephone at (808) 985–6026.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: A Notice of Intent
announcing preparation of the EIS for
the GMP was published in the Federal
Register on April 13, 2009. During
spring 2009, the NPS distributed
approximately 8,500 newsletters
describing the GMP process and
soliciting feedback on issues which
should be addressed. A comprehensive
scoping outreach effort elicited public
comment regarding issues and concerns,
the nature and extent of potential
environmental impacts, and possible
alternatives that should be addressed in
the preparation of the GMP. Agencies,
organizations, governmental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Mar 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
representatives, and Native Hawaiian
organizations were sent letters of
invitation to attend the public
workshops or stakeholder meetings.
Press releases were distributed to local
and regional news media, and local
radio stations aired public service
announcements. News articles featuring
these meetings were published in West
Hawaii Today, Hawaii Tribune Herald,
and the Kau Calendar.
The NPS held seven public meetings
on the islands of Hawaii, Oahu and
Maui in April and May 2009 to provide
the public with an opportunity to learn
about the GMP project and to offer
comments; a total of 95 people attended
the meetings. The park also conducted
several stakeholder meetings to obtain
input from representatives of city,
county, and federal agencies, business
and community organizations, Native
Hawaiian organizations, and research
permit holders. Park staff also gave
poster presentations at local meetings of
the Kau Chamber of Commerce, Volcano
Community Association, and Friends of
Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.
Altogether during the 2009 scoping
phase, the park planning team spoke
with approximately 2000 people at
public and stakeholder meetings and
park and community events.
Correspondence received from over 130
individuals and organizations
engendered approximately 1,250
specific comments.
During August 2011, the NPS
distributed a Draft Alternatives
Newsletter, which outlined concepts
and actions in the preliminary GMP
alternatives and proposed management
zones, and explained the completed
wilderness eligibility process and the
subsequent wilderness study that would
be included in the Draft EIS (DEIS). The
Newsletter contained a business reply
questionnaire option to facilitate public
comments. In addition to the planning
schedule included in the Newsletter,
information was distributed to local and
regional press media in advance of the
public meetings and articles were
printed in three local papers: West
Hawaii Today, Hawaii Tribune Herald,
and the Kau Calendar.
Expanding the scope of the EIS was
announced in the Federal Register on
December 2, 2011. The scope of analysis
was expanded to include a wilderness
study in order to evaluate foreseeable
effects associated with possible
designation of additional wilderness
within the park. This notification also
formally extended the GMP preliminary
alternatives comment period through
January 2, 2012, in order to gain
additional comments about wilderness
and the recently evaluated wilderness-
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12947
eligible lands within the Kahuku Unit.
The NPS undertook additional public
involvement at the draft alternatives
phase to ensure ample opportunity for
formal scoping for the wilderness study.
During this phase the park planning
team described the wilderness eligibility
analysis that had been completed for the
Kahuku Unit and elicited public
comments specifically focused on the
wilderness study.
The NPS conducted five public open
house and stakeholder meetings; a total
of 66 people participated. Overall the
NPS received 72 written responses in
the form of letters, emails, comment
forms, and comments submitted on the
PEPC Web site. All comments received
were reviewed by the GMP team to
inform preparation of the DEIS/GMP/
WS. A summary of public comments on
the preliminary alternatives and
wilderness study was created and made
available to the public in February 2012.
The 60 day review period for the
DEIS/GMP/WS was formally initiated
through publication by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency of its
Notice of Availability in the Federal
Register on May 1, 2015. A press release
announcing availability of the document
was distributed to local and regional
news media on April 30, 2015.
Electronic and printed copies of the
draft plan were available on NPS Web
sites and at public libraries, as well
through distribution to state
congressional offices, Native Hawaiians,
governmental agencies, and other
interested organizations and
individuals. The NPS also distributed
the DEIS/GMP/WS Executive Summary
Newsletter #4 to over 800 contacts on
the GMP mailing list.
The NPS held a ‘‘talk story’’ session
and formal wilderness hearing on June
¯
10, 2015, at the Kılauea Visitor Center;
approximately 20 people participated in
these meetings and provided oral
comments. The ‘‘talk story’’ session is a
traditional Hawaiian practice which is
similar to an open house information
meeting. The wilderness hearing was
facilitated by the NPS, and an
independent court reporter conducted
the proceedings and responded to
questions about wilderness protection
and management and recorded formal
comments regarding the Wilderness
Study. This talk story session and
wilderness hearing was announced via
the Newsletter, the project Web site, and
a separate press release that was
distributed to media on June 5, 2015.
Throughout the public review period,
the public had opportunities to provide
comments through attending the talk
story session and wilderness hearing,
submitting comments on NPS Web sites,
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
12948
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices
writing a letter or email, or providing
comments on the postage paid comment
form enclosed in the newsletter. Overall
the NPS received approximately 32
responses. Of the comments received,
two were from businesses, two were
from non-profit conservation
organizations, two were from other
federal agencies, and the remaining
comments were from interested
individuals. None of the comments
received were opposed to or critical of
the proposals for wilderness designation
or boundary modification included
within the plan. Most comments were
supportive of the NPS preferred
alternative, Alternative 2. Because the
comments received required only minor
changes involving only factual
corrections or clarifications, the NPS
has prepared an Abbreviated FEIS
which includes an analysis of comments
received on the Draft GMP/WS/EIS with
NPS responses, errata sheets detailing
editorial corrections to the DEIS, and
copies of letters received from agencies
and organizations. No substantial
changes have been made to the
alternatives or to the impact analyses
presented in the Draft GMP/WS/EIS,
and Alternative 2 remains the preferred
alternative.
Range of Alternatives: Alternative 1
(no action)—Existing programming,
facilities, staffing, and funding would
generally continue at current levels to
protect the values of Hawaii Volcanoes
National Park. There would be no major
changes in current management or
visitor use. Implementation of currently
approved plans would continue as
funding allows. This alternative
provides the baseline for evaluating
actions and impacts in other
alternatives.
Alternative 2 (agency preferred;
environmentally preferred)—
Strengthens and expands opportunities
to connect people with the volcanic
world treasure, Hawaii Volcanoes NP,
and provide a wide range of high quality
visitor experiences based on different
¯
geographic areas. Kılauea summit would
continue to be the most actively visited
area of the park with the greatest
concentration of services and amenities
for park visitors. Along Chain of Craters
Road and Mauna Loa Road, the park
would strive to provide visitors with
improved opportunities to experience
and connect with park resources and
values, including new opportunities at
places like Mauna Ulu and
Kealakomowaena, while dispersing use
to create a less congested and more
tranquil experience. At Kahuku,
although visitor access and recreation
opportunities would be expanded from
what is currently offered, infrastructure
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Mar 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
and development would be minimal,
gradually phased in over time, and
remain rustic in design to allow for a
primitive visitor experience. Natural
and cultural resources would continue
to be managed and protected with a
high degree of integrity, consistent with
direction provided by existing laws and
policies. This alternative emphasizes
the park’s role as a refuge and haven for
native biota, people, and cultures in a
world constantly adapting to volcanic
activity and island building processes.
Native Hawaiian people and cultural
values such as malama aina (nourishing
or taking care of the land) and kuleana
(responsibility), and perspectives from
Native Hawaiian land management such
as ahupuaa management (managing land
from mauka (mountains) to makai (sea)),
are incorporated as important concepts
in park stewardship of resources. Native
Hawaiian traditional ecological
knowledge would be used to enhance
current scientific understanding to
protect park resources and provide
additional interpretive and educational
opportunities for visitors.
Alternative 3—Emphasizes building
new connections with the park
primarily through expanded education
and hands-on stewardship
opportunities. Traditional visitor
opportunities would continue and
capacity could be expanded at some
existing sites to allow for increased
visitation, but new development would
be very limited and a suite of
management tools would be used to
disperse visitors and manage congestion
throughout the park. A greater focus
would be placed on science and
learning opportunities for visitors from
mauka (mountains) to makai (sea). The
park would immerse visitors in the
protection and restoration of native
species and ecosystems by maximizing
opportunities to participate in
restoration activities and additional
emphasis would be placed on providing
opportunities for visitors to engage in
research, scientific investigation, and
projects associated with natural and
cultural resources management, notably
in Kahuku. This alternative also
emphasizes the park’s role as a refuge
and haven for native biota, people, and
cultures in a world constantly adapting
to volcanic activity and island building
processes. This alternative honors the
Native Hawaiian people and culture by
recognizing Native Hawaiian values,
such as malama aina and kuleana, and
perspectives from Native Hawaiian land
management such as ahupuaa
management (managing land from
mauka to makai). Native Hawaiian
traditional ecological knowledge would
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be used to enhance current scientific
understanding to protect park resources
and provide additional interpretive and
educational opportunities for visitors.
Actions Common to All
Alternatives—Many aspects of natural
and cultural resource management (i.e.,
emphasis on restoring native
ecosystems, preservation of wilderness
character, and continued support for
research), visitor use and experience
(i.e., providing access to the iconic
places and volcanic processes), park
operations and concession services, and
partner collaborations on a variety of
issues (including coastal and shoreline
management) are common to all
alternatives. Moreover, flexibility in
managing the park is necessary given
proximity to two active volcanoes, and
volcanic eruptions are possible at any
time. Park management is influenced by
the magnitude of individual events.
Rather than provide specific
recommendations park responses to a
given event, the GMP provides general
‘‘adaptive management’’ guidance for
managers facing volcanic activity in the
future, notably with respect to facilities
and infrastructure in the park.
Notably, in 1989 a 5.5 mile segment
of the historic Chain of Craters Road
through the park towards Kalapana and
Pahoa was buried by lava flows. Due to
change in the direction of other lava
flows, in 2014 the remaining access to
the Pahoa area became threatened.
Consequently, an unpaved emergency
access route was constructed along the
old alignment. This route is only
available for emergency access, in the
event of existing access to Pahoa being
cut off. Under all alternatives, when this
route is no longer needed for emergency
access, it could be used as an
equestrian, biking, and hiking trail to
provide for non-motorized visitor use—
it would continue to be available in the
future as an emergency route without
compromising natural values and
avoiding complexity of managing a new
coastal entrance to the park.
Wilderness Study—Wilderness
designation of 121,015 acres found
eligible in the Kahuku Unit is proposed
as an extension of existing wilderness
within the park. Designation would
advance the park’s conservation vision
for high-elevation protection of unique
natural and cultural resources and
create connectivity for park wilderness
that would span from the summit of
Mauna Loa Volcano all the way down
its massive Southwest Rift. This rugged
and remote environment offers
outstanding opportunities for solitude
and potential for high-challenge
recreational hiking, and nearly all of
this area is a place where the imprint of
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2016 / Notices
humans is scarcely noticeable,
overpowered by the vast lava expanse
and aura of wildness. Consistent with
NPS policy, the park would continue to
manage these eligible lands for their
wilderness qualities prior to formal
designation.
Decision Process: As noted above, not
sooner than 30 days after the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency notice
of filing of the FEIS/GMP/WS is
published in the Federal Register, the
NPS will execute a Record of Decision.
Notice of GMP approval will be
publicized on the park’s Web site, via
direct mailings, and through local and
regional press media. Because this is a
delegated EIS, the NPS official
responsible for approval of the GMP is
the Regional Director, Pacific West
Region. Subsequently, the official
responsible for project implementation
is the Superintendent, Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park.
Dated: December 17, 2015.
Martha J. Lee,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–05542 Filed 3–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–PVE–LWCF–20491,
PSSSLAD0016001 (166)]
Proposed Information Collection; Land
and Water Conservation Fund State
Assistance Program
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service,
NPS) will ask the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to approve the
information collection (IC) described
below. As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and as part of our
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, we invite the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this IC. This IC is
scheduled to expire on October 31,
2016. We may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: To ensure that we are able to
consider your comments on this IC, we
must receive them by May 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
on the ICR to Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, National Park Service, 12201
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Mar 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
Sunrise Valley Drive, Mail Stop 242—
Room 2C114, Reston, VA 20192 (mail);
or madonna_baucum@nps.gov (email).
Please include ‘‘1024–0031 LWCF’’ in
the subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this IC, contact Elisabeth Fondriest,
Recreation Grants Chief, State and Local
Assistance Programs Division at 202–
354–6916; or 1849 C Street NW. (2225),
Washington, DC 20240 (mail); or
elisabeth_fondriest@nps.gov (email).
Please include ‘‘1024–0031 LWCF’’ in
the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Land and Water Conservation
Fund Act of 1965 (LWCF Act) (54 U.S.C.
2003305 et seq.) was enacted to help
preserve, develop, and ensure public
access to outdoor recreation facilities.
The LWCF Act provides funds for and
authorizes Federal assistance to the
States for planning, acquisition, and
development of needed land and water
areas and facilities. As used for this
information collection, the term
‘‘States’’ includes the 50 States; the
Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the
Northern Mariana Islands; the District of
Columbia; and the territories of Guam,
the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American
Samoa.
In accordance with the LWCF Act, we
administer the LWCF State Assistance
Program, which provides matching
grants to States, and through the States
to local units of government. LWCF
grants are provided to States on a
matching basis for up to 50 percent of
the total project-related allowable costs.
Grants to eligible insular areas may be
for 100 percent assistance. The LWCF
State Assistance Program gives
maximum flexibility and responsibility
to the States. States establish their own
priorities and criteria and award their
grant money through a competitive
selection process based on a Statewide
recreation plan. Payments for all
projects are made to the State agency
that is authorized to accept and
administer funds paid for approved
projects. Local units of government
participate in the program as
subgrantees of the State with the State
retaining primary grant compliance
responsibility.
We collect the following information
for the LWCF State Assistance Program:
Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor
Recreation Plan (SCORP). The LWCF
Act requires that to be eligible for LWCF
financial assistance, each State must
prepare and submit to NPS for approval
a new or revised SCORP at least once
every 5 years.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12949
Open Project Selection Process
(OPSP). Each State must develop an
OPSP that provides objective criteria
and standards for grant selection that
are explicitly based on each State’s
priority needs for the acquisition and
development of outdoor recreation
resources as identified in the SCORP.
The OPSP is the connection between the
SCORP and the use of LWCF grants to
assist State efforts in meeting high
priority outdoor recreation resource
needs.
Application. States may seek financial
assistance for acquisition, development,
or planning projects to be conducted
under the LWCF Act. To receive a grant,
States must submit an application to
NPS for review to determine eligibility
under the authorizing legislation and to
select those projects that will provide
the highest return on the Federal
investment. Project proposals for LWCF
grants comprise the following:
• Proposal Description and
Environmental Screening Form (PD/
ESF). The PD assists the applicant in
developing a narrative that provides
administrative and descriptive
information to help the Federal
decisionmaker understand the nature of
the proposed project. The ESF indicates
the resources that could be impacted by
the project, enabling States and/or local
project sponsors to more accurately
follow an appropriate pathway for
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
analysis serves as part of the Federal
administrative record required by NEPA
and its implementing regulations.
• Project Agreement (Form 10–902).
This form documents the agreement
between the NPS and the State for
accomplishing the project. It binds the
Federal Government and the State to
certain obligations through its
acceptance of Federal assistance,
including the rules and regulations
applicable to the conduct of a project
under the Act and any special terms and
conditions to the project established by
the NPS and agreed to by the State.
• Description and Notification Form
(DNF) (Form 10–903). The State must
submit a DNF for each project. This
form provides data about assisted
project sites, such as location, acreages
and details about improvements, as
understood at the beginning of each
project.
• Pre-award Onsite Inspection Report.
The State must physically inspect
proposed project sites prior to the award
of grant funds and report on the
findings. The inspection must be
conducted in accord with the onsite
inspection agreement between the State
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12946-12949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05542]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-PWR-PWRO-20008; PX.PR113509L.00.1]
Final General Management Plan/Wilderness Study/Environmental
Impact Statement: Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) has prepared a Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the General Management Plan
(GMP)
[[Page 12947]]
for Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (Hawaii Volcanoes NP or park). This
FEIS describes and analyzes three GMP alternatives that respond to
public concerns and issues identified during the overall public
engagement process. Each alternative presents management strategies for
resource protection and preservation, education and interpretation,
visitor use and facilities, land protection and boundaries, and long-
term operations and management of Hawaii Volcanoes NP. The potential
environmental consequences of all the alternatives, and mitigation
strategies, are analyzed and the ``environmentally preferred''
alternative is identified. The proposed GMP also includes a wilderness
study (WS) which analyzes wilderness suitability of park lands and
includes a recommendation for wilderness designation. With due
consideration for the minimal public and agency response to the Draft
EIS (no substantive new information has been received), the NPS has
utilized an abbreviated format in preparing the FEIS. Upon approval,
this GMP will supersede the 1975 Master Plan.
DATES: The NPS will execute a Record of Decision not sooner than April
11, 2016 after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's notice of
filing for this FEIS.
ADDRESSES: Printed copies of both the Draft and Final GMP/WS/EIS will
be available for public inspection at local public libraries; an
electronic version of the final document is also available on the GMP
project Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/havo). A limited number
of printed copies of each document are available upon written request
to: Superintendent, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, P.O. Box 52, Hawaii
National Park, HI 96718-0052.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Orlando, Superintendent, Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park, P.O. Box 52, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718-
0052 or via telephone at (808) 985-6026.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: A Notice of Intent announcing preparation of the EIS
for the GMP was published in the Federal Register on April 13, 2009.
During spring 2009, the NPS distributed approximately 8,500 newsletters
describing the GMP process and soliciting feedback on issues which
should be addressed. A comprehensive scoping outreach effort elicited
public comment regarding issues and concerns, the nature and extent of
potential environmental impacts, and possible alternatives that should
be addressed in the preparation of the GMP. Agencies, organizations,
governmental representatives, and Native Hawaiian organizations were
sent letters of invitation to attend the public workshops or
stakeholder meetings. Press releases were distributed to local and
regional news media, and local radio stations aired public service
announcements. News articles featuring these meetings were published in
West Hawaii Today, Hawaii Tribune Herald, and the Kau Calendar.
The NPS held seven public meetings on the islands of Hawaii, Oahu
and Maui in April and May 2009 to provide the public with an
opportunity to learn about the GMP project and to offer comments; a
total of 95 people attended the meetings. The park also conducted
several stakeholder meetings to obtain input from representatives of
city, county, and federal agencies, business and community
organizations, Native Hawaiian organizations, and research permit
holders. Park staff also gave poster presentations at local meetings of
the Kau Chamber of Commerce, Volcano Community Association, and Friends
of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Altogether during the 2009 scoping
phase, the park planning team spoke with approximately 2000 people at
public and stakeholder meetings and park and community events.
Correspondence received from over 130 individuals and organizations
engendered approximately 1,250 specific comments.
During August 2011, the NPS distributed a Draft Alternatives
Newsletter, which outlined concepts and actions in the preliminary GMP
alternatives and proposed management zones, and explained the completed
wilderness eligibility process and the subsequent wilderness study that
would be included in the Draft EIS (DEIS). The Newsletter contained a
business reply questionnaire option to facilitate public comments. In
addition to the planning schedule included in the Newsletter,
information was distributed to local and regional press media in
advance of the public meetings and articles were printed in three local
papers: West Hawaii Today, Hawaii Tribune Herald, and the Kau Calendar.
Expanding the scope of the EIS was announced in the Federal
Register on December 2, 2011. The scope of analysis was expanded to
include a wilderness study in order to evaluate foreseeable effects
associated with possible designation of additional wilderness within
the park. This notification also formally extended the GMP preliminary
alternatives comment period through January 2, 2012, in order to gain
additional comments about wilderness and the recently evaluated
wilderness-eligible lands within the Kahuku Unit. The NPS undertook
additional public involvement at the draft alternatives phase to ensure
ample opportunity for formal scoping for the wilderness study. During
this phase the park planning team described the wilderness eligibility
analysis that had been completed for the Kahuku Unit and elicited
public comments specifically focused on the wilderness study.
The NPS conducted five public open house and stakeholder meetings;
a total of 66 people participated. Overall the NPS received 72 written
responses in the form of letters, emails, comment forms, and comments
submitted on the PEPC Web site. All comments received were reviewed by
the GMP team to inform preparation of the DEIS/GMP/WS. A summary of
public comments on the preliminary alternatives and wilderness study
was created and made available to the public in February 2012.
The 60 day review period for the DEIS/GMP/WS was formally initiated
through publication by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency of its
Notice of Availability in the Federal Register on May 1, 2015. A press
release announcing availability of the document was distributed to
local and regional news media on April 30, 2015. Electronic and printed
copies of the draft plan were available on NPS Web sites and at public
libraries, as well through distribution to state congressional offices,
Native Hawaiians, governmental agencies, and other interested
organizations and individuals. The NPS also distributed the DEIS/GMP/WS
Executive Summary Newsletter #4 to over 800 contacts on the GMP mailing
list.
The NPS held a ``talk story'' session and formal wilderness hearing
on June 10, 2015, at the K[imacr]lauea Visitor Center; approximately 20
people participated in these meetings and provided oral comments. The
``talk story'' session is a traditional Hawaiian practice which is
similar to an open house information meeting. The wilderness hearing
was facilitated by the NPS, and an independent court reporter conducted
the proceedings and responded to questions about wilderness protection
and management and recorded formal comments regarding the Wilderness
Study. This talk story session and wilderness hearing was announced via
the Newsletter, the project Web site, and a separate press release that
was distributed to media on June 5, 2015.
Throughout the public review period, the public had opportunities
to provide comments through attending the talk story session and
wilderness hearing, submitting comments on NPS Web sites,
[[Page 12948]]
writing a letter or email, or providing comments on the postage paid
comment form enclosed in the newsletter. Overall the NPS received
approximately 32 responses. Of the comments received, two were from
businesses, two were from non-profit conservation organizations, two
were from other federal agencies, and the remaining comments were from
interested individuals. None of the comments received were opposed to
or critical of the proposals for wilderness designation or boundary
modification included within the plan. Most comments were supportive of
the NPS preferred alternative, Alternative 2. Because the comments
received required only minor changes involving only factual corrections
or clarifications, the NPS has prepared an Abbreviated FEIS which
includes an analysis of comments received on the Draft GMP/WS/EIS with
NPS responses, errata sheets detailing editorial corrections to the
DEIS, and copies of letters received from agencies and organizations.
No substantial changes have been made to the alternatives or to the
impact analyses presented in the Draft GMP/WS/EIS, and Alternative 2
remains the preferred alternative.
Range of Alternatives: Alternative 1 (no action)--Existing
programming, facilities, staffing, and funding would generally continue
at current levels to protect the values of Hawaii Volcanoes National
Park. There would be no major changes in current management or visitor
use. Implementation of currently approved plans would continue as
funding allows. This alternative provides the baseline for evaluating
actions and impacts in other alternatives.
Alternative 2 (agency preferred; environmentally preferred)--
Strengthens and expands opportunities to connect people with the
volcanic world treasure, Hawaii Volcanoes NP, and provide a wide range
of high quality visitor experiences based on different geographic
areas. K[imacr]lauea summit would continue to be the most actively
visited area of the park with the greatest concentration of services
and amenities for park visitors. Along Chain of Craters Road and Mauna
Loa Road, the park would strive to provide visitors with improved
opportunities to experience and connect with park resources and values,
including new opportunities at places like Mauna Ulu and
Kealakomowaena, while dispersing use to create a less congested and
more tranquil experience. At Kahuku, although visitor access and
recreation opportunities would be expanded from what is currently
offered, infrastructure and development would be minimal, gradually
phased in over time, and remain rustic in design to allow for a
primitive visitor experience. Natural and cultural resources would
continue to be managed and protected with a high degree of integrity,
consistent with direction provided by existing laws and policies. This
alternative emphasizes the park's role as a refuge and haven for native
biota, people, and cultures in a world constantly adapting to volcanic
activity and island building processes. Native Hawaiian people and
cultural values such as malama aina (nourishing or taking care of the
land) and kuleana (responsibility), and perspectives from Native
Hawaiian land management such as ahupuaa management (managing land from
mauka (mountains) to makai (sea)), are incorporated as important
concepts in park stewardship of resources. Native Hawaiian traditional
ecological knowledge would be used to enhance current scientific
understanding to protect park resources and provide additional
interpretive and educational opportunities for visitors.
Alternative 3--Emphasizes building new connections with the park
primarily through expanded education and hands-on stewardship
opportunities. Traditional visitor opportunities would continue and
capacity could be expanded at some existing sites to allow for
increased visitation, but new development would be very limited and a
suite of management tools would be used to disperse visitors and manage
congestion throughout the park. A greater focus would be placed on
science and learning opportunities for visitors from mauka (mountains)
to makai (sea). The park would immerse visitors in the protection and
restoration of native species and ecosystems by maximizing
opportunities to participate in restoration activities and additional
emphasis would be placed on providing opportunities for visitors to
engage in research, scientific investigation, and projects associated
with natural and cultural resources management, notably in Kahuku. This
alternative also emphasizes the park's role as a refuge and haven for
native biota, people, and cultures in a world constantly adapting to
volcanic activity and island building processes. This alternative
honors the Native Hawaiian people and culture by recognizing Native
Hawaiian values, such as malama aina and kuleana, and perspectives from
Native Hawaiian land management such as ahupuaa management (managing
land from mauka to makai). Native Hawaiian traditional ecological
knowledge would be used to enhance current scientific understanding to
protect park resources and provide additional interpretive and
educational opportunities for visitors.
Actions Common to All Alternatives--Many aspects of natural and
cultural resource management (i.e., emphasis on restoring native
ecosystems, preservation of wilderness character, and continued support
for research), visitor use and experience (i.e., providing access to
the iconic places and volcanic processes), park operations and
concession services, and partner collaborations on a variety of issues
(including coastal and shoreline management) are common to all
alternatives. Moreover, flexibility in managing the park is necessary
given proximity to two active volcanoes, and volcanic eruptions are
possible at any time. Park management is influenced by the magnitude of
individual events. Rather than provide specific recommendations park
responses to a given event, the GMP provides general ``adaptive
management'' guidance for managers facing volcanic activity in the
future, notably with respect to facilities and infrastructure in the
park.
Notably, in 1989 a 5.5 mile segment of the historic Chain of
Craters Road through the park towards Kalapana and Pahoa was buried by
lava flows. Due to change in the direction of other lava flows, in 2014
the remaining access to the Pahoa area became threatened. Consequently,
an unpaved emergency access route was constructed along the old
alignment. This route is only available for emergency access, in the
event of existing access to Pahoa being cut off. Under all
alternatives, when this route is no longer needed for emergency access,
it could be used as an equestrian, biking, and hiking trail to provide
for non-motorized visitor use--it would continue to be available in the
future as an emergency route without compromising natural values and
avoiding complexity of managing a new coastal entrance to the park.
Wilderness Study--Wilderness designation of 121,015 acres found
eligible in the Kahuku Unit is proposed as an extension of existing
wilderness within the park. Designation would advance the park's
conservation vision for high-elevation protection of unique natural and
cultural resources and create connectivity for park wilderness that
would span from the summit of Mauna Loa Volcano all the way down its
massive Southwest Rift. This rugged and remote environment offers
outstanding opportunities for solitude and potential for high-challenge
recreational hiking, and nearly all of this area is a place where the
imprint of
[[Page 12949]]
humans is scarcely noticeable, overpowered by the vast lava expanse and
aura of wildness. Consistent with NPS policy, the park would continue
to manage these eligible lands for their wilderness qualities prior to
formal designation.
Decision Process: As noted above, not sooner than 30 days after the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notice of filing of the FEIS/GMP/
WS is published in the Federal Register, the NPS will execute a Record
of Decision. Notice of GMP approval will be publicized on the park's
Web site, via direct mailings, and through local and regional press
media. Because this is a delegated EIS, the NPS official responsible
for approval of the GMP is the Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
Subsequently, the official responsible for project implementation is
the Superintendent, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.
Dated: December 17, 2015.
Martha J. Lee,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-05542 Filed 3-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-FF-P