Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions From Off-Road Diesel Vehicles, 12637-12641 [2016-05278]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Dated: February 24, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FR Doc. 2016–05161 Filed 3–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0642; FRL–9943–42–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Mexico; and Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County; Revisions To Establish Small
Business Stationary Source Technical
and Environmental Compliance
Assistance Programs
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for both the
State and Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County. These proposed revisions
establish Small Business Stationary
Assistance Source Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance
Programs. The EPA is proposing to
approve these revisions pursuant to
sections 110 and 507(a) of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by following the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
the direct final rule located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John Walser, (214) 665–7128,
walser.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, the EPA is approving
the State’s SIP submittal as a direct rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated. If
the EPA receives relevant adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Mar 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0819; FRL–9943–47–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan; South Coast Air
Quality Management District; Control
of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions From
Off-Road Diesel Vehicles
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
South Coast Air Quality Management
District’s (SCAQMD or District) Rule
2449, Control of Oxides of Nitrogen
Emissions from Off-Road Diesel
Vehicles, which adopts by reference
title 13, chapter 9, section 2449.2 of the
California Code of Regulations (CCR),
‘‘Surplus Off-Road Opt-In for NOX
(SOON) Program,’’ as part of the
SCAQMD portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). SCAQMD
Rule 2449 requires certain in-use offroad vehicle fleets to meet more
stringent requirements in the South
Coast area when funding is provided by
the District in order to achieve
additional reductions of oxides of
Nitrogen (NOX). We are taking
comments on this proposal and plan to
follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0819 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
lo.doris@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12637
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3959, lo.doris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of the rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule?
D. What do the Off-Road Regulation and
Rule 2449 require?
III. The EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s
Submittal
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does Rule 2449 meet CAA SIP
evaluation criteria?
1. Did the SCAQMD and CARB provide
adequate public notice and comment
periods?
2. Do the SCAQMD and CARB have
adequate legal authority to implement
the rule?
3. Is the rule enforceable as required under
CAA section 110(a)(2)?
4. Does the rule interfere with reasonable
further progress and attainment or any
other applicable requirement of the Act?
5. Will the State and the SCAQMD have
adequate personnel and funding for the
rule?
6. Does the rule meet the RACM and
BACM requirements under CAA sections
172(c)(1) and 189?
7. The EPA’s Rule Evaluation Conclusion
IV. Proposed Action and Public Comment
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The California Air Resources Board’s
(CARB) Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets
Regulation (13 CCR sections 2449,
2449.1 and 2449.2) applies to fleets with
nonroad 1 compression-ignition vehicles
and equipment greater than 25
horsepower (hp). Sections 2449 and
2449.1 (collectively the ‘‘Off-Road
1 The Clean Air Act refers to these engines as
‘‘nonroad’’ engines and the State of California uses
the term ‘‘off-road’’ engines. The terms ‘‘nonroad’’
and ‘‘off-road’’ are used interchangeably in this
rule.
E:\FR\FM\10MRP1.SGM
10MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12638
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Regulation’’) require fleet operators to
meet a progressively more stringent
combined particulate matter (PM) and
NOX standard, or to reduce emissions
through technology upgrades such as
retrofit or replacement. The Off-Road
Regulation was initially approved by
CARB on July 26, 2007 and was
subsequently amended in December
2010.
In conjunction with the Off-Road
Regulation, CARB also adopted an ‘‘optin’’ provision that allows local air
districts to achieve additional
reductions of NOX emissions by
introducing cleaner engines or control
devices into a fleet with incentive
funding (see 13 CCR section 2449.2,
Surplus Off-Road Opt-In for NOX
Program (also referred to as the ‘‘CARB
SOON Program’’ in today’s proposed
rule)). Under this provision, any
California air district can ‘‘opt-in’’ to the
CARB SOON Program to achieve
reductions of NOX emissions from inuse nonroad diesel-fueled vehicles that
are surplus to what is required by
CARB’s Off-Road Regulation. In order to
participate in the CARB SOON Program,
a district’s governing board must hold a
public hearing, vote to ‘‘opt-in’’ to the
CARB SOON Program, and decide
whether to make the program voluntary
or mandatory.
On May 2, 2008 the SCAQMD
governing board held a public hearing at
which it voted to ‘‘opt-in’’ to the CARB
SOON Program as a mandatory
requirement and adopted Rule 2449,
Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions
from Off-Road Diesel Vehicles, which
includes by reference the CARB SOON
Program. The SCAQMD also adopted
additional Rule 2449 Administrative
Guidelines (May 2008) as required by
the CARB SOON Program to implement
the program in the South Coast area. On
July 11, 2014, the SCAQMD amended
Rule 2449 to update the rule’s reference
to the CARB SOON Program, which was
amended by CARB in December 2011.
The SCAQMD Rule 2449 adopts the
provisions of the CARB SOON Program
found under 13 CCR, section 2449.2 into
the SCAQMD’s rule book and makes the
CARB SOON Program a mandatory
requirement for in-use off-road sources
located in the South Coast area.2
CARB’s Off-Road Regulation and the
CARB SOON Program are subject to
section 209(e) of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act), which generally preempts
States from adopting and enforcing
standards and other requirements
relating to the control of emissions from
2 Unless
otherwise indicated, references in this
notice to Rule 2449 include the CARB Soon
Program, as implemented through Rule 2449.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Mar 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
nonroad engines (see CAA section
209(e)(1) and Engine Mfrs. Ass’n v. EPA,
88 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 1996)). However,
CAA section 209(e)(2)(A) requires the
EPA to authorize California to adopt and
enforce standards and other
requirements relating to the control of
emissions from certain nonroad vehicles
or engines, unless the EPA makes one of
three enumerated findings. On
September 20, 2013 the EPA authorized
CARB to enforce the Off-Road
Regulation and the CARB SOON
Program (collectively ‘‘Fleet
Requirements’’) (see 78 FR 58090–
58121, September 20, 2013).
On November 12, 2015, the EPA
proposed to approve the Fleet
Requirements into the California SIP
(see 80 FR 69915).3
II. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
On July 18, 2008, the State of
California submitted SCAQMD Rule
2449, ‘‘Control of Oxides of Nitrogen
Emissions from Off-Road Vehicles,’’
which was adopted by the District on
May 2, 2008 (see July 18, 2008 letter
from Michael H. Scheible, Deputy
Executive Officer, CARB, to Wayne
Nastri, Regional Administrator, EPA
Region 9, with attachments).
On September 5, 2014, the state
submitted a revision to Rule 2449
adopted by the District on July 11, 2014.
The submittal made a minor
administrative revision to the
numbering of the referenced CARB
SOON Program, which was revised by
CARB in December 2011, from section
2449.3 to section 2449.2 (see September
5, 2014 letter to Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9,
from Richard W. Corey, Executive
Officer, Air Resources Board with
attachments).
The July 18, 2008 submittal was
deemed complete by operation of law
under CAA section 110(k)(1)(B) on
January 18, 2009. The September 5,
2014 submittal was deemed complete by
operation of law under CAA section
110(k)(1)(B) on March 5, 2015.
B. Are there other versions of the rule?
There are no previous versions of
Rule 2449 in the SIP for the SCAQMD.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule?
NOX helps produce ground-level
ozone, smog and fine particulate matter
(PM2.5), which harm human health and
3 In particular, the EPA proposed to approve 13
CCR sections 2449 (excluding subsection
2449(d)(2)), 2449.1, and 2449.2 into the SIP. 80 FR
69918, Table 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the environment. Section 110(a) of the
CAA requires States to submit
regulations that control NOX emissions.
In addition, section 172(c)(1) of the Act
requires implementation of all
reasonably available control measures
(RACM) as expeditiously as practicable
in nonattainment areas. Because the
South Coast area is designated
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone
standard, the 1997 annual and 24-hour
PM2.5 standard, the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
standard, the 2012 annual PM2.5
standard, the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard and the 2008 8-hour ozone
standard (see 40 CFR part 81.305),
CARB and the SCAQMD must
implement RACM for NOX (among other
pollutants) under CAA section 172(c)(1).
In addition, under subpart 4 of the CAA,
serious PM2.5 areas are required to adopt
best available control measures (BACM)
for PM2.5 and its precursors.4 On
January 13, 2016, the EPA reclassified
the South Coast PM2.5 nonattainment
area as a Serious nonattainment area for
the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS (81 FR 1514).
Off-road diesel vehicles collectively
represent one of the largest sources of
NOX emissions in the South Coast Air
Basin.5 The purpose of Rule 2449 is to
achieve surplus NOX reductions from
this source category beyond those
required under CARB’s Off-Road
Regulation with funding provided by
the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD’s 2012 Air
Quality Management Plan (AQMP)
relies on NOX reductions from Rule
2449 to attain the one-hour and 1997
eight-hour ozone NAAQS.6 Rule 2449 is
expected to achieve 7.5 tons per day
(tpd) of NOX reductions in 2023.7
D. What do the Off-Road Regulation and
Rule 2449 require?
In general, CARB’s Off-Road
Regulation applies to all diesel-fueled
off-road fleet equipment owners
operating in the State of California. The
Off-Road Regulation has performance
requirements depending on the size of
the fleet (i.e., a large fleet is defined as
a fleet having greater than 5,000
horsepower (hp), a small fleet has less
4 The EPA generally takes action on a RACM or
BACM demonstration as part of our action on the
State’s attainment demonstration for the relevant
NAAQS.
5 See, e.g., Draft Staff Report, Proposed Amended
Rule 2449—Control of Oxides of Nitrogen
Emissions from Off-Road Diesel Vehicles, page 1
(May 2014).
6 See 2012 AQMP, Table 4–6, page 4–33, OFFRD–
01, Extension of the SOON Provision for
Construction/Industrial Equipment [NOX] and
Appendix IV–B, pages IV–B–30 thru IV–B–32.
7 Id. The EPA is not proposing to approve the
emission reductions in today’s proposed rule.
Emission reductions or SIP credit from Rule 2449
will be addressed in future EPA actions on
attainment plans.
E:\FR\FM\10MRP1.SGM
10MRP1
12639
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
than or equal to 2,500 hp, and a medium
fleet is in between) 8 and provides
calculation methodologies for
determining a fleet average index and a
fleet average target rate. Each year, each
subject fleet must demonstrate that its
fleet average index was less than or
equal to the applicable fleet average
target rate or that it met Best Available
Control Technology (BACT)
requirements by performing turnover or
installing verified diesel emission
control strategies (VDECS).9 As
discussed above, the EPA has
authorized CARB to implement the OffRoad Regulation under CAA section
209(e) (78 FR 58090) and has proposed
to approve the Off-Road Regulation into
the California SIP (80 FR 69915).
SCAQMD Rule 2449 focuses on the
largest fleets with the oldest engines and
requires these fleets to meet more
stringent fleet average targets than those
required by section 2449.1(a) of the OffRoad Regulation. In general, Rule 2449
applies to the owners 10 of off-road
vehicles that operate within the
SCAQMD and that are part of fleets with
more than 40 percent Tier 0 and Tier 1
vehicles 11 (as of January 1, 2008) and
with more than 20,000 horsepower (hp)
in maximum power on a statewide basis
(excluding the hp from engines in twoengine vehicles and the hp from single
cranes formerly subject to the Cargo
Handling Equipment Regulation).12
Once the District issues a solicitation
for applications for funding under Rule
2449, subject fleet owners are required
to meet the more stringent fleet average
targets required by the CARB SOON
Program or apply for incentive funding
for a sufficient number of projects (e.g.,
repowers, purchases, replacements) to
meet the CARB SOON Program fleet
average targets (reproduced in Table 1
below).13
TABLE 1—SOON TARGET FOR EACH MAX HP GROUP FOR USE IN CALCULATING SOON FLEET AVERAGE TARGET RATES
[g/bhp-hr]
Compliance date: Jan 1 of
year
2011
2014
2017
2020
2023
25–49 hp
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
50–74 hp
5.6
5.8
5.0
4.1
3.3
75–99 hp
6.2
6.5
5.4
4.2
3.0
100–174 hp
175–299 hp
300–599 hp
600–750 hp
6.0
6.4
4.9
3.1
1.3
5.4
3.9
2.2
1.4
0.7
5.1
3.7
2.2
1.3
0.7
5.3
3.7
2.2
1.4
0.7
6.7
7.1
5.5
3.4
1.4
>750 hp
6.4
5.3
4.3
3.4
2.7
Source: Reproduction of Table 5 of section 2449.2(d) of CARB SOON Program. These fleet average target rates are more stringent than what
is required under the Off-Road Regulation (see 13 CCR section 2449.1(a)(1), Table 3).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Specifically, subject fleet owners are
required to submit a report with
information on, including but not
limited to, the fleet owner, vehicle types
and uses of each vehicle, engines used
to power the vehicles and the type and
use of each engine, and VDECS installed
on engines. 13 CCR section
2449.2(d)(1)(A)). Fleets must calculate
their fleet average index based on the
equipment they have and compare it to
the fleet average target rate based on the
SOON target rates shown in Table 1
above (13 CCR section 2449.2(d)(1)(B)
and (C)), and if their fleet average index
is greater than the SOON fleet average
target rate, they are required to apply for
funding (13 CCR section
2449.2(d)(1)(D)). Fleets must apply for
funding in accordance with the Carl
Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards
Attainment Program (Carl Moyer
Program) 14 policies and procedures and
also with the Administrative
Guidelines 15 adopted by the SCAQMD,
which provide further clarification on
what to include in the funding
applications and compliance plans.
Funding applications and compliance
plans must together demonstrate that
equipment identified for the CARB
SOON Program funding will result in
surplus 16 reductions in order to qualify
for incentive funding. Once a fleet
receives funding for a qualified project,
the fleet is required to implement the
project. The SCAQMD has approved
significant funding for the
implementation of Rule 2449. The 2012
AQMP states that the District Governing
Board has allocated up to $30 million
per year for the program and extended
the SOON Program to 2023 (see Final
2012 AQMP: Appendix IV–B, p. IV–B–
31). For ‘‘FY 2015–2016,’’ or ‘‘Year 18’’
of the Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality
Standards Attainment Program, the
SCAQMD expects that approximately $5
million of funding will be available for
the SCAQMD SOON Program (see
DRAFT Technology Committee Agenda
8 See CARB’s Off-Road Regulation, section
2449(c)(24), definition of ‘‘Fleet size category.’’
9 See CARB’s Off-Road Regulation, section
2449.1(a) Fleet Average Requirements, 2449.1(b)
BACT Requirements, and Appendix A with table of
‘‘Emission Factors by Horsepower and Year (g/bhphr).’’
10 Most provisions of the CARB SOON Program
apply to fleets rather than fleet owners or operators
(see e.g. sections 2449.2(b)(2) and (d)(1)). However,
SCAQMD Rule 2449 makes these requirements
applicable to the owners of off-road vehicles that
operate in SCAQMD and meet the criteria in 13
CCR 2449.2(b)(2).
11 See 13 CCR section 2449(c)(48) and (49) for
definitions of Tier 0 and Tier 1 engines.
12 See 13 CCR section 2449.2(b)(2), adopted by
reference under SCAQMD Rule 2449.
13 See 13 CCR section 2449.2(d). Thus, for
example, the Off-Road Regulation requires ‘‘large’’
fleets to meet a fleet average target of 1.5 g/bhp-hr
for 175–750 hp engines and 3.4 g/bhp-hr for greater
than 750 hp engines in the year 2023, whereas Rule
2449 and the CARB SOON Program require a fleet
average target of 0.7 g/bhp-hr for 175–750 hp
engines and 2.7 g/bhp-hr for greater than 750 hp
engines in 2023.
14 The Carl Moyer Program funds are used to fund
Rule 2449 with the requirement that all projects
meet, at a minimum, the Carl Moyer Program’s
latest requirements and guidelines (e.g., project
selection criteria, co-funding requirements, and
reporting and monitoring requirements). For more
information on the Carl Moyer Program, see https://
www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/moyer/moyer.htm.
15 In addition to the Carl Moyer Program
guidelines, the CARB SOON Program requires the
District to adopt District guidelines, through a
public process, that include additional
administrative provisions necessary to implement
the CARB SOON Program. These provisions
include, but are not limited to, funding guidelines,
compliance planning requirements and reporting
and monitoring requirements. The SCAQMD
adopted these additional district guidelines on May
22, 2008 (see Draft Administrative Guidelines,
Proposed Rule 2449 Administrative Guidelines,
SCAQMD, May 2008). The SCAQMD Board plans
to consider amendments to the May 2008
Administrative Guidelines on March 4, 2016 (see
DRAFT Technology Committee Agenda #1,
prepared for BOARD MEETING DATE: March 4,
2016, with Attachment 4, SOON Provision
Implementation Guidelines). The amendments
include referencing the correct section of CARB’s
Off-Road Regulation and aligning funding levels for
the SCAQMD SOON Program with the Carl Moyer
program. If approved by the SCAQMD Board, the
EPA expects the SCAQMD to forward the
amendments to CARB for approval.
16 Surplus reductions are those NO reductions
X
that are not needed for meeting the requirements of
the Off-Road Regulation. If surplus reductions are
available and used to meet the requirements of Rule
2449 and the CARB SOON Program, then those
reductions cannot be used to meet the requirements
of the Off-Road Regulation until they are no longer
needed for compliance with Rule 2449.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Mar 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10MRP1.SGM
10MRP1
12640
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
#1, prepared for BOARD MEETING
DATE: March 4, 2016, page 3).
III. The EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s
Submittal
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
The EPA has evaluated Rule 2449
against the applicable procedural and
substantive CAA requirements for SIPs
and SIP revisions and has concluded
that it meets all of the applicable
requirements.
Generally, SIPs must include
enforceable emission limitations and
other control measures, means, or
techniques, as well as schedules and
timetables for compliance, as may be
necessary to meet the requirements of
the Act (see CAA section 110(a)(2)(A));
must provide necessary assurances that
the State will have adequate personnel,
funding, and authority under State law
to carry out such SIP (and is not
prohibited by any provision of Federal
to State law from carrying out such SIP)
(see CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)); must be
adopted by a State after reasonable
notice and public hearing (see CAA
section 110(l)), and must not interfere
with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the Act (see CAA section
110(l)).17
In addition, as noted above, CARB
and the SCAQMD must implement
RACM for NOX (among other pollutants)
under CAA section 172(c)(1).
B. Does Rule 2449 meet CAA SIP
evaluation criteria?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Did the SCAQMD and CARB provide
adequate public notice and comment
periods?
Under CAA section 110(l), SIP
revisions must be adopted by the State,
and the State must provide for
reasonable public notice and hearing
prior to adoption. In 40 CFR 51.102(d),
we specify that reasonable public notice
in this context refers to at least 30 days.
The State has submitted evidence of
public notice and hearing prior to the
May 5, 2008 adoption and July 11, 2014
amendment of Rule 2449 by the
SCAQMD (see attachments to July 18,
2008 letter to Mr. Wayne Nastri, EPA
Region 9 from Michael H. Scheible, Air
Resource Board and attachments to
September 5, 2014 letter to Mr. Jared
17 CAA section 193, which prohibits any pre-1990
SIP control requirement relating to nonattainment
pollutants in nonattainment areas from being
modified unless the SIP is revised to insure
equivalent or greater emission reductions of such
air pollutants, does not apply to this rule because
it does not include any pre-1990 SIP control
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Mar 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Blumenfeld, EPA Region 9, from
Richard W. Corey, Air Resources Board).
Based on the evidence provided by the
SCAQMD and CARB, we conclude that
they have provided adequate public
notice and comment periods.
2. Do the SCAQMD and CARB have
adequate legal authority to implement
the rule?
California air districts are authorized
to adopt and enforce rules by California
Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section
40001. CARB is authorized to adopt the
rules as revisions to the SIP by H&SC
section 39601, 39602, and 41650
through 41652 (see CARB Executive
Order S–14–012).
In addition, we note that California
H&SC sections 43013(a) and 43018
provide CARB with broad authority to
achieve the maximum feasible and costeffective emission reductions from all
mobile source categories, including both
on-road and off-road diesel engines.
As discussed above, CARB’s Off-Road
Regulation is subject to CAA section
209(e), and on September 20, 2013 the
EPA granted CARB’s request for
authorization to enforce its Fleet
Requirements, including the CARB
SOON Program (see 78 FR 58090–
58121, September 20, 2013). Thus, we
find that the SCAQMD and CARB have
adequate legal authority to adopt and
implement Rule 2449.
3. Is the rule enforceable as required
under CAA section 110(a)(2)?
We have evaluated the enforceability
of Rule 2449 and the CARB SOON
Program with respect to applicability
and exemptions; standard of conduct
and compliance dates; sunset
provisions; discretionary provisions;
and test methods, recordkeeping and
reporting,18 and have concluded for the
reasons given below that the rule is
enforceable for the purposes of CAA
section 110(a)(2).
First, with respect to applicability, we
find Rule 2449 and the CARB SOON
Program to be sufficiently clear as to
which fleet owners and which vehicles
or engines are subject to the program
and the rule (see Rule 2449 and 13 CCR
section 2449.2(b)). In general, the rule
applies to owners of vehicles that
operate within the SCAQMD and are
part of a fleet consisting of 40 percent
Tier 0 and Tier 1 vehicles with greater
than 20,000 hp statewide, excluding the
hp from engines in two-engine vehicles
18 These concepts are discussed in detail in an
EPA memorandum from J. Craig Potter, EPA
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, et
al., titled ‘‘Review of State Implementation Plans
and Revisions for Enforceability and Legal
Sufficiency,’’ dated September 23, 1987.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and single engine cranes formerly
subject to the Cargo Handling
Equipment Regulation (see 13 CCR
2449.2(b)(2)).
Second, we find that Rule 2449 and
the CARB SOON Program are
sufficiently specific so that the persons
affected are fairly on notice as to what
the requirements and related
compliance dates are. We have
described the substantive requirements
and compliance dates set forth in Rule
2449 in section II.D. of today’s proposed
rule.
Third, the requirements of Rule 2449
will sunset at different times from 2011
through 2023, depending on when the
SCAQMD issues its solicitations for
funding; however, once a fleet is no
longer subject to Rule 2449, it will be
then be subject to the requirements of
the Off-Road Regulation.
Fourth, Rule 2449 contains a
provision that allows for discretion on
the part of CARB’s Executive Officer
(EO), this provision is limited both in
scope and application, and is no longer
relevant since the date to request
discretion has passed (see 13 CCR
section 2449.2(e)(2), allowing a fleet to
apply to the EO for an extension from
the requirements if the rule calculations
would require a fleet to turn over Tier
2 or better engines before January 1,
2014). As such, we find that this
provision does not undermine the
enforceability of Rule 2449 or preclude
its approval into the SIP.
Lastly, Rule 2449 identifies
appropriate calculation requirements
and includes adequate recordkeeping
and reporting requirements sufficient to
ensure compliance with the applicable
requirements. In particular, as described
above, once the SCAQMD issues a
solicitation, each subject fleet owner
must submit a report containing
detailed information about each vehicle
and engine in the fleet, each VDECS
installed on an engine in the fleet, and
other information related to compliance
with the Off-Road Rule (see 13 CCR
2449(d)(1)(A) and 2449(g). If the fleet
average index is greater than the SOON
fleet average target rate, the fleet owner
must apply for SOON funding (13 CCR
2449.2(d)(1)(B)). If the necessary NOX
retrofits, repower, or vehicle
replacements are available, the
application must indicate how these
retrofits, repowers, or vehicle
replacements would bring the fleet
average index for vehicles that operate
within the SCAQMD to less than or
equal to the SOON fleet average target
rate (13 CCR 2449.2(d)(1)(D)). In
addition, the fleet owner must prepare
and submit a compliance plan laying
out the actions it is required to take
E:\FR\FM\10MRP1.SGM
10MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
under section 2449.1 and the actions for
which it is applying to the SCAQMD for
funding under section 2449.2 (13 CCR
2449.2(e)(3)).
4. Does the rule interfere with
reasonable further progress and
attainment or any other applicable
requirement of the Act?
As discussed above, the SCAQMD’s
2012 AQMP relies on NOX reductions
from Rule 2449 to attain the one-hour
and 1997 eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The
EPA has approved SCAQMD’s
commitment to implement the SOON
Program as part of the SCAQMD’s
aggregate NOX emissions reductions
commitment (see 79 FR 29712, 29720
and 29721). Approval of Rule 2449 into
the SIP will help fulfill this
commitment. Thus, the EPA believes
that approval of Rule 2449 does not
interfere with Reasonable Further
Progress, attainment or any other
applicable requirement of the Act.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5. Will the State and the SCAQMD have
adequate personnel and funding for the
rule?
As discussed above, the SCAQMD has
approved significant funding for the
implementation of Rule 2449. The 2012
AQMP states that the SCAQMD Board
has allocated up to $30 million per year
for the program and extended the SOON
Program to 2023 (see Final 2012 AQMP:
Appendix IV–B, p. IV–B–31). For ‘‘FY
2015–2016,’’ or ‘‘Year 18’’ of the Carl
Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards
Attainment Program, the SCAQMD
expects to have approximately $5
million of funding available for the
SCAQMD SOON Program (see DRAFT
Technology Committee Agenda #1,
prepared for BOARD MEETING DATE:
March 4, 2016, page 3).
6. Does the rule meet the RACM and
BACM requirements under CAA
sections 172(c)(1) and 189?
Rule 2449 provides for the most
stringent in-use off-road diesel
equipment requirements that we are
aware of in the United States, and thus,
we find that the rule implements both
reasonably available and best available
control measures for this source
category. However, as discussed above,
the EPA generally takes action on a
RACM or BACM demonstration as part
of our action on the State’s attainment
demonstration for the relevant NAAQS.
Thus, while we do not know of any
more stringent requirements for this
category at this time, we are also not
taking any action on how this measure
fits within the context of a RACM or
BACM demonstration for the South
Coast area.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Mar 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
7. The EPA’s Rule Evaluation
Conclusion
Based on the above discussion, we
believe Rule 2449 and the CARB SOON
Program are consistent with the relevant
CAA requirements, policies and
guidance.
IV. Proposed Action and Public
Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA is proposing to fully
approve the submitted rule because we
believe it fulfills all relevant
requirements. We will accept comments
from the public on this proposal until
April 11, 2016. Unless we receive
convincing new information during the
comment period, we intend to publish
a final approval action that will
incorporate this rule into the federally
enforceable SIP.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
SCAQMD Rule 2449. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, this
document available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and in
hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Act. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely proposes to approve State
law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. For that reason, this proposed
action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
12641
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 25, 2016.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016–05278 Filed 3–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\10MRP1.SGM
10MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12637-12641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05278]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0819; FRL-9943-47-Region 9]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; South
Coast Air Quality Management District; Control of Oxides of Nitrogen
Emissions From Off-Road Diesel Vehicles
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD or
District) Rule 2449, Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Off-
Road Diesel Vehicles, which adopts by reference title 13, chapter 9,
section 2449.2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), ``Surplus
Off-Road Opt-In for NOX (SOON) Program,'' as part of the
SCAQMD portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
SCAQMD Rule 2449 requires certain in-use off-road vehicle fleets to
meet more stringent requirements in the South Coast area when funding
is provided by the District in order to achieve additional reductions
of oxides of Nitrogen (NOX). We are taking comments on this
proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2015-0819 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
lo.doris@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-
3959, lo.doris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of the rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?
D. What do the Off-Road Regulation and Rule 2449 require?
III. The EPA's Evaluation of the State's Submittal
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does Rule 2449 meet CAA SIP evaluation criteria?
1. Did the SCAQMD and CARB provide adequate public notice and
comment periods?
2. Do the SCAQMD and CARB have adequate legal authority to
implement the rule?
3. Is the rule enforceable as required under CAA section
110(a)(2)?
4. Does the rule interfere with reasonable further progress and
attainment or any other applicable requirement of the Act?
5. Will the State and the SCAQMD have adequate personnel and
funding for the rule?
6. Does the rule meet the RACM and BACM requirements under CAA
sections 172(c)(1) and 189?
7. The EPA's Rule Evaluation Conclusion
IV. Proposed Action and Public Comment
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Off-Road Diesel-Fueled
Fleets Regulation (13 CCR sections 2449, 2449.1 and 2449.2) applies to
fleets with nonroad \1\ compression-ignition vehicles and equipment
greater than 25 horsepower (hp). Sections 2449 and 2449.1 (collectively
the ``Off-Road
[[Page 12638]]
Regulation'') require fleet operators to meet a progressively more
stringent combined particulate matter (PM) and NOX standard,
or to reduce emissions through technology upgrades such as retrofit or
replacement. The Off-Road Regulation was initially approved by CARB on
July 26, 2007 and was subsequently amended in December 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Clean Air Act refers to these engines as ``nonroad''
engines and the State of California uses the term ``off-road''
engines. The terms ``nonroad'' and ``off-road'' are used
interchangeably in this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In conjunction with the Off-Road Regulation, CARB also adopted an
``opt-in'' provision that allows local air districts to achieve
additional reductions of NOX emissions by introducing
cleaner engines or control devices into a fleet with incentive funding
(see 13 CCR section 2449.2, Surplus Off-Road Opt-In for NOX
Program (also referred to as the ``CARB SOON Program'' in today's
proposed rule)). Under this provision, any California air district can
``opt-in'' to the CARB SOON Program to achieve reductions of
NOX emissions from in-use nonroad diesel-fueled vehicles
that are surplus to what is required by CARB's Off-Road Regulation. In
order to participate in the CARB SOON Program, a district's governing
board must hold a public hearing, vote to ``opt-in'' to the CARB SOON
Program, and decide whether to make the program voluntary or mandatory.
On May 2, 2008 the SCAQMD governing board held a public hearing at
which it voted to ``opt-in'' to the CARB SOON Program as a mandatory
requirement and adopted Rule 2449, Control of Oxides of Nitrogen
Emissions from Off-Road Diesel Vehicles, which includes by reference
the CARB SOON Program. The SCAQMD also adopted additional Rule 2449
Administrative Guidelines (May 2008) as required by the CARB SOON
Program to implement the program in the South Coast area. On July 11,
2014, the SCAQMD amended Rule 2449 to update the rule's reference to
the CARB SOON Program, which was amended by CARB in December 2011. The
SCAQMD Rule 2449 adopts the provisions of the CARB SOON Program found
under 13 CCR, section 2449.2 into the SCAQMD's rule book and makes the
CARB SOON Program a mandatory requirement for in-use off-road sources
located in the South Coast area.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Unless otherwise indicated, references in this notice to
Rule 2449 include the CARB Soon Program, as implemented through Rule
2449.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARB's Off-Road Regulation and the CARB SOON Program are subject to
section 209(e) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), which generally
preempts States from adopting and enforcing standards and other
requirements relating to the control of emissions from nonroad engines
(see CAA section 209(e)(1) and Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. EPA, 88 F.3d 1075
(D.C. Cir. 1996)). However, CAA section 209(e)(2)(A) requires the EPA
to authorize California to adopt and enforce standards and other
requirements relating to the control of emissions from certain nonroad
vehicles or engines, unless the EPA makes one of three enumerated
findings. On September 20, 2013 the EPA authorized CARB to enforce the
Off-Road Regulation and the CARB SOON Program (collectively ``Fleet
Requirements'') (see 78 FR 58090-58121, September 20, 2013).
On November 12, 2015, the EPA proposed to approve the Fleet
Requirements into the California SIP (see 80 FR 69915).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In particular, the EPA proposed to approve 13 CCR sections
2449 (excluding subsection 2449(d)(2)), 2449.1, and 2449.2 into the
SIP. 80 FR 69918, Table 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
On July 18, 2008, the State of California submitted SCAQMD Rule
2449, ``Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Off-Road
Vehicles,'' which was adopted by the District on May 2, 2008 (see July
18, 2008 letter from Michael H. Scheible, Deputy Executive Officer,
CARB, to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, with
attachments).
On September 5, 2014, the state submitted a revision to Rule 2449
adopted by the District on July 11, 2014. The submittal made a minor
administrative revision to the numbering of the referenced CARB SOON
Program, which was revised by CARB in December 2011, from section
2449.3 to section 2449.2 (see September 5, 2014 letter to Jared
Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, from Richard W.
Corey, Executive Officer, Air Resources Board with attachments).
The July 18, 2008 submittal was deemed complete by operation of law
under CAA section 110(k)(1)(B) on January 18, 2009. The September 5,
2014 submittal was deemed complete by operation of law under CAA
section 110(k)(1)(B) on March 5, 2015.
B. Are there other versions of the rule?
There are no previous versions of Rule 2449 in the SIP for the
SCAQMD.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?
NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and fine
particulate matter (PM2.5), which harm human health and the
environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit
regulations that control NOX emissions. In addition, section
172(c)(1) of the Act requires implementation of all reasonably
available control measures (RACM) as expeditiously as practicable in
nonattainment areas. Because the South Coast area is designated
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone standard, the 1997 annual and 24-
hour PM2.5 standard, the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
standard, the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard, the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard and the 2008 8-hour ozone standard (see 40 CFR part
81.305), CARB and the SCAQMD must implement RACM for NOX
(among other pollutants) under CAA section 172(c)(1). In addition,
under subpart 4 of the CAA, serious PM2.5 areas are required
to adopt best available control measures (BACM) for PM2.5
and its precursors.\4\ On January 13, 2016, the EPA reclassified the
South Coast PM2.5 nonattainment area as a Serious
nonattainment area for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS (81 FR 1514).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The EPA generally takes action on a RACM or BACM
demonstration as part of our action on the State's attainment
demonstration for the relevant NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-road diesel vehicles collectively represent one of the largest
sources of NOX emissions in the South Coast Air Basin.\5\
The purpose of Rule 2449 is to achieve surplus NOX
reductions from this source category beyond those required under CARB's
Off-Road Regulation with funding provided by the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD's
2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) relies on NOX
reductions from Rule 2449 to attain the one-hour and 1997 eight-hour
ozone NAAQS.\6\ Rule 2449 is expected to achieve 7.5 tons per day (tpd)
of NOX reductions in 2023.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See, e.g., Draft Staff Report, Proposed Amended Rule 2449--
Control of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Off-Road Diesel
Vehicles, page 1 (May 2014).
\6\ See 2012 AQMP, Table 4-6, page 4-33, OFFRD-01, Extension of
the SOON Provision for Construction/Industrial Equipment
[NOX] and Appendix IV-B, pages IV-B-30 thru IV-B-32.
\7\ Id. The EPA is not proposing to approve the emission
reductions in today's proposed rule. Emission reductions or SIP
credit from Rule 2449 will be addressed in future EPA actions on
attainment plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. What do the Off-Road Regulation and Rule 2449 require?
In general, CARB's Off-Road Regulation applies to all diesel-fueled
off-road fleet equipment owners operating in the State of California.
The Off-Road Regulation has performance requirements depending on the
size of the fleet (i.e., a large fleet is defined as a fleet having
greater than 5,000 horsepower (hp), a small fleet has less
[[Page 12639]]
than or equal to 2,500 hp, and a medium fleet is in between) \8\ and
provides calculation methodologies for determining a fleet average
index and a fleet average target rate. Each year, each subject fleet
must demonstrate that its fleet average index was less than or equal to
the applicable fleet average target rate or that it met Best Available
Control Technology (BACT) requirements by performing turnover or
installing verified diesel emission control strategies (VDECS).\9\ As
discussed above, the EPA has authorized CARB to implement the Off-Road
Regulation under CAA section 209(e) (78 FR 58090) and has proposed to
approve the Off-Road Regulation into the California SIP (80 FR 69915).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See CARB's Off-Road Regulation, section 2449(c)(24),
definition of ``Fleet size category.''
\9\ See CARB's Off-Road Regulation, section 2449.1(a) Fleet
Average Requirements, 2449.1(b) BACT Requirements, and Appendix A
with table of ``Emission Factors by Horsepower and Year (g/bhp-
hr).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD Rule 2449 focuses on the largest fleets with the oldest
engines and requires these fleets to meet more stringent fleet average
targets than those required by section 2449.1(a) of the Off-Road
Regulation. In general, Rule 2449 applies to the owners \10\ of off-
road vehicles that operate within the SCAQMD and that are part of
fleets with more than 40 percent Tier 0 and Tier 1 vehicles \11\ (as of
January 1, 2008) and with more than 20,000 horsepower (hp) in maximum
power on a statewide basis (excluding the hp from engines in two-engine
vehicles and the hp from single cranes formerly subject to the Cargo
Handling Equipment Regulation).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Most provisions of the CARB SOON Program apply to fleets
rather than fleet owners or operators (see e.g. sections
2449.2(b)(2) and (d)(1)). However, SCAQMD Rule 2449 makes these
requirements applicable to the owners of off-road vehicles that
operate in SCAQMD and meet the criteria in 13 CCR 2449.2(b)(2).
\11\ See 13 CCR section 2449(c)(48) and (49) for definitions of
Tier 0 and Tier 1 engines.
\12\ See 13 CCR section 2449.2(b)(2), adopted by reference under
SCAQMD Rule 2449.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once the District issues a solicitation for applications for
funding under Rule 2449, subject fleet owners are required to meet the
more stringent fleet average targets required by the CARB SOON Program
or apply for incentive funding for a sufficient number of projects
(e.g., repowers, purchases, replacements) to meet the CARB SOON Program
fleet average targets (reproduced in Table 1 below).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 13 CCR section 2449.2(d). Thus, for example, the Off-
Road Regulation requires ``large'' fleets to meet a fleet average
target of 1.5 g/bhp-hr for 175-750 hp engines and 3.4 g/bhp-hr for
greater than 750 hp engines in the year 2023, whereas Rule 2449 and
the CARB SOON Program require a fleet average target of 0.7 g/bhp-hr
for 175-750 hp engines and 2.7 g/bhp-hr for greater than 750 hp
engines in 2023.
Table 1--SOON Target for Each Max Hp Group for Use in Calculating SOON Fleet Average Target Rates
[g/bhp-hr]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance date: Jan 1 of year 25-49 hp 50-74 hp 75-99 hp 100-174 hp 175-299 hp 300-599 hp 600-750 hp >750 hp
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011............................................ 5.6 6.2 6.7 6.0 5.4 5.1 5.3 6.4
2014............................................ 5.8 6.5 7.1 6.4 3.9 3.7 3.7 5.3
2017............................................ 5.0 5.4 5.5 4.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 4.3
2020............................................ 4.1 4.2 3.4 3.1 1.4 1.3 1.4 3.4
2023............................................ 3.3 3.0 1.4 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.7 2.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Reproduction of Table 5 of section 2449.2(d) of CARB SOON Program. These fleet average target rates are more stringent than what is required
under the Off-Road Regulation (see 13 CCR section 2449.1(a)(1), Table 3).
Specifically, subject fleet owners are required to submit a report
with information on, including but not limited to, the fleet owner,
vehicle types and uses of each vehicle, engines used to power the
vehicles and the type and use of each engine, and VDECS installed on
engines. 13 CCR section 2449.2(d)(1)(A)). Fleets must calculate their
fleet average index based on the equipment they have and compare it to
the fleet average target rate based on the SOON target rates shown in
Table 1 above (13 CCR section 2449.2(d)(1)(B) and (C)), and if their
fleet average index is greater than the SOON fleet average target rate,
they are required to apply for funding (13 CCR section
2449.2(d)(1)(D)). Fleets must apply for funding in accordance with the
Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program (Carl
Moyer Program) \14\ policies and procedures and also with the
Administrative Guidelines \15\ adopted by the SCAQMD, which provide
further clarification on what to include in the funding applications
and compliance plans. Funding applications and compliance plans must
together demonstrate that equipment identified for the CARB SOON
Program funding will result in surplus \16\ reductions in order to
qualify for incentive funding. Once a fleet receives funding for a
qualified project, the fleet is required to implement the project. The
SCAQMD has approved significant funding for the implementation of Rule
2449. The 2012 AQMP states that the District Governing Board has
allocated up to $30 million per year for the program and extended the
SOON Program to 2023 (see Final 2012 AQMP: Appendix IV-B, p. IV-B-31).
For ``FY 2015-2016,'' or ``Year 18'' of the Carl Moyer Memorial Air
Quality Standards Attainment Program, the SCAQMD expects that
approximately $5 million of funding will be available for the SCAQMD
SOON Program (see DRAFT Technology Committee Agenda
[[Page 12640]]
#1, prepared for BOARD MEETING DATE: March 4, 2016, page 3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Carl Moyer Program funds are used to fund Rule 2449
with the requirement that all projects meet, at a minimum, the Carl
Moyer Program's latest requirements and guidelines (e.g., project
selection criteria, co-funding requirements, and reporting and
monitoring requirements). For more information on the Carl Moyer
Program, see https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/moyer/moyer.htm.
\15\ In addition to the Carl Moyer Program guidelines, the CARB
SOON Program requires the District to adopt District guidelines,
through a public process, that include additional administrative
provisions necessary to implement the CARB SOON Program. These
provisions include, but are not limited to, funding guidelines,
compliance planning requirements and reporting and monitoring
requirements. The SCAQMD adopted these additional district
guidelines on May 22, 2008 (see Draft Administrative Guidelines,
Proposed Rule 2449 Administrative Guidelines, SCAQMD, May 2008). The
SCAQMD Board plans to consider amendments to the May 2008
Administrative Guidelines on March 4, 2016 (see DRAFT Technology
Committee Agenda #1, prepared for BOARD MEETING DATE: March 4, 2016,
with Attachment 4, SOON Provision Implementation Guidelines). The
amendments include referencing the correct section of CARB's Off-
Road Regulation and aligning funding levels for the SCAQMD SOON
Program with the Carl Moyer program. If approved by the SCAQMD
Board, the EPA expects the SCAQMD to forward the amendments to CARB
for approval.
\16\ Surplus reductions are those NOX reductions that
are not needed for meeting the requirements of the Off-Road
Regulation. If surplus reductions are available and used to meet the
requirements of Rule 2449 and the CARB SOON Program, then those
reductions cannot be used to meet the requirements of the Off-Road
Regulation until they are no longer needed for compliance with Rule
2449.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. The EPA's Evaluation of the State's Submittal
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
The EPA has evaluated Rule 2449 against the applicable procedural
and substantive CAA requirements for SIPs and SIP revisions and has
concluded that it meets all of the applicable requirements.
Generally, SIPs must include enforceable emission limitations and
other control measures, means, or techniques, as well as schedules and
timetables for compliance, as may be necessary to meet the requirements
of the Act (see CAA section 110(a)(2)(A)); must provide necessary
assurances that the State will have adequate personnel, funding, and
authority under State law to carry out such SIP (and is not prohibited
by any provision of Federal to State law from carrying out such SIP)
(see CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)); must be adopted by a State after
reasonable notice and public hearing (see CAA section 110(l)), and must
not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the
Act (see CAA section 110(l)).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ CAA section 193, which prohibits any pre-1990 SIP control
requirement relating to nonattainment pollutants in nonattainment
areas from being modified unless the SIP is revised to insure
equivalent or greater emission reductions of such air pollutants,
does not apply to this rule because it does not include any pre-1990
SIP control requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, as noted above, CARB and the SCAQMD must implement
RACM for NOX (among other pollutants) under CAA section
172(c)(1).
B. Does Rule 2449 meet CAA SIP evaluation criteria?
1. Did the SCAQMD and CARB provide adequate public notice and comment
periods?
Under CAA section 110(l), SIP revisions must be adopted by the
State, and the State must provide for reasonable public notice and
hearing prior to adoption. In 40 CFR 51.102(d), we specify that
reasonable public notice in this context refers to at least 30 days.
The State has submitted evidence of public notice and hearing prior to
the May 5, 2008 adoption and July 11, 2014 amendment of Rule 2449 by
the SCAQMD (see attachments to July 18, 2008 letter to Mr. Wayne
Nastri, EPA Region 9 from Michael H. Scheible, Air Resource Board and
attachments to September 5, 2014 letter to Mr. Jared Blumenfeld, EPA
Region 9, from Richard W. Corey, Air Resources Board). Based on the
evidence provided by the SCAQMD and CARB, we conclude that they have
provided adequate public notice and comment periods.
2. Do the SCAQMD and CARB have adequate legal authority to implement
the rule?
California air districts are authorized to adopt and enforce rules
by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section 40001. CARB is
authorized to adopt the rules as revisions to the SIP by H&SC section
39601, 39602, and 41650 through 41652 (see CARB Executive Order S-14-
012).
In addition, we note that California H&SC sections 43013(a) and
43018 provide CARB with broad authority to achieve the maximum feasible
and cost-effective emission reductions from all mobile source
categories, including both on-road and off-road diesel engines.
As discussed above, CARB's Off-Road Regulation is subject to CAA
section 209(e), and on September 20, 2013 the EPA granted CARB's
request for authorization to enforce its Fleet Requirements, including
the CARB SOON Program (see 78 FR 58090-58121, September 20, 2013).
Thus, we find that the SCAQMD and CARB have adequate legal authority to
adopt and implement Rule 2449.
3. Is the rule enforceable as required under CAA section 110(a)(2)?
We have evaluated the enforceability of Rule 2449 and the CARB SOON
Program with respect to applicability and exemptions; standard of
conduct and compliance dates; sunset provisions; discretionary
provisions; and test methods, recordkeeping and reporting,\18\ and have
concluded for the reasons given below that the rule is enforceable for
the purposes of CAA section 110(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ These concepts are discussed in detail in an EPA memorandum
from J. Craig Potter, EPA Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation, et al., titled ``Review of State Implementation Plans and
Revisions for Enforceability and Legal Sufficiency,'' dated
September 23, 1987.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, with respect to applicability, we find Rule 2449 and the
CARB SOON Program to be sufficiently clear as to which fleet owners and
which vehicles or engines are subject to the program and the rule (see
Rule 2449 and 13 CCR section 2449.2(b)). In general, the rule applies
to owners of vehicles that operate within the SCAQMD and are part of a
fleet consisting of 40 percent Tier 0 and Tier 1 vehicles with greater
than 20,000 hp statewide, excluding the hp from engines in two-engine
vehicles and single engine cranes formerly subject to the Cargo
Handling Equipment Regulation (see 13 CCR 2449.2(b)(2)).
Second, we find that Rule 2449 and the CARB SOON Program are
sufficiently specific so that the persons affected are fairly on notice
as to what the requirements and related compliance dates are. We have
described the substantive requirements and compliance dates set forth
in Rule 2449 in section II.D. of today's proposed rule.
Third, the requirements of Rule 2449 will sunset at different times
from 2011 through 2023, depending on when the SCAQMD issues its
solicitations for funding; however, once a fleet is no longer subject
to Rule 2449, it will be then be subject to the requirements of the
Off-Road Regulation.
Fourth, Rule 2449 contains a provision that allows for discretion
on the part of CARB's Executive Officer (EO), this provision is limited
both in scope and application, and is no longer relevant since the date
to request discretion has passed (see 13 CCR section 2449.2(e)(2),
allowing a fleet to apply to the EO for an extension from the
requirements if the rule calculations would require a fleet to turn
over Tier 2 or better engines before January 1, 2014). As such, we find
that this provision does not undermine the enforceability of Rule 2449
or preclude its approval into the SIP.
Lastly, Rule 2449 identifies appropriate calculation requirements
and includes adequate recordkeeping and reporting requirements
sufficient to ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. In
particular, as described above, once the SCAQMD issues a solicitation,
each subject fleet owner must submit a report containing detailed
information about each vehicle and engine in the fleet, each VDECS
installed on an engine in the fleet, and other information related to
compliance with the Off-Road Rule (see 13 CCR 2449(d)(1)(A) and
2449(g). If the fleet average index is greater than the SOON fleet
average target rate, the fleet owner must apply for SOON funding (13
CCR 2449.2(d)(1)(B)). If the necessary NOX retrofits,
repower, or vehicle replacements are available, the application must
indicate how these retrofits, repowers, or vehicle replacements would
bring the fleet average index for vehicles that operate within the
SCAQMD to less than or equal to the SOON fleet average target rate (13
CCR 2449.2(d)(1)(D)). In addition, the fleet owner must prepare and
submit a compliance plan laying out the actions it is required to take
[[Page 12641]]
under section 2449.1 and the actions for which it is applying to the
SCAQMD for funding under section 2449.2 (13 CCR 2449.2(e)(3)).
4. Does the rule interfere with reasonable further progress and
attainment or any other applicable requirement of the Act?
As discussed above, the SCAQMD's 2012 AQMP relies on NOX
reductions from Rule 2449 to attain the one-hour and 1997 eight-hour
ozone NAAQS. The EPA has approved SCAQMD's commitment to implement the
SOON Program as part of the SCAQMD's aggregate NOX emissions
reductions commitment (see 79 FR 29712, 29720 and 29721). Approval of
Rule 2449 into the SIP will help fulfill this commitment. Thus, the EPA
believes that approval of Rule 2449 does not interfere with Reasonable
Further Progress, attainment or any other applicable requirement of the
Act.
5. Will the State and the SCAQMD have adequate personnel and funding
for the rule?
As discussed above, the SCAQMD has approved significant funding for
the implementation of Rule 2449. The 2012 AQMP states that the SCAQMD
Board has allocated up to $30 million per year for the program and
extended the SOON Program to 2023 (see Final 2012 AQMP: Appendix IV-B,
p. IV-B-31). For ``FY 2015-2016,'' or ``Year 18'' of the Carl Moyer
Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program, the SCAQMD expects
to have approximately $5 million of funding available for the SCAQMD
SOON Program (see DRAFT Technology Committee Agenda #1, prepared for
BOARD MEETING DATE: March 4, 2016, page 3).
6. Does the rule meet the RACM and BACM requirements under CAA sections
172(c)(1) and 189?
Rule 2449 provides for the most stringent in-use off-road diesel
equipment requirements that we are aware of in the United States, and
thus, we find that the rule implements both reasonably available and
best available control measures for this source category. However, as
discussed above, the EPA generally takes action on a RACM or BACM
demonstration as part of our action on the State's attainment
demonstration for the relevant NAAQS. Thus, while we do not know of any
more stringent requirements for this category at this time, we are also
not taking any action on how this measure fits within the context of a
RACM or BACM demonstration for the South Coast area.
7. The EPA's Rule Evaluation Conclusion
Based on the above discussion, we believe Rule 2449 and the CARB
SOON Program are consistent with the relevant CAA requirements,
policies and guidance.
IV. Proposed Action and Public Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is proposing
to fully approve the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all
relevant requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this
proposal until April 11, 2016. Unless we receive convincing new
information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final
approval action that will incorporate this rule into the federally
enforceable SIP.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference SCAQMD Rule 2449. The EPA has made, and will continue to
make, this document available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 25, 2016.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016-05278 Filed 3-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P