Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption; State of Idaho, Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), 12443-12445 [2016-05243]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
intended to, and does not as a matter of
law, preclude enforcement of the SIP
provisions in question through any
other means authorized by federal law,
including, but not limited to, the CAA.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve
Massachusetts’ May 5, 2015 SIP
revision. Specifically, EPA is proposing
to approve Massachusetts revised
regulations 310 CMR 7.24(3),
Distribution of Motor Vehicle Fuel, 310
CMR 7.24(4), Motor Vehicle Fuel Tank
Trucks, and 310 CMR 7.24(6),
Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel, as
well as new and revised definitions, in
310 CMR 7.00, Air Pollution Control,
that relate to Stage I and Stage II vapor
recovery systems, and incorporate these
regulations into the Massachusetts SIP.
EPA is proposing to approve this SIP
revision because it meets all applicable
requirements of the CAA and EPA
guidance, and it will not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
NAAQS attainment and reasonable
further progress or with any other
applicable requirement of the Clean Air
Act.
Massachusetts’ May 5, 2015 SIP
revision satisfies the ‘‘comparable
measures’’ requirement of CAA section
184(b)(2), because as stated in EPA’s
Guidance Document, ‘‘the comparable
measures requirement is satisfied if
phasing out a Stage II control program
in a particular area is estimated to have
no, or a de minimis, incremental loss of
area-wide emissions control.’’ As noted
above, Massachusetts’ SIP revision met
de minimis criteria outlined in EPA’s
Guidance Document. In addition, since
the resulting temporary emissions
increase from the removal of Stage II
controls are de minimis, the anti-back
sliding requirements of CAA section
110(l) have also been satisfied.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this document or
on other relevant matters. These
comments will be considered before
taking final action. Interested parties
may participate in the Federal
rulemaking procedure by submitting
written comments to this proposed rule
by following the instructions listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this Federal
Register.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Massachusetts’ 310 CMR 7.00, Air
Pollution Control: Definitions; 310 CMR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
7.24(3), Distribution of Motor Vehicle
Fuel; 310 CMR 7.24(4), Motor Vehicle
Fuel Tank Trucks; and 310 CMR 7.24(6)
Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the
appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12443
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or and
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: February 19, 2016.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. 2016–05027 Filed 3–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 395
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0489]
Commercial Driver’s License
Standards: Application for Exemption;
State of Idaho, Idaho Transportation
Department (ITD)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for
exemption; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces that the
Division of Motor Vehicles, Idaho
Transportation Department (ITD), has
applied for an exemption from
provisions of 49 CFR 383.75(a)(8)(v) that
require third-party commercial driver
license (CDL) testers to initiate and
maintain a bond in an amount
determined by the State to be sufficient
to pay for re-testing drivers in the event
that the third party or one or more of its
examiners is involved in fraudulent
activities related to conducting skills
testing of CDL applicants. FMCSA
requests public comment on IDT’s
application for exemption.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
12444
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Comments must be received on
or before April 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Number
FMCSA–2015–0489 by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Each submission must include the
Agency name and the docket number for
this notice. Note that DOT posts all
comments received without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a
comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time or visit Room W12–140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The on-line FDMS is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information concerning this notice,
contact Mr. Richard Clemente, FMCSA
Driver and Carrier Operations Division;
Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; Telephone: 202–366–
4325. Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate
by submitting comments and related
materials regarding this application for
exemption. Comments should address
the safety assessment provided by the
applicant.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA–2015–0489), indicate
the specific section of this document to
which the comment applies, and
provide a reason for suggestions or
recommendations. You may submit
your comments and material online or
by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means.
FMCSA recommends that you include
your name and a mailing address, an
email address, or a phone number in the
body of your document so the Agency
can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comments online, go
to www.regulations.gov and put the
docket number, ‘‘FMCSA–2015–0489’’
in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and click
‘‘Search.’’ When the new screen
appears, click on ‘‘Comment Now!’’
button and type your comment into the
text box in the following screen. Choose
whether you are submitting your
comment as an individual or on behalf
of a third party and then submit. An
option to upload a file is provided. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. FMCSA will
consider all comments and material
received during the comment period
and may grant or not grant this
application based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315(b) to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations, including the CDL
regulations in 49 CFR part 383. See also
49 CFR 381.300(c)(2), FMCSA must
publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1)
and 49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Agency must be published in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b))
with the reasons for denying or granting
the application and, if granted, the name
of the person or class of persons
receiving the exemption, and the
regulatory provision from which the
exemption is granted. The notice must
also specify the effective period and
explain the terms and conditions of the
exemption. The exemption may be
renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
The Idaho Transportation Department
(ITD) is the State of Idaho governmental
organization responsible for state
transportation infrastructure. The
Agency is responsible for overseeing the
disbursement of Federal, State, and
grant funding for the transportation
programs of the State. IDT’s CDL
program is designed to improve safety
on the highways while meeting Federal
requirements for the testing and
licensing of commercial drivers.
Idaho is a geographically large state
with a relatively small population. To
adequately serve their constituents, the
ITD oversees a third-party tester
program consisting of approximately 60
CDL examiners. ITD utilizes contractors
as the third-party examiners, so these
examiners are not considered
government employees, who would not
need to be bonded.
The IDT has applied for an exemption
from the regulations in 49 CFR
383.75(a)(8)(v) that require third-party
testers to initiate and maintain a bond
in an amount determined by the State to
be sufficient to pay for re-testing drivers
in the event that the third party or one
or more of its examiners is involved in
fraudulent activities related to
conducting skills testing of CDL
applicants. The ITD requests the
exemption because this regulation
creates a financial hardship for testing
examiners who must be bonded but
conduct only a few tests monthly and
the State of Idaho has had no instances
of fraud in their third-party testing
organizations. IDT believes that the
exemption, if granted, would achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to or
greater than the level of safety provided
by complying with the regulation.
According to IDT, most of their
examiners work in small cities and
towns scattered throughout the State of
Idaho. Many of these examiners only
conduct one or two CDL tests per
month. The cost of requiring these
examiners to be bonded creates a
financial hardship for the examiners
who earn just $60 per test. This
regulation results in some badly-needed
examiners potentially dropping out of
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the CDL testing arena. The State of
Idaho is self-insured, in that Idaho state
employee staff members are qualified
and available to re-test any applicants
who may be found to have given a CDL
‘‘tainted’’ by some type of fraud. This
would be done at no cost to the
applicants.
In support of their request, the ITD
indicates that it uses, and has used for
over a year now, the Commercial Skills
Test Information Management System
(CSTIMS) to monitor CDL skills test
examiners and to improve safety. This
Internet-based tool provides a consistent
way to track the scheduling and entry of
test results for CDL skills tests by
jurisdiction and third-party examiners.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
CSTIMS enforces jurisdiction-defined
rules to manage CDL skills testing and
will alert jurisdictions when
circumstances are encountered that may
require investigation to determine if
fraud may have occurred. CSTIMS also
produces reports that can be reviewed
for patterns of potential fraud, and
surveys are also sent to all individuals
tested to help monitor Idaho’s testing
program and detect fraud.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or
Greater Level of Safety
ITD states that granting this
exemption will result in a level of safety
that is equal to or greater than the level
of safety of the rule without the
exemption. According to the application
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
12445
for exemption, Idaho has had no
instances of fraud in its third-party
testing organizations. ITD requests,
therefore, that FMCSA approve this
request based on the alternate measures
they have put in place supporting the
spirit and purpose of 49 CFR
383.75(a)(8)(v) and, in its view, provide
an equivalent or greater level of safety.
A copy of ITD’s application for
exemption is available for review in the
docket for this notice.
Issued on: February 26, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–05243 Filed 3–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12443-12445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05243]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 395
[Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0489]
Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption;
State of Idaho, Idaho Transportation Department (ITD)
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that the Division of Motor Vehicles, Idaho
Transportation Department (ITD), has applied for an exemption from
provisions of 49 CFR 383.75(a)(8)(v) that require third-party
commercial driver license (CDL) testers to initiate and maintain a bond
in an amount determined by the State to be sufficient to pay for re-
testing drivers in the event that the third party or one or more of its
examiners is involved in fraudulent activities related to conducting
skills testing of CDL applicants. FMCSA requests public comment on
IDT's application for exemption.
[[Page 12444]]
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Number FMCSA-2015-0489 by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, contact Mr. Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: 202-366-4325. Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials regarding this application for exemption. Comments
should address the safety assessment provided by the applicant.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2015-0489), indicate the specific section of this
document to which the comment applies, and provide a reason for
suggestions or recommendations. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so the Agency can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comments online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2015-0489'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. An option to upload a
file is provided. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. FMCSA will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may grant or not grant this application based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b) to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations, including the CDL regulations in 49 CFR part 383. See also
49 CFR 381.300(c)(2), FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must
provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant
to the application, including any safety analyses that have been
conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1) and 49 CFR
381.305). The decision of the Agency must be published in the Federal
Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting
the application and, if granted, the name of the person or class of
persons receiving the exemption, and the regulatory provision from
which the exemption is granted. The notice must also specify the
effective period and explain the terms and conditions of the exemption.
The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) is the State of Idaho
governmental organization responsible for state transportation
infrastructure. The Agency is responsible for overseeing the
disbursement of Federal, State, and grant funding for the
transportation programs of the State. IDT's CDL program is designed to
improve safety on the highways while meeting Federal requirements for
the testing and licensing of commercial drivers.
Idaho is a geographically large state with a relatively small
population. To adequately serve their constituents, the ITD oversees a
third-party tester program consisting of approximately 60 CDL
examiners. ITD utilizes contractors as the third-party examiners, so
these examiners are not considered government employees, who would not
need to be bonded.
The IDT has applied for an exemption from the regulations in 49 CFR
383.75(a)(8)(v) that require third-party testers to initiate and
maintain a bond in an amount determined by the State to be sufficient
to pay for re-testing drivers in the event that the third party or one
or more of its examiners is involved in fraudulent activities related
to conducting skills testing of CDL applicants. The ITD requests the
exemption because this regulation creates a financial hardship for
testing examiners who must be bonded but conduct only a few tests
monthly and the State of Idaho has had no instances of fraud in their
third-party testing organizations. IDT believes that the exemption, if
granted, would achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to or
greater than the level of safety provided by complying with the
regulation.
According to IDT, most of their examiners work in small cities and
towns scattered throughout the State of Idaho. Many of these examiners
only conduct one or two CDL tests per month. The cost of requiring
these examiners to be bonded creates a financial hardship for the
examiners who earn just $60 per test. This regulation results in some
badly-needed examiners potentially dropping out of
[[Page 12445]]
the CDL testing arena. The State of Idaho is self-insured, in that
Idaho state employee staff members are qualified and available to re-
test any applicants who may be found to have given a CDL ``tainted'' by
some type of fraud. This would be done at no cost to the applicants.
In support of their request, the ITD indicates that it uses, and
has used for over a year now, the Commercial Skills Test Information
Management System (CSTIMS) to monitor CDL skills test examiners and to
improve safety. This Internet-based tool provides a consistent way to
track the scheduling and entry of test results for CDL skills tests by
jurisdiction and third-party examiners. CSTIMS enforces jurisdiction-
defined rules to manage CDL skills testing and will alert jurisdictions
when circumstances are encountered that may require investigation to
determine if fraud may have occurred. CSTIMS also produces reports that
can be reviewed for patterns of potential fraud, and surveys are also
sent to all individuals tested to help monitor Idaho's testing program
and detect fraud.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
ITD states that granting this exemption will result in a level of
safety that is equal to or greater than the level of safety of the rule
without the exemption. According to the application for exemption,
Idaho has had no instances of fraud in its third-party testing
organizations. ITD requests, therefore, that FMCSA approve this request
based on the alternate measures they have put in place supporting the
spirit and purpose of 49 CFR 383.75(a)(8)(v) and, in its view, provide
an equivalent or greater level of safety.
A copy of ITD's application for exemption is available for review
in the docket for this notice.
Issued on: February 26, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-05243 Filed 3-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P