Section 542(c) Housing Finance Agencies Risk-Sharing Program: Revisions to Regulations, 12051-12062 [2016-04595]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
generally requires agencies to prepare a
statement before proposing any rule that
may result in an annual expenditure of
$100 million or more by State, local, or
tribal governments, or by the private
sector. This rule will not result in any
such expenditure, nor will it
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
D. The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and import markets.
E. Executive Order 12866
The Department of State does not
assess or collect fines under INA section
273. Neither this proposed Department
of State rule, nor prior versions of this
regulation, address fines against
carriers. However, the November 20,
2009, opinion from the United States
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit requires joint rulemaking by the
Department of State and DHS for the
DHS rule to take effect. United Airlines,
Inc. v. Brien, 588 F.3d 158, 179 (2d Cir.
2009). For a full economic analysis of
the jointly proposed DHS rule,
including Regulatory Flexibility and
Regulatory Impact Analyses, see the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for 8
CFR 212.1(g), RIN 1651–AA97.
F. Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563 and affirms that
this regulation is consistent with the
guidance therein.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
H. Executive Order 13175—
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply to this
rulemaking.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose or revise
information collections subject to the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration,
Passports and Visas, Students
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the State Department
proposes to amend 22 CFR part 41 as
follows:
PART 41 VISAS: DOCUMENTATION OF
NONIMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
ACT, AS AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 41 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 8 U.S.C. 1104;
Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681–795 through
2681–801; 8 U.S.C. 1185 note (section 7209
of Pub. L. 108–458, as amended by section
546 of Pub. L. 109–295).
2. Section 41.2 is amended by revising
paragraph (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 41.2 Exemption or Waiver by Secretary
of State and Secretary of Homeland
Security of passport and/or visa
requirements for certain categories of
nonimmigrants.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Individual cases of unforeseen
emergencies. Except as provided in
paragraphs (a) through (h) and (j)
through (l) of this section, all
nonimmigrants are required to present a
valid, unexpired visa and passport upon
arrival in the United States. A
nonimmigrant may apply for a waiver of
the visa and passport requirement if,
either prior to the nonimmigrant’s
embarkation abroad or upon arrival at a
port of entry, the officer in charge of the
port of entry concludes that the
nonimmigrant is unable to present the
required documents because of an
unforeseen emergency. The DHS district
director may grant a waiver of the visa
or passport requirement pursuant to
INA 212(d)(4)(A), without the prior
concurrence of the Department of State,
if the DHS district director concludes
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12051
that the a nonimmigrant’s claim of
emergency circumstances is legitimate
and that approval of the waiver would
be appropriate under all of the attendant
facts and circumstances.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 24, 2016.
David T. Donahue,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Consular
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–05136 Filed 3–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 266
[Docket No FR–5881–P–01]
RIN 2502–AJ35
Section 542(c) Housing Finance
Agencies Risk-Sharing Program:
Revisions to Regulations
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Through the Section 542(c)
HFA Risk-Sharing program, HUD enters
into risk-sharing agreements with State
and local housing finance agencies
(HFAs) so that HFAs can provide more
insurance and credit for multifamily
loans. This proposed rule would amend
existing regulations for the program so
that they better align with policies for
other HUD programs, reflect current
industry and HUD practices, and
conform to statutory amendments.
Additionally, this proposed rule would
provide HUD with greater flexibility in
operating the Section 542(c) HFA RiskSharing program 0s,over time, and
would provide more flexibility for
certain HFAs accepting a greater share
of the risk of loss on mortgages insured
under the program. This proposed rule
would also update references and
terminology that are now outdated and
clarify certain provisions.
DATES: Comment Due Date: April 7,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this notice to the Regulations Division,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Communications must refer to the above
docket number and title. There are two
methods for submitting public
comments. All submissions must refer
to the above docket number and title.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
12052
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of this
document.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the
above address. Due to security measures
at the HUD Headquarters building, an
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled in
advance by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana Talios, Office of Multifamily
Production, Office of Housing,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
6156, Washington, DC 20410; telephone
number (202) 402–7125 (this is not a
toll-free number). Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Background
Section 542 of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992
(12 U.S.C. 1707 1715z–22) (Section 542)
directs HUD to carry out programs
through the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) to demonstrate
the effectiveness of providing new forms
of Federal credit enhancement for
multifamily loans. Originally enacted as
a pilot program, the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program was made a
permanent multifamily insurance
program by section 235 of title II of
Public Law 106–377,1 HUD’s Fiscal
Year 2001 appropriations act (FY 2001
HUD Appropriations Act).
The purpose of the Section 542(c)
HFA Risk-Sharing program is to provide
credit enhancement for mortgages of
multifamily housing projects whose
loans are underwritten, processed,
serviced, and disposed of by HFAs.
HUD and HFAs share in the risk of the
mortgage, which enables HFAs to
provide more insurance and credit for
multifamily loans. Under the program,
qualified State and local HFAs may
originate and underwrite affordable
housing loans including new
construction, substantial rehabilitation,
refinancing, and housing for the elderly.
HFAs may elect to share from 10 to 90
percent of the loss on a loan with HUD.
In the event of a claim, the HFA
reimburses HUD pursuant to terms of
the risk-sharing agreement.
HUD’s regulations governing the
Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing
program are set out in 24 CFR part 266.
Part 266 was last updated in the year
2000 and is now outdated in certain
respects.
II. This Proposed Rule
HUD proposes to revise 24 CFR part
266 in order to update the regulations,
to better align them with current HUD
policies and industry practices, and to
provide HUD and certain HFAs with
flexibility to operate the Section 542(c)
HFA Risk-Sharing program more
efficiently.
A. Conforming Amendments
This proposed rule would revise
sections of part 266 to conform to
Section 542(c), as it was amended by the
FY 2001 HUD Appropriations Act.
Specifically, this proposed rule would
amend part 266 to remove references to
the program being a pilot.
Additionally, this proposed rule
would amend the definition of
affordable housing in § 266.5 so that it
more closely conforms to the statutory
language of Section 542. Specifically,
1 Approved
PO 00000
October 27, 2000.
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
this proposed rule would amend the
definition of ‘‘affordable housing’’ for
the Section 542 HFA Risk-Sharing
program to mean a project that meets
the requirements for a qualified lowincome housing project under section
42(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (26
U.S.C. title 26) (IRC).
Currently, § 266.5 specifies that
affordable housing means a project in
which 20 percent or more of the units
are both rent-restricted and occupied by
families whose income is 50 percent or
less of the area median income as
determined by HUD, with adjustments
for household size, or in which 40
percent 2 or more of the units are both
rent-restricted and occupied by families
whose income is 60 percent or less of
the area median income as determined
by HUD, with adjustments for
household size. The existing definition
also says that a residential unit is rentrestricted if the gross rent with respect
to such unit does not exceed 30 percent
of the imputed income limitation
applicable to such unit.
The regulatory language unnecessarily
repeats what is already provided in
statute. Section 542(c)(7) states that
housing securing loans insured under
the section qualifies as affordable only
if the housing is occupied by very lowincome families and bears rents not
greater than the gross rent for rentrestricted residential units as
determined under section 42(g)(2) of the
IRC. Section 42(g) of the IRC provides
qualifications for low-income housing
projects to be eligible for a low-income
housing tax credit. While the definition
in Section 542 cross references only to
IRC subsection 42(g)(2), the rent limits
established in subsection (g)(2) can be
understood only through a reading of
IRC subsection (g) in its entirety as a
result of internal cross references in the
IRC statutory language. Because ‘‘gross
rent’’ and ‘‘supportive service’’ are both
defined in section 42(g) of the IRC, this
proposed rule would remove the
definitions of these two terms from
§ 266.5, but would include in the
definition of ‘‘affordable housing’’ the
provision currently in the ‘‘gross rent’’
definition that a utility allowance
includes charges for the occupancy of a
cooperative unit. The proposed
regulatory change will remove
unnecessary regulatory verbiage and
simplify the part 266 regulations.
Further, § 266.210(b) of the existing
regulations is outdated in that it
provides that compliance with the
2 Twenty five percent in New York City as a result
of section 142(d)(6) of the IRC establishing a special
rule for projects located in a specified high cost
housing area.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA) is
the responsibility of the HUD Field
Office or other responsible entity.
However, Section 542(c)(9) of the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1992, as amended by the
Multifamily Housing Property
Disposition Reform Act of 1994 (Pub. L.
103–233), provides that HUD may
provide for assumption of its
environmental review requirements.
This proposed regulation thus moves
the paragraph on NEPA compliance
requirements from § 266.210, HUDretained review functions, to a new
section, § 266.217, titled
‘‘Environmental review requirements.’’
This proposed rule would also change
the phrasing of the existing
environmental review requirements to
make it clear that Responsible Entities
assume legal responsibility for
environmental compliance, but HUD
may make a finding in accordance with
24 CFR 58.11 (Legal capacity and
performance) and may perform the
environmental review itself under 24
CFR part 50 (Protection and
enhancement of environmental quality).
Relatedly, this proposed rule would
revise § 266.300(b) and § 266.305(b),
which describe HFA responsibilities, to
reflect that the HFA has a responsibility
to arrange for the environmental review.
This proposed rule would also amend
certain sections of the regulations to
conform to other HUD regulations. The
proposed rule would revise § 266.215(e)
to reflect that HFAs must follow LeadBased Paint requirements in 24 CFR part
35, and it would also update
§ 266.220(b) to reflect HUD’s equal
access rule, which requires that HUDassisted and HUD-insured housing be
made available without regard to actual
or perceived sexual orientation, gender
identity, or marital status (See 77 FR
5662, February 3, 2012). Currently,
§ 266.220(b) states that the mortgagor
must certify that it will not discriminate
against any family because of the sex of
the head of household. This proposed
rule would update the section to state
that the mortgagor must certify that it
will provide housing without regard to
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
marital status, and will refrain from
making improper inquiries, in
accordance with 24 CFR 5.105(a)(2).
B. Updating Terminology
This proposed rule would update part
266 to eliminate references to outdated
terminology. Specifically,
§§ 266.100(a)(1), 266.110(a), and
266.120(d)(5) refer to HFAs that have or
maintain a top tier designation.
However, rating agencies no longer offer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
top tier ratings. Rather, current rating
agency practice is to provide an issuer
credit rating that evaluates the agency’s
capacity and willingness to meet its
financial commitments. The proposed
rule would replace requirements for
HFAs to have top tier designation with
requirements that they have an issuer
rating of ‘‘A’’ or better. Additionally,
§ 266.505(b)(10) refers to the General
Accounting Office, and this proposed
rule would change this to reflect the
current name of the agency: The
Government Accountability Office.
C. Revisions To Provide Greater
Flexibility
HUD proposes changing certain
requirements to provide both HUD and
HFAs that assume a larger share of the
risk with greater flexibility in operating
the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing
program.
Under § 266.100(b), HFAs with Level
II approval, that is, HFAs that assume
less than 50% of the risk of loss on
mortgages insured under the Section
542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program, must
use underwriting standards and loan
terms and conditions approved by HUD.
However, the regulations do not provide
that HUD can revisit the approval if
market conditions or risk standards
change. Many of the standards used by
HFAs with Level II approval have been
in place for more than 20 years. This
proposed rule would amend
§ 266.100(b) to provide that, every five
years, HUD will recertify the
underwriting standards, loan terms and
conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures for HFAs with
Level II approval, and may require
changes to these procedures as a
condition for continued approval.
HUD’s review would periodically
benchmark Level II HFA underwriting
standards against current FHA
standards that are analogous to the
appropriate FHA program. Additionally,
§ 266.305(a), which describes
underwriting standards for HFAs
accepting less than 50% of the risk,
would refer to the revised § 266.100(b).
Similarly, this proposed rule would
amend § 266.125(a), which describes
actions that HUD may take against HFAs
that do not comply with Section 542(c)
HFA Risk-Sharing program
requirements, to provide that one of the
actions that HUD may take is to require
the HFA to revise any or all of its
underwriting, processing, or asset
management policies as directed by the
FHA Commissioner.
This proposed rule would provide
HFAs that assume at least 50% of the
risk of loss on mortgages insured under
the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12053
program more flexibility in financing
existing properties without substantial
rehabilitation to preserve affordability
by amending § 266.200(c). Currently,
§ 266.200(c) provides that HFAs may
finance existing properties without
substantial rehabilitation if the
financing will result in the preservation
of affordable housing, project occupancy
is not less than 93 percent, the mortgage
does not exceed an amount supportable
by the lower of the units rents being
collected under the rental assistance
agreement or at similar unassisted
projects in the market area, and the
HUD-insured mortgage does not exceed
the sum of the existing indebtedness,
cost of refinancing, cost of repairs, and
reasonable transaction costs.
Additionally, HFAs that assume less
than 50 percent of the risk may not
refinance loans that had been in default
within the 12 months prior to the
application for refinancing. The
proposed rule maintains these
requirements, but eliminates the
requirement that the HUD-insured
mortgage may not exceed the sum of the
existing indebtedness, cost of
refinancing, cost of repairs, and
reasonable transaction costs for HFAs
that assume 50 percent or more of the
risk. Permitting equity take-outs under
certain conditions for refinance and
acquisition transactions is a key
preservation tool to ensure long-term
affordability. This provision is also
consistent with similar FHA programs,
and industry practice.
In order to mitigate risk to FHA,
ensure affordability of projects, and
consistent with FHA’s experience, this
proposed rule would add additional
requirements that all HFAs would have
to meet in order to finance existing
properties: Loans to be refinanced
cannot have been in default in the 12
months prior to the date of application
for refinancing, the owner must agree to
renew the housing assistance payments
(HAP) contract for a 20-year term, if
applicable, existing and post-refinance
HAP residual receipts must be set aside
to be used to reduce future HAP
payments, the property must be
maintained as affordable housing for a
period of at least 20 years, regardless of
whether the loan is prepaid, and a
capital needs assessment must be
performed and funds escrowed for all
necessary repairs and replacement
reserves funded for future capital
repairs.
Additionally, this proposed rule
would provide HFAs that assume at
least 50% of the risk of loss on Section
542(c) mortgages more flexibility by
providing that certain loans need not be
regularly amortizing. Section 266.410(e)
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
12054
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
would be revised so that loans of HFAs
that assume at least 50% of the risk
would not need to be regularly
amortizing if they have a minimum term
of 17 years and HUD has approved the
HFA’s underwriting standards, loan
terms and conditions, and asset
management and servicing procedures.
Non-fully amortizing (also known as
‘‘balloon’’) loans are not unusual
multifamily lending options. The
change will align the 542(c) program
with conventional industry practices,
particularly for Low Income Housing
Tax Credits (LIHTC) transactions.
Moreover, balloon loans with similar
terms are typical in HUD’s section
542(b) Risk Share program, under which
HUD enters into reinsurance agreements
with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the
Federal Housing Finance Board, and
other Qualified Financial Institutions
(QFIs).
Further, this proposed rule would
revise § 266.620, which explains
circumstances under which the contract
of insurance would terminate. This
proposed rule adds flexibility by
providing that, in cases where an HFA
or its successors commits fraud or
makes a material misrepresentation,
HUD may permit HFAs that assume
more than 50% of the risk and have an
issuer rating of ‘‘A’’ or better to
indemnify HUD, or otherwise reimburse
HUD in a manner acceptable to the
Commissioner, for the full amount of
the mortgage claim in lieu of the
mortgage insurance contract being
terminated. This change would provide
flexibility for HFAs that assume more
than 50% of the risk to participate in
certain financing initiatives offered by
HUD under the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program, while protecting
the FHA General and Special Risk
Insurance Fund against losses.
D. Revisions To Reflect Current Program
Practices
In addition to amending § 266.410(e)
to provide more flexibility for certain
HFAs, this proposed rule would clarify
that the existing requirement that the
mortgage must be fully amortizing does
not apply to construction loans.
Construction loans have typically been
non-amortizing, interest-only loans
since the inception of the program, and
this is typical industry practice.
This proposed rule would also better
reflect current program practices by
removing § 266.10, entitled ‘‘Allocations
of assistance and credit subsidy.’’
Section 266.10 currently provides that
HUD will announce the availability of
assistance under the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program and invite
qualified HFAs to submit an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
application. It also provides that credit
subsidies will be obligated and allocated
in accordance with outstanding HUD
instructions. This section was relevant
when the Section 542(c) HFA RiskSharing program was a pilot program
with specific unit counts reserved for
each participating HFA. Unit allocations
and reservations of credit subsidy are no
longer required because the program is
a permanent insurance program.
Relatedly, this proposed rule would
amend § 266.105(b), which says that
applications from HFAs for approval to
participate in the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program will be submitted
in response to a notice published in the
Federal Register. In accordance with
current practice, which reflects that the
Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing
program is now permanent, this section
would now state that applications may
be submitted at any time, in the form
and manner established by HUD.
This proposed rule would clarify that
in certain circumstances, Housing for
Older Persons projects, as described in
24 CFR part 100 subpart E, qualify as
eligible projects under § 266.200.
Housing providers should be aware that
projects must comply with all program
rules and the housing for older persons
exemption to the Fair Housing Act (42
U.S.C. 3607(b); 24 CFR part 100 subpart
E) in order to exclude families with
children under 18. A housing facility
insured under the Section 542 program
may not invoke the housing for older
persons exemption to exclude children
if it also receives Federal financial
assistance pursuant to a statute or
program in which eligible families
include children under the age of 18.
For example, owners of projects that
receive rental assistance under any of
the Section 8 rental assistance programs
are bound by the definition of
‘‘families’’ and ‘‘elderly families’’ in
section 3(b)(3)(B) of the United States
Housing Act of 1937 and in
implementing regulations. Because
these definitions explicitly include
families with children, such projects are
not eligible for the exemption. The
housing for older persons exemption
allows a housing community to exclude
children under 18 years without
violating the Fair Housing Act’s
prohibition against familial status
discrimination. The Fair Housing Act
prohibits, inter alia, familial status
discrimination, which means one or
more individuals who have not attained
the age of 18 years being domiciled with
(1) a parent or another person having
legal custody of such individual or
individuals or (2) the designee of such
parent or other person having such
custody, with the written permission of
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
such parent or other person. The
protections against familial status
discrimination apply also to persons
who are pregnant or who are in the
process of securing legal custody of any
individual who is not yet 18 years old.
See 42 U.S.C. 3602(k).
The housing for older persons
exemption may be invoked if the
housing is either provided under a State
or Federal program that the Secretary of
HUD determines is specifically designed
and operated to assist elderly persons,
or, intended for and solely occupied by,
persons who are 62 years old or older,
or, intended and operated for persons
who are 55 years of age or older where
at least 80 percent of the occupied units
are occupied by at least one person who
is at least 55 years old, the housing
facility publishes and adheres to
policies and procedures that
demonstrate the intent to serve persons
55 years old and older, and, the housing
facility complies with HUD’s rules for
verification of occupancy. See 42 U.S.C.
3607(b) and 24 CFR 100.300 through
100.307.
In order to qualify for the housing for
older persons exemption, State or
Federal programs must be determined
by the Secretary to be ‘‘specifically
designed and operated to assist elderly
persons (as defined in the State or
Federal program).’’ See 42 U.S.C.
3607(b)(2)(A); 24 CFR 100.302. HUD,
however, has never designated one of its
own programs as housing for older
persons under this exemption.
Relatedly, the rulemaking proposes to
add a clause to the description of
elderly projects, at § 266.200, specifying
that an elderly family includes families
with minor children. This is to
distinguish such projects from those
that qualify for and claim an exemption
from the Fair Housing Act’s prohibition
against familial status discrimination at
42 U.S.C. 3607(b)(2).
Another change this proposed rule
would make is to § 266.420(b)(4), which
currently requires that, in periodic
advances cases, HFAs provide a
certification that periodic advances
were made proportionate to
construction progress as part of their
closing dockets. However, § 266.310,
entitled, ‘‘Insurance of advances or
insurance upon completion;
applicability of requirements,’’ does not
require periodic advances to be made
proportionate to construction progress.
This proposed rule therefore revises
§ 266.420(b)(4) to remove the
requirement that periodic advances be
proportionate to construction progress,
and instead requires that, as part of their
closing documents, in periodic
advances cases HFAs provide
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
certification that the advances were
made in accordance with the mortgage
pursuant to § 266.310.
This proposed rule would also revise
§ 266.650, Items deducted from total
loss, to clarify that where a full claim
follows a partial payment of claim by
HUD, that partial payment of claim is
considered an amount received by the
HFA that will be deducted from the
total loss to be shared by HUD and the
HFA. The existing regulatory language
does not explicitly provide this.
Another change this proposed rule
would make to reflect current program
practices is to clarify that where HUD
may direct or review an HFA’s
underwriting standards and loan terms
and conditions, it may also direct or
review that HFA’s asset management
and servicing procedures. Thus, this
proposed rule adds references to ‘‘asset
management and servicing procedures’’
throughout, and adds a new paragraph
to § 266.500 that explains that asset
management and servicing procedures
of any HFA electing to take less than 50
percent of the risk on certain projects
are subject to review, modification, and
approval by HUD.
This proposed rule also makes
changes for accuracy, such as deleting
the parenthetical in § 266.100(b)(1) that
suggests that Level I approval is where
an HFA assumes a percentage of the risk
of loss in ‘‘(increments of 10 percent),’’
because the risk percentages are not
limited to 10 percent increments.
E. Aligning Section 542(c) With Other
FHA Programs
Section 266.200(d) currently provides
that projects receiving Section 8 rental
subsidies or other rental subsidies may
be insured only if the mortgage does not
exceed an amount supportable by the
lower of contract rents under the rental
assistance agreement or market rents.
However, under HUD’s Supportive
Housing program, authorized under
section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959
(12 U.S.C. 1701q), a project may be
insured if the loan is underwritten to
contract rents, regardless of market
rents. This proposed rule would amend
§ 266.200(d) so that Supportive Housing
program projects of HFAs assuming at
least 50 percent of the risk of loss on
mortgages insured under the Section
542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program
would be subject to the same
underwriting standard as other Section
202 projects in that the loans may be
underwritten to contract rents. A similar
change is incorporated in new
§ 266.200(c)(7) for existing projects
without substantial rehabilitation. These
changes will better align requirements
between HUD programs, thereby
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
streamlining and facilitating program
administration by HFAs, as well as HUD
oversight.
FHA currently requires a National
Loan Committee to approve all large
loans under the Multifamily Accelerated
Processing (MAP) Guide as a means of
managing risk. Loans of HFAs that
assume less than 50 percent of the risk
of loss pose a similar risk to FHA as do
MAP loans. Therefore, this proposed
rule would amend § 266.305(a),
establishing the underwriting standards
for HFAs accepting less than 50 percent
of the risk, to add a provision that large
loans also require prior approval by the
FHA Commissioner. What constitutes a
large loan will be determined using the
same process currently used by HUD for
establishing large loan amounts in other
FHA programs.
This proposed rule would revise
§ 266.200(b)(2), the explanation of
substantial rehabilitation projects
eligible for the Section 542(c) HFA RiskSharing program, so that substantial
rehabilitation would occur when the
scope of work to improve an existing
project exceeds in aggregate cost a sum
equal to the base per dwelling unit limit
times the applicable high cost factor
established by the Commissioner, or
when the scope of work involves the
replacement of two or more building
systems. ‘Replacement’ is when the cost
of replacement work exceeds 50% of the
cost of replacing the entire system. The
base per dwelling unit limit is $15,000
per unit for 2015, and will be adjusted
annually based on the percentage
change in the consumer price index.
The rationale for the revision is twofold:
The current definition of substantial
rehabilitation as work that exceeds 15%
of the project’s value results in a
disproportionate impact to projects in
high cost areas, particularly for
preservation efforts that involve
moderate rehabilitation; and the
proposed change makes the program
standard comparable to other similar
FHA multifamily insurance programs
that are required to impose prevailing
wage requirements.
Additionally, this proposed rule
would revise §§ 266.600, 266.602, and
266.604, which currently refer to
specific prescribed percentages for
calculating an HFA’s mortgage
insurance premium (MIP). These set
percentages are no longer appropriate
now that the Section 542(c) HFA RiskSharing program is no longer a pilot.
This proposed rule would revise the
regulations to permit MIP changes for
the HFA Risk-Sharing program to be
published through Federal Register
notice, with an opportunity for public
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12055
comment, as is the case for other FHA
programs.
F. Editorial Changes
Finally, this proposed rule makes a
number of minor editorial changes to
improve readability and clarity, and to
ensure consistency and accuracy within
the rule. For example, this proposed
rule, throughout, adds and updates
reference citations, standardizes the
case of the term ‘‘contract of insurance,’’
replaces the term ‘‘HUD Field Office’’
with ‘‘local HUD office,’’ deletes the
term ‘‘his or her’’ where it is
unnecessary, specifies that references to
days are measured in calendar days, and
replaces a reference to the ‘‘Office of
General Counsel’’ with simply ‘‘HUD.’’
HUD also has revised § 266.225(a)(1)(i)
to clarify HUD’s intent that Davis-Bacon
wage requirements apply only where
advances that are for construction of the
project are insured under Part 266. This
intent is reflected in § 266.225(d)(2) of
the current regulation, which requires
that no advance for a project subject to
Davis-Bacon requirements shall be
insured unless a certificate is filed with
the application for the advance
certifying that the laborers and
mechanics employed in the
construction of the project have been
paid the Davis-Bacon prevailing wages.
HUD has also revised § 266.225(c) to
clarify that HUD has responsibility for
enforcing Davis-Bacon labor standards
under this section, and has revised
§ 266.630(d)(2) to clarify that partial
claim payments are limited to the
amount specified. HUD has made
similar editorial changes of this nature.
III. Justification for Reduced Comment
Period
For proposed rules issued for public
comment, it is HUD’s policy to afford
the public ‘‘not less than sixty days for
submission of comments’’ (24 CFR
10.1). In cases in which HUD
determines that a shorter public
comment period may be appropriate, it
is also HUD’s policy to provide an
explanation of why the public comment
period has been abbreviated. For the
following reasons, HUD believes that a
reduced 30-day comment period is
justified for this proposed rulemaking.
This proposed rule updates
regulations for the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program to reflect statutory
changes and to revise outdated
references. These regulatory changes are
technical and non-substantive. The
proposed rule also better aligns HUD’s
regulations with current industry and
current HUD practices and policies, and
provides greater flexibility to HUD in
operating the program and to certain
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
12056
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
HFA’s. In general, these amendments
alleviate the administrative burdens
imposed on program participants.
Further, these policy changes have
already been discussed with, and are
supported by stakeholders. From 2011–
2013, HUD discussed proposed changes
to the Risk-Sharing program with the
National Council of State Housing
Agencies (NCSHA) and a working group
of HFAs. In October, 2014, HUD
circulated a summary matrix of
proposed changes to the program to
NCSHA and HFAs and requested input
on the proposals. Comments from
NCSHA and HFAs have been
overwhelmingly supportive of almost all
of the revisions in the proposed rule.
Although HUD believes that an
abbreviated comment period is
appropriate, HUD welcomes public
input and is soliciting comments for a
period of 30-days. All comments will be
considered in the development of the
final rule.
IV. Findings and Certifications
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Review—Executive Orders
12866 and 13563
Under Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a
regulatory action is significant and
therefore, subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the requirements of the
order. Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulations and Regulatory
Review) directs executive agencies to
analyze regulations that are ‘‘outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively
burdensome, and to modify, streamline,
expand, or repeal them in accordance
with what has been learned.’’
This proposed rule updates HUD’s
regulations pertaining to Housing
Finance Agency Risk Sharing Program
for Insured Affordable Multifamily
Project Loans, codified in 24 CFR part
266. The program regulations were
initially promulgated in 1994, with the
last updates undertaken in 2000, but
only to a few regulatory sections. This
update is undertaken to reflect statutory
changes and revise outdated references
and terminology. The proposed rule also
better aligns HUD’s regulations with
current industry and current HUD
practices and policies. These changes
would not create additional significant
burdens for the public. As a result, this
rule was determined to not be a
significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
therefore was not reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The majority of the proposed
regulatory amendments would update
the regulations governing HUD’s HFA
Risk-Sharing program to conform to
current industry practices and FHA
policies with which HFAs and other
program participants are already
familiar. Other proposed regulatory
changes will provide greater flexibility
for HFAs, alleviating administrative
burden and related costs of operating
the program. While there may be some
costs for HFAs to update their practices
and procedures to reflect some of the
regulatory changes, these costs are
minimal in comparison to the
streamlining benefits provided by the
revised program regulations.
For the reasons presented, the
undersigned certifies that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has Federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments and is not
required by statute, or the rule preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This
proposed rule would not have
Federalism implications and would not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on state and local governments or
preempt state law within the meaning of
the Executive order.
Environmental Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact
with respect to the environment has
been made in accordance with HUD
regulations at 24 CFR part 50, which
implement section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The
Finding of No Significant Impact is
available for public inspection during
regular business hours in the
Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street
SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC
20410–0500. Due to security measures
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
at the HUD Headquarters building,
please schedule an appointment to
review the Finding by calling the
Regulations Division at (202) 402–3055
(this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with speech or hearing
impairments may access this number
via TTY by calling the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4;
approved March 22, 1995) (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments, and on the private
sector. This proposed rule does not
impose any Federal mandates on any
state, local, or tribal government, or on
the private sector, within the meaning of
the UMRA.
Information Collection Requirements
The information collection
requirements contained in this proposed
rule have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2502–
0500. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information, unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Program number for
the Housing Finance Agencies Section
542(c) Risk Sharing Program is 14.188.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 266
Intergovernmental relations, Low and
moderate income housing, Mortgage
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated
above, HUD proposes to amend 24 CFR
part 266 as follows:
PART 266—HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY RISK-SHARING PROGRAM
FOR INSURED AFFORDABLE
MULTIFAMILY PROJECT LOANS
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR
part 266 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1715z–22.; 42 U.S.C.
3535(d).
2. Amend part 266 by removing the
words ‘‘Contract of Insurance’’ and add
in their place the words ‘‘contract of
insurance’’ wherever they occur.
■ 3. Revise § 266.1 to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 266.1
Purpose and scope.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
f. Remove the definition of ‘‘Gross
rent’’;
■ g. Remove from the definition of
‘‘Multifamily housing’’ the word
‘‘Secretary’’ and add in its place the
word ‘‘Commissioner’’; and
■ h. Remove the definition of
‘‘Supportive services’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
(a) Authority and scope. (1) Section
542 of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C.
1715z–22), directs the Secretary of the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), acting through the
Federal Housing Administration (FHA),
to carry out programs that will provide
new forms of Federal credit
enhancement for multifamily loans.
Section 542, entitled, ‘‘Multifamily
Mortgage Credit Programs,’’ provides
insurance authority independent from
that provided by the National Housing
Act.
(2) Section 542(c) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992
specifically directs HUD to carry out a
program of risk-sharing with qualified
State and local housing finance agencies
(HFAs). The qualified HFAs are
authorized to underwrite and process
loans. HUD provides full mortgage
insurance on affordable multifamily
housing projects processed by such
HFAs under this program. Through risksharing agreements with HUD, HFAs
contract to reimburse HUD for a portion
of the loss from any defaults that occur
while HUD insurance is in force.
(3) The extent to which HUD directs
qualified HFAs regarding their
underwriting standards, loan terms and
conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures is related to the
proportion of the risk taken by an HFA.
(b) Purpose. The primary purpose of
this program is to provide credit
enhancement for multifamily loans, i.e.,
utilization of full insurance by HUD,
pursuant to risk-sharing agreements
with qualified housing finance agencies,
for the development of affordable
housing. The utilization of Federal
credit enhancements increases access to
capital markets and, thereby, increases
the supply of affordable multifamily
housing. By permitting HFAs to
underwrite, process, and service loans
and to manage and dispose of properties
that fall into default, affordable housing
is made available to eligible families
and individuals in a timely manner.
■ 4. Amend § 266.5 as follows:
■ a. Remove ‘‘, as amended’’ from the
definition of ‘‘Act’’;
■ b. Revise the definition of ‘‘Affordable
housing’’;
■ c. Remove from the definition of
‘‘Commissioner’’ the words ‘‘his or her’’
and add in their place the words ‘‘the
Commissioner’s’’;
■ d. Revise the definition of ‘‘Credit
subsidy’’;
■ e. Remove from the definition of
‘‘Designated offices’’ the words ‘‘HUD
Field Offices’’ and add in their place the
words ‘‘local HUD offices’’;
Jkt 238001
§ 266.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Affordable housing means a project
that meets the requirements for a
qualified low-income housing project
under section 42(g) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 42(g)).
For purposes of this part, the reference
to a utility allowance in 26 U.S.C. 42(g)
includes charges for the occupancy of a
cooperative unit.
*
*
*
*
*
Credit subsidy means the cost of a
direct loan or loan guarantee under the
Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990
(subtitle B of title XIII of the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990,
Public Law 101–508, approved Nov. 5,
1990).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 266.10
■
■
[Removed]
5. Remove § 266.10.
6. Revise § 266.30 to read as follows:
§ 266.30
246.
Nonapplicability of 24 CFR part
The regulations at 24 CFR part 246,
pertaining to local rent control, do not
apply to projects that are security for
mortgages insured under this part.
■ 7. In § 266.100:
■ a. Revise the first sentence of
paragraph (a);
■ b. Revise paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6)(i),
and(b)(1);
■ c. Revise the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(2);
■ d. Revise paragraph (b)(3); and
■ e. Add paragraph (b)(4).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 266.100 Qualified housing finance
agency (HFA).
(a) Qualifications. To participate in
the program, an HFA must apply and be
specifically approved for the program
described in this part, in addition to
being approved as a mortgagee under
§ 202.10 of this part. * * *
(1) Carry an issuer credit rating of ‘‘A’’
or better, or an equivalent as evaluated
by Standard and Poor’s or any other
nationally recognized rating agency; or
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12057
(i) The Department of Justice has not
brought a civil rights suit against the
HFA, and no suit is pending;
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Level I approval to originate,
service, and dispose of multifamily
mortgages where the HFA uses its own
underwriting standards, loan terms and
conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures, and assumes 50 to
90 percent of the risk of loss (in 10
percent increments).
(2) Level II approval to originate,
service, and dispose of multifamily
mortgages where the HFA uses
underwriting standards, loan terms and
conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures approved by HUD,
and:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) For HFAs who plan to use Level
I and Level II processing, the
underwriting standards, loan terms and
conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures to be used on
Level II loans must be approved by
HUD.
(4) Every five years, HUD will review
the underwriting standards, loan terms
and conditions, and asset management
and servicing procedures for HFAs with
Level II approval. HUD may require
changes to these procedures as a
condition for continued Level II
approval.
■ 8. Revise § 266.105(b) to read as
follows:
§ 266.105
Application requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Applications for participation in
program. Applications from HFAs for
approval to participate in the program
under this part may be submitted at any
time, and must be submitted in the form
and manner established by HUD.
■ 9. In § 266.110, revise the paragraph
heading and the first sentence of
paragraph (a) and the third sentence of
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 266.110
Reserve requirements.
(a) HFAs with an issuer credit rating
of ‘‘A’’ or better or overall rating of ‘‘A’’
on general obligation bonds. An HFA
with an issuer credit rating of ‘‘A’’ or
better, or an equivalent designation, or
an HFA with an overall rating of ‘‘A’’ on
its general obligation bonds, is not
required to have additional reserves so
long as the HFA maintains that
designation or rating, unless the
Commissioner determines that a
prescribed level of reserves is necessary.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
12058
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(1) * * * The account must be
established prior to the execution of any
risk-sharing agreement under this part
in an initial amount of not less than
$500,000. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
§ 266.115
[Amended]
10. Amend § 266.115 to remove the
words ‘‘his or her’’ from the first
sentence in paragraph (a) and from
paragraph (c).
■ 11. In § 266.120, revise paragraphs (d)
and (e)(5) to read as follows:
■
§ 266.120 Actions for which sanctions may
be imposed.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Actions or conduct for which
sanctions may be imposed against the
HFA by HUD’s Mortgagee Review Board
under 24 CFR 25.9, which pertains to
‘‘notice of administrative action’’.
(e) * * *
(5) Maintain an issuer credit rating of
‘‘A’’ or better, or an equivalent
designation, or overall rating of ‘‘A’’ on
general obligation bonds (or if such
rating is lost, comply with paragraph
(e)(6) of this section);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. In § 266.125, revise paragraph
(a)(6), add paragraph (a)(8), and revise
the first sentence of paragraph (d)(1) to
read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 266.125
Scope and nature of sanctions.
(a) * * *
(6) Recommend to the Commissioner
that the HFA’s mortgagee approval be
withdrawn pursuant to 24 CFR part 25
(regulations of the Mortgagee Review
Board) and/or that penalties be imposed
pursuant to 24 CFR part 30 (regulations
pertaining to Civil Money Penalties;
Certain Prohibited Contact);
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Require the HFA to revise any or
all of its underwriting, processing, asset
management, or servicing policies and
procedures as directed by the
Commissioner.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Any sanction imposed by a
designated office in writing will be
immediately effective, will state the
grounds for the action, and provide for
the HFA’s right to an informal hearing
before the designated office
representative or designee in the
designated office. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. In § 266.200:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (b)(2), (c), (d), (e),
and (g);
■ b. Redesignate paragraph (h) as
paragraph (i); and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
c. Add new paragraph (h).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 266.200
Eligible projects.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Substantial rehabilitation occurs
when the scope of work to improve an
existing project exceeds in aggregate
cost a sum equal to the base per
dwelling unit limit times the applicable
high cost factor established by the
Commissioner, or when the scope of
work involves the replacement of two or
more building systems. Replacement is
when the cost of replacement work
exceeds 50% of the cost of replacing the
entire system. The base per dwelling
unit limit is $15,000 for 2015, and will
be adjusted annually based on the
percentage change in the consumer
price index.
(c) Existing projects. Financing of
existing properties for acquisition or
refinancing without substantial
rehabilitation is allowed.
(1) If the financing will result in the
preservation of affordable housing,
where the property will be maintained
as affordable housing for a period of at
least 20 years, regardless of whether the
loan is prepaid; and
(2) Project occupancy is not less than
93 percent (to include consideration of
rent in arrears), based on the average
occupancy in the project over the most
recent 12 months; and
(3) The loan to be refinanced has not
been in default within the 12 months
prior to the date of the application for
refinancing; and
(4) If applicable, the owner of the
property agrees to renew the Housing
Assistance Payments (HAP) contract for
a 20-year term; and
(5) Existing and post-refinance HAP
residual receipts are set aside to be used
to reduce future HAP payments; and
(6) A capital needs assessment must
be performed and funds escrowed for all
necessary repairs and replacement
reserves funded for future capital
repairs; and
(7) The HUD-insured mortgage does
not exceed an amount supportable by
the lower of the unit rents being
collected under the rental assistance
agreement or the unit rents being
collected at unassisted projects in the
market area that are similar in amenities
and location to the project for which
insurance is being requested, although
this paragraph does not apply to Level
I participants if those projects are
financed under section 202 of the
Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q);
and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(8) For Level II participants only, the
HUD-insured mortgage may not exceed
the sum of the existing indebtedness,
cost of refinancing, or acquisition, the
cost of repairs and reasonable
transaction costs as determined by the
Commissioner. This paragraph does not
apply to Level I participants.
(d) Projects receiving section 8 rental
subsidies or other rental subsidies.
Projects receiving project-based housing
assistance payments under section 8 of
the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C.
1437f) or other rental subsidies and
meeting the requirements of this part
may be insured under this part only if
the mortgage does not exceed an amount
supportable by the lower of the unit
rents being or to be collected under the
rental assistance agreement or the unit
rents being collected at unassisted
projects in the market that are similar in
amenities and location to the project for
which insurance is being requested.
This paragraph does not apply to
projects of Level I participants if those
projects are financed under section 202
of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C.
1701q).
(e) SRO projects. Single room
occupancy (SRO) projects, as defined in
§ 266.5, are eligible for insurance under
this part. Units in SRO projects must be
subject to 30-calendar day or longer
leases; however, rent payments may be
made on a weekly basis in SRO projects.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Elderly projects. Projects or parts
of projects specifically designed for the
use and occupancy by elderly families.
An elderly family means any household
where the head or spouse is 62 years of
age or older, including children under
18, and also any single person who is 62
years of age or older.
(h) Housing for older persons. Projects
eligible for and in compliance with 42
U.S.C. 3607(b) and 24 CFR part 100,
subpart E.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 266.205
[Amended]
14. Amend § 266.205 by adding the
word ‘‘calendar’’ after the number ‘‘30’’
in paragraph (a)(1) and adding the
letters ‘‘U.S.’’ before the term
‘‘Department of Defense’’ in paragraph
(b)(2).
■ 15. In § 266.210:
■ a. Remove paragraph (b);
■ b. Redesignate paragraphs (c), (d) and
(e) as paragraphs (b), (c) and (d),
respectively; and
■ c. Revise newly redesignated
paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 266.210
*
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
*
HUD-retained review functions.
*
08MRP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(c) Subsidy layering. The
Commissioner, or Housing Credit
Agencies as defined by section 42 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26
U.S.C. 42), through such delegation as
may be in effect by regulation hereafter,
shall review all projects receiving tax
credits and some form of HUD
assistance for any excess subsidy
provided to individual projects and
reduce subsidy sources in accordance
with outstanding guidelines.
(d) Davis-Bacon Act. The
Commissioner shall obtain and provide
to the HFA the appropriate U.S.
Department of Labor wage rate
determinations under the Davis-Bacon
Act, where they apply under this part.
■ 16. Revise § 266.215(e) to read as
follows:
§ 266.215
HFAs.
Functions delegated by HUD to
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Lead-based paint. The HFA will
perform functions related to Lead-based
paint requirements as set forth in 24
CFR part 35, subparts A, B, G, and R.
■ 17. Add § 266.217 to read as follows:
§ 266.217 Environmental review
requirements.
The responsible entity, as defined in
24 CFR part 58 (Environmental Review
Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD
Environmental Responsibilities),
assumes legal responsibility for
compliance with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and related laws and authorities.
The responsible entity will visit each
project site proposed for insurance
under this part and prepare the
applicable environmental reviews as set
forth in 24 CFR part 58. HUD may make
a finding in accordance with 24 CFR
58.11 and may perform the
environmental review itself under 24
CFR part 50 (Protection and
Enhancement of Environmental
Quality). In all cases the environmental
review must be completed before HUD
may issue the firm approval letter.
■ 18. Revise § 266.220 to read as
follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 266.220 Nondiscrimination in housing
and employment.
The mortgagor must certify to the
HFA that, so long as the mortgage is
insured under this part, the mortgagor
will:
(a) Not use tenant selection
procedures that discriminate against
families with children, except in the
case of a project qualifying for and
complying with the requirements of the
‘‘housing for older persons’’ exemption,
as defined in section 807(b)(2) of the
Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3607(b))
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
and further described in 24 CFR part
100, subpart E. Projects receiving
Federal financial assistance in which
elderly families include minor children
may not avail themselves of the housing
for older persons exemption;
(b) Determine eligibility for admission
and continued occupancy without
regard to actual or perceived sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital
status and refrain from inquiries about
sexual orientation and gender identity
in accordance with 24 CFR 5.105(a)(2);
(c)(1) Comply with:
(i) The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C.
3601 through 3619), as implemented by
24 CFR part 100;
(ii) Titles II and III of the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.
12101 through 12213), as implemented
by 28 CFR part 35;
(iii) Section 3 of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968 (12
U.S.C. 1701u), as implemented by 24
CFR part 135;
(iv) The Equal Credit Opportunity Act
(15 U.S C. 1691–1691f), as implemented
by 12 CFR part 202;
(v) Executive Order 11063, as
amended by Executive Order 12259 (3
CFR 1958–1963 Comp., p. 652 and 3
CFR 1980 Comp., p. 307), and
implemented by 24 CFR part 107;
(vi) Executive Order 11246 (3 CFR
1964–1965 Comp., p. 339), as
implemented by 41 CFR part 60; and
(vii) Other applicable Federal laws
and regulations issued pursuant to these
authorities; and applicable State and
local fair housing and equal opportunity
laws.
(2) In addition to the authorities listed
in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a
mortgagor that receives Federal
financial assistance must also certify to
the HFA that, so long as the mortgage
is insured under this part, it will
comply with:
(i) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), as implemented
by 24 CFR part 1;
(ii) The Age Discrimination Act of
1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 through 6107), as
implemented by 24 CFR part 146; and
(iii) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as
implemented by 24 CFR part 8.
■ 19. In § 266.225, revise the
introductory text of paragraph (a)(1),
and revise paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (b), (c),
(d)(1), and the second sentence of
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 266.225
Labor standards.
(a) * * *
(1) All laborers and mechanics
employed by contractors or
subcontractors on a project insured
under this part shall be paid not less
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12059
than the wages prevailing in the locality
in which the work was performed for
the corresponding classes of laborers
and mechanics employed in
construction of a similar character, as
determined by the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Labor (Secretary of
Labor) in accordance with the DavisBacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141
et seq.), where the project meets all of
the following conditions:
(i) Advances for construction of the
project are insured under this part;
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Volunteers. The provisions of this
section shall not apply to volunteers
under the conditions set out in 24 CFR
part 70 (Use of Volunteers on Projects
Subject to Davis-Bacon and HUDDetermined Wage Rates). In applying 24
CFR part 70, insurance under this part
shall be treated as a program for which
there is a statutory exemption for
volunteers.
(c) Labor standards. Any contract,
subcontract, or building loan agreement
executed for a project subject to DavisBacon wage rates under paragraph (a) of
this section shall comply with all labor
standards and provisions of the U.S.
Department of Labor regulations in 29
CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 that would be
applicable to a mortgage insurance
program to which Davis-Bacon wage
rates are made applicable by statute,
provided, that regulatory provisions
relating to investigations and
enforcement by the U.S. Department of
Labor shall not be applicable, and
enforcement of Davis-Bacon labor
standards shall be the responsibility of
the Commissioner in accordance with
paragraph (e) of this section.
(d) * * *
(1) No advance under a mortgage on
a project subject to Davis-Bacon wage
rates under paragraph (a) of this section
shall be eligible for insurance under this
part unless the HFA determines (in
accordance with the Commissioner’s
administrative procedures) that the
general contractor or any subcontractor
or any firm, corporation, partnership or
association in which the contractor or
subcontractor has a substantial interest
was not, on the date the contract or
subcontract was executed, on the
ineligible list established by the
Comptroller General of the United
States, pursuant 29 CFR 5.12, issued by
the Secretary of Labor.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * Where routine
administration and enforcement
functions are delegated to the HFA, the
HFA shall bear financial responsibility
for any deficiency in payment of
prevailing wages or, where applicable
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
12060
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
under 29 CFR part 1 (Procedures for
Predetermination of Wage Rates), any
increase in compensation to a
contractor, that is attributable to any
failure properly to carry out its
delegated functions. * * *
■ 20. In § 266.300:
■ a. Revise paragraph (b)(1);
■ b. Redesignate existing paragraphs
(b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) as paragraphs
(b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6), respectively;
■ c. Add new paragraph (b)(3);
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(5); and
■ e. Revise paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 266.300 HFAs accepting 50 percent or
more of risk.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Determine that a market for the
project exists, taking into consideration
any comments from the local HUD
office relative to the potential adverse
impact the project will have on existing
or proposed Federally insured and
assisted projects in the area.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Arrange for the performance of an
environmental review in accordance
with § 266.217;
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Approve the Affirmative Fair
Housing Marketing Plan, required by
§ 266.215(a); and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) HUD-retained reviews. After
positive completion of the HUDretained reviews specified in
§ 266.210(a) and (b) the local HUD office
will issue a firm approval letter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. In § 266.305:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (a) and (b)(1);
■ b. Redesignate existing paragraphs
(b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) as paragraphs
(b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6), respectively;
■ c. Add new paragraph (b)(3);
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(5), and
■ e. Revise paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 266.305 HFAs accepting less than 50
percent of risk.
(a) Underwriting standards. The
underwriting standards and loan terms
and conditions of any HFA electing to
take less than 50 percent of the risk on
certain projects are subject to review,
modification, and approval by HUD in
accordance with § 266.100(b). These
HFAs may assume 25 percent or 10
percent of the risk depending upon the
loan-to-replacement-cost or loan-to-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
value ratios of the projects to be insured
as specified in § 266.100(b)(2)(i) and (ii).
Large loans, as defined by HUD for its
insured multifamily mortgage programs,
require prior approval by the
Commissioner.
(b) * * *
(1) Determine that a market for the
project exists, taking into consideration
any comments from the local HUD
office relative to the potential adverse
impact the project will have on existing
or proposed Federally insured and
assisted projects in the area;
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Arrange for the performance of an
environmental review in accordance
with § 266.217;
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Approve the Affirmative Fair
Housing Marketing Plan, required by
§ 266.215(a); and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) HUD-retained reviews. After
positive completion of the HUDretained reviews specified in
§ 266.210(a) and (b), the local HUD
office will issue a firm approval letter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. In § 266.410, revise paragraph (e)
to read as follows:
§ 266.410
Mortgage provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Amortization. The mortgage must
provide for complete amortization (i.e.,
be regularly amortizing) over the term of
the mortgage. The complete
amortization requirement does not
apply to:
(1) Construction loans, or
(2) Level I participants where the loan
has a minimum term of 17 years and the
HFA’s underwriting standards, loan
terms and conditions, and asset
management and servicing procedures
have been approved by HUD.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. In § 266.420, revise the second
sentence of paragraph (a) and
paragraphs (b)(3), (4), and (7), and add
paragraph (b)(13) to read as follows:
§ 266.420 Closing and endorsement by the
Commissioner.
(a) * * * The note must provide that
the mortgage is insured under section
542(c) of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1992 and the
regulations set forth in this part that are
in effect on the date of endorsement.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Certification that the loan has been
processed, prudently underwritten
(including a determination that a market
exists for the project), cost certified (if
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the project is being submitted for final
endorsement) and closed in full
compliance with the HFA’s standards
and requirements (or where the
mortgage is insured under Level II, in
full compliance with the underwriting
standards, loan terms and conditions,
and asset management and servicing
procedures, as approved by HUD).
(4) At the time of final endorsement,
for periodic advances cases, a
certification that the advances were
made in accordance with the mortgage
pursuant to § 266.310.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) A certification that the HFA has
reviewed and approved the Affirmative
Fair Housing Marketing Plan, required
by § 266.215(a), and found it acceptable.
*
*
*
*
*
(13) Certification that housing
claiming the housing for older persons
exemption is eligible for and complies
with 42 U.S.C. 3607(b) and 24 CFR part
100, subpart E.
■ 24. Revise § 266.500 to read as
follows:
§ 266.500
General.
(a) HFA responsibility for monitoring
project owners. The HFA will have full
responsibility for managing and
servicing projects insured under this
part (in accordance with procedures
disclosed and submitted with its
application and the requirements of this
part). The HFA is responsible for
monitoring and determining the
compliance of the project owner in
accordance with the provisions of this
subpart. HUD will monitor the
performance of the HFA, not the project
owner, to determine its compliance with
the provisions covered under this
subpart.
(b) HUD review of procedures for
HFAs with Level II approval. Asset
management and servicing procedures
of any HFA electing to take less than 50
percent of the risk on certain projects
are subject to review, modification, and
approval by HUD in accordance with
§ 266.100(b).
§ 266.505
[Amended]
25. Amend § 266.505:
a. In paragraph (b)(8), after the word
‘‘Plan’’ by adding the phrase ‘‘, required
by § 266.215(a),’’;
■ b. In paragraph (b)(10), by removing
the words ‘‘General Accounting’’ and
adding in their place ‘‘U.S. Government
Accountability’’.
■ 26. Revise § 266.507 to read as
follows:
■
■
§ 266.507
Maintenance requirements.
The mortgagor must maintain the
project in accordance with the physical
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
condition standards in 24 CFR part 5,
subpart G (Physical Condition
Standards and Inspection
Requirements).
■ 27. Revise § 266.510(a) to read as
follows:
§ 266.510
HFA responsibilities.
(a) Inspections. The HFA must
perform inspections in accordance with
the physical inspection procedures in
24 CFR part 5, subpart G (Physical
Condition Standards and Inspection
Requirements).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 28. Revise § 266.600 to read as
follows:
§ 266.600 Mortgage insurance premium:
insurance upon completion.
(a) Initial premium. For projects
insured upon completion, on the date of
the final closing, the HFA shall pay to
the Commissioner an initial premium in
an amount established by the
Commissioner under § 266.604.
(b) Premium payable with first
payment of principal. On the date of the
first payment of principal the HFA shall
pay a second premium (calculated on a
per annum basis) in an amount
established by the Commissioner under
§ 266.604.
(c) Subsequent premiums. Until one
of the conditions is met under
§ 266.606(a), the HFA on each
anniversary of the date of the first
principal payment shall pay to the
Commissioner an annual mortgage
insurance premium in an amount
established by the Commissioner under
§ 266.604, without taking into account
delinquent payments, or partial claim
payment under § 266.630, or
prepayments, for the year following the
date on which the premium becomes
payable.
■ 29. In § 266.602, revise paragraph (a),
the first sentence of paragraph (b), the
first sentence of paragraph (c), and
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 266.602 Mortgage insurance premium:
Insured advances.
(a) Initial premium. For projects
involving insured advances, on the date
of the initial closing, the HFA shall pay
to the Commissioner an initial premium
equal to an amount established by the
Commissioner under § 266.604.
(b) Interim premium. On each
anniversary of the initial closing, the
HFA shall pay an interim mortgage
insurance premium in an amount
established by the Commissioner under
§ 266.604. * * *
(c) Premium payable with first
payment of principal. On the date of the
first principal payment, the HFA shall
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
pay a mortgage insurance premium in
an amount established by the
Commissioner under § 266.604. * * *
(d) Subsequent premiums. Until one
of the conditions is met under
§ 266.606(a), the HFA on each
anniversary of the date of the first
principal payment shall pay to the
Commissioner an annual mortgage
insurance premium in an amount
established by the Commissioner under
§ 266.604, without taking into account
delinquent payments, prepayments, or a
partial claim payment under § 266.630,
for the year following the date on which
the premium becomes payable.
■ 30. In § 266.604, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b), the first sentence of paragraph
(c), and the second and third sentences
of paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 266.604 Mortgage insurance premium:
Other requirements.
(a) Premium calculations on or after
first principal payment. The premiums
payable to the Commissioner on and
after the first principal payment shall be
calculated in accordance with the
amortization schedule prepared by the
HFA for final closing and an amount
established by the Commissioner
through a notice published in the
Federal Register and providing a 30-day
comment period. After the comments
have been considered, HUD will publish
a final notice announcing the premium
and its effective date. The premium
shall not take into account delinquent
payments or prepayments.
(b) Future premium changes. Notice
of future premium changes will be
published in the Federal Register. The
Commissioner will propose mortgage
insurance premium changes for the
Risk-Sharing Program and provide a 30calendar day public comment period for
the purpose of accepting comments on
whether the proposed changes are
appropriate. After the comments have
been considered, HUD will publish a
final notice announcing the premium
and its effective date.
(c) Closing information. The HFA
shall provide final closing information
to the Commissioner within 15 calendar
days of the final closing in a format
prescribed by the Commissioner. * * *
(d) Due date for premium payments.
* * * Any premium received by the
Commissioner more than 15 calendar
days after the due date shall be assessed
a late charge of 4 percent of the amount
of the premium payment due. Mortgage
insurance premiums that are paid to the
Commissioner more than 30 calendar
days after the due date shall begin to
accrue interest at the rate prescribed by
the Treasury Fiscal Requirements
Manual.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12061
31. In § 266.620:
a. Revise the section heading;
b. Redesignate the undesignated
introductory paragraph as paragraph (a)
and redesignate existing paragraphs (a)
through (g), as paragraphs (a)(1) through
(7), respectively; and
■ c. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 266.620 Termination of contract of
insurance and indemnification.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) In lieu of termination of the
mortgage insurance contract pursuant to
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the
Commissioner may, in his or her full
discretion, permit a Level I participant
rated ‘‘A’’ or higher to indemnify HUD,
or otherwise reimburse HUD in a
manner acceptable to the Commissioner,
for the full amount of the mortgage
claim.
■ 32. In § 266.626, revise the first
sentence of paragraph (c) and revise
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 266.626 Notice and date of termination
by the Commissioner.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Notice of default. If a default (as
defined in paragraph (a) of this section)
continues for a period of 30 calendar
days, the HFA must notify the
Commissioner within 10 calendar days
thereafter, unless the default is cured
within the 30-day period. * * *
(d) Timing of claim filing. Unless a
written extension is granted by HUD,
the HFA must file an application for
initial claim payment (or, if appropriate,
for partial claim payment) within 75
calendar days from the date of default
and may do so as early as the first day
of the month following the month for
which a payment was missed. Upon
request of the HFA, HUD may extend,
up to 180 calendar days from the date
of default, the deadline for filing a
claim. In those cases where the HFA
certifies that the project owner is in the
process of transacting a bond refunder,
refinancing the mortgage, or changing
the ownership for the purpose of curing
the default and bringing the mortgage
current, HUD may extend the deadline
for filing a claim beyond 180 calendar
days, not to exceed 360 calendar days
from the date of default.
■ 33. Revise § 266.628(a)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 266.628
Initial claim payments.
(a) * * *
(3) The HFA must use the proceeds of
the initial claim payment to retire any
bonds or any other financing
mechanisms securing the mortgage
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
12062
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
within 30 calendar days of the initial
claim payment. Any excess funds
resulting from such retirement or
repayment shall be returned to HUD
within 30 calendar days of the
retirement.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 34. In § 266.630, revise the second
sentence of paragraph (c)(2), paragraphs
(d)(1), (2), and (4), and the second
sentence of paragraph (d)(5) to read as
follows:
§ 266.630
Partial payment of claims.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * * The HFA is granted an
extension of 30 calendar days from the
date of any notification for further
action.
(d) Requirements—(1) One partial
claim payment. Only one partial claim
payment may be made under a contract
of insurance.
(2) Partial claim payment amount.
The amount of the partial claim
payment is limited to 50% of the
amount of relief provided by the HFA in
the form of a reduction in principal and
a reduction of delinquent interest due
on the insured mortgage times the lesser
of HUD’s percentage of the risk of loss
or 50 percent.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Partial claim repayment by HFA.
The HFA must remit to HUD a
percentage of all amounts collected on
the HFA’s second mortgage within 15
calendar days of receipt by the HFA.
The applicable percentage is equal to
the percentage used in paragraph (d)(2)
of this section to determine the partial
claim payment amount. Payments made
after the 15th day must include a 5
percent late charge plus accrued interest
at the Debenture rate.
(5) * * * The HFA must submit a
final certified statement within 30
calendar days after the second mortgage
is paid in full, foreclosed, or otherwise
terminated.
[Amended]
35. Amend § 266.634(c) by adding the
word ‘‘calendar’’ immediately before the
word ‘‘days’’ in the first sentence.
■
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 266.638
[Amended]
36. Amend § 266.638 to:
a. Add the word ‘‘calendar’’
immediately before the word ‘‘days’’ in
the first sentence of paragraph (a);
■ b. Remove the word ‘‘five’’ from the
second sentence of paragraph (b), and
add in its place the number ‘‘5’’;
■ c. Remove the words ‘‘five year’’ from
the third sentence of paragraph (b) and
add in their place ‘‘5-year’’.
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:21 Mar 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
[Amended]
§ 266.644
[Amended]
38. Amend § 266.644 to add the word
‘‘calendar’’ before the word ‘‘days’’ in
the undesignated introductory
paragraph
■
§ 266.648
[Amended]
39. Amend § 266.648(c)(4) to remove
the words ‘‘the Office of General
Counsel’’ and add in their place ‘‘HUD’’.
■ 40. In § 266.650, revise paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
§ 266.650
Items deducted from total loss.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) All amounts received by the HFA
on account of the mortgage after the date
of default, including any partial
payment of claim paid by HUD in the
event a full claim follows a partial
payment of claim;
*
*
*
*
*
§ 266.654
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
document, Report No. 3038, released
February 11, 2016. The full text of
Report No. 3038 is available for viewing
and copying in Room CY–B402, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC. The
Commission will not send a copy of this
document pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A),
because this document does not have an
impact on any rules of particular
applicability.
Subject: In the Matter of Rules for
Interstate Inmate Calling Services, WC
Docket No. 12–375, published at 80 FR
79136, December 18, 2015. This notice
is published pursuant to § 1.429 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.429. See
also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1).
Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
37. Amend the third sentence of
§ 266.642 to remove the phrase ‘‘45day’’ and in its place add the phrase
‘‘45-calendar day’’.
■
■
*
§ 266.634
§ 266.642
[Amended]
41. Amend § 266.654(b) to add the
word ‘‘calendar’’ before the word
‘‘days’’ in the first sentence.
■
Dated: February 25, 2016.
Edward Golding,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Housing.
[FR Doc. 2016–04595 Filed 3–7–16; 8:45 am]
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–05014 Filed 3–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 350, 365, 385, 386, 387,
and 395
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0001]
RIN 2126–AB11
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
Carrier Safety Fitness Determination
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[WC Docket No. 12–375; Report 3038]
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
period and technical correction.
AGENCY:
FMCSA extends the public
comment period for the Agency’s notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that
published on January 21, 2016. This
AGENCY: Federal Communications
NPRM concerns the proposals to the
Commission.
current methodology for issuance of
ACTION: Petition for reconsideration.
safety fitness determinations (SFD) for
motor carriers. The Agency extends the
SUMMARY: A Petition for Reconsideration
deadline for the submission of initial
(Petition) has been filed in the
comments to May 23, 2016. Reply
Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding
comments will be due on or before June
by Michael S. Hamden, on behalf of
23, 2016. In addition, FMCSA corrects
himself.
the title and date of an American
DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must
Transportation Research Institute
be filed on or before March 23, 2016.
(ATRI) study report that the NPRM cited
Replies to an opposition must be filed
about the Agency’s Safety Measurement
on or before April 4, 2016.
System (SMS).
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
DATES: FMCSA is extending the initial
Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
comment period for the proposed
Washington DC 20554.
rulemaking published on January 21,
2016 (81 FR 3562). You must submit
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil
comments by May 23, 2016, and reply
Strobel, Wireline Competition Bureau,
comments on or before June 23, 2016.
202–418–7084, Gil.Strobel@fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
Petition for Reconsideration of Action
in a Rulemaking Proceeding
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12051-12062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04595]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 266
[Docket No FR-5881-P-01]
RIN 2502-AJ35
Section 542(c) Housing Finance Agencies Risk-Sharing Program:
Revisions to Regulations
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Through the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program, HUD
enters into risk-sharing agreements with State and local housing
finance agencies (HFAs) so that HFAs can provide more insurance and
credit for multifamily loans. This proposed rule would amend existing
regulations for the program so that they better align with policies for
other HUD programs, reflect current industry and HUD practices, and
conform to statutory amendments. Additionally, this proposed rule would
provide HUD with greater flexibility in operating the Section 542(c)
HFA Risk-Sharing program 0s,over time, and would provide more
flexibility for certain HFAs accepting a greater share of the risk of
loss on mortgages insured under the program. This proposed rule would
also update references and terminology that are now outdated and
clarify certain provisions.
DATES: Comment Due Date: April 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this notice to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Communications must refer to the
above docket number and title. There are two methods for submitting
public comments. All submissions must refer to the above docket number
and title.
[[Page 12052]]
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again,
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of this
document.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at
the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, an appointment to review the public comments must be
scheduled in advance by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-
3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the
Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Talios, Office of Multifamily
Production, Office of Housing, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 6156, Washington, DC 20410;
telephone number (202) 402-7125 (this is not a toll-free number).
Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 542 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992
(12 U.S.C. 1707 1715z-22) (Section 542) directs HUD to carry out
programs through the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to
demonstrate the effectiveness of providing new forms of Federal credit
enhancement for multifamily loans. Originally enacted as a pilot
program, the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program was made a
permanent multifamily insurance program by section 235 of title II of
Public Law 106-377,\1\ HUD's Fiscal Year 2001 appropriations act (FY
2001 HUD Appropriations Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Approved October 27, 2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program is to
provide credit enhancement for mortgages of multifamily housing
projects whose loans are underwritten, processed, serviced, and
disposed of by HFAs. HUD and HFAs share in the risk of the mortgage,
which enables HFAs to provide more insurance and credit for multifamily
loans. Under the program, qualified State and local HFAs may originate
and underwrite affordable housing loans including new construction,
substantial rehabilitation, refinancing, and housing for the elderly.
HFAs may elect to share from 10 to 90 percent of the loss on a loan
with HUD. In the event of a claim, the HFA reimburses HUD pursuant to
terms of the risk-sharing agreement.
HUD's regulations governing the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing
program are set out in 24 CFR part 266. Part 266 was last updated in
the year 2000 and is now outdated in certain respects.
II. This Proposed Rule
HUD proposes to revise 24 CFR part 266 in order to update the
regulations, to better align them with current HUD policies and
industry practices, and to provide HUD and certain HFAs with
flexibility to operate the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program more
efficiently.
A. Conforming Amendments
This proposed rule would revise sections of part 266 to conform to
Section 542(c), as it was amended by the FY 2001 HUD Appropriations
Act. Specifically, this proposed rule would amend part 266 to remove
references to the program being a pilot.
Additionally, this proposed rule would amend the definition of
affordable housing in Sec. 266.5 so that it more closely conforms to
the statutory language of Section 542. Specifically, this proposed rule
would amend the definition of ``affordable housing'' for the Section
542 HFA Risk-Sharing program to mean a project that meets the
requirements for a qualified low-income housing project under section
42(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. title 26) (IRC).
Currently, Sec. 266.5 specifies that affordable housing means a
project in which 20 percent or more of the units are both rent-
restricted and occupied by families whose income is 50 percent or less
of the area median income as determined by HUD, with adjustments for
household size, or in which 40 percent \2\ or more of the units are
both rent-restricted and occupied by families whose income is 60
percent or less of the area median income as determined by HUD, with
adjustments for household size. The existing definition also says that
a residential unit is rent-restricted if the gross rent with respect to
such unit does not exceed 30 percent of the imputed income limitation
applicable to such unit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Twenty five percent in New York City as a result of section
142(d)(6) of the IRC establishing a special rule for projects
located in a specified high cost housing area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulatory language unnecessarily repeats what is already
provided in statute. Section 542(c)(7) states that housing securing
loans insured under the section qualifies as affordable only if the
housing is occupied by very low-income families and bears rents not
greater than the gross rent for rent-restricted residential units as
determined under section 42(g)(2) of the IRC. Section 42(g) of the IRC
provides qualifications for low-income housing projects to be eligible
for a low-income housing tax credit. While the definition in Section
542 cross references only to IRC subsection 42(g)(2), the rent limits
established in subsection (g)(2) can be understood only through a
reading of IRC subsection (g) in its entirety as a result of internal
cross references in the IRC statutory language. Because ``gross rent''
and ``supportive service'' are both defined in section 42(g) of the
IRC, this proposed rule would remove the definitions of these two terms
from Sec. 266.5, but would include in the definition of ``affordable
housing'' the provision currently in the ``gross rent'' definition that
a utility allowance includes charges for the occupancy of a cooperative
unit. The proposed regulatory change will remove unnecessary regulatory
verbiage and simplify the part 266 regulations.
Further, Sec. 266.210(b) of the existing regulations is outdated
in that it provides that compliance with the
[[Page 12053]]
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
(NEPA) is the responsibility of the HUD Field Office or other
responsible entity. However, Section 542(c)(9) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992, as amended by the Multifamily
Housing Property Disposition Reform Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-233),
provides that HUD may provide for assumption of its environmental
review requirements. This proposed regulation thus moves the paragraph
on NEPA compliance requirements from Sec. 266.210, HUD-retained review
functions, to a new section, Sec. 266.217, titled ``Environmental
review requirements.'' This proposed rule would also change the
phrasing of the existing environmental review requirements to make it
clear that Responsible Entities assume legal responsibility for
environmental compliance, but HUD may make a finding in accordance with
24 CFR 58.11 (Legal capacity and performance) and may perform the
environmental review itself under 24 CFR part 50 (Protection and
enhancement of environmental quality). Relatedly, this proposed rule
would revise Sec. 266.300(b) and Sec. 266.305(b), which describe HFA
responsibilities, to reflect that the HFA has a responsibility to
arrange for the environmental review.
This proposed rule would also amend certain sections of the
regulations to conform to other HUD regulations. The proposed rule
would revise Sec. 266.215(e) to reflect that HFAs must follow Lead-
Based Paint requirements in 24 CFR part 35, and it would also update
Sec. 266.220(b) to reflect HUD's equal access rule, which requires
that HUD-assisted and HUD-insured housing be made available without
regard to actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or
marital status (See 77 FR 5662, February 3, 2012). Currently, Sec.
266.220(b) states that the mortgagor must certify that it will not
discriminate against any family because of the sex of the head of
household. This proposed rule would update the section to state that
the mortgagor must certify that it will provide housing without regard
to sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status, and will
refrain from making improper inquiries, in accordance with 24 CFR
5.105(a)(2).
B. Updating Terminology
This proposed rule would update part 266 to eliminate references to
outdated terminology. Specifically, Sec. Sec. 266.100(a)(1),
266.110(a), and 266.120(d)(5) refer to HFAs that have or maintain a top
tier designation. However, rating agencies no longer offer top tier
ratings. Rather, current rating agency practice is to provide an issuer
credit rating that evaluates the agency's capacity and willingness to
meet its financial commitments. The proposed rule would replace
requirements for HFAs to have top tier designation with requirements
that they have an issuer rating of ``A'' or better. Additionally, Sec.
266.505(b)(10) refers to the General Accounting Office, and this
proposed rule would change this to reflect the current name of the
agency: The Government Accountability Office.
C. Revisions To Provide Greater Flexibility
HUD proposes changing certain requirements to provide both HUD and
HFAs that assume a larger share of the risk with greater flexibility in
operating the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program.
Under Sec. 266.100(b), HFAs with Level II approval, that is, HFAs
that assume less than 50% of the risk of loss on mortgages insured
under the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program, must use
underwriting standards and loan terms and conditions approved by HUD.
However, the regulations do not provide that HUD can revisit the
approval if market conditions or risk standards change. Many of the
standards used by HFAs with Level II approval have been in place for
more than 20 years. This proposed rule would amend Sec. 266.100(b) to
provide that, every five years, HUD will recertify the underwriting
standards, loan terms and conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures for HFAs with Level II approval, and may require
changes to these procedures as a condition for continued approval.
HUD's review would periodically benchmark Level II HFA underwriting
standards against current FHA standards that are analogous to the
appropriate FHA program. Additionally, Sec. 266.305(a), which
describes underwriting standards for HFAs accepting less than 50% of
the risk, would refer to the revised Sec. 266.100(b).
Similarly, this proposed rule would amend Sec. 266.125(a), which
describes actions that HUD may take against HFAs that do not comply
with Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program requirements, to provide
that one of the actions that HUD may take is to require the HFA to
revise any or all of its underwriting, processing, or asset management
policies as directed by the FHA Commissioner.
This proposed rule would provide HFAs that assume at least 50% of
the risk of loss on mortgages insured under the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program more flexibility in financing existing properties
without substantial rehabilitation to preserve affordability by
amending Sec. 266.200(c). Currently, Sec. 266.200(c) provides that
HFAs may finance existing properties without substantial rehabilitation
if the financing will result in the preservation of affordable housing,
project occupancy is not less than 93 percent, the mortgage does not
exceed an amount supportable by the lower of the units rents being
collected under the rental assistance agreement or at similar
unassisted projects in the market area, and the HUD-insured mortgage
does not exceed the sum of the existing indebtedness, cost of
refinancing, cost of repairs, and reasonable transaction costs.
Additionally, HFAs that assume less than 50 percent of the risk may not
refinance loans that had been in default within the 12 months prior to
the application for refinancing. The proposed rule maintains these
requirements, but eliminates the requirement that the HUD-insured
mortgage may not exceed the sum of the existing indebtedness, cost of
refinancing, cost of repairs, and reasonable transaction costs for HFAs
that assume 50 percent or more of the risk. Permitting equity take-outs
under certain conditions for refinance and acquisition transactions is
a key preservation tool to ensure long-term affordability. This
provision is also consistent with similar FHA programs, and industry
practice.
In order to mitigate risk to FHA, ensure affordability of projects,
and consistent with FHA's experience, this proposed rule would add
additional requirements that all HFAs would have to meet in order to
finance existing properties: Loans to be refinanced cannot have been in
default in the 12 months prior to the date of application for
refinancing, the owner must agree to renew the housing assistance
payments (HAP) contract for a 20-year term, if applicable, existing and
post-refinance HAP residual receipts must be set aside to be used to
reduce future HAP payments, the property must be maintained as
affordable housing for a period of at least 20 years, regardless of
whether the loan is prepaid, and a capital needs assessment must be
performed and funds escrowed for all necessary repairs and replacement
reserves funded for future capital repairs.
Additionally, this proposed rule would provide HFAs that assume at
least 50% of the risk of loss on Section 542(c) mortgages more
flexibility by providing that certain loans need not be regularly
amortizing. Section 266.410(e)
[[Page 12054]]
would be revised so that loans of HFAs that assume at least 50% of the
risk would not need to be regularly amortizing if they have a minimum
term of 17 years and HUD has approved the HFA's underwriting standards,
loan terms and conditions, and asset management and servicing
procedures. Non-fully amortizing (also known as ``balloon'') loans are
not unusual multifamily lending options. The change will align the
542(c) program with conventional industry practices, particularly for
Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) transactions. Moreover, balloon
loans with similar terms are typical in HUD's section 542(b) Risk Share
program, under which HUD enters into reinsurance agreements with Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Finance Board, and other
Qualified Financial Institutions (QFIs).
Further, this proposed rule would revise Sec. 266.620, which
explains circumstances under which the contract of insurance would
terminate. This proposed rule adds flexibility by providing that, in
cases where an HFA or its successors commits fraud or makes a material
misrepresentation, HUD may permit HFAs that assume more than 50% of the
risk and have an issuer rating of ``A'' or better to indemnify HUD, or
otherwise reimburse HUD in a manner acceptable to the Commissioner, for
the full amount of the mortgage claim in lieu of the mortgage insurance
contract being terminated. This change would provide flexibility for
HFAs that assume more than 50% of the risk to participate in certain
financing initiatives offered by HUD under the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-
Sharing program, while protecting the FHA General and Special Risk
Insurance Fund against losses.
D. Revisions To Reflect Current Program Practices
In addition to amending Sec. 266.410(e) to provide more
flexibility for certain HFAs, this proposed rule would clarify that the
existing requirement that the mortgage must be fully amortizing does
not apply to construction loans. Construction loans have typically been
non-amortizing, interest-only loans since the inception of the program,
and this is typical industry practice.
This proposed rule would also better reflect current program
practices by removing Sec. 266.10, entitled ``Allocations of
assistance and credit subsidy.'' Section 266.10 currently provides that
HUD will announce the availability of assistance under the Section
542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program and invite qualified HFAs to submit an
application. It also provides that credit subsidies will be obligated
and allocated in accordance with outstanding HUD instructions. This
section was relevant when the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program
was a pilot program with specific unit counts reserved for each
participating HFA. Unit allocations and reservations of credit subsidy
are no longer required because the program is a permanent insurance
program.
Relatedly, this proposed rule would amend Sec. 266.105(b), which
says that applications from HFAs for approval to participate in the
Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program will be submitted in response
to a notice published in the Federal Register. In accordance with
current practice, which reflects that the Section 542(c) HFA Risk-
Sharing program is now permanent, this section would now state that
applications may be submitted at any time, in the form and manner
established by HUD.
This proposed rule would clarify that in certain circumstances,
Housing for Older Persons projects, as described in 24 CFR part 100
subpart E, qualify as eligible projects under Sec. 266.200. Housing
providers should be aware that projects must comply with all program
rules and the housing for older persons exemption to the Fair Housing
Act (42 U.S.C. 3607(b); 24 CFR part 100 subpart E) in order to exclude
families with children under 18. A housing facility insured under the
Section 542 program may not invoke the housing for older persons
exemption to exclude children if it also receives Federal financial
assistance pursuant to a statute or program in which eligible families
include children under the age of 18. For example, owners of projects
that receive rental assistance under any of the Section 8 rental
assistance programs are bound by the definition of ``families'' and
``elderly families'' in section 3(b)(3)(B) of the United States Housing
Act of 1937 and in implementing regulations. Because these definitions
explicitly include families with children, such projects are not
eligible for the exemption. The housing for older persons exemption
allows a housing community to exclude children under 18 years without
violating the Fair Housing Act's prohibition against familial status
discrimination. The Fair Housing Act prohibits, inter alia, familial
status discrimination, which means one or more individuals who have not
attained the age of 18 years being domiciled with (1) a parent or
another person having legal custody of such individual or individuals
or (2) the designee of such parent or other person having such custody,
with the written permission of such parent or other person. The
protections against familial status discrimination apply also to
persons who are pregnant or who are in the process of securing legal
custody of any individual who is not yet 18 years old. See 42 U.S.C.
3602(k).
The housing for older persons exemption may be invoked if the
housing is either provided under a State or Federal program that the
Secretary of HUD determines is specifically designed and operated to
assist elderly persons, or, intended for and solely occupied by,
persons who are 62 years old or older, or, intended and operated for
persons who are 55 years of age or older where at least 80 percent of
the occupied units are occupied by at least one person who is at least
55 years old, the housing facility publishes and adheres to policies
and procedures that demonstrate the intent to serve persons 55 years
old and older, and, the housing facility complies with HUD's rules for
verification of occupancy. See 42 U.S.C. 3607(b) and 24 CFR 100.300
through 100.307.
In order to qualify for the housing for older persons exemption,
State or Federal programs must be determined by the Secretary to be
``specifically designed and operated to assist elderly persons (as
defined in the State or Federal program).'' See 42 U.S.C.
3607(b)(2)(A); 24 CFR 100.302. HUD, however, has never designated one
of its own programs as housing for older persons under this exemption.
Relatedly, the rulemaking proposes to add a clause to the
description of elderly projects, at Sec. 266.200, specifying that an
elderly family includes families with minor children. This is to
distinguish such projects from those that qualify for and claim an
exemption from the Fair Housing Act's prohibition against familial
status discrimination at 42 U.S.C. 3607(b)(2).
Another change this proposed rule would make is to Sec.
266.420(b)(4), which currently requires that, in periodic advances
cases, HFAs provide a certification that periodic advances were made
proportionate to construction progress as part of their closing
dockets. However, Sec. 266.310, entitled, ``Insurance of advances or
insurance upon completion; applicability of requirements,'' does not
require periodic advances to be made proportionate to construction
progress. This proposed rule therefore revises Sec. 266.420(b)(4) to
remove the requirement that periodic advances be proportionate to
construction progress, and instead requires that, as part of their
closing documents, in periodic advances cases HFAs provide
[[Page 12055]]
certification that the advances were made in accordance with the
mortgage pursuant to Sec. 266.310.
This proposed rule would also revise Sec. 266.650, Items deducted
from total loss, to clarify that where a full claim follows a partial
payment of claim by HUD, that partial payment of claim is considered an
amount received by the HFA that will be deducted from the total loss to
be shared by HUD and the HFA. The existing regulatory language does not
explicitly provide this.
Another change this proposed rule would make to reflect current
program practices is to clarify that where HUD may direct or review an
HFA's underwriting standards and loan terms and conditions, it may also
direct or review that HFA's asset management and servicing procedures.
Thus, this proposed rule adds references to ``asset management and
servicing procedures'' throughout, and adds a new paragraph to Sec.
266.500 that explains that asset management and servicing procedures of
any HFA electing to take less than 50 percent of the risk on certain
projects are subject to review, modification, and approval by HUD.
This proposed rule also makes changes for accuracy, such as
deleting the parenthetical in Sec. 266.100(b)(1) that suggests that
Level I approval is where an HFA assumes a percentage of the risk of
loss in ``(increments of 10 percent),'' because the risk percentages
are not limited to 10 percent increments.
E. Aligning Section 542(c) With Other FHA Programs
Section 266.200(d) currently provides that projects receiving
Section 8 rental subsidies or other rental subsidies may be insured
only if the mortgage does not exceed an amount supportable by the lower
of contract rents under the rental assistance agreement or market
rents. However, under HUD's Supportive Housing program, authorized
under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q), a
project may be insured if the loan is underwritten to contract rents,
regardless of market rents. This proposed rule would amend Sec.
266.200(d) so that Supportive Housing program projects of HFAs assuming
at least 50 percent of the risk of loss on mortgages insured under the
Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program would be subject to the same
underwriting standard as other Section 202 projects in that the loans
may be underwritten to contract rents. A similar change is incorporated
in new Sec. 266.200(c)(7) for existing projects without substantial
rehabilitation. These changes will better align requirements between
HUD programs, thereby streamlining and facilitating program
administration by HFAs, as well as HUD oversight.
FHA currently requires a National Loan Committee to approve all
large loans under the Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) Guide as
a means of managing risk. Loans of HFAs that assume less than 50
percent of the risk of loss pose a similar risk to FHA as do MAP loans.
Therefore, this proposed rule would amend Sec. 266.305(a),
establishing the underwriting standards for HFAs accepting less than 50
percent of the risk, to add a provision that large loans also require
prior approval by the FHA Commissioner. What constitutes a large loan
will be determined using the same process currently used by HUD for
establishing large loan amounts in other FHA programs.
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 266.200(b)(2), the
explanation of substantial rehabilitation projects eligible for the
Section 542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program, so that substantial
rehabilitation would occur when the scope of work to improve an
existing project exceeds in aggregate cost a sum equal to the base per
dwelling unit limit times the applicable high cost factor established
by the Commissioner, or when the scope of work involves the replacement
of two or more building systems. `Replacement' is when the cost of
replacement work exceeds 50% of the cost of replacing the entire
system. The base per dwelling unit limit is $15,000 per unit for 2015,
and will be adjusted annually based on the percentage change in the
consumer price index. The rationale for the revision is twofold: The
current definition of substantial rehabilitation as work that exceeds
15% of the project's value results in a disproportionate impact to
projects in high cost areas, particularly for preservation efforts that
involve moderate rehabilitation; and the proposed change makes the
program standard comparable to other similar FHA multifamily insurance
programs that are required to impose prevailing wage requirements.
Additionally, this proposed rule would revise Sec. Sec. 266.600,
266.602, and 266.604, which currently refer to specific prescribed
percentages for calculating an HFA's mortgage insurance premium (MIP).
These set percentages are no longer appropriate now that the Section
542(c) HFA Risk-Sharing program is no longer a pilot. This proposed
rule would revise the regulations to permit MIP changes for the HFA
Risk-Sharing program to be published through Federal Register notice,
with an opportunity for public comment, as is the case for other FHA
programs.
F. Editorial Changes
Finally, this proposed rule makes a number of minor editorial
changes to improve readability and clarity, and to ensure consistency
and accuracy within the rule. For example, this proposed rule,
throughout, adds and updates reference citations, standardizes the case
of the term ``contract of insurance,'' replaces the term ``HUD Field
Office'' with ``local HUD office,'' deletes the term ``his or her''
where it is unnecessary, specifies that references to days are measured
in calendar days, and replaces a reference to the ``Office of General
Counsel'' with simply ``HUD.'' HUD also has revised Sec.
266.225(a)(1)(i) to clarify HUD's intent that Davis-Bacon wage
requirements apply only where advances that are for construction of the
project are insured under Part 266. This intent is reflected in Sec.
266.225(d)(2) of the current regulation, which requires that no advance
for a project subject to Davis-Bacon requirements shall be insured
unless a certificate is filed with the application for the advance
certifying that the laborers and mechanics employed in the construction
of the project have been paid the Davis-Bacon prevailing wages. HUD has
also revised Sec. 266.225(c) to clarify that HUD has responsibility
for enforcing Davis-Bacon labor standards under this section, and has
revised Sec. 266.630(d)(2) to clarify that partial claim payments are
limited to the amount specified. HUD has made similar editorial changes
of this nature.
III. Justification for Reduced Comment Period
For proposed rules issued for public comment, it is HUD's policy to
afford the public ``not less than sixty days for submission of
comments'' (24 CFR 10.1). In cases in which HUD determines that a
shorter public comment period may be appropriate, it is also HUD's
policy to provide an explanation of why the public comment period has
been abbreviated. For the following reasons, HUD believes that a
reduced 30-day comment period is justified for this proposed
rulemaking.
This proposed rule updates regulations for the Section 542(c) HFA
Risk-Sharing program to reflect statutory changes and to revise
outdated references. These regulatory changes are technical and non-
substantive. The proposed rule also better aligns HUD's regulations
with current industry and current HUD practices and policies, and
provides greater flexibility to HUD in operating the program and to
certain
[[Page 12056]]
HFA's. In general, these amendments alleviate the administrative
burdens imposed on program participants.
Further, these policy changes have already been discussed with, and
are supported by stakeholders. From 2011-2013, HUD discussed proposed
changes to the Risk-Sharing program with the National Council of State
Housing Agencies (NCSHA) and a working group of HFAs. In October, 2014,
HUD circulated a summary matrix of proposed changes to the program to
NCSHA and HFAs and requested input on the proposals. Comments from
NCSHA and HFAs have been overwhelmingly supportive of almost all of the
revisions in the proposed rule.
Although HUD believes that an abbreviated comment period is
appropriate, HUD welcomes public input and is soliciting comments for a
period of 30-days. All comments will be considered in the development
of the final rule.
IV. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a regulatory action is significant
and therefore, subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the order. Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review) directs executive
agencies to analyze regulations that are ``outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify, streamline,
expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned.''
This proposed rule updates HUD's regulations pertaining to Housing
Finance Agency Risk Sharing Program for Insured Affordable Multifamily
Project Loans, codified in 24 CFR part 266. The program regulations
were initially promulgated in 1994, with the last updates undertaken in
2000, but only to a few regulatory sections. This update is undertaken
to reflect statutory changes and revise outdated references and
terminology. The proposed rule also better aligns HUD's regulations
with current industry and current HUD practices and policies. These
changes would not create additional significant burdens for the public.
As a result, this rule was determined to not be a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and therefore was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The majority of the proposed regulatory amendments would update the
regulations governing HUD's HFA Risk-Sharing program to conform to
current industry practices and FHA policies with which HFAs and other
program participants are already familiar. Other proposed regulatory
changes will provide greater flexibility for HFAs, alleviating
administrative burden and related costs of operating the program. While
there may be some costs for HFAs to update their practices and
procedures to reflect some of the regulatory changes, these costs are
minimal in comparison to the streamlining benefits provided by the
revised program regulations.
For the reasons presented, the undersigned certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has Federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This proposed rule would not have
Federalism implications and would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive order.
Environmental Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment
has been made in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 50,
which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The Finding of No Significant
Impact is available for public inspection during regular business hours
in the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500. Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, please schedule an appointment to review the
Finding by calling the Regulations Division at (202) 402-3055 (this is
not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments
may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at
(800) 877-8339.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4; approved March 22, 1995) (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state,
local, and tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed
rule does not impose any Federal mandates on any state, local, or
tribal government, or on the private sector, within the meaning of the
UMRA.
Information Collection Requirements
The information collection requirements contained in this proposed
rule have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2502-0500. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information,
unless the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Program number
for the Housing Finance Agencies Section 542(c) Risk Sharing Program is
14.188.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 266
Intergovernmental relations, Low and moderate income housing,
Mortgage insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, HUD proposes to amend 24
CFR part 266 as follows:
PART 266--HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY RISK-SHARING PROGRAM FOR INSURED
AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY PROJECT LOANS
0
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 266 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1715z-22.; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
0
2. Amend part 266 by removing the words ``Contract of Insurance'' and
add in their place the words ``contract of insurance'' wherever they
occur.
0
3. Revise Sec. 266.1 to read as follows:
[[Page 12057]]
Sec. 266.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) Authority and scope. (1) Section 542 of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z-22), directs the
Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),
acting through the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), to carry out
programs that will provide new forms of Federal credit enhancement for
multifamily loans. Section 542, entitled, ``Multifamily Mortgage Credit
Programs,'' provides insurance authority independent from that provided
by the National Housing Act.
(2) Section 542(c) of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1992 specifically directs HUD to carry out a program of risk-sharing
with qualified State and local housing finance agencies (HFAs). The
qualified HFAs are authorized to underwrite and process loans. HUD
provides full mortgage insurance on affordable multifamily housing
projects processed by such HFAs under this program. Through risk-
sharing agreements with HUD, HFAs contract to reimburse HUD for a
portion of the loss from any defaults that occur while HUD insurance is
in force.
(3) The extent to which HUD directs qualified HFAs regarding their
underwriting standards, loan terms and conditions, and asset management
and servicing procedures is related to the proportion of the risk taken
by an HFA.
(b) Purpose. The primary purpose of this program is to provide
credit enhancement for multifamily loans, i.e., utilization of full
insurance by HUD, pursuant to risk-sharing agreements with qualified
housing finance agencies, for the development of affordable housing.
The utilization of Federal credit enhancements increases access to
capital markets and, thereby, increases the supply of affordable
multifamily housing. By permitting HFAs to underwrite, process, and
service loans and to manage and dispose of properties that fall into
default, affordable housing is made available to eligible families and
individuals in a timely manner.
0
4. Amend Sec. 266.5 as follows:
0
a. Remove ``, as amended'' from the definition of ``Act'';
0
b. Revise the definition of ``Affordable housing'';
0
c. Remove from the definition of ``Commissioner'' the words ``his or
her'' and add in their place the words ``the Commissioner's'';
0
d. Revise the definition of ``Credit subsidy'';
0
e. Remove from the definition of ``Designated offices'' the words ``HUD
Field Offices'' and add in their place the words ``local HUD offices'';
0
f. Remove the definition of ``Gross rent'';
0
g. Remove from the definition of ``Multifamily housing'' the word
``Secretary'' and add in its place the word ``Commissioner''; and
0
h. Remove the definition of ``Supportive services''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 266.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
Affordable housing means a project that meets the requirements for
a qualified low-income housing project under section 42(g) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 42(g)). For purposes of this
part, the reference to a utility allowance in 26 U.S.C. 42(g) includes
charges for the occupancy of a cooperative unit.
* * * * *
Credit subsidy means the cost of a direct loan or loan guarantee
under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (subtitle B of title XIII
of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Public Law 101-508,
approved Nov. 5, 1990).
* * * * *
Sec. 266.10 [Removed]
0
5. Remove Sec. 266.10.
0
6. Revise Sec. 266.30 to read as follows:
Sec. 266.30 Nonapplicability of 24 CFR part 246.
The regulations at 24 CFR part 246, pertaining to local rent
control, do not apply to projects that are security for mortgages
insured under this part.
0
7. In Sec. 266.100:
0
a. Revise the first sentence of paragraph (a);
0
b. Revise paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6)(i), and(b)(1);
0
c. Revise the introductory text of paragraph (b)(2);
0
d. Revise paragraph (b)(3); and
0
e. Add paragraph (b)(4).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 266.100 Qualified housing finance agency (HFA).
(a) Qualifications. To participate in the program, an HFA must
apply and be specifically approved for the program described in this
part, in addition to being approved as a mortgagee under Sec. 202.10
of this part. * * *
(1) Carry an issuer credit rating of ``A'' or better, or an
equivalent as evaluated by Standard and Poor's or any other nationally
recognized rating agency; or
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(i) The Department of Justice has not brought a civil rights suit
against the HFA, and no suit is pending;
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Level I approval to originate, service, and dispose of
multifamily mortgages where the HFA uses its own underwriting
standards, loan terms and conditions, and asset management and
servicing procedures, and assumes 50 to 90 percent of the risk of loss
(in 10 percent increments).
(2) Level II approval to originate, service, and dispose of
multifamily mortgages where the HFA uses underwriting standards, loan
terms and conditions, and asset management and servicing procedures
approved by HUD, and:
* * * * *
(3) For HFAs who plan to use Level I and Level II processing, the
underwriting standards, loan terms and conditions, and asset management
and servicing procedures to be used on Level II loans must be approved
by HUD.
(4) Every five years, HUD will review the underwriting standards,
loan terms and conditions, and asset management and servicing
procedures for HFAs with Level II approval. HUD may require changes to
these procedures as a condition for continued Level II approval.
0
8. Revise Sec. 266.105(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.105 Application requirements.
* * * * *
(b) Applications for participation in program. Applications from
HFAs for approval to participate in the program under this part may be
submitted at any time, and must be submitted in the form and manner
established by HUD.
0
9. In Sec. 266.110, revise the paragraph heading and the first
sentence of paragraph (a) and the third sentence of paragraph (b)(1) to
read as follows:
Sec. 266.110 Reserve requirements.
(a) HFAs with an issuer credit rating of ``A'' or better or overall
rating of ``A'' on general obligation bonds. An HFA with an issuer
credit rating of ``A'' or better, or an equivalent designation, or an
HFA with an overall rating of ``A'' on its general obligation bonds, is
not required to have additional reserves so long as the HFA maintains
that designation or rating, unless the Commissioner determines that a
prescribed level of reserves is necessary. * * *
* * * * *
(b) * * *
[[Page 12058]]
(1) * * * The account must be established prior to the execution of
any risk-sharing agreement under this part in an initial amount of not
less than $500,000. * * *
* * * * *
Sec. 266.115 [Amended]
0
10. Amend Sec. 266.115 to remove the words ``his or her'' from the
first sentence in paragraph (a) and from paragraph (c).
0
11. In Sec. 266.120, revise paragraphs (d) and (e)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 266.120 Actions for which sanctions may be imposed.
* * * * *
(d) Actions or conduct for which sanctions may be imposed against
the HFA by HUD's Mortgagee Review Board under 24 CFR 25.9, which
pertains to ``notice of administrative action''.
(e) * * *
(5) Maintain an issuer credit rating of ``A'' or better, or an
equivalent designation, or overall rating of ``A'' on general
obligation bonds (or if such rating is lost, comply with paragraph
(e)(6) of this section);
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec. 266.125, revise paragraph (a)(6), add paragraph (a)(8),
and revise the first sentence of paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.125 Scope and nature of sanctions.
(a) * * *
(6) Recommend to the Commissioner that the HFA's mortgagee approval
be withdrawn pursuant to 24 CFR part 25 (regulations of the Mortgagee
Review Board) and/or that penalties be imposed pursuant to 24 CFR part
30 (regulations pertaining to Civil Money Penalties; Certain Prohibited
Contact);
* * * * *
(8) Require the HFA to revise any or all of its underwriting,
processing, asset management, or servicing policies and procedures as
directed by the Commissioner.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Any sanction imposed by a designated office in writing will be
immediately effective, will state the grounds for the action, and
provide for the HFA's right to an informal hearing before the
designated office representative or designee in the designated office.
* * *
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec. 266.200:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(2), (c), (d), (e), and (g);
0
b. Redesignate paragraph (h) as paragraph (i); and
0
c. Add new paragraph (h).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 266.200 Eligible projects.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Substantial rehabilitation occurs when the scope of work to
improve an existing project exceeds in aggregate cost a sum equal to
the base per dwelling unit limit times the applicable high cost factor
established by the Commissioner, or when the scope of work involves the
replacement of two or more building systems. Replacement is when the
cost of replacement work exceeds 50% of the cost of replacing the
entire system. The base per dwelling unit limit is $15,000 for 2015,
and will be adjusted annually based on the percentage change in the
consumer price index.
(c) Existing projects. Financing of existing properties for
acquisition or refinancing without substantial rehabilitation is
allowed.
(1) If the financing will result in the preservation of affordable
housing, where the property will be maintained as affordable housing
for a period of at least 20 years, regardless of whether the loan is
prepaid; and
(2) Project occupancy is not less than 93 percent (to include
consideration of rent in arrears), based on the average occupancy in
the project over the most recent 12 months; and
(3) The loan to be refinanced has not been in default within the 12
months prior to the date of the application for refinancing; and
(4) If applicable, the owner of the property agrees to renew the
Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract for a 20-year term; and
(5) Existing and post-refinance HAP residual receipts are set aside
to be used to reduce future HAP payments; and
(6) A capital needs assessment must be performed and funds escrowed
for all necessary repairs and replacement reserves funded for future
capital repairs; and
(7) The HUD-insured mortgage does not exceed an amount supportable
by the lower of the unit rents being collected under the rental
assistance agreement or the unit rents being collected at unassisted
projects in the market area that are similar in amenities and location
to the project for which insurance is being requested, although this
paragraph does not apply to Level I participants if those projects are
financed under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C.
1701q); and
(8) For Level II participants only, the HUD-insured mortgage may
not exceed the sum of the existing indebtedness, cost of refinancing,
or acquisition, the cost of repairs and reasonable transaction costs as
determined by the Commissioner. This paragraph does not apply to Level
I participants.
(d) Projects receiving section 8 rental subsidies or other rental
subsidies. Projects receiving project-based housing assistance payments
under section 8 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f) or
other rental subsidies and meeting the requirements of this part may be
insured under this part only if the mortgage does not exceed an amount
supportable by the lower of the unit rents being or to be collected
under the rental assistance agreement or the unit rents being collected
at unassisted projects in the market that are similar in amenities and
location to the project for which insurance is being requested. This
paragraph does not apply to projects of Level I participants if those
projects are financed under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12
U.S.C. 1701q).
(e) SRO projects. Single room occupancy (SRO) projects, as defined
in Sec. 266.5, are eligible for insurance under this part. Units in
SRO projects must be subject to 30-calendar day or longer leases;
however, rent payments may be made on a weekly basis in SRO projects.
* * * * *
(g) Elderly projects. Projects or parts of projects specifically
designed for the use and occupancy by elderly families. An elderly
family means any household where the head or spouse is 62 years of age
or older, including children under 18, and also any single person who
is 62 years of age or older.
(h) Housing for older persons. Projects eligible for and in
compliance with 42 U.S.C. 3607(b) and 24 CFR part 100, subpart E.
* * * * *
Sec. 266.205 [Amended]
0
14. Amend Sec. 266.205 by adding the word ``calendar'' after the
number ``30'' in paragraph (a)(1) and adding the letters ``U.S.''
before the term ``Department of Defense'' in paragraph (b)(2).
0
15. In Sec. 266.210:
0
a. Remove paragraph (b);
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) as paragraphs (b), (c) and
(d), respectively; and
0
c. Revise newly redesignated paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.210 HUD-retained review functions.
* * * * *
[[Page 12059]]
(c) Subsidy layering. The Commissioner, or Housing Credit Agencies
as defined by section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26
U.S.C. 42), through such delegation as may be in effect by regulation
hereafter, shall review all projects receiving tax credits and some
form of HUD assistance for any excess subsidy provided to individual
projects and reduce subsidy sources in accordance with outstanding
guidelines.
(d) Davis-Bacon Act. The Commissioner shall obtain and provide to
the HFA the appropriate U.S. Department of Labor wage rate
determinations under the Davis-Bacon Act, where they apply under this
part.
0
16. Revise Sec. 266.215(e) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.215 Functions delegated by HUD to HFAs.
* * * * *
(e) Lead-based paint. The HFA will perform functions related to
Lead-based paint requirements as set forth in 24 CFR part 35, subparts
A, B, G, and R.
0
17. Add Sec. 266.217 to read as follows:
Sec. 266.217 Environmental review requirements.
The responsible entity, as defined in 24 CFR part 58 (Environmental
Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental
Responsibilities), assumes legal responsibility for compliance with the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
related laws and authorities. The responsible entity will visit each
project site proposed for insurance under this part and prepare the
applicable environmental reviews as set forth in 24 CFR part 58. HUD
may make a finding in accordance with 24 CFR 58.11 and may perform the
environmental review itself under 24 CFR part 50 (Protection and
Enhancement of Environmental Quality). In all cases the environmental
review must be completed before HUD may issue the firm approval letter.
0
18. Revise Sec. 266.220 to read as follows:
Sec. 266.220 Nondiscrimination in housing and employment.
The mortgagor must certify to the HFA that, so long as the mortgage
is insured under this part, the mortgagor will:
(a) Not use tenant selection procedures that discriminate against
families with children, except in the case of a project qualifying for
and complying with the requirements of the ``housing for older
persons'' exemption, as defined in section 807(b)(2) of the Fair
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3607(b)) and further described in 24 CFR part
100, subpart E. Projects receiving Federal financial assistance in
which elderly families include minor children may not avail themselves
of the housing for older persons exemption;
(b) Determine eligibility for admission and continued occupancy
without regard to actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender
identity, or marital status and refrain from inquiries about sexual
orientation and gender identity in accordance with 24 CFR 5.105(a)(2);
(c)(1) Comply with:
(i) The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 through 3619), as
implemented by 24 CFR part 100;
(ii) Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 through 12213), as implemented by 28 CFR part 35;
(iii) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968
(12 U.S.C. 1701u), as implemented by 24 CFR part 135;
(iv) The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S C. 1691-1691f), as
implemented by 12 CFR part 202;
(v) Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259 (3
CFR 1958-1963 Comp., p. 652 and 3 CFR 1980 Comp., p. 307), and
implemented by 24 CFR part 107;
(vi) Executive Order 11246 (3 CFR 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339), as
implemented by 41 CFR part 60; and
(vii) Other applicable Federal laws and regulations issued pursuant
to these authorities; and applicable State and local fair housing and
equal opportunity laws.
(2) In addition to the authorities listed in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, a mortgagor that receives Federal financial assistance
must also certify to the HFA that, so long as the mortgage is insured
under this part, it will comply with:
(i) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), as
implemented by 24 CFR part 1;
(ii) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 through
6107), as implemented by 24 CFR part 146; and
(iii) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C.
794), as implemented by 24 CFR part 8.
0
19. In Sec. 266.225, revise the introductory text of paragraph (a)(1),
and revise paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (b), (c), (d)(1), and the second
sentence of paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.225 Labor standards.
(a) * * *
(1) All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or
subcontractors on a project insured under this part shall be paid not
less than the wages prevailing in the locality in which the work was
performed for the corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics
employed in construction of a similar character, as determined by the
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor (Secretary of Labor) in
accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141 et
seq.), where the project meets all of the following conditions:
(i) Advances for construction of the project are insured under this
part;
* * * * *
(b) Volunteers. The provisions of this section shall not apply to
volunteers under the conditions set out in 24 CFR part 70 (Use of
Volunteers on Projects Subject to Davis-Bacon and HUD-Determined Wage
Rates). In applying 24 CFR part 70, insurance under this part shall be
treated as a program for which there is a statutory exemption for
volunteers.
(c) Labor standards. Any contract, subcontract, or building loan
agreement executed for a project subject to Davis-Bacon wage rates
under paragraph (a) of this section shall comply with all labor
standards and provisions of the U.S. Department of Labor regulations in
29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 that would be applicable to a mortgage
insurance program to which Davis-Bacon wage rates are made applicable
by statute, provided, that regulatory provisions relating to
investigations and enforcement by the U.S. Department of Labor shall
not be applicable, and enforcement of Davis-Bacon labor standards shall
be the responsibility of the Commissioner in accordance with paragraph
(e) of this section.
(d) * * *
(1) No advance under a mortgage on a project subject to Davis-Bacon
wage rates under paragraph (a) of this section shall be eligible for
insurance under this part unless the HFA determines (in accordance with
the Commissioner's administrative procedures) that the general
contractor or any subcontractor or any firm, corporation, partnership
or association in which the contractor or subcontractor has a
substantial interest was not, on the date the contract or subcontract
was executed, on the ineligible list established by the Comptroller
General of the United States, pursuant 29 CFR 5.12, issued by the
Secretary of Labor.
* * * * *
(e) * * * Where routine administration and enforcement functions
are delegated to the HFA, the HFA shall bear financial responsibility
for any deficiency in payment of prevailing wages or, where applicable
[[Page 12060]]
under 29 CFR part 1 (Procedures for Predetermination of Wage Rates),
any increase in compensation to a contractor, that is attributable to
any failure properly to carry out its delegated functions. * * *
0
20. In Sec. 266.300:
0
a. Revise paragraph (b)(1);
0
b. Redesignate existing paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) as
paragraphs (b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6), respectively;
0
c. Add new paragraph (b)(3);
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (b)(5); and
0
e. Revise paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 266.300 HFAs accepting 50 percent or more of risk.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Determine that a market for the project exists, taking into
consideration any comments from the local HUD office relative to the
potential adverse impact the project will have on existing or proposed
Federally insured and assisted projects in the area.
* * * * *
(3) Arrange for the performance of an environmental review in
accordance with Sec. 266.217;
* * * * *
(5) Approve the Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan, required
by Sec. 266.215(a); and
* * * * *
(c) HUD-retained reviews. After positive completion of the HUD-
retained reviews specified in Sec. 266.210(a) and (b) the local HUD
office will issue a firm approval letter.
* * * * *
0
21. In Sec. 266.305:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (a) and (b)(1);
0
b. Redesignate existing paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) as
paragraphs (b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6), respectively;
0
c. Add new paragraph (b)(3);
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (b)(5), and
0
e. Revise paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 266.305 HFAs accepting less than 50 percent of risk.
(a) Underwriting standards. The underwriting standards and loan
terms and conditions of any HFA electing to take less than 50 percent
of the risk on certain projects are subject to review, modification,
and approval by HUD in accordance with Sec. 266.100(b). These HFAs may
assume 25 percent or 10 percent of the risk depending upon the loan-to-
replacement-cost or loan-to-value ratios of the projects to be insured
as specified in Sec. 266.100(b)(2)(i) and (ii). Large loans, as
defined by HUD for its insured multifamily mortgage programs, require
prior approval by the Commissioner.
(b) * * *
(1) Determine that a market for the project exists, taking into
consideration any comments from the local HUD office relative to the
potential adverse impact the project will have on existing or proposed
Federally insured and assisted projects in the area;
* * * * *
(3) Arrange for the performance of an environmental review in
accordance with Sec. 266.217;
* * * * *
(5) Approve the Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan, required
by Sec. 266.215(a); and
* * * * *
(c) HUD-retained reviews. After positive completion of the HUD-
retained reviews specified in Sec. 266.210(a) and (b), the local HUD
office will issue a firm approval letter.
* * * * *
0
22. In Sec. 266.410, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.410 Mortgage provisions.
* * * * *
(e) Amortization. The mortgage must provide for complete
amortization (i.e., be regularly amortizing) over the term of the
mortgage. The complete amortization requirement does not apply to:
(1) Construction loans, or
(2) Level I participants where the loan has a minimum term of 17
years and the HFA's underwriting standards, loan terms and conditions,
and asset management and servicing procedures have been approved by
HUD.
* * * * *
0
23. In Sec. 266.420, revise the second sentence of paragraph (a) and
paragraphs (b)(3), (4), and (7), and add paragraph (b)(13) to read as
follows:
Sec. 266.420 Closing and endorsement by the Commissioner.
(a) * * * The note must provide that the mortgage is insured under
section 542(c) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 and
the regulations set forth in this part that are in effect on the date
of endorsement. * * *
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Certification that the loan has been processed, prudently
underwritten (including a determination that a market exists for the
project), cost certified (if the project is being submitted for final
endorsement) and closed in full compliance with the HFA's standards and
requirements (or where the mortgage is insured under Level II, in full
compliance with the underwriting standards, loan terms and conditions,
and asset management and servicing procedures, as approved by HUD).
(4) At the time of final endorsement, for periodic advances cases,
a certification that the advances were made in accordance with the
mortgage pursuant to Sec. 266.310.
* * * * *
(7) A certification that the HFA has reviewed and approved the
Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan, required by Sec. 266.215(a),
and found it acceptable.
* * * * *
(13) Certification that housing claiming the housing for older
persons exemption is eligible for and complies with 42 U.S.C. 3607(b)
and 24 CFR part 100, subpart E.
0
24. Revise Sec. 266.500 to read as follows:
Sec. 266.500 General.
(a) HFA responsibility for monitoring project owners. The HFA will
have full responsibility for managing and servicing projects insured
under this part (in accordance with procedures disclosed and submitted
with its application and the requirements of this part). The HFA is
responsible for monitoring and determining the compliance of the
project owner in accordance with the provisions of this subpart. HUD
will monitor the performance of the HFA, not the project owner, to
determine its compliance with the provisions covered under this
subpart.
(b) HUD review of procedures for HFAs with Level II approval. Asset
management and servicing procedures of any HFA electing to take less
than 50 percent of the risk on certain projects are subject to review,
modification, and approval by HUD in accordance with Sec. 266.100(b).
Sec. 266.505 [Amended]
0
25. Amend Sec. 266.505:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(8), after the word ``Plan'' by adding the phrase
``, required by Sec. 266.215(a),'';
0
b. In paragraph (b)(10), by removing the words ``General Accounting''
and adding in their place ``U.S. Government Accountability''.
0
26. Revise Sec. 266.507 to read as follows:
Sec. 266.507 Maintenance requirements.
The mortgagor must maintain the project in accordance with the
physical
[[Page 12061]]
condition standards in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G (Physical Condition
Standards and Inspection Requirements).
0
27. Revise Sec. 266.510(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.510 HFA responsibilities.
(a) Inspections. The HFA must perform inspections in accordance
with the physical inspection procedures in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G
(Physical Condition Standards and Inspection Requirements).
* * * * *
0
28. Revise Sec. 266.600 to read as follows:
Sec. 266.600 Mortgage insurance premium: insurance upon completion.
(a) Initial premium. For projects insured upon completion, on the
date of the final closing, the HFA shall pay to the Commissioner an
initial premium in an amount established by the Commissioner under
Sec. 266.604.
(b) Premium payable with first payment of principal. On the date of
the first payment of principal the HFA shall pay a second premium
(calculated on a per annum basis) in an amount established by the
Commissioner under Sec. 266.604.
(c) Subsequent premiums. Until one of the conditions is met under
Sec. 266.606(a), the HFA on each anniversary of the date of the first
principal payment shall pay to the Commissioner an annual mortgage
insurance premium in an amount established by the Commissioner under
Sec. 266.604, without taking into account delinquent payments, or
partial claim payment under Sec. 266.630, or prepayments, for the year
following the date on which the premium becomes payable.
0
29. In Sec. 266.602, revise paragraph (a), the first sentence of
paragraph (b), the first sentence of paragraph (c), and paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
Sec. 266.602 Mortgage insurance premium: Insured advances.
(a) Initial premium. For projects involving insured advances, on
the date of the initial closing, the HFA shall pay to the Commissioner
an initial premium equal to an amount established by the Commissioner
under Sec. 266.604.
(b) Interim premium. On each anniversary of the initial closing,
the HFA shall pay an interim mortgage insurance premium in an amount
established by the Commissioner under Sec. 266.604. * * *
(c) Premium payable with first payment of principal. On the date of
the first principal payment, the HFA shall pay a mortgage insurance
premium in an amount established by the Commissioner under Sec.
266.604. * * *
(d) Subsequent premiums. Until one of the conditions is met under
Sec. 266.606(a), the HFA on each anniversary of the date of the first
principal payment shall pay to the Commissioner an annual mortgage
insurance premium in an amount established by the Commissioner under
Sec. 266.604, without taking into account delinquent payments,
prepayments, or a partial claim payment under Sec. 266.630, for the
year following the date on which the premium becomes payable.
0
30. In Sec. 266.604, revise paragraphs (a) and (b), the first sentence
of paragraph (c), and the second and third sentences of paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
Sec. 266.604 Mortgage insurance premium: Other requirements.
(a) Premium calculations on or after first principal payment. The
premiums payable to the Commissioner on and after the first principal
payment shall be calculated in accordance with the amortization
schedule prepared by the HFA for final closing and an amount
established by the Commissioner through a notice published in the
Federal Register and providing a 30-day comment period. After the
comments have been considered, HUD will publish a final notice
announcing the premium and its effective date. The premium shall not
take into account delinquent payments or prepayments.
(b) Future premium changes. Notice of future premium changes will
be published in the Federal Register. The Commissioner will propose
mortgage insurance premium changes for the Risk-Sharing Program and
provide a 30-calendar day public comment period for the purpose of
accepting comments on whether the proposed changes are appropriate.
After the comments have been considered, HUD will publish a final
notice announcing the premium and its effective date.
(c) Closing information. The HFA shall provide final closing
information to the Commissioner within 15 calendar days of the final
closing in a format prescribed by the Commissioner. * * *
(d) Due date for premium payments. * * * Any premium received by
the Commissioner more than 15 calendar days after the due date shall be
assessed a late charge of 4 percent of the amount of the premium
payment due. Mortgage insurance premiums that are paid to the
Commissioner more than 30 calendar days after the due date shall begin
to accrue interest at the rate prescribed by the Treasury Fiscal
Requirements Manual.
0
31. In Sec. 266.620:
0
a. Revise the section heading;
0
b. Redesignate the undesignated introductory paragraph as paragraph (a)
and redesignate existing paragraphs (a) through (g), as paragraphs
(a)(1) through (7), respectively; and
0
c. Add a new paragraph (b).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 266.620 Termination of contract of insurance and
indemnification.
* * * * *
(b) In lieu of termination of the mortgage insurance contract
pursuant to paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the Commissioner may, in
his or her full discretion, permit a Level I participant rated ``A'' or
higher to indemnify HUD, or otherwise reimburse HUD in a manner
acceptable to the Commissioner, for the full amount of the mortgage
claim.
0
32. In Sec. 266.626, revise the first sentence of paragraph (c) and
revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.626 Notice and date of termination by the Commissioner.
* * * * *
(c) Notice of default. If a default (as defined in paragraph (a) of
this section) continues for a period of 30 calendar days, the HFA must
notify the Commissioner within 10 calendar days thereafter, unless the
default is cured within the 30-day period. * * *
(d) Timing of claim filing. Unless a written extension is granted
by HUD, the HFA must file an application for initial claim payment (or,
if appropriate, for partial claim payment) within 75 calendar days from
the date of default and may do so as early as the first day of the
month following the month for which a payment was missed. Upon request
of the HFA, HUD may extend, up to 180 calendar days from the date of
default, the deadline for filing a claim. In those cases where the HFA
certifies that the project owner is in the process of transacting a
bond refunder, refinancing the mortgage, or changing the ownership for
the purpose of curing the default and bringing the mortgage current,
HUD may extend the deadline for filing a claim beyond 180 calendar
days, not to exceed 360 calendar days from the date of default.
0
33. Revise Sec. 266.628(a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.628 Initial claim payments.
(a) * * *
(3) The HFA must use the proceeds of the initial claim payment to
retire any bonds or any other financing mechanisms securing the
mortgage
[[Page 12062]]
within 30 calendar days of the initial claim payment. Any excess funds
resulting from such retirement or repayment shall be returned to HUD
within 30 calendar days of the retirement.
* * * * *
0
34. In Sec. 266.630, revise the second sentence of paragraph (c)(2),
paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (4), and the second sentence of paragraph
(d)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.630 Partial payment of claims.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * * The HFA is granted an extension of 30 calendar days from
the date of any notification for further action.
(d) Requirements--(1) One partial claim payment. Only one partial
claim payment may be made under a contract of insurance.
(2) Partial claim payment amount. The amount of the partial claim
payment is limited to 50% of the amount of relief provided by the HFA
in the form of a reduction in principal and a reduction of delinquent
interest due on the insured mortgage times the lesser of HUD's
percentage of the risk of loss or 50 percent.
* * * * *
(4) Partial claim repayment by HFA. The HFA must remit to HUD a
percentage of all amounts collected on the HFA's second mortgage within
15 calendar days of receipt by the HFA. The applicable percentage is
equal to the percentage used in paragraph (d)(2) of this section to
determine the partial claim payment amount. Payments made after the
15th day must include a 5 percent late charge plus accrued interest at
the Debenture rate.
(5) * * * The HFA must submit a final certified statement within 30
calendar days after the second mortgage is paid in full, foreclosed, or
otherwise terminated.
Sec. 266.634 [Amended]
0
35. Amend Sec. 266.634(c) by adding the word ``calendar'' immediately
before the word ``days'' in the first sentence.
Sec. 266.638 [Amended]
0
36. Amend Sec. 266.638 to:
0
a. Add the word ``calendar'' immediately before the word ``days'' in
the first sentence of paragraph (a);
0
b. Remove the word ``five'' from the second sentence of paragraph (b),
and add in its place the number ``5'';
0
c. Remove the words ``five year'' from the third sentence of paragraph
(b) and add in their place ``5-year''.
Sec. 266.642 [Amended]
0
37. Amend the third sentence of Sec. 266.642 to remove the phrase
``45-day'' and in its place add the phrase ``45-calendar day''.
Sec. 266.644 [Amended]
0
38. Amend Sec. 266.644 to add the word ``calendar'' before the word
``days'' in the undesignated introductory paragraph
Sec. 266.648 [Amended]
0
39. Amend Sec. 266.648(c)(4) to remove the words ``the Office of
General Counsel'' and add in their place ``HUD''.
0
40. In Sec. 266.650, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 266.650 Items deducted from total loss.
* * * * *
(a) All amounts received by the HFA on account of the mortgage
after the date of default, including any partial payment of claim paid
by HUD in the event a full claim follows a partial payment of claim;
* * * * *
Sec. 266.654 [Amended]
0
41. Amend Sec. 266.654(b) to add the word ``calendar'' before the word
``days'' in the first sentence.
Dated: February 25, 2016.
Edward Golding,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing.
[FR Doc. 2016-04595 Filed 3-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P