Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children, 11698-11706 [2016-04970]
Download as PDF
11698
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
[Docket ID: DOD–2014–OS–0020]
way and minimize school disruptions
for military children transferring from
one state school system to another. The
compact consists of general policies in
four key areas: Eligibility, enrollment,
placement and graduation. Children of
active duty members of the uniformed
services, National Guard and Reserve on
active duty orders, and members or
veterans who are medically discharged
or retired for one year are eligible for
assistance under the Compact.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, Regulatory and Audit
Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–9010.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcus Beauregard, 571–372–5357.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 0790–AJ33
Executive Summary
and on the envelope, and mail it to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex O), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex O),
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before June 3, 2016. You can find more
information, including routine uses
permitted by the Privacy Act, in the
Commission’s privacy policy at https://
www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–04883 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 89
Interstate Compact on Educational
Opportunity for Military Children
Under Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DOD is establishing policies
based on section 539 of Public Law 111–
84 to implement the Interstate Compact
on Educational Opportunity for Military
Children (referred to as the ‘‘Compact’’)
within the DoD. The proposed rule
provides components with policies to
support the intent of the Compact,
which is to aid the transition of schoolage children in military families
between school districts (to include
between Department of Defense
Educational Activity schools and state
school districts). Each state joining the
compact agrees to address specific
school transition issues in a consistent
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Purpose of This Rulemaking
This proposed rule provides
components of the DoD with policies to
support the intent of the Compact,
which is to aid the transition of schoolage children in military families
between school districts. The intent of
the program is to ensure children are
enrolled immediately in their new
school, placed in the appropriate
academic program, and are able to
graduate on time.
Each state joining the compact agrees
to address specific school transition
issues in a consistent way and minimize
school disruptions for military children
transferring from one state school
system to another. The compact consists
of general policies in four key areas:
Eligibility, enrollment, placement and
graduation.
As of August 2014, 50 states have
passed legislation to become members
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the compact, including most of those
with large numbers of military
residents. The Department of Defense
Education Activity cannot be a member
of the compact but is complying with its
provisions in both overseas and
domestic schools. In return, the compact
member states have agreed to treat
students coming from a DoDEA school
as though they were transferring from a
member state. The compact has
provisions for member states to facilitate
enrollment in the following areas:
Enrollment
• Education records. When a family
leaves a school district in a member
state, the parents may receive a set of
unofficial records to carry to the new
school in another member state. It will
include all the information the new
school needs to enroll and place the
child until they receive the official
records. In addition, the compact
requires all sending school districts
within member states to send official
transcripts within 10 days of a request
from the receiving state school district.
• Immunizations. If a child
transferring to a member state needs
additional immunizations, he or she
may enroll and begin school. Parents
then have 30 days to see that the child
gets the required immunizations. If
further immunizations are required,
they must be started within 30 calendar
days of enrollment. Tuberculosis testing
is not covered under the compact since
the TB test is not an immunization but
rather a health screening.
• Kindergarten and first grade
entrance age. If the entrance age
requirement in the new school system is
different, transitioning children may
continue in the same grade if they have
already started kindergarten or first
grade where the family was previously
stationed. This provision also allows
children to move up to first or second
grade, regardless of age requirements, if
they have completed kindergarten or
first grade in another state.
Placement and Attendance
Students from military families often
miss appropriate placement in required
classes, advanced placement and
special-needs programs while awaiting
evaluation at the new school. The
compact requires cooperation in the
following areas:
• Course and education program
placement. A receiving school district
in a member state must initially honor
placement of a student based on his or
her enrollment in the sending state,
provided the new school has a similar
or equivalent program. The receiving
school may evaluate the student after
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
placement to ensure it is appropriate,
but the school may not put children into
‘‘holding classes’’ while they await
assessment. The receiving school may
allow the student to attend similar
education courses in other schools
within the district if the receiving
school does not offer such courses.
• Special education services.
Students covered by the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act receive
the same services (although not
necessarily identical programs)
identified in the individual education
plan from the sending state. This is a
parallel requirement under federal law.
• Placement flexibility. School
districts are encouraged to determine if
course or program prerequisites can be
waived for students who have
completed similar coursework in the
sending school district. This process
allows students to take advanced
courses rather than repeat similar basic
courses.
• Absence related to deployment
activities. Students in member states
may request additional, excused
absences to visit with their parent or
legal guardian immediately before,
during and after deployment. Schools
have flexibility in approving absences if
there are competing circumstances such
as state testing or if the student already
has excessive absences.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Eligibility
The compact asks school districts in
member states to examine their rules for
eligibility to allow children of military
parents to have the continuity they
need.
• Enrollment. When a child of a
deployed parent is staying with a noncustodial parent, a relative or a friend
who is officially acting in place of the
parents and lives outside of the home
school district, the child may continue
to attend his or her own school as long
as the care provider ensures
transportation to school. The compact
also stipulates that a power of attorney
for guardianship is sufficient for
enrollment and all other actions
requiring parental participation or
consent.
• Extracurricular participation. When
children transfer to a new school, their
participation in extracurricular
activities is facilitated—provided
they’re eligible—even if application
deadlines and tryouts have passed.
Schools must make reasonable
accommodations but are not required to
hold spaces open for military-related
transferees.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
Graduation
School transitions can be especially
challenging for high school students.
The compact requires school districts to
make the following accommodations to
facilitate on-time graduation:
• Course waivers. School districts in
member states may waive courses
required for graduation if similar
coursework has been completed in
another school. Such waivers are not
mandatory under the compact, but a
school district must show reasonable
justification to deny a waiver.
• Exit exams. Under the compact, a
school district may accept the sending
state’s exit exams, achievement tests or
other tests required for graduation
instead of requiring the student to meet
the testing requirements of the receiving
state. States have flexibility to
determine what tests they will accept or
require the student to take.
• Transfers during senior year. If a
student moves during the senior year
and the receiving state is unable to make
the necessary accommodations for
required courses and exit exams, the
two school districts must work together
to obtain a diploma from the sending
school so the student can graduate on
time.
The compact does not address the
quality of education or require a state to
change any of its standards or education
criteria. The Military Interstate
Children’s Compact Commission (MIC3)
has created a variety of downloadable
brochures, webinars and other resources
to help parents and educators learn
more about the Compact—See more at:
https://www.mic3.net.
If a family has a concern about a
provision of the compact as it relates to
a child, it’s best to contact the school
first. Each installation has a school
liaison to help work with schools to get
questions answered or to provide
information on next steps to take if
concerns cannot be successfully
resolved.
II. Narrative Description of Legal
Authorities for This Rule
The legal authorities for this rule
clarify the definition of children in
military families covered by this rule,
cover the protections afforded these
children, and provide the authority for
establishing the policies included in
this rule for the DoD Education Activity:
(1) 10 U.S. Code 2164—Department of
Defense Domestic Dependent
Elementary and Secondary Schools.
This citation states the Secretary of
Defense may issue directives that the
Secretary considers necessary for the
effective operation of the school or the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11699
entire school system, outside of the
authority given to the School Boards
selected to oversee these schools.
(2) 20 U.S. Code—Education, Chapter
25A—Overseas Defense Dependents’
Education § 921—Defense Dependents’
Education System, and § 932—
Definitions. This citation provides the
scope of the authority of the Secretary
of Defense to define programs and
activities to provide a free public
education through secondary school for
dependents in overseas areas.
III. Summary of the Major Focus Points
of This Rulemaking
The major provisions of this
regulatory action include designating
DoD liaisons to State Councils of
member states of the Compact,
designating the DoD ex-officio member
to the Compact Commission,
implementing the relevant school
transition policies established in the
Compact within the DoDEA school
system, and establishing a committee
within DoDEA to advise on compliance
by DoDEA school.
(1) As required by the Compact, states
establish Councils to oversee the
implementation of the Compact within
the state. The Compact prescribes
membership of the State Council, which
may include a representative from the
military community within the state.
Since this individual represents the
interests of the military community to
the State Council, the military
representative can only fulfill a liaison
role on the Council and must be
designated by DoD. This rule defines the
role for the military representative
(§ 89.7(a)), along with the process
(§ 89.7(b)) for coordinating the requests
from State Commissioners and
designating these military
representatives.
(2) The Compact allows DoD to send
an ex-officio representative to the
Commission meetings, and also requires
the DoD ex-officio representative to
participate on the Executive Committee
of the Commission. This rule provides
guidelines for the DoD ex-officio
representative (§ 89.7(d)).
(3) This rule establishes policies for
DoDEA governing the transition of
school age children in military families
(§ 89.8 of this rule), which are
equivalent to the following policies
included in the Compact: Article IV—
records and enrollment, Article V—
placement and attendance, Article VI—
eligibility for enrollment, and Article
VII—graduation.
(4) This rule establishes a committee
to advise DoDEA on compliance with
provisions in § 89.8. The DoDEA
Committee also provides input to the
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
11700
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ex-officio member of the Commission on
issues arising from DoDEA school
interactions with member States of the
Compact, and acts as a counterpart to
State Councils of member States.
Policies for assigning a representative
from the Military Departments to this
committee are included in § 89.7(c).
IV. Cost and Benefit Analysis
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
There are no provisions in this
proposed rule which are expected to
increase costs for members of the
public. Requirements included in this
rule may require action to be taken by
state education departments and local
education agencies as a result of
requirements of the state laws.
The cost to the Department are
summarized below:
• (Military representative attending
State Council meetings. State Council
meetings are generally held at a central
location for the state, and are expected
to be held at least once per year. The
military representative would be
required, while on duty and at
government expense, to travel to and
attend the meeting. A meeting would be
expected to demand an average of 1.5
days (travel and meeting time), which
would cost an approximate average of
$564 1 in opportunity labor cost.
Additionally, intrastate travel and per
diem is expected to cost an approximate
average of $334.2 States vary with
regards to the number of military
representatives they have requested to
attend; however, the estimated number
of military representatives is 77.3
Applying the approximate average costs
per year provides $43,430 in
opportunity labor costs and $25,720 in
travel and per diem.
• Identifying, nominating and
designating a military representative.
DOD estimates approximately 76 hours 4
of administrative time to coordinate
nominations per year, plus
1 Cost estimated on the salary of a GS–14 step 5
without locality pay or percentage for benefits
(average of $47 per hour) times approximately 12
hours.
2 Cost of travel calculated at an average round trip
requiring 300 miles times the 2015 mileage rate of
$0.575 per mile (equals approximately $172), plus
per diem costs of $129 per day (national estimate),
plus proportional meals and incidentals for the
second day of $33 ($162).
3 Estimated number of total military
representatives for the 50 member states and the
District of Columbia, based on the average of
number currently designated in states with military
representatives (41 reps in 27 states).
4 Estimate 3 hours of staff time to receive the
request; relay the requirement to the designated
Military Department and obtain approval; and
provide the name to the Office of Secretary of
Defense. Anticipate having to replace half of the
military representatives each year (38).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
approximately 76 hours 5 to process,
review, coordinate, sign and distribute
the designation letters. The opportunity
labor cost of coordination would be
approximately $4,560 6 and completing
the designation letter, with
accompanying documents, would be
$4,400 7 per year.
• Ex-officio representation to the
Military Interstate Child Compact
Commission (MIC3). This individual
participates in the annual conference,
executive committee meeting and other
standing committee meetings and would
cost DOD approximately $8,460 per
year.8
Additionally, this proposed rule will
direct DoDEA to transition children
under specific policies. These are the
same policies that are included in the
Compact, Articles IV–VII, which have
been shown to be cost-neutral (and
perhaps a cost-benefit) when
implemented by local education
agencies within the states that are
members of the Compact.9 Essentially,
schools are responsible for transitioning
children, and the proposed rules, based
upon the transition policies included in
the Compact, provide a consistent
approach that schools apply in member
states to the Compact. Hence, there is
less variability and uncertainty in the
process. Applying these policies within
DoDEA is expected to produce similar
results, since these policies would apply
to all children within the DoDEA school
system (therefore applying a consistent
policy regardless of the child), and
many of these proposed policies
represent the existing procedures used
in DoDEA schools to transition students.
The DoD committee to oversee the
implementation of this rule within
DoDEA is expected to cost
5 Estimate 2 hours of staff time to prepare the
letter of designation and accompanying documents
and obtain a signature from the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Military Community and
Family Policy. Anticipate processing 38 letters of
designation per year.
6 Cost estimated on the salary of a GS–13 step 5,
without locality pay or percentage for benefits
(average of $40 per hour).
7 Cost estimated on the salary of a GS–14 step 5
with locality pay for Washington DC, but no
percentage for benefits (average of $58 per hour).
8 Cost estimated on three trips per year, each
involving 3 days, at a location outside of
Washington DC. The labor cost is estimated on the
salary of a GS–15 step 5 with locality pay for
Washington DC (no benefits included) time 72
hours ($4,900), plus $3,560 for travel and per diem.
9 Analysis accomplished by states as part of their
legislative process showed that the provisions of the
Compact supporting the transition of military
children were fiscally neutral. Transition occurs
regardless of having an organized process, and the
provisions of the Compact were considered as
providing consistent expectations and
administrative procedures capable of reducing the
cost of administering transition for military
children.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
approximately $3,250 per year 10 to
administer and conduct meetings.
The benefits derived from DoD’s
participation in the Compact accrue to
Service members and their families,
particularly the 707,000 school-age
children educated by local education
agencies and DoDEA.11 These benefits
have not necessarily been quantified,
but can be described in qualitative
terms. Military moves are stressful for
the entire family, and transitioning to a
new school creates stresses because of
uncertainty. Military children are
confronted with unknown academic and
social challenges, and their parents
must overcome new administrative
requirements to enroll them. The
provisions included in the Compact
provide relief for some of the
administrative requirements faced by
parents and the academic issues
regularly experienced by military
children who generally attend six-tonine different schools between
kindergarten and 12th grade.12 The goal
of the Compact is to replace the widely
varying treatment of transitioning
military students with a comprehensive
approach that provides a uniform policy
in every school district in every state
that chooses to join. Through more
uniform transition policies, military
children have an opportunity to
assimilate into their classes, extracurricular activities and new social
circles more quickly. Additionally the
Compact recognizes the difficulties
military children may have with being
separated from a parent due to a
military deployment, allowing for
liberal absences for children to be with
the deploying/returning parents.
The Compact Articles IV–VII were
developed as a result of input from 17
representative national and state
stakeholders who were asked to
participate in a working group
sponsored by the Council of State
Governments, National Center for
Interstate Compacts.13 The majority of
10 Estimated on two meetings (each two hours in
length) per year, attended by 12 people with an
average salary of a GS–14 step 5, with Washington
DC locality pay (not including benefits); plus 8
hours of preparation time for the two meetings by
a GS–14 step 5, with Washington DC locality pay.
11 2013 Demographic Profile of the Military
Community, DMDC Active Duty Military Family
File (September 2013), page 132.
12 Council of State Governments, ‘‘Interstate
Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military
Children Legislative Resource Kit,’’ January 2008,
page 1.
13 Contributing individuals and groups included:
National Association of Elementary School
Principals; National Military Family Association;
Military Child Education Coalition; U.S.
Department of Education; National School Boards
Association; National PTA; Office of Lt Governor
Beverly Purdue, NC; Alabama State Senator;
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
their recommendations came from work
that had previously been presented in
studies, such as the Military Child
Education Coalition’s Secondary
Education Transition Study, conducted
for the U.S. Army in 2001, and the
subsequent Memoranda of Agreement
signed by nine school districts which
addressed ‘‘the timely transfer of
records, systems to ease student
transition during the first 2 weeks of
enrollment, practices that foster access
to extracurricular programs, procedures
to lessen the adverse impact of moves of
juniors and seniors, [and] variations in
school calendars and schedules,’’ among
other recommendations.14
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Sec. 202, Pub. L. 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4) requires agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates
require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2014, that
threshold is approximately $141
million. This rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or tribal
National School Superintendents Association
(Local School Superintendent); National Education
Association; Military Impacted Schools
Association; Maryland Department of Education;
Ofc of the Under Secretary of Defense; California
Department of Education; Nevada State Senator;
and the Florida Department of Education;
Education Commission of the States.
14 Kathleen F. Berg, ‘‘Easing Transitions of
Military Dependents into Hawaii Public Schools: An
Invitational Education Link,’’ Journal of Invitational
Theory and Practice Volume 14, 2008, page 44.
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
(referred to in this part as the
‘‘Compact’’) within the DoD.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
§ 89.2
The Department of Defense certifies
that this rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601)
because it would not, if promulgated,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, as amended, does not require us to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not impose reporting
and record keeping requirements under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This rule has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action, although not economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
governments, nor will it affect private
sector costs.
11701
This rule was analyzed in accordance
with the principles and criteria
contained in Executive Order 13132
(‘‘Federalism’’). It has been determined
that it does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary
impact statement. This rule has no
substantial effect on the States, or on the
current Federal-State relationship, or on
the current distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various local
officials. Nothing in this rule preempts
any State law or regulation. Therefore,
DoD did not consult with State and
local officials because it was not
necessary.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 89
Children, Education, Interstate
compact.
Accordingly 32 CFR part 89 is
proposed to be added to read as follows:
PART 89—INTERSTATE COMPACT ON
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
MILITARY CHILDREN
Sec.
89.1
89.2
89.3
89.4
89.5
89.6
89.7
Purpose.
Applicability.
Definitions.
Policy.
Responsibilities.
Procedures.
Representatives to State Councils, the
DoDEA Committee and MIC3.
89.8 Compact provisions.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2164, 20 U.S.C. 921–
932.
§ 89.1
Purpose.
In accordance with section 539 of
Public Law 111–84, this part establishes
policy, assigns responsibilities, and
provides procedures to implement the
Interstate Compact on Educational
Opportunity for Military Children
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Applicability.
This part applies to the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, the Military
Departments, the Office of the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint
Staff, the Combatant Commands, the
Office of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense, the Defense
Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and
all other organizational entities within
the DoD.
§ 89.3
Definitions.
These terms and their definitions are
for the purposes of this part.
504 plan. A plan required pursuant to
29 U.S.C. 794 specifying the
modifications and accommodations for
a child with a disability to meet the
individual educational needs of that
child as adequately as the needs of
children without disabilities are met.
The plans can include accommodations
such as wheelchair ramps, blood sugar
monitoring, an extra set of textbooks, a
peanut-free lunch environment, home
instruction, or a tape recorder or
keyboard for taking notes.
Children of military families. Schoolaged children who are enrolled in
kindergarten through twelfth grade and
are in the households of Service
members who:
(1) Are on active duty, including
members of the National Guard and
Reserve on active duty orders pursuant
to 10 U.S.C. 1211;
(2) Are active duty or veterans who
are severely wounded, ill, or injured; or
(3) Die on active duty or as a result
of injuries sustained on active duty.
(4) Children of military members who
are severely wounded, ill, or injured
retain this designation for 1 year after
discharge or retirement. Children of
military members who die on active
duty or as a result of injuries sustained
on active duty, retain this designation
for 1 year after death.
Deployment. The period 1 month
prior to the military members’ departure
from their home station on military
orders through 6 months after return to
their home station.
Department of Defense Education
Activity (DoDEA) Committee. A DoD
committee established pursuant to this
part by Director of DoDEA to advise
DoDEA on compliance with provisions
in § 89.8 by DoDEA schools. The DoDEA
Committee also provides input to the
ex-officio member of the Commission on
issues arising from DoDEA school
interactions with member States of the
Compact, and acts as a counterpart to
State Councils of member States.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11702
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Education records. Those official
records, files, and data directly related
to a child and maintained by the school
or local educational agency (LEA) or
state educational agency (SEA),
including but not limited to, records
encompassing all the material kept in
the child’s cumulative folder such as
general identifying data, records of
attendance and of academic work
completed, records of achievement and
results of evaluative tests, health data,
disciplinary status, test protocols, and
individualized education programs
(IEPs).
Ex-officio member of the Commission.
Non-voting member of the Commission
who may include, but not be limited to,
members of the representative
organizations of military family
advocates, LEA officials, parent and
teacher groups, the DoD, the Education
Commission of the State, the Interstate
Agreement on the Qualification of
Educational Personnel, and other
interstate compacts affecting the
education of children of military
members.
Extracurricular activity. A voluntary
activity sponsored by the school or LEA
or SEA or an organization sanctioned by
the LEA or SEA. Extracurricular
activities include but are not limited to
preparation for and involvement in
public performances, contests, athletic
competitions, demonstrations, displays,
and club activities.
IEP. When a child is identified as a
child with disabilities in accordance
with Individuals With Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), he or she must
have a written document that describes
the special education supports and
services the child will receive. The IEP
is developed by a team that includes the
child’s parents and school staff.
Interstate Compact on Education
Opportunity for Military Children (the
Compact). An agreement approved
through State legislation that requires
member States to follow provisions
supporting the transition of children of
military families between school
systems in member States. As part of
joining the Compact, States agree to
participate in the Commission and pay
dues to the Commission to support its
oversight of the Compact.
LEA. A public authority legally
constituted by the State as an
administrative agency to provide control
of and direction for kindergarten
through twelfth grade public
educational institutions. For the
purpose of administering the provisions
of the Compact in § 89.8 of this part,
DoDEA school districts as defined in 20
U.S.C. 932 are equivalent to an LEA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
Member State. A State that has
enacted the Compact.
Military Interstate Children’s Compact
Commission (MIC3). The MIC3, also
known as the Interstate Commission on
Educational Opportunity for Military
Children (sometimes referred to as the
‘‘Interstate Commission’’ or ‘‘the
Commission’’), is the governing body of
the Compact composed of
representatives from each member State,
as well as various ex-officio members.
The Commission provides general
oversight of the agreement, creates and
enforces rules governing the Compact,
and promotes training and compliance
with the Compact. Each member State
will be allowed one vote on Compact
matters, and the Commission will
provide the venue for solving interstate
issues and disputes.
Military Family Education Liaison.
Individual appointed or designated by
State Council of each member state to
assist military families and the State in
facilitating the implementation of the
Compact. Military members and DoD
civilian employees cannot perform this
function.
Military installation. A base, camp,
post, station, yard, center, homeport
facility for any ship, or other activity
under DoD jurisdiction, including any
leased facility. (This term does not
include any facility used primarily for
civil works, rivers and harbors projects,
or flood control projects.)
Military representative to a State
Council. Individual designated by the
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Military Community and Family
Policy (DASD(MC&FP)) to perform the
duties and responsibilities defined in
§ 89.5 of this part. The military
representative is responsible for
representing the interest of the DoD in
fostering easier transition of children of
military families according to their
designation (installation representative,
Military Department representative or
statewide representative). The military
representative will be a military member
or DoD civilian who can remain in the
position for at least 2 years and who has
a direct interface with the State
education system as part of official
duties or has supervisory responsibility
for those who do.
Military representative to the DoDEA
Committee. Individual nominated to
represent all four Services by the Office
of the Assistant Secretary of the Army
for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
(OASA(M&RA)), Office of the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy for Manpower and
Reserve Affairs (OASN(M&RA)), or
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the
Air Force for Manpower and Reserve
Affairs (OASAF(M&RA)) on a rotational
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
basis and appointed by the
DASD(MC&FP) for a 2-year term.
Because DoDEA is a DoD Component
the military representative may act as a
full participant in the DoDEA
Committee.
Receiving State. The State to which a
child of a military family is sent,
brought, or caused to be sent or brought.
SEA. A public authority similar to an
LEA, legally constituted by the State as
an administrative agency to provide
control of and direction for kindergarten
through twelfth grade public
educational institutions for the entire
State.
Sending State. The State from which
a child of a military family is sent,
brought, or caused to be sent or brought.
State. State of the United States, the
District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa,
the Northern Marianas Islands and any
other U.S. territory or possession. For
purposes of administering the
provisions of the Compact in § 89.8 of
this part, DoD is considered a State and
DoDEA is considered the equivalent of
a State department of education for
DoD.
State Council. A body that
coordinates among government
agencies, LEAs, and military
installations concerning the member
State’s participation in and compliance
with the Compact and the Commission
activities. A member State may
determine the membership of its own
Council, but membership must include
at least: The State superintendent of
education; superintendent of a school
district with a high concentration of
military children; representative (as a
liaison) from a military installation; one
representative each from the legislative
and executive branches of State
government; and other offices and
stakeholder groups the State Council
deems appropriate.
Transition.
(1) The formal and physical process of
transferring from school to school; or
(2) The period of time in which a
child moves from a school in the
sending State to a school in the
receiving State.
Veteran. A person who served in the
military and who was discharged or
released from the military under
conditions other than dishonorable.
§ 89.4
Policy.
In accordance with Section 539 of
Public Law 111–84, ‘‘National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010’’
and DoD 5500.07–R, ‘‘Joint Ethics
Regulations (JER)’’ (available at https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
550007r.pdf), it is DoD policy to support
the intent of the Compact by reducing
the difficulty children of military
families (referred to in this part as
‘‘children’’ or ‘‘the child’’) have in
transferring between school systems
because of frequent moves and
deployment of their parents. DoD will
support the Compact by:
(a) Designating military liaisons to
State Councils of member States, the
DoDEA Committee, and the MIC3.
(b) Implementing the intent of the
Compact in the DoDEA to ensure:
(1) Timely enrollment of children in
school so they are not penalized due to:
(i) Late or delayed transfers of
educational records from the previous
school district(s); or
(ii) Differences in entrance or age
requirements.
(2) Placement of children in
educational courses and programs,
including special educational services,
so they are not penalized due to
differences in attendance requirements,
scheduling, sequencing, grading, or
course content.
(3) Flexible qualification and
eligibility of children so they can have
an equitable chance at participation in
extracurricular, academic, athletic, and
social activities.
(4) Graduation within the same
timeframe as the children’s peers.
(c) Promoting through DoDEA and the
Military Departments:
(1) Flexibility and cooperation among
SEAs or LEAs, DoDEA, Military
Departments, parents, and children to
achieve educational success.
(2) Coordination among the various
State agencies, LEAs, and military
installations regarding the State’s
participation in the Compact.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 89.5
Responsibilities.
(a) Under the authority, direction, and
control of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness
(USD(P&R)), the Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Manpower and Reserve
Affairs (ASD(M&RA)) oversees the
implementation of this part.
(b) Under the authority, direction, and
control of the ASD (M&RA), the
DASD(MC&FP):
(1) Designates military representatives
as liaisons to State councils, nominated
by the Secretaries of the Military
Departments by the procedures outlined
in § 89.7 of this part.
(2) Designates the DoD ex-officio
member of MIC3, insofar as DoD is
invited to do so by MIC3.
(3) Maintains a roster of designated
liaisons to State councils in accordance
with 32 CFR part 310.
(4) Monitors issues arising under the
Compact:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
(i) Affecting children of military
families attending and transferring
between member State schools; and
(ii) the implementation of § 89.8 of
this part, affecting children of military
families transferring between member
state schools and DoDEA’s schools
(consisting of the Department of Defense
Schools (DoDDS)—Europe, DoDDS—
Pacific, and the Domestic Dependent
Elementary and Secondary Schools
(DDESS)).
(c) Under the authority, direction, and
control of ASD (M&RA), the Director,
DoDEA:
(1) To the extent allowable by 10
U.S.C. 2164 and 20 U.S.C. 921–932,
adjusts operating policies and
procedures issued pursuant to DoD
Directive 1342.20, ‘‘Department of
Defense Education Activity (DoDEA)’’
(available at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/
directives/corres/pdf/134220p.pdf) to
implement the provisions of the
Compact described in § 89.8 of this part.
(2) Informs boards and councils,
described in DoD Instruction 1342.15,
‘‘Educational Advisory Committees and
Councils’’ (available at https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
134215p.pdf) and DoD Instruction
1342.25, ‘‘School Boards for Department
of Defense Domestic Dependent
Elementary and Secondary Schools
(DDESS)’’ (available at https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/
134225p.pdf), of the Compact
provisions in § 89.8 of this part and the
DoDEA administration of these
provisions.
(3) Addresses disputes over
provisions in § 89.8 of this part between
member States and DoDEA. When
differences cannot be resolved with a
member State, works with MIC3 to
resolve these disputes.
(4) Establishes the DoDEA Committee
to review compliance with the
provisions in § 89.8 of this part and to
address issues raised by the Secretaries
of the Military Departments concerning
the implementation of these provisions.
(5) Ensures all personally identifiable
information (PII) is collected,
maintained, disseminated, and used in
accordance with 32 CFR part 310.
(6) Ensures that DoDEA schools
comply with § 89.8 and that DoDEA
school-level officials inform DoDEA
students transferring to schools in
member States of the benefits extended
by receiving States under the Compact.
(d) The Secretaries of the Military
Departments:
(1) Nominate military representatives,
in accordance with the procedures
outlined in § 89.7 of this part, for
designation as liaisons to State Councils
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11703
by the DASD(MC&FP) when such DoD
liaison is requested.
(2) Establish departmental policies
and procedures to inform military
communities of:
(i) The provisions of this part as it
affects children of military families
attending and transferring between
member State schools; and
(ii) the provisions in § 89.8 of this part
concerning students transferring
between DoDEA and member State
schools.
(3) Procedures to resolve issues or
challenges raised by parents concerning
the provisions of § 89.8 of this part.
§ 89.6
Procedures.
DoD implements policy in this part
by:
(a) Establishing a committee within
DoDEA (referred to in this part as the
‘‘DoDEA Committee’’).
(b) Designating military
representatives to the State Councils of
the member States and the DoDEA
Committee in accordance with
procedures in § 89.7.
(c) Designating the ex-officio member
to MIC3 in accordance with § 89.5 and
§ 89.7.
(d) Ensuring DoDEA compliance with
the selected provisions of the Compact
described in § 89.8.
§ 89.7 Representatives to State Councils,
the DoDEA Committee and MIC3.
(a) Military Representatives as
Liaisons to State Councils. In
accordance with section 3–201 of DoD
5500.07–R, military representatives to
State Councils will:
(1) Be a military member or a civilian
employee of DoD who has a direct
interface with the State education
system as part of official duties or has
supervisory responsibility for those who
do.
(2) Only represent DoD interests (not
the interests of the State Council), and
consequently may not:
(i) Engage in management or control
of the State Council (therefore, may not
vote or make decisions on daily
administration of council);
(ii) Endorse or allow the appearance
of DoD endorsement of the State
Council or its events, products, services,
or enterprises;
(iii) Represent the State Council to
third parties; or
(iv) Represent the State Council to the
U.S. Government, as prohibited by
federal criminal statutes.
(3) Make clear to the State Council
that:
(i) The opinions expressed by the
representative do not bind DoD or any
DoD Component to any action.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
11704
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(ii) If included on State Council Web
sites, all references to the representative
by name or title must indicate that they
are the ‘‘Military Representative’’ as
opposed to a council member.
(4) Notify the chain of command of
issues requiring policy decisions or
actions requested of the military
community within the State.
(5) When called upon to act as the
spokesperson for one or more than one
installation:
(i) Get feedback from the designated
points of contact at each military
installation within his or her
responsibility.
(ii) Coordinate proposed input to the
State Council with the appropriate
points of contact for each military
installation within his or her
responsibility.
(iii) Act as a conduit for information
between the State Council and each
military installation within his or her
responsibility.
(iv) Provide feedback through the
chain of command to the points of
contact for each military installation
within his or her responsibility and, as
appropriate, to the OASA(M&RA), the
OASN(M&RA), or the OASAF(M&RA).
(6) Notify the State Council and the
appropriate Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Military Department listed in
paragraph (a)(5)(iv) of this section,
through the chain of command, of
reassignment or other circumstances
that would require a replacement.
(b) Nomination Process for Military
Representatives to State Councils.
(1) In accordance with DoD 5500.07–
R, military representatives are
nominated by the Military Departments
and designated by the DASD(MC&FP),
not by State officials. Depending on the
number of military representatives
required by State statute, designating
representatives to a State Council will
be accomplished according to the
processes outlined in Table 1:
TABLE 1—PROCESS FOR DESIGNATING MILITARY REPRESENTATIVES TO STATE COUNCILS
If State statute concerning military
representatives provides for:
The State Commissioner
contacts:
Who requests a selection be made by:
One representative for all military children
in the State.
DASD(MC&FP) ..................
One representative for each Military Service.
One representative for each military installation in the State.
DASD(MC&FP) ..................
OASA(M&RA),
OASN(M&RA),
or
OASAF(M&RA) responsible for providing a representative for the State
listed in Table 2.
OASA(M&RA),
OASN(M&RA),
and
OASAF(M&RA).
OASA(M&RA),
OASN(M&RA)
and
OASAF(M&RA).
DASD(MC&FP) ..................
(2) When there is more than one
military representative to a State
Council (e.g., one per installation or one
per Military Department represented in
the State), the individual appointed by
the responsible Military Department
(Table 2) will serve as the lead military
representative when DoD must speak
with a single voice.
(3) In circumstances where the State
requests an individual by name, the
DASD(MC&FP) will forward the request
to the individual’s Military Department
for consideration. If that Military
Department is different from the one
designated in Table 2, the
DASD(MC&FP) will first obtain the
concurrence of the responsible Military
Department.
(4) Military representatives are
expected to serve a minimum of 2 years.
When notified by the incumbent
Whereupon the official
written designation is
made by:
DASD(MC&FP).
DASD(MC&FP).
DASD(MC&FP).
military representative of the need for a
replacement, the OASA(M&RA),
OASN(M&RA), or OASAF(M&RA) will
inform DASD(MC&FP) of the request.
(5) In accordance with the Compact,
State officials appoint or designate the
Military Family Education Liaison for
the State. Service members and DoD
civilians cannot be appointed or
designated to fill this position for the
State.
TABLE 2—MILITARY DEPARTMENT AREAS OF AUTHORITY FOR SELECTING A SINGLE MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
STATE COUNCIL
Military
Department
Areas of authority
Army .................
Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin.
American Samoa, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Guam, Maine, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North
Carolina, Northern Marianas, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Virginia, Virgin Islands.
Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North
Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming.
Navy .................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Air Force ...........
(c) Military Representative to the
DoDEA Committee. Membership of the
DoDEA Committee will include a
representative from one of the Military
Services to represent all four Services.
OASA(M&RA), OASN(M&RA), or
OASAF(M&RA) will nominate a
representative on a rotational basis who
will be designated for a 2-year term by
the DASD(MC&FP).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
(d) Ex-Officio Member to MIC3. In
accordance with section 3–201 of DoD
5500.07–R, the DoD ex-officio member
to the Commission must:
(1) Be a military member or a civilian
employee of DoD who can remain in the
position for at least 2 years and who has
a direct interface with DoDEA and the
U.S. public education system as part of
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
official duties or has supervisory
responsibility for those who do.
(2) Attend as a liaison meetings of
MIC3, its Executive Committee, and
other standing committees where
requested by the Commission.
(3) Only represent DoD interests (not
the interests of MIC3), and consequently
may not:
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(i) Engage in management or control
of MIC3 (therefore, may not vote or
make decisions on daily administration
of MIC3);
(ii) Endorse or allow the appearance
of DoD endorsement of MIC3, or its
events, products, services, or
enterprises;
(iii) Represent the Commission to
third parties; or
(iv) Represent MIC3 to the U.S.
Government, as prohibited by criminal
statutes.
(4) Make clear to MIC3 that:
(i) The opinions expressed by the
incumbent do not bind DoD or any DoD
Component to any action.
(ii) If included on MIC3 Web sites, all
references to the incumbent by name or
title must indicate that they are the
‘‘DoD Ex-Officio Member’’ as opposed to
a MIC3 member.
(5) Notify the chain of command of
issues requiring policy decisions or
actions requested of DoD.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 89.8
Compact provisions.
(a) DoDEA Area School Districts
Relationship With SEAs or LEAs in
Member States.
(1) For the purposes of DoD’s
implementation of the Compact in the
schools it operates, DoDEA’s area offices
(Department of Defense Dependent
Schools—Europe, Department of
Defense Dependent Schools—Pacific,
and the Domestic Dependent
Elementary and Secondary Schools) and
their schools are considered as the
equivalent of LEAs and SEAs,
respectively.
(2) Each DoDEA area acts as the
‘‘receiving LEA’’ and ‘‘sending LEA’’ in
working with LEAs or SEAs in member
States.
(b) Articles IV Through VII of the
Compact. This section describes the
specific duties that DoDEA’s LEAs have
as ‘‘sending’’ or ‘‘receiving’’ LEAs.
DoDEA’s duties under this section will
reciprocate the duties assumed by
member State LEAs or SEAs to children
of military families, as expressed by
their respective State’s implementation
of the Compact Articles IV through VII.
DoDEA will implement the provisions
described below, which, while retaining
the intent of the Compact, have been
modified as needed in the DoDEA
context.
(1) Article IV: Education Records and
Enrollment
(i) Unofficial or ‘‘Hand-Carried’’
Education Records
(A) If official education records
cannot be released to the parents for
transfer, the DoDEA custodian of the
records, as the sending LEA shall
provide to the parent a complete set of
unofficial education records.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
(B) Upon receipt of the unofficial
education records, the DoDEA school, as
the school in the receiving LEA shall
enroll and appropriately place the child
as quickly as possible based on the
information in the unofficial records,
pending validation by the official
records.
(ii) Official Education Records or
Transcripts
(A) The DoDEA school, acting as the
receiving LEA shall request the child’s
official education record from the
school in the sending State at the same
time as DoDEA school enrolls and
conditionally places the child.
(B) Upon receipt of the request for a
child’s records, the school in DoDEA,
acting as the sending LEA will provide
the child’s official education records to
the school in the receiving State, within
10 work days. If there is a designated
school staff break, records will be
provided as soon as possible; however,
the time will not exceed 10 work days
after the return of staff. DoDEA will
initiate actions to meet these deadlines
without violating the disclosure rules of
the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
(iii) Immunizations
(A) Parents have 30 days from the
date of enrolling their child in a DoDEA
school to have their child(ren)
immunized in accordance with
DoDEA’s immunization requirements,
as the receiving LEA.
(B) For a series of immunizations,
parents must begin initial vaccinations
of their child(ren) within 30 days.
(iv) Entrance Age
(A) At the time of transition and
regardless of the age of the child, the
DoDEA school, acting as the receiving
LEA, shall enroll the transitioning childat the -grade level—as the child’s grade
level (i.e. in kindergarten through grade
12) in the sending state’s LEA.
(B) A child who has satisfactorily
completed the prerequisite grade level
in the sending state’s LEA will be
eligible for enrollment in the next
higher grade level in DoDEA school,
acting as the receiving LEA, regardless
of the child’s age.
(C) To be admitted to a school in the
receiving State, the parent or guardian
of a child transferring from a DoDEA
(sending) LEA must provide:
(1) Official military orders showing
the military member or the member’s
spouse was assigned to the sending
State or commuting area of the State in
which the child was previously
enrolled. If the child was residing with
a guardian other than the military
member during the previous enrollment,
proof of guardianship (as specified in
the Compact) should be provided by the
parent or guardian to the receiving LEA
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11705
or SEA to establish eligibility under the
Compact.
(2) An official letter or transcript from
the sending school authority that shows
the student’s record of attendance,
academic information, and grade
placement.
(3) Evidence of immunization against
communicable diseases.
(4) Evidence of date of birth.
(2) Article V: Placement and
Attendance
(i) Course Placement
(A) As long as the course is offered by
DoDEA, as the receiving LEA, it shall
honor placement of a transfer student in
courses based on the child’s placement
or educational assessment in the
sending State school.
(B) Course placement includes, but is
not limited to, Honors, International
Baccalaureate, Advanced Placement,
vocational, technical, and career
pathways courses.
(C) Continuing the child’s academic
program from the previous school and
promoting placement in academically
and career challenging courses shall be
a primary consideration when DoDEA
considers the placement of a
transferring child.
(D) DoDEA, acting as the receiving
LEA, may perform subsequent
evaluations to ensure the child’s
appropriate course placement.
(ii) Educational Program Placement
(A) As long as the program is offered
by DoDEA, acting as a receiving LEA, it
will honor placement of the child in
educational programs based on current
educational assessments and placement
in like programs in the sending State.
Such programs include, but are not
limited to, gifted and talented programs
and English language learners.
(B) The receiving State school may
perform subsequent evaluations to
ensure the child’s appropriate
educational program placement.
(iii) Special Education Services
(A) DoDEA, acting as the receiving
LEA, will initially provide comparable
services to a child with disabilities
based on his or her current IEP in
compliance with 20 U.S.C. chapter 33,
also known and referred to in this part
as the ‘‘Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA),’’ as amended,
and the requirements of Executive Order
13160. DoDEA may perform subsequent
evaluations to ensure the child’s
appropriate placement consistent with
IDEA.
(B) DoDEA, acting as the receiving
LEA, will make reasonable
accommodations and modifications to
address the needs of incoming children
with disabilities, in compliance with the
requirements of 29 U.S.C. 794 and E.O.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11706
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
13160, and subject to an existing 504
plan to provide the child with equal
access to education.
(iv) Placement Flexibility. DoDEA’s
administrative officials must have
flexibility in waiving course or program
prerequisites or other preconditions for
placement in courses or programs
offered under the jurisdiction of DoDEA.
(v) Absences Related to Deployment
Activities. A child whose parent or legal
guardian is an active duty Service
member and has been called to duty for,
is on leave from, or has immediately
returned from deployment to a combat
zone or combat support posting, will be
granted additional excused absences
under governing DoDEA rules.
(3) Article VI: Eligibility for
Enrollment
(i) Eligibility in DoDEA Schools.
Eligibility of dependents of military
members is governed by the laws in 10
U.S.C. 2164 and their implementing
regulations. Only children who are
eligible to attend DoDEA schools may
do so, regardless of their transition
status.
(ii) Eligibility for Extracurricular
Participation. DoDEA, acting as the
receiving LEA, will facilitate the
opportunity for transitioning children’s
inclusion in extracurricular activities,
regardless of application deadlines, to
the extent the children are otherwise
qualified.
(4) Article VII: Graduation. To
facilitate the child’s on-time graduation,
DoDEA will incorporate the following
procedures:
(i) Waiver Requirements
(A) DoDEA administrative officials
will waive specific courses required for
graduation if similar course work has
been satisfactorily completed in another
LEA or provide reasonable justification
for denial.
(B) If DoDEA, as a receiving LEA, does
not grant a waiver to a child who would
qualify to graduate from the sending
school, DoDEA will provide an
alternative means of acquiring required
coursework so that graduation may
occur on time.
(C) If DoDEA, as the receiving LEA,
requires a graduation project, volunteer
community service hours, or other
DoDEA specific requirement, DoDEA
may waive those requirements.
(ii) Exit Exams
(A) DoDEA, as a receiving LEA, must:
(1) Accept exit or end-of-course exams
required for graduation from the
sending State.
(2) Accept national norm-referenced
achievement tests.
(3) Provide alternative testing in lieu
of testing requirements for graduation in
the receiving from a DoDEA school.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
(B) If the alternatives in paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section cannot be
accommodated by DoDEA as the
receiving LEA for a child transferring in
his or her senior year, then the
provisions of paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(C) of
this section will apply.
(iii) Transfers During Senior Year
(A) If a child transferring at the
beginning or during his or her senior
year is ineligible to graduate from
DoDEA, as the receiving LEA, after all
alternatives have been considered,
DoDEA will request a diploma from the
sending LEA or SEA. DoDEA will
ensure the receipt of a diploma from the
sending LEA or SEA, if the child meets
the graduation requirements of the
sending LEA or SEA.
(B) If one of the States in question is
not a member of this Compact, DoDEA,
as a receiving state, will use best efforts
to facilitate a transferring child’s ontime graduation in accordance with
paragraphs (b)(1)(iv)(A) and (b)(1)(iv)(B)
of this section.
producing separate proposed rules for
each individual recurring safety zone
and serves to provide notice of the
known recurring safety zones
throughout the year.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–1029 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Petty Officer James
Robinson, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone (502) 779–5347,
email James.C.Robinson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 2, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
I. Table of Abbreviations
[FR Doc. 2016–04970 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–1029]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Coast Guard Sector
Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring
Safety Zones Update
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
amend and update its list of recurring
safety zone regulations that take place in
the Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley area
of responsibility (AOR). This notice
informs the public of regularly
scheduled events that require additional
safety measures through establishing a
safety zone. Through this notice the
current list of recurring safety zones is
proposed to be updated with revisions,
additional events, and removal of events
that no longer take place in Sector Ohio
Valley’s AOR. When these safety zones
are enforced, vessel traffic is restricted
from specified areas. Additionally, this
one proposed rulemaking project
reduces administrative costs involved in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The legal basis for the rule is 33
U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define regulatory safety zones.
The Captain of the Port (COTP) Ohio
Valley is proposing to establish, amend,
and update its current list of recurring
safety zone regulations.
These safety zones are proposed to be
added, amended, and updated to the list
of annually recurring safety zones under
33 CFR 165.801 in Table no. 1 for
annual safety zones in the COTP Ohio
Valley zone. The Coast Guard will
address all comments accordingly,
whether through response, additional
revision to the regulation, or otherwise.
Additionally, these recurring events are
provided to the public through local
avenues and planned by the local
communities.
The current list of annual and
recurring safety zones occurring in
Sector Ohio Valley’s AOR is published
under 33 CFR part 165.801. That most
recent list was created August 18, 2015
through the rulemaking 80 FR 49911,
which finalized the interim rule
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11698-11706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04970]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 89
[Docket ID: DOD-2014-OS-0020]
RIN 0790-AJ33
Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military
Children
AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DOD is establishing policies based on section 539 of Public
Law 111-84 to implement the Interstate Compact on Educational
Opportunity for Military Children (referred to as the ``Compact'')
within the DoD. The proposed rule provides components with policies to
support the intent of the Compact, which is to aid the transition of
school-age children in military families between school districts (to
include between Department of Defense Educational Activity schools and
state school districts). Each state joining the compact agrees to
address specific school transition issues in a consistent way and
minimize school disruptions for military children transferring from one
state school system to another. The compact consists of general
policies in four key areas: Eligibility, enrollment, placement and
graduation. Children of active duty members of the uniformed services,
National Guard and Reserve on active duty orders, and members or
veterans who are medically discharged or retired for one year are
eligible for assistance under the Compact.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) number and title, by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief
Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, Regulatory
and Audit Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
9010.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcus Beauregard, 571-372-5357.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
I. Purpose of This Rulemaking
This proposed rule provides components of the DoD with policies to
support the intent of the Compact, which is to aid the transition of
school-age children in military families between school districts. The
intent of the program is to ensure children are enrolled immediately in
their new school, placed in the appropriate academic program, and are
able to graduate on time.
Each state joining the compact agrees to address specific school
transition issues in a consistent way and minimize school disruptions
for military children transferring from one state school system to
another. The compact consists of general policies in four key areas:
Eligibility, enrollment, placement and graduation.
As of August 2014, 50 states have passed legislation to become
members of the compact, including most of those with large numbers of
military residents. The Department of Defense Education Activity cannot
be a member of the compact but is complying with its provisions in both
overseas and domestic schools. In return, the compact member states
have agreed to treat students coming from a DoDEA school as though they
were transferring from a member state. The compact has provisions for
member states to facilitate enrollment in the following areas:
Enrollment
Education records. When a family leaves a school district
in a member state, the parents may receive a set of unofficial records
to carry to the new school in another member state. It will include all
the information the new school needs to enroll and place the child
until they receive the official records. In addition, the compact
requires all sending school districts within member states to send
official transcripts within 10 days of a request from the receiving
state school district.
Immunizations. If a child transferring to a member state
needs additional immunizations, he or she may enroll and begin school.
Parents then have 30 days to see that the child gets the required
immunizations. If further immunizations are required, they must be
started within 30 calendar days of enrollment. Tuberculosis testing is
not covered under the compact since the TB test is not an immunization
but rather a health screening.
Kindergarten and first grade entrance age. If the entrance
age requirement in the new school system is different, transitioning
children may continue in the same grade if they have already started
kindergarten or first grade where the family was previously stationed.
This provision also allows children to move up to first or second
grade, regardless of age requirements, if they have completed
kindergarten or first grade in another state.
Placement and Attendance
Students from military families often miss appropriate placement in
required classes, advanced placement and special-needs programs while
awaiting evaluation at the new school. The compact requires cooperation
in the following areas:
Course and education program placement. A receiving school
district in a member state must initially honor placement of a student
based on his or her enrollment in the sending state, provided the new
school has a similar or equivalent program. The receiving school may
evaluate the student after
[[Page 11699]]
placement to ensure it is appropriate, but the school may not put
children into ``holding classes'' while they await assessment. The
receiving school may allow the student to attend similar education
courses in other schools within the district if the receiving school
does not offer such courses.
Special education services. Students covered by the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act receive the same services
(although not necessarily identical programs) identified in the
individual education plan from the sending state. This is a parallel
requirement under federal law.
Placement flexibility. School districts are encouraged to
determine if course or program prerequisites can be waived for students
who have completed similar coursework in the sending school district.
This process allows students to take advanced courses rather than
repeat similar basic courses.
Absence related to deployment activities. Students in
member states may request additional, excused absences to visit with
their parent or legal guardian immediately before, during and after
deployment. Schools have flexibility in approving absences if there are
competing circumstances such as state testing or if the student already
has excessive absences.
Eligibility
The compact asks school districts in member states to examine their
rules for eligibility to allow children of military parents to have the
continuity they need.
Enrollment. When a child of a deployed parent is staying
with a non-custodial parent, a relative or a friend who is officially
acting in place of the parents and lives outside of the home school
district, the child may continue to attend his or her own school as
long as the care provider ensures transportation to school. The compact
also stipulates that a power of attorney for guardianship is sufficient
for enrollment and all other actions requiring parental participation
or consent.
Extracurricular participation. When children transfer to a
new school, their participation in extracurricular activities is
facilitated--provided they're eligible--even if application deadlines
and tryouts have passed. Schools must make reasonable accommodations
but are not required to hold spaces open for military-related
transferees.
Graduation
School transitions can be especially challenging for high school
students. The compact requires school districts to make the following
accommodations to facilitate on-time graduation:
Course waivers. School districts in member states may
waive courses required for graduation if similar coursework has been
completed in another school. Such waivers are not mandatory under the
compact, but a school district must show reasonable justification to
deny a waiver.
Exit exams. Under the compact, a school district may
accept the sending state's exit exams, achievement tests or other tests
required for graduation instead of requiring the student to meet the
testing requirements of the receiving state. States have flexibility to
determine what tests they will accept or require the student to take.
Transfers during senior year. If a student moves during
the senior year and the receiving state is unable to make the necessary
accommodations for required courses and exit exams, the two school
districts must work together to obtain a diploma from the sending
school so the student can graduate on time.
The compact does not address the quality of education or require a
state to change any of its standards or education criteria. The
Military Interstate Children's Compact Commission (MIC3) has created a
variety of downloadable brochures, webinars and other resources to help
parents and educators learn more about the Compact--See more at: https://www.mic3.net.
If a family has a concern about a provision of the compact as it
relates to a child, it's best to contact the school first. Each
installation has a school liaison to help work with schools to get
questions answered or to provide information on next steps to take if
concerns cannot be successfully resolved.
II. Narrative Description of Legal Authorities for This Rule
The legal authorities for this rule clarify the definition of
children in military families covered by this rule, cover the
protections afforded these children, and provide the authority for
establishing the policies included in this rule for the DoD Education
Activity:
(1) 10 U.S. Code 2164--Department of Defense Domestic Dependent
Elementary and Secondary Schools. This citation states the Secretary of
Defense may issue directives that the Secretary considers necessary for
the effective operation of the school or the entire school system,
outside of the authority given to the School Boards selected to oversee
these schools.
(2) 20 U.S. Code--Education, Chapter 25A--Overseas Defense
Dependents' Education Sec. 921--Defense Dependents' Education System,
and Sec. 932--Definitions. This citation provides the scope of the
authority of the Secretary of Defense to define programs and activities
to provide a free public education through secondary school for
dependents in overseas areas.
III. Summary of the Major Focus Points of [hairsp]This Rulemaking
The major provisions of this regulatory action include designating
DoD liaisons to State Councils of member states of the Compact,
designating the DoD ex-officio member to the Compact Commission,
implementing the relevant school transition policies established in the
Compact within the DoDEA school system, and establishing a committee
within DoDEA to advise on compliance by DoDEA school.
(1) As required by the Compact, states establish Councils to
oversee the implementation of the Compact within the state. The Compact
prescribes membership of the State Council, which may include a
representative from the military community within the state. Since this
individual represents the interests of the military community to the
State Council, the military representative can only fulfill a liaison
role on the Council and must be designated by DoD. This rule defines
the role for the military representative (Sec. 89.7(a)), along with
the process (Sec. 89.7(b)) for coordinating the requests from State
Commissioners and designating these military representatives.
(2) The Compact allows DoD to send an ex-officio representative to
the Commission meetings, and also requires the DoD ex-officio
representative to participate on the Executive Committee of the
Commission. This rule provides guidelines for the DoD ex-officio
representative (Sec. 89.7(d)).
(3) This rule establishes policies for DoDEA governing the
transition of school age children in military families (Sec. 89.8 of
this rule), which are equivalent to the following policies included in
the Compact: Article IV--records and enrollment, Article V--placement
and attendance, Article VI--eligibility for enrollment, and Article
VII--graduation.
(4) This rule establishes a committee to advise DoDEA on compliance
with provisions in Sec. 89.8. The DoDEA Committee also provides input
to the
[[Page 11700]]
ex-officio member of the Commission on issues arising from DoDEA school
interactions with member States of the Compact, and acts as a
counterpart to State Councils of member States. Policies for assigning
a representative from the Military Departments to this committee are
included in Sec. 89.7(c).
IV. Cost and Benefit Analysis
There are no provisions in this proposed rule which are expected to
increase costs for members of the public. Requirements included in this
rule may require action to be taken by state education departments and
local education agencies as a result of requirements of the state laws.
The cost to the Department are summarized below:
(Military representative attending State Council meetings.
State Council meetings are generally held at a central location for the
state, and are expected to be held at least once per year. The military
representative would be required, while on duty and at government
expense, to travel to and attend the meeting. A meeting would be
expected to demand an average of 1.5 days (travel and meeting time),
which would cost an approximate average of $564 \1\ in opportunity
labor cost. Additionally, intrastate travel and per diem is expected to
cost an approximate average of $334.\2\ States vary with regards to the
number of military representatives they have requested to attend;
however, the estimated number of military representatives is 77.\3\
Applying the approximate average costs per year provides $43,430 in
opportunity labor costs and $25,720 in travel and per diem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Cost estimated on the salary of a GS-14 step 5 without
locality pay or percentage for benefits (average of $47 per hour)
times approximately 12 hours.
\2\ Cost of travel calculated at an average round trip requiring
300 miles times the 2015 mileage rate of $0.575 per mile (equals
approximately $172), plus per diem costs of $129 per day (national
estimate), plus proportional meals and incidentals for the second
day of $33 ($162).
\3\ Estimated number of total military representatives for the
50 member states and the District of Columbia, based on the average
of number currently designated in states with military
representatives (41 reps in 27 states).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identifying, nominating and designating a military
representative. DOD estimates approximately 76 hours \4\ of
administrative time to coordinate nominations per year, plus
approximately 76 hours \5\ to process, review, coordinate, sign and
distribute the designation letters. The opportunity labor cost of
coordination would be approximately $4,560 \6\ and completing the
designation letter, with accompanying documents, would be $4,400 \7\
per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Estimate 3 hours of staff time to receive the request; relay
the requirement to the designated Military Department and obtain
approval; and provide the name to the Office of Secretary of
Defense. Anticipate having to replace half of the military
representatives each year (38).
\5\ Estimate 2 hours of staff time to prepare the letter of
designation and accompanying documents and obtain a signature from
the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Community and
Family Policy. Anticipate processing 38 letters of designation per
year.
\6\ Cost estimated on the salary of a GS-13 step 5, without
locality pay or percentage for benefits (average of $40 per hour).
\7\ Cost estimated on the salary of a GS-14 step 5 with locality
pay for Washington DC, but no percentage for benefits (average of
$58 per hour).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ex-officio representation to the Military Interstate Child
Compact Commission (MIC3). This individual participates in the annual
conference, executive committee meeting and other standing committee
meetings and would cost DOD approximately $8,460 per year.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Cost estimated on three trips per year, each involving 3
days, at a location outside of Washington DC. The labor cost is
estimated on the salary of a GS-15 step 5 with locality pay for
Washington DC (no benefits included) time 72 hours ($4,900), plus
$3,560 for travel and per diem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, this proposed rule will direct DoDEA to transition
children under specific policies. These are the same policies that are
included in the Compact, Articles IV-VII, which have been shown to be
cost-neutral (and perhaps a cost-benefit) when implemented by local
education agencies within the states that are members of the
Compact.\9\ Essentially, schools are responsible for transitioning
children, and the proposed rules, based upon the transition policies
included in the Compact, provide a consistent approach that schools
apply in member states to the Compact. Hence, there is less variability
and uncertainty in the process. Applying these policies within DoDEA is
expected to produce similar results, since these policies would apply
to all children within the DoDEA school system (therefore applying a
consistent policy regardless of the child), and many of these proposed
policies represent the existing procedures used in DoDEA schools to
transition students. The DoD committee to oversee the implementation of
this rule within DoDEA is expected to cost approximately $3,250 per
year \10\ to administer and conduct meetings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Analysis accomplished by states as part of their legislative
process showed that the provisions of the Compact supporting the
transition of military children were fiscally neutral. Transition
occurs regardless of having an organized process, and the provisions
of the Compact were considered as providing consistent expectations
and administrative procedures capable of reducing the cost of
administering transition for military children.
\10\ Estimated on two meetings (each two hours in length) per
year, attended by 12 people with an average salary of a GS-14 step
5, with Washington DC locality pay (not including benefits); plus 8
hours of preparation time for the two meetings by a GS-14 step 5,
with Washington DC locality pay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The benefits derived from DoD's participation in the Compact accrue
to Service members and their families, particularly the 707,000 school-
age children educated by local education agencies and DoDEA.\11\ These
benefits have not necessarily been quantified, but can be described in
qualitative terms. Military moves are stressful for the entire family,
and transitioning to a new school creates stresses because of
uncertainty. Military children are confronted with unknown academic and
social challenges, and their parents must overcome new administrative
requirements to enroll them. The provisions included in the Compact
provide relief for some of the administrative requirements faced by
parents and the academic issues regularly experienced by military
children who generally attend six-to-nine different schools between
kindergarten and 12th grade.\12\ The goal of the Compact is to replace
the widely varying treatment of transitioning military students with a
comprehensive approach that provides a uniform policy in every school
district in every state that chooses to join. Through more uniform
transition policies, military children have an opportunity to
assimilate into their classes, extra-curricular activities and new
social circles more quickly. Additionally the Compact recognizes the
difficulties military children may have with being separated from a
parent due to a military deployment, allowing for liberal absences for
children to be with the deploying/returning parents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 2013 Demographic Profile of the Military Community, DMDC
Active Duty Military Family File (September 2013), page 132.
\12\ Council of State Governments, ``Interstate Compact on
Educational Opportunity for Military Children Legislative Resource
Kit,'' January 2008, page 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Compact Articles IV-VII were developed as a result of input
from 17 representative national and state stakeholders who were asked
to participate in a working group sponsored by the Council of State
Governments, National Center for Interstate Compacts.\13\ The majority
of
[[Page 11701]]
their recommendations came from work that had previously been presented
in studies, such as the Military Child Education Coalition's Secondary
Education Transition Study, conducted for the U.S. Army in 2001, and
the subsequent Memoranda of Agreement signed by nine school districts
which addressed ``the timely transfer of records, systems to ease
student transition during the first 2 weeks of enrollment, practices
that foster access to extracurricular programs, procedures to lessen
the adverse impact of moves of juniors and seniors, [and] variations in
school calendars and schedules,'' among other recommendations.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Contributing individuals and groups included: National
Association of Elementary School Principals; National Military
Family Association; Military Child Education Coalition; U.S.
Department of Education; National School Boards Association;
National PTA; Office of Lt Governor Beverly Purdue, NC; Alabama
State Senator; National School Superintendents Association (Local
School Superintendent); National Education Association; Military
Impacted Schools Association; Maryland Department of Education; Ofc
of the Under Secretary of Defense; California Department of
Education; Nevada State Senator; and the Florida Department of
Education; Education Commission of the States.
\14\ Kathleen F. Berg, ``Easing Transitions of Military
Dependents into Hawaii Public Schools: An Invitational Education
Link,'' Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice Volume 14, 2008,
page 44.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
This rule has been determined to be a significant regulatory action,
although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Sec. 202, Pub. L. 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In
2014, that threshold is approximately $141 million. This rule will not
mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments, nor
will it affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Department of Defense certifies that this rule is not subject
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not,
if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
amended, does not require us to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not impose reporting and record keeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
This rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism''). It has
been determined that it does not have sufficient Federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism summary impact
statement. This rule has no substantial effect on the States, or on the
current Federal-State relationship, or on the current distribution of
power and responsibilities among the various local officials. Nothing
in this rule preempts any State law or regulation. Therefore, DoD did
not consult with State and local officials because it was not
necessary.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 89
Children, Education, Interstate compact.
Accordingly 32 CFR part 89 is proposed to be added to read as
follows:
PART 89--INTERSTATE COMPACT ON EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR MILITARY
CHILDREN
Sec.
89.1 Purpose.
89.2 Applicability.
89.3 Definitions.
89.4 Policy.
89.5 Responsibilities.
89.6 Procedures.
89.7 Representatives to State Councils, the DoDEA Committee and
MIC3.
89.8 Compact provisions.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2164, 20 U.S.C. 921-932.
Sec. 89.1 Purpose.
In accordance with section 539 of Public Law 111-84, this part
establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures
to implement the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for
Military Children (referred to in this part as the ``Compact'') within
the DoD.
Sec. 89.2 Applicability.
This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the
Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies,
the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within
the DoD.
Sec. 89.3 Definitions.
These terms and their definitions are for the purposes of this
part.
504 plan. A plan required pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 794 specifying the
modifications and accommodations for a child with a disability to meet
the individual educational needs of that child as adequately as the
needs of children without disabilities are met. The plans can include
accommodations such as wheelchair ramps, blood sugar monitoring, an
extra set of textbooks, a peanut-free lunch environment, home
instruction, or a tape recorder or keyboard for taking notes.
Children of military families. School-aged children who are
enrolled in kindergarten through twelfth grade and are in the
households of Service members who:
(1) Are on active duty, including members of the National Guard and
Reserve on active duty orders pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1211;
(2) Are active duty or veterans who are severely wounded, ill, or
injured; or
(3) Die on active duty or as a result of injuries sustained on
active duty.
(4) Children of military members who are severely wounded, ill, or
injured retain this designation for 1 year after discharge or
retirement. Children of military members who die on active duty or as a
result of injuries sustained on active duty, retain this designation
for 1 year after death.
Deployment. The period 1 month prior to the military members'
departure from their home station on military orders through 6 months
after return to their home station.
Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) Committee. A DoD
committee established pursuant to this part by Director of DoDEA to
advise DoDEA on compliance with provisions in Sec. 89.8 by DoDEA
schools. The DoDEA Committee also provides input to the ex-officio
member of the Commission on issues arising from DoDEA school
interactions with member States of the Compact, and acts as a
counterpart to State Councils of member States.
[[Page 11702]]
Education records. Those official records, files, and data directly
related to a child and maintained by the school or local educational
agency (LEA) or state educational agency (SEA), including but not
limited to, records encompassing all the material kept in the child's
cumulative folder such as general identifying data, records of
attendance and of academic work completed, records of achievement and
results of evaluative tests, health data, disciplinary status, test
protocols, and individualized education programs (IEPs).
Ex-officio member of the Commission. Non-voting member of the
Commission who may include, but not be limited to, members of the
representative organizations of military family advocates, LEA
officials, parent and teacher groups, the DoD, the Education Commission
of the State, the Interstate Agreement on the Qualification of
Educational Personnel, and other interstate compacts affecting the
education of children of military members.
Extracurricular activity. A voluntary activity sponsored by the
school or LEA or SEA or an organization sanctioned by the LEA or SEA.
Extracurricular activities include but are not limited to preparation
for and involvement in public performances, contests, athletic
competitions, demonstrations, displays, and club activities.
IEP. When a child is identified as a child with disabilities in
accordance with Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), he
or she must have a written document that describes the special
education supports and services the child will receive. The IEP is
developed by a team that includes the child's parents and school staff.
Interstate Compact on Education Opportunity for Military Children
(the Compact). An agreement approved through State legislation that
requires member States to follow provisions supporting the transition
of children of military families between school systems in member
States. As part of joining the Compact, States agree to participate in
the Commission and pay dues to the Commission to support its oversight
of the Compact.
LEA. A public authority legally constituted by the State as an
administrative agency to provide control of and direction for
kindergarten through twelfth grade public educational institutions. For
the purpose of administering the provisions of the Compact in Sec.
89.8 of this part, DoDEA school districts as defined in 20 U.S.C. 932
are equivalent to an LEA.
Member State. A State that has enacted the Compact.
Military Interstate Children's Compact Commission (MIC3). The MIC3,
also known as the Interstate Commission on Educational Opportunity for
Military Children (sometimes referred to as the ``Interstate
Commission'' or ``the Commission''), is the governing body of the
Compact composed of representatives from each member State, as well as
various ex-officio members. The Commission provides general oversight
of the agreement, creates and enforces rules governing the Compact, and
promotes training and compliance with the Compact. Each member State
will be allowed one vote on Compact matters, and the Commission will
provide the venue for solving interstate issues and disputes.
Military Family Education Liaison. Individual appointed or
designated by State Council of each member state to assist military
families and the State in facilitating the implementation of the
Compact. Military members and DoD civilian employees cannot perform
this function.
Military installation. A base, camp, post, station, yard, center,
homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under DoD
jurisdiction, including any leased facility. (This term does not
include any facility used primarily for civil works, rivers and harbors
projects, or flood control projects.)
Military representative to a State Council. Individual designated
by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Community and
Family Policy (DASD(MC&FP)) to perform the duties and responsibilities
defined in Sec. 89.5 of this part. The military representative is
responsible for representing the interest of the DoD in fostering
easier transition of children of military families according to their
designation (installation representative, Military Department
representative or statewide representative). The military
representative will be a military member or DoD civilian who can remain
in the position for at least 2 years and who has a direct interface
with the State education system as part of official duties or has
supervisory responsibility for those who do.
Military representative to the DoDEA Committee. Individual
nominated to represent all four Services by the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (OASA(M&RA)),
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Manpower and Reserve
Affairs (OASN(M&RA)), or Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air
Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (OASAF(M&RA)) on a rotational
basis and appointed by the DASD(MC&FP) for a 2-year term. Because DoDEA
is a DoD Component the military representative may act as a full
participant in the DoDEA Committee.
Receiving State. The State to which a child of a military family is
sent, brought, or caused to be sent or brought.
SEA. A public authority similar to an LEA, legally constituted by
the State as an administrative agency to provide control of and
direction for kindergarten through twelfth grade public educational
institutions for the entire State.
Sending State. The State from which a child of a military family is
sent, brought, or caused to be sent or brought.
State. State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American
Samoa, the Northern Marianas Islands and any other U.S. territory or
possession. For purposes of administering the provisions of the Compact
in Sec. 89.8 of this part, DoD is considered a State and DoDEA is
considered the equivalent of a State department of education for DoD.
State Council. A body that coordinates among government agencies,
LEAs, and military installations concerning the member State's
participation in and compliance with the Compact and the Commission
activities. A member State may determine the membership of its own
Council, but membership must include at least: The State superintendent
of education; superintendent of a school district with a high
concentration of military children; representative (as a liaison) from
a military installation; one representative each from the legislative
and executive branches of State government; and other offices and
stakeholder groups the State Council deems appropriate.
Transition.
(1) The formal and physical process of transferring from school to
school; or
(2) The period of time in which a child moves from a school in the
sending State to a school in the receiving State.
Veteran. A person who served in the military and who was discharged
or released from the military under conditions other than dishonorable.
Sec. 89.4 Policy.
In accordance with Section 539 of Public Law 111-84, ``National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010'' and DoD 5500.07-R,
``Joint Ethics Regulations (JER)'' (available at https://www.dtic.mil/
whs/directives/corres/pdf/
[[Page 11703]]
550007r.pdf), it is DoD policy to support the intent of the Compact by
reducing the difficulty children of military families (referred to in
this part as ``children'' or ``the child'') have in transferring
between school systems because of frequent moves and deployment of
their parents. DoD will support the Compact by:
(a) Designating military liaisons to State Councils of member
States, the DoDEA Committee, and the MIC3.
(b) Implementing the intent of the Compact in the DoDEA to ensure:
(1) Timely enrollment of children in school so they are not
penalized due to:
(i) Late or delayed transfers of educational records from the
previous school district(s); or
(ii) Differences in entrance or age requirements.
(2) Placement of children in educational courses and programs,
including special educational services, so they are not penalized due
to differences in attendance requirements, scheduling, sequencing,
grading, or course content.
(3) Flexible qualification and eligibility of children so they can
have an equitable chance at participation in extracurricular, academic,
athletic, and social activities.
(4) Graduation within the same timeframe as the children's peers.
(c) Promoting through DoDEA and the Military Departments:
(1) Flexibility and cooperation among SEAs or LEAs, DoDEA, Military
Departments, parents, and children to achieve educational success.
(2) Coordination among the various State agencies, LEAs, and
military installations regarding the State's participation in the
Compact.
Sec. 89.5 Responsibilities.
(a) Under the authority, direction, and control of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)), the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
(ASD(M&RA)) oversees the implementation of this part.
(b) Under the authority, direction, and control of the ASD (M&RA),
the DASD(MC&FP):
(1) Designates military representatives as liaisons to State
councils, nominated by the Secretaries of the Military Departments by
the procedures outlined in Sec. 89.7 of this part.
(2) Designates the DoD ex-officio member of MIC3, insofar as DoD is
invited to do so by MIC3.
(3) Maintains a roster of designated liaisons to State councils in
accordance with 32 CFR part 310.
(4) Monitors issues arising under the Compact:
(i) Affecting children of military families attending and
transferring between member State schools; and
(ii) the implementation of Sec. 89.8 of this part, affecting
children of military families transferring between member state schools
and DoDEA's schools (consisting of the Department of Defense Schools
(DoDDS)--Europe, DoDDS--Pacific, and the Domestic Dependent Elementary
and Secondary Schools (DDESS)).
(c) Under the authority, direction, and control of ASD (M&RA), the
Director, DoDEA:
(1) To the extent allowable by 10 U.S.C. 2164 and 20 U.S.C. 921-
932, adjusts operating policies and procedures issued pursuant to DoD
Directive 1342.20, ``Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA)''
(available at https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134220p.pdf) to implement the provisions of the Compact described in
Sec. 89.8 of this part.
(2) Informs boards and councils, described in DoD Instruction
1342.15, ``Educational Advisory Committees and Councils'' (available at
https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134215p.pdf) and DoD
Instruction 1342.25, ``School Boards for Department of Defense Domestic
Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools (DDESS)'' (available at
https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/134225p.pdf), of the
Compact provisions in Sec. 89.8 of this part and the DoDEA
administration of these provisions.
(3) Addresses disputes over provisions in Sec. 89.8 of this part
between member States and DoDEA. When differences cannot be resolved
with a member State, works with MIC3 to resolve these disputes.
(4) Establishes the DoDEA Committee to review compliance with the
provisions in Sec. 89.8 of this part and to address issues raised by
the Secretaries of the Military Departments concerning the
implementation of these provisions.
(5) Ensures all personally identifiable information (PII) is
collected, maintained, disseminated, and used in accordance with 32 CFR
part 310.
(6) Ensures that DoDEA schools comply with Sec. 89.8 and that
DoDEA school-level officials inform DoDEA students transferring to
schools in member States of the benefits extended by receiving States
under the Compact.
(d) The Secretaries of the Military Departments:
(1) Nominate military representatives, in accordance with the
procedures outlined in Sec. 89.7 of this part, for designation as
liaisons to State Councils by the DASD(MC&FP) when such DoD liaison is
requested.
(2) Establish departmental policies and procedures to inform
military communities of:
(i) The provisions of this part as it affects children of military
families attending and transferring between member State schools; and
(ii) the provisions in Sec. 89.8 of this part concerning students
transferring between DoDEA and member State schools.
(3) Procedures to resolve issues or challenges raised by parents
concerning the provisions of Sec. 89.8 of this part.
Sec. 89.6 Procedures.
DoD implements policy in this part by:
(a) Establishing a committee within DoDEA (referred to in this part
as the ``DoDEA Committee'').
(b) Designating military representatives to the State Councils of
the member States and the DoDEA Committee in accordance with procedures
in Sec. 89.7.
(c) Designating the ex-officio member to MIC3 in accordance with
Sec. 89.5 and Sec. 89.7.
(d) Ensuring DoDEA compliance with the selected provisions of the
Compact described in Sec. 89.8.
Sec. 89.7 Representatives to State Councils, the DoDEA Committee and
MIC3.
(a) Military Representatives as Liaisons to State Councils. In
accordance with section 3-201 of DoD 5500.07-R, military
representatives to State Councils will:
(1) Be a military member or a civilian employee of DoD who has a
direct interface with the State education system as part of official
duties or has supervisory responsibility for those who do.
(2) Only represent DoD interests (not the interests of the State
Council), and consequently may not:
(i) Engage in management or control of the State Council
(therefore, may not vote or make decisions on daily administration of
council);
(ii) Endorse or allow the appearance of DoD endorsement of the
State Council or its events, products, services, or enterprises;
(iii) Represent the State Council to third parties; or
(iv) Represent the State Council to the U.S. Government, as
prohibited by federal criminal statutes.
(3) Make clear to the State Council that:
(i) The opinions expressed by the representative do not bind DoD or
any DoD Component to any action.
[[Page 11704]]
(ii) If included on State Council Web sites, all references to the
representative by name or title must indicate that they are the
``Military Representative'' as opposed to a council member.
(4) Notify the chain of command of issues requiring policy
decisions or actions requested of the military community within the
State.
(5) When called upon to act as the spokesperson for one or more
than one installation:
(i) Get feedback from the designated points of contact at each
military installation within his or her responsibility.
(ii) Coordinate proposed input to the State Council with the
appropriate points of contact for each military installation within his
or her responsibility.
(iii) Act as a conduit for information between the State Council
and each military installation within his or her responsibility.
(iv) Provide feedback through the chain of command to the points of
contact for each military installation within his or her responsibility
and, as appropriate, to the OASA(M&RA), the OASN(M&RA), or the
OASAF(M&RA).
(6) Notify the State Council and the appropriate Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Military Department listed in paragraph (a)(5)(iv) of
this section, through the chain of command, of reassignment or other
circumstances that would require a replacement.
(b) Nomination Process for Military Representatives to State
Councils.
(1) In accordance with DoD 5500.07-R, military representatives are
nominated by the Military Departments and designated by the
DASD(MC&FP), not by State officials. Depending on the number of
military representatives required by State statute, designating
representatives to a State Council will be accomplished according to
the processes outlined in Table 1:
Table 1--Process for Designating Military Representatives to State Councils
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whereupon the official
If State statute concerning military The State Commissioner Who requests a written designation is
representatives provides for: contacts: selection be made by: made by:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One representative for all military DASD(MC&FP)............ OASA(M&RA), OASN(M&RA), DASD(MC&FP).
children in the State. or OASAF(M&RA)
responsible for
providing a
representative for the
State listed in Table
2.
One representative for each Military DASD(MC&FP)............ OASA(M&RA), OASN(M&RA), DASD(MC&FP).
Service. and OASAF(M&RA).
One representative for each military DASD(MC&FP)............ OASA(M&RA), OASN(M&RA) DASD(MC&FP).
installation in the State. and OASAF(M&RA).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) When there is more than one military representative to a State
Council (e.g., one per installation or one per Military Department
represented in the State), the individual appointed by the responsible
Military Department (Table 2) will serve as the lead military
representative when DoD must speak with a single voice.
(3) In circumstances where the State requests an individual by
name, the DASD(MC&FP) will forward the request to the individual's
Military Department for consideration. If that Military Department is
different from the one designated in Table 2, the DASD(MC&FP) will
first obtain the concurrence of the responsible Military Department.
(4) Military representatives are expected to serve a minimum of 2
years. When notified by the incumbent military representative of the
need for a replacement, the OASA(M&RA), OASN(M&RA), or OASAF(M&RA) will
inform DASD(MC&FP) of the request.
(5) In accordance with the Compact, State officials appoint or
designate the Military Family Education Liaison for the State. Service
members and DoD civilians cannot be appointed or designated to fill
this position for the State.
Table 2--Military Department Areas of Authority for Selecting a Single
Military Representative for the State Council
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Department Areas of authority
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army............................... Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Georgia,
Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New
York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
South Carolina, Texas, Vermont,
Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin.
Navy............................... American Samoa, California,
Connecticut, District of Columbia,
Florida, Guam, Maine, Mississippi,
New Hampshire, North Carolina,
Northern Marianas, Oregon, Puerto
Rico, Rhode Island, Tennessee,
Virginia, Virgin Islands.
Air Force.......................... Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho,
Illinois, Massachusetts, Montana,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New
Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, South
Dakota, Utah, Wyoming.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Military Representative to the DoDEA Committee. Membership of
the DoDEA Committee will include a representative from one of the
Military Services to represent all four Services. OASA(M&RA),
OASN(M&RA), or OASAF(M&RA) will nominate a representative on a
rotational basis who will be designated for a 2-year term by the
DASD(MC&FP).
(d) Ex-Officio Member to MIC3. In accordance with section 3-201 of
DoD 5500.07-R, the DoD ex-officio member to the Commission must:
(1) Be a military member or a civilian employee of DoD who can
remain in the position for at least 2 years and who has a direct
interface with DoDEA and the U.S. public education system as part of
official duties or has supervisory responsibility for those who do.
(2) Attend as a liaison meetings of MIC3, its Executive Committee,
and other standing committees where requested by the Commission.
(3) Only represent DoD interests (not the interests of MIC3), and
consequently may not:
[[Page 11705]]
(i) Engage in management or control of MIC3 (therefore, may not
vote or make decisions on daily administration of MIC3);
(ii) Endorse or allow the appearance of DoD endorsement of MIC3, or
its events, products, services, or enterprises;
(iii) Represent the Commission to third parties; or
(iv) Represent MIC3 to the U.S. Government, as prohibited by
criminal statutes.
(4) Make clear to MIC3 that:
(i) The opinions expressed by the incumbent do not bind DoD or any
DoD Component to any action.
(ii) If included on MIC3 Web sites, all references to the incumbent
by name or title must indicate that they are the ``DoD Ex-Officio
Member'' as opposed to a MIC3 member.
(5) Notify the chain of command of issues requiring policy
decisions or actions requested of DoD.
Sec. 89.8 Compact provisions.
(a) DoDEA Area School Districts Relationship With SEAs or LEAs in
Member States.
(1) For the purposes of DoD's implementation of the Compact in the
schools it operates, DoDEA's area offices (Department of Defense
Dependent Schools--Europe, Department of Defense Dependent Schools--
Pacific, and the Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools)
and their schools are considered as the equivalent of LEAs and SEAs,
respectively.
(2) Each DoDEA area acts as the ``receiving LEA'' and ``sending
LEA'' in working with LEAs or SEAs in member States.
(b) Articles IV Through VII of the Compact. This section describes
the specific duties that DoDEA's LEAs have as ``sending'' or
``receiving'' LEAs. DoDEA's duties under this section will reciprocate
the duties assumed by member State LEAs or SEAs to children of military
families, as expressed by their respective State's implementation of
the Compact Articles IV through VII. DoDEA will implement the
provisions described below, which, while retaining the intent of the
Compact, have been modified as needed in the DoDEA context.
(1) Article IV: Education Records and Enrollment
(i) Unofficial or ``Hand-Carried'' Education Records
(A) If official education records cannot be released to the parents
for transfer, the DoDEA custodian of the records, as the sending LEA
shall provide to the parent a complete set of unofficial education
records.
(B) Upon receipt of the unofficial education records, the DoDEA
school, as the school in the receiving LEA shall enroll and
appropriately place the child as quickly as possible based on the
information in the unofficial records, pending validation by the
official records.
(ii) Official Education Records or Transcripts
(A) The DoDEA school, acting as the receiving LEA shall request the
child's official education record from the school in the sending State
at the same time as DoDEA school enrolls and conditionally places the
child.
(B) Upon receipt of the request for a child's records, the school
in DoDEA, acting as the sending LEA will provide the child's official
education records to the school in the receiving State, within 10 work
days. If there is a designated school staff break, records will be
provided as soon as possible; however, the time will not exceed 10 work
days after the return of staff. DoDEA will initiate actions to meet
these deadlines without violating the disclosure rules of the Privacy
Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
(iii) Immunizations
(A) Parents have 30 days from the date of enrolling their child in
a DoDEA school to have their child(ren) immunized in accordance with
DoDEA's immunization requirements, as the receiving LEA.
(B) For a series of immunizations, parents must begin initial
vaccinations of their child(ren) within 30 days.
(iv) Entrance Age
(A) At the time of transition and regardless of the age of the
child, the DoDEA school, acting as the receiving LEA, shall enroll the
transitioning child- at the -grade level--as the child's grade level
(i.e. in kindergarten through grade 12) in the sending state's LEA.
(B) A child who has satisfactorily completed the prerequisite grade
level in the sending state's LEA will be eligible for enrollment in the
next higher grade level in DoDEA school, acting as the receiving LEA,
regardless of the child's age.
(C) To be admitted to a school in the receiving State, the parent
or guardian of a child transferring from a DoDEA (sending) LEA must
provide:
(1) Official military orders showing the military member or the
member's spouse was assigned to the sending State or commuting area of
the State in which the child was previously enrolled. If the child was
residing with a guardian other than the military member during the
previous enrollment, proof of guardianship (as specified in the
Compact) should be provided by the parent or guardian to the receiving
LEA or SEA to establish eligibility under the Compact.
(2) An official letter or transcript from the sending school
authority that shows the student's record of attendance, academic
information, and grade placement.
(3) Evidence of immunization against communicable diseases.
(4) Evidence of date of birth.
(2) Article V: Placement and Attendance
(i) Course Placement
(A) As long as the course is offered by DoDEA, as the receiving
LEA, it shall honor placement of a transfer student in courses based on
the child's placement or educational assessment in the sending State
school.
(B) Course placement includes, but is not limited to, Honors,
International Baccalaureate, Advanced Placement, vocational, technical,
and career pathways courses.
(C) Continuing the child's academic program from the previous
school and promoting placement in academically and career challenging
courses shall be a primary consideration when DoDEA considers the
placement of a transferring child.
(D) DoDEA, acting as the receiving LEA, may perform subsequent
evaluations to ensure the child's appropriate course placement.
(ii) Educational Program Placement
(A) As long as the program is offered by DoDEA, acting as a
receiving LEA, it will honor placement of the child in educational
programs based on current educational assessments and placement in like
programs in the sending State. Such programs include, but are not
limited to, gifted and talented programs and English language learners.
(B) The receiving State school may perform subsequent evaluations
to ensure the child's appropriate educational program placement.
(iii) Special Education Services
(A) DoDEA, acting as the receiving LEA, will initially provide
comparable services to a child with disabilities based on his or her
current IEP in compliance with 20 U.S.C. chapter 33, also known and
referred to in this part as the ``Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA),'' as amended, and the requirements of Executive
Order 13160. DoDEA may perform subsequent evaluations to ensure the
child's appropriate placement consistent with IDEA.
(B) DoDEA, acting as the receiving LEA, will make reasonable
accommodations and modifications to address the needs of incoming
children with disabilities, in compliance with the requirements of 29
U.S.C. 794 and E.O.
[[Page 11706]]
13160, and subject to an existing 504 plan to provide the child with
equal access to education.
(iv) Placement Flexibility. DoDEA's administrative officials must
have flexibility in waiving course or program prerequisites or other
preconditions for placement in courses or programs offered under the
jurisdiction of DoDEA.
(v) Absences Related to Deployment Activities. A child whose parent
or legal guardian is an active duty Service member and has been called
to duty for, is on leave from, or has immediately returned from
deployment to a combat zone or combat support posting, will be granted
additional excused absences under governing DoDEA rules.
(3) Article VI: Eligibility for Enrollment
(i) Eligibility in DoDEA Schools. Eligibility of dependents of
military members is governed by the laws in 10 U.S.C. 2164 and their
implementing regulations. Only children who are eligible to attend
DoDEA schools may do so, regardless of their transition status.
(ii) Eligibility for Extracurricular Participation. DoDEA, acting
as the receiving LEA, will facilitate the opportunity for transitioning
children's inclusion in extracurricular activities, regardless of
application deadlines, to the extent the children are otherwise
qualified.
(4) Article VII: Graduation. To facilitate the child's on-time
graduation, DoDEA will incorporate the following procedures:
(i) Waiver Requirements
(A) DoDEA administrative officials will waive specific courses
required for graduation if similar course work has been satisfactorily
completed in another LEA or provide reasonable justification for
denial.
(B) If DoDEA, as a receiving LEA, does not grant a waiver to a
child who would qualify to graduate from the sending school, DoDEA will
provide an alternative means of acquiring required coursework so that
graduation may occur on time.
(C) If DoDEA, as the receiving LEA, requires a graduation project,
volunteer community service hours, or other DoDEA specific requirement,
DoDEA may waive those requirements.
(ii) Exit Exams
(A) DoDEA, as a receiving LEA, must:
(1) Accept exit or end-of-course exams required for graduation from
the sending State.
(2) Accept national norm-referenced achievement tests.
(3) Provide alternative testing in lieu of testing requirements for
graduation in the receiving from a DoDEA school.
(B) If the alternatives in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section
cannot be accommodated by DoDEA as the receiving LEA for a child
transferring in his or her senior year, then the provisions of
paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(C) of this section will apply.
(iii) Transfers During Senior Year
(A) If a child transferring at the beginning or during his or her
senior year is ineligible to graduate from DoDEA, as the receiving LEA,
after all alternatives have been considered, DoDEA will request a
diploma from the sending LEA or SEA. DoDEA will ensure the receipt of a
diploma from the sending LEA or SEA, if the child meets the graduation
requirements of the sending LEA or SEA.
(B) If one of the States in question is not a member of this
Compact, DoDEA, as a receiving state, will use best efforts to
facilitate a transferring child's on-time graduation in accordance with
paragraphs (b)(1)(iv)(A) and (b)(1)(iv)(B) of this section.
Dated: March 2, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2016-04970 Filed 3-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P