Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Base Year Emission Inventories for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard, 11726-11727 [2016-04877]
Download as PDF
11726
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
adequately provide for permitting fees
related to the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS
when necessary. Accordingly, EPA is
proposing to approve South Carolina’s
infrastructure SIP submission with
respect to section 110(a)(2)(L).
13. 110(a)(2)(M) Consultation/
participation by affected local entities:
Section 110(a)(2)(M) of the Act requires
states to provide for consultation and
participation in SIP development by
local political subdivisions affected by
the SIP. Regulation 61–62.5, Standard
No. 7, Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, of the South Carolina SIP
requires that SC DHEC notify the public,
which includes local entities, of an
application, preliminary determination,
the activity or activities involved in the
permit action, any emissions change
associated with any permit
modification, and the opportunity for
comment prior to making a final
permitting decision. Also, as noted
above, S.C. Code Ann. Section 48–1–
50(8) allows SC DHEC to ‘‘Cooperate
with the governments of the United
States or other states or state agencies or
organizations, officials, or unofficial, in
respect to pollution control matters or
for the formulation of interstate
pollution control compacts or
agreements.’’ By way of example, SC
DHEC has recently worked closely with
local political subdivisions during the
development of its Transportation
Conformity SIP, Regional Haze
Implementation Plan, and Ozone Early
Action Compacts. EPA has made the
preliminary determination that South
Carolina’s SIP and practices adequately
demonstrate consultation with affected
local entities related to the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS. Accordingly, EPA is
proposing to approve South Carolina’s
infrastructure SIP submission with
respect to section 110(a)(2)(M).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Proposed Action
With the exception of interstate
transport provisions pertaining to the
contribution to nonattainment or
interference with maintenance in other
states and visibility protection
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
and (II) (prongs 1, 2, and 4), EPA is
proposing to approve South Carolina’s
May 8, 2014, SIP submission for the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS for the above
described infrastructure SIP
requirements. EPA is proposing to
approve these portions of South
Carolina’s infrastructure SIP submission
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS
because these aspects of the submission
are consistent with section 110 of the
CAA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject
to review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.);
• is certified as not having a significant
economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–
4);
• does not have Federalism implications as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or safety
risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action subject
to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of Section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) because application of those
requirements would be inconsistent with
the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59
FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed action for
the state of South Carolina does not
have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). The Catawba Indian
Nation Reservation is located within the
State of South Carolina. Pursuant to the
Catawba Indian Claims Settlement Act,
South Carolina statute 27–16–120, ‘‘all
state and local environmental laws and
regulations apply to the [Catawba Indian
Nation] and Reservation and are fully
enforceable by all relevant state and
local agencies and authorities.’’
However, EPA has determined that
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
because this proposed rule does not
have substantial direct effects on an
Indian Tribe because, as noted above,
this action is not approving any specific
rule, but rather proposing that South
Carolina’s already approved SIP meets
certain CAA requirements. EPA notes
today’s action will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 19, 2016.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016–04728 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0664; FRL–9943–32–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Base Year
Emission Inventories for the 2008
8-Hour Ozone Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA) on September 3, 2014, to address
emission inventory requirements for the
Illinois portions of the ChicagoNaperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin
and St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois ozone
nonattainment areas under the 2008
ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard. The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires emission inventories for all
ozone nonattainment areas. The
emission inventories contained in
Illinois’ September 3, 2014, submission
meet this CAA requirement.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2014–0664 at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
Aburano.Douglas@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Doty, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6057,
Doty.Edward@epa.gov.
In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving IEPA’s SIP
revision as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because EPA views this
as a noncontroversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in
response to this rule, no further activity
is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be
withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note
that, if EPA receives adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. For additional
information see the direct final rule,
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 04, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: February 22, 2016.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2016–04877 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0205; FRL–9943–27–
Region 8]
Designation of Areas for Air Quality
Planning Purposes; Redesignation
Request and Associated Maintenance
Plan for Billings, MT 2010 SO2
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On December 14, 2015, the
State of Montana submitted a request for
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to redesignate the Billings,
Montana, 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) nonattainment area to
attainment and to approve a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
containing a maintenance plan for the
area. In response to this submittal, the
EPA is proposing to take the following
actions: Determine that the Billings SO2
nonattainment area is attaining the 2010
SO2 primary NAAQS; approve
Montana’s plan for maintaining
attainment of the 2010 SO2 primary
NAAQS in the area; and redesignate the
Billings SO2 nonattainment area to
attainment for the 2010 SO2 primary
NAAQS.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before April 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2015–0205, at https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11727
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Clark, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–
1129, (303) 312–7104, clark.adam@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
1. Submitting Confidential Business
Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to
the EPA through www.regulations.gov or
email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI.
For CBI information in a disk or CD
ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM
07MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11726-11727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04877]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0664; FRL-9943-32-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Base Year Emission Inventories for
the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) on September 3, 2014,
to address emission inventory requirements for the Illinois portions of
the Chicago-Naperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin and St. Louis,
Missouri-Illinois ozone nonattainment areas under the 2008 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires
emission inventories for all ozone nonattainment areas. The emission
inventories contained in Illinois' September 3, 2014, submission meet
this CAA requirement.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2014-0664 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to
Aburano.Douglas@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
[[Page 11727]]
submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may
publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information
Contact'' section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Doty, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6057, Doty.Edward@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving IEPA's SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time. Please note that, if EPA
receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information see the
direct final rule, which is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register.
Dated: February 22, 2016.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2016-04877 Filed 3-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P