Expansion of the Willamette Valley Viticultural Area, 11110-11113 [2016-04710]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
11110
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
for a utility in a residential unit
possesses all of the following attributes:
(i) The utility consumed in the unit is
described in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A) of
this section or in § 1.42–10T(e)(1)(i)(B);
(A) The utility is purchased from or
through a local utility company by the
building owner (or its agent or other
party acting on behalf of the building
owner).
(B) [Reserved]. For further guidance
see § 1.42–10T(e)(1)(i)(B) through
(e)(1)(i)(C)(3).
(ii) The tenants in the unit are billed
for, and pay the building owner (or its
agent or other party acting on behalf of
the building owner) for, the unit’s
consumption of the utility;
(iii) The billed amount reflects the
unit’s actual consumption of the utility.
In the case of sewerage charges,
however, if the unit’s sewerage charges
are combined on the bill with water
charges and the sewerage charges are
determined based on the actual water
consumption of the unit, then the bill is
treated as reflecting the actual sewerage
consumption of the unit; and
(iv) The rate at which the building
owner bills for the utility satisfies the
following requirements:
(A) To the extent that the utility
consumed is described in paragraph
(e)(1)(i)(A) of this section, the utility rate
charged to the tenants of the unit does
not exceed the rate incurred by the
building owner for that utility; and
(B) To the extent that the utility
consumed is described in § 1.42–
10T(e)(1)(i)(B), the utility rate charged to
the tenants of the unit does not exceed
the rate described in § 1.42–
10T(e)(1)(iv)(B).
(2) Administrative fees. If the owner
charges a unit’s tenants a fee for
administering an actual-consumption
submetering arrangement, the fee is not
considered gross rent for purposes of
section 42(g)(2). The preceding
sentence, however, does not apply
unless the fee is computed in the same
manner for every unit receiving the
same submetered utility service, nor
does it apply to any amount by which
the aggregate monthly fee or fees for all
of the unit’s utilities under one or more
actual-consumption submetering
arrangements exceed the greater of—
(i) Five dollars per month;
(ii) An amount (if any) designated by
publication in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii) of this
chapter); or
(iii) The lesser of—
(A) The dollar amount (if any)
specifically prescribed under a State or
local law; or
(B) A maximum amount (if any)
designated by publication in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii) of this chapter).
■ Par. 5. Section 1.42–10T is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.42–10T Energy obtained directly from
renewable sources (temporary).
(a) through (e)(1)(i)(A) [Reserved]. For
further guidance see § 1.42–10(a)
through (e)(1)(i)(A).
(B) Utility not purchased from or
through a local utility company. The
utility is not described in § 1.42–
10(e)(1)(i)(A) and is produced from a
renewable source (within the meaning
of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(C) of this section).
(C) Renewable source. For purposes of
paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section, a
utility is produced from a renewable
source if—
(1) It is energy that is produced from
energy property described in section 48;
(2) It is energy that is produced from
property that is part of a facility
described in section 45(d)(1) through
(4), (6), (9), or (11); or
(3) It is a utility that is described in
guidance published for this purpose in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii) of this chapter).
(ii) through (iv)(A) [Reserved]. For
further guidance see § 1.42–10(e)(1)(ii)
through (e)(1)(iv)(A).
(B) The rate described in this
paragraph (e)(1)(iv)(B) is the rate at
which the local utility company would
have charged the tenants in the unit for
the utility if that entity had provided it
to them.
(2) [Reserved]
(f) Date of applicability. This section
applies to a building owner’s taxable
years beginning on or after March 3,
2016. A building owner may apply the
provisions of this section to the building
owner’s taxable years beginning before
March 3, 2016.
(g) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on March 1, 2019.
■ Par. 6. Section 1.42–12 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(5) to read as
follows:
§ 1.42–12
rules.
Effective dates and transitional
(a) * * *
(5) Additional effective dates affecting
utility allowances. (i) The following
provisions apply to a building owner’s
taxable years beginning on or after
March 3, 2016—
(A) The second sentence in § 1.42–
10(a);
(B) Section 1.42–10(b)(3);
(C) The first sentence in § 1.42–
10(b)(4)(ii)(A);
(D) Section 1.42–10(b)(4)(ii)(E); and
(E) Section 1.42–10(e).
(ii) A building owner may apply these
provisions to the building owner’s
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
taxable years beginning before March 3,
2016. Otherwise, the utility allowances
provisions that apply to taxable years
beginning before March 3, 2016 are
contained in § 1.42–10 (see 26 CFR part
1 revised as of April 1, 2015).
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: February 8, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–04606 Filed 3–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2015–0008; T.D. TTB–134;
Ref: Notice No. 152]
RIN 1513–AC21
Expansion of the Willamette Valley
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the approximately 5,360-square mile
‘‘Willamette Valley’’ viticultural area in
northwestern Oregon, by approximately
29 square miles. Neither the established
viticultural area nor the expansion area
is located within any other established
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective April
4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (dated
December 10, 2013, superseding
Treasury Order 120–01 (Revised),
‘‘Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau,’’ dated January 24, 2003), to the
TTB Administrator to perform the
functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these
laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth the
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Petitioners
may use the same process to request
changes involving established AVAs.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for
petitions for modifying established
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
AVAs. Petitions to expand an
established AVA must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed expansion area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the name
of the established AVA;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
expansion area;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed expansion area
that affect viticulture, such as climate,
geology, soils, physical features, and
elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the
established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established
AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
expansion area, with the boundary of
the proposed expansion area clearly
drawn thereon; and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed expansion area boundary
based on USGS map markings.
Petition to Expand the Willamette
Valley AVA
TTB received a petition from Steve
Thomson, the executive vice president
of King Estate Winery in Eugene,
Oregon, proposing to expand the
established ‘‘Willamette Valley’’ AVA in
northwestern Oregon. The Willamette
Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.90) was
established by T.D. ATF–162, which
was published in the Federal Register
on December 1, 1983 (48 FR 54221). The
Willamette Valley AVA covers
approximately 5,360 square miles in
Benton, Lane, Linn, Clackamas, Lincoln,
Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Tillamook,
Washington, and Yamhill Counties.
Neither the proposed expansion area
nor the established AVA are located
within any other established AVA.
The proposed expansion area is
located in Lane County and is adjacent
to the southern tip of the established
Willamette Valley AVA boundary and
covers approximately 29 square miles.
The King Estate Winery operates one of
the two commercial vineyards that
cover a total of 508 acres within the
proposed expansion area, and provided
information that the second vineyard
owner also supports the proposed
expansion. The King Estate Winery and
the second vineyard each have a winery
within the proposed expansion area. A
third winery is also included in the
proposed expansion area; however, it
does not operate a vineyard within the
proposed expansion area. The vineyards
and wineries did not exist at the time
the Willamette Valley AVA was
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11111
established in 1983 and currently are
not within any AVA. The petition
included letters from the president of
the Willamette Valley Wineries
Association and the president of the
Oregon Winegrowers Association in
support of the proposed expansion.
According to the petition, the
topography, soils, and climate of the
proposed expansion area are similar to
those of the established Willamette
Valley AVA. The petition states that
both the proposed expansion area and
the established AVA are composed of
rolling hills and valleys between the
Coast Range Mountains to the west and
the Cascade Mountains to the east.
Elevations within the proposed AVA
range from 500 feet to 1,200 feet, which
is within the range of elevations found
in the established AVA. By contrast, the
region outside both the proposed
expansion area and the Willamette
Valley AVA is marked by mountainous
terrain with higher elevations. The
proposed expansion area and the
established AVA are also within the
watersheds of both the Willamette and
the Siuslaw Rivers, whereas the region
to the south of both the proposed
expansion area and the established AVA
drains exclusively into the Umpqua
River.
The petition describes the soils within
both the proposed expansion area and
the Willamette Valley AVA as having a
‘‘xeric’’ moisture regime of soil
classification, meaning that they
typically retain low amounts of
moisture and generally have depleted
their moisture reserves by the end of the
growing season. Common soil series
within both the proposed expansion
area and the established AVA include
Bellpine, Jory, Willakenzie, Dupee, and
Peavine. The petition states that
although Peavine soils are found outside
the proposed expansion area and the
established AVA, other soils such as
Blanchley, Honeygrove Complex,
Bohanon, Preacher, Klickitat, Kirney,
and Digger Complex soils are also
present and are not found in either the
proposed expansion area or the
Willamette Valley AVA. Additionally,
the soils of the surrounding region are
described as having an ‘‘udic’’ moisture
regime of soil classification, meaning
the soils typically retain even amounts
of water throughout the year.
The petition compared the climate of
the proposed expansion area to the
climates of several established AVAs
that are also located within the larger
Willamette Valley AVA, as well as to
the climate of the Umpqua Valley AVA
(27 CFR 9.89), which is adjacent to the
southernmost point of the Willamette
Valley AVA and south of the proposed
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
11112
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
expansion area. The petition shows that
the annual mean temperature, growing
season precipitation amounts, and
growing degree day accumulations
within the proposed expansion area are
slightly lower than those of the AVAs
within the Willamette Valley AVA.
However, the climate data from the
proposed expansion area is more similar
to the climate data from the AVAs
located within the Willamette Valley
AVA than to the climate data from the
Umpqua Valley AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 152 in the
Federal Register on June 18, 2015 (80
FR 34864), proposing to expand the
Willamette Valley AVA. In the
document, TTB summarized the
evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing
features for the proposed expansion
area. For a detailed description of the
evidence relating to the name,
boundary, and distinguishing features of
the proposed expansion area, and for a
comparison of the distinguishing
features of the proposed expansion area
to the surrounding areas and to the
established Willamette Valley AVA, see
Notice No. 152.
In Notice No. 152, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. The comment period closed on
August 17, 2015. TTB received two
comments in response to Notice No.
152. The first comment (Comment 1)
did not directly address the proposed
expansion of the Willamette Valley
AVA and, instead, issued a general
caution against establishing too many
AVAs in any given area, as rapid or
uncontrolled growth may cause longterm harm to the economy, quality of
life, and agricultural diversity of the
community. TTB considers this
comment to be outside the scope of the
proposed rule.
The second comment (Comment 2)
identified two typographical errors in
the proposed regulatory text of Notice
No. 152. The commenter noted that in
paragraph (c)(17) of the proposed
regulatory text, Oregon State Highway
99 was incorrectly referred to as
Interstate Highway 99. TTB agrees that
the State highway was incorrectly
designated in the proposed regulatory
text, and the correction has been made
in the final rule text. The commenter
also stated that U.S. Highway 26 was
incorrectly identified as Interstate
Highway 26 in redesignated paragraph
(c)(32). Although TTB did not propose
to change the text of redesignated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
paragraph (c)(32) in Notice No. 152, the
commenter is correct that the Federal
highway is improperly designated in
that paragraph as it currently appears in
the Code of Federal Regulations.
Therefore, TTB is also making that edit
in the final rule text of this document.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition
and comments received, TTB finds that
the topography, soil, and climate
evidence provided by the petitioner
sufficiently demonstrates that the
proposed expansion area is similar to
the established Willamette Valley AVA
and should also be recognized as part of
that AVA. Accordingly, under the
authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB
regulations, TTB expands the 5,360square mile ‘‘Willamette Valley’’ AVA
to include the approximately 29-square
mile expansion area as described in
Notice No. 152, effective 30 days from
the publication date of this document.
In the regulatory text of this final rule,
TTB is also correcting a typographical
error that appeared in proposed
paragraph (c)(17) and a second
typographical error that was identified
by a commenter in redesignated
paragraph (c)(32). These corrections will
properly identify two roads as a State
highway and a Federal highway,
respectively. No other changes have
been made to the regulatory text.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA expansion in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance, and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
The expansion of the Willamette
Valley AVA will not affect any other
existing AVA, and bottlers using
‘‘Willamette Valley’’ as an appellation of
origin or in a brand name for wines
made from grapes within the established
Willamette Valley AVA will not be
affected by this expansion. The
expansion will allow vintners to use
‘‘Willamette Valley’’ as an appellation of
origin for wines made primarily from
grapes grown within the expansion area
if the wines meet the eligibility
requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Section 9.90 is amended by revising
paragraph (b) introductory text, adding
paragraph (b)(4), removing paragraphs
(c)(11) through (13), redesignating
paragraphs (c)(14) through (32) as
paragraphs (c)(18) through (36), revising
newly redesignated paragraph (c)(32),
and adding paragraphs (c)(11) through
(17) to read as follows:
■
§ 9.90
Willamette Valley.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Approved maps. The approved
maps for determining the boundaries of
the Willamette Valley viticultural area
are three U.S.G.S. Oregon maps scaled
1:250,000 and one U.S.G.S. Oregon map
scaled 1:24,000. They are entitled:
*
*
*
*
*
(4) ‘‘Letz Creek, OR’’ (revised 1984).
(c) * * *
(11) Northeast, then southeast along
the 1,000 foot contour line
approximately 12 miles to its
intersection with the R5W/R6W range
line;
(12) South along the R5W/R6W range
line approximately 0.25 mile to the
intersection with the 1,000 foot contour
line;
(13) Generally southeast along the
meandering 1,000 foot contour line,
crossing onto the Letz Creek map, to a
point on the 1,000 foot contour line
located due north of the intersection of
Siuslaw River Road and Fire Road;
(14) South in a straight line
approximately 0.55 mile, crossing over
the Siuslaw River and the intersection
of Siuslaw River Road and Fire Road, to
the 1,000 foot contour line;
(15) Generally southeast along the
meandering 1,000 foot contour line,
crossing onto the Roseburg, Oregon
map, to the intersection of the 1,000 foot
contour line with the Lane/Douglas
County line;
(16) East along the Lane/Douglas
County line approximately 3.8 miles to
the intersection with the 1,000 foot
contour line just east of the South Fork
of the Siuslaw River;
(17) Generally north, then northeast
along the 1,000 foot contour line around
Spencer Butte, and then generally south
to a point along the Lane/Douglas
County line 0.5 mile north of State
Highway 99;
*
*
*
*
*
(32) North along R5E/R6E 10.5 miles
to a point where it intersects the Mount
Hood National Forest boundary
(approximately three miles north of U.S.
Highway 26);
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
Signed: February 8, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: February 11, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–04710 Filed 3–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2015–0009; T.D. TTB–135;
Ref: Notice No. 153]
RIN 1513–AC20
Establishment of the Loess Hills
District Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 12,897-square mile
‘‘Loess Hills District’’ viticultural area in
western Iowa and northwestern
Missouri. This new viticultural area is
not located within any other viticultural
area. TTB designates viticultural areas
to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective April
4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11113
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (dated
December 10, 2013, superseding
Treasury Order 120–01 (Revised),
‘‘Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau,’’ dated January 24, 2003), to the
TTB Administrator to perform the
functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of these
laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions for the
establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must
include the following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11110-11113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2015-0008; T.D. TTB-134; Ref: Notice No. 152]
RIN 1513-AC21
Expansion of the Willamette Valley Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is
expanding the approximately 5,360-square mile ``Willamette Valley''
viticultural area in northwestern Oregon, by approximately 29 square
miles. Neither the established viticultural area nor the expansion area
is located within any other established viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the
origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines
they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective April 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer
[[Page 11111]]
deception and the use of misleading statements on labels and ensure
that labels provide the consumer with adequate information as to the
identity and quality of the product. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d)
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various authorities through Treasury Department
Order 120-01 (dated December 10, 2013, superseding Treasury Order 120-
01 (Revised), ``Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,'' dated
January 24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions
and duties in the administration and enforcement of these laws.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth the standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for
the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs)
and lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Petitioners may use the same process to request changes
involving established AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an established AVA must include the
following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area
boundary is nationally or locally known by the name of the established
AVA;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed expansion area;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
expansion area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the
boundary of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion
area boundary based on USGS map markings.
Petition to Expand the Willamette Valley AVA
TTB received a petition from Steve Thomson, the executive vice
president of King Estate Winery in Eugene, Oregon, proposing to expand
the established ``Willamette Valley'' AVA in northwestern Oregon. The
Willamette Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.90) was established by T.D. ATF-162,
which was published in the Federal Register on December 1, 1983 (48 FR
54221). The Willamette Valley AVA covers approximately 5,360 square
miles in Benton, Lane, Linn, Clackamas, Lincoln, Marion, Multnomah,
Polk, Tillamook, Washington, and Yamhill Counties. Neither the proposed
expansion area nor the established AVA are located within any other
established AVA.
The proposed expansion area is located in Lane County and is
adjacent to the southern tip of the established Willamette Valley AVA
boundary and covers approximately 29 square miles. The King Estate
Winery operates one of the two commercial vineyards that cover a total
of 508 acres within the proposed expansion area, and provided
information that the second vineyard owner also supports the proposed
expansion. The King Estate Winery and the second vineyard each have a
winery within the proposed expansion area. A third winery is also
included in the proposed expansion area; however, it does not operate a
vineyard within the proposed expansion area. The vineyards and wineries
did not exist at the time the Willamette Valley AVA was established in
1983 and currently are not within any AVA. The petition included
letters from the president of the Willamette Valley Wineries
Association and the president of the Oregon Winegrowers Association in
support of the proposed expansion.
According to the petition, the topography, soils, and climate of
the proposed expansion area are similar to those of the established
Willamette Valley AVA. The petition states that both the proposed
expansion area and the established AVA are composed of rolling hills
and valleys between the Coast Range Mountains to the west and the
Cascade Mountains to the east. Elevations within the proposed AVA range
from 500 feet to 1,200 feet, which is within the range of elevations
found in the established AVA. By contrast, the region outside both the
proposed expansion area and the Willamette Valley AVA is marked by
mountainous terrain with higher elevations. The proposed expansion area
and the established AVA are also within the watersheds of both the
Willamette and the Siuslaw Rivers, whereas the region to the south of
both the proposed expansion area and the established AVA drains
exclusively into the Umpqua River.
The petition describes the soils within both the proposed expansion
area and the Willamette Valley AVA as having a ``xeric'' moisture
regime of soil classification, meaning that they typically retain low
amounts of moisture and generally have depleted their moisture reserves
by the end of the growing season. Common soil series within both the
proposed expansion area and the established AVA include Bellpine, Jory,
Willakenzie, Dupee, and Peavine. The petition states that although
Peavine soils are found outside the proposed expansion area and the
established AVA, other soils such as Blanchley, Honeygrove Complex,
Bohanon, Preacher, Klickitat, Kirney, and Digger Complex soils are also
present and are not found in either the proposed expansion area or the
Willamette Valley AVA. Additionally, the soils of the surrounding
region are described as having an ``udic'' moisture regime of soil
classification, meaning the soils typically retain even amounts of
water throughout the year.
The petition compared the climate of the proposed expansion area to
the climates of several established AVAs that are also located within
the larger Willamette Valley AVA, as well as to the climate of the
Umpqua Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.89), which is adjacent to the southernmost
point of the Willamette Valley AVA and south of the proposed
[[Page 11112]]
expansion area. The petition shows that the annual mean temperature,
growing season precipitation amounts, and growing degree day
accumulations within the proposed expansion area are slightly lower
than those of the AVAs within the Willamette Valley AVA. However, the
climate data from the proposed expansion area is more similar to the
climate data from the AVAs located within the Willamette Valley AVA
than to the climate data from the Umpqua Valley AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 152 in the Federal Register on June 18,
2015 (80 FR 34864), proposing to expand the Willamette Valley AVA. In
the document, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding
the name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed
expansion area. For a detailed description of the evidence relating to
the name, boundary, and distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area, and for a comparison of the distinguishing features of
the proposed expansion area to the surrounding areas and to the
established Willamette Valley AVA, see Notice No. 152.
In Notice No. 152, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. The comment period closed on August 17, 2015.
TTB received two comments in response to Notice No. 152. The first
comment (Comment 1) did not directly address the proposed expansion of
the Willamette Valley AVA and, instead, issued a general caution
against establishing too many AVAs in any given area, as rapid or
uncontrolled growth may cause long-term harm to the economy, quality of
life, and agricultural diversity of the community. TTB considers this
comment to be outside the scope of the proposed rule.
The second comment (Comment 2) identified two typographical errors
in the proposed regulatory text of Notice No. 152. The commenter noted
that in paragraph (c)(17) of the proposed regulatory text, Oregon State
Highway 99 was incorrectly referred to as Interstate Highway 99. TTB
agrees that the State highway was incorrectly designated in the
proposed regulatory text, and the correction has been made in the final
rule text. The commenter also stated that U.S. Highway 26 was
incorrectly identified as Interstate Highway 26 in redesignated
paragraph (c)(32). Although TTB did not propose to change the text of
redesignated paragraph (c)(32) in Notice No. 152, the commenter is
correct that the Federal highway is improperly designated in that
paragraph as it currently appears in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Therefore, TTB is also making that edit in the final rule text of this
document.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition and comments received, TTB
finds that the topography, soil, and climate evidence provided by the
petitioner sufficiently demonstrates that the proposed expansion area
is similar to the established Willamette Valley AVA and should also be
recognized as part of that AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations, TTB expands the 5,360-square mile
``Willamette Valley'' AVA to include the approximately 29-square mile
expansion area as described in Notice No. 152, effective 30 days from
the publication date of this document.
In the regulatory text of this final rule, TTB is also correcting a
typographical error that appeared in proposed paragraph (c)(17) and a
second typographical error that was identified by a commenter in
redesignated paragraph (c)(32). These corrections will properly
identify two roads as a State highway and a Federal highway,
respectively. No other changes have been made to the regulatory text.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA expansion
in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec.
4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is
not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in compliance, and the bottler must
change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if
the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986.
See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for
details.
The expansion of the Willamette Valley AVA will not affect any
other existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Willamette Valley'' as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name for wines made from grapes
within the established Willamette Valley AVA will not be affected by
this expansion. The expansion will allow vintners to use ``Willamette
Valley'' as an appellation of origin for wines made primarily from
grapes grown within the expansion area if the wines meet the
eligibility requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
[[Page 11113]]
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Section 9.90 is amended by revising paragraph (b) introductory text,
adding paragraph (b)(4), removing paragraphs (c)(11) through (13),
redesignating paragraphs (c)(14) through (32) as paragraphs (c)(18)
through (36), revising newly redesignated paragraph (c)(32), and adding
paragraphs (c)(11) through (17) to read as follows:
Sec. 9.90 Willamette Valley.
* * * * *
(b) Approved maps. The approved maps for determining the boundaries
of the Willamette Valley viticultural area are three U.S.G.S. Oregon
maps scaled 1:250,000 and one U.S.G.S. Oregon map scaled 1:24,000. They
are entitled:
* * * * *
(4) ``Letz Creek, OR'' (revised 1984).
(c) * * *
(11) Northeast, then southeast along the 1,000 foot contour line
approximately 12 miles to its intersection with the R5W/R6W range line;
(12) South along the R5W/R6W range line approximately 0.25 mile to
the intersection with the 1,000 foot contour line;
(13) Generally southeast along the meandering 1,000 foot contour
line, crossing onto the Letz Creek map, to a point on the 1,000 foot
contour line located due north of the intersection of Siuslaw River
Road and Fire Road;
(14) South in a straight line approximately 0.55 mile, crossing
over the Siuslaw River and the intersection of Siuslaw River Road and
Fire Road, to the 1,000 foot contour line;
(15) Generally southeast along the meandering 1,000 foot contour
line, crossing onto the Roseburg, Oregon map, to the intersection of
the 1,000 foot contour line with the Lane/Douglas County line;
(16) East along the Lane/Douglas County line approximately 3.8
miles to the intersection with the 1,000 foot contour line just east of
the South Fork of the Siuslaw River;
(17) Generally north, then northeast along the 1,000 foot contour
line around Spencer Butte, and then generally south to a point along
the Lane/Douglas County line 0.5 mile north of State Highway 99;
* * * * *
(32) North along R5E/R6E 10.5 miles to a point where it intersects
the Mount Hood National Forest boundary (approximately three miles
north of U.S. Highway 26);
* * * * *
Signed: February 8, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: February 11, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-04710 Filed 3-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P