Freedom of Information Act Regulations, 11124-11131 [2016-04647]
Download as PDF
11124
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions.
Time-limited tolerances specified in the
following table are established for
residues of the nematicide fluensulfone,
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in
the table below, resulting from use of
the pesticide pursuant to FIFRA section
18 emergency exemptions. Compliance
with the tolerance levels specified
below is to be determined by measuring
only 3,4,4-trifluoro-but-3-ene-1-sulfonic
acid. The tolerances expire on the date
specified in the table.
Parts per
million
Commodity
Carrot ..................
*
*
*
2.0
*
Expiration
date
12/31/17
*
[FR Doc. 2016–04757 Filed 3–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 2
[13XD4523WS DS10200000
DWSN00000.000000 WBS DP10202]
RIN 1093–AA19
Freedom of Information Act
Regulations
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This rule revises the
regulations that the Department of the
Interior (Department) follows in
processing records under the Freedom
of Information Act. The revisions clarify
and update procedures for requesting
information from the Department and
procedures that the Department follows
in responding to requests from the
public.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on April 4,
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Cafaro, Office of the Executive
Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs, 202–
208–5342.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
I. Why We’re Publishing This Rule and
What it Does
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.680, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
*
DATES:
Dated: February 25, 2016.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
§ 180.680 Fluensulfone; tolerances for
residues.
Jkt 238001
A. Introduction
In late 2012, the Department
published a final rule updating and
replacing the Department’s previous
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulations. Since that time, in order to
maintain the independence of the Office
of Inspector General (OIG), the
Department and the OIG have agreed to
authorize the OIG to process their own
FOIA appeals. Additionally, the
Department has recently migrated its
Web site to a new framework, leading to
updated links. Finally, the Department
has received feedback from its FOIA
practitioners and requesters and
identified areas where it is possible to
further update, clarify, and streamline
the language of some procedural
provisions. Therefore, the Department is
making the following changes:
• Section 2.1(e) is amended to
identify the regulations applicable to
Privacy Act requests.
• Section 2.5(d) is amended to
provide more guidance on what
happens when a request does not
reasonably describe the records sought.
• Portions of § 2.6 are amended to
make explicit that a fee waiver request
is a valid way of responding to a request
for additional fee information and that
requesters may inform bureaus why
they believe they are eligible for
discretionary fee waivers, and to
emphasize when fee issues must be
resolved before processing will begin.
• A sentence is added to § 2.8(a) to
require a bureau that cannot readily
reproduce the requested record in the
form or format requested to explain why
it cannot.
• Section 2.9(b) is amended to
remove a superfluous introductory
phrase.
• Section 2.10 is amended to
highlight the requirements a requester
seeking expedited processing must meet
and the consequences of not meeting
those requirements.
• Section 2.11 is amended to reduce
the suggested contact information
provided by requesters.
• Section 2.12(c) is amended to
emphasize that reasonable efforts must
be made to search for requested records
and to clarify when searching for
requested records in electronic form or
format will not occur.
• A sentence is added to § 2.15(e) to
require bureaus to provide more
information to requesters when placing
them in a different processing track than
requested.
• Section 2.16(a) is amended to
clarify and streamline discussion of
when the time period for responding to
a request begins and ends.
• The introductory language of
§ 2.19(a) is amended to clarify when
bureaus may extend the basic time limit.
• Portions of § 2.20 are amended to
make explicit that expedited processing
requests are only appropriate before the
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
bureau issues its final response; to
require bureaus to provide more
information to requesters when denying
expedited processing requests; and to
clarify that the portion of an appeal that
relates to an expedited processing
denial, rather than the entire appeal,
will be processed ahead of other
appeals.
• Section 2.22(c) and (d) is amended
to clarify when records may be released
to requesters.
• Section 2.23(a)(3) is amended to
add a clarifying phrase.
• Section 2.24(b) is amended and
expanded to require bureaus to provide
more information to requesters in denial
notifications.
• Section 2.25(c) is amended to
clarify what information must be
provided to requesters, and where,
when portions of responsive records
have been deleted.
• Section 2.26 and § 2.27(a) are
amended to provide more information
on when submitter notification is
required.
• One word in § 2.27(b) is replaced to
more closely track the language of
Executive Order No. 12600, (52 FR
23781, published June 23, 1987).
• Section 2.28(a) is amended to
clarify that a general description of the
request would suffice for submitter
notices published under § 2.27(b).
• Section 2.31(a)(1) and (2) are
amended to clarify the information a
submitter must provide when objecting
to the release of responsive information
under Exemption 4.
• Section 2.37(g) is added and
§ 2.49(a)(1) is amended so the concept
that requesters generally will not be
charged if the fee for processing their
request is less than $50 is introduced
sooner.
• Section 2.37(h) is added to make
the consequences of failure to pay bills
for FOIA-related fees explicit.
• Section 2.37(i) is added to notify
requesters they can seek assistance,
when considering reformulating their
request to meet their needs at a lower
cost, from the bureau’s designated FOIA
contact or FOIA Public Liaison.
• A sentence is added to § 2.38(b) to
require bureaus to provide more
information to requesters when placing
them in a different fee category than
requested.
• Section 2.39 is amended to replace
one word for the sake of grammatical
consistency.
• Section 2.42(d) is amended to
further discuss the impact of requester
preferences for paper and/or electronic
formats.
• Section 2.44(b) is amended to
provide different examples of special
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
services a requester might have to pay
for.
• The introductory language of
§§ 2.45(a) and 2.48(a) is amended to
clarify what a requester must
demonstrate to be entitled to a fee
waiver.
• Section 2.46(b) is amended to
clarify when fee waiver requests may be
made.
• Minor grammatical changes are
made to § 2.47(a), (c), and (d) to allow
a new § 2.47(e) to increase clarity and
require bureaus to provide the requester
with notice of anticipated fees when
denying a request for a fee waiver.
• Section 2.48(a)(2)(v) is amended to
note that representatives of the news
media will be presumed to have the
ability and intent to disseminate the
requested information to a reasonably
broad audience of persons interested in
the subject.
• Section 2.49(c) is amended to allow
requesters more flexibility in resolving
fee issues.
• Portions of § 2.50 are amended to
clarify discussion of advance payments.
• Section 2.51(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), and
(c) are amended to ensure consistent
phrasing and to include minor,
clarifying additions.
• Section 2.57(a)(5) and (a)(6) are
amended to include minor, clarifying
additions.
• Section 2.60 is amended to reflect
that the FOIA Appeals Officer would no
longer be the deciding official for FOIA
appeals arising from OIG FOIA
responses, and small portions of
§§ 2.20(c), 2.24(b)(5), 2.47(d), 2.62, and
2.63 would also be amended to reflect
this change.
• Section 2.62 is streamlined to
follow the requirements of FOIA more
closely.
• Section 2.66 is amended to provide
more information on the role played by
FOIA Public Liaisons.
• Section 2.68 is amended to reflect
the new schedule number resulting from
the National Archives and Records
Administration’s recent update to the
General Records Schedule pertaining to
FOIA records and to add a reference to
the Department’s Record Schedule
pertaining to FOIA records.
• A word is added to the definition of
‘‘multitrack processing’’ in Section 2.70
to ensure it is consistent with Section
2.14.
• Sections 2.1(d), 2.1(g), 2.3(c),
2.21(a), 2.41(c), 2.59(a), 2.65, and 2.70
are amended to reflect updated Web site
links.
On September 30, 2015, the
Department published a proposed rule
in the Federal Register (80 FR 58663)
and requested comments over a 60-day
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11125
period ending on November 30, 2015.
All comments received were considered
in drafting this final rule.
B. Discussion of Comments
Four commenters responded to the
invitation for comments, including one
commenter from a subcomponent of a
Federal agency and three commenters
from non-Federal sources. Two of these
commenters offered some substantive
suggestions on specific existing
provisions of the rule that are not being
amended; these suggestions are outside
the scope of this rulemaking and are not
addressed below. While most of the
commenters generally supported the
proposed changes (and one
‘‘applaud[ed]’’ certain existing
provisions), they identified twelve
specific issues or recommendations
related to the proposed rule, which the
Department addressed as follows:
The Final Rule Should Only Allow
Requests for Clarification To Be Sent by
Email or Registered Mail
One commenter suggested that
§ 2.5(d) be amended to require requests
for clarification be sent only via email
or registered mail so the agency can
‘‘satisfy itself that the request for
additional material that was sent was
actually received.’’ The Department has
not adopted this suggestion as it is
satisfied with the current flexibility in
this area and does not want to create
additional expenses and inflexibility.
The Final Rule Should Specify
Response Deadlines for Responding to
Requests for More Information on the
Records Sought
One commenter suggested that
§ 2.5(d) ‘‘should clarify whether the
requester’s 20-workday response
deadline runs from the date of the
Department’s notice or from the date
that the requester actually receives the
Department’s notice.’’ We agree and
have modified our edits to this section
accordingly and have made analogous
edits and clarifications to §§ 2.49(c),
2.51(b)(1), 2.51(b)(2), 2.51(b)(3), and
2.51(c).
The Final Rule Should Add New
Information About How Fee Information
Affects the Processing of Requests
One commenter suggested § 2.6(e)
include a statement that ‘‘A denial of
your waiver request and/or the amount
you are willing to pay, will result in an
automatic truncation of the process to
comply with your FOIA request.’’ We do
not agree with this statement, as it is not
always true, and therefore have not
adopted this suggestion. Another
commenter suggested the Department
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
11126
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
revisit § 2.6(e) and provided examples of
Department of Justice guidance on fee
issues from 1983 and 2013. In response
to this comment, the Department
reviewed both the suggested guidance
and the Department of Justice’s FOIA
regulations (amended in 2015) and
added clarifying information to § 2.6(e)
consistent with the Department of
Justice’s FOIA regulations.
The Final Rule Should Include
Additional Language Related to
Expedited Processing and Fees
One commenter suggested adding
language to §§ 2.10 and 2.20 explicitly
stating that expedited requests do not
incur additional fees. We understand
the point of this suggestion, but feel it
would not add clarity to the rule,
especially as there is nothing in any
section of the regulations that indicates
making such a request would incur
additional fees.
The Final Rule Should Explicitly Solicit
Cellphone Numbers
One commenter suggested adding a
specific reference to cellphone numbers
to § 2.11. The Department has not
adopted this suggestion. The existing
reference to ‘‘daytime telephone
numbers’’ that encompasses, but does
not require, cellphone numbers, is
sufficient.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Final Rule Should Be Fair to the
Requester
One commenter suggested that the
last sentence of § 2.12(c) ‘‘is not fair to
the requester’’ and suggests it will be
used in bad faith. The language in
question is drawn from the Freedom of
Information Act itself, and we believe it
is fair; therefore this language has not
been changed.
The Final Rule Should Add a Reference
to FOIA Public Liaisons to the Section
on Basic Time Limits
One commenter suggested adding
information on seeking estimated
completion dates from FOIA Public
Liaisons to § 2.16(a), which explains the
basic concept of basic time limits for
responding to requests. This suggestion
does not seem to fit in this provision
and would be confusing. We therefore
decline to adopt it. Another commenter
suggested that the language in § 2.16(a)
was imprecise. We have carefully
considered this suggestion, but believe
the existing language is clear.
The Final Rule’s Requester Fee Category
Discussion Should Discuss Appeals
One commenter suggested § 2.38(b)
specifically discuss whether the
decision that the requester belongs in a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
specific category can be appealed. Our
proposed modifications to § 2.57(a)(5)
already do this very thing, so we decline
to adopt this change.
The Final Rule Should Clarify What
Fees for Other Services Requesters Will
Not Have To Pay
Two commenters had suggestions
concerning § 2.44(b). One commenter
suggested noting that ‘‘conducting a
search that requires the creation of a
new computer search program’’ does not
include extracting and compiling the
data from an existing database using a
query. As the rule is explicit that it
applies only to locating records, we
have not adopted this suggestion.
Another commenter suggested that this
provision explicitly exclude fees
covered under § 2.42(d). As this section
applies to requests for records in forms
or formats that we don’t already
maintain, we have not adopted this
suggestion.
The Final Rule Should Not Be Vague
One commenter stated § 2.46(b) was
‘‘vague’’ and wondered: ‘‘How can one
know when the bureau has not
completed processing a request? There
should be a specific period (no of days),
after which it is reasonable to expect
that the agency is complying with the
request, and therefore a fee waiver
request would be too late. In such a
situation, if without a fee waiver the
requester would opt for the request to be
stopped, then there would not have
been any man-hours already expended
on fulfilling the request.’’ This
commenter therefore suggested § 2.46(b)
should include ‘‘a specific period (no of
days), after which it is reasonable to
expect that the agency is complying
with the request and therefore a fee
waiver request would be too late.’’ We
believe that § 2.46(b) is not vague and
provides requesters with as much
flexibility in providing fee waiver
requests as possible. We therefore
decline to adopt this change, as it would
negatively affect future requesters.
The Final Rule Should Limit
Modifications of Requests Related to
Advanced Fees
One commenter suggested appending
‘‘if you deem the adjudged fee to be
beyond your means’’ at the end of
§ 2.50(c) because someone might reach
some conclusion ‘‘that once an advance
payment requirement is determined,
then it follows that the requester is
presumed unable to afford it.’’ We
decline to adopt this change; we have
deliberately given requesters the
opportunity to modify their request
even if they could pay the advance
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
payment and we make no presumptions
about a requester will be able to afford
the advance payment.
No Rule Should ‘‘Deny an Individual
From Obtaining Personal Information
About Themselves’’
One commenter’s entire comment
was: ‘‘There must be no rules created
that will deny an individual from
obtaining personal information about
themselves.’’ No changes have been
made to the rule based on this general
statement.
C. Technical and Procedural Comments
One commenter noted National
Archives and Records Administration’s
recent update to the General Records
Schedule pertaining to FOIA records
resulted in a new schedule number. We
have confirmed this and § 2.68 has been
amended accordingly. Additionally, we
have slightly amended § 2.25(c) to more
closely track the language of the FOIA
itself. Additionally, the Department
made very minor clarifications in
§§ 2.6(d), 2.11, 2.20(g), 2.48(b), and 2.60.
In the interests of clarity and
consistency, the Department also added
phrases to the introductory text of
§ 2.6(b), a sentence to § 2.6(d), phrases
to § 2.10, and phrases to §§ 2.48(a)(2)(v)
and 2.48(b). Also in the interests of
clarity and consistency, the Department
added and deleted phrases from §§ 2.26,
2.27(a), and 2.47(d). Finally, upon
further consideration, the Department
has decided against amending § 2.50(a)
and (b).
II. Compliance With Laws and
Executive Orders
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs will review all
significant rules. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
relationship between the Federal and
state governments. A federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this rule does not
unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of the Executive Order.
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Under the FOIA,
agencies may recover only the direct
costs of searching for, reviewing, and
duplicating the records processed for
requesters. Thus, fees assessed by the
Department are nominal. Further, the
‘‘small entities’’ that make FOIA
requests, as compared with individual
requesters and other requesters, are
relatively few in number.
3. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804(2), the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. This
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement. It would not
substantially and directly affect the
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated this rule and
determined that it has no potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes. This rule does not have tribal
implications that impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal
governments.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq) is not required. We may not
conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
10. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required. Pursuant to
Department Manual 516 DM 2.3A(2),
Section 1.10 of 516 DM 2, Appendix 1
excludes from documentation in an
environmental assessment or impact
statement ‘‘policies, directives,
regulations and guidelines of an
administrative, financial, legal,
technical or procedural nature; or the
environmental effects of which are too
broad, speculative or conjectural to lend
themselves to meaningful analysis and
will be subject late to the NEPA process,
either collectively or case-by-case.’’
11. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required. This rule will not
have a significant effect on the nation’s
energy supply, distribution, or use.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11127
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2
Freedom of information.
Kristen J. Sarri,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Policy, Management, and Budget.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the Interior
amends part 2 of title 43 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 2—FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31
U.S.C. 3717; 43 U.S.C. 1460, 1461.
Subpart A—Introduction
2. Amend § 2.1:
a. In paragraph (d), the second
sentence, by removing the Web site
address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/
guidance.cfm’’ and adding in its place
the Web site address ‘‘https://
www.doi.gov/foia/news/guidance’’;
■ b. By revising paragraph (e); and
■ c. In paragraph (g), the first sentence,
by removing the Web site address
‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/libraries.cfm’’
and adding in its place the Web site
address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/
libraries’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
§ 2.1
What should you know up front?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The Department’s regulations for
requests made under the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are located at
subpart K of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—How To Make a Request
§ 2.3—[Amended]
3. Amend § 2.3(c), the second
sentence, by:
■ a. Removing the Web site address
‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/index.cfm’’
and adding in its place the Web site
address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia’’; and
■ b. Removing the Web site address
‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts.cfm’’
and adding in its place the Web site
address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/
contacts’’.
■ 4. In § 2.5, revise paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
■
§ 2.5 How should you describe the records
you seek?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If the bureau determines that your
request does not reasonably describe the
records sought, the bureau will inform
you what additional information you
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
11128
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
need to provide in order to reasonably
describe the records that you seek so the
requested records can be located with a
reasonable amount of effort. The bureau
will also notify you that it will not be
able to comply with your request unless
the additional information it has
requested is received from you in
writing within 20 workdays after the
bureau has requested it and that you
may appeal its determination. If you
receive this type of notification, you
may wish to discuss it with the bureau’s
designated FOIA contact or its FOIA
Public Liaison (see § 2.66 of this part).
If the bureau does not receive your
written response containing the
additional information within 20
workdays after the bureau has requested
it, the bureau will presume that you are
no longer interested in the records and
will close the file on the request.
■ 5. Amend § 2.6 by revising paragraph
(b) introductory text and paragraphs
(b)(3), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
§ 2.6 How will fee information affect the
processing of your request?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) If the bureau anticipates that the
fees for processing the request will
exceed the amount you have agreed to
pay, or if you did not agree in writing
to pay processing fees or request a fee
waiver and the bureau anticipates the
processing costs will exceed $50 (see
§ 2.37(g) of this part) or will exceed your
entitlements (see § 2.39 of this part), the
bureau will notify you:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) That it will not be able to fully
comply with your request unless you
provide a fee waiver request and/or the
requested written assurance or advance
payment.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If you are seeking a fee waiver,
your request must include a justification
that addresses and meets the criteria in
§§ 2.45 and 2.48 of this part. Failure to
provide sufficient justification will
result in a denial of the fee waiver
request. If you are seeking a fee waiver,
you may also indicate the amount you
are willing to pay if the fee waiver is
denied. This allows the bureau to
process the request for records while it
considers your fee waiver request. You
may also inform us of why you believe
your request meets one or more of the
criteria for a discretionary fee waiver
under § 2.56 of this part.
(e) The bureau will begin processing
your request only after all issues
regarding fees are resolved.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 2.8, add a sentence to the end
of paragraph (a) to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 2.8 Can you ask for records to be
disclosed in a particular form or format?
(a) * * * If the bureau cannot readily
reproduce the record in that form or
format, it must explain why it cannot.
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 2.9, revise paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
■
§ 2.9 What if your request seeks records
about another person?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The bureau can require you to
supply additional information if
necessary to verify that a particular
person has consented to disclosure or is
deceased.
■
8. Revise § 2.10 to read as follows:
§ 2.10 May you ask for the processing of
your request to be expedited?
You may ask for the processing of
your request to be expedited. If you are
seeking expedited processing, your
request must include a justification that
addresses and meets the criteria in
§ 2.20 of this part and includes the
certification required at § 2.20(b)(2) of
this part. Failure to provide sufficient
justification or the required certification
will result in a denial of the expedited
processing request.
■
9. Revise § 2.11 to read as follows:
§ 2.11 What contact information should
your request include?
A request should include your name
and a way (such as a mailing or email
address) for the bureau to send
responsive records to you and/or to
request additional information or
clarification of your request. You may
also wish to include a daytime
telephone number (or the name and
telephone number of an appropriate
contact).
Subpart C—Processing Requests
10. In § 2.12, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 2.12 What should you know about how
bureaus process requests?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The bureau will make reasonable
efforts to search for the requested
records. As part of its reasonable efforts,
the bureau will search paper and/or
electronic records (for example, emails),
as appropriate. The bureau will not
search for records in an electronic form
or format if these efforts would
significantly interfere with the operation
of the bureau’s automated information
system.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subpart D—Timing of Responses to
Requests
11. In § 2.15, add the following
sentence to the end of paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
■
§ 2.15 What is multitrack processing and
how does it affect your request?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * If you request placement in
a particular processing track but the
bureau places you in a different
processing track, the bureau will
provide you with an explanation of why
you were not placed in the processing
track you requested.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. In § 2.16, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 2.16 What is the basic time limit for
responding to a request?
(a) Ordinarily, the bureau has 20
workdays (including the date of receipt)
to determine whether to comply with a
request, but unusual circumstances may
allow the bureau to take longer than 20
workdays (see § 2.19 of this subpart).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. In § 2.19, revise paragraph (a)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 2.19 When may the bureau extend the
basic time limit?
(a) The bureau may extend the basic
time limit, if unusual circumstances
exist, by notifying you in writing of:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. In § 2.20, revise paragraphs (c), (f),
and (g) to read as follows:
§ 2.20 When will expedited processing be
provided and how will it affect your
request?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) You may ask for expedited
processing of your request by writing to
the appropriate FOIA contact in the
bureau that maintains the records
requested any time before the bureau
issues its final response to your request.
When making a request for expedited
processing of an administrative appeal,
submit the request to the appropriate
deciding official for FOIA appeals.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) If expedited processing is denied,
the bureau will:
(1) Inform you of the basis for the
denial, including an explanation of why
the expedited processing request does
not meet the Department’s expedited
processing criteria under this section;
and
(2) Notify you of the right to appeal
the decision on expedited processing in
accordance with the procedures in
subpart H of this part.
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(g) If you appeal the bureau’s
expedited processing decision, that
portion of your appeal (if it is properly
formatted under § 2.59 of this part) will
be processed before appeals that do not
challenge expedited processing
decisions.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart E—Responses to Requests
§ 2.21—[Amended]
15. In § 2.21(a), the second sentence,
remove the Web site address ‘‘https://
www.doi.gov/foia/news/guidance/
index.cfm’’ and add in its place the Web
site address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/
news/guidance’’.
■ 16. Amend § 2.22:
■ a. By revising paragraph (c); and
■ b. In paragraph (d), by adding the
words ‘‘released or’’ after the words ‘‘the
records will be’’.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 2.22
How will bureaus grant requests?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The bureau will release records (or
portions of records) to you promptly
upon payment of any applicable fees (or
before then, at its discretion).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2.23—[Amended]
17. In § 2.23(a)(3), add the words
‘‘and/or control’’ after the words
‘‘bureau’s possession’’.
■ 18. In § 2.24, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 2.24
How will the bureau deny requests?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The denial notification must
include:
(1) The name and title or position of
the person responsible for the denial,
along with an office phone number or
email address;
(2) A statement of the reasons for the
denial;
(3) A reference to any FOIA
exemption applied by the bureau to
withhold records in full or in part;
(4) An estimate of the volume of any
records withheld in full or in part (for
example, by providing the number of
pages or some other reasonable form of
estimation), unless an estimate would
harm an interest protected by an
exemption used to withhold the records;
(5) The name and title of the Office of
the Solicitor or Office of General
Counsel attorney consulted (if the
bureau is denying a fee waiver request
or withholding all or part of a requested
record); and
(6) A statement that the denial may be
appealed under subpart H of this part
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
and a description of the procedures in
subpart H of this part.
■ 19. In § 2.25, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 2.25 What if the requested records
contain both exempt and nonexempt
material?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If technically feasible, indicating
the amount of information deleted and
the FOIA exemption under which the
deletion was made at the place in the
record where the deletion was made.
Subpart F—Handling Confidential
Information
■
20. Revise § 2.26 to read as follows:
§ 2.26 May submitters of possibly
confidential information designate
information as confidential when making
Departmental submissions?
(a) The Department encourages, but
does not require, submitters to designate
confidential information in good faith
(in other words, to identify specific
information as information the
submitter considers protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the
FOIA, found at 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)), at
the time of submission or reasonably
soon thereafter.
(b) The designations discussed in
paragraph (a) of this section assist the
bureau in identifying what information
obtained from the submitter is possibly
confidential and triggers the
requirement for bureau-provided
notifications under § 2.27(a)(1) of this
subpart.
■ 21. Amend § 2.27:
■ a. By revising paragraph (a); and
■ b. In paragraph (b), by removing the
word ‘‘large’’ and adding in its place the
word ‘‘voluminous’’.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 2.27 When will the bureau notify a
submitter of a request for their possibly
confidential information?
(a) Except as outlined in § 2.29 of this
subpart, a bureau must promptly notify
a submitter in writing when it receives
a FOIA request if:
(1) The requested information has
been designated by the submitter as
confidential information under § 2.26(a)
of this subpart; or
(2) The requested information has not
been designated as confidential
information by the submitter under
§ 2.26(a) of this subpart, but the bureau
identifies it as possibly confidential
information.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. In § 2.28, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11129
§ 2.28 What information will the bureau
include when it notifies a submitter of a
request for their possibly confidential
information?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Either a copy of the request, the
exact language of the request, or (for
notices published under § 2.27(b) of this
subpart) a general description of the
request;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. In § 2.31, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2) to read as follows:
§ 2.31 What must a submitter include in a
detailed Exemption 4 objection statement?
(a) * * *
(1) Whether the submitter provided
the information voluntarily and, if so,
how disclosure will impair the
Government’s ability to obtain similar
information in the future and/or how
the information fits into a category of
information that the submitter does not
customarily release to the public;
(2) Whether the Government required
the information to be submitted, and if
so, how disclosure will impair the
Government’s ability to obtain similar
information in the future and/or how
substantial competitive or other
business harm would likely result from
disclosure; and
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—Fees
24. In § 2.37, add paragraphs (g), (h),
and (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 2.37
fees?
What general principles govern
*
*
*
*
*
(g) If the fee for processing your
request is less than $50, you will not be
charged unless multiple requests are
aggregated under § 2.54 of this subpart
to an amount that is $50 or more.
(h) If you fail to pay any FOIA-related
fee within 30 calendar days of the date
of billing, the processing of any new or
ongoing requests and/or appeals from
you shall ordinarily be suspended.
(i) If you would like to reformulate
your request so it will meet your needs
at a lower cost, you may wish to seek
assistance from the bureau’s designated
FOIA contact or its FOIA Public Liaison
(see § 2.66 of this part).
■ 25. In § 2.38, add the following
sentence to the end of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 2.38 What are the requester fee
categories?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * If you request placement in
a particular fee category but the bureau
places you in a different fee category,
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
11130
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the bureau will provide you with an
explanation of why you were not placed
in the fee category you requested (for
example, if you were placed in the
commercial use requester category
rather than the category you requested,
the bureau will describe how the
records would further your commercial,
trade, or profit interests).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2.39—[Amended]
26. In the table at § 2.39(a), remove the
word ‘‘non-commercial’’ and add in its
place the word ‘‘noncommercial’’.
■
§ 2.41—[Amended]
27. In § 2.41(c), remove the Web site
address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/feeswaivers.cfm’’ and add in its place the
Web site address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/
foia/fees-waivers’’.
■ 28. In § 2.42, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
§ 2.42 What duplication fees will you have
to pay?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If the bureau must scan paper
records to accommodate your preference
to receive records in an electronic
format or print electronic records to
accommodate your preference to receive
records in a paper format, you will pay
both the per page amount noted in
Appendix A to this part and the time
spent by personnel scanning or printing
the requested records. For each quarter
hour spent by personnel scanning or
printing the requested records, the fees
will be the same as those charged for a
search under § 2.41(b) of this subpart.
■ 29. In § 2.44, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 2.44 What fees for other services will you
have to pay?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Examples of these services include
providing multiple copies of the same
record, converting records that are not
already maintained in a requested
format to the requested format,
obtaining research data under § 2.69 of
this part, sending records by means
other than first class mail, and
conducting a search that requires the
creation of a new computer search
program to locate the requested records.
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 2.45—[Amended]
30. In § 2.45, in paragraph (a)
introductory text, remove the words
‘‘under the factors’’ and add in their
place the words ‘‘by addressing and
meeting each of the criteria’’.
■ 31. In § 2.46, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 2.46 When may you ask the bureau for a
fee waiver?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) You may submit a fee waiver
request at a later time if the bureau has
not yet completed processing your
request.
■ 32. Amend § 2.47:
■ a. In paragraph (a), by removing the
period at the end of the paragraph and
adding in its place a semicolon;
■ b. In paragraph (c), by removing the
word ‘‘and’’ at the end of the paragraph;
■ c. In paragraph (d), by removing the
words ‘‘to the FOIA Appeals Officer,
under the procedures in § 2.57 of this
part, within 30 workdays after’’ and
adding in their place the words ‘‘under
subpart H of this part and a description
of the requirements set forth therein,
within 30 workdays from’’ and
removing the period at the end of the
paragraph and adding in its place the
word ‘‘; and’’; and
■ d. Adding paragraph (e).
■ The addition reads as follows:
§ 2.47 How will the bureau notify you if it
denies your fee waiver request?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Your anticipated fees, in
accordance with § 2.49 of this subpart.
■ 33. Amend § 2.48 by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (a)(2)(v) to read as follows: ‘‘’’
§ 2.48 How will the bureau evaluate your
fee waiver request?
(a) In deciding whether your fee
waiver request meets the requirements
of § 2.45(a)(1) of this subpart, the bureau
will consider the criteria listed in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this
section. You must address and meet
each of these criteria in order to
demonstrate that you are entitled to a
fee waiver.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(v) * * * If we have categorized you
as a representative of the news media
under § 2.38, we will presume you have
this ability and intent.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 34. In § 2.49, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c) to read as follows:
§ 2.49 When will you be notified of
anticipated fees?
(a) * * *
(1) The anticipated fee is less than $50
(see § 2.37(g) of this subpart).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If the bureau does not receive your
written response containing the
additional information that resolves any
fee issues, in accordance with
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
paragraphs (b)(2) and/or (b)(4) of this
section, within 20 workdays after the
bureau has requested it, the bureau will
presume that you are no longer
interested in the records and will close
the file on the request.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 35. In § 2.50, revise paragraphs (c) and
(d) to read as follows:
§ 2.50 When will the bureau require
advance payment?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) When the bureau notifies you that
an advance payment is due under
paragraph (a) of this section, it will give
you an opportunity to reduce the fee by
modifying the request.
(d) Your payment of the funds you
owe the bureau for work it has already
completed before records are sent to you
is not an advance payment under
paragraph (a) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 2.51—[Amended]
36. Amend § 2.51:
a. In paragraph (b)(1), by adding the
words ‘‘after the bureau has requested
the additional clarification’’ after the
words ‘‘within 20 workdays’’;
■ b. In paragraph (b)(2), by adding the
words ‘‘after the bureau has requested
the additional clarification’’ after the
words ‘‘within 20 workdays’’;
■ c. In paragraph (b)(3), by removing the
words ‘‘hears from you within 20
workdays’’ and add in their place the
words ‘‘receives a written response from
you within 20 workdays after the bureau
has requested the additional
clarification’’; and
■ d. In paragraph (c), by adding the
words ‘‘after the bureau has requested
the additional clarification’’ after the
words ‘‘within 20 workdays’’.
■
■
Subpart H—Administrative Appeals
§ 2.57—[Amended]
37. Amend § 2.57:
a. In paragraph (a)(5), by adding the
words ‘‘or you have been placed in the
wrong fee category’’ after the word
‘‘calculated’’; and
■ b. In paragraph (a)(6), by adding the
words ‘‘your request for’’ after the word
‘‘denied’’.
■
■
§ 2.59—[Amended]
38. In § 2.59, in paragraph (a), the first
sentence, remove the Web site address
‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/appeals.cfm’’
and add in its place the Web site
address ‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/
appeals’’.
■ 39. Revise § 2.60 to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
§ 2.60
Who makes decisions on appeals?
(a) The FOIA Appeals Officer is the
deciding official for FOIA appeals that
do not appeal a decision of the Office
of Inspector General.
(b) The General Counsel is the
deciding official for FOIA appeals that
appeal a decision of the Office of
Inspector General.
(c) When necessary, the appropriate
deciding official for FOIA appeals will
consult other appropriate offices,
including the Office of the Solicitor or
Office of General Counsel for denials of
records and fee waivers.
(d) The deciding official for FOIA
appeals normally will not make a
decision on an appeal if the request
becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
■ 40. Revise § 2.62 to read as follows:
§ 2.62 When can you expect a decision on
your appeal?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) The basic time limit for responding
to an appeal is 20 workdays after receipt
of an appeal meeting the requirements
of § 2.59 of this subpart.
(b) If the Department is unable to
reach a decision on your appeal within
the given time limit for response, the
appropriate deciding official for FOIA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
appeals will notify you of your statutory
right to seek review in a United States
District Court.
§ 2.63—[Amended]
41. In § 2.63, in paragraphs (b) and (c),
remove the words ‘‘FOIA Appeals
Officer’’ and add in their place the
words ‘‘appropriate deciding official for
FOIA appeals’’.
■
Subpart I—General Information
§ 2.65—[Amended]
42. In § 2.65, the first sentence,
remove the Web site address ‘‘https://
www.doi.gov/foia/libraries.cfm’’ and
add in its place the Web site address
‘‘https://www.doi.gov/foia/libraries’’.
■ 43. In § 2.66, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 2.66
What are public liaisons?
(a) Each bureau has a FOIA Public
Liaison who can assist requesters who
have concerns about the service they
received when seeking records or who
are seeking assistance under § 2.3(d) or
§ 2.37(i) of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
11131
§ 2.68—[Amended]
44. Amend § 2.68:
■ a. In paragraph (a), by removing the
number ‘‘14’’ and adding its place the
number ‘‘4.2’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘,
such as DAA–0048–2013–0001’’ to the
end of the paragraph; and
■ b. In paragraph (b), by removing the
number ‘‘14’’ and adding its place the
number ‘‘4.2’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘,
such as DAA–0048–2013–0001’’ to the
end of the paragraph.
■
§ 2.70—[Amended]
45. Amend § 2.70:
a. In the definition of Bureau, by
removing the Web site address ‘‘https://
www.doi.gov/foia/contacts.cfm’’ and
adding in its place the Web site address
https://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts; and
■ b. In the definition of Multitrack
processing, the second sentence, by
adding the word ‘‘ordinarily’’ after the
word ‘‘are’’.
■
■
[FR Doc. 2016–04647 Filed 3–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–10–P
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11124-11131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04647]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 2
[13XD4523WS DS10200000 DWSN00000.000000 WBS DP10202]
RIN 1093-AA19
Freedom of Information Act Regulations
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the regulations that the Department of the
Interior (Department) follows in processing records under the Freedom
of Information Act. The revisions clarify and update procedures for
requesting information from the Department and procedures that the
Department follows in responding to requests from the public.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Cafaro, Office of the Executive
Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs, 202-208-5342.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why We're Publishing This Rule and What it Does
A. Introduction
In late 2012, the Department published a final rule updating and
replacing the Department's previous Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
regulations. Since that time, in order to maintain the independence of
the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the Department and the OIG have
agreed to authorize the OIG to process their own FOIA appeals.
Additionally, the Department has recently migrated its Web site to a
new framework, leading to updated links. Finally, the Department has
received feedback from its FOIA practitioners and requesters and
identified areas where it is possible to further update, clarify, and
streamline the language of some procedural provisions. Therefore, the
Department is making the following changes:
Section 2.1(e) is amended to identify the regulations
applicable to Privacy Act requests.
Section 2.5(d) is amended to provide more guidance on what
happens when a request does not reasonably describe the records sought.
Portions of Sec. 2.6 are amended to make explicit that a
fee waiver request is a valid way of responding to a request for
additional fee information and that requesters may inform bureaus why
they believe they are eligible for discretionary fee waivers, and to
emphasize when fee issues must be resolved before processing will
begin.
A sentence is added to Sec. 2.8(a) to require a bureau
that cannot readily reproduce the requested record in the form or
format requested to explain why it cannot.
Section 2.9(b) is amended to remove a superfluous
introductory phrase.
Section 2.10 is amended to highlight the requirements a
requester seeking expedited processing must meet and the consequences
of not meeting those requirements.
Section 2.11 is amended to reduce the suggested contact
information provided by requesters.
Section 2.12(c) is amended to emphasize that reasonable
efforts must be made to search for requested records and to clarify
when searching for requested records in electronic form or format will
not occur.
A sentence is added to Sec. 2.15(e) to require bureaus to
provide more information to requesters when placing them in a different
processing track than requested.
Section 2.16(a) is amended to clarify and streamline
discussion of when the time period for responding to a request begins
and ends.
The introductory language of Sec. 2.19(a) is amended to
clarify when bureaus may extend the basic time limit.
Portions of Sec. 2.20 are amended to make explicit that
expedited processing requests are only appropriate before the
[[Page 11125]]
bureau issues its final response; to require bureaus to provide more
information to requesters when denying expedited processing requests;
and to clarify that the portion of an appeal that relates to an
expedited processing denial, rather than the entire appeal, will be
processed ahead of other appeals.
Section 2.22(c) and (d) is amended to clarify when records
may be released to requesters.
Section 2.23(a)(3) is amended to add a clarifying phrase.
Section 2.24(b) is amended and expanded to require bureaus
to provide more information to requesters in denial notifications.
Section 2.25(c) is amended to clarify what information
must be provided to requesters, and where, when portions of responsive
records have been deleted.
Section 2.26 and Sec. 2.27(a) are amended to provide more
information on when submitter notification is required.
One word in Sec. 2.27(b) is replaced to more closely
track the language of Executive Order No. 12600, (52 FR 23781,
published June 23, 1987).
Section 2.28(a) is amended to clarify that a general
description of the request would suffice for submitter notices
published under Sec. 2.27(b).
Section 2.31(a)(1) and (2) are amended to clarify the
information a submitter must provide when objecting to the release of
responsive information under Exemption 4.
Section 2.37(g) is added and Sec. 2.49(a)(1) is amended
so the concept that requesters generally will not be charged if the fee
for processing their request is less than $50 is introduced sooner.
Section 2.37(h) is added to make the consequences of
failure to pay bills for FOIA-related fees explicit.
Section 2.37(i) is added to notify requesters they can
seek assistance, when considering reformulating their request to meet
their needs at a lower cost, from the bureau's designated FOIA contact
or FOIA Public Liaison.
A sentence is added to Sec. 2.38(b) to require bureaus to
provide more information to requesters when placing them in a different
fee category than requested.
Section 2.39 is amended to replace one word for the sake
of grammatical consistency.
Section 2.42(d) is amended to further discuss the impact
of requester preferences for paper and/or electronic formats.
Section 2.44(b) is amended to provide different examples
of special services a requester might have to pay for.
The introductory language of Sec. Sec. 2.45(a) and
2.48(a) is amended to clarify what a requester must demonstrate to be
entitled to a fee waiver.
Section 2.46(b) is amended to clarify when fee waiver
requests may be made.
Minor grammatical changes are made to Sec. 2.47(a), (c),
and (d) to allow a new Sec. 2.47(e) to increase clarity and require
bureaus to provide the requester with notice of anticipated fees when
denying a request for a fee waiver.
Section 2.48(a)(2)(v) is amended to note that
representatives of the news media will be presumed to have the ability
and intent to disseminate the requested information to a reasonably
broad audience of persons interested in the subject.
Section 2.49(c) is amended to allow requesters more
flexibility in resolving fee issues.
Portions of Sec. 2.50 are amended to clarify discussion
of advance payments.
Section 2.51(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), and (c) are amended to
ensure consistent phrasing and to include minor, clarifying additions.
Section 2.57(a)(5) and (a)(6) are amended to include
minor, clarifying additions.
Section 2.60 is amended to reflect that the FOIA Appeals
Officer would no longer be the deciding official for FOIA appeals
arising from OIG FOIA responses, and small portions of Sec. Sec.
2.20(c), 2.24(b)(5), 2.47(d), 2.62, and 2.63 would also be amended to
reflect this change.
Section 2.62 is streamlined to follow the requirements of
FOIA more closely.
Section 2.66 is amended to provide more information on the
role played by FOIA Public Liaisons.
Section 2.68 is amended to reflect the new schedule number
resulting from the National Archives and Records Administration's
recent update to the General Records Schedule pertaining to FOIA
records and to add a reference to the Department's Record Schedule
pertaining to FOIA records.
A word is added to the definition of ``multitrack
processing'' in Section 2.70 to ensure it is consistent with Section
2.14.
Sections 2.1(d), 2.1(g), 2.3(c), 2.21(a), 2.41(c),
2.59(a), 2.65, and 2.70 are amended to reflect updated Web site links.
On September 30, 2015, the Department published a proposed rule in
the Federal Register (80 FR 58663) and requested comments over a 60-day
period ending on November 30, 2015. All comments received were
considered in drafting this final rule.
B. Discussion of Comments
Four commenters responded to the invitation for comments, including
one commenter from a subcomponent of a Federal agency and three
commenters from non-Federal sources. Two of these commenters offered
some substantive suggestions on specific existing provisions of the
rule that are not being amended; these suggestions are outside the
scope of this rulemaking and are not addressed below. While most of the
commenters generally supported the proposed changes (and one
``applaud[ed]'' certain existing provisions), they identified twelve
specific issues or recommendations related to the proposed rule, which
the Department addressed as follows:
The Final Rule Should Only Allow Requests for Clarification To Be Sent
by Email or Registered Mail
One commenter suggested that Sec. 2.5(d) be amended to require
requests for clarification be sent only via email or registered mail so
the agency can ``satisfy itself that the request for additional
material that was sent was actually received.'' The Department has not
adopted this suggestion as it is satisfied with the current flexibility
in this area and does not want to create additional expenses and
inflexibility.
The Final Rule Should Specify Response Deadlines for Responding to
Requests for More Information on the Records Sought
One commenter suggested that Sec. 2.5(d) ``should clarify whether
the requester's 20-workday response deadline runs from the date of the
Department's notice or from the date that the requester actually
receives the Department's notice.'' We agree and have modified our
edits to this section accordingly and have made analogous edits and
clarifications to Sec. Sec. 2.49(c), 2.51(b)(1), 2.51(b)(2),
2.51(b)(3), and 2.51(c).
The Final Rule Should Add New Information About How Fee Information
Affects the Processing of Requests
One commenter suggested Sec. 2.6(e) include a statement that ``A
denial of your waiver request and/or the amount you are willing to pay,
will result in an automatic truncation of the process to comply with
your FOIA request.'' We do not agree with this statement, as it is not
always true, and therefore have not adopted this suggestion. Another
commenter suggested the Department
[[Page 11126]]
revisit Sec. 2.6(e) and provided examples of Department of Justice
guidance on fee issues from 1983 and 2013. In response to this comment,
the Department reviewed both the suggested guidance and the Department
of Justice's FOIA regulations (amended in 2015) and added clarifying
information to Sec. 2.6(e) consistent with the Department of Justice's
FOIA regulations.
The Final Rule Should Include Additional Language Related to Expedited
Processing and Fees
One commenter suggested adding language to Sec. Sec. 2.10 and 2.20
explicitly stating that expedited requests do not incur additional
fees. We understand the point of this suggestion, but feel it would not
add clarity to the rule, especially as there is nothing in any section
of the regulations that indicates making such a request would incur
additional fees.
The Final Rule Should Explicitly Solicit Cellphone Numbers
One commenter suggested adding a specific reference to cellphone
numbers to Sec. 2.11. The Department has not adopted this suggestion.
The existing reference to ``daytime telephone numbers'' that
encompasses, but does not require, cellphone numbers, is sufficient.
The Final Rule Should Be Fair to the Requester
One commenter suggested that the last sentence of Sec. 2.12(c)
``is not fair to the requester'' and suggests it will be used in bad
faith. The language in question is drawn from the Freedom of
Information Act itself, and we believe it is fair; therefore this
language has not been changed.
The Final Rule Should Add a Reference to FOIA Public Liaisons to the
Section on Basic Time Limits
One commenter suggested adding information on seeking estimated
completion dates from FOIA Public Liaisons to Sec. 2.16(a), which
explains the basic concept of basic time limits for responding to
requests. This suggestion does not seem to fit in this provision and
would be confusing. We therefore decline to adopt it. Another commenter
suggested that the language in Sec. 2.16(a) was imprecise. We have
carefully considered this suggestion, but believe the existing language
is clear.
The Final Rule's Requester Fee Category Discussion Should Discuss
Appeals
One commenter suggested Sec. 2.38(b) specifically discuss whether
the decision that the requester belongs in a specific category can be
appealed. Our proposed modifications to Sec. 2.57(a)(5) already do
this very thing, so we decline to adopt this change.
The Final Rule Should Clarify What Fees for Other Services Requesters
Will Not Have To Pay
Two commenters had suggestions concerning Sec. 2.44(b). One
commenter suggested noting that ``conducting a search that requires the
creation of a new computer search program'' does not include extracting
and compiling the data from an existing database using a query. As the
rule is explicit that it applies only to locating records, we have not
adopted this suggestion. Another commenter suggested that this
provision explicitly exclude fees covered under Sec. 2.42(d). As this
section applies to requests for records in forms or formats that we
don't already maintain, we have not adopted this suggestion.
The Final Rule Should Not Be Vague
One commenter stated Sec. 2.46(b) was ``vague'' and wondered:
``How can one know when the bureau has not completed processing a
request? There should be a specific period (no of days), after which it
is reasonable to expect that the agency is complying with the request,
and therefore a fee waiver request would be too late. In such a
situation, if without a fee waiver the requester would opt for the
request to be stopped, then there would not have been any man-hours
already expended on fulfilling the request.'' This commenter therefore
suggested Sec. 2.46(b) should include ``a specific period (no of
days), after which it is reasonable to expect that the agency is
complying with the request and therefore a fee waiver request would be
too late.'' We believe that Sec. 2.46(b) is not vague and provides
requesters with as much flexibility in providing fee waiver requests as
possible. We therefore decline to adopt this change, as it would
negatively affect future requesters.
The Final Rule Should Limit Modifications of Requests Related to
Advanced Fees
One commenter suggested appending ``if you deem the adjudged fee to
be beyond your means'' at the end of Sec. 2.50(c) because someone
might reach some conclusion ``that once an advance payment requirement
is determined, then it follows that the requester is presumed unable to
afford it.'' We decline to adopt this change; we have deliberately
given requesters the opportunity to modify their request even if they
could pay the advance payment and we make no presumptions about a
requester will be able to afford the advance payment.
No Rule Should ``Deny an Individual From Obtaining Personal Information
About Themselves''
One commenter's entire comment was: ``There must be no rules
created that will deny an individual from obtaining personal
information about themselves.'' No changes have been made to the rule
based on this general statement.
C. Technical and Procedural Comments
One commenter noted National Archives and Records Administration's
recent update to the General Records Schedule pertaining to FOIA
records resulted in a new schedule number. We have confirmed this and
Sec. 2.68 has been amended accordingly. Additionally, we have slightly
amended Sec. 2.25(c) to more closely track the language of the FOIA
itself. Additionally, the Department made very minor clarifications in
Sec. Sec. 2.6(d), 2.11, 2.20(g), 2.48(b), and 2.60. In the interests
of clarity and consistency, the Department also added phrases to the
introductory text of Sec. 2.6(b), a sentence to Sec. 2.6(d), phrases
to Sec. 2.10, and phrases to Sec. Sec. 2.48(a)(2)(v) and 2.48(b).
Also in the interests of clarity and consistency, the Department added
and deleted phrases from Sec. Sec. 2.26, 2.27(a), and 2.47(d).
Finally, upon further consideration, the Department has decided against
amending Sec. 2.50(a) and (b).
II. Compliance With Laws and Executive Orders
1. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O) 12866 provides that the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs will review all significant rules. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not
significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based
[[Page 11127]]
on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must
allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Under the FOIA, agencies may recover only the direct costs of searching
for, reviewing, and duplicating the records processed for requesters.
Thus, fees assessed by the Department are nominal. Further, the ``small
entities'' that make FOIA requests, as compared with individual
requesters and other requesters, are relatively few in number.
3. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. This rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is
not required.
6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement. It would not substantially and
directly affect the relationship between the Federal and state
governments. A federalism summary impact statement is not required.
7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the
Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Executive Order.
8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated this
rule and determined that it has no potential effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes. This rule does not have tribal implications
that impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal
governments.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq) is not required. We may not
conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
10. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required. Pursuant to Department Manual 516 DM 2.3A(2), Section 1.10 of
516 DM 2, Appendix 1 excludes from documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ``policies, directives, regulations and
guidelines of an administrative, financial, legal, technical or
procedural nature; or the environmental effects of which are too broad,
speculative or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis
and will be subject late to the NEPA process, either collectively or
case-by-case.''
11. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required. This rule will not have a significant effect on the nation's
energy supply, distribution, or use.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2
Freedom of information.
Kristen J. Sarri,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management, and
Budget.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior amends part 2 of title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations
as follows:
PART 2--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 43
U.S.C. 1460, 1461.
Subpart A--Introduction
0
2. Amend Sec. 2.1:
0
a. In paragraph (d), the second sentence, by removing the Web site
address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/guidance.cfm'' and adding in its
place the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/news/guidance'';
0
b. By revising paragraph (e); and
0
c. In paragraph (g), the first sentence, by removing the Web site
address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/libraries.cfm'' and adding in its
place the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/libraries''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 2.1 What should you know up front?
* * * * *
(e) The Department's regulations for requests made under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are located at subpart K of this
part.
* * * * *
Subpart B--How To Make a Request
Sec. 2.3--[Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 2.3(c), the second sentence, by:
0
a. Removing the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/index.cfm''
and adding in its place the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/
foia''; and
0
b. Removing the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts.cfm'' and adding in its place the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts''.
0
4. In Sec. 2.5, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.5 How should you describe the records you seek?
* * * * *
(d) If the bureau determines that your request does not reasonably
describe the records sought, the bureau will inform you what additional
information you
[[Page 11128]]
need to provide in order to reasonably describe the records that you
seek so the requested records can be located with a reasonable amount
of effort. The bureau will also notify you that it will not be able to
comply with your request unless the additional information it has
requested is received from you in writing within 20 workdays after the
bureau has requested it and that you may appeal its determination. If
you receive this type of notification, you may wish to discuss it with
the bureau's designated FOIA contact or its FOIA Public Liaison (see
Sec. 2.66 of this part). If the bureau does not receive your written
response containing the additional information within 20 workdays after
the bureau has requested it, the bureau will presume that you are no
longer interested in the records and will close the file on the
request.
0
5. Amend Sec. 2.6 by revising paragraph (b) introductory text and
paragraphs (b)(3), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.6 How will fee information affect the processing of your
request?
* * * * *
(b) If the bureau anticipates that the fees for processing the
request will exceed the amount you have agreed to pay, or if you did
not agree in writing to pay processing fees or request a fee waiver and
the bureau anticipates the processing costs will exceed $50 (see Sec.
2.37(g) of this part) or will exceed your entitlements (see Sec. 2.39
of this part), the bureau will notify you:
* * * * *
(3) That it will not be able to fully comply with your request
unless you provide a fee waiver request and/or the requested written
assurance or advance payment.
* * * * *
(d) If you are seeking a fee waiver, your request must include a
justification that addresses and meets the criteria in Sec. Sec. 2.45
and 2.48 of this part. Failure to provide sufficient justification will
result in a denial of the fee waiver request. If you are seeking a fee
waiver, you may also indicate the amount you are willing to pay if the
fee waiver is denied. This allows the bureau to process the request for
records while it considers your fee waiver request. You may also inform
us of why you believe your request meets one or more of the criteria
for a discretionary fee waiver under Sec. 2.56 of this part.
(e) The bureau will begin processing your request only after all
issues regarding fees are resolved.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 2.8, add a sentence to the end of paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2.8 Can you ask for records to be disclosed in a particular form
or format?
(a) * * * If the bureau cannot readily reproduce the record in that
form or format, it must explain why it cannot.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 2.9, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.9 What if your request seeks records about another person?
* * * * *
(b) The bureau can require you to supply additional information if
necessary to verify that a particular person has consented to
disclosure or is deceased.
0
8. Revise Sec. 2.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 2.10 May you ask for the processing of your request to be
expedited?
You may ask for the processing of your request to be expedited. If
you are seeking expedited processing, your request must include a
justification that addresses and meets the criteria in Sec. 2.20 of
this part and includes the certification required at Sec. 2.20(b)(2)
of this part. Failure to provide sufficient justification or the
required certification will result in a denial of the expedited
processing request.
0
9. Revise Sec. 2.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 2.11 What contact information should your request include?
A request should include your name and a way (such as a mailing or
email address) for the bureau to send responsive records to you and/or
to request additional information or clarification of your request. You
may also wish to include a daytime telephone number (or the name and
telephone number of an appropriate contact).
Subpart C--Processing Requests
0
10. In Sec. 2.12, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.12 What should you know about how bureaus process requests?
* * * * *
(c) The bureau will make reasonable efforts to search for the
requested records. As part of its reasonable efforts, the bureau will
search paper and/or electronic records (for example, emails), as
appropriate. The bureau will not search for records in an electronic
form or format if these efforts would significantly interfere with the
operation of the bureau's automated information system.
* * * * *
Subpart D--Timing of Responses to Requests
0
11. In Sec. 2.15, add the following sentence to the end of paragraph
(e) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.15 What is multitrack processing and how does it affect your
request?
* * * * *
(e) * * * If you request placement in a particular processing track
but the bureau places you in a different processing track, the bureau
will provide you with an explanation of why you were not placed in the
processing track you requested.
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec. 2.16, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.16 What is the basic time limit for responding to a request?
(a) Ordinarily, the bureau has 20 workdays (including the date of
receipt) to determine whether to comply with a request, but unusual
circumstances may allow the bureau to take longer than 20 workdays (see
Sec. 2.19 of this subpart).
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec. 2.19, revise paragraph (a) introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 2.19 When may the bureau extend the basic time limit?
(a) The bureau may extend the basic time limit, if unusual
circumstances exist, by notifying you in writing of:
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 2.20, revise paragraphs (c), (f), and (g) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2.20 When will expedited processing be provided and how will it
affect your request?
* * * * *
(c) You may ask for expedited processing of your request by writing
to the appropriate FOIA contact in the bureau that maintains the
records requested any time before the bureau issues its final response
to your request. When making a request for expedited processing of an
administrative appeal, submit the request to the appropriate deciding
official for FOIA appeals.
* * * * *
(f) If expedited processing is denied, the bureau will:
(1) Inform you of the basis for the denial, including an
explanation of why the expedited processing request does not meet the
Department's expedited processing criteria under this section; and
(2) Notify you of the right to appeal the decision on expedited
processing in accordance with the procedures in subpart H of this part.
[[Page 11129]]
(g) If you appeal the bureau's expedited processing decision, that
portion of your appeal (if it is properly formatted under Sec. 2.59 of
this part) will be processed before appeals that do not challenge
expedited processing decisions.
* * * * *
Subpart E--Responses to Requests
Sec. 2.21--[Amended]
0
15. In Sec. 2.21(a), the second sentence, remove the Web site address
``https://www.doi.gov/foia/news/guidance/index.cfm'' and add in its
place the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/news/guidance''.
0
16. Amend Sec. 2.22:
0
a. By revising paragraph (c); and
0
b. In paragraph (d), by adding the words ``released or'' after the
words ``the records will be''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 2.22 How will bureaus grant requests?
* * * * *
(c) The bureau will release records (or portions of records) to you
promptly upon payment of any applicable fees (or before then, at its
discretion).
* * * * *
Sec. 2.23--[Amended]
0
17. In Sec. 2.23(a)(3), add the words ``and/or control'' after the
words ``bureau's possession''.
0
18. In Sec. 2.24, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.24 How will the bureau deny requests?
* * * * *
(b) The denial notification must include:
(1) The name and title or position of the person responsible for
the denial, along with an office phone number or email address;
(2) A statement of the reasons for the denial;
(3) A reference to any FOIA exemption applied by the bureau to
withhold records in full or in part;
(4) An estimate of the volume of any records withheld in full or in
part (for example, by providing the number of pages or some other
reasonable form of estimation), unless an estimate would harm an
interest protected by an exemption used to withhold the records;
(5) The name and title of the Office of the Solicitor or Office of
General Counsel attorney consulted (if the bureau is denying a fee
waiver request or withholding all or part of a requested record); and
(6) A statement that the denial may be appealed under subpart H of
this part and a description of the procedures in subpart H of this
part.
0
19. In Sec. 2.25, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.25 What if the requested records contain both exempt and
nonexempt material?
* * * * *
(c) If technically feasible, indicating the amount of information
deleted and the FOIA exemption under which the deletion was made at the
place in the record where the deletion was made.
Subpart F--Handling Confidential Information
0
20. Revise Sec. 2.26 to read as follows:
Sec. 2.26 May submitters of possibly confidential information
designate information as confidential when making Departmental
submissions?
(a) The Department encourages, but does not require, submitters to
designate confidential information in good faith (in other words, to
identify specific information as information the submitter considers
protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA, found at 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4)), at the time of submission or reasonably soon
thereafter.
(b) The designations discussed in paragraph (a) of this section
assist the bureau in identifying what information obtained from the
submitter is possibly confidential and triggers the requirement for
bureau-provided notifications under Sec. 2.27(a)(1) of this subpart.
0
21. Amend Sec. 2.27:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a); and
0
b. In paragraph (b), by removing the word ``large'' and adding in its
place the word ``voluminous''.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 2.27 When will the bureau notify a submitter of a request for
their possibly confidential information?
(a) Except as outlined in Sec. 2.29 of this subpart, a bureau must
promptly notify a submitter in writing when it receives a FOIA request
if:
(1) The requested information has been designated by the submitter
as confidential information under Sec. 2.26(a) of this subpart; or
(2) The requested information has not been designated as
confidential information by the submitter under Sec. 2.26(a) of this
subpart, but the bureau identifies it as possibly confidential
information.
* * * * *
0
22. In Sec. 2.28, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.28 What information will the bureau include when it notifies a
submitter of a request for their possibly confidential information?
* * * * *
(a) Either a copy of the request, the exact language of the
request, or (for notices published under Sec. 2.27(b) of this subpart)
a general description of the request;
* * * * *
0
23. In Sec. 2.31, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.31 What must a submitter include in a detailed Exemption 4
objection statement?
(a) * * *
(1) Whether the submitter provided the information voluntarily and,
if so, how disclosure will impair the Government's ability to obtain
similar information in the future and/or how the information fits into
a category of information that the submitter does not customarily
release to the public;
(2) Whether the Government required the information to be
submitted, and if so, how disclosure will impair the Government's
ability to obtain similar information in the future and/or how
substantial competitive or other business harm would likely result from
disclosure; and
* * * * *
Subpart G--Fees
0
24. In Sec. 2.37, add paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.37 What general principles govern fees?
* * * * *
(g) If the fee for processing your request is less than $50, you
will not be charged unless multiple requests are aggregated under Sec.
2.54 of this subpart to an amount that is $50 or more.
(h) If you fail to pay any FOIA-related fee within 30 calendar days
of the date of billing, the processing of any new or ongoing requests
and/or appeals from you shall ordinarily be suspended.
(i) If you would like to reformulate your request so it will meet
your needs at a lower cost, you may wish to seek assistance from the
bureau's designated FOIA contact or its FOIA Public Liaison (see Sec.
2.66 of this part).
0
25. In Sec. 2.38, add the following sentence to the end of paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.38 What are the requester fee categories?
* * * * *
(b) * * * If you request placement in a particular fee category but
the bureau places you in a different fee category,
[[Page 11130]]
the bureau will provide you with an explanation of why you were not
placed in the fee category you requested (for example, if you were
placed in the commercial use requester category rather than the
category you requested, the bureau will describe how the records would
further your commercial, trade, or profit interests).
* * * * *
Sec. 2.39--[Amended]
0
26. In the table at Sec. 2.39(a), remove the word ``non-commercial''
and add in its place the word ``noncommercial''.
Sec. 2.41--[Amended]
0
27. In Sec. 2.41(c), remove the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/
foia/fees-waivers.cfm'' and add in its place the Web site address
``https://www.doi.gov/foia/fees-waivers''.
0
28. In Sec. 2.42, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.42 What duplication fees will you have to pay?
* * * * *
(d) If the bureau must scan paper records to accommodate your
preference to receive records in an electronic format or print
electronic records to accommodate your preference to receive records in
a paper format, you will pay both the per page amount noted in Appendix
A to this part and the time spent by personnel scanning or printing the
requested records. For each quarter hour spent by personnel scanning or
printing the requested records, the fees will be the same as those
charged for a search under Sec. 2.41(b) of this subpart.
0
29. In Sec. 2.44, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.44 What fees for other services will you have to pay?
* * * * *
(b) Examples of these services include providing multiple copies of
the same record, converting records that are not already maintained in
a requested format to the requested format, obtaining research data
under Sec. 2.69 of this part, sending records by means other than
first class mail, and conducting a search that requires the creation of
a new computer search program to locate the requested records.
* * * * *
Sec. 2.45--[Amended]
0
30. In Sec. 2.45, in paragraph (a) introductory text, remove the words
``under the factors'' and add in their place the words ``by addressing
and meeting each of the criteria''.
0
31. In Sec. 2.46, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.46 When may you ask the bureau for a fee waiver?
* * * * *
(b) You may submit a fee waiver request at a later time if the
bureau has not yet completed processing your request.
0
32. Amend Sec. 2.47:
0
a. In paragraph (a), by removing the period at the end of the paragraph
and adding in its place a semicolon;
0
b. In paragraph (c), by removing the word ``and'' at the end of the
paragraph;
0
c. In paragraph (d), by removing the words ``to the FOIA Appeals
Officer, under the procedures in Sec. 2.57 of this part, within 30
workdays after'' and adding in their place the words ``under subpart H
of this part and a description of the requirements set forth therein,
within 30 workdays from'' and removing the period at the end of the
paragraph and adding in its place the word ``; and''; and
0
d. Adding paragraph (e).
0
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 2.47 How will the bureau notify you if it denies your fee waiver
request?
* * * * *
(e) Your anticipated fees, in accordance with Sec. 2.49 of this
subpart.
0
33. Amend Sec. 2.48 by revising paragraph (a) introductory text and
adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (a)(2)(v) to read as follows:
``''
Sec. 2.48 How will the bureau evaluate your fee waiver request?
(a) In deciding whether your fee waiver request meets the
requirements of Sec. 2.45(a)(1) of this subpart, the bureau will
consider the criteria listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of
this section. You must address and meet each of these criteria in order
to demonstrate that you are entitled to a fee waiver.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(v) * * * If we have categorized you as a representative of the
news media under Sec. 2.38, we will presume you have this ability and
intent.
* * * * *
0
34. In Sec. 2.49, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.49 When will you be notified of anticipated fees?
(a) * * *
(1) The anticipated fee is less than $50 (see Sec. 2.37(g) of this
subpart).
* * * * *
(c) If the bureau does not receive your written response containing
the additional information that resolves any fee issues, in accordance
with paragraphs (b)(2) and/or (b)(4) of this section, within 20
workdays after the bureau has requested it, the bureau will presume
that you are no longer interested in the records and will close the
file on the request.
* * * * *
0
35. In Sec. 2.50, revise paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.50 When will the bureau require advance payment?
* * * * *
(c) When the bureau notifies you that an advance payment is due
under paragraph (a) of this section, it will give you an opportunity to
reduce the fee by modifying the request.
(d) Your payment of the funds you owe the bureau for work it has
already completed before records are sent to you is not an advance
payment under paragraph (a) of this section.
* * * * *
Sec. 2.51--[Amended]
0
36. Amend Sec. 2.51:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(1), by adding the words ``after the bureau has
requested the additional clarification'' after the words ``within 20
workdays'';
0
b. In paragraph (b)(2), by adding the words ``after the bureau has
requested the additional clarification'' after the words ``within 20
workdays'';
0
c. In paragraph (b)(3), by removing the words ``hears from you within
20 workdays'' and add in their place the words ``receives a written
response from you within 20 workdays after the bureau has requested the
additional clarification''; and
0
d. In paragraph (c), by adding the words ``after the bureau has
requested the additional clarification'' after the words ``within 20
workdays''.
Subpart H--Administrative Appeals
Sec. 2.57--[Amended]
0
37. Amend Sec. 2.57:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(5), by adding the words ``or you have been placed
in the wrong fee category'' after the word ``calculated''; and
0
b. In paragraph (a)(6), by adding the words ``your request for'' after
the word ``denied''.
Sec. 2.59--[Amended]
0
38. In Sec. 2.59, in paragraph (a), the first sentence, remove the Web
site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/appeals.cfm'' and add in its
place the Web site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/appeals''.
0
39. Revise Sec. 2.60 to read as follows:
[[Page 11131]]
Sec. 2.60 Who makes decisions on appeals?
(a) The FOIA Appeals Officer is the deciding official for FOIA
appeals that do not appeal a decision of the Office of Inspector
General.
(b) The General Counsel is the deciding official for FOIA appeals
that appeal a decision of the Office of Inspector General.
(c) When necessary, the appropriate deciding official for FOIA
appeals will consult other appropriate offices, including the Office of
the Solicitor or Office of General Counsel for denials of records and
fee waivers.
(d) The deciding official for FOIA appeals normally will not make a
decision on an appeal if the request becomes a matter of FOIA
litigation.
0
40. Revise Sec. 2.62 to read as follows:
Sec. 2.62 When can you expect a decision on your appeal?
(a) The basic time limit for responding to an appeal is 20 workdays
after receipt of an appeal meeting the requirements of Sec. 2.59 of
this subpart.
(b) If the Department is unable to reach a decision on your appeal
within the given time limit for response, the appropriate deciding
official for FOIA appeals will notify you of your statutory right to
seek review in a United States District Court.
Sec. 2.63--[Amended]
0
41. In Sec. 2.63, in paragraphs (b) and (c), remove the words ``FOIA
Appeals Officer'' and add in their place the words ``appropriate
deciding official for FOIA appeals''.
Subpart I--General Information
Sec. 2.65--[Amended]
0
42. In Sec. 2.65, the first sentence, remove the Web site address
``https://www.doi.gov/foia/libraries.cfm'' and add in its place the Web
site address ``https://www.doi.gov/foia/libraries''.
0
43. In Sec. 2.66, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.66 What are public liaisons?
(a) Each bureau has a FOIA Public Liaison who can assist requesters
who have concerns about the service they received when seeking records
or who are seeking assistance under Sec. 2.3(d) or Sec. 2.37(i) of
this part.
* * * * *
Sec. 2.68--[Amended]
0
44. Amend Sec. 2.68:
0
a. In paragraph (a), by removing the number ``14'' and adding its place
the number ``4.2'' and adding the phrase ``, such as DAA-0048-2013-
0001'' to the end of the paragraph; and
0
b. In paragraph (b), by removing the number ``14'' and adding its place
the number ``4.2'' and adding the phrase ``, such as DAA-0048-2013-
0001'' to the end of the paragraph.
Sec. 2.70--[Amended]
0
45. Amend Sec. 2.70:
0
a. In the definition of Bureau, by removing the Web site address
``https://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts.cfm'' and adding in its place the
Web site address https://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts; and
0
b. In the definition of Multitrack processing, the second sentence, by
adding the word ``ordinarily'' after the word ``are''.
[FR Doc. 2016-04647 Filed 3-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-10-P