Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wyoming; Revisions to Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations; Chapter 6, Permitting Requirements, Section 13, Nonattainment New Source Review Permit Requirements, and Section 14, Incorporation by Reference, 10559-10562 [2016-04403]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary 33 CFR
100.35T07–0134 to read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 100.35T07–0134 Special Local
Regulations; International Dinghy Regatta;
San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico.
(a) Regulated Areas. The following
regulated areas are established as
Special Local Regulations. All
coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
(1) Race Area. All waters of Rada
Fajardo, Fajardo, Puerto Rico
encompassed within an imaginary line
connecting the following points: starting
at Point 1 in position 18°21.433′ N,
65°37.242′ W; thence southeast to Point
2 in position 18°21.402′ N, 65°37.162′
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
W; thence northeast to Point 3 in
position 18°22.937′ N, 65°36.358′ W;
thence northwest to point 4 in position
18°22.980′ N, 65°36.492′ W; thence
northwest back to origin. All persons
and vessels, except those persons and
vessels participating in the high-speed
boat race, are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area.
(2) Buffer Zone. All waters of Rada
Fajardo, Fajardo, Puerto Rico
encompassed within an imaginary line
connecting the following points: starting
at Point 1 in position 18°21.425′ N,
65°37.277′ W; thence southeast to Point
2 in position 18°21.366′ N, 65°37.158′
W; thence northeast to Point 3 in
position 18°22.951′ N, 65°36.314′ W;
thence northwest to point 4 in position
18°23.017′ N, 65°36.507′ W; thence
southwest back to the origin. All
persons and vessels except those
persons and vessels enforcing the buffer
zone are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the buffer zone.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port San Juan in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) Persons and
vessels may request authorization to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated areas by
contacting the Captain of the Port San
Juan by telephone at (787) 289–2041, or
a designated representative via VHF
radio on channel 16. If authorization is
granted by the Captain of the Port San
Juan or a designated representative, all
persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
San Juan or a designated representative.
(2) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated areas by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement Date. This rule is
enforced from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on
April 4, 2016.
Dated: February 24, 2016.
R. W. Warren,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Juan.
[FR Doc. 2016–04409 Filed 2–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10559
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0014; FRL–9943–01Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wyoming; Revisions to Wyoming Air
Quality Standards and Regulations;
Chapter 6, Permitting Requirements,
Section 13, Nonattainment New Source
Review Permit Requirements, and
Section 14, Incorporation by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of
Wyoming on November 6, 2015. This
submittal revises the Wyoming Air
Quality Standards and Regulations
(WAQSR) that pertain to the issuance of
Wyoming air quality permits for major
sources in nonattainment areas. This
action is being taken under section 110
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2016–0014 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Leone, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
10560
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6227,
leone.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Submitting Confidential Business
Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to
EPA through https://www.regulations.gov
or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be
CBI. For CBI information on a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register volume, date, and page
number);
• Follow directions and organize your
comments;
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
• Suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes;
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used;
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced;
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives;
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats; and,
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
In this proposed rulemaking, we are
proposing to take action to approve the
addition of Chapter 6, Section 13,
Nonattainment permit requirements,
and updated Section 14, Incorporation
by reference, WAQSR to the Wyoming
SIP. These provisions were submitted
by the Wyoming Department of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Environmental Quality (WDEQ) on
November 6, 2015, to address certain
CAA requirements related to ozone
nonattainment areas.
On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated
a revised National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) for ozone with an 8hour concentration limit of 0.075 parts
per million (‘‘8-Hour Ozone NAAQS’’).
Effective July 20, 2012, EPA designated
the Upper Green River Basin (UGRB)
area of Wyoming as ‘‘nonattainment’’ for
the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. For
nonattainment areas, states are required
to submit SIP revisions, including a
nonattainment NSR permitting program
for the construction and operation of
new or modified major stationary
sources located in the nonattainment
area.
On May 10, 2011, before the formal
designation of the UGRB area as
nonattainment for the 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS, the WDEQ submitted a
nonattainment new source review (NSR)
permitting program SIP revision to EPA.
This new section incorporated by
reference 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) section 51.165 in its
entirety, with the exception of
paragraphs (a) and (a)(1), into
Wyoming’s Chapter 6 Permitting
Requirements. On February 20, 2015 (80
FR 9194), EPA took final action to
disapprove the portion of Wyoming’s
May 10, 2011 submittal that added this
new section to the permitting
requirements in WAQSR Chapter 6. As
explained in 80 FR 9194, the method
Wyoming used to create a
nonattainment NSR program was not
consistent with the CAA and EPA
regulations.
Our final disapproval started a twoyear clock under CAA section 110(c)(1)
for our obligation to promulgate a
federal implementation plan (FIP) to
correct the deficiency and the 18-month
clock for sanctions, as required by CAA
section 179(a)(2). These deadlines will
be removed when we approve a SIP
revision addressing the deficiency in
Wyoming’s nonattainment NSR
permitting requirements.
The SIP revisions submitted by the
WDEQ on November 6, 2015, involve
Chapter 6, Permitting Requirements,
Section 13, Nonattainment new source
review permit requirements, and
Section 14, Incorporation by reference.
Chapter 6, Section 13, Nonattainment
new source review permit requirements,
establishes specific nonattainment new
source review permitting requirements.
In this revision, the WDEQ has
incorporated federal regulatory
language—establishing permitting
requirements for new and modified
major stationary sources in a
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
nonattainment area—from 40 CFR
51.165 and reformatted it into statespecific language that effectively
imposes requirements on sources in
Wyoming. Additionally, the WDEQ has
revised language within the rule to
maintain consistency with the State’s
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) regulations (WAQSR Chapter 6,
Section 4). In addition to the revisions
to Chapter 6, Section 13, the November
6, 2015, submittal also updates Chapter
6, Section 14, Incorporation by
reference, to adopt by reference from the
July 1, 2014, CFR. The State previously
submitted SIP revisions for Chapter 6,
Section 14 on May 28, 2015 that
requested adoption by reference of the
CFR that came after July 1, 2013. This
action requests an update to those
revisions.
III. What is the State process to submit
these materials to EPA?
Section 110(k) of the CAA addresses
EPA’s actions on submissions of
revisions to the SIP. The CAA requires
states to observe certain procedural
requirements in developing SIP
revisions for submittal to EPA. Sections
110(a)(2) and 110(l) of the CAA requires
that each SIP revision be adopted after
reasonable notice and public hearing.
This must occur prior to the revision
being submitted by the state to EPA.
For the November 6, 2015, submittal,
the Wyoming Environmental Quality
Council (WEQC) conducted a public
hearing on September 9, 2015 to hear
proposed revisions to the WAQSR from
the WDEQ, including the addition of
Chapter 6, Section 13, Nonattainment
new source review permitting
requirements, and Section 14,
Incorporation by reference. A notice for
submitting written comments on the
WDEQ proposed revisions was
published on July 14, 2015 and the
public comment period ended on
August 31, 2015. After reviewing
comments received, the WEQC
approved the proposed revisions on
September 9, 2015. The State has met
the procedural requirements for
submittal of this SIP revision.
IV. What are the changes that EPA is
proposing to approve?
EPA is proposing to approve the
portion of Wyoming’s November 6, 2015
submittal that adds a new section to the
permitting requirements in WAQSR
Chapter 6. As mentioned in Section I of
this rulemaking, Wyoming’s new
Chapter 6, Section 13, incorporated
federal regulatory language—
establishing permitting requirements for
new and modified major stationary
sources in a nonattainment area—from
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
40 CFR 51.165 and reformatted it into
state-specific language that effectively
imposes requirements on sources in
Wyoming. The submittal also updated
Chapter 6, Section 14, Incorporation by
reference.
Section 51.165 in title 40 of the CFR
(Permit Requirements) sets out the
minimum plan requirements states are
to use in developing nonattainment NSR
permitting programs. Generally, 40 CFR
51.165 consists of a set of definitions for
use in state programs, minimum plan
requirements for procedures for
determining applicability of
nonattainment new source review and
for the use of offsets, and minimum plan
requirements regarding other source
obligations, such as recordkeeping.
Specifically, subparagraphs
51.165(a)(1)(i) through (xlvi) enumerate
a set of definitions which states must
either use or replace with definitions
that a state demonstrates are more
stringent or at least as stringent in all
respects. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(2) sets
minimum plan requirements for
procedures to determine the
applicability of the nonattainment new
source review program to new and
modified sources. Subparagraph
51.165(a)(3), (a)(9) and (a)(11) set
minimum plan requirements for the use
of offsets by sources subject to
nonattainment new source review
requirements. Subparagraphs (a)(8) and
(a)(10) regard precursors, and
subparagraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) regard
recordkeeping obligations.
Subparagraph 51.165(a)(4) allows
nonattainment new source review
programs to treat fugitive emissions in
certain ways. Subparagraph 51.165(b)
sets minimum plan requirements for
new major stationary sources and major
modifications in attainment and
unclassifiable areas that would cause or
contribute to violations of the NAAQS.
Finally, subparagraph 51.165(f) sets
minimum plan requirements for the use
of plant-wide applicability limitations.
Please refer to the docket to view a
cross-walk table which outlines how
Wyoming’s Chapter 6, Section 13 rules
correlate with the requirements of 40
CFR 51.165.
As explained in detail in our prior
disapproval, the May 10, 2011
submittal, by directly incorporating by
reference in its entirety 40 CFR 51.165,
incorporated language such as ‘‘the plan
shall provide’’ and ‘‘the plan may
provide.’’ As a result, the May 10, 2011
submittal did not clearly and
unambiguously create obligations for
the sources that should be subject to
nonattainment NSR requirements. In
addition, the May 10, 2011 submittal
incorporated language from 40 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
51.165 such as ‘‘the plan shall include
enforceable procedures’’; incorporating
this language left the procedures
unspecified. Finally, the May 10, 2011
submittal created some inconsistencies
with Wyoming’s existing approved
minor NSR and PSD programs. First,
some exemptions for specific source
categories that have been approved for
the minor NSR program became
applicable to nonattainment NSR,
which is not allowed. Second, the
requirement for best available control
technology (BACT) in the minor NSR
program became applicable to the
nonattainment NSR program instead of
the appropriate requirement for lowest
achievable emission rate (LAER). Third,
the submittal did not clearly specify
whether the existing construction ban in
the Sheridan course particulate matter
(PM10) nonattainment area, adopted by
Wyoming to meet nonattainment NSR
requirements for that area, continued to
apply.
Instead of incorporating 40 CFR
51.165 by reference, the November 6,
2015 submittal adapts the language in
40 CFR 51.165 to remove phrases such
as ‘‘the plan shall provide’’ and ‘‘the
plan may provide,’’ and specifies the
procedures to be used. In addition, the
submittal revises language in 40 CFR
51.165 to specify that the WDEQ is the
reviewing authority. In one place, the
submittal modifies the term ‘‘building,
structure, facility, or installation’’ to
‘‘structure, building, facility, equipment,
installation, or operation,’’ without
modifying the substance of the
definition of the term, which is
permissible. These changes are
consistent with the CAA and EPA
regulations. Specifically:
1. CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), requires
each state plan to include ‘‘a program to
provide for . . . the regulation of the
modification and construction of any
stationary source within the areas
covered by the plan as necessary to
assure that the [NAAQS] are achieved,
including a permit program as required
in parts C and D of this subchapter.’’
2. CAA section 172(c)(5), provides
that the plan ‘‘shall require permits for
the construction and operation of new
or modified major stationary sources
anywhere in the nonattainment area, in
accordance with section [173].’’ By
removing language such as ‘‘the plan
shall provide,’’ the submittal avoids any
ambiguity as to whether permits are
required.
3. CAA section 173, lays out the
requirements for obtaining a permit that
must be included in a state’s SIPapproved permit program. Wyoming’s
Chapter 6, Section 13 rules impose these
requirements on sources, and the State’s
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10561
proposed plan clearly satisfies the
requirements of these statutory
provisions.
4. CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), requires
that SIPs contain enforceable emissions
limitations and other control measures.
Under section CAA section 110(a)(2),
the enforceability requirement in
section 110(a)(2)(A) applies to all plans
submitted by a state. Chapter 6, Section
13 creates enforceable obligations for
sources by removing phrases such as
‘‘the plan shall provide’’ and ‘‘the plan
may provide.’’
5. CAA section 110(i), (with certain
limited exceptions) prohibits states from
modifying SIP requirements for
stationary sources except through the
SIP revision process. By eliminating
unspecified procedures that were
referenced in the May 10, 2011
submittal, the November 6, 2015
submittal addresses this issue.
6. CAA section 172(c)(7), requires that
nonattainment plans, including
nonattainment NSR programs required
by section 172(c)(5), meet the applicable
provisions of section 110(a)(2),
including the requirement in section
110(a)(2)(A) for enforceable emission
limitations and other control measures.
7. CAA section 110(l), provides that
EPA cannot approve a SIP revision that
interferes with any applicable
requirement of the Act. As described
above, the addition of Chapter 6,
Section 13 to the Wyoming SIP would
not interfere with sections 110(a)(2) and
110(i) of the Act.
8. Wyoming’s SIP revision complies
with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.165
as the plan imposes the regulatory
requirements on individual sources, as
required by the regulatory provisions.
The crosswalk table in the docket
details how the submittal addresses
specific requirements in 40 CFR 51.165.
Wyoming’s submittal also addresses
the potential conflicts with the State’s
approved minor NSR and PSD programs
that existed in the May 5, 2011
submittal. First, Section 13(c)(i)
provides that the exemptions in the
minor NSR program (Section 2(k)) shall
not apply with regards to applicability
of the nonattainment NSR program.
Second, Section 13(d)(iv) states that
LAER, not BACT, applies to sources
subject to nonattainment NSR. Finally,
Section 13(f)(iii) clarifies that Section 13
does not apply in the Sheridan PM10
nonattainment area; instead the
construction ban in Section 2(c)(ii)(B)
continues to apply.
We note that the submittal contains
provisions relevant to nonattainment
NSR programs for PM2.5 nonattainment
areas. Specifically, in the definition of
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
10562
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
‘‘regulated NSR pollutant,’’ the
submittal provides that sulfur dioxide
(SO2) is a PM2.5 precursor, nitrogen
oxide (NOX) is presumed to be a PM2.5
precursor, and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and ammonia are
presumed to not be PM2.5 precursors.
This provision is consistent with the
nonattainment NSR regulations
promulgated in EPA’s May 16, 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule (73 FR
28321). However, on January 4, 2013,
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit, in Natural
Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 706
F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013), issued a
decision that remanded the EPA’s 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule. The
court found that EPA erred in
implementing the PM2.5 NAAQS in
these rules solely pursuant to the
general implementation provisions of
subpart 1 of part D of title I of the CAA,
rather than pursuant to the additional
implementation provisions specific to
particulate matter nonattainment areas
in subpart 4. In particular, subpart 4
includes section 189(e) of the CAA,
which requires the control of major
stationary sources of PM10 precursors
(and hence under the court decision,
PM2.5 precursors) ‘‘except where the
Administrator determines that such
sources do not contribute significantly
to PM10 levels which exceed the
standard in the area.’’ Accordingly,
nonattainment NSR programs that are
submitted for PM2.5 nonattainment areas
must regulate all PM2.5 precursors, i.e.,
SO2, NOX, VOC, and ammonia, unless
the Administrator determines that such
sources of a particular precursor do not
contribute significantly to
nonattainment in the nonattainment
area.
Although the State’s submittal only
requires regulation of SO2 and NOX as
PM2.5 precursors, the State of Wyoming
has no nonattainment areas for the PM2.5
standards. Accordingly, the EPA finds it
reasonable to conclude that major
sources of VOCs and ammonia do not
contribute significantly to PM2.5
nonattainment within the State. Thus,
there is no need at this time for the State
to regulate VOCs or ammonia as PM2.5
precursors in its nonattainment NSR
permitting program,1 and so we are
proposing to approve the submittal’s
PM2.5 precursor provisions. Should EPA
in the future designate an area in
Wyoming as nonattainment for PM2.5,
the State would have the obligation to
ensure that the nonattainment NSR
1 The submittal does properly regulate VOCs as
an ozone precursor, as intended by the State to
address nonattainment NSR requirements for the
UGRB ozone nonattainment area.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Feb 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
program met all applicable requirements
for PM2.5, including appropriate control
of precursors. See CAA sections
172(c)(5) and 189(a)(1)(A).
V. What action is EPA proposing today?
For the reasons described in section
IV, the EPA is proposing to approve
Wyoming’s November 6, 2015 submittal
which adds Chapter 6, Section 13 and
updates Chapter 6, Section 14. Our
action is based on an evaluation of
Wyoming’s rules against the
requirements of CAA sections
110(a)(2)(A), 110(a)(2)(C), 110(l)
172(c)(5), 173, 110(i), 172(c)(7),
regulations at 40 CFR 51.165, and other
requirements.
VI. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the WAQSR that pertain to the issuance
of Wyoming air quality permits for
major sources in nonattainment areas as
described in section IV of this preamble.
The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this rule’s
preamble for more information).
VII. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations
(42 U.S.C. 7410(k), 40 CFR 52.02(a)).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves some state law
as meeting federal requirements and
disapproves other state law because it
does not meet federal requirements; this
proposed action does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
Oct. 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and,
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds, Incorporation by
reference.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2016–04403 Filed 2–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10559-10562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04403]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0014; FRL-9943-01-Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wyoming; Revisions to Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations;
Chapter 6, Permitting Requirements, Section 13, Nonattainment New
Source Review Permit Requirements, and Section 14, Incorporation by
Reference
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Wyoming on November 6, 2015. This submittal revises the
Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations (WAQSR) that pertain to
the issuance of Wyoming air quality permits for major sources in
nonattainment areas. This action is being taken under section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2016-0014 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Leone, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
[[Page 10560]]
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202-1129, (303) 312-6227, leone.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting Confidential Business Information (CBI). Do not
submit CBI to EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For
CBI information on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically
within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as
CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register volume,
date, and page number);
Follow directions and organize your comments;
Explain why you agree or disagree;
Suggest alternatives and substitute language for your
requested changes;
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used;
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced;
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives;
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats; and,
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
In this proposed rulemaking, we are proposing to take action to
approve the addition of Chapter 6, Section 13, Nonattainment permit
requirements, and updated Section 14, Incorporation by reference, WAQSR
to the Wyoming SIP. These provisions were submitted by the Wyoming
Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) on November 6, 2015, to
address certain CAA requirements related to ozone nonattainment areas.
On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone with an 8-hour concentration limit
of 0.075 parts per million (``8-Hour Ozone NAAQS''). Effective July 20,
2012, EPA designated the Upper Green River Basin (UGRB) area of Wyoming
as ``nonattainment'' for the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. For nonattainment
areas, states are required to submit SIP revisions, including a
nonattainment NSR permitting program for the construction and operation
of new or modified major stationary sources located in the
nonattainment area.
On May 10, 2011, before the formal designation of the UGRB area as
nonattainment for the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS, the WDEQ submitted a
nonattainment new source review (NSR) permitting program SIP revision
to EPA. This new section incorporated by reference 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) section 51.165 in its entirety, with the exception of
paragraphs (a) and (a)(1), into Wyoming's Chapter 6 Permitting
Requirements. On February 20, 2015 (80 FR 9194), EPA took final action
to disapprove the portion of Wyoming's May 10, 2011 submittal that
added this new section to the permitting requirements in WAQSR Chapter
6. As explained in 80 FR 9194, the method Wyoming used to create a
nonattainment NSR program was not consistent with the CAA and EPA
regulations.
Our final disapproval started a two-year clock under CAA section
110(c)(1) for our obligation to promulgate a federal implementation
plan (FIP) to correct the deficiency and the 18-month clock for
sanctions, as required by CAA section 179(a)(2). These deadlines will
be removed when we approve a SIP revision addressing the deficiency in
Wyoming's nonattainment NSR permitting requirements.
The SIP revisions submitted by the WDEQ on November 6, 2015,
involve Chapter 6, Permitting Requirements, Section 13, Nonattainment
new source review permit requirements, and Section 14, Incorporation by
reference. Chapter 6, Section 13, Nonattainment new source review
permit requirements, establishes specific nonattainment new source
review permitting requirements. In this revision, the WDEQ has
incorporated federal regulatory language--establishing permitting
requirements for new and modified major stationary sources in a
nonattainment area--from 40 CFR 51.165 and reformatted it into state-
specific language that effectively imposes requirements on sources in
Wyoming. Additionally, the WDEQ has revised language within the rule to
maintain consistency with the State's Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) regulations (WAQSR Chapter 6, Section 4). In
addition to the revisions to Chapter 6, Section 13, the November 6,
2015, submittal also updates Chapter 6, Section 14, Incorporation by
reference, to adopt by reference from the July 1, 2014, CFR. The State
previously submitted SIP revisions for Chapter 6, Section 14 on May 28,
2015 that requested adoption by reference of the CFR that came after
July 1, 2013. This action requests an update to those revisions.
III. What is the State process to submit these materials to EPA?
Section 110(k) of the CAA addresses EPA's actions on submissions of
revisions to the SIP. The CAA requires states to observe certain
procedural requirements in developing SIP revisions for submittal to
EPA. Sections 110(a)(2) and 110(l) of the CAA requires that each SIP
revision be adopted after reasonable notice and public hearing. This
must occur prior to the revision being submitted by the state to EPA.
For the November 6, 2015, submittal, the Wyoming Environmental
Quality Council (WEQC) conducted a public hearing on September 9, 2015
to hear proposed revisions to the WAQSR from the WDEQ, including the
addition of Chapter 6, Section 13, Nonattainment new source review
permitting requirements, and Section 14, Incorporation by reference. A
notice for submitting written comments on the WDEQ proposed revisions
was published on July 14, 2015 and the public comment period ended on
August 31, 2015. After reviewing comments received, the WEQC approved
the proposed revisions on September 9, 2015. The State has met the
procedural requirements for submittal of this SIP revision.
IV. What are the changes that EPA is proposing to approve?
EPA is proposing to approve the portion of Wyoming's November 6,
2015 submittal that adds a new section to the permitting requirements
in WAQSR Chapter 6. As mentioned in Section I of this rulemaking,
Wyoming's new Chapter 6, Section 13, incorporated federal regulatory
language--establishing permitting requirements for new and modified
major stationary sources in a nonattainment area--from
[[Page 10561]]
40 CFR 51.165 and reformatted it into state-specific language that
effectively imposes requirements on sources in Wyoming. The submittal
also updated Chapter 6, Section 14, Incorporation by reference.
Section 51.165 in title 40 of the CFR (Permit Requirements) sets
out the minimum plan requirements states are to use in developing
nonattainment NSR permitting programs. Generally, 40 CFR 51.165
consists of a set of definitions for use in state programs, minimum
plan requirements for procedures for determining applicability of
nonattainment new source review and for the use of offsets, and minimum
plan requirements regarding other source obligations, such as
recordkeeping.
Specifically, subparagraphs 51.165(a)(1)(i) through (xlvi)
enumerate a set of definitions which states must either use or replace
with definitions that a state demonstrates are more stringent or at
least as stringent in all respects. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(2) sets
minimum plan requirements for procedures to determine the applicability
of the nonattainment new source review program to new and modified
sources. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(3), (a)(9) and (a)(11) set minimum plan
requirements for the use of offsets by sources subject to nonattainment
new source review requirements. Subparagraphs (a)(8) and (a)(10) regard
precursors, and subparagraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) regard recordkeeping
obligations. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(4) allows nonattainment new source
review programs to treat fugitive emissions in certain ways.
Subparagraph 51.165(b) sets minimum plan requirements for new major
stationary sources and major modifications in attainment and
unclassifiable areas that would cause or contribute to violations of
the NAAQS. Finally, subparagraph 51.165(f) sets minimum plan
requirements for the use of plant-wide applicability limitations.
Please refer to the docket to view a cross-walk table which outlines
how Wyoming's Chapter 6, Section 13 rules correlate with the
requirements of 40 CFR 51.165.
As explained in detail in our prior disapproval, the May 10, 2011
submittal, by directly incorporating by reference in its entirety 40
CFR 51.165, incorporated language such as ``the plan shall provide''
and ``the plan may provide.'' As a result, the May 10, 2011 submittal
did not clearly and unambiguously create obligations for the sources
that should be subject to nonattainment NSR requirements. In addition,
the May 10, 2011 submittal incorporated language from 40 CFR 51.165
such as ``the plan shall include enforceable procedures'';
incorporating this language left the procedures unspecified. Finally,
the May 10, 2011 submittal created some inconsistencies with Wyoming's
existing approved minor NSR and PSD programs. First, some exemptions
for specific source categories that have been approved for the minor
NSR program became applicable to nonattainment NSR, which is not
allowed. Second, the requirement for best available control technology
(BACT) in the minor NSR program became applicable to the nonattainment
NSR program instead of the appropriate requirement for lowest
achievable emission rate (LAER). Third, the submittal did not clearly
specify whether the existing construction ban in the Sheridan course
particulate matter (PM10) nonattainment area, adopted by
Wyoming to meet nonattainment NSR requirements for that area, continued
to apply.
Instead of incorporating 40 CFR 51.165 by reference, the November
6, 2015 submittal adapts the language in 40 CFR 51.165 to remove
phrases such as ``the plan shall provide'' and ``the plan may
provide,'' and specifies the procedures to be used. In addition, the
submittal revises language in 40 CFR 51.165 to specify that the WDEQ is
the reviewing authority. In one place, the submittal modifies the term
``building, structure, facility, or installation'' to ``structure,
building, facility, equipment, installation, or operation,'' without
modifying the substance of the definition of the term, which is
permissible. These changes are consistent with the CAA and EPA
regulations. Specifically:
1. CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), requires each state plan to include
``a program to provide for . . . the regulation of the modification and
construction of any stationary source within the areas covered by the
plan as necessary to assure that the [NAAQS] are achieved, including a
permit program as required in parts C and D of this subchapter.''
2. CAA section 172(c)(5), provides that the plan ``shall require
permits for the construction and operation of new or modified major
stationary sources anywhere in the nonattainment area, in accordance
with section [173].'' By removing language such as ``the plan shall
provide,'' the submittal avoids any ambiguity as to whether permits are
required.
3. CAA section 173, lays out the requirements for obtaining a
permit that must be included in a state's SIP-approved permit program.
Wyoming's Chapter 6, Section 13 rules impose these requirements on
sources, and the State's proposed plan clearly satisfies the
requirements of these statutory provisions.
4. CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), requires that SIPs contain enforceable
emissions limitations and other control measures. Under section CAA
section 110(a)(2), the enforceability requirement in section
110(a)(2)(A) applies to all plans submitted by a state. Chapter 6,
Section 13 creates enforceable obligations for sources by removing
phrases such as ``the plan shall provide'' and ``the plan may
provide.''
5. CAA section 110(i), (with certain limited exceptions) prohibits
states from modifying SIP requirements for stationary sources except
through the SIP revision process. By eliminating unspecified procedures
that were referenced in the May 10, 2011 submittal, the November 6,
2015 submittal addresses this issue.
6. CAA section 172(c)(7), requires that nonattainment plans,
including nonattainment NSR programs required by section 172(c)(5),
meet the applicable provisions of section 110(a)(2), including the
requirement in section 110(a)(2)(A) for enforceable emission
limitations and other control measures.
7. CAA section 110(l), provides that EPA cannot approve a SIP
revision that interferes with any applicable requirement of the Act. As
described above, the addition of Chapter 6, Section 13 to the Wyoming
SIP would not interfere with sections 110(a)(2) and 110(i) of the Act.
8. Wyoming's SIP revision complies with the requirements of 40 CFR
51.165 as the plan imposes the regulatory requirements on individual
sources, as required by the regulatory provisions. The crosswalk table
in the docket details how the submittal addresses specific requirements
in 40 CFR 51.165.
Wyoming's submittal also addresses the potential conflicts with the
State's approved minor NSR and PSD programs that existed in the May 5,
2011 submittal. First, Section 13(c)(i) provides that the exemptions in
the minor NSR program (Section 2(k)) shall not apply with regards to
applicability of the nonattainment NSR program. Second, Section
13(d)(iv) states that LAER, not BACT, applies to sources subject to
nonattainment NSR. Finally, Section 13(f)(iii) clarifies that Section
13 does not apply in the Sheridan PM10 nonattainment area;
instead the construction ban in Section 2(c)(ii)(B) continues to apply.
We note that the submittal contains provisions relevant to
nonattainment NSR programs for PM2.5 nonattainment areas.
Specifically, in the definition of
[[Page 10562]]
``regulated NSR pollutant,'' the submittal provides that sulfur dioxide
(SO2) is a PM2.5 precursor, nitrogen oxide
(NOX) is presumed to be a PM2.5 precursor, and
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and ammonia are presumed to not be
PM2.5 precursors. This provision is consistent with the
nonattainment NSR regulations promulgated in EPA's May 16, 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule (73 FR 28321). However, on
January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit, in Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428
(D.C. Cir. 2013), issued a decision that remanded the EPA's 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule. The court found that EPA
erred in implementing the PM2.5 NAAQS in these rules solely
pursuant to the general implementation provisions of subpart 1 of part
D of title I of the CAA, rather than pursuant to the additional
implementation provisions specific to particulate matter nonattainment
areas in subpart 4. In particular, subpart 4 includes section 189(e) of
the CAA, which requires the control of major stationary sources of
PM10 precursors (and hence under the court decision,
PM2.5 precursors) ``except where the Administrator
determines that such sources do not contribute significantly to
PM10 levels which exceed the standard in the area.''
Accordingly, nonattainment NSR programs that are submitted for
PM2.5 nonattainment areas must regulate all PM2.5
precursors, i.e., SO2, NOX, VOC, and ammonia,
unless the Administrator determines that such sources of a particular
precursor do not contribute significantly to nonattainment in the
nonattainment area.
Although the State's submittal only requires regulation of
SO2 and NOX as PM2.5 precursors, the
State of Wyoming has no nonattainment areas for the PM2.5
standards. Accordingly, the EPA finds it reasonable to conclude that
major sources of VOCs and ammonia do not contribute significantly to
PM2.5 nonattainment within the State. Thus, there is no need
at this time for the State to regulate VOCs or ammonia as
PM2.5 precursors in its nonattainment NSR permitting
program,\1\ and so we are proposing to approve the submittal's
PM2.5 precursor provisions. Should EPA in the future
designate an area in Wyoming as nonattainment for PM2.5, the
State would have the obligation to ensure that the nonattainment NSR
program met all applicable requirements for PM2.5, including
appropriate control of precursors. See CAA sections 172(c)(5) and
189(a)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The submittal does properly regulate VOCs as an ozone
precursor, as intended by the State to address nonattainment NSR
requirements for the UGRB ozone nonattainment area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. What action is EPA proposing today?
For the reasons described in section IV, the EPA is proposing to
approve Wyoming's November 6, 2015 submittal which adds Chapter 6,
Section 13 and updates Chapter 6, Section 14. Our action is based on an
evaluation of Wyoming's rules against the requirements of CAA sections
110(a)(2)(A), 110(a)(2)(C), 110(l) 172(c)(5), 173, 110(i), 172(c)(7),
regulations at 40 CFR 51.165, and other requirements.
VI. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the WAQSR that pertain to the issuance of Wyoming air quality
permits for major sources in nonattainment areas as described in
section IV of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this rule's preamble for more
information).
VII. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations (42 U.S.C. 7410(k), 40 CFR 52.02(a)). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely approves some state law as meeting federal
requirements and disapproves other state law because it does not meet
federal requirements; this proposed action does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and,
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds, Incorporation by reference.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2016-04403 Filed 2-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P